{
  "url": "https://openlegislation.uk/eu-decision-2013-123/annex",
  "json_url": "https://openlegislation.uk/eu-decision-2013-123/annex.json",
  "legislation": "eudn/2013/123",
  "legislation_title": "Commission Implementing Decision of 26 February 2013 on excluding from European Union financing certain expenditure incurred by the Member States under the Guarantee Section of the European Agricultural Guidance and Guarantee Fund (EAGGF), under the European Agricultural Guarantee Fund (EAGF) and under the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) (notified under document C(2013) 981) (Only the Bulgarian, Czech, Danish, Dutch, English, Finnish, French, German, Greek, Hungarian, Italian, Lithuanian, Maltese, Polish, Romanian, Slovak, Slovenian, Spanish and Swedish texts are authentic) (2013/123/EU)",
  "legislation_url": "https://openlegislation.uk/eu-decision-2013-123",
  "path": "annex",
  "kind": "annex",
  "number": null,
  "heading": null,
  "text": "Member State\nMeasure\nFinancial Year\nReason\nType\n%\nCurrency\nAmount\nDeductions\nFinancial impact\nBUDGET ITEM: 6701\nBE\nCross Compliance\n2006\nGAEC not implemented, partial on-the-spot controls, claim year 2005\nFLAT RATE\n5,0 %\nEUR\n-93 217,1\n0,0\n-93 217,1\nBE\nCross Compliance\n2007\nGAEC not implemented, partial on-the-spot controls, claim year 2005\nFLAT RATE\n5,0 %\nEUR\n152,33\n0,0\n152,33\nBE\nCross Compliance\n2007\nGAEC not implemented, partial on-the-spot controls, claim year 2006\nFLAT RATE\n5,0 %\nEUR\n-869 463,15\n0,0\n-869 463,15\nBE\nCross Compliance\n2008\nGAEC not implemented, partial on-the-spot controls, claim year 2005\nFLAT RATE\n5,0 %\nEUR\n4,89\n0,0\n4,89\nBE\nCross Compliance\n2008\nGAEC not implemented, partial on-the-spot controls, claim year 2006\nFLAT RATE\n5,0 %\nEUR\n252,09\n0,0\n252,09\nBE\nCross Compliance\n2008\nGAEC not implemented, partial on-the-spot controls, claim year 2007\nFLAT RATE\n5,0 %\nEUR\n-1 481 485,19\n0,0\n-1 481 485,19\nBE\nCross Compliance\n2009\nGAEC not implemented, partial on-the-spot controls, Claim 2005\nFLAT RATE\n5,0 %\nEUR\n28,08\n0,0\n28,08\nBE\nCross Compliance\n2009\nGAEC not implemented, partial on-the-spot controls, claim year 2006\nFLAT RATE\n5,0 %\nEUR\n19,78\n0,0\n19,78\nBE\nCross Compliance\n2009\nGAEC not implemented, partial on-the-spot controls, claim year 2007\nFLAT RATE\n5,0 %\nEUR\n49,34\n0,0\n49,34\nBE\nCross Compliance\n2010\nGAEC not implemented, partial on-the-spot controls, claim year 2007\nFLAT RATE\n5,0 %\nEUR\n-70,55\n0,0\n-70,55\nTOTAL BE\nEUR\n-2 443 729,48\n0,0\n-2 443 729,48\nCY\nFinancial audit - Overshooting\n2011\nexceeding of ceilings\nONE-OFF\nEUR\n-26,69\n-26,69\n0,0\nTOTAL CY\nEUR\n-26,69\n-26,69\n0,0\nCZ\nCross Compliance\n2007\nGAEC non defined, weaknesses in evaluation of non compliances, claim year 2006\nFLAT RATE\n5,0 %\nEUR\n-985 525,73\n0,0\n-985 525,73\nCZ\nCross Compliance\n2008\nGAEC non defined, weaknesses in evaluation of non compliances, claim year 2006\nFLAT RATE\n5,0 %\nEUR\n-355,61\n0,0\n-355,61\nCZ\nCross Compliance\n2008\nGAEC non defined, weaknesses in evaluation of non compliances, claim year 2007\nFLAT RATE\n5,0 %\nEUR\n-1 901 569,16\n0,0\n-1 901 569,16\nCZ\nCross Compliance\n2009\nGAEC non defined, weaknesses in evaluation of non compliances, claim year 2006\nFLAT RATE\n5,0 %\nEUR\n-19,89\n0,0\n-19,89\nCZ\nCross Compliance\n2009\nGAEC non defined, weaknesses in evaluation of non compliances, claim year 2007\nFLAT RATE\n5,0 %\nEUR\n-1 546,95\n0,0\n-1 546,95\nCZ\nCross Compliance\n2009\nGAEC non defined, weaknesses in evaluation of non compliances, claim year 2008\nFLAT RATE\n5,0 %\nEUR\n-2 366 879,57\n0,0\n-2 366 879,57\nTOTAL CZ\nEUR\n-5 255 896,91\n0,0\n-5 255 896,91\nDK\nIrregularities\n2011\ndeficiencies in the recovery of a debt case\nONE-OFF\nDKK\n-142 645,0\n0,0\n-142 645,0\nTOTAL DK\nDKK\n-142 645,0\n0,0\n-142 645,0\nES\nEntitlements\n2007\nforage area non-inclusion in the calculation of the reference area/ amounts\nFLAT RATE\n5,0 %\nEUR\n-1 969 526,34\n0,0\n-1 969 526,34\nES\nEntitlements\n2007\ndeficiencies in the national reserve allocation for the investments into olive sector\nFLAT RATE\n5,0 %\nEUR\n-1 435 445,92\n0,0\n-1 435 445,92\nES\nEntitlements\n2007\ndeficiencies in the calculation of payment entitlements for bovine premium\nONE-OFF\nEUR\n-718 490,48\n0,0\n-718 490,48\nES\nEntitlements\n2007\nwrong application of the exceptional circumstances clause in sugar sector\nONE-OFF\nEUR\n-107 390,07\n0,0\n-107 390,07\nES\nEntitlements\n2008\nforage area non-inclusion in the calculation of the reference area/ amounts\nFLAT RATE\n5,0 %\nEUR\n-2 140 711,78\n0,0\n-2 140 711,78\nES\nEntitlements\n2008\ndeficiencies in the national reserve allocation for the investments into olive sector\nFLAT RATE\n5,0 %\nEUR\n-1 441 201,28\n0,0\n-1 441 201,28\nES\nEntitlements\n2008\ndeficiencies in the calculation of payment entitlements for bovine premium\nONE-OFF\nEUR\n-721 414,45\n0,0\n-721 414,45\nES\nEntitlements\n2008\nwrong application of the exceptional circumstances clause in sugar sector\nONE-OFF\nEUR\n-136 846,5\n0,0\n-136 846,5\nES\nEntitlements\n2009\ndeficiencies in the national reserve allocation for the investments into olive sector\nFLAT RATE\n5,0 %\nEUR\n-1 453 007,15\n0,0\n-1 453 007,15\nES\nEntitlements\n2009\nforage area non-inclusion in the calculation of the reference area/ amounts\nFLAT RATE\n10,0 %\nEUR\n-5 060 486,51\n0,0\n-5 060 486,51\nES\nEntitlements\n2009\ndeficiencies in the calculation of payment entitlements for bovine premium\nONE-OFF\nEUR\n-687 715,79\n0,0\n-687 715,79\nES\nEntitlements\n2009\nwrong application of the exceptional circumstances clause in sugar sector\nONE-OFF\nEUR\n-157 667,86\n0,0\n-157 667,86\nES\nExport refunds - Non-Annex I\n2002\ndeficient ex ante checks on beef, weaknesses in execution of physical checks, inadequate checks on production and stock of sugar, advance notice of physical checks given to the exporters\nFLAT RATE\n25,0 %\nEUR\n-451 439,06\n0,0\n-451 439,06\nES\nExport refunds - Non-Annex I\n2002\ndeficient ex ante checks on beef, weaknesses in execution of physical checks, inadequate checks on production and stock of sugar, advance notice of physical checks given to the exporters\nONE-OFF\nEUR\n-8 255 792,17\n0,0\n-8 255 792,17\nES\nExport refunds - Non-Annex I\n2003\ndeficient ex ante checks on beef, weaknesses in execution of physical checks, inadequate checks on production and stock of sugar, advance notice of physical checks given to the exporters\nFLAT RATE\n2,0 %\nEUR\n-625 835,59\n0,0\n-625 835,59\nES\nExport refunds - Non-Annex I\n2003\ndeficient ex ante checks on beef, weaknesses in execution of physical checks, inadequate checks on production and stock of sugar, advance notice of physical checks given to the exporters\nFLAT RATE\n10,0 %\nEUR\n-283 466,31\n0,0\n-283 466,31\nES\nExport refunds - Non-Annex I\n2003\ndeficient ex ante checks on beef, weaknesses in execution of physical checks, inadequate checks on production and stock of sugar, advance notice of physical checks given to the exporters\nFLAT RATE\n25,0 %\nEUR\n-637 325,71\n0,0\n-637 325,71\nES\nExport refunds - Non-Annex I\n2003\ndeficient ex ante checks on beef, weaknesses in execution of physical checks, inadequate checks on production and stock of sugar, advance notice of physical checks given to the exporters\nONE-OFF\nEUR\n-10 428 368,99\n0,0\n-10 428 368,99\nES\nExport refunds - Non-Annex I\n2004\ndeficient ex ante checks on beef, weaknesses in execution of physical checks, inadequate checks on production and stock of sugar, advance notice of physical checks given to the exporters\nFLAT RATE\n2,0 %\nEUR\n-543 032,76\n0,0\n-543 032,76\nES\nExport refunds - Non-Annex I\n2004\ndeficient ex ante checks