Division Budget Item: 6701
United Kingdom
| MS | Measure | FY | Reason | Type | Correction % | Currency | Amount | Deductions | Financial Impact |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AT | Entitlements | 2011 | Consolidation of alpine pasture and multiple annual instalments | ONE-OFF | 0,00 % | EUR | – 276 374,35 | 0,00 | – 276 374,35 |
| Entitlements | 2012 | Consolidation of alpine pasture and multiple annual instalments | ONE-OFF | 0,00 % | EUR | – 293 850,15 | 0,00 | – 293 850,15 | |
| Entitlements | 2013 | Consolidation of alpine pasture and multiple annual instalments | ONE-OFF | 0,00 % | EUR | – 301 013,79 | 0,00 | – 301 013,79 | |
| AT | Cross Compliance | 2012 | Deficiencies in sanctions for SMR7 and leniency in sanctioning for GAECs, CY 2011 | ONE-OFF | 0,00 % | EUR | – 76 849,71 | 0,00 | – 76 849,71 |
| Cross Compliance | 2010 | GAEC on landscape features not effectively controlled, CY 2009 | FLAT RATE | 5,00 % | EUR | – 13 484,4 | 0,00 | – 13 484,4 | |
| Cross Compliance | 2011 | GAEC on landscape features not effectively controlled, CY 2010 | FLAT RATE | 5,00 % | EUR | – 14 441,58 | 0,00 | – 14 441,58 | |
| Cross Compliance | 2012 | GAEC on landscape features not effectively controlled, CY 2011 | FLAT RATE | 5,00 % | EUR | – 14 393,7 | 0,00 | – 14 393,7 | |
| Cross Compliance | 2010 | No systematic follow-up of minor non-compliances, CY 2009 | FLAT RATE | 2,00 % | EUR | – 5,14 | 0,00 | – 5,14 | |
| Cross Compliance | 2011 | No systematic follow-up of minor non-compliances, CY 2010 | FLAT RATE | 2,00 % | EUR | – 246,74 | 0,00 | – 246,74 | |
| Cross Compliance | 2012 | No systematic follow-up of minor non-compliances, CY 2011 | FLAT RATE | 2,00 % | EUR | – 755,78 | 0,00 | – 755,78 | |
| Cross Compliance | 2010 | Weakness in cross-reporting, deficiencies in sanctions for SMR7 and leniency in sanctioning for GAECs, CY 2009 | ONE-OFF | 0,00 % | EUR | – 47 399,01 | 0,00 | – 47 399,01 | |
| Cross Compliance | 2011 | Weakness in cross-reporting, deficiencies in sanctions for SMR7 and leniency in sanctioning for GAECs, CY 2010 | ONE-OFF | 0,00 % | EUR | – 91 372,17 | 0,00 | – 91 372,17 | |
| Total AT: | EUR | – 1 130 186,52 | 0,00 | – 1 130 186,52 | |||||
| MS | Measure | FY | Reason | Type | Correction % | Currency | Amount | Deductions | Financial Impact |
| BE | Cross Compliance | 2008 | Weaknesses in SMR 7, 11, 16-18, tolerance applied and sampling used for land checks, CY2007 | FLAT RATE | 5,00 % | EUR | – 3 389,17 | 0,00 | – 3 389,17 |
| Cross Compliance | 2009 | Weaknesses in SMR 7, 11, 16-18, tolerance applied and sampling used for land checks, CY2007 | FLAT RATE | 5,00 % | EUR | – 1 856,51 | 0,00 | – 1 856,51 | |
| Cross Compliance | 2010 | Weaknesses in SMR 7, 11, 16-18, tolerance applied and sampling used for land checks, CY2007 | FLAT RATE | 5,00 % | EUR | – 89,72 | 0,00 | – 89,72 | |
| Cross Compliance | 2009 | Weaknesses in SMR 7, 11, 16-18, tolerance applied for SMR4, CY2008 | FLAT RATE | 2,00 % | EUR | – 527 302,79 | 0,00 | – 527 302,79 | |
