{
  "url": "https://openlegislation.uk/draft-payment-and-electronic-money-institution-insolvency-regulations-2021/regulation-37",
  "json_url": "https://openlegislation.uk/draft-payment-and-electronic-money-institution-insolvency-regulations-2021/regulation-37.json",
  "legislation": "ukdsi/2021/9780348222814",
  "legislation_title": "The Payment and Electronic Money Institution Insolvency Regulations 2021",
  "legislation_url": "https://openlegislation.uk/draft-payment-and-electronic-money-institution-insolvency-regulations-2021",
  "path": "regulation/37",
  "kind": "regulation",
  "number": "37",
  "heading": "Application of the IA 1986",
  "text": "(1) The provisions of the IA 1986 mentioned in the first column of the Table apply to special administration as they apply to any other insolvency proceedings, with any modifications shown in the third column.\n(2) This regulation is subject to—\n(a) Schedule 1 (which makes provision about how special administration applies to limited liability partnerships), and\n(b) Schedule 2 (which makes provision about how special administration applies to partnerships).\nProvision\nSubject\nModifications\nSections\nGenerally (for the provisions of this part of the table mentioned below)\nTo be read as if—\n(a) references to a provision of the IA 1986 which is applied and modified by these Regulations were to the provision as applied and modified by these Regulations,\n(b) references to the liquidator were to the administrator,\n(c) references to winding up were to special administration,\n(d) references to winding up by the court were to the imposition of special administration by order of the court,\n(e) references to being wound up under Part 4 or 5 of the IA 1986 were to being in special administration,\n(f) references to the commencement of winding up were to the commencement of special administration,\n(g) references to going into liquidation were to entering special administration,\n(h) references to liquidation or to insolvent liquidation were to special administration,\n(i) references to a winding-up order were to a special administration order, and\n(j) references to a company were to an institution.\nThose general modifications are subject to any specific modifications below.\nSections 74 and 76–83\nContributories\nSection 167 (and Schedule 4)\nPowers of the liquidator\nTo be read as if—\n(a) in subsection (2) the references to a liquidation committee were to a creditors’ committee;\n(b) a user or holder may also apply to the court under subsection (3);\n(c) in Schedule 4, paragraphs 4 to 10 and 12 were omitted and in paragraph 13, the reference to winding up the company’s affairs and distributing its assets were to pursuing the special administration objectives.\nSection 168(4)\nDiscretion in managing and distributing assets\nSection 176\nPreferential charges on goods distrained\nSection 176ZB\nApplication of proceeds of office-holder claims\nSection 176A\nUnsecured creditors\nSection 178\nDisclaimer of onerous property\nSection 179\nDisclaimer of leaseholds\nSection 180\nLand subject to rent charge\nSection 181\nDisclaimer: powers of court\nSection 182\nPowers of court (leaseholds)\nSection 183\nEffect of execution or attachment (England and Wales)\nTo be read as if subsection (2)(a) were omitted.\nSection 184\nDuties of officers\nTo be read as if, in subsection (1), there were no reference to a resolution having been passed for voluntary winding up.\nSection 185\nEffect of diligence (Scotland)\nTo be read as if, in the application of subsections (3) to (10) of section 23A of the Bankruptcy (Scotland) Act 2016 (asp 21), the reference to an order of the court awarding winding up were to the making of the special administration order.\nSection 186\nRescission of contracts by the court\nSection 187\nPower to make over assets to employees\nSection 193\nUnclaimed dividends (Scotland)\nSection 194\nResolutions passed at adjourned meetings\nTo be read as it applied immediately before its repeal by paragraph 46 of Schedule 9 to the SBEEA 2015.\nSection 196\nJudicial notice of court documents\nSection 197\nCommission for receiving evidence\nSection 198\nCourt order for examination of persons in Scotland\nSection 199\nCosts of application for leave to proceed (Scottish companies)\nSection 206\nFraud in anticipation of winding up\nTo be read as if, in subsection (1), there were no reference to passing a resolution for voluntary winding up.\nSection 207\nTransactions in fraud of creditors\nTo be read as if, in subsection (1), there were no reference to passing a resolution for voluntary winding up.