# Commission Decision of 7 July 2004 imposing fines on an undertaking for supplying incorrect or misleading information in a notification in a merger control proceeding (Case No COMP/M.3255 — Tetra Laval/Sidel) (notified under document number C(2004) 2500) (Only the English version is authentic) (Text with EEA relevance) (2005/305/EC), Division (15)

Extent: E+W+S+N.I.

Tetra’s principal argument is that Tetra Fast does not form part of any market affected by the operation and does not closely relate to the affected market for SBM machines and that it was therefore not necessary for Tetra Fast to be mentioned in Section 8.10 of Form CO. Tetra considers that the Tetra Fast technology replaces an external piece of equipment supplying the pressure necessary for blowing the bottle within the SBM machine. The traditional means of achieving this pressure relies on compressed air produced by a compressor (most often supplied by a party other than the SBM machine suppliers), whilst the Tetra Fast technology relies on the pressure generated by explosive combustion of a hydrogen/oxygen mixture.

---
Source: https://www.legislation.gov.uk/eudn/2005/305/division/4/4 (the official version)
Page: https://openlegislation.uk/eu-decision-2005-305/division-4/4
Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Source: legislation.gov.uk, The National Archives.