{
  "url": "https://openlegislation.uk/eu-decision-2013-433/annex",
  "json_url": "https://openlegislation.uk/eu-decision-2013-433/annex.json",
  "legislation": "eudn/2013/433",
  "legislation_title": "Commission Implementing Decision of 13 August 2013 on excluding from European Union financing certain expenditure incurred by the Member States under the Guarantee Section of the European Agricultural Guidance and Guarantee Fund (EAGGF), under the European Agricultural Guarantee Fund (EAGF) and under the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) (notified under document C(2013) 5225) (Only the Danish, Dutch, English, Finnish, French, German, Greek, Hungarian, Italian, Latvian, Polish, Slovenian, Spanish and Swedish texts are authentic) (2013/433/EU)",
  "legislation_url": "https://openlegislation.uk/eu-decision-2013-433",
  "path": "annex",
  "kind": "annex",
  "number": null,
  "heading": null,
  "text": "MS\nMeasure\nFinancial Year\nReason\nType\n%\nCurrency\nAmount\nDeductions\nFinancial impact\nBUDGET ITEM: 6701\nBE\nFruit and Vegetables - Operational Programmes\n2008\nNon compliance with recognition criteria\nONE-OFF\nEUR\n-922 684,37\n0,0\n-922 684,37\nBE\nFruit and Vegetables - Operational Programmes\n2009\nNon compliance with recognition criteria\nONE-OFF\nEUR\n-2 091 855,58\n0,0\n-2 091 855,58\nBE\nFruit and Vegetables - Operational Programmes\n2010\nNon compliance with recognition criteria\nONE-OFF\nEUR\n-1 093 697,47\n0,0\n-1 093 697,47\nTOTAL BE\nEUR\n-4 108 237,42\n0,0\n-4 108 237,42\nDE\nStarch\n2003\ndeficiencies in the payment mechanism in a potato starch company\nFLAT RATE\n10,0 %\nEUR\n-1 901 395,66\n0,0\n-1 901 395,66\nDE\nStarch\n2004\ndeficiencies in the payment mechanism in a potato starch company\nFLAT RATE\n10,0 %\nEUR\n-1 883 474,6\n0,0\n-1 883 474,6\nDE\nStarch\n2005\ndeficiencies in the payment mechanism in a potato starch company\nFLAT RATE\n10,0 %\nEUR\n-2 408 081,08\n0,0\n-2 408 081,08\nDE\nDecoupled Direct Aids\n2007\nIneligibility of landscape features; claim years 2006-2008\nONE-OFF\nEUR\n-235 167,91\n0,0\n-235 167,91\nDE\nDecoupled Direct Aids\n2007\nWeakness of on-the-spot checks\nONE-OFF\nEUR\n-2 816,41\n0,0\n-2 816,41\nDE\nDecoupled Direct Aids\n2008\nIneligibility of landscape features; claim years 2006-2008\nONE-OFF\nEUR\n-297 448,7\n0,0\n-297 448,7\nDE\nOther Direct Aids\n2008\nIneligibility of landscape features; claim years 2006-2008\nONE-OFF\nEUR\n-525,06\n0,0\n-525,06\nDE\nOther Direct Aid - Energy Crops\n2008\nIneligibility of landscape features; claim years 2006-2008\nONE-OFF\nEUR\n-1 506,39\n0,0\n-1 506,39\nDE\nDecoupled Direct Aids\n2008\nWeakness of on-the-spot checks\nONE-OFF\nEUR\n-6 993,2\n0,0\n-6 993,2\nDE\nOther Direct Aids\n2009\nIneligibility of landscape features; claim years 2006-2008\nONE-OFF\nEUR\n-324,85\n0,0\n-324,85\nDE\nDecoupled Direct Aids\n2009\nIneligibility of landscape features; claim years 2006-2008\nONE-OFF\nEUR\n-296 114,43\n0,0\n-296 114,43\nDE\nOther Direct Aid - Energy Crops\n2009\nIneligibility of landscape features; claim years 2006-2008\nONE-OFF\nEUR\n-743,76\n0,0\n-743,76\nDE\nDecoupled Direct Aids\n2009\nWeakness of on-the-spot checks\nONE-OFF\nEUR\n-6 706,48\n0,0\n-6 706,48\nTOTAL DE\nEUR\n-7 041 298,53\n0,0\n-7 041 298,53\nDK\nDecoupled Direct Aids\n2008\ndeficiencies in the LPIS and in the on-the-spot controls\nFLAT RATE\n10,0 %\nEUR\n-8 175 799,16\n0,0\n-8 175 799,16\nDK\nDecoupled Direct Aids\n2008\ndeficiencies in the LPIS and in the on-the-spot controls\nONE-OFF\nEUR\n-894 733,68\n0,0\n-894 733,68\nDK\nDecoupled Direct Aids\n2009\ndeficiencies in the LPIS and in the on-the-spot controls\nFLAT RATE\n2,0 %\nEUR\n-1 098 146,81\n0,0\n-1 098 146,81\nTOTAL DK\nEUR\n-10 168 679,65\n0,0\n-10 168 679,65\nES\nCross Compliance\n2008\nWeaknesses in evaluation of sanction, GAEC missing, claim year 2007\nFLAT RATE\n5,0 %\nEUR\n-2 502 153,89\n-385,0\n-2 501 768,89\nES\nCross Compliance\n2008\nWeaknesses in evaluation of sanction, GAEC missing, claim year 2007\nFLAT RATE\n5,0 %\nEUR\n144,0\n0,0\n144,0\nES\nCross Compliance\n2009\nWeaknesses in evaluation of sanction, GAEC missing, claim year 2007\nFLAT RATE\n5,0 %\nEUR\n-7 122,69\n0,0\n-7 122,69\nES\nCross Compliance\n2009\nWeaknesses in evaluation of sanction, GAEC missing, claim year 2007\nFLAT RATE\n5,0 %\nEUR\n498,64\n0,0\n498,64\nES\nCross Compliance\n2009\nWeaknesses in evaluation of sanction, GAEC missing, claim year 2008\nFLAT RATE\n5,0 %\nEUR\n-2 720 206,24\n-23,84\n-2 720 182,4\nES\nCross Compliance\n2009\nWeaknesses in evaluation of sanction, GAEC missing, claim year 2008\nFLAT RATE\n5,0 %\nEUR\n238,57\n0,0\n238,57\nES\nCross Compliance\n2010\nWeaknesses in evaluation of sanction, GAEC missing, claim year 2007\nFLAT RATE\n5,0 %\nEUR\n-83,48\n0,0\n-83,48\nES\nCross Compliance\n2010\nWeaknesses in evaluation of