on beef, weaknesses in execution of physical checks, inadequate checks on production and stock of sugar, advance notice of physical checks given to the exporters\nFLAT RATE\n2,0 %\nEUR\n-612 356,11\n0,0\n-612 356,11\nES\nExport refunds - Non-Annex I\n2004\ndeficient ex ante checks on beef, weaknesses in execution of physical checks, inadequate checks on production and stock of sugar, advance notice of physical checks given to the exporters\nFLAT RATE\n10,0 %\nEUR\n-85 673,9\n0,0\n-85 673,9\nES\nExport refunds - Non-Annex I\n2004\ndeficient ex ante checks on beef, weaknesses in execution of physical checks, inadequate checks on production and stock of sugar, advance notice of physical checks given to the exporters\nFLAT RATE\n10,0 %\nEUR\n-420 186,53\n0,0\n-420 186,53\nES\nExport refunds - Non-Annex I\n2004\ndeficient ex ante checks on beef, weaknesses in execution of physical checks, inadequate checks on production and stock of sugar, advance notice of physical checks given to the exporters\nFLAT RATE\n25,0 %\nEUR\n-637 325,72\n0,0\n-637 325,72\nES\nExport refunds - Non-Annex I\n2004\ndeficient ex ante checks on beef, weaknesses in execution of physical checks, inadequate checks on production and stock of sugar, advance notice of physical checks given to the exporters\nONE-OFF\nEUR\n-10 428 369,25\n0,0\n-10 428 369,25\nES\nExport refunds - Non-Annex I\n2005\ndeficient ex ante checks on beef, weaknesses in execution of physical checks, inadequate checks on production and stock of sugar, advance notice of physical checks given to the exporters\nFLAT RATE\n2,0 %\nEUR\n-644 593,5\n0,0\n-644 593,5\nES\nExport refunds - Non-Annex I\n2005\ndeficient ex ante checks on beef, weaknesses in execution of physical checks, inadequate checks on production and stock of sugar, advance notice of physical checks given to the exporters\nFLAT RATE\n2,0 %\nEUR\n-1 197 102,19\n0,0\n-1 197 102,19\nES\nExport refunds - Non-Annex I\n2005\ndeficient ex ante checks on beef, weaknesses in execution of physical checks, inadequate checks on production and stock of sugar, advance notice of physical checks given to the exporters\nFLAT RATE\n10,0 %\nEUR\n-29 829,44\n0,0\n-29 829,44\nES\nExport refunds - other\n2005\ndeficient ex ante checks on beef, weaknesses in execution of physical checks, inadequate checks on production and stock of sugar, advance notice of physical checks given to the exporters\nFLAT RATE\n10,0 %\nEUR\n-3 070,58\n0,0\n-3 070,58\nES\nExport refunds - Non-Annex I\n2005\ndeficient ex ante checks on beef, weaknesses in execution of physical checks, inadequate checks on production and stock of sugar, advance notice of physical checks given to the exporters\nFLAT RATE\n10,0 %\nEUR\n-73 612,22\n0,0\n-73 612,22\nES\nExport refunds - Non-Annex I\n2005\ndeficient ex ante checks on beef, weaknesses in execution of physical checks, inadequate checks on production and stock of sugar, advance notice of physical checks given to the exporters\nFLAT RATE\n25,0 %\nEUR\n-79 665,71\n0,0\n-79 665,71\nES\nExport refunds - Non-Annex I\n2005\ndeficient ex ante checks on beef, weaknesses in execution of physical checks, inadequate checks on production and stock of sugar, advance notice of physical checks given to the exporters\nONE-OFF\nEUR\n-1 303 546,06\n0,0\n-1 303 546,06\nES\nExport refunds - Non-Annex I\n2006\ndeficient ex ante checks on beef, weaknesses in execution of physical checks, inadequate checks on production and stock of sugar, advance notice of physical checks given to the exporters\nFLAT RATE\n2,0 %\nEUR\n-114 829,31\n0,0\n-114 829,31\nES\nExport refunds - Live animals\n2006\ndeficient ex ante checks on beef, weaknesses in execution of physical checks, inadequate checks on production and stock of sugar, advance notice of physical checks given to the exporters\nFLAT RATE\n2,0 %\nEUR\n-12 087,3\n0,0\n-12 087,3\nES\nExport refunds - other\n2006\ndeficient ex ante checks on beef, weaknesses in execution of physical checks, inadequate checks on production and stock of sugar, advance notice of physical checks given to the exporters\nFLAT RATE\n2,0 %\nEUR\n-368 662,52\n0,0\n-368 662,52\nES\nExport refunds - Sugar and isoglucose\n2006\ndeficient ex ante checks on beef, weaknesses in execution of physical checks, inadequate checks on production and stock of sugar, advance notice of physical checks given to the exporters\nFLAT RATE\n10,0 %\nEUR\n-1 568 548,49\n0,0\n-1 568 548,49\nES\nExport refunds - Non-Annex I\n2006\ndeficient ex ante checks on beef, weaknesses in execution of physical checks, inadequate checks on production and stock of sugar, advance notice of physical checks given to the exporters\nFLAT RATE\n10,0 %\nEUR\n-1 792,3\n0,0\n-1 792,3\nES\nExport refunds - other\n2006\ndeficient ex ante checks on beef, weaknesses in execution of physical checks, inadequate checks on production and stock of sugar, advance notice of physical checks given to the exporters\nFLAT RATE\n10,0 %\nEUR\n-1 792,3\n0,0\n-1 792,3\nES\nExport refunds - other\n2006\ndeficient ex ante checks on beef, weaknesses in execution of physical checks, inadequate checks on production and stock of sugar, advance notice of physical checks given to the exporters\nONE-OFF\nEUR\n-108 785,66\n0,0\n-108 785,66\nES\nExport refunds - other\n2007\ndeficient ex ante checks on beef, weaknesses in execution of physical checks, inadequate checks on production and stock of sugar, advance notice of physical checks given to the exporters\nFLAT RATE\n2,0 %\nEUR\n-233 717,84\n0,0\n-233 717,84\nES\nExport refunds - Non-Annex I\n2007\ndeficient ex ante checks on beef, weaknesses in execution of physical checks, inadequate checks on production and stock of sugar, advance notice of physical checks given to the exporters\nFLAT RATE\n2,0 %\nEUR\n-9 738,24\n0,0\n-9 738,24\nES\nExport refunds - Sugar and isoglucose\n2007\ndeficient ex ante checks on beef, weaknesses in execution of physical checks, inadequate checks on production and stock of sugar, advance notice of physical checks given to the exporters\nFLAT RATE\n10,0 %\nEUR\n-883 426,04\n0,0\n-883 426,04\nES\nExport refunds - other\n2007\ndeficient ex ante checks on beef, weaknesses in execution of physical checks, inadequate checks on production and stock of sugar, advance notice of physical checks given to the exporters\nFLAT RATE\n10,0 %\nEUR\n-762,46\n0,0\n-762,46\nES\nExport refunds - Non-Annex I\n2007\ndeficient ex ante checks on beef, weaknesses in execution of physical checks, inadequate checks on production and stock of sugar, advance notice of physical checks given to the exporters\nFLAT RATE\n10,0 %\nEUR\n-676,14\n0,0\n-676,14\nES\nExport refunds - Non-Annex I\n2008\ndeficient ex ante checks on beef, weaknesses in execution of physical checks, inadequate checks on production and stock of sugar, advance notice of physical checks given to the exporters\nFLAT RATE\n2,0 %\nEUR\n-47 777,24\n0,0\n-47 777,24\nES\nExport refunds - other\n2008\ndeficient ex ante checks on beef, weaknesses in execution of physical checks, inadequate checks on production and stock of sugar, advance notice of physical checks given to the exporters\nFLAT RATE\n2,0 %\nEUR\n-191 108,96\n0,0\n-191 108,96\nES\nExport refunds - Sugar and isoglucose\n2008\ndeficient ex ante checks on beef, weaknesses in execution of physical checks, inadequate checks on production and stock of sugar, advance notice of physical checks given to the exporters\nFLAT RATE\n10,0 %\nEUR\n-310 869,7\n0,0\n-310 869,7\nES\nExport refunds - other\n2008\ndeficient ex ante checks on beef, weaknesses in execution of physical checks, inadequate checks on production and stock of sugar, advance notice of physical checks given to the exporters\nFLAT RATE\n10,0 %\nEUR\n-1 043,65\n0,0\n-1 