{
  "url": "https://openlegislation.uk/eu-decision-2014-191/annex",
  "json_url": "https://openlegislation.uk/eu-decision-2014-191/annex.json",
  "legislation": "eudn/2014/191",
  "legislation_title": "Commission Implementing Decision of 4 April 2014 on excluding from European Union financing certain expenditure incurred by the Member States under the Guarantee Section of the European Agricultural Guidance and Guarantee Fund (EAGGF), under the European Agricultural Guarantee Fund (EAGF) and under the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) (notified under document C(2014) 2008) (Only the Danish, English, Finnish, French, German, Greek, Italian, Portuguese, Romanian, Slovenian, Spanish and Swedish texts are authentic) (2014/191/EU)",
  "legislation_url": "https://openlegislation.uk/eu-decision-2014-191",
  "path": "annex",
  "kind": "annex",
  "number": null,
  "heading": null,
  "text": "MS\nMeasure\nFinancial Year\nReason\nType\n%\nCurrency\nAmount\nDeductions\nFinancial impact\nBUDGET ITEM: 6701\nDK\nFruit and Vegetables — Operational Programmes\n2008\nSevere weaknesses in control of several recognition criteria and deficiencies in administrative and on-the-spot checks\nFLAT RATE\n10,00 %\nEUR\n– 287 632,19\n0,00\n– 287 632,19\nDK\nFruit and Vegetables — Operational Programmes\n2008\nIneligible costs for organic plant protection materials\nONE-OFF\nEUR\n– 4 765,48\n0,00\n– 4 765,48\nDK\nFruit and Vegetables — Operational Programmes\n2008\nIneligible producer organisation\nONE-OFF\nEUR\n– 181 675,81\n0,00\n– 181 675,81\nDK\nFruit and Vegetables — Operational Programmes\n2009\nSevere weaknesses in control of several recognition criteria and deficiencies in administrative and on-the-spot checks\nFLAT RATE\n10,00 %\nEUR\n– 317 109,84\n0,00\n– 317 109,84\nDK\nFruit and Vegetables — Operational Programmes\n2009\nIneligible producer organisation\nONE-OFF\nEUR\n– 203 273,58\n0,00\n– 203 273,58\nDK\nFruit and Vegetables — Operational Programmes\n2009\nIneligible costs for organic plant protection materials\nONE-OFF\nEUR\n– 27 548,7\n0,00\n– 27 548,7\nDK\nFruit and Vegetables — Operational Programmes\n2010\nSevere weaknesses in control of several recognition criteria and deficiencies in administrative and on-the-spot checks\nFLAT RATE\n10,00 %\nEUR\n0,96\n0,00\n0,96\nDK\nFruit and Vegetables — Operational Programmes\n2010\nIneligible producer organisation\nONE-OFF\nEUR\n– 1 183,25\n0,00\n– 1 183,25\nDK\nFruit and Vegetables — Operational Programmes\n2010\nIneligible costs for organic plant protection materials\nONE-OFF\nEUR\n– 9,57\n0,00\n– 9,57\nDK\nCross Compliance\n2009\n6 GAEC missing, no check on minimum requirements for plant protection products, CY 2008\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 4 879 877,97\n– 7 357,88\n– 4 872 520,09\nDK\nCross Compliance\n2010\n6 GAEC missing, no check on minimum requirements for plant protection products, CY 2008\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 1 753,74\n– 4,49\n– 1 749,25\nDK\nCross Compliance\n2010\nIncorrect calculation of sanctions, CY 2009\nONE-OFF\nEUR\n– 31 895,68\n– 301,59\n– 31 594,09\nDK\nCross Compliance\n2011\n6 GAEC missing, no check on minimum requirements for plant protection products, CY 2008\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 119,58\n0,00\n– 119,58\nDK\nCross Compliance\n2011\nIncorrect calculation of sanctions, CY 2010\nONE-OFF\nEUR\n– 3 230,67\n0,00\n– 3 230,67\nTOTAL DK\nEUR\n– 5 940 075,1\n– 7 663,96\n– 5 932 411,14\nES\nIrregularities\n2007\nReimbursement due to the incorrect application of the 50/50 rule for 4 cases\nONE-OFF\nEUR\n721 332,88\n0,00\n721 332,88\nES\nIrregularities\n2007\nNon-reporting of interest in the Annex III table of financial year 2006\nONE-OFF\nEUR\n– 1 360 592,37\n0,00\n– 1 360 592,37\nES\nIrregularities\n2008\nNon-reporting of interest in the Annex III table of financial year 2007\nONE-OFF\nEUR\n– 230 803,77\n0,00\n– 230 803,77\nES\nIrregularities\n2011\nNon-respect of Article 32(8)(a) of R.1290/2005\nONE-OFF\nEUR\n– 165 390,13\n0,00\n– 165 390,13\nES\nIrregularities\n2011\nNon-respect of Article 32(4)(a) of R.1290/2005\nONE-OFF\nEUR\n– 754 473,76\n0,00\n– 754 473,76\nES\nIrregularities\n2011\nIncorrect date of primary administrative or judicial finding in the Annex III table (case 02220090118)\nONE-OFF\nEUR\n– 350 053,18\n0,00\n– 350 053,18\nES\nIrregularities\n2011\nNegligence in the recovery of a debt case\nONE-OFF\nEUR\n– 6 447 032,48\n0,00\n– 6 447 032,48\nTOTAL ES\nEUR\n– 8 587 012,81\n0,00\n– 8 587 012,81\nFI\nCross Compliance\n2007\n1 GAEC missing, lenient sanctioning system, CY 2007\nFLAT RATE\n2,00 %\nEUR\n144,79\n0,00\n144,79\nFI\nCross Compliance\n2007\n1 GAEC missing, lenient sanctioning system, CY 2006\nFLAT RATE\n2,00 %\nEUR\n52,13\n0,00\n52,13\nFI\nCross Compliance\n2007\n1 GAEC missing, lenient sanctioning system, CY 2006\nFLAT RATE\n2,00 %\nEUR\n– 25 717,74\n0,00\n– 25 717,74\nFI\nCross Compliance\n2007\nUse of 0 % sanction, CY 2006\nONE-OFF\nEUR\n– 45 508,78\n– 54,61\n– 45 454,17\nFI\nCross Compliance\n2008\n1 GAEC missing, lenient sanctioning system, CY 2008\nFLAT RATE\n0,00 %\nEUR\n221,44\n0,00\n221,44\nFI\nCross Compliance\n2008\n1 GAEC missing, lenient sanctioning system, CY 2007\nFLAT RATE\n2,00 %\nEUR\n146,35\n0,00\n146,35\nFI\nCross Compliance\n2008\n1 GAEC missing, lenient sanctioning system, CY 2006\nFLAT RATE\n2,00 %\nEUR\n2 726,86\n– 2,99\n2 729,85\nFI\nCross Compliance\n2008\n1 GAEC missing, lenient sanctioning system, CY 2007\nFLAT RATE\n2,00 %\nEUR\n– 1 088 571,54\n– 1 585,04\n– 1 086 986,5\nFI\nCross Compliance\n2009\n1 GAEC missing, lenient sanctioning system, CY 2008\nFLAT RATE\n0,00 %\nEUR\n119,47\n0,00\n119,47\nFI\nCross Compliance\n2009\n1 GAEC missing, lenient sanctioning system, CY 2007\nFLAT RATE\n2,00 %\nEUR\n– 0,19\n0,00\n– 0,19\nFI\nCross Compliance\n2009\n1 GAEC missing, lenient sanctioning system, CY 2007\nFLAT RATE\n2,00 %\nEUR\n– 219,63\n– 86,94\n– 132,69\nFI\nCross Compliance\n2009\n1 GAEC missing, lenient sanctioning system, CY 2008\nFLAT RATE\n2,00 %\nEUR\n– 1 090 265,16\n– 3 306,07\n– 1 086 959,09\nFI\nCross Compliance\n2009\n1 GAEC missing, lenient sanctioning system, CY 2006\nFLAT RATE\n2,00 %\nEUR\n– 0,59\n0,00\n– 0,59\nFI\nCross Compliance\n2010\n1 GAEC missing, lenient sanctioning system, CY 2008\nFLAT RATE\n0,00 %\nEUR\n5,21\n0,00\n5,21\nFI\nCross Compliance\n2010\n1 GAEC missing, lenient sanctioning system, CY 2007\nFLAT RATE\n2,00 %\nEUR\n– 91,71\n0,00\n– 91,71\nFI\nCross Compliance\n2010\n1 GAEC missing, lenient sanctioning system, CY 2008\nFLAT RATE\n2,00 %\nEUR\n– 159,46\n0,00\n– 159,46\nTOTAL FI\nEUR\n– 2 247 118,55\n– 5 035,65\n– 2 242 082,9\nFR\nFruit and Vegetables — Operational Programmes\n2007\nVarious ineligible aid payments\nONE-OFF\nEUR\n– 698 322,85\n0,00\n– 698 322,85\nFR\nFruit and Vegetables — Operational Programmes\n2008\nVarious ineligible aid payments\nONE-OFF\nEUR\n– 1 600 581,03\n0,00\n– 1 600 581,03\nFR\nFruit and Vegetables — Operational Programmes\n2009\nVarious ineligible aid payments\nONE-OFF\nEUR\n– 3 201 489,94\n0,00\n– 3 201 489,94\nFR\nFruit and Vegetables — Operational Programmes\n2010\nVarious ineligible aid payments\nONE-OFF\nEUR\n– 219 199,04\n0,00\n– 219 199,04\nFR\nFruit and Vegetables — Operational Programmes\n2011\nVarious ineligible aid payments\nONE-OFF\nEUR\n– 13 068,19\n0,00\n– 13 068,19\nFR\nEntitlements\n2007\nUndue allocation of National Reserve\nFLAT RATE\n10,00 %\nEUR\n– 12 098 866,64\n– 72 593,2\n– 12 026 273,44\nFR\nEntitlements\n2007\nUndue allocation of National Reserve\nONE-OFF\nEUR\n– 47 626 478,62\n– 95 252,96\n– 47 531 225,66\nFR\nEntitlements\n2008\nUndue allocation of National Reserve\nFLAT RATE\n10,00 %\nEUR\n– 12 098 866,64\n– 60 494,33\n– 12 038 372,31\nFR\nEntitlements\n2008\nUndue allocation of National Reserve\nONE-OFF\nEUR\n– 47 626 478,62\n– 238 132,39\n– 47 388 346,23\nFR\nEntitlements\n2009\nUndue allocation of National Reserve\nFLAT RATE\n10,00 %\nEUR\n– 12 098 866,64\n– 60 494,33\n– 12 038 372,31\nFR\nEntitlements\n2009\nUndue allocation of National Reserve\nONE-OFF\nEUR\n– 47 626 478,62\n– 238 132,39\n– 47 388 346,23\nFR\nEntitlements\n2010\nUndue allocation of National Reserve\nFLAT RATE\n10,00 %\nEUR\n– 12 098 866,64\n– 24 197,73\n– 12 074 668,91\nFR\nEntitlements\n2010\nUndue allocation of National Reserve\nONE-OFF\nEUR\n– 47 626 478,62\n– 285 758,87\n– 47 340 719,75\nFR\nCross Compliance\n2009\nReimbursement for correction included in Decision 43 linked to audit XC/2009/003/FR\nFLAT RATE\n2,00 %\nEUR\n157 245,53\n0,00\n157 245,53\nFR\nCross Compliance\n2010\nReimbursement for correction included in Decision 43 linked to audit XC/2009/003/FR\nFLAT RATE\n2,00 %\nEUR\n26 673,71\n0,00\n26 673,71\nTOTAL FR\nEUR\n– 244 450 122,85\n– 1 075 056,2\n– 243 375 066,65\nGB\nFruit and Vegetables — Operational Programmes\n2006\nBookkeeping/accounting errors\nONE-OFF\nEUR\n– 68 009,01\n0,00\n– 68 009,01\nGB\nFruit and Vegetables — Operational Programmes\n2007\nBookkeeping/accounting errors\nONE-OFF\nEUR\n– 62 104,18\n0,00\n– 62 104,18\nGB\nFruit and Vegetables — Operational Programmes\n2008\nBookkeeping/accounting errors\nONE-OFF\nEUR\n– 33 722,85\n0,00\n– 33 722,85\nGB\n_Recoveries\n2009\nBookkeeping/accounting errors\nONE-OFF\nEUR\n– 55 487,5\n0,00\n– 55 487,5\nGB\n_Recoveries\n2010\nBookkeeping/accounting errors\nONE-OFF\nEUR\n– 46 754,53\n0,00\n– 46 754,53\nGB\n_Recoveries\n2011\nBookkeeping/accounting errors\nONE-OFF\nEUR\n– 299 733,08\n0,00\n– 299 733,08\nGB\nOther Direct Aid — Article 68-72 of Reg. 73/2009\n2011\nNon-application of reductions/exclusions and undue payments to non-identified animals\nONE-OFF\nEUR\n– 194 394,22\n0,00\n– 194 394,22\nGB\nCross Compliance\n2008\nIneffective control of SMR 8a, CY 2007\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 257 134,0\n0,00\n– 257 134,0\nGB\nCross Compliance\n2008\nNon or incorrect application of regulatory sanctions, CY 2007\nONE-OFF\nEUR\n– 757 135,0\n0,00\n– 757 135,0\nGB\nCross Compliance\n2009\nIneffective control of SMR 8a, CY 2008\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 240 326,0\n0,00\n– 240 326,0\nGB\nCross Compliance\n2009\nNon or incorrect application of regulatory sanctions, CY 2008\nONE-OFF\nEUR\n– 423 317,0\n0,00\n– 423 317,0\nGB\nCross