{
  "url": "https://openlegislation.uk/eu-decision-2010-152/annex",
  "json_url": "https://openlegislation.uk/eu-decision-2010-152/annex.json",
  "legislation": "eudn/2010/152",
  "legislation_title": "Commission Decision of 11 March 2010 excluding from European Union financing certain expenditure incurred by the Member States under the Guarantee Section of the European Agricultural Guidance and Guarantee Fund (EAGGF), under the European Agricultural Guarantee Fund (EAGF) and under the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) (notified under document C(2010) 1317) (Only the Bulgarian, Danish, Dutch, English, Estonian, Finnish, French, German, Greek, Hungarian, Italian, Polish, Portuguese, Slovak, Spanish and Swedish texts are authentic) (2010/152/EU)",
  "legislation_url": "https://openlegislation.uk/eu-decision-2010-152",
  "path": "annex",
  "kind": "annex",
  "number": null,
  "heading": null,
  "text": "BUDGET ITEM 6701\nMS\nMeasure\nFY\nReason for correction\nType\n%\nCurrency\nAmount\nDeductions already made\nFinancial impact\nBE\nFinancial audit — Overshooting\n2008\nOvershooting of financial ceilings\none-off\nEUR\n–593,3\n–593,3\n0,0\nTotal BE\n–593,3\n–593,3\n0,0\nBG\nFinancial audit — payment deadlines\n2008\nNon-respect of payment deadlines\none-off\nEUR\n–10 969,94\n–10 969,94\n0,0\nTotal BG\n–10 969,94\n–10 969,94\n0,0\nCY\nDirect Payments\n2005\nLaw quality and incorrect timing of on-the-spot checks, deficiencies in GAEC criteria controls Weak general control environment\nflat-rate\n10,0\nEUR\n–756 946,49\n0,0\n–756 946,49\nTotal CY\n–756 946,49\n0,0\n–756 946,49\nDE\nDirect Payments\n2006\nWrong application of reductions and exclusions\none-off\nEUR\n–6 712 699,14\n0,0\n–6 712 699,14\nDE\nFinancial audit — payment deadlines\n2008\nNon-respect of payment deadlines\none-off\nEUR\n–37 390,29\n–37 390,29\n0,0\nTotal DE\n–6 750 089,43\n–37 390,29\n–6 712 699,14\nDK\nCross Compliance\n2006\nInsufficient quantity and quality of key and ancillary controls\nflat-rate\n5,0\nDKK\n–10 302 438,99\n0,0\n–10 302 438,99\nDK\nCross Compliance\n2006\nInsufficient quantity and quality of key and ancillary controls\none-off\nDKK\n–495 596,61\n0,0\n–495 596,61\nDK\nCross Compliance\n2007\nCompensation following adjustments made by the MS in annual declarations\nDKK\n16 823,86\n0,0\n16 823,86\nDK\nCross Compliance\n2007\nInsufficient quantity and quality of key and ancillary controls\nflat-rate\n5,0\nEUR\n–2 912 878,81\n0,0\n–2 912 878,81\nDK\nMeat Premiums — Bovines\n2003\nInsufficient quantity of on-the-spot checks\nflat-rate\n2,0\nDKK\n–8 883 403,83\n0,0\n–8 883 403,83\nDK\nMeat Premiums — Bovines\n2005\nInsufficient quantity of on-the-spot checks\nflat-rate\n2,0\nDKK\n–40 706,28\n0,0\n–40 706,28\nDK\nMeat Premiums — Bovines\n2005\nNon-respect of definition of suckler cow\none-off\nEUR\n–229 600,0\n0,0\n–229 600,0\nDK\nMeat Premiums — Bovines\n2004\nInsufficient quantity of on-the-spot checks\nflat-rate\n2,0\nDKK\n–7 410,47\n0,0\n–7 410,47\nDK\nMeat Premiums — Bovines\n2004\nCompensation following adjustments made by the MS in annual declarations\nEUR\n1 363,55\n0,0\n1 363,55\nDK\nMeat Premiums — Bovines\n2004\nNon-respect of definition of suckler cow\none-off\nEUR\n–164 800,0\n0,0\n–164 800,0\nDK\nMeat Premiums — Bovines\n2005\nCompensation following