043,65\nES\nIrregularities\n2007\nreimbursment due to rectification of the Annex III table for financial year 2006\nONE-OFF\nEUR\n1 998 905,54\n0,0\n1 998 905,54\nES\nIrregularities\n2011\nweakness in the recovery procedure of a debt\nONE-OFF\nEUR\n-214 008,5\n0,0\n-214 008,5\nES\nCross Compliance\n2006\n1 GAEC missing, weaknesses in effectiveness of controls and in application of reduction, claim year 2005\nFLAT RATE\n5,0 %\nEUR\n-2 049 444,68\n-470,83\n-2 048 973,85\nES\nCross Compliance\n2007\n1 GAEC missing, weaknesses in effectiveness of controls and in application of reduction, claim year 2005\nFLAT RATE\n5,0 %\nEUR\n-9 678,62\n0,0\n-9 678,62\nES\nCross Compliance\n2007\n1 GAEC missing, weaknesses in effectiveness of controls and in application of reduction, claim year 2005\nFLAT RATE\n5,0 %\nEUR\n41,87\n0,0\n41,87\nES\nCross Compliance\n2007\n1 GAEC missing, weaknesses in effectiveness of controls and in application of reduction, claim year 2006\nFLAT RATE\n5,0 %\nEUR\n-4 385 343,3\n-387,58\n-4 384 955,72\nES\nCross Compliance\n2007\n1 GAEC missing, weaknesses in effectiveness of controls and in application of reduction, claim year 2006\nFLAT RATE\n5,0 %\nEUR\n181,89\n0,0\n181,89\nES\nCross Compliance\n2008\n1 GAEC missing, weaknesses in effectiveness of controls and in application of reduction, claim year 2005\nFLAT RATE\n5,0 %\nEUR\n-3 017,65\n0,0\n-3 017,65\nES\nCross Compliance\n2008\n1 GAEC missing, weaknesses in effectiveness of controls and in application of reduction, claim year 2005\nFLAT RATE\n5,0 %\nEUR\n0,84\n0,0\n0,84\nES\nCross Compliance\n2008\n1 GAEC missing, weaknesses in effectiveness of controls and in application of reduction, claim year 2006\nFLAT RATE\n5,0 %\nEUR\n-35 502,66\n-2,94\n-35 499,72\nES\nCross Compliance\n2008\n1 GAEC missing, weaknesses in effectiveness of controls and in application of reduction, claim year 2006\nFLAT RATE\n5,0 %\nEUR\n50,65\n0,0\n50,65\nES\nCross Compliance\n2009\n1 GAEC missing, weaknesses in effectiveness of controls and in application of reduction, claim year 2005\nFLAT RATE\n5,0 %\nEUR\n-2 196,12\n0,0\n-2 196,12\nES\nCross Compliance\n2009\n1 GAEC missing, weaknesses in effectiveness of controls and in application of reduction, claim year 2005\nFLAT RATE\n5,0 %\nEUR\n30,8\n0,0\n30,8\nES\nCross Compliance\n2009\n1 GAEC missing, weaknesses in effectiveness of controls and in application of reduction, claim year 2006\nFLAT RATE\n5,0 %\nEUR\n-1 229,56\n0,0\n-1 229,56\nES\nCross Compliance\n2009\n1 GAEC missing, Effectiveness of controls, Application of reduction, claim year 2006\nFLAT RATE\n5,0 %\nEUR\n256,7\n0,0\n256,7\nTOTAL ES\nEUR\n-61 327 066,88\n-861,35\n-61 326 205,53\nFI\nClearance of accounts - Financial Clearance\n2009\nerrors detected during the certification exercise for financial year 2009 in EAGF population\nONE-OFF\nEUR\n-64 880,77\n0,0\n-64 880,77\nTOTAL FI\nEUR\n-64 880,77\n0,0\n-64 880,77\nFR\nFinancial audit - Late payments and payment deadlines\n2011\nLate payments\nONE-OFF\nEUR\n-138 405,9\n-138 405,9\n0,0\nFR\nFinancial audit - Late payments and payment deadlines\n2011\nLate payments\nONE-OFF\nEUR\n-1 233 451,34\n-1 233 451,34\n0,0\nFR\nCertification\n2008\nIneligible expenditure\nONE-OFF\nEUR\n-108 312,83\n0,0\n-108 312,83\nFR\nOther Direct Aid - Ewe and Goats\n2007\nnon-compliant holding register, lack of verification of accuracy of entries to the register, update of the register later than on-the-spot check, non-compliance of the computer database\nFLAT RATE\n2,0 %\nEUR\n-1 552 358,26\n-9 314,14\n-1 543 044,12\nFR\nOther Direct Aid - Ewe and Goats\n2008\nnon-compliant holding register, lack of verification of accuracy of entries to the register, update of the register later than on-the-spot check, non-compliance of the computer database\nFLAT RATE\n2,0 %\nEUR\n-1 492 340,47\n0,0\n-1 492 340,47\nFR\nOther Direct Aid - Ewe and Goats\n2009\nnon-compliant holding register, lack of verification of accuracy of entries to the register, update of the register later than on-the-spot check, non-compliance of the computer database\nFLAT RATE\n2,0 %\nEUR\n-1 429 479,12\n0,0\n-1 429 479,12\nFR\nOther Direct Aid - Ewe and Goats\n2010\nnon-compliant holding register, lack of verification of accuracy of entries to the register, update of the register later than on-the-spot check, non-compliance of the computer database\nFLAT RATE\n2,0 %\nEUR\n-109,82\n0,0\n-109,82\nTOTAL FR\nEUR\n-5 954 457,74\n-1 381 171,38\n-4 573 286,36\nGB\nDecoupled Direct Aids\n2008\nweaknesses in LPIS-GIS, in processing of applications, in administrative cross checks, in on-the-spot controls\nFLAT RATE\n2,0 %\nEUR\n-27 569 252,08\n-11 938 317,64\n-15 630 934,44\nGB\nOther Direct Aid - Energy Crops\n2008\nweaknesses in LPIS-GIS, in processing of applications, in administrative cross checks, in on-the-spot controls\nFLAT RATE\n2,0 %\nEUR\n-99 998,3\n0,0\n-99 998,3\nGB\nOther Direct Aids\n2008\nweaknesses in LPIS-GIS, in processing of applications, in administrative cross checks, in on-the-spot controls\nFLAT RATE\n2,0 %\nEUR\n-88 938,9\n0,0\n-88 938,9\nGB\nOther Direct Aids\n2009\nweaknesses in LPIS-GIS, in processing of applications, in administrative cross checks, in on-the-spot controls\nFLAT RATE\n2,0 %\nEUR\n-107 725,59\n0,0\n-107 725,59\nGB\nDecoupled Direct Aids\n2009\nweaknesses in LPIS-GIS, in processing of applications, in administrative cross checks, in on-the-spot controls\nFLAT RATE\n2,0 %\nEUR\n-41 109 525,75\n0,0\n-41 109 525,75\nGB\nOther Direct Aid - Energy Crops\n2009\nweaknesses in LPIS-GIS, in processing of applications, in administrative cross checks, in on-the-spot controls\nFLAT RATE\n2,0 %\nEUR\n-31 594,4\n0,0\n-31 594,4\nGB\nDecoupled Direct Aids\n2010\nweaknesses in LPIS-GIS, in processing of applications, in administrative cross checks, in on-the-spot controls\nFLAT RATE\n2,0 %\nEUR\n-41 490 749,02\n0,0\n-41 490 749,02\nGB\nOther Direct Aids\n2010\nweaknesses in LPIS-GIS, in processing of applications, in administrative cross checks, in on-the-spot controls\nFLAT RATE\n2,0 %\nEUR\n-174 763,24\n0,0\n-174 763,24\nGB\nOther Direct Aid - Energy Crops\n2010\nweaknesses in LPIS-GIS, in processing of applications, in administrative cross checks, in on-the-spot controls\nFLAT RATE\n2,0 %\nEUR\n-63 023,44\n0,0\n-63 023,44\nGB\nDecoupled Direct Aids\n2010\nWeaknesses in LPIS-GIS, in the on-the-spot checks and payments and sanctions\nEXTRAPOLATED\n5,19 %\nEUR\n-16 513 582,57\n-1 954 694,52\n-14 558 888,05\nGB\nIrregularities\n2011\nDeficiencies in the recovery of a debt case\nONE-OFF\nGBP\n-1 452 109,17\n0,0\n-1 452 109,17\nGB\nCross Compliance\n2007\nLenient sanctioning system, claim year 2006\nFLAT RATE\n5,0 %\nEUR\n-73 257,36\n0,0\n-73 257,36\nGB\nCross Compliance\n2008\nLenient sanctioning system, claim year 2006\nFLAT RATE\n5,0 %\nEUR\n-4 064,43\n0,0\n-4 064,43\nGB\nCross Compliance\n2008\nLenient sanctioning system, claim year 2007\nFLAT RATE\n5,0 %\nEUR\n-1 643 405,41\n-700,4\n-1 642 705,01\nGB\nCross Compliance\n2009\nMinimum requirements on fertilisers and plant protection and one SMR not adequately controlled, claim year 2008\nFLAT RATE\n2,0 %\nEUR\n-642 321,16\n0,0\n-642 321,16\nGB\nCross Compliance\n2009\nLenient sanctioning system, claim year 2006\nFLAT RATE\n5,0 %\nEUR\n-521,54\n0,0\n-521,54\nGB\nCross Compliance\n2009\nLenient sanctioning system, claim year 2007\nFLAT RATE\n5,0 %\nEUR\n-5 359,1\n0,0\n-5 359,1\nGB\nCross Compliance\n2010\nMinimum requirements on fertilisers and plant protection and one SMR not adequately controlled, claim year 2008\nFLAT RATE\n2,0 %\nEUR\n-712,31\n0,0\n-712,31\nGB\nCross Compliance\n2010\nLenient sanctioning system, claim year 2007\nFLAT RATE\n5,0 %\nEUR\n-536,91\n0,0\n-536,91\nTOTAL GB\nGBP\n-1 452 109,17\n0,0\n-1 452 