{
  "url": "https://openlegislation.uk/eu-decision-2014-458/annex",
  "json_url": "https://openlegislation.uk/eu-decision-2014-458/annex.json",
  "legislation": "eudn/2014/458",
  "legislation_title": "Commission Implementing Decision of 9 July 2014 on excluding from European Union financing certain expenditure incurred by the Member States under the Guarantee Section of the European Agricultural Guidance and Guarantee Fund (EAGGF), under the European Agricultural Guarantee Fund (EAGF) and under the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) (notified under document C(2014) 4479) (only the Czech, Danish, Dutch, English, Finnish, French, German, Hungarian, Italian, Latvian, Polish, Portuguese, Slovenian, Spanish and Swedish texts are authentic) (2014/458/EU)",
  "legislation_url": "https://openlegislation.uk/eu-decision-2014-458",
  "path": "annex",
  "kind": "annex",
  "number": null,
  "heading": null,
  "text": "MS\nMeasure\nFinancial Year\nReason\nType\n%\nCurrency\nAmount\nDeductions\nFinancial impact\nBUDGET ITEM: 6701\nBE\nOther Direct Aid — Bovines\n2010\nPayments for ineligible animals and incorrect application of sanctions\nONE– OFF\nEUR\n– 133 335,0\n0,00\n– 133 335,0\nBE\nOther Direct Aid — Bovines\n2011\nPayments for ineligible animals and incorrect application of sanctions\nONE– OFF\nEUR\n– 62 275,0\n0,00\n– 62 275,0\nBE\nOther Direct Aid — Bovines\n2012\nPayments for ineligible animals and incorrect application of sanctions\nONE– OFF\nEUR\n– 110 550,0\n0,00\n– 110 550,0\nTOTAL BE\nEUR\n– 306 160,0\n0,00\n– 306 160,0\nCZ\nOther Direct Aid — Article 68– 72 of Reg 73/2009\n2011\nUndue payments and non– application of reductions/exclusions for animals with irregularities\nONE– OFF\nEUR\n– 4 195,16\n0,00\n– 4 195,16\nCZ\nOther Direct Aid — Article 68– 72 of Reg 73/2009\n2012\nUndue payments and non– application of reductions/exclusions for animals with irregularities\nONE– OFF\nEUR\n– 68,74\n0,00\n– 68,74\nTOTAL CZ\nEUR\n– 4 263,9\n0,00\n– 4 263,9\nDE\nDecoupled Direct Aids\n2008\nlack of extrapolation in case of overdeclaration below 3 %\nONE– OFF\nEUR\n– 106 694,14\n0,00\n– 106 694,14\nDE\nDecoupled Direct Aids\n2009\nlack of extrapolation in case of overdeclaration below 3 %\nONE– OFF\nEUR\n– 104 776,14\n0,00\n– 104 776,14\nDE\nDecoupled Direct Aids\n2009\ndeficiencies in the measurement tolerance\nONE– OFF\nEUR\n– 56 327,48\n0,00\n– 56 327,48\nDE\nDecoupled Direct Aids\n2010\nlack of extrapolation in case of overdeclaration below 3 %\nONE– OFF\nEUR\n– 72 254,33\n0,00\n– 72 254,33\nDE\nDecoupled Direct Aids\n2010\ndeficiencies in the measurement tolerance\nONE– OFF\nEUR\n– 56 781,05\n0,00\n– 56 781,05\nTOTAL DE\nEUR\n– 396 833,14\n0,00\n– 396 833,14\nDK\nDecoupled Direct Aids\n2011\nOn– the– spot check weaknesses\nFLAT RATE\n2,00 %\nEUR\n– 1 529 693,1\n0,00\n– 1 529 693,1\nDK\nDecoupled Direct Aids\n2011\nRetroactive recoveries and incorrect treatment of payment entitlements\nONE– OFF\nEUR\n– 69 494,0\n0,00\n– 69 494,0\nDK\nDecoupled Direct Aids\n2012\nOn– the– spot check weaknesses\nFLAT RATE\n2,00 %\nEUR\n– 1 489 167,2\n0,00\n– 1 489 167,2\nDK\nDecoupled Direct Aids\n2012\nRetroactive recoveries and incorrect treatment of payment entitlements\nONE– OFF\nEUR\n– 3 654,0\n0,00\n– 3 654,0\nTOTAL DK\nEUR\n– 3 092 008,3\n0,00\n– 3 092 008,3\nES\nFishery Measures\n2004\nNot conclusive administrative