adjustments made by the MS in annual declarations\nEUR\n2 519,93\n0,0\n2 519,93\nDK\nMeat Premiums — Bovines\n2006\nCompensation following adjustments made by the MS in annual declarations\nDKK\n9 238,2\n0,0\n9 238,2\nTotal DK (EUR)\n–3 303 395,33\n0,0\n–3 303 395,33\nTotal DK (DKK)\n–19 703 494,12\n0,0\n–19 703 494,12\nEE\nFinancial audit — Overshooting\n2008\nOvershooting of financial ceilings\none-off\nEUR\n–30 242,24\n–30 242,24\n0,0\nTotal EE\n–30 242,24\n–30 242,24\n0,0\nES\nClearance of accounts\n2004\nUnrecoverable debt\none-off\nEUR\n–12 466,39\n0,0\n–12 466,39\nES\nCross Compliance\n2006\nLack of on-the-spot checks\nflat-rate\n10,0\nEUR\n–2 226 313,51\n0,0\n–2 226 313,51\nES\nCross Compliance\n2007\nLack of on-the-spot checks\nflat-rate\n10,0\nEUR\n–18 615,65\n0,0\n–18 615,65\nES\nFinancial audit — payment deadlines\n2008\nNon-respect of payment deadlines\none-off\nEUR\n–3 919 231,56\n–4 103 814,39\n184 582,83\nES\nFinancial audit — Overshooting\n2008\nIneligible expenditure, milk levy and failure to repay amounts due to cross-compliance\none-off\nEUR\n8 318,45\n8 318,45\n0,0\nES\nFinancial audit — Overshooting\n2008\nOvershooting of financial ceilings\none-off\nEUR\n–823 800,98\n–823 800,98\n0,0\nES\nFruit and Vegetables — Operational Programmes\n2004\nIneligible cost of environmental management of packaging\none-off\nEUR\n–3 929 919,02\n0,0\n–3 929 919,02\nES\nFruit and Vegetables — Operational Programmes\n2005\nIneligible cost of environmental management of packaging\none-off\nEUR\n–14 719 270,21\n0,0\n–14 719 270,21\nES\nFruit and Vegetables — Operational Programmes\n2006\nIneligible cost of environmental management of packaging\none-off\nEUR\n–17 337 716,29\n0,0\n–17 337 716,29\nES\nFruit and Vegetables — Producer Groups\n2003\nIneligible cost of environmental management of packaging\none-off\nEUR\n–1 243 226,69\n0,0\n–1 243 226,69\nES\nFruit and Vegetables — Producer Groups\n2003\nWeaknesses in the key control (insufficient checks on double funding)\nflat-rate\n5,0\nEUR\n–2 130 607,74\n0,0\n–2 130 607,74\nES\nFruit and Vegetables — Producer Groups\n2004\nIneligible cost of environmental management of packaging\none-off\nEUR\n–1 096 997,97\n0,0\n–1 096 997,97\nES\nFruit and Vegetables — Producer Groups\n2004\nWeaknesses in the key control (insufficient checks on double funding)\nflat-rate\n5,0\nEUR\n–2 496 111,63\n0,0\n–2 496 111,63\nES\nFruit and Vegetables — Producer Groups\n2005\nWeaknesses in the key control (insufficient checks on double funding)\nflat-rate\n5,0\nEUR\n–2 359 546,06\n0,0\n–2 359 546,06\nES\nFruit and Vegetables — Producer Groups\n2006\nWeaknesses in the key control (insufficient checks on double funding)\nflat-rate\n5,0\nEUR\n–2 148 564,48\n0,0\n–2 148 564,48\nES\nHemp — production aid\n1997\nReimbursement following judgment of Court of Justice in the case T-259/05\nflat-rate\n10,0\nEUR\n112 677,49\n0,0\n112 677,49\nES\nHemp — production aid\n1998\nReimbursement following judgment of Court of Justice in the case T-259/05\nflat-rate\n10,0\nEUR\n290 132,36\n0,0\n290 132,36\nES\nHemp — production aid\n1999\nReimbursement following judgment of Court of Justice in the case T-259/05\nflat-rate\n10,0\nEUR\n220,24\n0,0\n220,24\nES\nHemp — production aid\n1999\nReimbursement following judgment of Court of Justice in the case