sanction, GAEC missing, claim year 2007\nFLAT RATE\n5,0 %\nEUR\n18,98\n0,0\n18,98\nES\nCross Compliance\n2010\nWeaknesses in evaluation of sanction, GAEC missing, claim year 2008\nFLAT RATE\n5,0 %\nEUR\n-2 952,97\n0,0\n-2 952,97\nES\nCross Compliance\n2010\nWeaknesses in evaluation of sanction, GAEC missing, claim year 2008\nFLAT RATE\n5,0 %\nEUR\n69,69\n0,0\n69,69\nES\nCross Compliance\n2011\nWeaknesses in evaluation of sanction, GAEC missing, claim year 2008\nFLAT RATE\n5,0%\nEUR\n-650,69\n0,0\n-650,69\nES\nCross Compliance\n2011\nWeaknesses in evaluation of sanction, GAEC missing, claim year 2008\nFLAT RATE\n5,0 %\nEUR\n26,14\n0,0\n26,14\nTOTAL ES\nEUR\n-5 232 173,94\n-408,84\n-5 231 765,1\nFI\nPublic Storage - Cereals\n2010\nMistakes in the management in case of in-situ movements\nONE-OFF\nEUR\n-715 273,0\n0,0\n-715 273,0\nFI\nDecoupled Direct Aids\n2007\ndeficiencies in recalculation of entitlements; claim years 2006-2009\nONE-OFF\nEUR\n-1 706,39\n0,0\n-1 706,39\nFI\nDecoupled Direct Aids\n2007\nnon-appilication of sanctions for previous claim years; claim years 2006-2008\nONE-OFF\nEUR\n-830 460,62\n0,0\n-830 460,62\nFI\nDecoupled Direct Aids\n2008\ndeficiencies in recalculation of entitlements; claim years 2006-2009\nONE-OFF\nEUR\n-1 688,89\n0,0\n-1 688,89\nFI\nDecoupled Direct Aids\n2008\nnon-appilication of sanctions for previous claim years; claim years 2006-2008\nONE-OFF\nEUR\n-420 558,19\n0,0\n-420 558,19\nFI\nDecoupled Direct Aids\n2009\ndeficiencies in recalculation of entitlements; claim years 2006-2009\nONE-OFF\nEUR\n-1 695,55\n0,0\n-1 695,55\nFI\nDecoupled Direct Aids\n2009\ndeficiencies in reductions and sanctions for holdings having areas in different \"support regions\"\nONE-OFF\nEUR\n-8 789,63\n0,0\n-8 789,63\nFI\nDecoupled Direct Aids\n2009\ndeficiencies in the quality of on-the-spot checks; claim year 2008-2009\nONE-OFF\nEUR\n-747 109,66\n0,0\n-747 109,66\nFI\nDecoupled Direct Aids\n2009\nExtrapolation in cases where over-declaration is less than 3 %\nONE-OFF\nEUR\n-119 108,47\n0,0\n-119 108,47\nFI\nDecoupled Direct Aids\n2009\nnon-appilication of sanctions for previous claim years; claim years 2006-2008\nONE-OFF\nEUR\n-190 181,58\n0,0\n-190 181,58\nFI\nDecoupled Direct Aids\n2009\nretro-active recovery following LPIS updates; claim years 2008-2009\nONE-OFF\nEUR\n-488 113,0\n0,0\n-488 113,0\nFI\nDecoupled Direct Aids\n2010\ndeficiencies in recalculation of entitlements; claim years 2006-2009\nONE-OFF\nEUR\n-1 719,0\n0,0\n-1 719,0\nFI\nDecoupled Direct Aids\n2010\ndeficiencies in reductions and sanctions for holdings having areas in different \"support regions\"\nONE-OFF\nEUR\n-4 833,46\n0,0\n-4 833,46\nFI\nDecoupled Direct Aids\n2010\ndeficiencies in the quality of on-the-spot checks; claim year 2008-2009\nONE-OFF\nEUR\n-594 924,89\n0,0\n-594 924,89\nFI\nDecoupled Direct Aids\n2010\nExtrapolation in cases where over-declaration is less than 3 %\nONE-OFF\nEUR\n-97 167,26\n0,0\n-97 167,26\nFI\nDecoupled Direct Aids\n2010\nretro-active recovery following LPIS updates; claim years 2008-2009\nONE-OFF\nEUR\n-472 260,0\n0,0\n-472 260,0\nTOTAL FI\nEUR\n-4 695 589,59\n0,0\n-4 695 589,59\nFR\nPublic Storage - Alcohol\n2008\nclassification mistake of the alcohol stock movements\nONE-OFF\nEUR\n-122 165,29\n0,0\n-122 165,29\nFR\nPublic Storage - Alcohol\n2008\ndeficiencies in control and reporting mechanism\nFLAT RATE\n2,0 %\nEUR\n-282 590,55\n0,0\n-282 590,55\nFR\nPublic Storage - Skimmed-milk powder\n2009\nlate payments\nONE-OFF\nEUR\n-88 690,73\n0,0\n-88 690,73\nFR\nOther Direct Aid - Ewe and Goats\n2010\ndeficiencies in the verification of eligibility criteria\nFLAT RATE\n2,0 %\nEUR\n-1 334 634,43\n0,0\n-1 334 634,43\nTOTAL FR\nEUR\n-1 828 081,0\n0,0\n-1 828 081,0\nGB\nOther Direct Aid - Article 69 of Reg. 1782/2003 - only Ovines and Bovines\n2008\nNon-application of reductions and exclusions (administrative checks, late notifications, missing ear tags)\nONE-OFF\nEUR\n-295 796,24\n0,0\n-295 796,24\nGB\nOther Direct Aid - Article 69 of Reg. 1782/2003 - only Ovines and Bovines\n2009\nNon-application of reductions and exclusions (administrative checks, late notifications, missing ear tags)\nONE-OFF\nEUR\n-181 965,27\n0,0\n-181 965,27\nGB\nOther Direct Aid - Article 69 of Reg. 1782/2003 - only Ovines and Bovines\n2010\nNon-application of reductions and exclusions (administrative checks, late notifications, missing ear tags)\nONE-OFF\nEUR\n-299 059,21\n0,0\n-299 059,21\nGB\nDecoupled Direct Aids\n2008\nWeaknesses related to the LPIS-GIS, to the on-the-spot checks and to the payments and sanctions\nFLAT RATE\n2,05 %\nEUR\n-11 874 798,65\n-11 257,09\n-11 863 541,56\nGB\nDecoupled Direct Aids\n2009\nWeaknesses related to the LPIS-GIS, to the on-the-spot checks and to the payments and sanctions\nFLAT RATE\n2,05 %\nEUR\n-11 511 587,28\n-6 505,77\n-11 505 