controls, deficiencies in on– the– spot controls and external audit\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 185 468,74\n0,00\n– 185 468,74\nES\nFishery Measures\n2005\nNot conclusive administrative controls, deficiencies in on– the– spot controls and external audit\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 253 547,34\n0,00\n– 253 547,34\nES\nFishery Measures\n2006\nNot conclusive administrative controls, deficiencies in on– the– spot controls and external audit\nFLAT RATE\n2,00 %\nEUR\n– 117 708,85\n0,00\n– 117 708,85\nES\nDecoupled Direct Aids\n2010\nWeaknesses in the administrative controls, on– the– spot checks and recoveries\nONE– OFF\nEUR\n– 53 541,4\n0,00\n– 53 541,4\nES\nDecoupled Direct Aids\n2011\nWeaknesses in the administrative controls, on– the– spot checks and recoveries\nONE– OFF\nEUR\n– 368,20\n0,00\n– 368,20\nES\nCross Compliance\n2009\nLeniency of the sanctioning system, CY2008\nONE– OFF\nEUR\n– 191 873,53\n– 383,75\n– 191 489,78\nES\nCross Compliance\n2009\nPartial and ineffective check of many SMRs, CY2008\nFLAT RATE\n2,00 %\nEUR\n– 790 454,36\n– 218,52\n– 790 235,84\nES\nCross Compliance\n2009\nPartial and ineffective check of many SMRs, CY2010\nFLAT RATE\n2,00 %\nEUR\n– 24 049,41\n0,00\n– 24 049,41\nES\nCross Compliance\n2010\nPartial and ineffective check of many SMRs, CY2008\nFLAT RATE\n2,00 %\nEUR\n– 638,55\n0,00\n– 638,55\nES\nCross Compliance\n2010\nPartial and ineffective check of many SMRs, CY2009\nFLAT RATE\n2,00 %\nEUR\n– 781 951,76\n– 1 002,96\n– 780 948,8\nES\nCross Compliance\n2010\nPartial and ineffective check of many SMRs, CY2010\nFLAT RATE\n2,00 %\nEUR\n– 30,92\n0,00\n– 30,92\nES\nCross Compliance\n2011\nPartial and ineffective check of many SMRs, CY2008\nFLAT RATE\n2,00 %\nEUR\n– 117,27\n0,00\n– 117,27\nES\nCross Compliance\n2011\nPartial and ineffective check of many SMRs, CY2009\nFLAT RATE\n2,00 %\nEUR\n– 570,44\n0,00\n– 570,44\nES\nCross Compliance\n2011\nPartial and ineffective check of many SMRs, CY2010\nFLAT RATE\n2,00 %\nEUR\n– 824 194,02\n0,00\n– 824 194,02\nTOTAL ES\nEUR\n– 3 224 514,79\n– 1 605,23\n– 3 222 909,56\nFI\nDecoupled Direct Aids\n2010\nWeaknesses in LPIS, on– the– spot checks and calculation of reductions\nONE– OFF\nEUR\n– 289 992,1\n0,00\n– 289 992,1\nFI\nDecoupled Direct Aids\n2011\nWeaknesses in LPIS, on– the– spot checks and calculation of reductions\nONE– OFF\nEUR\n– 961 208,71\n0,00\n– 961 208,71\nFI\nDecoupled Direct Aids\n2012\nWeaknesses in LPIS, on– the– spot checks and calculation of reductions\nONE– OFF\nEUR\n– 1 384 610,18\n0,00\n– 1 384 610,18\nTOTAL FI\nEUR\n– 2 635 810,99\n0,00\n– 2 635 810,99\nFR\nMilk — Schoolmilk\n2009\nlate on– the– spot control for School milk scheme (school year 2008– 2009)\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 290 282,58\n0,00\n– 290 282,58\nFR\nMilk — Schoolmilk\n2010\nlate on– the– spot control for School milk scheme (school year 2008– 2009)\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 351 047,94\n0,00\n– 351 047,94\nFR\nMilk — Schoolmilk\n2011\nlate on– the– spot control for School milk scheme (school year 2008– 2009)\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 1 610,58\n0,00\n– 1 610,58\nFR\nMilk — Schoolmilk\n2012\nlate on– the– spot control for School milk scheme (school year 2008– 2009)\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 