T-259/05\nflat-rate\n25,0\nEUR\n3 135 672,08\n0,0\n3 135 672,08\nES\nHemp — production aid\n2000\nReimbursement following judgment of Court of Justice in the case T-259/05\nflat-rate\n25,0\nEUR\n1 417 423,82\n0,0\n1 417 423,82\nES\nHemp — production aid\n2001\nReimbursement following judgment of Court of Justice in the case T-259/05\nflat-rate\n25,0\nEUR\n331 466,05\n0,0\n331 466,05\nES\nHemp — production aid\n2002\nReimbursement following judgment of Court of Justice in the case T-259/05\nflat-rate\n25,0\nEUR\n–1 014,83\n0,0\n–1 014,83\nTotal ES\n–49 167 492,52\n–4 919 296,92\n–44 248 195,6\nFI\nFinancial audit — Overshooting\n2008\nOvershooting of financial ceilings\none-off\nEUR\n–2 432,42\n–2 432,42\n0,0\nTotal FI\n–2 432,42\n–2 432,42\n0,0\nFR\nClearance of accounts\n2002\nDebts management: non-recovery of debts\none-off\nEUR\n–256 801,47\n0,0\n–256 801,47\nFR\nClearance of accounts\n2002\nOvershooting of ceilings\none-off\nEUR\n–464 310,98\n0,0\n–464 310,98\nFR\nClearance of accounts\n2004\nMost likely error\none-off\nEUR\n–178 075,49\n0,0\n–178 075,49\nFR\nClearance of accounts\n2005\nDebts management: non-recovery of debts\none-off\nEUR\n–66 012,51\n0,0\n–66 012,51\nFR\nClearance of accounts\n2005\nSystematic error\none-off\nEUR\n–62 342,03\n0,0\n–62 342,03\nFR\nDried Fodder\n2005\nInsufficient quantity of samples taken and low quality of their examination\nflat-rate\n2,0\nEUR\n–680 596,08\n0,0\n–680 596,08\nFR\nDried Fodder\n2006\nInsufficient quantity of samples taken and low quality of their examination\nflat-rate\n2,0\nEUR\n–1 514 646,79\n0,0\n–1 514 646,79\nFR\nDried Fodder\n2007\nInsufficient quantity of samples taken and low quality of their examination\nflat-rate\n2,0\nEUR\n–849 968,48\n0,0\n–849 968,48\nFR\nFruit and Vegetables — Operational Programmes\n2006\nIneligible cost of environmental management of packaging Personnel costs too high Insufficient justification for specific costs of certified plants\none-off\nEUR\n–205 654,66\n0,0\n–205 654,66\nFR\nFruit and Vegetables — Operational Programmes\n2007\nIneligible cost of environmental management of packaging Personnel costs too high Insufficient justification for specific costs of certified plants\none-off\nEUR\n–4 402 146,53\n0,0\n–4 402 146,53\nFR\nFruit and Vegetables — Operational Programmes\n2008\nIneligible cost of environmental management of packaging Personnel costs too high Insufficient justification for specific costs of certified plants\none-off\nEUR\n–2 250 805,13\n0,0\n–2 250 805,13\nFR\nMeat Premiums — Bovines\n2003\nWeaknes on the application of sanctions at national level\none-off\nEUR\n–2 175 736,0\n0,0\n–2 175 736,0\nFR\nMeat Premiums — Bovines\n2004\nWeaknes on the application of sanctions at national level\none-off\nEUR\n–1 586 850,0\n0,0\n–1 586 850,0\nFR\nMeat Premiums — Bovines\n2004\nVery weak control environment and absence of the suckler cow status of the herd\nflat-rate\n25,0\nEUR\n–1 825 745,07\n0,0\n–1 825 745,07\nFR\nMeat Premiums — Bovines\n2004\nVery weak control environment\nflat-rate\n10,0\nEUR\n–161 858,24\n0,0\n–161 858,24\nFR\nMeat Premiums — Bovines\n2005\nVery weak control environment and absence of the suckler cow status of the herd\nflat-rate\n25,0\nEUR\n–1 835 682,64\n0,0\n–1 835 682,64\nFR\nMeat Premiums — Bovines\n2005\nVery weak control environment\nflat-rate\n10,0\nEUR\n–171 