OpenLegislation

Division (b) Award criteria

United Kingdom

Original text. Later amendments are not shown.

The merit of all eligible proposals will be evaluated and scored according to the following award criteria and scoring system:

A project proposal has to reach at least the minimum pass score for each award criterion and also the sum of scores for criteria for which a minimum score has been fixed has to be equivalent to 55 points or more.

Award criteriaMinimum pass scoref1 Maximum score

1.

Technical coherence and quality

3060

2.

Financial coherence and quality

2040
Overall (pass) scores 55 100
  • Technical coherence and quality

    The clarity, coherence and feasibility of the proposal will be evaluated in view of the project objectives and its expected results. The nature and the scope of the future IP will be taken into account.

  • Financial coherence and quality

    The proposed budget and its consistency with the actions proposed and with the applicable rules as well as the cost-effectiveness of the proposed approach will be evaluated. The value for money of the proposal will also be assessed.

Annotations

Footnotes

f1

A project proposal has to reach at least the minimum pass score for each award criterion and also the sum of scores for criteria for which a minimum score has been fixed has to be equivalent to 55 points or more.

Notes on Division 5

Footnotes

f1

The meaning of the term ‘selection’ in Article 24(2)(d) of the LIFE Regulation includes the meaning of the term ‘eligibility’ in Article 19 LIFE Regulation and Article 131 of the Financial Regulation.

Notes on Division 5.1

Footnotes

f1

Commission Notice No 2013/C-205/05 (OJ C 205, 19.7.2013, p. 9).