{
  "url": "https://openlegislation.uk/eu-decision-2011-301/annex",
  "json_url": "https://openlegislation.uk/eu-decision-2011-301/annex.json",
  "legislation": "eudn/2011/301",
  "legislation_title": "Council Implementing Decision 2011/301/CFSP of 23 May 2011 implementing Decision 2010/639/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against certain officials of Belarus",
  "legislation_url": "https://openlegislation.uk/eu-decision-2011-301",
  "path": "annex",
  "kind": "annex",
  "number": null,
  "heading": null,
  "text": "PERSONS REFERRED TO IN ARTICLE 1\nNamesTranscription of Belarusian spellingTranscription of Russian spelling\nNames (Belarusian spelling)\nNames (Russian spelling)\nPlace and date of birth\nPosition\n1.\nShykarou, Uladzislau\nShikarov, Vladislav\nШыкароў Уладзiслаў\nШикаров Владислав\nJudge of the Zheleznodorozhny District Court of Vitebsk. He sentenced several protesters during the appeal trial, despite the fact that they were not found guilty by the Court of First Instance.\n2.\nMerkul, Natallia Viktarauna\nMerkul, Natalia Viktorovna\n(Merkul, Natalya Viktorovna\nМеркуль Наталля Вiктараўна\nМеркуль Наталья Викторовна\nDate of birth:\n13.11.1964\nDirector of the Secondary School in Talkov City, Pukhovichi District. On 27 January 2011 she fired Natalia Ilinich, a highly regarded teacher of the secondary school for her political views and for her participation at the 19 December 2010 events.\n3.\nAkulich, Sviatlana Rastsislavauna\nOkulich, Svetlana Rostislavovna\nАкулiч Святлана Расцiславаўна\nОкулич Светлана Ростиславовна\nDate of birth:\n27.08.1948 or 1949\nJudge of the Pukhovichi District Court. She unlawfully rejected the motion of Natalia Ilinich to restore her position as teacher of the Secondary School in Talkov City.\n4.\nPykina, Natallia\nPykina, Natalia\n(Pykina, Natalya)\nПыкiна Наталля\nПыкина Наталья\nJudge of the Partizanski District Court dealing with Likhovid's case. She sentenced Mr. Likhovid, an activist of ‘The Movement for Freedom’, to 3 and a half year in prison of strict regime.\n5.\nMazouka, Siarhei\nMazovka, Sergei (Mazovko, Sergey)\nМазоўка Сяргей\nМазовка Сергей/Мазовко Сергей\nProsecutor of the Dashkevich-Lobov case. Dmitri Dashkevich and Eduard Lobov, activists of the Young Front, were sentenced to several years of imprisonment for ‘hooliganism’. The real reason for their imprisonment was that both actively participated in the electoral campaign in December 2010, supporting one of the candidates of the opposition.\n6.\nAliaksandrau, Dzmitry Piatrovich\nAleksandrov, Dmitri Petrovich\nАляксандраў Дзмiтрый Пятровiч\nАлександров Дмитрий Петрович\nJudge of the Supreme Economic Court. He sustained the ban of the independent ‘Autoradio’ station. (The ‘Autoradio’ was banned for ‘having broadcasted calls for mass disturbances during the presidential campaign in December 2010’. Upon a contract in force, the radio was transmitting the electoral program of Mr. Sannikov, one of the opposition candidates, saying ‘the future will be decided not in the kitchens, but on the square!’).\n7.\nVakulchyk, Valery\nVakulchik, Valeri\nВакульчык Валерый\nВакульчик Валерий\nChief of the Analytical Center of the Presidential Administration, responsible for telecommunication, including monitoring, filtering, bugging, controlling and intervening different communication channels, for example the internet.\n8.\nChatviartkova, Natallia\nChetvertkova, Natalia\n(Chetvertkova, Natalya)\nЧатвярткова Наталля\nЧетверткова Наталья\nJudge of the Partizanski District Court of Minsk. She dealt with the trial of ex presidential candidate Andrei Sannikov, civil society activist Ilia Vasilevich, Fedor Mirzoianov, Oleg Gnedchik and Vladimir Yeriomenok. Her way of conducting the trial is a clear violation of the Code of Penal Procedure. She sustained the use of evidences and testimonies irrelevant to the accused persons against them.\n9.\nBulash, Ala\nBulash, Alla\nБулаш Ала\nБулаш Алла\nJudge of the Oktiabrski (Kastrichnitski) District Court of Minsk. She dealt with the case of Pavel Vinogradov, Dmitri Drozd, Ales Kirkevich, Andrei Protasenia, Vladimir Homichenko. Her way of conducting the trial is a clear violation of the Code of Penal Procedure. She sustained the use of evidences and testimonies irrelevant to the accused persons against them.\n10.\nBarovski Aliaksandr Genadzevich\nBorovski Aleksandr Gennadievich\nБароўскi Аляксандр Генадзевiч\nБоровский Александр Геннадиевич\nPublic Prosecutor of the Oktiabrski (Kastrichnitski) District Court of Minsk. He dealt with the case of Pavel Vinogradov, Dmitri Drozd, Ales Kirkevich, Vladimir Homichenko. The accusation presented by him has a clear and imminent political motivation and it is a clear violation of the Code of Penal Procedure. It is based on wrong classification of the events of 19th December 2010, not sustained by evidences, proofs and testimonies of witnesses.\n11.\nSimanouski Dmitri Valerevich\nSimanovski Dmitri Valerievich\nСiманоўскi Дмiтрый Валер’евiч\nСимановский Дмитрий Валериевич\nPublic Prosecutor of the Pervomaiski District Court of Minsk. He dealt with the case of Dmitri Bondarenko. The accusation presented by him has a clear and imminent political motivation and it is a clear violation of the Code of Penal Procedure. It is based on wrong classification of the events of 19th December 2010, not sustained by evidences, proofs and testimonies of witnesses.\n12.\nBrysina, Zhanna\nBrysina, Zhanna (Brisina, Zhanna)\nБрысiна Жанна\nБрысина Жанна/Брисина Жанна\nJudge of the Zavodskoi District Court of Minsk dealing with the case of Khalip Irina, Martselev Sergei, Severinets Pavel, outstanding civil society representatives. Her way of conducting the trial is a clear violation of the Code of Penal Procedure. She sustained the use of evidences and testimonies irrelevant to the accused persons against them.\n13.\nZhukovski, Sergei Konstantynovych\nЖукоўскi Сяргей Канстанцiнавiч\nЖуковский, Сергей Константинович\nPublic Prosecutor of the Zavodskoi District Court of Minsk dealing with the case of Khalip Irina, Martselev Sergei, Severinets Pavel, outstanding civil society representatives. The accusation presented by him has a clear and imminent political motivation and it is a clear violation of the Code of Penal Procedure. It is based on wrong classification of the events of 19th December 2010, not sustained by evidences, proofs and testimonies of witnesses.",
  "extent": "E+W+S+N.I.",
  "status": null,
  "version": "current",
  "annotations": [],
  "outstanding_effects": [],
  "provenance": {
    "source": "legislation.gov.uk",
    "source_url": "https://www.legislation.gov.uk/eudn/2011/301/annex",
    "retrieved_at": "2026-11-01T15:15:47.145644+00:00"
  },
  "licence": "Open Government Licence v3.0",
  "licence_url": "https://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/version/3/",
  "attribution": "Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Source: legislation.gov.uk, The National Archives."
}