# Commission Decision of 7 July 2004 imposing fines on an undertaking for supplying incorrect or misleading information in a notification in a merger control proceeding (Case No COMP/M.3255 — Tetra Laval/Sidel) (notified under document number C(2004) 2500) (Only the English version is authentic) (Text with EEA relevance) (2005/305/EC), Division (31)

Extent: E+W+S+N.I.

Regarding Question 4, it is clear that a full discussion of the future potential competitive environment should have included a detailed explanation of Tetra Fast for both its potential for the application of barrier coatings through the Tetra Fast technology and for their enhanced aseptic quality. Gas barrier technology, as acknowledged by Tetra is of relevance for packaging of juices and aseptic filling is of importance for both the packaging of juices and LDP. Tetra’s response was incorrect in that it did not give the Commission a full picture of the future potential for development of competition on the market.

---
Source: https://www.legislation.gov.uk/eudn/2005/305/division/5/10/2 (the official version)
Page: https://openlegislation.uk/eu-decision-2005-305/division-5/10/2
Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Source: legislation.gov.uk, The National Archives.