Compliance\n2010\nIneffective control of SMR 8a, CY 2009\nFLAT RATE\n2,00 %\nEUR\n– 252 305,0\n0,00\n– 252 305,0\nGB\nCross Compliance\n2010\nNon or incorrect application of regulatory sanctions, CY 2009\nONE-OFF\nEUR\n– 31 208,0\n0,00\n– 31 208,0\nGB\nCross Compliance\n2009\nLenient sanctioning system for SMR 7 and 8, no follow-up of minor NC, ineffective control of GAEC, CY 2008\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 2 949 043,26\n– 59 941,88\n– 2 889 101,38\nGB\nCross Compliance\n2010\nIneffective control of GAEC and SMR 2, 4 and 8, CY 2009\nFLAT RATE\n2,00 %\nEUR\n– 1 175 238,88\n– 24 310,41\n– 1 150 928,47\nGB\nCross Compliance\n2010\nIneffective control of GAEC and SMR 2, 4 and 8, CY 2009\nFLAT RATE\n2,00 %\nEUR\n1 901,1\n0,00\n1 901,1\nGB\nCross Compliance\n2010\nLenient sanctioning system for SMR 7 and 8, no follow-up of minor non-compliance, ineffective control of GAEC, CY 2008\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 4 961,22\n– 34,71\n– 4 926,51\nGB\nCross Compliance\n2011\nIneffective control of GAEC and SMR 2, 4 and 8, CY 2010\nFLAT RATE\n2,00 %\nEUR\n795,26\n0,00\n795,26\nGB\nCross Compliance\n2011\nIneffective control of GAEC and SMR 2, 4 and 8, CY 2009\nFLAT RATE\n2,00 %\nEUR\n– 58,63\n0,00\n– 58,63\nGB\nCross Compliance\n2011\nIneffective control of GAEC and SMR 2, 4 and 8, CY 2009\nFLAT RATE\n2,00 %\nEUR\n– 879,96\n0,00\n– 879,96\nGB\nCross Compliance\n2011\nIneffective control of GAEC and SMR 2, 4 and 8, CY 2010\nFLAT RATE\n2,00 %\nEUR\n– 1 164 633,01\n– 388,79\n– 1 164 244,22\nGB\nCross Compliance\n2011\nLenient sanctioning system for SMR 7 and 8, no follow-up of minor non-compliance, ineffective control of GAEC, CY 2008\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 440,27\n0,00\n– 440,27\nTOTAL GB\nEUR\n– 8 014 189,24\n– 84 675,79\n– 7 929 513,45\nGR\nFruit and Vegetables — Peaches and Pears Processing\n2008\nDeficient physical checks on 5 % of the areas and incomplete information on products sold on the fresh market in Producer Organisation's records\nFLAT RATE\n10,00 %\nEUR\n– 682 302,86\n0,00\n– 682 302,86\nTOTAL GR\nEUR\n– 682 302,86\n0,00\n– 682 302,86\nIT\nOther Direct Aid — Article 69 of Reg. 1782/2003 — only Ovines and Bovines\n2007\nInsufficient quality and inadequate timing of the on-the-spot checks, weaknesses in the control of eligibility of claimed animals, wrong application of sanctions for bovine\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 1 639 734,17\n– 4 187,86\n– 1 635 546,31\nIT\nEntitlements\n2007\nIncorrect application of the regulation regarding the allocation of the special entitlements\nONE-OFF\nEUR\n– 475 405,85\n– 2 852,44\n– 472 553,41\nIT\nOther Direct Aid — Article 69 of Reg. 1782/2003 — only Ovines and Bovines\n2008\nInsufficient quality and inadequate timing of the on-the-spot checks, weaknesses in the control of eligibility of claimed animals, wrong application of sanctions for bovine\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 1 697 012,09\n– 8 100,59\n– 1 688 911,5\nIT\nEntitlements\n2008\nIncorrect application of the regulation regarding the allocation of the special entitlements\nONE-OFF\nEUR\n– 577 691,9\n– 3 466,14\n– 574 225,76\nIT\nOther Direct Aid — Article 69 of Reg. 1782/2003 — only Ovines and Bovines\n2009\nInsufficient quality and inadequate timing of the on-the-spot checks, weaknesses in the control of eligibility of claimed animals, wrong application of sanctions for bovine\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 1 701 995,62\n0,00\n– 1 701 995,62\nIT\nEntitlements\n2009\nIncorrect application of the regulation regarding the allocation of the special entitlements\nONE-OFF\nEUR\n– 279 114,77\n0,00\n– 279 114,77\nIT\nEntitlements\n2010\nIncorrect application of the regulation regarding the allocation of the special entitlements\nONE-OFF\nEUR\n– 534 365,66\n0,00\n– 534 365,66\nIT\nAccreditation Paying Agency\n2010\ndeficiencies in the accreditation criteria for EAGF (debtors)\nFLAT RATE\n16,00 %\nEUR\n– 623 731,0\n0,00\n– 623 731,0\nIT\nAccreditation Paying Agency\n2010\ndeficiencies in the accreditation criteria for EAGF\nFLAT RATE\n16,00 %\nEUR\n– 398 672,0\n0,00\n– 398 672,0\nIT\nClearance of accounts — 50/50 rule Clearance\n2006\nReimbursement following the judgment of Court of Justice in case T-267/07\nONE-OFF\nEUR\n2 114 199,16\n0,00\n2 114 199,16\nTOTAL IT\nEUR\n– 58 13. 