474,30\n0,00\n– 474,30\nFR\nEntitlements\n2010\nirregular allocations of the national reserve and consolidation of the forage areas\nFLAT RATE\n10,00 %\nEUR\n– 5 938 076,49\n0,00\n– 5 938 076,49\nFR\nEntitlements\n2010\nirregular allocations of the national reserve and consolidation of the forage areas\nONE– OFF\nEUR\n– 2 584 040,4\n0,00\n– 2 584 040,4\nFR\nEntitlements\n2011\nirregular allocations of the national reserve and consolidation of the forage areas\nFLAT RATE\n10,00 %\nEUR\n– 3 176 345,75\n0,00\n– 3 176 345,75\nFR\nEntitlements\n2011\nirregular allocations of the national reserve and consolidation of the forage areas\nONE– OFF\nEUR\n– 2 584 032,47\n0,00\n– 2 584 032,47\nFR\nEntitlements\n2012\nirregular allocations of the national reserve and consolidation of the forage areas\nFLAT RATE\n10,00 %\nEUR\n– 3 176 345,75\n0,00\n– 3 176 345,75\nFR\nEntitlements\n2012\nirregular allocations of the national reserve and consolidation of the forage areas\nONE– OFF\nEUR\n– 2 584 031,62\n0,00\n– 2 584 031,62\nTOTAL FR\nEUR\n– 20 686 287,88\n0,00\n– 20 686 287,88\nGB\nDecoupled Direct Aids\n2011\nWeaknesses in LPIS and on– the– spot checks\nONE– OFF\nEUR\n– 2 563 473,0\n0,00\n– 2 563 473,0\nTOTAL GB\nEUR\n– 2 563 473,0\n0,00\n– 2 563 473,0\nIT\nFruit and Vegetables — Tomato Processing\n2008\nWeaknesses in administrative and accounting checks; No reconciling records held by producer organisations and processors with the accounts required under national law\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 2 332 156,3\n– 932 862,52\n– 1 399 293,78\nIT\nFruit and Vegetables — Tomato Processing\n2010\nWeaknesses in administrative and accounting checks; No reconciling records held by producer organisations and processors with the accounts required under national law\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n720,02\n0,00\n720,02\nIT\nIrregularities\n2012\nLack of information on the undertaken recovery actions\nONE– OFF\nEUR\n– 2 362 005,73\n0,00\n– 2 362 005,73\nIT\nIrregularities\n2012\nNegligence in the recovery procedure\nONE– OFF\nEUR\n– 1 283 164,95\n0,00\n– 1 283 164,95\nIT\nIrregularities\n2012\nNon– reporting in Annex III\nONE– OFF\nEUR\n– 1 460 976,88\n0,00\n– 1 460 976,88\nTOTAL IT\nEUR\n– 7 437 583,84\n– 932 862,52\n– 6 504 721,32\nLV\nDecoupled Direct Aids\n2011\nWeaknesses following the obvious errors and in the on– the– spot checks with errors below 3 %\nONE– OFF\nEUR\n– 15 324,3\n0,00\n– 15 324,3\nLV\nDecoupled Direct Aids\n2012\nWeaknesses following the obvious errors and in the on– the– spot checks with errors below 3 %\nONE– OFF\nEUR\n– 3 399,21\n0,00\n– 3 399,21\nLV\nCross Compliance\n2009\n4 GAEC not defined, incorrect calculation of sanction, CY 2008\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 254 163,51\n0,00\n– 254 163,51\nLV\nCross Compliance\n2010\n2 GAEC not defined, deficiencies in checks for SMR4 and tolerance applied for SMR7, CY 2009\nFLAT RATE\n2,00 %\nEUR\n– 181 777,79\n0,00\n– 181 777,79\nLV\nCross Compliance\n2010\n4 GAEC not defined, incorrect calculation of sanction, CY 2008\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 179,81\n0,00\n– 179,81\nLV\nCross Compliance\n2011\n2 GAEC not defined, deficiencies in checks for SMR4 and tolerance applied for SMR7, CY 2009\nFLAT RATE\n2,00 %\nEUR\n– 100,05\n0,00\n– 100,05\nLV\nCross Compliance\n2011\n4 GAEC not