OpenLegislation

Appendix ANNEX 1

United Kingdom

Original text. Later amendments are not shown.

MODEL DESCRIPTION OF MANAGEMENT AND CONTROL SYSTEMS

  • Initial version

  • Revised version (number, date dd/mm/year) following dialogue with the Commission

  • Version revised for other reasons

  • MEMBER STATE:

    FUND(S):

    MAIN CONTACT POINT:

    THE INFORMATION PROVIDED DESCRIBES THE SITUATION ON: …

    1.

    IDENTIFICATION OF THE DESIGNATED AUTHORITIES

    1.1.

    General information on the designated authorities

    1.1.1.

    Short description of the choices made on the designation of the different authorities

    1.1.2.

    Indication of whether these management and control systems are operational

    If not, indication of the date when they will be operational

    1.1.3.

    Indication of whether these management and control systems have been accredited by the Commission for other Community financial instruments (if applicable)

    1.2.

    Organisation chart(s) of the entire body(-ies) within which the designated authorities are functioning

    1.3.

    Responsible authority

    1.3.1.

    The date and form of the formal designation of the responsible authority

    1.3.2.

    Legal status of the responsible authority

    1.3.3.

    Specification of the functions carried out directly by the responsible authority and (if applicable and/or foreseen) by other bodies under the responsibility of the responsible authority (outsourcing of tasks, excluding the tasks entrusted to the delegated authority(ies) under point 1.4)

    1.3.4.

    Organisation chart and specification of the functions of the units (including the indicative number of posts allocated)

    1.3.5.

    Information whether the responsible authority can also act as executing body for the projects co-financed by the Fund

    1.3.6.

    If the responsible authority is the same for more than one of the four Funds, a description of the common functions and systems

    1.4.

    The delegated authority(ies)

    1.4.1.

    The reasons for establishing any delegated authority

    1.4.2.

    The date and form of the formal designation of the delegated authority(ies)

    1.4.3.

    Legal status of the delegated authority(ies)

    1.4.4.

    Specification of the functions carried out directly by the delegated authority(ies) and (if applicable and/or foreseen) by other bodies under the responsibility of the delegated authority(ies) (outsourcing of tasks)

    1.4.5.

    Organisation chart and specification of the functions of the units (including indicative number of posts allocated)

    1.4.6.

    Information whether delegated authority(ies) can also act as executing body for the projects co-financed by the Fund

    1.4.7.

    If the delegated authority(ies) is (are) the same for more than one of the four Funds, a description of the common functions and systems

    1.5.

    Certifying authority

    1.5.1.

    The date and form of the formal designation of the certifying authority

    1.5.2.

    Legal status of the certifying authority

    1.5.3.

    Specification of the functions carried out directly by the certifying authority and (if applicable and/or foreseen) by other bodies under the responsibility of the certifying authority (outsourcing of tasks)

    1.5.4.

    Organisation chart and specification of the functions of the units (including indicative number of posts allocated)

    1.5.5.

    If the certifying authority is the same for more than one of the four Funds, a description of the common functions and systems

    1.6.

    Audit authority

    1.6.1.

    The date and form of the formal designation of the audit authority

    1.6.2.

    Legal status of the audit authority

    1.6.3.

    Specification of the functions carried out directly by the audit authority and (if applicable and/or foreseen) by other bodies under the responsibility of the audit authority (outsourcing of tasks)

    1.6.4.

    Organisation chart and specification of the functions of the units (including indicative number of posts allocated)

    1.6.5.

    Staff qualifications for the audit authority and (if applicable and/or foreseen) of the other bodies expected to carry out audit work (outsourcing of tasks)

    1.6.6.

    If the audit authority is the same for more than one of the four Funds, a description of the common functions and systems

    1.6.7.

    If a responsible authority can also act as executing body for the projects co-financed by the Fund, a description of arrangements ensuring the independent position of the audit authority in accordance with Article 8.

    Guidance for sections 2–4

    First part of each table

    The description of the processes should include the tasks to be carried out by each of the designated authorities (or bodies under their responsibility) and the interaction between them. The description should be concise but nevertheless allow a clear understanding of how the processes would work in practice.