081,51\nGB\nDecoupled Direct Aids\n2010\nWeaknesses related to the LPIS-GIS, to the on-the-spot checks and to the payments and sanctions\nFLAT RATE\n2,05 %\nEUR\n-9 780,22\n0,0\n-9 780,22\nGB\nDecoupled Direct Aids\n2010\nWeaknesses related to the LPIS-GIS, to the on-the-spot checks and to the payments and sanctions\nONE-OFF\nEUR\n-11 538 789,46\n0,0\n-11 538 789,46\nGB\nDecoupled Direct Aids\n2009\nErrors in allocation of National Reserve\nFLAT RATE\n10,0 %\nEUR\n-5 102 862,39\n-1 020 572,48\n-4 082 289,91\nGB\nDecoupled Direct Aids\n2009\nErrors in allocation of National Reserve\nONE-OFF\nEUR\n-5 669 847,1\n-113 396,94\n-5 556 450,16\nGB\nDecoupled Direct Aids\n2010\nErrors in allocation of National Reserve\nFLAT RATE\n10,0 %\nEUR\n-3 691 257,79\n-738 251,55\n-2 953 006,24\nGB\nDecoupled Direct Aids\n2010\nErrors in allocation of National Reserve\nONE-OFF\nEUR\n-4 101 397,55\n-82 027,95\n-4 019 369,6\nTOTAL GB\nEUR\n-54 277 141,16\n-1 972 011,78\n-52 305 129,38\nGR\nFruit and Vegetables - Peaches and Pears Processing\n2006\nDeficiencies in controls of records kept by Producer Organisations, in the administrative and accounting checks of the producers and Producer Organisations; unauthorised cash payments; absence of control of tally checks and of checks on stocks\nFLAT RATE\n10,0 %\nEUR\n-1 528 781,33\n0,0\n-1 528 781,33\nGR\nFruit and Vegetables - Peaches and Pears Processing\n2007\nDeficiencies in controls of records kept by Producer Organisations, in the administrative and accounting checks of the producers and Producer Organisations; unauthorised cash payments; absence of control of tally ckecks and of checks on stocks\nFLAT RATE\n10,0 %\nEUR\n-1 489 520,41\n0,0\n-1 489 520,41\nGR\nPOSEI (2007+)\n2005\ninadequate olive cultivation GIS\nFLAT RATE\n10,0 %\nEUR\n-968 440,2\n0,0\n-968 440,2\nGR\nPOSEI (2007+)\n2006\ninadequate olive cultivation GIS\nFLAT RATE\n10,0 %\nEUR\n-1 204 598,37\n0,0\n-1 204 598,37\nTOTAL GR\nEUR\n-5 191 340,31\n0,0\n-5 191 340,31\nHU\nExport refunds- Live animals\n2008\nAbsence of tachograph checks at exit on live cattle exports\nFLAT RATE\n10,0 %\nEUR\n-34 687,5\n0,0\n-34 687,5\nHU\nExport refunds- Live animals\n2009\nAbsence of tachograph checks at exit on live cattle exports\nFLAT RATE\n10,0 %\nEUR\n-101 292,7\n0,0\n-101 292,7\nHU\nExport refunds- Live animals\n2010\nAbsence of tachograph checks at exit on live cattle exports\nFLAT RATE\n10,0 %\nEUR\n-77 256,09\n0,0\n-77 256,09\nHU\nExport refunds- Live animals\n2011\nAbsence of tachograph checks at exit on live cattle exports\nFLAT RATE\n10,0 %\nEUR\n-21 647,22\n0,0\n-21 647,22\nHU\nDecoupled Direct Aids\n2009\nWeaknesses in the LPIS-GIS (claim year 2008)\nESTIMATED\nEUR\n-4 404 011,26\n0,0\n-4 404 011,26\nHU\nDecoupled Direct Aids\n2009\nWeaknesses in the LPIS-GIS (claim year 2008)\nONE-OFF\nEUR\n-64 177,87\n0,0\n-64 177,87\nTOTAL HU\nEUR\n-4 703 072,64\n0,0\n-4 703 072,64\nIE\nExceptional support measures\n2009\nineligible amounts compensated in the framework of the exceptional support measure for the pigmeat and beef market\nONE-OFF\nEUR\n-450 450,0\n0,0\n-450 450,0\nIE\nDirect Payments\n2006\nweaknesses in the LPIS-GIS, on the spot checks and in the registration and control procedure of Common land, application of undue tolerances during administrative cross-checks, incorrect penalty calculation under art.49(1) of R.796/2004\nFLAT RATE\n2,0 %\nEUR\n-976 058,01\n0,0\n-976 058,01\nIE\nRural Development EAGGF (2000-2006) - Area related measures\n2006\nweaknesses in the LPIS-GIS, on the spot checks and in the registration and control procedure of Common land, application of undue tolerances during administrative cross-checks, incorrect penalty calculation under art.49(1) of R.796/2004\nFLAT RATE\n2,0 %\nEUR\n-174 441,64\n0,0\n-174 441,64\nIE\nRural Development EAGGF (2000-2006) - Area related measures\n2006\nweaknesses in the LPIS-GIS, on the spot checks and in the registration and control procedure of Common land, application of undue tolerances during administrative cross-checks, incorrect penalty calculation under art.49(1) of R.796/2004\nFLAT RATE\n5,0 %\nEUR\n-661 538,0\n0,0\n-661 538,0\nIE\nDirect Decoupled Aid (single payment scheme - SPS)\n2007\nweaknesses in the LPIS-GIS, on the spot checks and in the registration and control procedure of Common land, application of undue tolerances during administrative cross-checks, incorrect penalty calculation under art.49(1) of R.796/2004\nFLAT RATE\n2,0 %\nEUR\n-984 432,96\n0,0\n-984 432,96\nIE\nDirect Decoupled Aid (single payment scheme - SPS)\n2008\nweaknesses in the LPIS-GIS, on the spot checks and in the registration and control procedure of Common land, application of undue tolerances during administrative cross-checks, incorrect penalty calculation under art.49(1) of R.796/2004\nFLAT RATE\n2,0 %\nEUR\n-1 010 190,95\n0,0\n-1 010 