\nSection 208\nMisconduct in course of winding up\nTo be read as if—\n(a) in subsection (1), “whether by the court or voluntarily” were omitted;\n(b) there were no amendment made by paragraph 52 of Schedule 9 to the SBEEA 2015.\nSection 209\nFalsification of company’s books\nSection 210\nMaterial omissions from statement\nTo be read as if—\n(a) in subsection (1), “whether by the court or voluntarily” were omitted;\n(b) in subsection (2), “or has passed a resolution for voluntary winding up” were omitted.\nSection 211\nFalse representation to creditors\nTo be read as if in subsection (1)—\n(a) “whether by the court or voluntarily” were omitted;\n(b) the reference to the company’s creditors included users or holders.\nSection 212\nSummary remedy\nSection 213\nFraudulent trading\nSection 214\nWrongful trading\nTo be read as if subsection (6) were omitted.\nSection 215\nProceedings under section 213 or 214\nSection 216\nRestriction on re-use of company names\nTo be read as if—\n(a) the reference to a liquidating company were to a company in special administration;\n(b) subsections (7) and (8) were omitted.\nSection 217\nPersonal liability for debts following contravention of section 216\nTo be read as if subsection (6) were omitted.\nSection 218\nProsecution of delinquent officers and members of company\nTo be read as if —\n(a) in subsection (3), the first reference to the official receiver were omitted and the second reference were to the Secretary of State;\n(b) in subsection (5) the reference to subsection (4) were to subsection (3);\n(c) subsections (4) and (6) were omitted.\nSection 219\nObligations arising under section 218\nTo be read as if, in subsection (1), the reference to section 218(4) were to section 218(3).\nSection 233\nUtilities\nSection 233A\nFurther protection of utilities\nSection 234\nGetting in the company’s property\nTo be read as if —\n(a) for subsection (1) there were substituted—\n“(1) This section applies where a company enters special administration.”;\n(b) the references to the office-holder were references to the administrator.\nSection 235\nCo-operation with the administrator\nTo be read as if —\n(a) subsections (1) and (4)(b) to (d) were omitted;\n(b) the references to the office-holder were references to the administrator.\nSection 236\nInquiry into company’s dealings\nTo be read as if —\n(a) for subsection (1) there were substituted—\n“(1) This section applies where a company enters special administration.”;\n(b) the references to the office-holder were references to the administrator.\nSection 237\nEnforcement by the court\nSection 238\nTransactions at an undervalue (England and Wales)\nSection 239\nPreferences (England and Wales)\nSection 240\nSections 238 and 239: relevant time\nTo be read as if —\n(a) in subsection (2)(a), the reference to being unable to pay debts were to be read in accordance with section 93(4) of the BA 2009 (as applied and modified by the EMR 2011 and the PSR 2017);\n(b) sub-paragraphs (1)(d) and (3)(a) to (d) were omitted.\nSection 241\nOrders under sections 238 and 239\nTo be read as if subsections (3A) and (3B) were omitted.\nSection 242\nGratuitous alienations (Scotland)\nSection 243\nUnfair preferences (Scotland)\nSection 244\nExtortionate credit transactions\nSection 245\nAvoidance of floating charges\nTo be read as if —\n(a) in subsection (3)(c), the references to administration application and administration order were references to an application for special administration and special administration order respectively;\n(b) in subsection (4)(a) and (b), the reference to being unable to pay debts were to be read in accordance with section 93(4) of the BA 2009 (as applied and modified by the EMR 2011 and the PSR 2017);\n(c) subsections (3)(d) and (5)(a) to (c) were omitted.\nSection 246\nUnenforceability of liens\nTo be read as if —\n(a) for subsection (1) there were substituted—\n“(1) This section applies where a company enters special administration.”;\n(b) the references to the office-holder were references to the administrator.\nSection 246ZD\nPower to assign certain causes of action\nTo be read as if—\n(a) for subsection (1) there were substituted—\n“(1) This section applies where a company enters special administration.”;\n(b) the references to the office holder were references to the administrator.\nSection 246A\nRemote attendance at meetings\nTo be read as if —\n(a) there were no amendments made by paragraph 54 of Schedule 9 to the SBEEA 2015;\n(b) references to creditors included users or holders.