# The Education (Grant-maintained and Grant-maintained Special Schools) (Finance) Regulations 1997, Paragraph 9: (Calderdale, Enfield, Hertfordshire, Milton Keynes and Surrey)


(1) Where it appears to the funding authority that the school is treated by the authority in accordance with their scheme (or, in the case of a grant-maintained school, would have been so treated had the school been covered by the scheme) as having a split site, the number in column (10) opposite the entry for the authority in table 1 in Part VI.
Essex as a secondary relevant authority
(2) Where it appears to the funding authority that the school is treated by the authority in accordance with their scheme (or, in the case of a grant-maintained school, would have been so treated had the school been covered by the scheme) as having a split site—
(a) the number in column (10) opposite the entry for the authority in table 1 in Part VI; or
(b) the number in (a) multiplied by 2, in the case of a school appearing to the funding authority to have at least two sites—
(i) more than 0.5 but less than 4 kilometres apart as measured by the shortest available route from main door to main door in the principal building on each site, and
(ii) where pupils travelling between those sites have to go along a public footway or road outside the curtilage of the school; or
(c) the number in (a) multiplied by 4, in the case of a school appearing to the funding authority to have at least two such sites 4 kilometres or more apart.
(Hillingdon as a secondary relevant authority)
(3) (a) In the case of The Douay Martyrs School, the number in column (10) opposite the entry for the authority in table 1 in Part VI; and
(b) in the case of Bishop Ramsey School, twice the number in column (10) opposite the entry for the authority in table 1 in Part VI.
Barnet
(4) Where it appears to the funding authority that the school is treated by the authority in accordance with their scheme (or, in the case of a grant-maintained school would have been so treated had the school been covered by the scheme) as having a split site, the number in column (10) opposite the entry for the authority in table 1 in Part VI, multiplied in the case of a school listed in column (1) of the table below by the figure in column (2)—
(1)
(2)
Hasmonean High School, Barnet
1.70
East Barnet School, Barnet
1.96
(Bournemouth, Brent and Trafford)
(5) (a) In the case of St Peter’s RC School, Bournemouth, Alperton High School, Brent and Altrincham Girls Grammar School, Trafford, the number in column (10) opposite the entry for the authority in table 1 in Part VI;
(b) in the case of Kingsbury High School, Brent, the number in column (10) opposite the entry for the authority in table 1 in Part VI multiplied by 1.76; and
(c) in the case of Sale Grammar School, Trafford, the number in column (10) opposite the entry for the authority in table 1 in Part VI multiplied by 3.54.
Cumbria
(6) Where it appears to the funding authority that the school is treated by the authority in accordance with their scheme (or, in the case of a grant-maintained school, would have been so treated had the school been covered by the scheme) as having a split site, the aggregate of the numbers determined under paragraph 3A multiplied by the number in column (10) opposite the entry for the authority in table 1 in Part VI.
Kent
(7) Where it appears to the funding authority that the school is treated by the authority in accordance with their scheme (or, in the case of a grant-maintained school, would have been so treated had the school been covered by the scheme) as having a split site, the aggregate of the pupil numbers in the various age bands determined under paragraph 3D in the school multiplied by the number in column (10) opposite the entry for the authority in table 1 in Part VI.
Lambeth
(8) Where it appears to the funding authority that the school is treated by the authority in accordance with their scheme (or, in the case of a grant-maintained school, would have been so treated had the school been covered by the scheme) as having a split site, the number of points applicable to the school for this factor under the authority’s scheme, multiplied by the number in column (10) opposite the entry for the authority in table 1 in Part VI.
Derby
(9) Where it appears to the funding authority that the school has at least two sites 500 metres or more apart when measured from the nearest points of access to each site, the number in column (10) opposite the entry for the authority in table 1 in Part VI.
Derbyshire
(10) Where it appears to the funding authority that the school is treated by the authority in accordance with their scheme (or, in the case of a grant-maintained school would have been so treated had the school been covered by the scheme) as having a split site, the number in column (10) opposite the entry for the authority in table 1 in Part VI, multiplied in the case of the schools listed in column (1) of the table below by the figure in column (2) of that table —
(1)
(2)
New Mills School
2.29
Swanwick Hall School
2.60
Lady Manners School
3.17
Highfields School
5.29
Long Eaton Community School
5.47
Queen Elizabeth’s School, Ashbourne
5.89
The Dronfield School
5.96
Newbold Community School
6.13
Bolsover School
3.48
Glossopdale Community College
8.55.
(Gloucestershire as a primary relevant authority)
(11) Where it appears to the funding authority that the school is treated by the authority in accordance with their scheme (or, in the case of a grant-maintained school, would have been so treated had the school been covered by the scheme) as having a split site—
(a) the number in column (10) opposite the entry for the authority in table 2 in Part VI; or
(b) the number in (a) multiplied by 2, in the case of a school appearing to the funding authority to have at least two sites more than one mile apart.
(Swindon and Wiltshire)
(12) (a) Where it appears to the funding authority that the school has, having regard to the relevant provisions of Wiltshire County Council’s scheme, a split site—
(i) the number in column (10) opposite the entry for the authority in table 1 in Part VI, or
(ii) in the case of a school which received the higher of two possible allocations under that scheme for the preceding financial year, or would have received it had the school been covered by Wiltshire County Council’s scheme, the number in column (10) opposite the entry for the authority in table 1 in Part VI multiplied by 1.5.
(b) In the case of Hardenhuish School, the number in column (10) opposite the entry for the authority in table 1 in Part VI.

---
Source: https://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/1997/996/schedule/5/paragraph/9 (the official version)
Page: https://openlegislation.uk/education-grant-maintained-and-grant-maintained-special-schools-finance-regulations-1997/schedule-5/paragraph-9
Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Source: legislation.gov.uk, The National Archives.