defined, incorrect calculation of sanction, CY 2008\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n14,86\n0,00\n14,86\nLV\nCross Compliance\n2011\nDeficiencies in checks for SMR4 and tolerance applied for SMR7, CY 2010\nONE– OFF\nEUR\n– 2 230,28\n0,00\n– 2 230,28\nLV\nCross Compliance\n2012\n2 GAEC not defined, deficiencies in checks for SMR4 and tolerance applied for SMR7, CY 2009\nFLAT RATE\n2,00 %\nEUR\n– 0,19\n0,00\n– 0,19\nTOTAL LV\nEUR\n– 457 160,28\n0,00\n– 457 160,28\nSE\nDecoupled Direct Aids\n2010\nWeaknesses in LPIS, CY 2009\nONE– OFF\nEUR\n– 1 117 986,6\n0,00\n– 1 117 986,6\nSE\nDecoupled Direct Aids\n2011\nWeaknesses in LPIS, CY 2010\nONE– OFF\nEUR\n– 15 591,0\n0,00\n– 15 591,0\nTOTAL SE\nEUR\n– 1 133 577,6\n0,00\n– 1 133 577,6\nSI\nDecoupled Direct Aids\n2010\nWeakness in verification of small parcels to respect the definition of agricultural parcels\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 85 780,08\n– 2 203,29\n– 83 576,79\nSI\nDecoupled Direct Aids\n2010\nNon– extrapolation of control result in case of difference below 3 %\nONE– OFF\nEUR\n– 1 771,9\n– 10,97\n– 1 760,93\nSI\nDecoupled Direct Aids\n2011\nWeakness in verification of small parcels to respect the definition of agricultural parcels\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 115 956,46\n0,00\n– 115 956,46\nSI\nDecoupled Direct Aids\n2011\nNon– extrapolation of control result in case of difference below 3 %\nONE– OFF\nEUR\n– 6 376,67\n– 7,62\n– 6 369,05\nSI\nDecoupled Direct Aids\n2012\nWeakness in verification of small parcels to respect the definition of agricultural parcels\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 131 269,23\n0,00\n– 131 269,23\nSI\nDecoupled Direct Aids\n2012\nNon– extrapolation of control result in case of difference below 3 %\nONE– OFF\nEUR\n– 6 506,76\n– 7,78\n– 6 498,98\nTOTAL SI\nEUR\n– 347 661,1\n– 2 229,66\n– 345 431,44\nTOTAL 6701\nEUR\n– 42 285 334,82\n– 936 697,41\n– 41 348 637,41\nBUDGET ITEM: 6711\nDK\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007– 2013, area related measures)\n2011\nOn– the– spot check weaknesses\nFLAT RATE\n2,00 %\nEUR\n– 138 216,28\n0,00\n– 138 216,28\nDK\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007– 2013, area related measures)\n2012\nOn– the– spot check weaknesses\nFLAT RATE\n2,00 %\nEUR\n– 114 814,02\n0,00\n– 114 814,02\nTOTAL DK\nEUR\n– 253 030,3\n0,00\n– 253 030,3\nES\nCross Compliance\n2009\nPartial and ineffective check of many SMRs, CY2008\nFLAT RATE\n2,00 %\nEUR\n– 25 382,59\n0,00\n– 25 382,59\nES\nCross Compliance\n2009\nPartial and ineffective check of many SMRs, CY2009\nFLAT RATE\n2,00 %\nEUR\n– 1 341,72\n0,00\n– 1 341,72\nES\nCross Compliance\n2010\nPartial and ineffective check of many SMRs, CY2008\nFLAT RATE\n2,00 %\nEUR\n18,14\n0,00\n18,14\nES\nCross Compliance\n2010\nPartial and ineffective check of many SMRs, CY2009\nFLAT RATE\n2,00 %\nEUR\n– 34 511,04\n0,00\n– 34 511,04\nES\nCross Compliance\n2010\nPartial and ineffective check of many SMRs, CY2010\nFLAT RATE\n2,00 %\nEUR\n– 317,20\n0,00\n– 317,20\nES\nCross Compliance\n2011\nPartial and ineffective check of many SMRs, CY2008\nFLAT RATE\n2,00 %\nEUR\n– 36,65\n0,00\n– 36,65\nES\nCross Compliance\n2011\nPartial and ineffective check of many SMRs, CY2009\nFLAT RATE\n2,00 %\nEUR\n– 69,84\n0,00\n– 69,84\nES\nCross Compliance\n2011\nPartial and ineffective check of