190,95\nTOTAL IE\nEUR\n-4 257 111,56\n0,0\n-4 257 111,56\nIT\nFruit and Vegetables - Citrus Processing\n2007\nRecurrent weaknesses in the administrative, accounting and physical checks; deficiencies in the application of sanctions\nFLAT RATE\n10,0 %\nEUR\n-3 030 017,94\n0,0\n-3 030 017,94\nIT\nFruit and Vegetables - Citrus Processing\n2008\nRecurrent weaknesses in the administrative, accounting and physical checks; deficiencies in the application of sanctions\nFLAT RATE\n10,0 %\nEUR\n-1 816 747,5\n0,0\n-1 816 747,5\nIT\nFruit and Vegetables - Citrus Processing\n2009\nRecurrent weaknesses in the administrative, accounting and physical checks; deficiencies in the application of sanctions\nFLAT RATE\n10,0 %\nEUR\n-14 290,8\n0,0\n-14 290,8\nIT\nFruit and Vegetables - Citrus Processing\n2006\nRecurrent weaknesses in the administrative, accounting and physical checks; deficiencies in the application of sanctions\nFLAT RATE\n15,0 %\nEUR\n-2 434,82\n0,0\n-2 434,82\nIT\nFruit and Vegetables - Pre-recognised Producer Groups\n2007\nLack of recovery of undully spent amounts\nONE-OFF\nEUR\n-14 248,39\n0,0\n-14 248,39\nIT\nFruit and Vegetables - Citrus Processing\n2007\nRecurrent weaknesses in the administrative, accounting and physical checks; deficiencies in the application of sanctions\nFLAT RATE\n15,0 %\nEUR\n-8 102 327,0\n0,0\n-8 102 327,0\nIT\nFruit and Vegetables - Citrus Processing\n2008\nRecurrent weaknesses in the administrative, accounting and physical checks; deficiencies in the application of sanctions\nFLAT RATE\n15,0 %\nEUR\n-793 622,94\n0,0\n-793 622,94\nIT\nFruit and Vegetables - Citrus Processing\n2009\nRecurrent weaknesses in the administrative, accounting and physical checks; deficiencies in the application of sanctions\nFLAT RATE\n15,0 %\nEUR\n-24 581,67\n0,0\n-24 581,67\nIT\nPrivate Storage - Cheese\n2007\nLate payments\nONE-OFF\nEUR\n-46 792,07\n0,0\n-46 792,07\nIT\nPrivate Storage - Cheese\n2008\nLate payments\nONE-OFF\nEUR\n-125 871,36\n0,0\n-125 871,36\nIT\nPrivate Storage - Cheese\n2009\nLate payments\nONE-OFF\nEUR\n-803 060,21\n0,0\n-803 060,21\nIT\nCross Compliance\n2006\nReimbursemnt due to the overlapping corrections not taken into account in Decision 40\nFLAT RATE\n5,0 %\nEUR\n0,0\n-28 812,86\n28 812,86\nIT\nCross Compliance\n2006\nReimbursemnt due to the overlapping corrections not taken into account in Decision 40\nFLAT RATE\n10,0 %\nEUR\n0,0\n-47 081,71\n47 081,71\nTOTAL IT\nEUR\n-14 773 994,7\n-75 894,57\n-14 698 100,13\nPL\nPublic Storage - Cereals\n2006\nincorrect booking of the costs for 'removal costs' in e-Faudit application on maize and butter\nONE-OFF\nEUR\n-46 404,0\n0,0\n-46 404,0\nPL\nPublic Storage - Butter and Cream\n2006\nincorrect booking of the costs for 'removal costs' in e-Faudit application on maize and butter\nONE-OFF\nEUR\n-482,0\n0,0\n-482,0\nPL\nPublic Storage - Cereals\n2006\nincorrect booking of the value of the products in the public storage accounts (e-Faudit application) for cereals and sugar\nONE-OFF\nPLN\n8 973,39\n0,0\n8 973,39\nPL\nPublic Storage - Sugar\n2006\nincorrect booking of the value of the products in the public storage accounts (e-Faudit application) for cereals and sugar\nONE-OFF\nPLN\n-56 439,85\n0,0\n-56 439,85\nPL\nOther Direct Aid - Energy Crops\n2008\nLateness of on-the-spot checks\nFLAT RATE\n2,0 %\nEUR\n-65 091,0\n-325,46\n-64 765,54\nPL\nOther Direct Aid - Energy Crops\n2008\nWeaknesses related to the LPIS-GIS and the administrative cross-checks and to the payments, application of sanctions and retro-active recoveries\nONE-OFF\nEUR\n-21 735,51\n0,0\n-21 735,51\nPL\nDecoupled Direct Aids\n2008\nWeaknesses related to the LPIS-GIS and the administrative cross-checks and to the payments, application of sanctions and retro-active recoveries\nONE-OFF\nEUR\n-9 653 891,41\n-417 527,94\n-9 236 363,47\nPL\nOther Direct Aid - Energy Crops\n2009\nLateness of on-the-spot checks\nFLAT RATE\n2,0 %\nEUR\n-499,37\n-2,5\n-496,87\nPL\nDecoupled Direct Aids\n2009\nWeaknesses related to the LPIS-GIS and the administrative cross-checks and to the payments, application of sanctions and retro-active recoveries\nONE-OFF\nEUR\n-14 569 612,98\n-630 131,45\n-13 939 481,53\nPL\nOther Direct Aids\n2009\nWeaknesses related to the LPIS-GIS and the administrative cross-checks and to the payments, application of sanctions and retro-active recoveries\nONE-OFF\nEUR\n-22 622,77\n0,0\n-22 622,77\nPL\nOther Direct Aid - Energy Crops\n2009\nWeaknesses related to the LPIS-GIS and the administrative cross-checks and to the payments, application of sanctions and retro-active recoveries\nONE-OFF\nEUR\n-22 718,93\n0,0\n-22 718,93\nPL\nOther Direct Aid - Energy Crops\n2010\nLateness of on-the-spot checks\nFLAT RATE\n2,0 %\nEUR\n-39 676,15\n0,0\n-39 676,15\nTOTAL PL\nEUR\n-24 442 734,12\n-1 047 987,35\n-23 394 746,77\nTOTAL PL\nPLN\n-47 