\nSection 246B\nUse of websites\nSection 386 (and Schedule 6 as read with Schedule 4 to the Pensions Schemes Act 1993)\nPreferential debts\nSection 387, subsections (1) and (3A)\n“The relevant date”\nTo be read as if the reference to “administration” were to special administration.\nSection 389\nOffence of acting without being qualified\nTo be read as if—\n(a) the reference to acting as an insolvency practitioner were to acting as the administrator;\n(b) subsection (2) were omitted.\nSections 390 to 391T\nAuthorisation and regulation of insolvency practitioners\nTo be read as if—\n(a) in section 390, references to acting as an insolvency practitioner were to acting as the administrator;\n(b) in subsection (2) of that section, after “authorised” there were inserted “to act as an insolvency practitioner”;\n(c) an order under section 391 had effect in relation to any provision applied for the purposes of special administration;\n(d) in sections 390A, 390B(1) and (3), 391O(1)(b) and 391R(3)(b), references to authorisation or permission to act as an insolvency practitioner in relation to (or only in relation to) companies, the reference to companies had effect as a reference to companies without modification by this Table.\n(e) in sections 391Q(2)(b) and 391S(3)(e) the references to a company had effect a references to a company without modification by this Table.\nSection 411\nInsolvency rules\nTo be read as if, in subsections (1A), (2C) and (3), the reference to Part 2 of the BA 2009 were to a reference to these Regulations.\nSection 414\nFees orders\nTo be read as if —\n(a) in subsection (1), the reference to Parts I to VII of this Act were to these Regulations;\n(b) there were no reference to the official receiver.\nSection 423\nTransactions defrauding creditors\nTo be read as if subsection (4) were omitted.\nSections 424 and 425\nTransactions defrauding creditors\nSection 426\nCo-operation between courts\nTo be read as if references to insolvency law included provisions made by or under these Regulations.\nSections 430 and 431 (and Schedule 10)\nOffences\nSection 432\nOffences by bodies corporate\nTo be read as if, in subsection (4), there were no provisions of the IA 1986 listed there except for sections 206 to 211.\nSection 433\nStatements: admissibility\nSections 434B–434D\nSupplementary provisions\nTo be read as if there were no amendments of section 434B made by paragraph 57 of Schedule 9 to the SBEEA 2015.\nSchedule B1\nGenerally (for the provisions of this part of the table mentioned below)\nTo be read as if—\n(a) references to a provision of the IA 1986 which is applied and modified by these Regulations were to the provision as applied and modified by these Regulations,\n(b) references to the administrator were to the administrator appointed under regulation 7,\n(c) references to administration were to special administration,\n(d) references to an administration order were to a special administration order,\n(e) references to a company were to an institution, and\n(f) references to the purpose of administration were to the special administration objectives.\nThose general modifications are subject to any specific modifications below.\nParagraph 40(1)(a)\nDismissal of pending winding up petition\nParagraph 42\nMoratorium on insolvency proceedings\nTo be read as if sub-paragraphs (4)(a) and (4)(aa) were omitted.\nParagraph 43\nMoratorium on other legal processes\nParagraph 44(1), (5) and (7)\nInterim moratorium\nTo be read as if—\n(a) sub-paragraph (7) also included a reference to paragraph 44 not preventing or requiring the permission of the court for an application by the FCA for a special administration order;\n(b) sub-paragraph (7)(b) to (d) were omitted.\nParagraph 45\nPublicity\nParagraph 46\nAnnouncement of administrator’s appointment\nTo be read as if —\n(a) in sub-paragraph (3)(a), in addition to obtaining the list of creditors, the administrator were also required to obtain as complete a list as possible of the users or holders of the institution;\n(b) in sub-paragraph (3)(b), the administrator were also required to send a notice of their appointment to each user or holder of whose claim and address the administrator is aware;\n(c) where the special administration application has not been made by the FCA, notice of the administrator’s appointment were also required to be sent under sub-paragraph (5) to the FCA;\n(d) sub-paragraphs (6)(b) and (c) were omitted.\nParagraph 47\nStatement of company’s affairs\nTo be read as if, in sub-paragraph (2), there were also a reference to including particulars of the relevant funds held by the institution.