523,90\n– 18 607,03\n– 5 794 916,87\nPT\nExport refunds — Non-Annex I\n2009\nDeficiencies in the quality of the physical controls and in their reporting; failure to carry out seal and substitution controls\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 6 321,77\n0,00\n– 6 321,77\nPT\nExport refunds — other\n2009\nDeficiencies in the quality of the physical controls and in their reporting; failure to carry out seal and substitution controls\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 172 665,34\n0,00\n– 172 665,34\nPT\nExport refunds — Sugar and isoglucose\n2009\nDeficiencies in the quality of the physical controls and in their reporting; failure to carry out seal and substitution controls\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 89,64\n0,00\n– 89,64\nPT\nExport refunds — Non-Annex I\n2010\nDeficiencies in the quality of the physical controls and in their reporting; failure to carry out seal and substitution controls\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 14 305,09\n0,00\n– 14 305,09\nPT\nExport refunds — other\n2010\nDeficiencies in the quality of the physical controls and in their reporting; failure to carry out seal and substitution controls\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 240 513,8\n0,00\n– 240 513,8\nPT\nExport refunds — Sugar and isoglucose\n2010\nDeficiencies in the quality of the physical controls and in their reporting; failure to carry out seal and substitution controls\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 386,40\n0,00\n– 386,40\nPT\nExport refunds — Non-Annex I\n2011\nDeficiencies in the quality of the physical controls and in their reporting; failure to carry out seal and substitution controls\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 5 946,75\n0,00\n– 5 946,75\nPT\nExport refunds — other\n2011\nDeficiencies in the quality of the physical controls and in their reporting; failure to carry out seal and substitution controls\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 183 177,64\n0,00\n– 183 177,64\nPT\nOther Direct Aid — Ewe and Goats\n2007\nUnsatisfactory quality of the on-the-spot checks for CY 2006, 2007 and 2008; late start of on-the-spot checks for CY 2007 and 2008; payment of unidentified animals for CY 2006 and 2007\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 1 356 820,1\n– 41,59\n– 1 356 778,51\nPT\nOther Direct Aid — Ewe and Goats\n2008\nUnsatisfactory quality of the on-the-spot checks for CY 2006, 2007 and 2008; late start of on-the-spot checks for CY 2007 and 2008; payment of unidentified animals for CY 2006 and 2007\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 1 272 636,94\n0,00\n– 1 272 636,94\nPT\nOther Direct Aid — Ewe and Goats\n2009\nUnsatisfactory quality of the OTSC for CY 2006, 2007 and 2008; late start of OTSC for CY 2007 and 2008; payment of unidentified animals for CY 2006 and 2007\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 1 267 788,94\n0,00\n– 1 267 788,94\nPT\nOther Direct Aid — Ewe and Goats\n2010\nUnsatisfactory quality of the on-the-spot checks for CY 2006, 2007 and 2008; late start of on-the-spot checks for CY 2007 and 2008; payment of unidentified animals for CY 2006 and 2007\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 44,73\n0,00\n– 44,73\nPT\nOther Direct Aid — Ewe and Goats\n2011\nUnsatisfactory quality of the on-the-spot checks for CY 2006, 2007 and 2008; late start of on-the-spot checks for CY 2007 and 2008; payment of unidentified animals for CY 2006 and 2007\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 620,76\n0,00\n– 620,76\nPT\nCross Compliance\n2007\nSeveral GAEC not defined, lack of checks on SMR 1, 2, 5, 11 and lenient sanction system, farmers without animals, CY 2006\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 412 896,09\n– 13 715,18\n– 399 180,91\nPT\nCross Compliance\n2007\nSeveral GAEC not defined, lack of checks on SMR 1, 2, 5, 11, ineffective checks on 6-8, 16-18 and lenient sanction system, farmers with animals, CY 2006\nFLAT RATE\n10,00 %\nEUR\n– 2 466 398,82\n– 94 162,81\n– 2 372 236,01\nPT\nCross Compliance\n2008\nSeveral GAEC not defined, lack of checks on SMR 1, 2, 5, 11 and lenient sanction system, farmers without animals, CY 2007\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 811 952,21\n– 46 814,35\n– 765 137,86\nPT\nCross Compliance\n2008\nSeveral GAEC not defined, lack of checks on SMR 1, 2, 5, 11, ineffective checks on 6-8, 16-18 and lenient sanction system, farmers with animals, CY 2007\nFLAT RATE\n10,00 %\nEUR\n– 3 535 313,88\n– 208 399,51\n– 3 326 914,37\nPT\nCross Compliance\n2009\nSeveral GAEC not defined, lack of checks on SMR 1, 2, 5, 11 and lenient sanction system, CY 2008\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 2 978 076,83\n– 151 490,51\n– 2 826 586,32\nPT\nCross Compliance\n2010\nSeveral GAEC not defined, lack of checks on SMR 1, 2, 5, 11 and lenient sanction system, CY 2008\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 52 701,86\n– 6 051,95\n– 46 649,91\nTOTAL PT\nEUR\n– 14 778 657,59\n– 520 675,9\n– 14 257 981,69\nRO\nCross Compliance\n2008\nNon-definition and control of GAECs, non-definition of criteria for evaluation, CY 2007\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 634 324,17\n– 69 550,07\n– 564 774,1\nRO\nCross Compliance\n2009\nNon-definition and control of GAECs, non-definition of criteria for evaluation, CY 2008\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 1 579 209,93\n– 122 547,37\n– 1 456 662,56\nRO\nCross Compliance\n2009\nNon-definition and control of GAECs, non-definition of criteria for evaluation, CY 2007\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 7 557,46\n– 9 154,94\n1 597,48\nRO\nCross Compliance\n2010\nControls partially performed and sampling of parcels not risk based, CY 2009\nFLAT RATE\n2,00 %\nEUR\n189,50\n0,00\n189,50\nRO\nCross Compliance\n2010\nControls