Paragraph 5 (Bromley, Cambridgeshire, Derby, Derbyshire and Rutland)

(1)

The number appearing to the funding authority to be the number of registered pupils at the school who on 16th January 1997 were entitled to be provided with free school meals under section 512(3) or (5) of the 1996 Act multiplied by the number in column (6) opposite the entry for the authority in table 1 in Part VI.

(Barnet, Ealing, Lambeth, Walsall and Wiltshire, and Essex, Gloucestershire and Hillingdon as primary relevant authorities)

(2)

The number appearing to the funding authority to be the number treated by the authority under their scheme (or, where the school is a grant-maintained school, the number which would have been so treated had the school been covered by the scheme) as the number of points allocated to the school in accordance with the allocation formula under the authority’s scheme for pupils who have special educational needs but who do not have statements multiplied by the number in column (6) opposite the entry for the authority in table 1 in Part VI or, in the case of a primary school, in table 2 in Part VI.

Bournemouth and Poole

(3)

The number appearing to the funding authority to be the aggregate for the school of A × B, which aggregate is then multiplied by C, multiplied by 100 and multiplied by the number in column (6) opposite the entry for the authority in table 1 in Part VI, where—

A is the number of registered pupils at the school of each age in column (1) of the table below as would be determined in accordance with Dorset County Council’s scheme for the financial year beginning in 1996;
B is the weighting in column (2) of the table below which is opposite the relevant age in column (1) of that table—

(1) (2)
Age Weighting

10 0.030501
11–13 0.0221003
14 0.0027669
15 0;
C is the average percentage of slow learners in the school as defined in Dorset County Council’s scheme for the financial year beginning in 1996 over the last three years for which data is available.

(1)	(2)
10	0.030501
11–13	0.0221003
14	0.0027669
15	0;

Brent

(4)

The number appearing to the funding authority to represent the school’s share (or, where the school is a grant-maintained school, the share which would have been the school’s share had the school been covered by the scheme) of funding treated by the authority under their scheme as funding for pupils who have special educational needs but who do not have statements and allocated in accordance with the allocation formula under the authority’s scheme multiplied by the number in column (6) opposite the entry for the authority in table 1 in Part VI.

Calderdale and Essex as a secondary relevant authority

(5)

The number (expressed as a percentage) appearing to the funding authority to represent the share treated by the authority under their scheme (or, where the school is a grant-maintained school, the share which would have been so treated had the school been covered by the scheme) as the school’s share of funding, allocated in accordance with the allocation formula based on reading test data, for pupils who have special educational needs but who do not have statements multiplied by the number in column (6) opposite the entry for the authority in table 1 in Part VI.

Croydon

(6)

The number appearing to the funding authority to be the aggregate of the numbers of registered pupils at the school on 19th January 1995, 18th January 1996 and 16th January 1997 who were entitled to be provided with free school meals under section 512(3) or (5) of the 1996 Act divided by 3 and multiplied by the number in column ( 6) opposite the entry for the authority in table 1 in Part VI.

Cumbria

(7)

The number appearing to the funding authority to be the number that would be treated by the authority, having regard to the “Richmond Test”, if their scheme as it existed in the financial year beginning in 1996 applied in the financial year in question (or, where the school is a grant-maintained school, the number which would have been so treated had the school been covered by the scheme), for the purpose of determining the budget share of the school for the financial year in question as the number of registered pupils at the school who have special educational needs but who do not have statements multiplied by the number in column (6) opposite the entry for the authority in table 1 in Part VI.

(Gloucestershire as a secondary relevant authority, Kingston, Surrey, Sutton, and Trafford)

(8)

The number appearing to the funding authority to be the number treated by the authority under their scheme (or, where the school is a grant-maintained school, the number which would have been so treated had the school been covered by the scheme) for the purposes of determining the budget share of the school for the financial year in question as the number of registered pupils at the school who have special educational needs but who do not have statements multiplied by the number in column (6) opposite the entry for the authority in table 1 in Part VI.

Enfield

(9)

The number appearing to the funding authority to be the number treated by the authority under their scheme, for the purposes of the SEN audit as therein referred to (or, where the school is a grant-maintained school, the number which would have been so treated had the school been covered by the scheme) as the number of registered pupils at the school who have special educational needs but who do not have statements multiplied by the number in column (6) opposite the entry for the authority in table 1 in Part VI.

Hertfordshire

(10)

(a)

The number appearing to the funding authority to be the number which would be treated by the authority under their scheme (or, where the school is a grant-maintained school, the number which would be so treated if the school had been covered by the scheme) as the number of points allocated to the school in accordance with the allocation formula under the authority’s scheme, on the hypothesis set out in (b) below, for pupils who have special educational needs but who do not have statements multiplied by the number in column (6) opposite the entry for the authority in table 1 in Part VI.

(b)

The hypothesis is that references to “present arrangements” in the allocation formula are references, not to “present arrangements” under that scheme, but to the number appearing to the funding authority to be the number of registered pupils at the school on 18th January 1996 who were entitled to be provided with free school meals under section 22(3) or (3A) of the Education Act 1980^f1.

Hillingdon as a secondary relevant authority

(11)

The number appearing to the funding authority to be the number of points allocated to the school in accordance with the allocation formula under the authority’s scheme, devised by the Hillingdon Association of Secondary Headteachers, based on reading tests administered to pupils in the financial year beginning in 1996, multiplied by the number in column (6) opposite the entry for the authority in table 1 in Part VI.

Kent

(12)

(a)

in accordance with the allocation formula under the authority’s scheme, but

(b)

using the weighting for each band in that allocation formula given in the authority’s scheme for the financial year beginning in 1994, multiplied by the number in column (6) opposite the entry for the authority in table 1 in Part VI.

Luton

(13)

The number appearing to the funding authority to be (A-B) multiplied by the number in column (6) opposite the entry for the authority in table 1 in Part VI, where—

A is the number appearing to the funding authority to be the number of registered pupils at the school who on 16th January 1997 were—
1. (a)
  
  entitled to be provided with free school meals under section 512(3) or (5) of the 1996 Act, or
2. (b)
  
  in the care of a local authority, and
B is 2 per cent of the number appearing to the funding authority to be the number of registered pupils at the school on 16th January 1997.

Milton Keynes

(14)

The number appearing to the funding authority to be the number of registered pupils at the school aged 11 or 12 on 16th January 1997 who have special educational needs but who do not have statements as determined by the authority’s Gadapol Reading Comprehension Test multiplied by the number in column (6) opposite the entry for the authority in table 1 in Part VI.

Swindon

(15)

The number appearing to the funding authority to be the number that would be treated under Wiltshire County Council’s scheme (or, where the school is a grant-maintained school, the number which would have been so treated had the school been covered by the scheme) as the number of points allocated to the school in accordance with the allocation formula under that scheme for pupils who have special educational needs but who do not have statements multiplied by the number in column (6) opposite the entry for the authority in table 1 in Part VI.

(Wandsworth)

(16)

(a)

The number determined in (b) below, multiplied by the number in column (6) opposite the entry for the authority in table 1 in Part VI.

(b)

(i)

in respect of so many of the said points which relate to free school meals entitlement, by 3.9630, and

(ii)

in respect of so many of the said points which relate to the results of National Curriculum tests and tasks administered to pupils at Key Stage 2, by 20.7089.

Annotations

Footnotes

f1: 1980 c. 20; sub-section (3A) was inserted by the Education Reform Act 1988 (c. 40), Schedule 12, paragraph 24.