\nParagraph 48\nStatement of company’s affairs\nParagraph 49\nAdministrator’s proposals\nTo be read as if —\n(a) sub-paragraph (2)(b) were omitted;\n(b) there were no amendment made by paragraph 10(2) of Schedule 9 to the SBEEA 2015;\n(c) in sub-paragraph (4), the administrator were also required to send a copy of the statement of proposals to every user or holder of whose claim the administrator is aware and who the administrator has a means of contacting, and to the FCA;\n(d) the administrator were also required to give notice that the statement of proposals is to be provided free of charge to a payment system operator who applies in writing to a specified address.\nThe application of paragraph 49(1) to (3) is subject to regulation 38(6).\nParagraph 50\nCreditors’ meeting\nTo be read as if —\n(a) there were no repeal by paragraph 10(3) of Schedule 9 to the SBEEA 2015;\n(b) in sub-paragraph (1), the administrator were also required to summon the users or holders referred to in paragraph 49(4) to the meeting of creditors and to give such users or holders notice under sub-paragraph (1)(b);\n(c) the FCA were empowered to appoint a person to attend a meeting of creditors and make representations as to any matter for decision.\nParagraph 51\nRequirement for initial creditors’ meeting\nTo be read as if —\n(a) there were no amendments made by paragraph 10(4) and (5) of Schedule 9 to the SBEEA 2015;\n(b) there were a requirement that each copy of an administrator’s proposals sent to a user or holder or the FCA under paragraph 49 be accompanied by an invitation to the initial creditors’ meeting.\nThe application of paragraph 51 is subject to regulation 38(6).\nParagraph 53\nBusiness and result of initial creditors’ meeting\nTo be read as if —\n(a) there were no amendments made by paragraph 10(8) to (10) of Schedule 9 to the SBEEA 2015;\n(b) there were a requirement that special administration insolvency rules prescribe how users or holders are to vote at meetings of creditors;\n(c) in sub-paragraph (2), if the FCA has not appointed a person to attend the meeting, the administrator were also required to report any decision taken to the FCA.\nThe application of paragraph 53 is subject to regulation 38(6).\nParagraph 54\nRevision of administrator’s proposals\nTo be read as if —\n(a) there were no amendments made by paragraph 10(11) to (16) of Schedule 9 to the SBEEA 2015;\n(b) if the revision proposed by the administrator affects both creditors and users or holders, every reference to creditors included users or holders;\n(c) if the administrator thinks that the revision proposed only affects either creditors or users or holders, it only applied to the affected party and required the party not affected to be informed of the revision;\n(d) the FCA were required to be invited to the creditors’ meeting mentioned in sub-paragraph (2)(a);\n(e) the statement of the proposed revision mentioned in sub-paragraph (2)(b) were also required to be sent to the FCA.\nThe application of paragraph 54 is subject to regulation 38(6).\nParagraph 55\nFailure to obtain approval of administrator’s proposals\nTo be read as if —\n(a) there were no amendment made by paragraph 10(17) of Schedule 9 to the SBEEA 2015;\n(b) in making an order under sub-paragraph (2) the court were required to have regard to the special administration objectives;\n(c) sub-paragraph (2)(d) were omitted.\nThe application of paragraph 55 is subject to regulation 38(6).\nParagraph 56\nFurther creditors’ meetings\nTo be read as if —\n(a) there were no amendments made by paragraph 10(18) to (20) of Schedule 9 to the SBEEA 2015;\n(b) the administrator were required to invite the FCA to any meeting summoned.\nParagraph 57\nCreditors’ committee\nTo be read as if —\n(a) there were no amendment made by paragraph 10(21) of Schedule 9 to the SBEEA 2015;\n(b) a creditors’ committee were only able to be established by a creditors’ meeting to which creditors and users or holders have both been given notice;\n(c) the FCA were empowered to appoint a person to attend a meeting of the creditors’ committee and make representations as to any matter for decision;\n(d) there were a requirement that special administration insolvency rules prescribe that, where a meeting of creditors resolves to establish a creditors’ committee, the makeup of the creditors’ committee is a reflection of all parties with an interest in the achievement of the special administration objectives.\nParagraph 58\nCorrespondence instead of creditors’ meeting\nTo be read as it applied immediately before its repeal by paragraph 10(22) of Schedule 9 to the SBEEA 2015.