# Commission Decision of 7 July 2004 imposing fines on an undertaking for supplying incorrect or misleading information in a notification in a merger control proceeding (Case No COMP/M.3255 — Tetra Laval/Sidel) (notified under document number C(2004) 2500) (Only the English version is authentic) (Text with EEA relevance) (2005/305/EC), Division (25)

Extent: E+W+S+N.I.

Tetra relies on what it considers to be the different character between Form CO and a Request for Information. In Tetra’s opinion, Form CO sets out a series of pre-defined factual questions to allow for an assessment of the completeness of the notification, whereas the contents of Requests for Information, are drawn up depending on the Commission’s information requirements at a given moment in its decision-making process and must be construed taking into account this context and typically requires the addressees to express subjective views as to the issues raised. In addition, Tetra considers that Requests for Information are of a less formal character and provide a means of discussion and exchange of views, for the Commission and the parties. According to Tetra, this is recognised in Article 14(1)(c) which sanctions the provision of incorrect information but not of misleading information whereas Article 14(1)(b) sanctions the provision of incorrect or misleading information. On this basis, Tetra considers that the scope for imposing sanctions under Article 14(1)(c) is significantly more limited than under Article 14(1)(b).

---
Source: https://www.legislation.gov.uk/eudn/2005/305/division/5/5 (the official version)
Page: https://openlegislation.uk/eu-decision-2005-305/division-5/5
Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Source: legislation.gov.uk, The National Archives.