# Commission Decision of 7 July 2004 imposing fines on an undertaking for supplying incorrect or misleading information in a notification in a merger control proceeding (Case No COMP/M.3255 — Tetra Laval/Sidel) (notified under document number C(2004) 2500) (Only the English version is authentic) (Text with EEA relevance) (2005/305/EC), Division (16)

Extent: E+W+S+N.I.

The Commission considers that this argument is manifestly wrong. It is evident that a technology which brings about a major change in the performance of SBM machines belongs to the affected market for SBM machines as long as the technology is not actually marketed separately (in which case Tetra would have had to submit the information on the basis of a separate technology market). Tetra’s R&D overview for 2000, disclosed only during the Tetra II procedure, shows that Tetra itself saw Tetra Fast as part of the SBM machine market.

---
Source: https://www.legislation.gov.uk/eudn/2005/305/division/4/5 (the official version)
Page: https://openlegislation.uk/eu-decision-2005-305/division-4/5
Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Source: legislation.gov.uk, The National Archives.