OpenLegislation

Division OBSERVATIONS

United Kingdom

Original text. Later amendments are not shown.

  1. 1..

    The scope of the examination has been limited by the following:

    1. (a)

      …

    2. (b)

      …

    3. (c)

      etc

    (Indicate any obstacles encountered in the examination, for example systemic problems, management weaknesses, lack of audit trail, lack of supporting documentation, cases under legal proceedings, etc; estimate the amounts of expenditure affected by these obstacles and the corresponding Community co-financing)

  2. 2..

    The examination, together with the conclusions of other national or Community controls to which I have had access, reveal a low/high (indicate as appropriate; if high please explain) frequency of errors/irregularities. The errors/irregularities reported have been satisfactorily dealt with by the responsible authorities and they do not appear to affect the amount of Community co-financing payable, with the following exceptions:

    1. (a)

      …

    2. (b)

      …

    3. (c)

      etc

    (Indicate the errors/irregularities which have not been satisfactorily dealt with, and for each case, the possible systemic character and extent of the problem and the amounts of Community co-financing which appear to be affected)