109,17\nTOTAL GB\nEUR\n-129 619 331,51\n-13 893 712,56\n-115 725 618,95\nGR\nFinancial audit - Overshooting\n2010\nExceeding of ceilings\nONE-OFF\nEUR\n-4 048 593,82\n0,0\n-4 048 593,82\nGR\nFinancial audit - Late payments and payment deadlines\n2010\nlate payments\nONE-OFF\nEUR\n-11 217,98\n-11 217,98\n0,0\nGR\nFinancial audit - Late payments and payment deadlines\n2010\nlate payments\nONE-OFF\nEUR\n-1 148 947,18\n-375 753,63\n-773 193,55\nGR\nFood Aid within the Community\n2006\nOverpaid public storage costs\nONE-OFF\nEUR\n-58 833,0\n0,0\n-58 833,0\nGR\nPublic Storage - Rice\n2006\nOverpaid public storage costs\nONE-OFF\nEUR\n-369 174,82\n0,0\n-369 174,82\nGR\nOther Direct Aid - Article 69 of Reg.1782/2003 - only Ovines and Bovines\n2007\ncontrol free period, weaknesses in determination of the eligibility criteria, in the risk analysis and in the on-the-spot cpntrols, lack of quality supervision for the delegated controls\nFLAT RATE\n5,0 %\nEUR\n-1 016 633,47\n0,0\n-1 016 633,47\nGR\nOther Direct Aid - Article 69 of Reg.1782/2003 - only Ovines and Bovines\n2007\nchange of the eligibility criteria after the end of the claim year 2006\nONE-OFF\nEUR\n-1 246 345,92\n0,0\n-1 246 345,92\nGR\nOther Direct Aid - Article 69 of Reg.1782/2003 - except Ovines and Bovines\n2007\ncontrol free period, weaknesses in determination of the eligibility criteria, in the risk analysis and in the on-the-spot cpntrols, lack of quality supervision for the delegated controls\nFLAT RATE\n5,0 %\nEUR\n-358 518,51\n0,0\n-358 518,51\nGR\nOther Direct Aid - Article 69 of Reg.1782/2003 - only Ovines and Bovines\n2008\ncontrol free period, weaknesses in determination of the eligibility criteria, in the risk analysis and in the on-the-spot cpntrols, lack of quality supervision for the delegated controls\nFLAT RATE\n2,0 %\nEUR\n-125 128,34\n0,0\n-125 128,34\nGR\nOther Direct Aid - Article 69 of Reg.1782/2003 - only Ovines and Bovines\n2008\ncontrol free period, weaknesses in determination of the eligibility criteria, in the risk analysis and in the on-the-spot cpntrols, lack of quality supervision for the delegated controls\nFLAT RATE\n5,0 %\nEUR\n-567 077,51\n0,0\n-567 077,51\nGR\nOther Direct Aid - Article 69 of Reg.1782/2003 - except Ovines and Bovines\n2008\ncontrol free period, weaknesses in determination of the eligibility criteria, in the risk analysis and in the on-the-spot cpntrols, lack of quality supervision for the delegated controls\nFLAT RATE\n5,0 %\nEUR\n-339 319,37\n0,0\n-339 319,37\nGR\nOther Direct Aid - Article 69 of Reg.1782/2003 - except Ovines and Bovines\n2008\ncontrol free period, weaknesses in determination of the eligibility criteria, in the risk analysis and in the on-the-spot cpntrols, lack of quality supervision for the delegated controls\nFLAT RATE\n5,0 %\nEUR\n12,58\n0,0\n12,58\nGR\nOther Direct Aid - Article 69 of Reg.1782/2003 - only Ovines and Bovines\n2009\ncontrol free period, weaknesses in determination of the eligibility criteria, in the risk analysis and in the on-the-spot cpntrols, lack of quality supervision for the delegated controls\nFLAT RATE\n2,0 %\nEUR\n-23 367,16\n0,0\n-23 367,16\nGR\nOther Direct Aid - Article 69 of Reg.1782/2003 - except Ovines and Bovines\n2009\ncontrol free period, weaknesses in determination of the eligibility criteria, in the risk analysis and in the on-the-spot cpntrols, lack of quality supervision for the delegated controls\nFLAT RATE\n5,0 %\nEUR\n-10 743,31\n0,0\n-10 743,31\nGR\nOther Direct Aid - Article 69 of Reg.1782/2003 - only Ovines and Bovines\n2009\ncontrol free period, weaknesses in determination of the eligibility criteria, in the risk analysis and in the on-the-spot cpntrols, lack of quality supervision for the delegated controls\nFLAT RATE\n5,0 %\nEUR\n1 998,07\n0,0\n1 998,07\nGR\nOther Direct Aid - Article 69 of Reg.1782/2003 - except Ovines and Bovines\n2009\ncontrol free period, weaknesses in determination of the eligibility criteria, in the risk analysis and in the on-the-spot cpntrols, lack of quality supervision for the delegated controls\nFLAT RATE\n5,0 %\nEUR\n-1 066,26\n0,0\n-1 066,26\nTOTAL GR\nEUR\n-9 322 956,0\n-386 971,61\n-8 935 984,39\nHU\nCross Compliance\n2006\n8 GAEC not defined, claim year 2005\nFLAT RATE\n10,0 %\nHUF\n-281 162 836,1\n-5 622 679,91\n-275 540 156,19\nHU\nCross Compliance\n2007\n8 GAEC not defined, claim year 2005\nFLAT RATE\n10,0 %\nEUR\n-1 456,02\n-1 403,78\n-52,24\nHU\nCross Compliance\n2007\n8 GAEC not defined, claim year 2006\nFLAT RATE\n10,0 %\nEUR\n-2 836 628,7\n-21 435,09\n-2 815 193,61\nHU\nCross Compliance\n2008\n8 GAEC not defined, claim year 2005\nFLAT RATE\n10,0 %\nEUR\n23,59\n0,0\n23,59\nHU\nCross Compliance\n2008\n8 GAEC not defined, claim year 2006\nFLAT RATE\n10,0 %\nEUR\n387,67\n-32,6\n420,27\nHU\nCross Compliance\n2008\n8 GAEC not defined, claim year 2007\nFLAT RATE\n10,0 %\nEUR\n-5 428 019,24\n-28 383,73\n-5 399 635,51\nHU\nCross Compliance\n2009\n8 GAEC not defined, claim year 2005\nFLAT RATE\n10,0 %\nEUR\n-101,51\n0,0\n-101,51\nHU\nCross Compliance\n2009\n8 GAEC not defined, claim year 2006\nFLAT RATE\n10,0 %\nEUR\n-416,76\n0,0\n-416,76\nHU\nCross Compliance\n2009\n8 GAEC not defined, claim year 2007\nFLAT RATE\n10,0 %\nEUR\n-8 066,23\n0,0\n-8 066,23\nTOTAL HU\nHUF\n-281 162 836,1\n-5 622 679,91\n-275 540 156,19\nTOTAL HU\nEUR\n-8 274 277,2\n-51 255,2\n-8 223 022,0\nIE\nFinancial audit - Late payments and payment deadlines\n2011\nlate payments\nONE-OFF\nEUR\n-13 215,75\n-13 215,75\n0,0\nIE\nIrregularities\n2007\nNon-reporting of interest in the Annex III table of financial year 2006\nONE-OFF\nEUR\n-3 606,2\n0,0\n-3 606,2\nIE\nIrregularities\n2008\nNon-reporting of interest in the Annex III table of financial year 2007\nONE-OFF\nEUR\n-1 048,99\n0,0\n-1 048,99\nIE\nIrregularities\n2009\nNon-reporting of interest in the Annex III table of financial year 2008\nONE-OFF\nEUR\n-2 109,23\n0,0\n-2 109,23\nIE\nIrregularities\n2010\nNon-reporting of interest in the Annex III table of financial year 2009\nONE-OFF\nEUR\n-892,44\n0,0\n-892,44\nIE\nIrregularities\n2011\nNegligence in recovering the debt\nONE-OFF\nEUR\n-22 624,22\n0,0\n-22 624,22\nTOTAL IE\nEUR\n-43 496,83\n-13 215,75\n-30 281,08\nIT\nCross Compliance\n2006\nSeveral SMRs badly controlled, wrong application of correction, for farmers without animals - claim year 2005\nFLAT RATE\n5,0 %\nEUR\n-2 140 320,86\n-521,76\n-2 139 799,1\nIT\nCross Compliance\n2006\nSeveral SMRs badly controlled, wrong application of correction, for farmers without animals - claim year 2005\nFLAT RATE\n5,0 %\nEUR\n-17,57\n0,0\n-17,57\nIT\nCross Compliance\n2006\nSeveral SMRs badly controlled, wrong application of correction, for farmers with animals - claim year 2005\nFLAT RATE\n10,0 %\nEUR\n-3 799 568,8\n-877,18\n-3 798 691,62\nIT\nCross Compliance\n2006\nSeveral SMRs badly controlled, wrong application of correction, for farmers with animals - claim year 2005\nFLAT RATE\n10,0 %\nEUR\n-588,4\n0,0\n-588,4\nIT\nCross Compliance\n2007\nSeveral SMRs badly controlled, wrong application of correction, for farmers without animals - claim year 2006\nFLAT RATE\n5,0 %\nEUR\n-7 065 635,65\n-60 023,03\n-7 005 612,62\nIT\nCross Compliance\n2007\nSeveral SMRs badly controlled, wrong application of correction, for farmers without animals - claim year 2006\nFLAT RATE\n5,0 %\nEUR\n-5 975,35\n0,0\n-5 975,35\nIT\nCross Compliance\n2007\nSeveral SMRs badly controlled, wrong application of correction, for farmers with animals - claim year 2006\nFLAT RATE\n10,0 %\nEUR\n-8 809 763,62\n-53 375,69\n-8 756 387,93\nIT\nCross Compliance\n2007\nSeveral SMRs badly controlled, wrong application of correction, for farmers with animals - claim year 2006\nFLAT RATE\n10,0 %\nEUR\n-19 257,41\n0,0\n-19 257,41\nIT\nCross