OpenLegislation

Rule 11 Documents required to be verified by a statement of truth

Changes not yet applied. Later legislation changes this provision in ways not yet written into the text below:

(1)

The following documents must be verified by a statement of truth—

(a)

a permission form, an application form or an application notice, where the applicant seeks to rely upon matters set out in the document as evidence;

(b)

a witness statement;

(c)

a certificate of—

(i)

service or non-service; or

(ii)

notification or non-notification;

(d)

a deputy’s declaration; and

(e)

any other document required by a rule or practice direction to be so verified.

(2)

Subject to paragraph (3), a statement of truth is a statement that—

(a)

the party putting forward the document;

(b)

in the case of a witness statement, the maker of the witness statement; or

(c)

in the case of a certificate referred to in paragraph (1)(c), the person who signs the certificate,

believes that the facts stated in the document being verified are true.

(3)

If a party is conducting proceedings with a litigation friend, the statement of truth in—

(a)

a permission form;

(b)

an application form; or

(c)

an application notice,

is a statement that the litigation friend believes the facts stated in the document being verified are true.

(4)

The statement of truth must be signed—

(a)

in the case of a permission form, an application form or an application notice—

(i)

by the party or litigation friend; or

(ii)

by the legal representative on behalf of the party or litigation friend; and

(b)

in the case of a witness statement, by the maker of the statement.

(5)

A statement of truth which is not contained in the document which it verifies must clearly identify that document.

(6)

A statement of truth in a permission form, an application form or an application notice may be made by—

(a)

a person who is not a party; or

(b)

two or more parties jointly,

where this is permitted by a relevant practice direction.