OpenLegislation

Article 69 Determination whether the heating repair or heating replacement allowance is exhausted

Original text. Later amendments are not shown.

(1)

This article applies for the purposes of articles 67 and 68.

(2)

A participant’s heating repair allowance is exhausted unless X is less than the participant’s heating repair allowance, where “X” is the sum of—

(a)

the number of ECO4 projects promoted by the participant—

(i)

which include a capped heating repair measure; and

(ii)

for which the Administrator has given a positive score under article 47(1)(b) before the qualifying action in question;

(b)

the number of ECO4 projects promoted by the participant which include a qualifying action—

(i)

which is a capped heating repair measure; and

(ii)

for which the Administrator has given a positive score under article 47(1)(c)(i) before the qualifying action in question;

(c)

the number of ECO3 interim delivery actions promoted by the participant—

(i)

which are capped heating repair measures; and

(ii)

for which the Administrator has given a positive score under article 47(1)(c)(iii) before the qualifying action in question.

(3)

A participant’s heating replacement allowance is exhausted unless Y is less than the participant’s heating replacement allowance, where “Y” is the sum of—

(a)

the number of ECO4 projects promoted by the participant—

(i)

which include a capped heating replacement measure; and

(ii)

for which the Administrator has given a positive score under article 47(1)(b) before the qualifying action in question;

(b)

the number of ECO4 projects promoted by the participant which include a qualifying action—

(i)

which is a capped heating replacement measure; and

(ii)

for which the Administrator has given a positive score under article 47(1)(c)(i) before the qualifying action in question;

(c)

the number of ECO3 interim delivery actions and surplus actions promoted by the participant—

(i)

which are capped heating replacement measures; and

(ii)

for which the Administrator has given a positive score under article 47(1)(c)(iii) before the qualifying action in question.