143,0\n0,0\n–171 143,0\nFR\nMeat Premiums — Bovines\n2006\nVery weak control environment\nflat-rate\n25,0\nEUR\n–8 361,56\n0,0\n–8 361,56\nFR\nMeat Premiums — Bovines\n2006\nVery weak control environment\nflat-rate\n5,0\nEUR\n–86 986,2\n0,0\n–86 986,2\nFR\nMeat Premiums — Bovines\n2006\nVery weak control environment\nflat-rate\n10,0\nEUR\n–722 979,52\n0,0\n–722 979,52\nTotal FR\n–19 506 702,38\n0,0\n–19 506 702,38\nGB\nDirect Payments\n2006\nIncorrect application of reductions and exclusions\none-off\nGBP\n–8 122,33\n0,0\n–8 122,33\nGB\nDirect Payments\n2007\nIncorrect application of reductions and exclusions\none-off\nGBP\n–9 623,98\n0,0\n–9 623,98\nGB\nFinancial audit — payment deadlines\n2008\nNon-respect of payment deadlines\none-off\nEUR\n–14 180 950,72\n–14 311 495,63\n130 544,91\nGB\nFinancial audit — Overshooting\n2008\nOvershooting of financial ceilings\none-off\nEUR\n–262 732,55\n–262 732,55\n0,0\nGB\nRural Development EAGGF Axis 2\n2005\nWeaknesses in key checks and in adminitrative controls Insufficient checks of GAEC criteria and cross-checks with animal database\nflat-rate\n5,0\nGBP\n–36 364,0\n0,0\n–36 364,0\nGB\nRural Development EAGGF Axis 2\n2006\nWeaknesses in key checks and in adminitrative controls Insufficient checks of GAEC criteria and cross-checks with animal database\nflat-rate\n5,0\nGBP\n–3 254 010,0\n0,0\n–3 254 010,0\nTotal GB (GBP)\n–3 308 120,31\n0,0\n–3 308 120,31\nTotal GB (EUR)\n–14 443 683,27\n–14 574 228,18\n130 544,91\nGR\nFood Aid within the Community\n2005\nIneligible costs resulting from late withdrawals and late distribution\none-off\nEUR\n–1 310 306,02\n0,0\n–1 310 306,02\nGR\nFood Aid within the Community\n2006\nIneligible costs resulting from late withdrawals and late distribution\none-off\nEUR\n–6 799 511,68\n0,0\n–6 799 511,68\nGR\nFood Aid within the Community\n2007\nIneligible costs of storage resulting from late withdrawals\none-off\nEUR\n–220 830,34\n0,0\n–220 830,34\nGR\nFruit and Vegetables — Operational Programmes\n2005\nValue of Marketed Production (VMP), used for calculating Community aid, wrongly established\none-off\nEUR\n–38 933,4\n0,0\n–38 933,4\nGR\nFruit and Vegetables — Operational Programmes\n2006\nValue of Marketed Production (VMP), used for calculating Community aid, wrongly established\none-off\nEUR\n–127 757,63\n0,0\n–127 757,63\nGR\nFruit and Vegetables — Operational Programmes\n2007\nValue of Marketed Production (VMP), used for calculating Community aid, wrongly established\none-off\nEUR\n–148 714,8\n0,0\n–148 714,8\nGR\nCotton\n2004\nWeak control system. Deficiencies in the control of area and environmental measures\nflat-rate\n5,0\nEUR\n–12 022,67\n0,0\n–12 022,67\nGR\nCotton\n2004\nOvershooting the production quantities permitted by the Regulations\none-off\nEUR\n–37 392,0\n0,0\n–37 392,0\nGR\nCotton\n2005\nWeak control system. Deficiencies in the control of area and environmental measures\nflat-rate\n5,0\nEUR\n–34 573 887,48\n0,0\n–34 573 887,48\nGR\nCotton\n2005\nOvershooting the production quantities permitted by the Regulations\none-off\nEUR\n–1 284 276,0\n0,0\n–1 284 276,0\nGR\nCotton\n2006\nWeak control system. Deficiencies in the control of area and environmental measures\nflat-rate\n5,0\nEUR\n–68 134 305,29\n0,0\n–68 134 305,29\nGR\nCotton\n2006\nWeak control