466,46\n0,0\n-47 466,46\nSI\nOther Direct Aid - Direct Payments\n2007\nLPIS weaknesses including ineligible payments resulting from \"bridges\"; incorrect calculation of sanctions; retro-active recoveries of undue payments\nFLAT RATE\n2,0 %\nEUR\n-274 950,95\n0,0\n-274 950,95\nSI\nOther Direct Aid - Direct Payments\n2008\nLPIS weaknesses including ineligible payments resulting from \"bridges\"; incorrect calculation of sanctions; retro-active recoveries of undue payments\nFLAT RATE\n2,0 %\nEUR\n-619,15\n0,0\n-619,15\nSI\nDirect Decoupled Aid (single payment scheme - SPS)\n2008\nLPIS weaknesses including ineligible payments resulting from \"bridges\"; incorrect calculation of sanctions; retro-active recoveries of undue payments\nFLAT RATE\n5,0 %\nEUR\n-2 439 465,62\n0,0\n-2 439 465,62\nSI\nOther Direct Aids\n2009\nLPIS weaknesses including ineligible payments resulting from \"bridges\"; incorrect calculation of sanctions; retro-active recoveries of undue payments\nFLAT RATE\n2,0 %\nEUR\n-52,03\n0,0\n-52,03\nSI\nDecoupled Direct Aids\n2009\nLPIS weaknesses including ineligible payments resulting from \"bridges\"; incorrect calculation of sanctions; retro-active recoveries of undue payments\nFLAT RATE\n2,0 %\nEUR\n-1 205 011,43\n0,0\n-1 205 011,43\nSI\nDecoupled Direct Aids\n2009\nLPIS weaknesses including ineligible payments resulting from \"bridges\"; incorrect calculation of sanctions; retro-active recoveries of undue payments\nFLAT RATE\n5,0 %\nEUR\n-5 609,71\n0,0\n-5 609,71\nSI\nDecoupled Direct Aids\n2010\nLPIS weaknesses including ineligible payments resulting from \"bridges\"; incorrect calculation of sanctions; retro-active recoveries of undue payments\nFLAT RATE\n2,0 %\nEUR\n-2 148,21\n0,0\n-2 148,21\nSI\nDecoupled Direct Aids\n2010\nLPIS weaknesses including ineligible payments resulting from \"bridges\"; incorrect calculation of sanctions; retro-active recoveries of undue payments\nFLAT RATE\n5,0 %\nEUR\n-27 603,66\n0,0\n-27 603,66\nTOTAL SI\nEUR\n-3 955 460,76\n0,0\n-3 955 460,76\n6701 TOTAL\nEUR\n-144 674 915,38\n-3 096 302,54\n-141 578 612,84\n6701 TOTAL\nPLN\n-47 466,46\n0,0\n-47 466,46\nBUDGET ITEM: 6711\nDE\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area related measures)\n2007\nIneligibility of landscape features; claim years 2006-2008\nONE-OFF\nEUR\n-10 622,49\n0,0\n-10 622,49\nDE\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area related measures)\n2007\nWeakness of on-the-spot checks\nONE-OFF\nEUR\n-26 244,45\n0,0\n-26 244,45\nDE\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area related measures)\n2008\nIneligibility of landscape features; claim years 2006-2008\nONE-OFF\nEUR\n-26 877,6\n0,0\n-26 877,6\nDE\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area related measures)\n2008\nWeakness of on-the-spot checks\nONE-OFF\nEUR\n-58 076,51\n0,0\n-58 076,51\nDE\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area related measures)\n2009\nIneligibility of landscape features; claim years 2006-2008\nONE-OFF\nEUR\n-35 471,28\n0,0\n-35 471,28\nDE\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area related measures)\n2009\nWeakness of on-the-spot checks\nONE-OFF\nEUR\n-44 521,8\n0,0\n-44 521,8\nTOTAL DE\nEUR\n-201 814,13\n0,0\n-201 814,13\nDK\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area related measures)\n2008\ndeficiencies in the LPIS and in the on-the-spot controls\nFLAT RATE\n10,0 %\nEUR\n-885 368,35\n0,0\n-885 368,35\nDK\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area related measures)\n2008\ndeficiencies in the LPIS and in the on-the-spot controls\nONE-OFF\nEUR\n-21 910,78\n0,0\n-21 910,78\nDK\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area related measures)\n2009\ndeficiencies in the LPIS and in the on-the-spot controls\nFLAT RATE\n2,0 %\nEUR\n-163 737,87\n0,0\n-163 737,87\nDK\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area related measures)\n2009\ndeficiencies in the LPIS and in the on-the-spot controls\nFLAT RATE\n10,0 %\nEUR\n-107 621,71\n0,0\n-107 621,71\nDK\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area related measures)\n2010\ndeficiencies in the LPIS and in the on-the-spot controls\nFLAT RATE\n10,0 %\nEUR\n-107 845,8\n0,0\n-107 845,8\nTOTAL DK\nEUR\n-1 286 484,51\n0,0\n-1 286 484,51\nES\nCross Compliance\n2008\nWeaknesses in evaluation of sanction, GAEC missing, claim year 2007\nFLAT RATE\n5,0 %\nEUR\n-41 632,02\n0,0\n-41 632,02\nES\nCross Compliance\n2009\nWeaknesses in evaluation of sanction, GAEC missing, claim year 2007\nFLAT RATE\n5,0 %\nEUR\n-59,42\n0,0\n-59,42\nES\nCross Compliance\n2009\nWeaknesses in evaluation of sanction, GAEC missing, claim year 2008\nFLAT RATE\n5,0 %\nEUR\n-35 698,54\n0,0\n-35 698,54\nES\nCross Compliance\n2010\nWeaknesses in evaluation of sanction, GAEC missing, claim year 2007\nFLAT RATE\n5,0 %\nEUR\n-5,65\n0,0\n-5,65\nES\nCross Compliance\n2010\nWeaknesses in evaluation of sanction, GAEC missing, claim year 2008\nFLAT RATE\n5,0 %\nEUR\n-113,2\n0,0\n-113,2\nES\nCross Compliance\n2011\nWeaknesses in evaluation of sanction, GAEC missing, claim year 2008\nFLAT RATE\n5,0 %\nEUR\n-146,92\n0,0\n-146,92\nES\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 1+3 - Investment orientated measures (2007-2013)\n2009\nnot correctly carried out verification of the respect of the selection criterion no. 15\nFLAT RATE\n5,0 %\nEUR\n-92 988,5\n0,0\n-92 988,5\nES\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 1+3 - Investment orientated measures (2007-2013)\n2010\nnot correctly carried out verification of the respect of the selection criterion no. 15\nFLAT RATE\n5,0 %\nEUR\n-75 946,93\n0,0\n-75 946,93\nES\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 1+3 - Investment orientated measures (2007-2013)\n2011\nnot correctly carried out verification of the respect of the selection criterion no. 15\nFLAT RATE\n5,0 %\nEUR\n-102 417,68\n0,0\n-102 417,68\nES\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area related measures)\n2008\nWeaknesses of the on-the-spot controls\nFLAT RATE\n2,0 %\nEUR\n-4 456,32\n0,0\n-4 456,32\nES\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area related measures)\n2008\nWeaknesses of the on-the-spot controls\nFLAT RATE\n5,0 %\nEUR\n-11 935,48\n-525,56\n-11 409,92\nES\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area related measures)\n2009\nWeaknesses of the on-the-spot controls\nFLAT RATE\n2,0 %\nEUR\n-5 969,01\n0,0\n-5 969,01\nES\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area related measures)\n2009\nWeaknesses of the on-the-spot controls\nFLAT RATE\n5,0 %\nEUR\n-355 791,09\n0,0\n-355 791,09\nES\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area related measures)\n2010\nWeaknesses of the on-the-spot controls\nFLAT RATE\n2,0 %\nEUR\n-6 137,24\n0,0\n-6 137,24\nES\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area related measures)\n2010\nWeaknesses of the on-the-spot controls\nFLAT RATE\n5,0 %\nEUR\n-791 741,75\n0,0\n-791 741,75\nTOTAL ES\nEUR\n-1 525 039,75\n-525,56\n-1 524 514,19\nFI\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area related measures)\n2010\nWeaknesses in verification of fulfilment of agri-environment commitments\nONE-OFF\nEUR\n-286 100,58\n0,0\n-286 100,58\nFI\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, non area related measures)\n2009\nlack of verification of annual veterinary certificates\nFLAT RATE\n5,0 %\nEUR\n621,39\n0,0\n621,39\nFI\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, non area related measures)\n2010\nlack of verification of annual veterinary certificates\nFLAT RATE\n5,0 %\nEUR\n-155 565,56\n0,0\n-155 565,56\nFI\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, non area related measures)\n2011\nlack of verification of annual veterinary certificates\nFLAT RATE\n5,0 %\nEUR\n-178 498,21\n0,0\n-178 498,21\nTOTAL FI\nEUR\n-619 542,96\n0,0\n-619 542,96\nGB\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area related measures)\n2008\nWeaknesses related to the LPIS-GIS, to the on-the-spot checks and to the payments and sanctions\nFLAT RATE\n5,0 %\nEUR\n-1 925 838,04\n0,0\n-1 925 838,04\nGB\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, non area related measures)\n2008\nWeaknesses related to the LPIS-GIS, to the on-the-spot checks and to the payments and sanctions\nFLAT RATE\n5,0 %\nEUR\n-172 593,69\n0,0\n-172 593,69\nGB\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area related measures)\n2009\nWeaknesses related to the LPIS-GIS, to the on-the-spot checks and to the payments and sanctions\nFLAT RATE\n5,0 %\nEUR\n-956 216,42\n0,0\n-956 216,42\nGB\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, non area related measures)\n2009\nWeaknesses related to the LPIS-GIS, to the on-the-spot checks and to the payments and sanctions\nFLAT RATE\n5,0 %\nEUR\n-27 483,84\n0,0\n-27 483,84\nGB\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area related measures)\n2010\nWeaknesses related to the LPIS-GIS, to the on-the-spot checks and to the payments and sanctions\nFLAT RATE\n5,0 %\nEUR\n-2 371 120,39\n0,0\n-2 371 120,39\nGB\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, non area related measures)\n2010\nWeaknesses related to the LPIS-GIS, to the on-the-spot checks and to the payments and sanctions\nFLAT RATE\n5,0 %\nEUR\n-66 227,19\n0,0\n-66 227,19\nGB\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area related measures)\n2009\nLack of traceability for on-the-spot-checks\nFLAT RATE\n2,0 %\nEUR\n-24 281,8\n-14 359,03\n-9 922,77\nGB\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area related measures)\n2010\nLack of traceability for on-the-spot-checks\nFLAT RATE\n2,0 %\nEUR\n-61 967,26\n-160,3\n-61 