{
  "url": "https://openlegislation.uk/eu-decision-2010-767/annex/division-EUROPEAN/division-3/division-3.1.3",
  "json_url": "https://openlegislation.uk/eu-decision-2010-767/annex/division-EUROPEAN/division-3/division-3.1.3.json",
  "legislation": "eudn/2010/767",
  "legislation_title": "Commission Decision of 9 December 2010 amending Decision C(2007) 2286 on the adoption of ERC Rules for the submission of proposals and the related evaluation, selection and award procedures for indirect actions under the Ideas Specific Programme of the Seventh Framework Programme (2007 to 2013) (Text with EEA relevance) (2010/767/EU)",
  "legislation_url": "https://openlegislation.uk/eu-decision-2010-767",
  "path": "annex/division/EUROPEAN/division/3/division/3.1.3",
  "kind": "division",
  "number": "3.1.3",
  "heading": "Terms of appointment, Code of conduct and Conflict of interest",
  "text": "This section addresses the way in which independent experts are appointed by the ERCEA to assist in the peer review evaluation of proposals submitted under the Ideas Specific Programme. The same procedure may be applied mutatis mutandis by the ERCEA for the appointment of experts for the tasks within the meaning of Article 27(1) of the Rules for Participation.\nThe ERCEA issues an appointment letter to be signed by the independent expert, based on the models approved by the Commission. The appointment letter sets the framework of the relationship between an independent expert and the ERCEA under which he or she may be called to provide expertise to assist the ERC.\nThis appointment letter presents the General Conditions applying to independent experts, in particular, it establishes a Code of conduct for independent experts in peer review evaluations, annexed to the appointment letter, the essential provisions regarding confidentiality, conflict of interest and specifies the treatment of personal data.\nThe appointment will be effective upon the signature of the appointment letter by the independent expert and the ERCEA.\nAssignments of tasks for Panel Chairs, Panel Members, Panel evaluators and Independent observers are entitled to financial compensation. In that case the appointment letter will provide the general conditions for compensation.\nFor referees, the assignments of tasks are not eligible for financial compensation.\nIn the context of each task assignment, all independent experts are required to confirm that they have no conflict of interest (disqualifying or potential) for each proposal that they examine. If an independent expert identifies a conflict of interest relating to a proposal, the course of action depends on whether it is a disqualifying or a potential conflict of interest.\nCircumstances in which ‘disqualifying’ and ‘potential’ conflicts of interest may exist are described in the Code of Conduct.\nIndependent experts may not participate in the evaluation of proposals to a call to which he/she has himself/herself submitted a proposal.\nWhen a disqualifying conflict of interest exists an independent expert must not influence the peer review evaluation of the proposal concerned. In particular an independent expert shall then neither assist in the individual assessment (usually remote), nor speak and vote in any Panel discussion related to this proposal. In such a case the independent expert shall leave the room (or electronic forum) when the Panel discusses the individual case of the proposal where such a conflict exists.\nWhen a potential conflict of interest exists, the ERCEA will consider the circumstances of the case and make a decision. It may be decided whether to allow the independent expert to take part in the peer review evaluation of the proposal concerned (the expert must then sign a declaration to that effect) or to exclude him/her in the same manner as for a disqualifying conflict.\nAn expert must declare any known conflicts of interest before a peer review evaluation session.\nIf a hitherto unsuspected conflict becomes apparent during the course of the peer review evaluation, the independent expert must announce the fact immediately to a responsible official. If the conflict is finally found to be a disqualifying one, the independent expert must abstain from further peer review evaluation involving the proposal concerned. Any comments and scores made earlier by that independent expert will be discounted. If necessary, the independent expert will be replaced.\nIf an independent expert knowingly conceals a disqualifying or potential conflict of interest, and this is discovered during the peer review evaluation session, the independent expert will be immediately excluded, and the sanctions foreseen in the appointment letter will apply. Any peer review evaluation session results in which he or she has participated will be declared null and void, and the proposal(s) concerned will be re-evaluated.\nBy analogy with article 265a(3) of the Implementing Rules to the Financial Regulation, a breach of the Code of Conduct or other serious misconduct by the independent expert may be qualified as grave professional misconduct and may lead to the exclusion of this independent expert from the list of independent experts to be appointed by the ERCEA. Pursuant to such exclusion, the independent expert will be removed from the database and barred from re-registering for the duration of the exclusion.",
  "extent": "E+W+S+N.I.",
  "status": null,
  "version": "current",
  "annotations": [
    {
      "type": "footnote",
      "label": "f1",
      "text": "OJ L 357, 31.12.2002, p. 1."
    }
  ],
  "outstanding_effects": [],
  "provenance": {
    "source": "legislation.gov.uk",
    "source_url": "https://www.legislation.gov.uk/eudn/2010/767/annex/division/EUROPEAN/division/3/division/3.1.3",
    "retrieved_at": "2026-11-01T15:15:56.395033+00:00"
  },
  "licence": "Open Government Licence v3.0",
  "licence_url": "https://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/version/3/",
  "attribution": "Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Source: legislation.gov.uk, The National Archives."
}