partially performed and sampling of parcels not risk based, CY 2009\nFLAT RATE\n2,00 %\nEUR\n– 4 023,09\n0,00\n– 4 023,09\nRO\nCross Compliance\n2010\nControls partially performed and sampling of parcels not risk based, CY 2009\nFLAT RATE\n2,00 %\nEUR\n– 1 226 850,84\n– 139,75\n– 1 226 711,09\nRO\nCross Compliance\n2010\nNon-definition and control of GAECs, non-definition of criteria for evaluation, CY 2008\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 10 898,89\n– 10 206,73\n– 692,16\nRO\nCross Compliance\n2010\nNon-definition and control of GAECs, non-definition of criteria for evaluation, CY 2007\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n2 764,61\n– 493,12\n3 257,73\nRO\nCross Compliance\n2011\nControls partially performed and sampling of parcels not risk based, CY 2009\nFLAT RATE\n2,00 %\nEUR\n1,35\n0,00\n1,35\nRO\nCross Compliance\n2011\nControls partially performed and sampling of parcels not risk based, CY 2009\nFLAT RATE\n2,00 %\nEUR\n– 250,64\n0,00\n– 250,64\nRO\nCross Compliance\n2011\nNon-definition and control of GAECs, non-definition of criteria for evaluation, CY 2008\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n4 873,62\n0,00\n4 873,62\nTOTAL RO\nEUR\n– 3 455 285,94\n– 212 091,98\n– 3 243 193,96\nSI\nCross Compliance\n2006\nLenient sanction system, 4 GAEC missing, CY 2005\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nSIT\n– 10 718 970,58\n– 414 437,68\n– 10 304 532,9\nSI\nCross Compliance\n2007\nLenient sanction system, 4 GAEC missing, CY 2005\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 147,83\n– 0,07\n– 147,76\nSI\nCross Compliance\n2007\nLenient sanction system, 4 GAEC missing, CY 2006\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 127 940,81\n– 935,76\n– 127 005,05\nSI\nCross Compliance\n2008\nLenient sanction system, 4 GAEC missing, CY 2005\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n0,05\n0,00\n0,05\nSI\nCross Compliance\n2008\nLenient sanction system, weakness for the control of 5 GAEC, CY 2007\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n535,78\n0,00\n535,78\nSI\nCross Compliance\n2008\nLenient sanction system, 4 GAEC missing, CY 2005\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 23,61\n0,00\n– 23,61\nSI\nCross Compliance\n2008\nLenient sanction system, 4 GAEC missing, CY 2006\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 393,36\n– 1,86\n– 391,50\nSI\nCross Compliance\n2008\nLenient sanction system, weakness for the control of 5 GAEC, CY 2007\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 279 213,39\n– 12 630,25\n– 266 583,14\nSI\nCross Compliance\n2009\nLenient sanction system, 4 GAEC missing, CY 2006\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n0,59\n0,00\n0,59\nSI\nCross Compliance\n2009\nLenient sanction system, weakness for the control of 5 GAEC, CY 2008\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n692,45\n0,00\n692,45\nSI\nCross Compliance\n2009\nLenient sanction system, weakness for the control of 5 GAEC, CY 2007\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n68,69\n0,00\n68,69\nSI\nCross Compliance\n2009\nLenient sanction system, weakness for the control of 5 GAEC, CY 2007\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 701,41\n– 28,05\n– 673,36\nSI\nCross Compliance\n2009\nLenient sanction system, 4 GAEC missing, CY 2006\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 44,03\n– 0,16\n– 43,87\nSI\nCross Compliance\n2009\nLenient sanction system, weakness for the control of 5 GAEC, CY 2008\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 350 086,56\n– 6 095,01\n– 343 991,55\nSI\nCross Compliance\n2010\nLenient sanction system, weakness for the control of 5 GAEC, CY 2007\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n19,55\n0,00\n19,55\nSI\nCross Compliance\n2010\nLenient sanction system, weakness for the control of 5 GAEC, CY 2008\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n30,66\n0,00\n30,66\nSI\nCross Compliance\n2010\nLenient sanction system, weakness for the control of 5 GAEC, CY 2009\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n958,47\n0,00\n958,47\nSI\nCross Compliance\n2010\nLenient sanction system, weakness for the control of 5 GAEC, CY 2007\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 2 761,46\n– 138,02\n– 2 623,44\nSI\nCross Compliance\n2010\nLenient sanction system, weakness for the control of 5 GAEC, CY 2008\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 607,46\n– 10,74\n– 596,72\nSI\nCross Compliance\n2010\nLenient sanction system, weakness for the control of 5 GAEC, CY 2009\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 413 940,7\n– 742,42\n– 413 198,28\nSI\nCross Compliance\n2011\nLenient sanction system, weakness for the control of 5 GAEC, CY 2008\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 35,31\n0,00\n– 35,31\nSI\nCross Compliance\n2011\nLenient sanction system, weakness for the control of 5 GAEC, CY 2008\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n2,85\n0,00\n2,85\nSI\nCross Compliance\n2011\nLenient sanction system, weakness for the control of 5 GAEC, CY 2009\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n4,89\n0,00\n4,89\nSI\nCross