806,96\nGB\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area related measures)\n2011\nLack of traceability for on-the-spot-checks\nFLAT RATE\n2,0 %\nEUR\n-48 023,61\n0,0\n-48 023,61\nTOTAL GB\nEUR\n-5 653 752,24\n-14 519,33\n-5 639 232,91\nHU\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area related measures)\n2009\nWeaknesses in the LPIS Art. 19 (claim year 2008)\nESTIMATED\nEUR\n-91 666,28\n0,0\n-91 666,28\nHU\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area related measures)\n2009\nWeaknesses in the LPIS Art. 20 (claim year 2008)\nESTIMATED\nEUR\n-15 653,21\n0,0\n-15 653,21\nHU\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area related measures)\n2009\nWeaknesses in the LPIS-GIS (claim year 2008)\nESTIMATED\nEUR\n-419 699,24\n0,0\n-419 699,24\nHU\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 1 - Measures with flat rate support (2007-2013)\n2008\nEligibility criterion was not correctly verified by the Member State; weakness in the calculation of the aid\nFLAT RATE\n10,0 %\nEUR\n-421 885,53\n0,0\n-421 885,53\nHU\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 1+3 - Investment orientated measures (2007-2013)\n2008\nKey controls have not been applied in the depth required by Regulation (EC) No. 1975/2006\nESTIMATED\nEUR\n-135 576,72\n0,0\n-135 576,72\nHU\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 1 - Measures with flat rate support (2007-2013)\n2009\nEligibility criterion was not correctly verified by the Member State; weakness in the calculation of the aid\nFLAT RATE\n10,0 %\nEUR\n-1 287 110,85\n0,0\n-1 287 110,85\nHU\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 1+3 - Investment orientated measures (2007-2013)\n2009\nKey controls have not been applied in the depth required by Regulation (EC) No. 1975/2006\nESTIMATED\nEUR\n-376 604,75\n0,0\n-376 604,75\nHU\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 1 - Measures with flat rate support (2007-2013)\n2010\nEligibility criterion was not correctly verified by the Member State; weakness in the calculation of the aid\nFLAT RATE\n10,0 %\nEUR\n-252 412,16\n0,0\n-252 412,16\nHU\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 1+3 - Investment orientated measures (2007-2013)\n2010\nKey controls have not been applied in the depth required by Regulation (EC) No. 1975/2006\nESTIMATED\nEUR\n-120 805,7\n0,0\n-120 805,7\nTOTAL HU\nEUR\n-3 121 414,44\n0,0\n-3 121 414,44\nIE\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area related measures)\n2007\nweaknesses in the LPIS-GIS, on the spot checks and in the registration and control procedure of Common land, application of undue tolerances during administrative cross-checks, incorrect penalty calculation under art.49(1) of R.796/2004\nFLAT RATE\n2,0 %\nEUR\n-111 165,09\n0,0\n-111 165,09\nIE\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area related measures)\n2007\nweaknesses in the LPIS-GIS, on the spot checks and in the registration and control procedure of Common land, application of undue tolerances during administrative cross-checks, incorrect penalty calculation under art.49(1) of R.796/2004\nFLAT RATE\n5,0 %\nEUR\n-790 740,0\n0,0\n-790 740,0\nIE\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area related measures)\n2008\nweaknesses in the LPIS-GIS, on the spot checks and in the registration and control procedure of Common land, application of undue tolerances during administrative cross-checks, incorrect penalty calculation under art.49(1) of R.796/2004\nFLAT RATE\n2,0 %\nEUR\n-195 334,84\n0,0\n-195 334,84\nIE\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area related measures)\n2008\nweaknesses in the LPIS-GIS, on the spot checks and in the registration and control procedure of Common land, application of undue tolerances during administrative cross-checks, incorrect penalty calculation under art.49(1) of R.796/2004\nFLAT RATE\n5,0 %\nEUR\n-635 490,0\n0,0\n-635 490,0\nTOTAL IE\nEUR\n-1 732 729,93\n0,0\n-1 732 729,93\nLU\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area related measures)\n2009\ndeficiencies in control of animals and in traceability of controls, lack of controls of the delegated on-the-spot controls and lack of comaprison of the controls' results\nFLAT RATE\n2,0 %\nEUR\n-145 895,97\n0,0\n-145 895,97\nLU\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area related measures)\n2010\ndeficiencies in control of animals and in traceability of controls, lack of controls of the delegated on-the-spot controls and lack of comaprison of the controls' results\nFLAT RATE\n2,0 %\nEUR\n-133 296,52\n0,0\n-133 296,52\nTOTAL LU\nEUR\n-279 192,49\n0,0\n-279 192,49\nLV\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 1 - Measures with flat rate support (2007-2013)\n2008\nInsufficiant control on the turnover of the beneficiaries (eligibility criterion)\nFLAT