Compliance\n2008\nSeveral SMRs badly controlled, wrong application of correction, for farmers without animals - claim year 2007\nFLAT RATE\n5,0 %\nEUR\n-11 214 946,03\n-43 992,23\n-11 170 953,8\nIT\nCross Compliance\n2008\nSeveral SMRs badly controlled, wrong application of correction, for farmers without animals - claim year 2007\nFLAT RATE\n5,0 %\nEUR\n-698 146,26\n0,0\n-698 146,26\nIT\nCross Compliance\n2008\nSeveral SMRs badly controlled, wrong application of correction, for farmers with animals - claim year 2007\nFLAT RATE\n10,0 %\nEUR\n-14 331 663,3\n-48 186,16\n-14 283 477,14\nIT\nCross Compliance\n2008\nSeveral SMRs badly controlled, wrong application of correction, for farmers with animals - claim year 2007\nFLAT RATE\n10,0 %\nEUR\n-216 402,75\n-74,09\n-216 328,66\nIT\nFinancial audit - Late payments and payment deadlines\n2011\nlate payments\nONE-OFF\nEUR\n-2 458 104,43\n-2 458 104,43\n0,0\nIT\nMilk - Quota\n2011\nrecovery of milk levy\nONE-OFF\nEUR\n163 991,21\n163 991,21\n0,0\nIT\nAccreditation Paying Agency\n2007\ndeficiencies in the accreditation criteria for EAGF\nFLAT RATE\n16,0 %\nEUR\n-3 248,92\n0,0\n-3 248,92\nIT\nAccreditation Paying Agency\n2007\ndeficiencies in the accreditation criteria for EAGF (debtors)\nFLAT RATE\n16,0 %\nEUR\n-64 771,05\n0,0\n-64 771,05\nIT\nAccreditation Paying Agency\n2008\ndeficiencies in the accreditation criteria for EAGF\nFLAT RATE\n16,0 %\nEUR\n-2 527,19\n0,0\n-2 527,19\nIT\nAccreditation Paying Agency\n2008\ndeficiencies in the accreditation criteria for EAGF (debtors)\nFLAT RATE\n16,0 %\nEUR\n-119 653,3\n0,0\n-119 653,3\nIT\nAccreditation Paying Agency\n2009\ndeficiencies in the accreditation criteria for EAGF\nFLAT RATE\n16,0 %\nEUR\n-445 807,98\n0,0\n-445 807,98\nIT\nAccreditation Paying Agency\n2009\ndeficiencies in the accreditation criteria for EAGF (debtors)\nFLAT RATE\n16,0 %\nEUR\n-118 662,34\n0,0\n-118 662,34\nIT\nFruit and Vegetables - Citrus Processing\n2005\nGravely deficient control system, fraud\nFLAT RATE\n25,0 %\nEUR\n-17 098 044,58\n0,0\n-17 098 044,58\nIT\nFruit and Vegetables - Citrus Processing\n2006\nGravely deficient control system, fraud\nFLAT RATE\n25,0 %\nEUR\n-817 132,98\n0,0\n-817 132,98\nIT\nFruit and Vegetables - Citrus Processing\n2007\nGravely deficient control system, fraud\nFLAT RATE\n25,0 %\nEUR\n1 201,24\n0,0\n1 201,24\nIT\nRural Development EAGGF (2000-2006)* - Area related measures\n2006\nno cross-checks with the animal database; delayed on-the-spot checks\nFLAT RATE\n2,0 %\nEUR\n-318 652,0\n0,0\n-318 652,0\nIT\nRural Development EAGGF (2000-2006)* - Area related measures\n2006\ndelayed on-the-spot checks; insufficient checks of the use of fertilisers\nFLAT RATE\n5,0 %\nEUR\n-50 391,0\n0,0\n-50 391,0\nIT\nRural Development EAGGF (2000-2006)* - Area related measures\n2006\nno cross-checks with the animal database; delayed on-the-spot checks\nFLAT RATE\n5,0 %\nEUR\n-625 923,0\n0,0\n-625 923,0\nIT\nRural Development EAGGF (2000-2006)* - Area related measures\n2007\nno cross-checks with the animal database; delayed on-the-spot checks\nFLAT RATE\n5,0 %\nEUR\n4 073,0\n0,0\n4 073,0\nTOTAL IT\nEUR\n-70 255 939,32\n-2 501 163,36\n-67 754 775,96\nLT\nCross Compliance\n2007\nOne GAEC missing, One GAEC badly controlled, Poor definition of severity, claim year 2006\nFLAT RATE\n5,0 %\nEUR\n26,7\n0,0\n26,7\nLT\nCross Compliance\n2007\nThree GAEC missing, Poor definition of severity, claim year 2006\nFLAT RATE\n5,0 %\nEUR\n-28 566,8\n-545,96\n-28 020,84\nLT\nCross Compliance\n2008\nOne GAEC missing, One GAEC badly controlled, Poor definition of severity, claim year 2007\nFLAT RATE\n2,0 %\nEUR\n-154 416,57\n0,0\n-154 416,57\nLT\nCross Compliance\n2008\nGAEC not defined (1st pillar only), claim year 2007\nFLAT RATE\n5,0 %\nEUR\n-404 835,64\n0,0\n-404 835,64\nLT\nCross Compliance\n2008\nOne GAEC missing, One GAEC badly controlled, Poor definition of severity, claim year 2006\nFLAT RATE\n5,0 %\nEUR\n0,83\n0,0\n0,83\nLT\nCross Compliance\n2008\nOne GAEC missing, One GAEC badly controlled, Poor definition of severity, claim year 2007\nFLAT RATE\n5,0 %\nEUR\n1 014,7\n0,0\n1 014,7\nLT\nCross Compliance\n2008\nThree GAEC missing, Poor definition of severity, claim year 2006\nFLAT RATE\n5,0 %\nEUR\n-216,86\n-3,4\n-213,46\nLT\nCross Compliance\n2009\nOne GAEC missing, One GAEC badly controlled, Poor definition of severity, claim year 2007\nFLAT RATE\n2,0 %\nEUR\n-200,95\n0,0\n-200,95\nLT\nCross Compliance\n2009\nOne GAEC missing, One GAEC badly controlled, Poor definition of severity, claim year 2008\nFLAT RATE\n2,0 %\nEUR\n-204 161,54\n0,0\n-204 161,54\nLT\nCross Compliance\n2009\nGAEC not defined (1st pillar only), claim year 2008\nFLAT RATE\n5,0 %\nEUR\n-468 159,5\n0,0\n-468 159,5\nLT\nCross Compliance\n2009\nOne GAEC missing, One GAEC badly controlled, Poor definition of severity, claim year 2006\nFLAT RATE\n5,0 %\nEUR\n-0,01\n0,0\n-0,01\nLT\nCross Compliance\n2009\nOne GAEC missing, One GAEC badly controlled, Poor definition of severity, claim year 2007\nFLAT RATE\n5,0 %\nEUR\n164,08\n0,0\n164,08\nLT\nCross Compliance\n2009\nOne GAEC missing, One GAEC badly controlled, Poor definition of severity, claim year 2008\nFLAT RATE\n5,0 %\nEUR\n37,58\n0,0\n37,58\nLT\nCross Compliance\n2009\nThree GAEC missing, Poor definition of severity, claim year 2006\nFLAT RATE\n5,0 %\nEUR\n-13,95\n0,0\n-13,95\nLT\nCross Compliance\n2010\nOne GAEC missing, One GAEC badly controlled, Poor definition of severity, claim year 2007\nFLAT RATE\n2,0 %\nEUR\n-24,21\n0,0\n-24,21\nLT\nCross Compliance\n2010\nOne GAEC missing, One GAEC badly controlled, Poor definition of severity, claim year 2008\nFLAT RATE\n2,0 %\nEUR\n-188,77\n0,0\n-188,77\nLT\nCross Compliance\n2010\nOne GAEC missing, One GAEC badly controlled, Poor definition of severity, claim year 2006\nFLAT RATE\n5,0 %\nEUR\n5,41\n0,0\n5,41\nLT\nCross Compliance\n2010\nOne GAEC missing, One GAEC badly controlled, Poor definition of severity, claim year 2007\nFLAT RATE\n5,0 %\nEUR\n29,86\n0,0\n29,86\nLT\nCross Compliance\n2010\nOne GAEC missing, One GAEC badly controlled, Poor definition of severity, claim year 2008\nFLAT RATE\n5,0 %\nEUR\n29,88\n0,0\n29,88\nTOTAL LT\nEUR\n-1 259 475,76\n-549,36\n-1 258 926,4\nMT\nCross Compliance\n2008\nLenient sanctioning system, claim year 2007\nFLAT RATE\n5,0 %\nEUR\n-7 853,65\n0,0\n-7 853,65\nMT\nCross Compliance\n2009\nLenient sanctioning system, claim year 2007\nFLAT RATE\n5,0 %\nEUR\n-20,61\n0,0\n-20,61\nMT\nCross Compliance\n2009\nLenient sanctioning system, claim year 2008\nFLAT RATE\n5,0 %\nEUR\n-13 568,05\n0,0\n-13 568,05\nMT\nCross Compliance\n2010\nLenient sanctioning system, claim year 2007\nFLAT RATE\n5,0 %\nEUR\n-2,9\n0,0\n-2,9\nMT\nCross Compliance\n2010\nLenient sanctioning system, claim year 2008\nFLAT RATE\n5,0 %\nEUR\n-88,08\n0,0\n-88,08\nMT\nCross Compliance\n2010\nLenient sanctioning system, claim year 2009\nFLAT RATE\n5,0 %\nEUR\n-16 838,2\n0,0\n-16 838,2\nMT\nCross Compliance\n2010\nLenient sanctioning system, claim year 2009\nFLAT RATE\n5,0 %\nEUR\n142,32\n0,0\n142,32\nMT\nCross Compliance\n2011\nLenient sanctioning system, claim year 2008\nFLAT RATE\n5,0 %\nEUR\n-26,86\n0,0\n-26,86\nMT\nCross Compliance\n2011\nLenient sanctioning system, claim year 2009\nFLAT RATE\n5,0 %\nEUR\n-26,01\n0,0\n-26,01\nTOTAL MT\nEUR\n-38 282,04\n0,0\n-38 282,04\nNL\nClearance of accounts - Financial Clearance\n2010\nknown error related to the use of bumble bees for pollination\nONE-OFF\nEUR\n-688 510,0\n0,0\n-688 510,0\nTOTAL NL\nEUR\n-688 510,0\n0,0\n-688 510,0\nPL\nFruit and Vegetables - Tomato Processing\n2007\nweaknesses in the controls checks\nFLAT RATE\n5,0 %\nPLN\n-1 166 100,45\n-8 151,74\n-1 157 948,71\nPL\nFruit and Vegetables - Tomato Processing\n2007\nlate payments\nONE-OFF\nPLN\n-163 