system. Deficiencies in the control of area and environmental measures\none-off\nEUR\n–1 411 287,0\n0,0\n–1 411 287,0\nGR\nOlive Oil — Consumption Aid\n1996\nReimbursement following judgment of Court of Justice in the case T-243/05\none-off\nEUR\n67 626,66\n0,0\n67 626,66\nGR\nOlive Oil — Consumption Aid\n1997\nReimbursement following judgment of Court of Justice in the case T-243/05\none-off\nEUR\n116 091,92\n0,0\n116 091,92\nGR\nOlive Oil — Consumption Aid\n1998\nReimbursement following judgment of Court of Justice in the case T-243/05\none-off\nEUR\n16 428,1\n0,0\n16 428,1\nGR\nRD Guarantee (area related measures)\n2005\nPersistent weaknesses in IACS system. Deficiencies in control reports. Delayed performance of on-the-spot checks\nflat-rate\n10,0\nEUR\n–8 498 907,0\n0,0\n–8 498 907,0\nGR\nRD Guarantee (area related measures)\n2006\nPersistent weaknesses in IACS system. Deficiencies in control reports. Delayed performance of on-the-spot checks\nflat-rate\n5,0\nEUR\n–349 453,0\n0,0\n–349 453,0\nGR\nRD Guarantee (area related measures)\n2006\nPersistent weaknesses in IACS system. Deficiencies in control reports. Delayed performance of on-the-spot checks\nflat-rate\n10,0\nEUR\n–6 168 408,0\n0,0\n–6 168 408,0\nGR\nRD Guarantee new measures\n2005\nPersistent weaknesses in IACS system. Deficiencies in control reports. Delayed performance of on-the-spot checks\nflat-rate\n10,0\nEUR\n–690 219,0\n0,0\n–690 219,0\nGR\nRD Guarantee new measures\n2006\nPersistent weaknesses in IACS system. Deficiencies in control reports. Delayed performance of on-the-spot checks\nflat-rate\n10,0\nEUR\n–2 816 729,0\n0,0\n–2 816 729,0\nTotal GR\n–132 422 793,63\n0,0\n–132 422 793,63\nHU\nRural Development Guarantee\n2005\nReimbursement due to double correction (under Commission Decision 2009/721/EC and recovery order GFO.09.025 concerning TRDI program 2004HU06GDO001)\none-off\nHUF\n42 638 662,0\n0,0\n42 638 662,0\nTotal HU\n42 638 662,0\n0,0\n42 638 662,0\nIE\nDairy premium\n2005\nNon-application of aid reductions towards farmers lodging their aid applications after deadline\none-off\nEUR\n–367 181,29\n0,0\n–367 181,29\nIE\nFinancial audit — payment deadlines\n2008\nNon-respect of payment deadlines\none-off\nEUR\n–152 676,24\n–152 676,24\n0,0\nTotal IE\n–519 857,53\n–152 676,24\n–367 181,29\nIT\nFinancial audit — payment deadlines\n2008\nIneligible expenditure\none-off\nEUR\n–9 345,0\n–9 345,0\n0,0\nIT\nFinancial audit — payment deadlines\n2008\nNon-respect of payment deadlines\none-off\nEUR\n–1 877 812,65\n–1 877 812,65\n0,0\nIT\nFruit and Vegetables — Operational Programmes\n2007\nIneligible expenditure\nEUR\n–18 750,0\n0,0\n–18 750,0\nTotal IT\n–1 905 907,65\n–1 887 157,65\n–18 750,0\nLU\nFinancial audit — Overshooting\n2008\nOvershooting of financial ceilings\none-off\nEUR\n–1 273,9\n–1 273,9\n0,0\nLU\nMeat Premiums — Bovines\n2001\nLack of adminitrative controls concerning retention period. Lack of on-the-spot controls. Inappropriate calculation of sanctions\none-off\nEUR\n–18 292,47\n0,0\n–18 292,47\nLU\nMeat Premiums — Bovines\n2002\nLack of adminitrative controls concerning retention period. Lack of on-the-spot controls. Inappropriate calculation of sanctions\none-off\nEUR\n–3 973,52\n0,0\n–3 973,52\nLU\nMeat Premiums — Bovines\n2003\nLack of adminitrative controls concerning retention