\nParagraph 59\nFunctions of an administrator\nTo be read as if—\n(a) in sub-paragraph (1) the administrator’s power were to do anything necessary or expedient in pursuit of Objectives 1 to 3;\n(b) in sub-paragraph (2) the reference to a provision of the Schedule expressly permitting the administrator to do a specified thing included a provision of these Regulations expressly permitting the administrator to do a specified thing;\n(c) at the end there were inserted—\n“(4) The administrator is an officer of the court.”\nParagraph 60 (and Schedule 1 to the IA 1986)\nGeneral powers\nParagraph 61\nDirectors\nParagraph 62\nPower to call meetings\nTo be read as if —\n(a) there were no amendment made by paragraph 10(23) of Schedule 9 to the SBEEA 2015;\n(b) the administrator were also empowered to call a meeting of users or holders or contributories.\nParagraph 63\nApplication to court for directions\nParagraph 64\nManagement powers\nParagraph 65\nDistribution to creditors\nTo be read as if sub-paragraph (3) were omitted in respect of England and Wales.\nParagraph 66\nPayments\nParagraph 67\nProperty\nParagraph 68\nManagement\nTo be read as if references to proposals approved under paragraphs 53 or 54 included, without need for approval—\n(a) proposals agreed with the FCA under 39 or 40; or\n(b) proposals in respect of which the court has made an order dispensing with the need for agreement in accordance with those regulations.\nParagraph 69\nAgency\nParagraph 70\nFloating charge\nParagraph 71\nNon-floating charge\nParagraph 72\nHire purchase property\nParagraph 73\nProtection for secured or preferential creditors\nTo be read as if sub-paragraph (2)(d) were omitted.\nParagraph 74\nChallenge to administrator’s conduct\nTo be read as if —\n(a) there were no amendment made by paragraph 10(24) of Schedule 9 to the SBEEA 2015;\n(b) the FCA were also empowered to make an application to the court, on the grounds that—\n(i) the administrator is acting or has acted so as unfairly to harm the interests of some or all of the members, creditors or users or holders;\n(ii) the administrator is proposing to act in a way which would unfairly harm the interests of some or all of the members, creditors or users or holders;\n(iii) the administrator has failed to carry out a reconciliation in accordance with regulation 13;\n(c) a user or holder were also empowered to make an application to the court under sub-paragraph (1) or (2);\n(d) any of the following persons were also empowered to make an application on the grounds that the administrator is not taking any action in response to a request from that person under regulation 35(3) and that the person is of the opinion that the action requested would not lead to a material reduction in the value of the property of the institution—\n(i) the Bank of England;\n(ii) the Treasury;\n(iii) the FCA;\n(iv) the Payment Systems Regulator;\n(e) the following persons were also empowered to make an application on the grounds that the administrator has made, or proposes to make, a PPTA in contravention of 32 or 34—\n(i) the Bank of England;\n(ii) the FCA;\n(f) any person, other than the institution, who is party to an arrangement of a kind referred to in regulation 31(1) were also empowered to make an application on the grounds that the administrator has made, or proposes to make, a relevant transfer in contravention of that regulation;\n(g) where an application is made on the grounds that the administrator has made a relevant transfer in contravention of regulation 34—\n(i) sub-paragraphs (3)(a), (d) and (e) and (4) were omitted;\n(ii) the court were also empowered to make an order declaring that the transfer was made in contravention of the regulation concerned;\n(h) where an application is made on the grounds that the administrator has made a relevant transfer in contravention of regulation 32 or 33, the court were also empowered to make such order as it thinks fit for restoring the position to what it would have been if the transfer had not been made in contravention of the regulation concerned;\n(i) where the FCA has given a direction under regulation 38 which has not been withdrawn, the court did not have power to make an order if it would impede or prevent compliance with the direction.\nParagraph 75\nMisfeasance\nTo be read as if a user or holder and the FCA were included in the list of persons who may make an application under sub-paragraph (2).\nParagraph 79\nCourt ending administration on application of administrator\nTo be read as if sub-paragraph (2) were omitted.\nParagraph 81\nCourt ending administration on application of a creditor\nTo be read as if it did not apply where the administrator was appointed by the court on the application of the FCA or the Secretary of State.