Division (b) Award criteria
United Kingdom
-
Technical coherence and quality in capacity building projects refers to the proposed interventions in order to develop the Member State’s capacity to submit successful applications for funding for projects under the sub-programmes for Environment and Climate Action.
The merit of all eligible proposals will be evaluated and scored according to the following award criteria and scoring system:
| A project proposal has to reach at least the minimum pass score for each award criterion and also the sum of scores for criteria for which a minimum score has been fixed has to be equivalent to 55 points or more. | ||
| Award criteria | Minimum pass scoref1 | Maximum score |
|---|---|---|
| Technical coherence and quality | 15 | 30 |
| Financial coherence and quality | 10 | 20 |
| Comprehensiveness of the approach in relation to the identified weaknesses leading to the Member State’s low participation in LIFE+ 2010-2012 programmes | 15 | 30 |
| Presentation of the expected improvement of the ability to promote integration, complementarity, synergies and replicability of the Life Programme into policies, economic activities and other programmes | 10 | 20 |
| Overall (pass) scores | 55 | 100 |
Annotations
Footnotes
- f1
-
A project proposal has to reach at least the minimum pass score for each award criterion and also the sum of scores for criteria for which a minimum score has been fixed has to be equivalent to 55 points or more.
Notes on Division 5
Footnotes
- f1
-
The meaning of the term ‘selection’ in Article 24(2)(d) of the LIFE Regulation includes the meaning of the term ‘eligibility’ in Article 19 LIFE Regulation and Article 131 of the Financial Regulation.
Notes on Division 5.1
Footnotes
- f1
-
Commission Notice No 2013/C-205/05 (OJ C 205, 19.7.2013, p. 9).