    Second part of each table

    The checklist should be completed by indicating whether each target has been achieved or not and providing any relevant information. If the target has not been achieved, please provide an explanation and, if relevant, indicate the expected date for completion.

    If procedures are formalised, a reference to the document should be included.

    2.

    FUNCTIONING OF DESIGNATED AUTHORITIES

    2.1. Designation and supervision of the designated authorities
    Short description of the process of setting up each of the designated authorities[The description should include all authorities]
    Key targetsAchieved?Comments
    1Rules governing the relations of the Member State with the designated authorities identify the respective responsibilitiesY/N
    2Member State have provided guidance to the designated authorities to ensure sound financial management (through training and/or manuals)Y/N
    3Each authority will inform their staff of the mission statement of the organisation as well as their job description and expected resultsY/N
    4Steps have been taken to ensure that the different authorities are adequately staffed in terms of numbers, seniority and experience in order to carry out their functionsY/N
    2.2. Separation of functions
    Short description of the arrangements defined to ensure a proper separation of functions[The description should include all authorities]
    Key targetsAchieved?Comments
    1Rules are defined to ensure a proper separation of functions between actors within the responsible authority for the signature of contracts/grant agreementsY/N
    2Rules are defined to ensure a proper separation of functions between actors within the responsible authority for the initiation, verification and approval of financial transactionsY/N
    3The audit authority will be functionally independent of the responsible authority and the certifying authorityY/N
    4The certifying authority will not be involved in the selection, implementation and financial transactions related to Community resourcesY/N
    2.3. Monitoring of delegated authority(ies) — if applicable
    Short description of the process[This description should include the responsible authority and the delegated authority(ies)]
    Key targetsAchieved?Comments
    1The tasks to be delegated are clearly definedY/N
    2Procedures are established concerning the delegated tasks and their compliance with the rules defined in the basic act/implementing rules has been checkedY/N
    3Supervisory controls will take place to ensure that the tasks are carried out according to established proceduresY/N
    2.4. Monitoring of other tasks not carried out by the authorities themselves — if applicable
    Short description of the process[The description should include all authorities]
    Key targetsAchieved?Comments
    1In case of bodies acting under the responsibility of the responsible authority (and not considered as delegated authorities), supervisory mechanisms are in place to ensure sound financial managementY/N
    2In case of outsourcing of audit activities and in case of bodies acting under the responsibility of the audit authority, supervisory mechanisms are in place to ensure a common audit methodology and consistency of the audit workY/N
    3In case of outsourcing of certifying activities and in case of bodies acting under the responsibility of the certifying authority, supervisory mechanisms are in place to ensure a common approach to certificationY/N
    4In case of outsourcing to private bodies without a public-service mission, mechanisms are defined to ensure that the tasks which may be entrusted do not include the exercise of public authority or require the use of discretionary powers of judgmentY/N

    3.

    OPERATIONAL AND FINANCIAL PROCESSES

    3.1. Establishing multiannual programmes
    Short description of the process[This description should include the responsible authority and the delegated authority(ies)]
    Key targetsAchieved?Comments
    1Arrangements are foreseen to ensure the implementation of the principle of partnership in accordance with current national rules and practicesY/N
    2Procedures are defined to check that the multiannual programme is consistent with the strategic guidelines and complies with Community law, in particular with Community law aiming at ensuring the free movement of persons in conjunction with the directly related flanking measures with respect to external border controls, asylum and immigrationY/N
    3The multiannual programme will be approved by a duly authorised personY/N
    3.2. Establishing annual programmes
    Short description of the process[This description should include the responsible authority and the delegated authority(ies)]
    Key targetsAchieved?Comments
    1

    Procedures are established to ensure:

    • consistency between the annual programmes and the multiannual programme,

    • the eligibility of the actions envisaged in the annual programmes,

    • consistency and complementarity of these actions with other national and Community instruments,

    • the compliance with the rules concerning co-financing percentage,

    • consistency with the priorities/specific priorities stated in the strategic guidelines