Compliance\n2011\nLenient sanction system, weakness for the control of 5 GAEC, CY 2009\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 569,66\n0,00\n– 569,66\nSI\nCross Compliance\n2012\nLenient sanction system, weakness for the control of 5 GAEC, CY 2009\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n27,06\n0,00\n27,06\nSI\nCross Compliance\n2012\nLenient sanction system, weakness for the control of 5 GAEC, CY 2009\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 195,93\n0,00\n– 195,93\nTOTAL SI\nSIT\n– 10 718 970,58\n– 414 437,68\n– 10 304 532,9\nTOTAL SI\nEUR\n– 1 174 320,48\n– 20 582,34\n– 1 153 738,14\nTOTAL 6701\nSIT\n– 10 718 970,58\n– 414 437,68\n– 10 304 532,9\nTOTAL 6701\nEUR\n– 295 142 609,32\n– 1 944 388,85\n– 293 198 220,47\nBUDGET ITEM: 6711\nDE\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 1+3 — Investment orientated measures (2007-2013)\n2008\nWeakness in project selection\nFLAT RATE\n10,00 %\nEUR\n– 239 484,15\n0,00\n– 239 484,15\nDE\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 1+3 — Investment orientated measures (2007-2013)\n2009\nWeakness in project selection\nFLAT RATE\n10,00 %\nEUR\n– 1 638 636,95\n0,00\n– 1 638 636,95\nDE\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 1+3 — Investment orientated measures (2007-2013)\n2010\nWeakness in project selection\nFLAT RATE\n10,00 %\nEUR\n– 781 262,31\n0,00\n– 781 262,31\nDE\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 1+3 — Investment orientated measures (2007-2013)\n2011\nWeakness in project selection\nFLAT RATE\n10,00 %\nEUR\n– 166 944,39\n0,00\n– 166 944,39\nTOTAL DE\nEUR\n– 2 826 327,8\n0,00\n– 2 826 327,8\nDK\nCross Compliance\n2009\n6 GAEC missing, no check on minimum requirements for plant protection products, CY 2008\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 126 902,55\n– 1 356,8\n– 125 545,75\nDK\nCross Compliance\n2010\nNo control on minimum requirements for plant protection products, CY 2009\nFLAT RATE\n2,00 %\nEUR\n– 30 431,43\n– 113,46\n– 30 317,97\nDK\nCross Compliance\n2010\n6 GAEC missing, no check on minimum requirements for plant protection products, CY 2008\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 2 492,68\n– 539,23\n– 1 953,45\nDK\nCross Compliance\n2010\nIncorrect calculation of sanctions, CY 2009\nONE-OFF\nEUR\n– 24,00\n– 0,08\n– 23,92\nDK\nCross Compliance\n2011\n6 GAEC missing, no check on minimum requirements for plant protection products, CY 2008\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 387,88\n0,00\n– 387,88\nDK\nCross Compliance\n2011\nNo sanction on minimum requirements for plant protection products, CY 2010\nONE-OFF\nEUR\n– 133,07\n0,00\n– 133,07\nTOTAL DK\nEUR\n– 160 371,61\n– 2 009,57\n– 158 362,04\nFI\nCross Compliance\n2007\n1 GAEC missing, lenient sanctioning system, CY 2007\nFLAT RATE\n2,00 %\nEUR\n– 401 890,24\n– 44,84\n– 401 845,4\nFI\nCross Compliance\n2008\n1 GAEC missing, lenient sanctioning system, CY 2008\nFLAT RATE\n2,00 %\nEUR\n– 406 777,26\n0,00\n– 406 777,26\nFI\nCross Compliance\n2008\n1 GAEC missing, lenient sanctioning system, CY 2007\nFLAT RATE\n2,00 %\nEUR\n– 13 442,43\n– 44,89\n– 13 397,54\nFI\nCross Compliance\n2009\n1 GAEC missing, lenient sanctioning system, CY 2008\nFLAT RATE\n2,00 %\nEUR\n– 16 504,68\n0,00\n– 16 504,68\nFI\nCross Compliance\n2009\n1 GAEC missing, lenient sanctioning system, CY 2007\nFLAT RATE\n2,00 %\nEUR\n123,81\n– 2,29\n126,10\nFI\nCross Compliance\n2010\n1 GAEC missing, lenient sanctioning system, CY 2008\nFLAT RATE\n2,00 %\nEUR\n124,79\n0,00\n124,79\nFI\nCross Compliance\n2010\n1 GAEC missing, lenient sanctioning system, CY 2007\nFLAT RATE\n2,00 %\nEUR\n53,00\n– 883,33\n936,33\nTOTAL FI\nEUR\n– 838 313,01\n– 975,35\n– 837 337,66\nFR\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 1 — Measures with flat rate support (2007-2013)\n2007\nNot enough control on the realisation of the steps and objectives of the business plan\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 177 862,92\n0,00\n– 177 862,92\nFR\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 1 — Measures with flat rate support (2007-2013)\n2008\nNot enough control on the realisation of the steps and objectives of the business plan\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 2 376 998,88\n0,00\n– 2 376 998,88\nFR\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 1 — Measures with flat rate support (2007-2013)\n2009\nNot enough control on the realisation of the steps and objectives of the business plan\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 2 527 224,82\n0,00\n– 2 527 224,82\nFR\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 1 — Measures with flat rate support (2007-2013)\n2010\nNot enough control on the realisation of the steps and objectives of the business plan\nEXTRAPOLATED\nEUR\n– 2 127 518,8\n0,00\n– 2 127 518,8\nFR\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 1 — Measures with flat rate support (2007-2013)\n2010\nNot enough control on the realisation of the steps and objectives of the business plan\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 2 541 