# Commission Decision of 25 June 2007 on the compatibility with Community law of measures taken by France pursuant to Article 3a(1) of Council Directive 89/552/EEC on the coordination of certain provisions laid down by law, regulation or administrative action in Member States concerning the pursuit of television broadcasting activities (2007/480/EC), Introduction: Introductory text

Extent: E+W+S+N.I.

Commission Decision
of 25 June 2007
on the compatibility with Community law of measures taken by France pursuant to Article 3a(1) of Council Directive 89/552/EEC on the coordination of certain provisions laid down by law, regulation or administrative action in Member States concerning the pursuit of television broadcasting activities
(2007/480/EC)
THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,
Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,
Having regard to Council Directive 89/552/EEC of 3 October 1989 on the coordination of certain provisions laid down by law, regulation or administrative action in Member States concerning the pursuit of television broadcasting activities, and in particular Article 3a(2) thereof,
Having regard to the opinion of the Committee established pursuant to Article 23a of Directive 89/552/EEC,
Whereas:
(1)
By letter of 30 December 2003, France notified to the Commission measures to be taken pursuant to Article 3a(1) of Directive 89/552/EEC.
(2)
The Commission verified, within three months from this notification, whether such measures are compatible with Community law, in particular as regards the proportionality of the measures and the transparency of the national consultation procedure.
(3)
In its examination, the Commission took into consideration the available data on the French media landscape.
(4)
The list of events of major importance for society included in the French measures was drawn up in a clear and transparent manner and a far-reaching consultation process had been launched in France.
(5)
The Commission was satisfied that the events listed in the French measures met at least two of the following criteria considered to be reliable indicators of the importance of events for society: (i) a special general resonance within the Member State, and not simply a significance to those who ordinarily follow the sport or activity concerned; (ii) a generally recognised, distinct cultural importance for the population in the Member State, in particular as a catalyst of cultural identity; (iii) involvement of the national team in the event concerned in the context of a competition or tournament of international importance; and (iv) the fact that the event has traditionally been broadcast on free television and has commanded large television audiences.
(6)
A number of the events listed in the French measures, including the summer and winter Olympic Games, the opening match, semi-finals and final of the football World Cup as well as the semi-finals and final of the European Football Championship, fall within the category of events traditionally considered to be of major importance for society, as referred to explicitly in recital 18 of Directive 97/36/EC. These events have a special general resonance in France, as they are particularly popular with the general public, not just with those who usually follow sport events.
(7)
The other listed football events, including the official matches of the French national football team in the FIFA calendar, the final of the UEFA Cup, where a French club involved in one of the French championships is playing, the French football Cup final and the final of the football Champions’ League, have a special general resonance in France, as football is the most popular sport in that country.
(8)
Rugby is an important sport and attracts a considerable audience, particularly in the south-west of France and thus a large part of the country. The French Rugby Championship final, the European Rugby Cup final where a French club involved in one of the French championships is playing, the Six Nations rugby tournament, and the semi-finals and final of the Rugby World Cup therefore have a special general resonance in France.
(9)
The listed tennis events have a special general resonance in France as tennis is the most important individual sport in that Member State.
(10)
The French Formula 1 Grand Prix has a special general resonance in France in view of the importance of this event for the French racing car industry.
(11)
The Tour de France (men) has a special general resonance in France and has a generally recognised, distinct cultural importance for the population in France as a catalyst of cultural identity, due to the fact that it is the most important cycling event in the world. It reflects the popularity of cycling in France and has an important impact on tourism as an occasion to promote the country.
(12)
The Paris-Roubaix cycling race has a special general resonance in France as it forms part of the French heritage.
(13)
The listed basketball events have a generally recognised, distinct cultural importance for the population in France, in particular as a catalyst of cultural identity, given that basketball is an important factor for social cohesion in France.
(14)
The listed handball events involve the French national team in a major international tournament and therefore have considerable cultural importance for the French population.
(15)
The World Athletics Championship has a generally recognised, distinct cultural importance for the French population, in particular as a catalyst of cultural identity, especially in view of the usual success of French participants.
(16)
The listed events have traditionally been broadcast on free television and have commanded large television audiences.
(17)
The French measures appear proportionate so as to justify a derogation from the fundamental EC Treaty freedom to provide services on the basis of an overriding reason of public interest, which is to ensure wide public access to broadcasts of events of major importance for society.
(18)
The French measures are compatible with EC competition rules in that the definition of qualified broadcasters for the broadcasting of listed events is based on objective criteria that allow actual and potential competition for the acquisition of the rights to broadcast these events. In addition, the number of listed events is not disproportionate so as to distort competition on the downstream free television and pay television markets.
(19)
After communication by the Commission to the other Member States of the French measures and consultation of the Committee established pursuant to Article 23a of Directive 89/552/EEC, the Director-General for Education and Culture informed France, by letter of 7 April 2004, that the European Commission did not intend to object to the measures notified.
(20)
The measures were adopted by France on 22 December 2004.
(21)
It follows from the judgment of the Court of First Instance in Case T-33/01, Infront WM v Commission, that the declaration that measures taken pursuant to Article 3a(1) of Directive 89/552/EEC are compatible with Community law constitutes a decision within the meaning of Article 249 of the EC Treaty, which must therefore be adopted by the Commission. Accordingly, it is necessary to declare by this Decision that the measures notified by France are compatible with Community law. The measures, as finally taken by France and set out in the Annex to this Decision, should be published in the Official Journal of the European Union in accordance with Article 3a(2) of Directive 89/552/EEC,
HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

---
Source: https://www.legislation.gov.uk/eudn/2007/480/introduction (the official version)
Page: https://openlegislation.uk/eu-decision-2007-480/introduction
Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Source: legislation.gov.uk, The National Archives.