    Y/N
    2Procedures are established to enable the revision of an annual programme in case of duly substantiated emergency situations as described in the basic act (if applicable)Y/N
    3Procedures are established to enable the submission of a revision of an annual programme when required under Article 23(1) of this decisionY/N
    4Any modification to the financial breakdown of an annual programme and the reasons for it is documentedY/N
    5Any modification in the implementation of the annual programme not relating to the financial breakdown (e.g. on nature and timing of the calls for proposals or the scope of technical assistance) and the reason for it is documentedY/N
    3.3. Establishing the audit strategy and the annual audit plans
    Short description of the process[This description concerns the audit authority]
    Key targetsAchieved?Comments
    1Rules are defined to ensure a transparent and appropriate communication from the responsible authority to the audit authority on management procedures implemented and on projects prior to and throughout the programming periodY/N
    2Procedures are established to define annual audit plans (to be annexed each year to the audit strategy) and to send them to the Commission in time (if applicable)Y/N
    3The audit strategy and the annual audit plans are approved by a duly authorised personY/N
    3.4. Responsible authority acting as an executing body — if applicable
    Short description of the reasons leading the responsible authority to implement projects directly and the specific arrangements foreseen to strengthen the management and control systems[The description should include all authorities]
    Key targetsAchieved?Comments
    1The justification of the need for the responsible authority to implement projects will be documented and endorsed at the appropriate levelY/N
    2Specific arrangements are put in place to ensure that the nature and the objectives of the projects comply with the provisions defined for the FundY/N
    3Specific arrangements are put in place in order to prevent conflict of interest for the projects implemented by the responsible authorityY/N
    4Specific arrangements are put in place to ensure the principle of value for money is respected in the implementation of projects by the responsible authorityY/N
    5Procedures are defined to ensure that the contractual terms governing these projects are clear and complete in particular with regard to the financing conditions, the payment terms, the eligibility rules and the obligations regarding operational and financial reportingY/N
    6Specific arrangements are put in place in order to ensure that the main functions of the responsible authority as provided for in the basic act are not affected in relation to the projects implemented by the responsible authorityY/N
    7When the responsible authority acts as an executing body, the audit authority is located in another body than the responsible authority (if not, please describe the additional guarantees put in place to ensure the proper independence of the audit authority)Y/N
    8The audit strategy will cover the specific risks which may be related to the implementation of projects by the responsible authorityY/N
    3.5. Selection and implementation of the projects (Responsible authority acting as an awarding body)
    Short description of the process[This description should include the responsible authority and the delegated authority(ies)]
    Key targetsAchieved?Comments
    1In the case of call for proposals (or tenders), rules are defined to ensure open competition and adequate publicityY/N
    2Selection criteria will comply with the minimum criteria defined in the basic actY/N
    3Procedures are defined for the receipt of proposals (or tenders)Y/N
    4Procedures are defined to ensure that the proposals (or tenders) are assessed against the predefined rules and criteria in a transparent and non-discriminatory mannerY/N
    5The award decisions and the contracts/grant agreements will be approved by a duly authorised personY/N
    6Procedures are defined to ensure adequate ex post information on the results of the selection process to the applicantsY/N
    7Procedures are defined to ensure the monitoring of the implementation of grant agreements/contracts according to the contractual termsY/N
    3.6. Monitoring of the projects implemented by the final beneficiaries
    Short description of the process[This description should include the responsible authority and the delegated authority(ies)]
    Key targetsAchieved?Comments
    1Key operational and financial indicators will be established, monitored and communicated to the responsible authority for each projectY/N
    2On-the-spot verifications by the responsible authority are foreseen to allow monitoring (of both the operational and financial aspects) of the projectsY/N
    3The responsible authority will ensure that final beneficiaries make use of an appropriate accounting system in computerised formY/N
    4The responsible authority will ensure that final beneficiaries implement the provisions on the visibility of the EU fundingY/N
    3.7. Financial management of the project
    Short description of the process[Involves the responsible authority and the delegated authority(ies)]
    Key targetsAchieved?Comments
    1Financial transactions will be approved by duly authorised personsY/N
    2

    Prior to making any payments/recoveries, verifications will be carried out in particular in order to monitor:

    • the accuracy and the regularity of the payment request, with regard to the eligibility rules for the Fund(s),