period. Lack of on-the-spot controls. Inappropriate calculation of sanctions\none-off\nEUR\n–150 184,7\n0,0\n–150 184,7\nLU\nMeat Premiums — Bovines\n2004\nLack of adminitrative controls concerning retention period. Lack of on-the-spot controls. Inappropriate calculation of sanctions\none-off\nEUR\n–190 950,23\n0,0\n–190 950,23\nTotal LU\n–364 674,82\n–1 273,9\n–363 400,92\nNL\nClearance of accounts\n2000-04\nTested population errors\none-off\nEUR\n–481 542,94\n0,0\n–481 542,94\nNL\nClearance of accounts\n2004\nTested population errors\none-off\nEUR\n–46 697,81\n0,0\n–46 697,81\nNL\nClearance of accounts\n2005\nTested population errors\none-off\nEUR\n–402 695,0\n0,0\n–402 695,0\nNL\nExport Refunds\n2003\nInsuficient number of sustitution checks performed\nflat-rate\n2,0\nEUR\n–4 037 899,76\n0,0\n–4 037 899,76\nNL\nExport Refunds\n2003\nInsuficient number of sustitution checks performed\nflat-rate\n5,0\nEUR\n–4 083 396,09\n0,0\n–4 083 396,09\nNL\nExport Refunds\n2004\nInsuficient number of sustitution checks performed\nflat-rate\n2,0\nEUR\n–1 062 605,2\n0,0\n–1 062 605,2\nNL\nExport Refunds\n2004\nInsuficient number of sustitution checks performed\nflat-rate\n5,0\nEUR\n–1 193 119,34\n0,0\n–1 193 119,34\nNL\nExport Refunds\n2005\nInsuficient number of sustitution checks performed\nflat-rate\n5,0\nEUR\n–31 195,1\n0,0\n–31 195,1\nNL\nFinancial audit — Overshooting\n2007\nOvershooting of financial ceilings\none-off\nEUR\n–914,7\n0,0\n–914,7\nNL\nFinancial audit — Overshooting\n2008\nIneligible expenditure\none-off\nEUR\n–91 807,12\n–91 807,12\n0,0\nNL\nMeat Premiums — Bovines\n2004\nWeaknesses in the management of the herd registers and of the supporting documents\nflat-rate\n2,0\nEUR\n–3 214 925,84\n0,0\n–3 214 925,84\nNL\nMeat Premiums — Bovines\n2005\nWeaknesses in the management of the herd registers and of the supporting documents\nflat-rate\n2,0\nEUR\n–3 559 908,74\n0,0\n–3 559 908,74\nNL\nMeat Premiums — Bovines\n2006\nWeaknesses in the management of the herd registers and of the supporting documents\nflat-rate\n2,0\nEUR\n–19 171,1\n0,0\n–19 171,1\nTotal NL\n–18 225 878,74\n–91 807,12\n–18 134 071,62\nPL\nDirect payments\n2006\nLand parcel system not completely vectorised.\nAcceptance of ineligible land for payments.\nToo low number of on-the-spot checks in regions with high error rates. Erroneous application of provisions of intentional non-compliance.\nOne-off\nPLN\n– 87 534 475,32\n0,0\n– 87 534 475,32\nPL\nDirect payments\n2006\nLand parcel system not completely vectorised.\nAcceptance of ineligible land for payments.\nToo low number of on-the-spot checks in regions with high error rates. Erroneous application of provisions of intentional non-compliance.\nFlat rate\n5,0\nPLN\n– 11 811 934,21\n0,0\n– 11 811 934,21\nPL\nDirect payments\n2007\nLand parcel system not completely vectorised.\nAcceptance of ineligible land for payments.\nToo low number of on-the-spot checks in regions with high error rates. Erroneous application of provisions of intentional non-compliance.\nFlat rate\n5,0\nEUR\n– 2 293 418,87\n0,0\n– 2 293 418,87\nPL\nDirect payments\n2007\nLand parcel system not completely vectorised.\nAcceptance of ineligible land for payments.\nToo low number of on-the-spot checks in regions with high error rates. Erroneous application of provisions of intentional non-compliance.