\nParagraph 84\nTermination: no more relevant funds for distribution\nTo be read as if—\n(a) the administrator were only empowered to send a notice under sub-paragraph (1) if the institution no longer holds relevant funds;\n(b) there were no amendment made by paragraph 10(33) of Schedule 9 to the SBEEA 2015;\n(c) in sub-paragraph (5)(b), a copy of the notice were also required to be sent be sent to every user or holder of the institution of whom the administrator is aware and the FCA.\nParagraph 85\nDischarge of administration order\nParagraph 86\nNotice to Companies Registrar at the end of administration\nParagraph 87\nResignation\nTo be read as if —\n(a) where the administrator was appointed by the court on the application of the FCA or the Secretary of State, the notice of the resignation given in accordance with sub-paragraph (2)(a) were also required to be given to the applicant;\n(b) sub-paragraphs (2)(b) to (d) were omitted.\nParagraph 88\nRemoval\nParagraph 89\nDisqualification\nTo be read as if —\n(a) where the administrator was appointed by the court on the application of the FCA or the Secretary of State, the notice given in accordance with sub-paragraph (2)(a) were also required to be given to the applicant;\n(b) sub-paragraphs (2)(b) to (d) were omitted.\nParagraph 90\nReplacement\nTo be read as if reference to paragraphs 91 to 95 were to paragraph 91 only.\nParagraph 91\nReplacement\nTo be read as if the FCA were included in the list of persons who may make an application to appoint an administrator in sub-paragraph (1) but to whom the restrictions in sub-paragraph (2) apply.\nParagraph 98\nDischarge\nTo be read as if —\n(a) there were no amendment made by paragraph 10(38) of Schedule 9 to the SBEEA 2015;\n(b) sub-paragraphs (2)(b) and (ba) and (3) were omitted.\nParagraph 99\nVacation of office: charges and liabilities\nTo be read as if —\n(a) in sub-paragraph (3), the former administrator’s remuneration and expenses incurred in respect of the pursuit of Objective 1 are to be charged on and payable out of relevant funds;\n(b) in sub-paragraph (4)(b), the reference to any charge arising under sub-paragraph (3) did not include a charge on relevant funds.\nParagraph 100\nJoint and concurrent administrators\nParagraph 101\nJoint and concurrent administrators\nTo be read as if in sub-paragraph (3), the reference to paragraphs 87 to 99 were to paragraphs 87 to 91 and 98 to 99.\nParagraph 102\nJoint and concurrent administrators\nParagraph 103\nJoint and concurrent administrators\nTo be read as if —\n(a) in sub-paragraph (2), the reference to paragraph 12(1)(a) to (e) were to regulation 8(1);\n(b) sub-paragraphs (3) to (5) were omitted.\nParagraph 104\nPresumption of validity\nParagraph 105\nMajority decision of directors\nParagraph 106 (and section 430 of and Schedule 10 to the IA 1986)\nFines\nTo be read as if —\n(a) there were no amendments made by paragraph 11 of Schedule 9 to the SBEEA 2015;\n(b) sub-paragraph (2)(a), (b) and (l) to (n) was omitted.\nParagraph 107\nExtension of time limit\nTo be read as if, in considering an application under paragraph 107, the court were required to have regard to the special administration objectives.\nParagraph 108\nExtension of time limit\nTo be read as if —\n(a) there were no amendments made by paragraph 10(39), (40), (42) and (43) of Schedule 9 to the SBEEA 2015;\n(b) the administrator were also required to obtain consent of those users or holders whose claims amount to more than 50% of the total amount of claims for relevant funds, disregarding the claims of those users or holders who were sent a copy of the statement of proposals but who did not respond to an invitation to give or withhold consent;\n(c) sub-paragraph (3) were omitted.\nParagraph 109\nExtension of time limit\nParagraph 111\nInterpretation\nTo be read as if —\n(a) there were no amendment made by paragraph 10(44) of Schedule 9 to the SBEEA 2015;\n(b) the definition of “administrator” and sub-paragraph (1A)(b) and (c) and sub-paragraph (1B) were omitted.\nParas 112–116\nScotland",
  "extent": null,
  "status": null,
  "version": "current",
  "annotations": [],
  "outstanding_effects": [],
  "provenance": {
    "source": "legislation.gov.uk",
    "source_url": "https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukdsi/2021/9780348222814/regulation/37",
    "retrieved_at": "2026-10-30T14:47:23.719408+00:00"
  },
  "licence": "Open Government Licence v3.0",
  "licence_url": "https://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/version/3/",
  "attribution": "Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Source: legislation.gov.uk, The National Archives."
}