    • that products and/or services co-financed by the project have actually been delivered,

    • the accuracy, completeness and effective payment of other contributions received from public or private resources,

    • that the results of any audit activity have been taken into account

    Y/N
    3Verifications will be carried out in order to have a reasonable assurance of the legality and regularity of the underlying transactionsY/N
    4Supervisory controls will be carried out throughout the programming period to ensure that the established financial procedures are respectedY/N
    5Verifications will be performed on the complementarity with other Community financial programmes in order to avoid double fundingY/N
    3.8. Irregularities, corrections and recoveries
    Short description of the process[This description should include the responsible authority, the delegated authority(ies) and the certifying authority]
    Key targetsAchieved?Comments
    1Definitions of irregularities are established and comply with the Community requirementsY/N
    2Mechanisms are in place to ensure that irregularities can be detected in due time and immediate corrective measure are takenY/N
    3Procedures are in place to ensure that the Commission is kept informed of irregularities detected, and if appropriate, of any corrective measures taken in accordance with the obligations set out in this decisionY/N
    4Procedures are in place to ensure a proper follow-up of recovery orders issued and, if applicable, of default interestY/N
    5In case recovery orders cannot be cashed in, causes will be identified to evaluate whether Member States should reimburse the funds to the Community budget or notY/N
    3.9. Preparation and implementation of audit missions
    Short description of the process[This description should include the audit authority and, as potential auditees, the responsible authority and the delegated authority(ies) and, as recipient of the conclusions, the certifying authority]
    Key targetsAchieved?Comments
    1The audit practice is in line with internationally accepted standardsY/N
    2An audit manual is established for use by the auditors on the basis of the requirements defined in the basic actY/N
    3Audits will be carried out to verify the effective functioning of the management and control systemsY/N
    4The checks to be carried on the eligible expenditure will be based on an appropriate sample, and will consist of at least 10 % of eligible expensesY/N
    5The verifications on eligible expenses will verify at least the compliance, effectiveness and efficiency of the following elements: selection procedure, objectives of the project, reality of the achievements, eligibility of the expenses, valid supporting documents for the expenses, national co-financing, audit trailY/N
    6A follow-up of earlier recommendations will take place on a regular basisY/N
    7The projects implemented by the responsible authority will be subject to robust scrutinyY/N
    3.10. Audit report on annual programmes and related declarations
    Short description of the process[This description should involved the audit authority]
    Key targetsAchieved?Comments
    1Procedures are established to consolidate the conclusions of the systems audit and the audit of projects for each annual programmeY/N
    2Checks will be performed to assess the validity of the requests for paymentY/N
    3Further examination will be launched in case of systemic errors or errors over the materiality threshold are detectedY/N
    4The report and the related declarations will be approved by a duly authorised personY/N
    3.11. Certification of expenditure
    Short description of the process[Involves primarily the certifying authority but also the responsible authority and the delegated authority(ies)]
    Key targetsAchieved?Comments
    1Procedures are established to ensure that the necessary information is received from the responsible authority for the purpose of certificationY/N
    2Procedures are established to ensure that the audit report on each annual programme and the related declarations are received from the audit authorityY/N
    3Procedures are established to ensure that recoveries are taken into account for the final declaration of expenditure and to follow on-going legal proceedings or administrative appeals with suspensive effect regarding recoveriesY/N
    4Verifications will be performed to ensure the accuracy and completeness of the declaration of expenditure, (in particular, on any interest generated by the pre-financing received from the Commission as well as its effective use as national contribution)Y/N
    5In case of local currency, the methods used for the calculation in euro comply with the rules defined by the CommissionY/N
    3.12. Evaluation of the programme
    Short description of the process[Involves the responsible authority and the delegated authority(ies)]
    Key targetsAchieved?Comments
    1The guidance documents from the Commission on evaluations are disseminated widely and made available to all potential final beneficiaries and other interested partiesY/N
    2The key operational and financial indicators provided by the final beneficiaries to measure the achievements of the project will be recordedY/N
    3The responsible authority (and/or delegated authorities) will ensure that the indicators provided are appropriate to measure the outcome and results of each projectY/N
    4Procedures are in place to ensure that the necessary evaluation will be carried out as required by the basic actY/N

    4.