264,35\n0,00\n– 2 541 264,35\nFR\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 1 — Measures with flat rate support (2007-2013)\n2011\nNot enough control on the realisation of the steps and objectives of the business plan\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 279 802,33\n0,00\n– 279 802,33\nTOTAL FR\nEUR\n– 10 030 672,1\n0,00\n– 10 030 672,1\nGB\nCross Compliance\n2007\nNon or incorrect application of regulatory sanctions, CY 2007\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 81 236,8\n0,00\n– 81 236,8\nGB\nCross Compliance\n2008\nNon or incorrect application of regulatory sanctions, CY 2008\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 40 221,1\n– 3 187,5\n– 37 033,6\nGB\nCross Compliance\n2008\nNon or incorrect application of regulatory sanctions, CY 2007\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 86 843,16\n– 3 162,8\n– 83 680,36\nGB\nCross Compliance\n2009\nNon or incorrect application of regulatory sanctions, CY 2009\nFLAT RATE\n2,00 %\nEUR\n– 12 481,44\n0,00\n– 12 481,44\nGB\nCross Compliance\n2009\nNon or incorrect application of regulatory sanctions, CY 2007\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 487,27\n– 25,57\n– 461,70\nGB\nCross Compliance\n2009\nNon or incorrect application of regulatory sanctions, CY 2008\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 51 617,56\n– 4 078,41\n– 47 539,15\nGB\nCross Compliance\n2010\nNon or incorrect application of regulatory sanctions, CY 2009\nFLAT RATE\n2,00 %\nEUR\n– 36 866,26\n– 2 314,12\n– 34 552,14\nGB\nCross Compliance\n2010\nNon or incorrect application of regulatory sanctions, CY 2008\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 3 266,99\n0,00\n– 3 266,99\nGB\nCross Compliance\n2010\nNon or incorrect application of regulatory sanctions, CY 2007\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 1 523,34\n– 83,53\n– 1 439,81\nGB\nCross Compliance\n2011\nNon or incorrect application of regulatory sanctions, CY 2009\nFLAT RATE\n2,00 %\nEUR\n– 396,43\n0,00\n– 396,43\nGB\nCross Compliance\n2011\nNon or incorrect application of regulatory sanctions, CY 2008\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 316,44\n0,00\n– 316,44\nGB\nCross Compliance\n2009\nIneffective control of GAEC and SMR 2, 4 and 8, CY 2009\nFLAT RATE\n2,00 %\nEUR\n– 1 554,44\n– 203,30\n– 1 351,14\nGB\nCross Compliance\n2009\nLenient sanctioning system for SMR 7 and 8, no follow-up of minor non-compliance, ineffective control of GAEC, CY 2008\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 90 650,32\n– 4 272,84\n– 86 377,48\nGB\nCross Compliance\n2010\nIneffective control of GAEC and SMR 2, 4 and 8, CY 2010\nFLAT RATE\n2,00 %\nEUR\n– 7 752,17\n– 7,24\n– 7 744,93\nGB\nCross Compliance\n2010\nIneffective control of GAEC and SMR 2, 4 and 8, CY 2009\nFLAT RATE\n2,00 %\nEUR\n– 88 716,38\n– 5 117,14\n– 83 599,24\nGB\nCross Compliance\n2010\nLenient sanctioning system for SMR 7 and 8, no follow-up of minor non-compliance, ineffective control of GAEC, CY 2008\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 9 809,49\n– 623,91\n– 9 185,58\nGB\nCross Compliance\n2011\nIneffective control of GAEC and SMR 2, 4 and 8, CY 2010\nFLAT RATE\n2,00 %\nEUR\n– 96 480,08\n– 2 386,95\n– 94 093,13\nGB\nCross Compliance\n2011\nIneffective control of GAEC and SMR 2, 4 and 8, CY 2009\nFLAT RATE\n2,00 %\nEUR\n– 17 490,4\n0,00\n– 17 490,4\nGB\nCross Compliance\n2011\nLenient sanctioning system for SMR 7 and 8, no follow-up of minor non-compliance, ineffective control of GAEC, CY 2008\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 1 447,33\n0,00\n– 1 447,33\nGB\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area related measures)\n2010\nLack of alternative control methods to visual check\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 272 613,55\n– 272 613,55\n0,00\nGB\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area related measures)\n2010\nIrregularities detected following the retroactive checks\nONE-OFF\nEUR\n– 22 801,38\n– 1 140,06\n– 21 661,32\nGB\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area related measures)\n2011\nLack of alternative control methods to visual check\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 546 873,59\n0,00\n– 546 873,59\nGB\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area related measures)\n2011\nLack of follow up for non-submission of payment claims for Natural Handicaps\nONE-OFF\nEUR\n– 25 763,75\n0,00\n– 25 763,75\nGB\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area related measures)\n2011\nIrregularities detected following the retroactive checks\nONE-OFF\nEUR\n– 24 094,7\n0,00\n– 24 094,7\nTOTAL GB\nEUR\n– 1 521 304,37\n– 299 216,92\n– 1 222 087,45\nIT\nAccreditation Paying Agency\n2010\ndeficiencies in the accreditation criteria for EAFRD\nFLAT RATE\n16,00 %\nEUR\n– 2 417 690,0\n0,00\n– 2 417 690,0\nIT\nAccreditation Paying Agency\n2010\ndeficiencies in the accreditation criteria for EAFRD (debtors)\nFLAT RATE\n16,00 %\nEUR\n– 7 132,0\n0,00\n– 7 132,0\nTOTAL IT\nEUR\n– 2 424 822,0\n0,00\n– 2 424 822,0\nPT\nCross Compliance\n2008\nSeveral GAEC not defined, lack of