RATE\n5,0 %\nEUR\n-2 052,65\n0,0\n-2 052,65\nLV\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 1 - Measures with flat rate support (2007-2013)\n2008\nNo control at all on the turnover of the beneficiaries (eligibility criterion)\nFLAT RATE\n10,0 %\nEUR\n-3 177,15\n0,0\n-3 177,15\nLV\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 1 - Measures with flat rate support (2007-2013)\n2009\nInsufficiant control on the turnover of the beneficiaries (eligibility criterion)\nFLAT RATE\n5,0 %\nEUR\n-180 994,16\n0,0\n-180 994,16\nLV\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 1 - Measures with flat rate support (2007-2013)\n2009\nNo control at all on the turnover of the beneficiaries (eligibility criterion)\nFLAT RATE\n10,0 %\nEUR\n-280 147,49\n0,0\n-280 147,49\nLV\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 1 - Measures with flat rate support (2007-2013)\n2010\nInsufficiant control on the turnover of the beneficiaries (eligibility criterion)\nFLAT RATE\n5,0 %\nEUR\n-52 158,43\n0,0\n-52 158,43\nLV\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 1 - Measures with flat rate support (2007-2013)\n2010\nNo control at all on the turnover of the beneficiaries (eligibility criterion)\nFLAT RATE\n10,0 %\nEUR\n-80 732,19\n0,0\n-80 732,19\nLV\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 1 - Measures with flat rate support (2007-2013)\n2011\nInsufficiant control on the turnover of the beneficiaries (eligibility criterion)\nFLAT RATE\n5,0 %\nEUR\n-391,95\n0,0\n-391,95\nLV\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 1 - Measures with flat rate support (2007-2013)\n2011\nNo control at all on the turnover of the beneficiaries (eligibility criterion)\nFLAT RATE\n10,0 %\nEUR\n-606,67\n0,0\n-606,67\nTOTAL LV\nEUR\n-600 260,69\n0,0\n-600 260,69\nPL\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area related measures)\n2008\nWeaknesses related to the LPIS-GIS and the administrative cross-checks and to the payments, application of sanctions and retro-active recoveries\nONE-OFF\nEUR\n-6 803 699,79\n-3 550 419,56\n-3 253 280,23\nPL\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area related measures)\n2009\nWeaknesses related to the LPIS-GIS and the administrative cross-checks and to the payments, application of sanctions and retro-active recoveries\nONE-OFF\nEUR\n-7 977 501,3\n-4 162 952,15\n-3 814 549,15\nTOTAL PL\nEUR\n-14 781 201,09\n-7 713 371,71\n-7 067 829,38\nSI\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area related measures)\n2008\nLPIS weaknesses including ineligible payments resulting from \"bridges\"\nONE-OFF\nEUR\n-3 486,92\n0,0\n-3 486,92\nSI\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area related measures)\n2008\nRetro-active recoveries of undue payments\nONE-OFF\nEUR\n-1 341 839,55\n0,0\n-1 341 839,55\nSI\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area related measures)\n2009\nLPIS weaknesses including ineligible payments resulting from \"bridges\"\nONE-OFF\nEUR\n-1 334 760,31\n0,0\n-1 334 760,31\nSI\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area related measures)\n2010\nLPIS weaknesses including ineligible payments resulting from \"bridges\"\nONE-OFF\nEUR\n-744,29\n0,0\n-744,29\nTOTAL SI\nEUR\n-2 680 831,07\n0,0\n-2 680 831,07\n6711 TOTAL\nEUR\n-32 482 263,3\n-7 728 416,6\n-24 753 846,7\nBUDGET ITEM: 6500\nHU\nRural Development - Transitional Instrument\n2007\nEligibility criterion was not correctly verified by the Member State; weakness in the calculation of the aid\nFLAT RATE\n10,0 %\nEUR\n-575 800,83\n0,0\n-575 800,83\nTOTAL HU\nEUR\n-575 800,83\n0,0\n-575 800,83\nLV\nRural Development - Transitional Instrument\n2008\nInsufficiant control on the turnover of the beneficiaries (eligibility criterion)\nFLAT RATE\n5,0 %\nEUR\n-247 891,63\n0,0\n-247 891,63\nLV\nRural Development - Transitional Instrument\n2008\nNo control at all on the turnover of the beneficiaries (eligibility criterion)\nFLAT RATE\n10,0 %\nEUR\n-383 693,13\n0,0\n-383 693,13\nTOTAL LV\nEUR\n-631 584,76\n0,0\n-631 584,76\nSI\nRural Development - Transitional Instrument\n2007\nLPIS weakness\nFLAT RATE\n2,0 %\nEUR\n-1 453 839,27\n0,0\n-1 453 839,27\nTOTAL SI\nEUR\n-1 453 839,27\n0,0\n-1 453 839,27\n6500 TOTAL\nEUR\n-2 661 224,86\n0,0\n-2 661 224,86",
  "extent": "E+W+S+N.I.",
  "status": null,
  "version": "current",
  "annotations": [],
  "outstanding_effects": [],
  "provenance": {
    "source": "legislation.gov.uk",
    "source_url": "https://www.legislation.gov.uk/eudn/2013/433/annex",
    "retrieved_at": "2026-11-01T15:15:01.656986+00:00"
  },
  "licence": "Open Government Licence v3.0",
  "licence_url": "https://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/version/3/",
  "attribution": "Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Source: legislation.gov.uk, The National Archives."
}