    INFORMATION MANAGEMENT

    4.1. Documentation on the procedures
    Short description of the process[Involves all authorities]
    Key targetsAchieved?Comments
    1The authorities will ensure that the established procedures referred to in Article 7 of this decision comply with national and Community law (e.g. public procurement, accounting rules, etc.)Y/N
    2The procedures are approved by a duly authorised personY/N
    3The established procedures set out clear instructions concerning each of the main operations and explain the decision-making circuits concerning the performance of functionsY/N
    4Arrangements are in place to ensure that all relevant staff is informed of the established proceduresY/N
    5Where appropriate, these procedures include the use of check-lists summarising the key controls to be performedY/N
    6Arrangements are in place to ensure the protection of personal dataY/N
    4.2. Accounting and bookkeeping
    Short description of the process[Involves the responsible authority, the delegated authority(ies) and the certifying authority]
    Key targetsAchieved?Comments
    1

    Arrangements are in place to ensure that accounting data is complete, reliable and correct. In particular, the accounting system will allow:

    • a full traceability of the Community resources at the level of the final beneficiaries and projects,

    • the identification of any interest generated by the pre-financing received from the Commission,

    • the identification of recovery orders issued and if applicable, whether they have been cashed

    Y/N
    2The accounting and financial reporting system complies with the national data protection legislationY/N
    3The accounting and financial reporting system to be used will be in computerised formY/N
    4A back-up system exists to guarantee the continuity of operations should the need ariseY/N
    5In case of local currency, the methods used for the calculation in euro comply with the rules defined by the CommissionY/N
    4.3. Reporting to the Commission
    Short description of the process[Involves all authorities]
    Key targetsAchieved?Comments
    1Reporting obligations have been identified as well as the implications for resourcesY/N
    2The established procedures allow proper, timely and complete input by the designated authoritiesY/N
    3Reports are approved by a duly authorised personY/N
    4.4. Audit trail
    Short description of the process[Involves all authorities]
    Where are the following documents kept?Body/Unit in chargeHow long for?
    Description of the management and control systems including manual(s) of procedures
    Audit strategy
    National multiannual programme and possible revisions
    National annual programmes and possible revisions
    European Commission Decisions on multiannual and annual programmes
    Calls for proposals/calls for tender
    Applicant files/contract files
    Administrative, technical and financial analysis of proposals/tenders received (evaluation grids) and evaluation committee reports
    Funding decisions or rejections
    Project funding agreements
    Financial commitment decisions for each of the projects
    Progress reports and final reports submitted by funding recipients
    Financial reports and payment applications submitted by funded project
    Supporting documents for expenditure and revenue for funded project
    Payments/recovery authorisations for funding (proof of verifications performed)
    Payments/recovery orders for funding
    Proof of payments/recovery of funding
    Documentation related to the sampling methodology for the audit activity
    Reports on audits carried out on projects
    Reports on audits carried out at national level on management and control systems
    Audit reports on annual programmes
    Audit opinions on the management and control systems
    Audit declarations on the validity of the requests for payment
    Requests for payment sent to the European Commission
    Certification of expenditure sent to the European Commission
    Progress implementation reports sent to the European Commission
    Final implementation reports sent to the European Commission
    Proof of payment received from the European Commission
    Evaluation reports sent to the European Commission

    5.

    APPROVAL OF THE DESCRIPTION OF THE MANAGEMENT AND CONTROL SYSTEMS

    AuthorityDeclarationDate and signature
    Responsible authorityI certify the accuracy and completeness of the information about the identification and internal control systems of the responsible authority

    Name:

    Function:

    Date:

    signature

    Certifying authorityI certify the accuracy and completeness of the information about the identification and internal control systems of the certifying authority

    Name:

    Function:

    Date:

    signature

    Audit authority

    I certify the accuracy and completeness of the information about the identification and internal control systems of the audit authority

    and

    I can confirm that what has been described provides a reliable picture of all the management and control systems

    Name:

    Function:

    Date:

    signature