\nOne-off\nEUR\n– 23 290 577,94\n0,0\n– 23 290 577,94\nPL\nFinancial audit — Overshooting\n2008\nOvershooting of financial ceilings\nOne-off\nEUR\n0,0\n– 1 894 213,61\n1 894 213,61\nTotal PL (PLN)\n– 99 346 409,53\n0,0\n– 99 346 409,53\nTotal PL (EUR)\n– 25 583 996,81\n– 1 894 213,61\n– 23 689 783,2\nSE\nCross Compliance\n2006\nInsufficient quantity and quality of key and ancillary controls\nflat-rate\n5,0\nSEK\n–9 218 825,98\n0,0\n–9 218 825,98\nSE\nCross Compliance\n2007\nInsufficient quantity and quality of key and ancillary controls\nflat-rate\n5,0\nEUR\n–2 137 710,17\n0,0\n–2 137 710,17\nSE\nFinancial audit — payment deadlines\n2008\nNon-respect of payment deadlines\none-off\nEUR\n–35 584,38\n–35 584,38\n0,0\nSE\nFinancial audit — Overshooting\n2008\nOvershooting of financial ceilings\none-off\nEUR\n–44,84\n–44,84\n0,0\nTotal SE (SEK)\n–9 218 825,98\n0,0\n–9 218 825,98\nTotal SE (EUR)\n–2 173 339,39\n–35 629,22\n–2 137 710,17\nBUDGET ITEM 6500\nMS\nMeasure\nFY\nReason for correction\nType\n%\nCurrency\nAmount\nDeductions already made\nFinancial impact\nPL\nRural Development EAGGF Transitional Instrument (2000-2006)\n2005\nLand parcel system not completely vectorised.\nAcceptance of ineligible land for payments.\nToo low number of on-the-spot checks in regions with high error rates. Erroneous application of provisions of intentional non-compliance.\nFlat rate\n5,0\nPLN\n– 1 408 667,08\n0,0\n– 1 408 667,08\nPL\nRural Development EAGGF Transitional Instrument (2000-2006)\n2006\nLand parcel system not completely vectorised.\nAcceptance of ineligible land for payments.\nToo low number of on-the-spot checks in regions with high error rates. Erroneous application of provisions of intentional non-compliance.\nOne-off\nPLN\n– 18 510 167,85\n0,0\n– 18 510 167,85\nPL\nRural Development EAGGF Transitional Instrument (2000-2006)\n2006\nLand parcel system not completely vectorised.\nAcceptance of ineligible land for payments.\nToo low number of on-the-spot checks in regions with high error rates. Erroneous application of provisions of intentional non-compliance.\nFlat rate\n5,0\nPLN\n– 69 151 379,37\n0,0\n– 69 151 379,37\nPL\nRural Development EAGGF Transitional Instrument (2000-2006)\n2007\nLand parcel system not completely vectorised.\nAcceptance of ineligible land for payments.\nToo low number of on-the-spot checks in regions with high error rates. Erroneous application of provisions of intentional non-compliance.\nOne-off\nPLN\n– 12 943 389,24\n0,0\n– 12 943 389,24\nPL\nRural Development EAGGF Transitional Instrument (2000-2006)\n2007\nLand parcel system not completely vectorised.\nAcceptance of ineligible land for payments.\nToo low number of on-the-spot checks in regions with high error rates. Erroneous application of provisions of intentional non-compliance.