| Cross Compliance | 2010 | Weaknesses in SMR 7, 11, 16-18, tolerance applied for SMR4, CY2008 | FLAT RATE | 2,00 % | EUR | – 568,84 | 0,00 | – 568,84 | |
| Cross Compliance | 2011 | Weaknesses in SMR 7, 11, 16-18, tolerance applied for SMR4, CY2008 | FLAT RATE | 2,00 % | EUR | – 20,77 | 0,00 | – 20,77 | |
| Cross Compliance | 2010 | Weaknesses in SMR 7, 11, 16-18, tolerance applied for SMR4, CY2009 | FLAT RATE | 2,00 % | EUR | – 538 273,49 | 0,00 | – 538 273,49 | |
| Cross Compliance | 2011 | Weaknesses in SMR 7, 11, 16-18, tolerance applied for SMR4, CY2009 | FLAT RATE | 2,00 % | EUR | – 94,12 | 0,00 | – 94,12 | |
| Cross Compliance | 2011 | Weaknesses in SMR 7, 11, 16-18, tolerance applied for SMR4, CY2010 | FLAT RATE | 2,00 % | EUR | – 535 293,19 | – 794,71 | – 534 498,48 | |
| Total BE: | EUR | – 1 606 888,6 | – 794,71 | – 1 606 093,89 | |||||
| MS | Measure | FY | Reason | Type | Correction % | Currency | Amount | Deductions | Financial Impact |
| BG | Wine — Restructuring | 2010 | ineligible restructuring measure | ONE-OFF | 0,00 % | EUR | – 16 046,31 | 0,00 | – 16 046,31 |
| Wine — Restructuring | 2011 | ineligible restructuring measure | ONE-OFF | 0,00 % | EUR | – 27 397,9 | 0,00 | – 27 397,9 | |
| Wine — Restructuring | 2012 | ineligible restructuring measure | ONE-OFF | 0,00 % | EUR | – 97 089,53 | 0,00 | – 97 089,53 | |
| Wine — Restructuring | 2013 | ineligible restructuring measure | ONE-OFF | 0,00 % | EUR | – 33 338,19 | 0,00 | – 33 338,19 | |
| BG | Other Direct Aid — Article 68-72 of Reg.73/2009 | 2011 | Non-application of regulatory exclusions | ONE-OFF | 0,00 % | EUR | – 370 455,39 | – 18 522,77 | – 351 932,62 |
| Other Direct Aid — Article 68-72 of Reg.73/2009 | 2012 | Non-application of regulatory exclusions | ONE-OFF | 0,00 % | EUR | – 381 206,05 | – 19 060,3 | – 362 145,75 | |
| Other Direct Aid — Article 68-72 of Reg.73/2009 | 2013 | Non-application of regulatory exclusions | ONE-OFF | 0,00 % | EUR | – 248 886,64 | – 12 444,33 | – 236 442,31 | |
| Other Direct Aid — Article 68-72 of Reg.73/2009 | 2011 | Undue payments, OTSC weaknesses, insufficient control report template | FLAT RATE | 5,00 % | EUR | – 521 954,26 | 0,00 | – 521 954,26 | |
| Other Direct Aid — Article 68-72 of Reg.73/2009 | 2012 | Undue payments, OTSC weaknesses, insufficient control report template | FLAT RATE | 5,00 % | EUR | – 808 560,83 | 0,00 | – 808 560,83 | |
| Other Direct Aid — Article 68-72 of Reg.73/2009 | 2013 | Undue payments, OTSC weaknesses, insufficient control report template | FLAT RATE | 5,00 % | EUR | – 995 079,95 | 0,00 | – 995 079,95 | |
| BG | Decoupled Direct Aids | 2010 | Weaknesses in LPIS and administrative cross-checks, CY 2009 | FLAT RATE | 5,00 % | EUR | – 13 598 952,95 | 0,00 | – 13 598 952,95 |
| Decoupled Direct Aids | 2011 | Weaknesses in LPIS and administrative cross-checks, CY 2009 | FLAT RATE | 5,00 % | EUR | – 77 724,05 | 0,00 | – 77 724,05 | |