many SMRs, CY2010\nFLAT RATE\n2,00 %\nEUR\n– 39 292,14\n0,00\n– 39 292,14\nTOTAL ES\nEUR\n– 100 933,04\n0,00\n– 100 933,04\nFI\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007– 2013, area related measures)\n2010\nWeaknesses in LPIS, on– the– spot checks and calculation of reductions\nONE– OFF\nEUR\n– 132 350,41\n0,00\n– 132 350,41\nFI\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007– 2013, area related measures)\n2011\nWeaknesses in LPIS, on– the– spot checks and calculation of reductions\nONE– OFF\nEUR\n– 449 325,95\n0,00\n– 449 325,95\nFI\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007– 2013, area related measures)\n2012\nWeaknesses in LPIS, on– the– spot checks and calculation of reductions\nONE– OFF\nEUR\n– 558 189,31\n0,00\n– 558 189,31\nTOTAL FI\nEUR\n– 1 139 865,67\n0,00\n– 1 139 865,67\nGB\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007– 2013, area related measures)\n2011\nWeaknesses in LPIS and on– the– spot checks\nONE– OFF\nEUR\n– 614 769,0\n0,00\n– 614 769,0\nTOTAL GB\nEUR\n– 614 769,0\n0,00\n– 614 769,0\nHU\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 1+3 — Investment orientated measures (2007– 2013)\n2009\ninadequate key control — support paid to ineligible beneficiaries (compulsory training not attended)\nFLAT RATE\n10,00 %\nEUR\n– 131 333,83\n0,00\n– 131 333,83\nHU\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 1+3 — Investment orientated measures (2007– 2013)\n2010\ninadequate key control — support paid to ineligible beneficiaries (compulsory training not attended)\nFLAT RATE\n10,00 %\nEUR\n– 149 391,75\n0,00\n– 149 391,75\nHU\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 1+3 — Investment orientated measures (2007– 2013)\n2011\ninadequate key control — support paid to ineligible beneficiaries (compulsory training not attended)\nFLAT RATE\n10,00 %\nEUR\n– 42 101,65\n0,00\n– 42 101,65\nHU\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 1+3 — Investment orientated measures (2007– 2013)\n2012\ninadequate key control — support paid to ineligible beneficiaries (compulsory training not attended)\nFLAT RATE\n10,00 %\nEUR\n– 60 885,25\n0,00\n– 60 885,25\nTOTAL HU\nEUR\n– 383 712,48\n0,00\n– 383 712,48\nLV\nCross Compliance\n2009\n4 GAEC not defined, incorrect calculation of sanction, CY 2008\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 212 566,45\n0,00\n– 212 566,45\nLV\nCross Compliance\n2010\n2 GAEC not defined, deficiencies in checks for SMR4 and tolerance applied for SMR7, CY 2009\nFLAT RATE\n2,00 %\nEUR\n– 92 731,87\n0,00\n– 92 731,87\nLV\nCross Compliance\n2010\n4 GAEC not defined, incorrect calculation of sanction, CY 2008\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n1 146,35\n0,00\n1 146,35\nLV\nCross Compliance\n2011\n2 GAEC not defined, deficiencies in checks for SMR4 and tolerance applied for SMR7, CY 2009\nFLAT RATE\n2,00 %\nEUR\n249,48\n0,00\n249,48\nLV\nCross Compliance\n2011\n4 GAEC not defined, incorrect calculation of sanction, CY 2008\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n425,78\n0,00\n425,78\nLV\nCross Compliance\n2012\n2 GAEC not defined, deficiencies in checks for SMR4 and tolerance applied for SMR7, CY 2009\nFLAT RATE\n2,00 %\nEUR\n106,22\n0,00\n106,22\nLV\nCross Compliance\n2012\n4 GAEC not defined, incorrect calculation of sanction, CY 2008\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n183,03\n0,00\n183,03\nTOTAL