\nFlat rate\n5,0\nPLN\n– 78 434 429,08\n0,0\n– 78 434 429,08\nTotal PL (PLN)\n– 180 448 032,62\n0,0\n– 180 448 032,62\nGrand total (PLN)\n– 279 794 442,15\n0,0\n– 279 794 442,15\nGrand total (EUR)\n– 25 583 996,81\n– 1 894 213,61\n– 23 689 783,2\nMS\nProgramme\nFY\nReason for correction\nType\n%\nCurrency\nAmount\nDeductions already made\nFinancial impact\nSK\nRD Guarantee (programme 2004 SK 06 GDO 001)\n2005\nIncorrect control procedure resulting in insufficient controls within chosen samples\nflat-rate\n2,0\nEUR\n–1 249 561,0\n0,0\n–1 249 561,0\nSK\nRD Guarantee (programme 2004 SK 06 GDO 001)\n2006\nIncorrect control procedure resulting in insufficient controls within chosen samples\nflat-rate\n2,0\nEUR\n–1 784 419,0\n0,0\n–1 784 419,0\nSK\nRD Guarantee (programme 2004 SK 06 GDO 001)\n2007\nIncorrect control procedure resulting in insufficient controls within chosen samples\nflat-rate\n2,0\nEUR\n–933,0\n0,0\n–933,0\nTotal SK\n–3 034 913,0\n0,0\n–3 034 913,0\nBUDGET ITEM 6711\nMS\nProgramme\nFY\nReason for correction\nType\n%\nCurrency\nAmount\nDeductions already made\nFinancial impact\nGB\nRural Development Programme 2007UK06RPO001\n2007\nWeaknesses in key checks and in adminitrative controls Insufficient checks of GAEC criteria and cross-checks with animal database\nflat-rate\n5,0\nEUR\n–39 244,0\n0,0\n–39 244,0\nTotal GB\n–39 244,0\n0,0\n–39 244,0\nBUDGET ITEM 05 07 01 07\nMS\nProgramme\nFY\nReason for correction\nType\n%\nCurrency\nAmount\nDeductions already made\nFinancial impact\nHU\nFinancial audit — Overshooting\n2008\nIneligible expenditure\none-off\nEUR\n–5 622,81\n–5 622,81\n0,0\nHU\nFinancial audit — Overshooting\n2008\nOvershooting of financial ceilings\none-off\nEUR\n21 511,01\n–5 432,55\n26 943,56\nTotal HU (EUR)\n15 888,2\n–11 055,36\n26 943,56\nPT\nDirect Payments\n2004\nReimbursement following judgment of Court of Justice in the case T-50/07\none-off\nEUR\n1 983 698,0\n0,0\n1 983 698,0\nPT\nFlax — Production Aid\n2001\nReimbursement following judgment of Court of Justice in the case T-183/06\none-off\nEUR\n3 135 348,71\n3 135 348,71\nTotal PT\n5 119 046,71\n0,0\n5 119 046,71",
  "extent": "E+W+S+N.I.",
  "status": null,
  "version": "current",
  "annotations": [
    {
      "type": "F",
      "label": "F1",
      "text": "Substituted by Commission Implementing Decision of 20 July 2011 correcting Decision 2010/152/EU excluding from European Union financing certain expenditure incurred by the Member States under the Guarantee Section of the European Agricultural Guidance and Guarantee Fund (EAGGF), under the European Agricultural Guarantee Fund (EAGF) and under the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) (notified under document C(2011) 5139) (Only the Polish text is authentic) (2011/447/EU)."
    },
    {
      "type": "F",
      "label": "F2",
      "text": "Inserted by Commission Implementing Decision of 20 July 2011 correcting Decision 2010/152/EU excluding from European Union financing certain expenditure incurred by the Member States under the Guarantee Section of the European Agricultural Guidance and Guarantee Fund (EAGGF), under the European Agricultural Guarantee Fund (EAGF) and under the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) (notified under document C(2011) 5139) (Only the Polish text is authentic) (2011/447/EU)."
    }
  ],
  "outstanding_effects": [],
  "provenance": {
    "source": "legislation.gov.uk",
    "source_url": "https://www.legislation.gov.uk/eudn/2010/152/annex",
    "retrieved_at": "2026-11-01T15:16:10.021571+00:00"
  },
  "licence": "Open Government Licence v3.0",
  "licence_url": "https://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/version/3/",
  "attribution": "Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Source: legislation.gov.uk, The National Archives."
}