034,87\n0,0\n-163 034,87\nPL\nFruit and Vegetables - Tomato Processing\n2008\nweaknesses in the controls checks\nFLAT RATE\n5,0 %\nEUR\n-340 453,82\n0,0\n-340 453,82\nTOTAL PL\nPLN\n-1 329 135,32\n-8 151,74\n-1 320 983,58\nTOTAL PL\nEUR\n-340 453,82\n0,0\n-340 453,82\nRO\nFinancial audit - Late payments and payment deadlines\n2011\nlate payments\nONE-OFF\nEUR\n-82 812,73\n-82 812,73\n0,0\nTOTAL RO\nEUR\n-82 812,73\n-82 812,73\n0,0\nSE\nFinancial audit - Overshooting\n2011\nexceeding of ceiling\nONE-OFF\nEUR\n-3 013,42\n-3 013,42\n0,0\nTOTAL SE\nEUR\n-3 013,42\n-3 013,42\n0,0\nSI\nOther Direct Aid - Ewe and Goats\n2007\nFailure to achieve the minimum rate of on-the-spot checks for ovine throughout the retention period and higher level of reductions and exclusions established during on-the-spot checks in the random sample than in the risk analysis sample\nFLAT RATE\n5,0 %\nEUR\n-37 036,67\n0,0\n-37 036,67\nSI\nOther Direct Aid - Article 69 of Reg.1782/2003 - only Ovines and Bovines\n2008\nNon application of eligibility sanctions in case of late tagging of calves\nONE-OFF\nEUR\n-61 130,59\n0,0\n-61 130,59\nSI\nEntitlements\n2008\nCalculation of set-aside entitlements, parcels of land artificially designed in order to fulfil the minimum size requirements, recovery of unduly allocated entitlements and payments, use of national reserve for agricultural land covered by forest, individual cases\nONE-OFF\nEUR\n-25 453,98\n0,0\n-25 453,98\nSI\nEntitlements\n2009\nCalculation of set-aside entitlements, parcels of land artificially designed in order to fulfil the minimum size requirements, recovery of unduly allocated entitlements and payments, use of national reserve for agricultural land covered by forest, individual cases\nONE-OFF\nEUR\n-13 990,92\n0,0\n-13 990,92\nSI\nEntitlements\n2010\nCalculation of set-aside entitlements, parcels of land artificially designed in order to fulfil the minimum size requirements, recovery of unduly allocated entitlements and payments, use of national reserve for agricultural land covered by forest, individual cases\nONE-OFF\nEUR\n-148 484,5\n0,0\n-148 484,5\nTOTAL SI\nEUR\n-286 096,66\n0,0\n-286 096,66\nSK\nFinancial audit - Late payments and payment deadlines\n2011\nlate payments\nONE-OFF\nEUR\n-346 334,22\n-346 334,22\n0,0\nSK\nCross Compliance\n2007\nGAEC not defined, weaknesses in on the spot controls, claim year 2006\nFLAT RATE\n5,0 %\nEUR\n-398 260,86\n0,0\n-398 260,86\nSK\nCross Compliance\n2008\nGAEC not defined, weaknesses in on the spot controls, claim year 2006\nFLAT RATE\n5,0 %\nEUR\n-23,84\n0,0\n-23,84\nSK\nCross Compliance\n2008\nGAEC not defined, weaknesses in on the spot controls, claim year 2007\nFLAT RATE\n5,0 %\nEUR\n-779 668,89\n0,0\n-779 668,89\nSK\nCross Compliance\n2009\nGAEC not defined, weaknesses in on the spot controls, claim year 2006\nFLAT RATE\n5,0 %\nEUR\n-8,91\n0,0\n-8,91\nSK\nCross Compliance\n2009\nGAEC not defined, weaknesses in on the spot controls, claim year 2007\nFLAT RATE\n5,0 %\nEUR\n-796,0\n0,0\n-796,0\nTOTAL SK\nEUR\n-1 525 092,72\n-346 334,22\n-1 178 758,5\n6701 TOTAL\nDKK\n-142 645,0\n0,0\n-142 645,0\n6701 TOTAL\nGBP\n-1 452 109,17\n0,0\n-1 452 109,17\n6701 TOTAL\nHUF\n-281 162 836,1\n-5 622 679,91\n-275 540 156,19\n6701 TOTAL\nPLN\n-1 329 135,32\n-8 151,74\n-1 320 983,58\n6701 TOTAL\nEUR\n-296 785 796,48\n-18 661 087,63\n-278 124 708,85\nBUDGET ITEM: 6711\nBE\nCross Compliance\n2008\nGAEC not implemented, partial on the spot controls, claim year 2007\nFLAT RATE\n5,0 %\nEUR\n-31 470,12\n0,0\n-31 470,12\nBE\nCross Compliance\n2009\nGAEC not implemented, partial on the spot controls, claim year 2007\nFLAT RATE\n5,0 %\nEUR\n-1 440,26\n0,0\n-1 440,26\nBE\nCross Compliance\n2010\nGAEC not implemented, partial on the spot controls, claim year 2007\nFLAT RATE\n5,0 %\nEUR\n-352,15\n0,0\n-352,15\nTOTAL BE\nEUR\n-33 262,53\n0,0\n-33 262,53\nBG\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area related measures)\n2009\ndeficiencies in timinig of the on-the-spot checks and sample selection\nFLAT RATE\n2,0 %\nEUR\n-40 146,27\n0,0\n-40 146,27\nBG\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area related measures)\n2010\ndeficiencies in timinig of the on-the-spot checks and sample selection\nFLAT RATE\n2,0 %\nEUR\n17 174,46\n0,0\n17 174,46\nTOTAL BG\nEUR\n-22 971,81\n0,0\n-22 971,81\nCY\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area related measures)\n2010\nLate administrative checks and inappropriate timing of on-the-spot checks\nFLAT RATE\n2,0 %\nEUR\n-2 062,12\n0,0\n-2 062,12\nCY\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area related measures)\n2011\nLate administrative checks and inappropriate timing of on-the-spot checks\nFLAT RATE\n2,0 %\nEUR\n-97 678,93\n0,0\n-97 678,93\nTOTAL CY\nEUR\n-99 741,05\n0,0\n-99 741,05\nCZ\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area related measures)\n2008\nLack of on-the-spot checks on livestock density\nFLAT RATE\n2,0 %\nEUR\n-2 153 061,12\n-10 764,12\n-2 142 297,0\nCZ\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area related measures)\n2009\nLack of on-the-spot checks on livestock density\nFLAT RATE\n2,0 %\nEUR\n-2 321 491,75\n-11 607,46\n-2 309 884,29\nCZ\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area related measures)\n2010\nLack of on-the-spot checks on livestock density\nFLAT RATE\n2,0 %\nEUR\n-2 418,58\n0,0\n-2 418,58\nCZ\nCross Compliance\n2008\nGAEC non defined, Weaknesses in evaluation of non compliances, claim year 2007\nFLAT RATE\n5,0 %\nEUR\n-621 456,24\n0,0\n-621 456,24\nCZ\nCross Compliance\n2008\nGAEC non defined, Weaknesses in evaluation of non compliances, claim year 2008\nFLAT RATE\n5,0 %\nEUR\n-9,15\n0,0\n-9,15\nCZ\nCross Compliance\n2009\nGAEC non defined, Weaknesses in evaluation of non compliances, claim year 2007\nFLAT RATE\n5,0 %\nEUR\n-10 682,73\n0,0\n-10 682,73\nCZ\nCross Compliance\n2009\nGAEC non defined, Weaknesses in evaluation of non compliances, claim year 2008\nFLAT RATE\n5,0 %\nEUR\n-669 467,88\n0,0\n-669 467,88\nTOTAL CZ\nEUR\n-5 778 587,45\n-22 371,58\n-5 756 215,87\nDE\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 1+3 - Investment orientated measures (2007-2013)\n2007\nweaknesses in selection among eligible applications\nFLAT RATE\n10,0 %\nEUR\n-130 781,57\n0,0\n-130 781,57\nDE\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 1+3 - Investment orientated measures (2007-2013)\n2007\nPayments including ineligible VAT\nONE-OFF\nEUR\n-2 698 127,96\n0,0\n-2 698 127,96\nDE\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 1+3 - Investment orientated measures (2007-2013)\n2008\nweaknesses in selection among eligible applications\nFLAT RATE\n10,0 %\nEUR\n-105 424,95\n0,0\n-105 424,95\nDE\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 1+3 - Investment orientated measures (2007-2013)\n2009\nweaknesses in selection among eligible applications\nFLAT RATE\n10,0 %\nEUR\n-804 414,05\n0,0\n-804 414,05\nTOTAL DE\nEUR\n-3 738 748,53\n0,0\n-3 738 748,53\nES\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area related measures)\n2009\nWeaknesses on the on-the-spot controls, lack of traceability (claim year 2009 paid in financial year 2009)\nFLAT RATE\n2,0 %\nEUR\n-90 572,51\n0,0\n-90 572,51\nES\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area related measures)\n2010\nWeaknesses on the on-the-spot controls, lack of traceability (claim year 2009 paid in financial year 2010)\nFLAT RATE\n2,0 %\nEUR\n-126 456,16\n0,0\n-126 456,16\nES\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area related measures)\n2010\nWeaknesses on the on-the-spot controls, lack of traceability (claim year 2010 paid in financial year 2010)\nFLAT RATE\n2,0 %\nEUR\n-125 866,86\n0,0\n-125 