checks on SMR 1, 2, 5, 11 and lenient sanction system, CY 2008\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 232 548,55\n– 118 567,43\n– 113 981,12\nPT\nCross Compliance\n2008\nSeveral GAEC not defined, lack of checks on SMR 1, 2, 5, 11 and lenient sanction system, farmers without animals, CY 2007\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 352 561,76\n– 36 755,91\n– 315 805,85\nPT\nCross Compliance\n2008\nSeveral GAEC not defined, lack of checks on SMR 1, 2, 5, 11, ineffective checks on 6-8, 16-18 and lenient sanction system, farmers with animals, CY 2007\nFLAT RATE\n10,00 %\nEUR\n– 1 535 086,03\n– 163 623,07\n– 1 371 462,96\nPT\nCross Compliance\n2009\nSeveral GAEC not defined, lack of checks on SMR 1, 2, 5, 11 and lenient sanction system, CY 2008\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 391 551,37\n– 45 319,62\n– 346 231,75\nPT\nCross Compliance\n2010\nSeveral GAEC not defined, lack of checks on SMR 1, 2, 5, 11 and lenient sanction system, CY 2008\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 173 177,7\n– 18 879,59\n– 154 298,11\nTOTAL PT\nEUR\n– 2 684 925,41\n– 383 145,62\n– 2 301 779,79\nRO\nCross Compliance\n2009\nControls partially performed and sampling of parcels not risk based, CY 2009\nFLAT RATE\n2,00 %\nEUR\n– 3,15\n0,00\n– 3,15\nRO\nCross Compliance\n2009\nNon-definition and control of GAECs, non-definition of criteria for evaluation, CY 2008\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 551 739,74\n– 55 909,89\n– 495 829,85\nRO\nCross Compliance\n2009\nNon-definition and control of GAECs, non-definition of criteria for evaluation, CY 2007\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 52 672,92\n0,00\n– 52 672,92\nRO\nCross Compliance\n2010\nControls partially performed and sampling of parcels not risk based, CY 2009\nFLAT RATE\n2,00 %\nEUR\n– 457 003,1\n0,00\n– 457 003,1\nRO\nCross Compliance\n2010\nNon-definition and control of GAECs, non-definition of criteria for evaluation, CY 2008\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 1 497,6\n0,00\n– 1 497,6\nRO\nCross Compliance\n2010\nNon-definition and control of GAECs, non-definition of criteria for evaluation, CY 2007\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n2 259,28\n0,00\n2 259,28\nRO\nCross Compliance\n2011\nControls partially performed and sampling of parcels not risk based, CY 2009\nFLAT RATE\n2,00 %\nEUR\n– 2 595,48\n0,00\n– 2 595,48\nRO\nCross Compliance\n2011\nNon-definition and control of GAECs, non-definition of criteria for evaluation, CY 2008\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n7 412,84\n0,00\n7 412,84\nTOTAL RO\nEUR\n– 1 055 839,87\n– 55 909,89\n– 999 929,98\nSI\nCross Compliance\n2008\nLenient sanction system, weakness for the control of 5 GAEC, CY 2007\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 318 962,73\n– 6 726,62\n– 312 236,11\nSI\nCross Compliance\n2009\nLenient sanction system, weakness for the control of 5 GAEC, CY 2009\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 217,53\n0,00\n– 217,53\nSI\nCross Compliance\n2009\nLenient sanction system, weakness for the control of 5 GAEC, CY 2008\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 317 428,64\n– 8 275,35\n– 309 153,29\nSI\nCross Compliance\n2009\nLenient sanction system, weakness for the control of 5 GAEC, CY 2007\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n66,00\n0,00\n66,00\nSI\nCross Compliance\n2010\nLenient sanction system, weakness for the control of 5 GAEC, CY 2009\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 315 177,28\n– 1 172,19\n– 314 005,09\nSI\nCross Compliance\n2010\nLenient sanction system, weakness for the control of 5 GAEC, CY 2007\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n523,44\n0,00\n523,44\nSI\nCross Compliance\n2010\nLenient sanction system, weakness for the control of 5 GAEC, CY 2008\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 385,03\n0,00\n– 385,03\nSI\nCross Compliance\n2011\nLenient sanction system, weakness for the control of 5 GAEC, CY 2009\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 90,49\n0,00\n– 90,49\nSI\nCross Compliance\n2011\nLenient sanction system, weakness for the control of 5 GAEC, CY 2008\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 162,59\n0,00\n– 162,59\nSI\nCross Compliance\n2012\nLenient sanction system, weakness for the control of 5 GAEC, CY 2009\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 70,06\n0,00\n– 70,06\nTOTAL SI\nEUR\n– 951 904,91\n– 16 174,16\n– 935 730,75\nTOTAL 6711\nEUR\n– 22 494 481,08\n– 757 431,51\n– 21 737 049,57",
  "extent": "E+W+S+N.I.",
  "status": null,
  "version": "current",
  "annotations": [],
  "outstanding_effects": [],
  "provenance": {
    "source": "legislation.gov.uk",
    "source_url": "https://www.legislation.gov.uk/eudn/2014/191/annex",
    "retrieved_at": "2026-11-01T15:14:49.391220+00:00"
  },
  "licence": "Open Government Licence v3.0",
  "licence_url": "https://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/version/3/",
  "attribution": "Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Source: legislation.gov.uk, The National Archives."
}