LV\nEUR\n– 303 187,46\n0,00\n– 303 187,46\nPL\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 1+3 — Investment orientated measures (2007– 2013)\n2009\nLack of selection criteria\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 16 237,92\n0,00\n– 16 237,92\nPL\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 1+3 — Investment orientated measures (2007– 2013)\n2010\nLack of selection criteria\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 2 189 601,12\n0,00\n– 2 189 601,12\nPL\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 1+3 — Investment orientated measures (2007– 2013)\n2011\nLack of selection criteria\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 2 290 180,19\n0,00\n– 2 290 180,19\nPL\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 1+3 — Investment orientated measures (2007– 2013)\n2012\nLack of selection criteria\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 1 175 231,69\n0,00\n– 1 175 231,69\nPL\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 1+3 — Investment orientated measures (2007– 2013)\n2013\nLack of selection criteria\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 172 311,4\n0,00\n– 172 311,4\nTOTAL PL\nEUR\n– 5 843 562,32\n0,00\n– 5 843 562,32\nPT\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007– 2013, area related measures)\n2008\nlate on– the– spot checks\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 81 992,88\n– 81 992,88\n0,00\nPT\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007– 2013, area related measures)\n2009\nlate on– the– spot checks\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 3 374 908,49\n– 2 911 944,67\n– 462 963,82\nPT\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007– 2013, area related measures)\n2009\nlate on– the– spot checks\nFLAT RATE\n2,00 %\nEUR\n– 353 974,42\n0,00\n– 353 974,42\nPT\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007– 2013, area related measures)\n2010\nlate on– the– spot checks\nFLAT RATE\n2,00 %\nEUR\n– 213 427,37\n0,00\n– 213 427,37\nPT\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007– 2013, area related measures)\n2010\nlate on– the– spot checks\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 1 682 133,84\n– 1 446 076,06\n– 236 057,78\nTOTAL PT\nEUR\n– 5 706 437,0\n– 4 440 013,61\n– 1 266 423,39\nSE\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007– 2013, area related measures)\n2010\nWeaknesses in LPIS, CY 2009\nONE– OFF\nEUR\n– 190 380,0\n0,00\n– 190 380,0\nSE\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007– 2013, area related measures)\n2011\nWeaknesses in LPIS, CY 2010\nONE– OFF\nEUR\n– 143 719,0\n0,00\n– 143 719,0\nTOTAL SE\nEUR\n– 334 099,0\n0,00\n– 334 099,0\nTOTAL 6711\nEUR\n– 14 679 596,27\n– 4 440 013,61\n– 10 239 582,66",
  "extent": "E+W+S+N.I.",
  "status": null,
  "version": "current",
  "annotations": [],
  "outstanding_effects": [],
  "provenance": {
    "source": "legislation.gov.uk",
    "source_url": "https://www.legislation.gov.uk/eudn/2014/458/annex",
    "retrieved_at": "2026-11-01T15:14:42.771881+00:00"
  },
  "licence": "Open Government Licence v3.0",
  "licence_url": "https://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/version/3/",
  "attribution": "Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Source: legislation.gov.uk, The National Archives."
}