866,86\nES\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area related measures)\n2011\nWeaknesses on the on-the-spot controls, lack of traceability (claim year 2009 paid in financial year 2011)\nFLAT RATE\n2,0 %\nEUR\n536,22\n0,0\n536,22\nES\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area related measures)\n2011\nWeaknesses on the on-the-spot controls, lack of traceability (claim year 2010 paid in financial year 2011)\nFLAT RATE\n2,0 %\nEUR\n-36 730,38\n0,0\n-36 730,38\nTOTAL ES\nEUR\n-379 089,69\n0,0\n-379 089,69\nFI\nClearance of accounts - Financial Clearance\n2009\nerrors detected during the certification exercise for financial year 2009 in EAFRD population\nONE-OFF\nEUR\n-1 766,4\n0,0\n-1 766,4\nTOTAL FI\nEUR\n-1 766,4\n0,0\n-1 766,4\nFR\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 1 (2007-2013)\n2007\nNon-exhaustive administrative control of the preferential loans invoices and late audits in banks\nFLAT RATE\n5,0 %\nEUR\n-2 678 837,27\n0,0\n-2 678 837,27\nFR\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 1 - Measures with flat rate support (2007-2013)\n2008\nNon-exhaustive administrative control of the preferential loans invoices and late audits in banks\nFLAT RATE\n5,0 %\nEUR\n-1 015 793,65\n0,0\n-1 015 793,65\nFR\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 1+3 - Investment orientated measures (2007-2013)\n2008\nNon-exhaustive administrative control of the preferential loans invoices and late audits in banks\nFLAT RATE\n5,0 %\nEUR\n-1 386 514,48\n0,0\n-1 386 514,48\nFR\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 1+3 - Investment orientated measures (2007-2013)\n2009\nNon-exhaustive administrative control of the preferential loans invoices and late audits in banks\nFLAT RATE\n5,0 %\nEUR\n-125 462,91\n0,0\n-125 462,91\nFR\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 1 - Measures with flat rate support (2007-2013)\n2009\nNon-exhaustive administrative control of the preferential loans invoices and late audits in banks\nFLAT RATE\n5,0 %\nEUR\n-1 246 558,73\n0,0\n-1 246 558,73\nFR\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area related measures)\n2008\ndeficiencies in the on the spot controls\nFLAT RATE\n5,0 %\nEUR\n-21 056 869,75\n0,0\n-21 056 869,75\nFR\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area related measures)\n2009\ndeficiencies in the on the spot controls\nFLAT RATE\n5,0 %\nEUR\n-7 898 813,6\n0,0\n-7 898 813,6\nTOTAL FR\nEUR\n-35 408 850,39\n0,0\n-35 408 850,39\nGB\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area related measures)\n2008\nweaknesses in LPIS-GIS, in processing of applications, in administrative cross checks, on-the-spot controls\nFLAT RATE\n2,0 %\nEUR\n-355 672,24\n-16 180,58\n-339 491,66\nGB\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area related measures)\n2009\nweaknesses in LPIS-GIS, in processing of applications, in administrative cross checks, on-the-spot controls\nFLAT RATE\n2,0 %\nEUR\n-288 122,53\n0,0\n-288 122,53\nGB\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area related measures)\n2010\nweaknesses in LPIS-GIS, in processing of applications, in administrative cross checks, on-the-spot controls\nFLAT RATE\n2,0 %\nEUR\n-298 761,99\n-293 852,81\n-4 909,18\nGB\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area related measures)\n2010\nWeaknesses in LPIS-GIS, on-the-spot checks and payments and sanctions\nFLAT RATE\n5,0 %\nEUR\n-1 173 720,59\n0,0\n-1 173 720,59\nGB\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area related measures)\n2008\ndeficiencies in the Agri-environment measures\nFLAT RATE\n2,0 %\nEUR\n-3 235 955,12\n-17 650,45\n-3 218 304,67\nGB\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area related measures)\n2009\ndeficiencies in the Agri-environment measures\nFLAT RATE\n2,0 %\nEUR\n-1 117 396,52\n-4 828,16\n-1 112 568,36\nGB\nCross Compliance\n2008\nMinimum requirements on fertilisers and plant protection and one SMR not adequately controlled, claim year 2008\nFLAT RATE\n2,0 %\nEUR\n-5 741,43\n0,0\n-5 741,43\nGB\nCross Compliance\n2008\nLenient sanctioning system, claim year 2007\nFLAT RATE\n5,0 %\nEUR\n-77 419,7\n0,0\n-77 419,7\nGB\nCross Compliance\n2009\nMinimum requirements on fertilisers and plant protection and one SMR not adequately controlled, claim year 2008\nFLAT RATE\n2,0 %\nEUR\n-22 884,24\n0,0\n-22 884,24\nGB\nCross Compliance\n2009\nLenient sanctioning system, claim year 2007\nFLAT RATE\n5,0 %\nEUR\n32,09\n0,0\n32,09\nGB\nCross Compliance\n2010\nMinimum requirements on fertilisers and plant protection and one SMR not adequately controlled, claim year 2008\nFLAT RATE\n2,0 %\nEUR\n-31,12\n0,0\n-31,12\nGB\nCross Compliance\n2010\nLenient sanctioning system, claim year 2007\nFLAT RATE\n5,0 %\nEUR\n-70,69\n0,0\n-70,69\nTOTAL GB\nEUR\n-6 575 744,08\n-332 512,0\n-6 243 232,08\nHU\nCross Compliance\n2008\n8 GAEC not defined, claim year 2007\nFLAT RATE\n10,0 %\nEUR\n-79 998,57\n0,0\n-79 998,57\nHU\nCross Compliance\n2009\n8 GAEC not defined, claim year 2007\nFLAT RATE\n10,0 %\nEUR\n-21 025,02\n0,0\n-21 025,02\nTOTAL HU\nEUR\n-101 023,59\n0,0\n-101 023,59\nIE\nClearance of accounts - Financial Clearance\n2010\nKnown Error\nONE-OFF\nEUR\n-197 620,52\n0,0\n-197 620,52\nIE\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 1 - Measures with flat rate support (2007-2013)\n2007\nweaknesses in the verification of declarations made by the agricultural advisors on certain eligibility criteria under the Early Retirement Scheme (measure 113)\nONE-OFF\nEUR\n-10 122,22\n0,0\n-10 122,22\nIE\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 1 - Measures with flat rate support (2007-2013)\n2008\nweaknesses in measurability of objectives in the business plan of the Young Farmers scheme (measure 112)\nFLAT RATE\n5,0 %\nEUR\n-115 125,0\n0,0\n-115 125,0\nIE\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 1 - Measures with flat rate support (2007-2013)\n2008\nweaknesses in the verification of declarations made by the agricultural advisors on certain eligibility criteria under the Early Retirement Scheme (measure 113)\nONE-OFF\nEUR\n-31 262,8\n0,0\n-31 262,8\nIE\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 1 - Measures with flat rate support (2007-2013)\n2009\nweaknesses in measurability of objectives in the business plan of the Young Farmers scheme (measure 112)\nFLAT RATE\n5,0 %\nEUR\n-134 055,0\n0,0\n-134 055,0\nIE\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 1 - Measures with flat rate support (2007-2013)\n2009\nweaknesses in the verification of declarations made by the agricultural advisors on certain eligibility criteria under the Early Retirement Scheme (measure 113)\nONE-OFF\nEUR\n-20 795,07\n0,0\n-20 795,07\nIE\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 1 - Measures with flat rate support (2007-2013)\n2010\nweaknesses in measurability of objectives in the business plan of the Young Farmers scheme (measure 112)\nFLAT RATE\n5,0 %\nEUR\n-55 436,25\n0,0\n-55 436,25\nIE\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 1 - Measures with flat rate support (2007-2013)\n2010\nweaknesses in the verification of declarations made by the agricultural advisors on certain eligibility criteria under the Early Retirement Scheme (measure 113)\nONE-OFF\nEUR\n-19 051,2\n0,0\n-19 051,2\nIE\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 1 - Measures with flat rate support (2007-2013)\n2011\nweaknesses in the verification of declarations made by the agricultural advisors on certain eligibility criteria under the Early Retirement Scheme (measure 113)\nONE-OFF\nEUR\n-11 113,21\n0,0\n-11 113,21\nTOTAL IE\nEUR\n-594 581,27\n0,0\n-594 581,27\nIT\nAccreditation Paying Agency\n2008\ndeficiencies in the accreditation criteria for EAFRD\nFLAT RATE\n16,0 %\nEUR\n-2 885 304,84\n0,0\n-2 885 304,84\nIT\nAccreditation Paying Agency\n2009\ndeficiencies in the accreditation criteria for EAFRD\nFLAT RATE\n16,0 %\nEUR\n-2 709 857,58\n0,0\n-2 709 857,58\nIT\nAccreditation Paying Agency\n2009\ndeficiencies in the accreditation criteria for EAFRD (debtors)\nFLAT RATE\n16,0 %\nEUR\n-4 279,19\n0,0\n-4 279,19\nIT\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area related measures)\n2008\ndelayed on-the-spot checks; insufficient checks of the use of fertilisers\nFLAT RATE\n5,0 %\nEUR\n-7 886,0\n0,0\n-7 886,0\nIT\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area related measures)\n2008\nno cross-checks with the animal database; delayed on-the-spot checks\nFLAT RATE\n5,0 %\nEUR\n-246 930,0\n0,0\n-246 930,0\nTOTAL IT\nEUR\n-5 854 257,61\n0,0\n-5 854 257,61\nLT\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 1 - Measures with flat rate support (2007-2013)\n2008\nWeak control system on eligibility of beneficiaries\nFLAT RATE\n5,0 %\nEUR\n-14 686,92\n0,0\n-14 686,92\nLT\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 1 - Measures with flat rate support (2007-2013)\n2009\nWeak control system on eligibility of beneficiaries\nFLAT RATE\n5,0 %\nEUR\n-848 148,4\n0,0\n-848 148,4\nLT\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 1 - Measures with flat rate support (2007-2013)\n2010\nWeak control system on eligibility of beneficiaries\nFLAT RATE\n5,0 %\nEUR\n-766 818,02\n0,0\n-766 818,02\nLT\nCross Compliance\n2008\nOne GAEC missing, one GAEC badly controlled, poor definition of severity, claim year 2007\nFLAT RATE\n2,0 %\nEUR\n-98 669,98\n0,0\n-98 669,98\nLT\nCross Compliance\n2009\nOne GAEC missing, one GAEC badly controlled, poor definition of severity, claim year 2007\nFLAT RATE\n2,0 %\nEUR\n-1 743,38\n0,0\n-1 743,38\nLT\nCross Compliance\n2009\nOne GAEC missing, one GAEC badly controlled, poor definition of severity, claim year 2008\nFLAT RATE\n2,0 %\nEUR\n-101 975,29\n0,0\n-101 975,29\nLT\nCross Compliance\n2010\nOne GAEC missing, one GAEC badly controlled, poor definition of severity, claim year 2007\nFLAT RATE\n2,0 %\nEUR\n392,93\n0,0\n392,93\nLT\nCross Compliance\n2010\nOne GAEC missing, one GAEC badly controlled, poor definition of severity, claim year 2008\nFLAT RATE\n2,0 %\nEUR\n-382,94\n0,0\n-382,94\nTOTAL LT\nEUR\n-1 832 032,0\n0,0\n-1 832 032,0\nMT\nCross Compliance\n2009\nLenient sanctioning system, claim year 2007\nFLAT RATE\n5,0 %\nEUR\n-6 858,55\n0,0\n-6 858,55\nMT\nCross Compliance\n2009\nLenient sanctioning system, claim year 2008\nFLAT RATE\n5,0 %\nEUR\n-8 803,69\n0,0\n-8 803,69\nMT\nCross Compliance\n2009\nLenient sanctioning system, claim year 2009\nFLAT RATE\n5,0 %\nEUR\n-33,58\n0,0\n-33,58\nMT\nCross Compliance\n2010\nLenient sanctioning system, claim year 2007\nFLAT RATE\n5,0 %\nEUR\n-232,55\n0,0\n-232,55\nMT\nCross Compliance\n2010\nLenient sanctioning system, claim year 2008\nFLAT RATE\n5,0 %\nEUR\n-2 078,01\n0,0\n-2 078,01\nMT\nCross Compliance\n2010\nLenient sanctioning system, claim year 2009\nFLAT RATE\n5,0 %\nEUR\n-12 545,31\n0,0\n-12 545,31\nMT\nCross Compliance\n2011\nLenient sanctioning system, claim year 2008\nFLAT RATE\n5,0 %\nEUR\n-239,5\n0,0\n-239,5\nMT\nCross Compliance\n2011\nLenient sanctioning system, claim year 2009\nFLAT RATE\n5,0 %\nEUR\n-53,44\n0,0\n-53,44\nTOTAL MT\nEUR\n-30 844,63\n0,0\n-30 844,63\nPL\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 1 - Measures with flat rate support (2007-2013)\n2008\nWeakness in management of the early retirement scheme\nFLAT RATE\n2,0 %\nEUR\n-253 108,8\n0,0\n-253 108,8\nPL\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 1 - Measures with flat rate support (2007-2013)\n2008\nWeakness in management of the early retirement scheme\nFLAT RATE\n5,0 %\nEUR\n-9 868 306,45\n0,0\n-9 868 306,45\nPL\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 1 - Measures with flat rate support (2007-2013)\n2009\nWeakness in management of the early retirement scheme\nFLAT RATE\n2,0 %\nEUR\n-627 971,3\n0,0\n-627 971,3\nPL\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 1 - Measures with flat rate support (2007-2013)\n2009\nWeakness in management of the early retirement scheme\nFLAT RATE\n5,0 %\nEUR\n-9 761 030,13\n0,0\n-9 761 030,13\nPL\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 1 - Measures with flat rate support (2007-2013)\n2010\nWeakness in management of the early retirement scheme\nFLAT RATE\n2,0 %\nEUR\n-498 848,26\n0,0\n-498 848,26\nPL\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 1 - Measures with flat rate support (2007-2013)\n2010\nWeakness in management of the early retirement scheme\nFLAT RATE\n5,0 %\nEUR\n-7 753 973,66\n0,0\n-7 753 973,66\nTOTAL PL\nEUR\n-28 763 238,6\n0,0\n-28 763 238,6\nRO\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 1+3 - Investment orientated measures (2007-2013)\n2009\nweaknesses in the controls of a risk of creation of artificial conditions, eligibility of the beneficiary, eligibility of expenses\nFLAT RATE\n5,0 %\nEUR\n-3 579 714,82\n0,0\n-3 579 714,82\nRO\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 1+3 - Investment orientated measures (2007-2013)\n2010\nweaknesses in the controls of a risk of creation of artificial conditions, eligibility of the beneficiary, eligibility of expenses\nFLAT RATE\n5,0 %\nEUR\n-8 921 103,16\n0,0\n-8 921 103,16\nRO\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area related measures)\n2009\nIncomplete checks on parcels and on logbooks\nFLAT RATE\n2,0 %\nEUR\n-2 239 090,38\n-2 239 090,38\n0,0\nRO\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area related measures)\n2010\nIncomplete checks on parcels and on logbooks\nFLAT RATE\n2,0 %\nEUR\n-2 959 592,24\n0,0\n-2 959 592,24\nTOTAL RO\nEUR\n-17 699 500,6\n-2 239 090,38\n-15 460 410,22\nSK\nCross Compliance\n2008\nGAEC not defined, on-the-spot checks weaknesses - claim year 2007\nFLAT RATE\n5,0 %\nEUR\n-378 504,46\n0,0\n-378 504,46\nSK\nCross Compliance\n2009\nGAEC not defined, on-the-spot checks weaknesses - claim year 2007\nFLAT RATE\n5,0 %\nEUR\n-787,35\n0,0\n-787,35\nTOTAL SK\nEUR\n-379 291,81\n0,0\n-379 291,81\n6711 TOTAL\nEUR\n-107 293 532,04\n-2 593 973,96\n-104 699 558,08\nBUDGET ITEM: 6500\nLT\nRural Development - Transitional Instrument\n2007\nWeak control system on eligibility of beneficiaries\nFLAT RATE\n5,0 %\nEUR\n-428 809,33\n0,0\n-428 809,33\nLT\nRural Development - Transitional Instrument\n2008\nWeak control system on eligibility of beneficiaries\nFLAT RATE\n5,0 %\nEUR\n-974 546,18\n0,0\n-974 546,18\nTOTAL LT\nEUR\n-1 403 355,51\n0,0\n-1 403 355,51\nPL\nRural Development - Transitional Instrument\n2007\nWeakness in management of the early retirement scheme\nFLAT RATE\n5,0 %\nEUR\n-4 422 645,43\n0,0\n-4 422 645,43\nPL\nRural Development - Transitional Instrument\n2008\nWeakness in management of the early retirement scheme\nFLAT RATE\n5,0 %\nEUR\n-1 271 573,68\n0,0\n-1 271 573,68\nPL\nRural Development - Transitional Instrument\n2009\nWeakness in management of the early retirement scheme\nFLAT RATE\n5,0 %\nEUR\n5 778,15\n0,0\n5 778,15\nTOTAL PL\nEUR\n-5 688 440,96\n0,0\n-5 688 440,96\n6500 TOTAL\nEUR\n-7 091 796,47\n0,0\n-7 091 796,47",
  "extent": "E+W+S+N.I.",
  "status": null,
  "version": "current",
  "annotations": [],
  "outstanding_effects": [],
  "provenance": {
    "source": "legislation.gov.uk",
    "source_url": "https://www.legislation.gov.uk/eudn/2013/123/annex",
    "retrieved_at": "2026-11-01T15:15:09.154888+00:00"
  },
  "licence": "Open Government Licence v3.0",
  "licence_url": "https://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/version/3/",
  "attribution": "Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Source: legislation.gov.uk, The National Archives."
}