| BG | Decoupled Direct Aids | 2011 | Weaknesses in LPIS-GIS, CY 2010 | FLAT RATE | 5,00 % | EUR | – 14 660 582,12 | 0,00 | – 14 660 582,12 |
| Decoupled Direct Aids | 2012 | Weaknesses in LPIS-GIS, CY 2010 | FLAT RATE | 5,00 % | EUR | – 7 964,58 | 0,00 | – 7 964,58 | |
| Total BG: | EUR | – 31 845 238,75 | – 50 027,4 | – 31 795 211,35 | |||||
| MS | Measure | FY | Reason | Type | Correction % | Currency | Amount | Deductions | Financial Impact |
| CZ | Wine — Restructuring | 2010 | non-eligible forms of protection of vineyards against wild birds | ONE-OFF | 0,00 % | EUR | – 690 350,42 | 0,00 | – 690 350,42 |
| Wine — Restructuring | 2011 | non-eligible forms of protection of vineyards against wild birds | ONE-OFF | 0,00 % | EUR | – 865 307,63 | 0,00 | – 865 307,63 | |
| Wine — Restructuring | 2012 | non-eligible forms of protection of vineyards against wild birds | ONE-OFF | 0,00 % | EUR | – 567 540,99 | 0,00 | – 567 540,99 | |
| Total CZ: | EUR | – 2 123 199,04 | 0,00 | – 2 123 199,04 | |||||
| MS | Measure | FY | Reason | Type | Correction % | Currency | Amount | Deductions | Financial Impact |
| DE | Fruit and Vegetables — Operational Programmes | 2010 | ineligible expenditures for construction of a storage facility | ONE-OFF | 0,00 % | EUR | – 430 654,77 | 0,00 | – 430 654,77 |
| Fruit and Vegetables — Operational Programmes | 2009 | Weakness in a control on recognition criterion for producer organisations | FLAT RATE | 5,00 % | EUR | – 77 966,78 | 0,00 | – 77 966,78 | |
| Fruit and Vegetables — Operational Programmes | 2010 | Weakness in a control on recognition criterion for producer organisations | FLAT RATE | 5,00 % | EUR | – 153 735,28 | 0,00 | – 153 735,28 | |
| Fruit and Vegetables — Operational Programmes | 2011 | Weakness in a control on recognition criterion for producer organisations | FLAT RATE | 5,00 % | EUR | – 70 057,05 | 0,00 | – 70 057,05 | |
| DE | Cross Compliance | 2009 | Leniency of the sanctions for SMR7, CY 2008 | ONE-OFF | 0,00 % | EUR | – 190 178,1 | – 379,60 | – 189 798,5 |
| Cross Compliance | 2010 | Leniency of the sanctions for SMR7, CY 2009 | ONE-OFF | 0,00 % | EUR | – 150 339,66 | – 300,08 | – 150 039,58 | |
| Cross Compliance | 2011 | Leniency of the sanctions for SMR7, CY 2010 | ONE-OFF | 0,00 % | EUR | – 158 485,49 | – 316,34 | – 158 169,15 | |
| Cross Compliance | 2009 | Weaknesses in the control of SMR7, CY 2008 | FLAT RATE | 2,00 % | EUR | – 3 929 816,78 | – 126,22 | – 3 929 690,56 | |
| Cross Compliance | 2010 | Weaknesses in the control of SMR7, CY 2009 | FLAT RATE | 2,00 % | EUR | – 3 573 164,56 | 0,00 | – 3 573 164,56 | |
| Cross Compliance | 2011 | Weaknesses in the control of SMR7, CY 2010 | FLAT RATE | 2,00 % | EUR | – 3 463 572,31 | 0,00 | – 3 463 572,31 | |
| Total DE: | EUR | – 12 197 970,78 | – 1 122,24 | – 12 196 848,54 | |||||
| MS | Measure | FY | Reason | Type | Correction % | Currency | Amount | Deductions | Financial Impact |
| EE | Cross Compliance | 2010 | 1 GAEC not defined, limited control on SMR1 and 5, inadequate control of two SMR4 requirements, CY2009 | FLAT RATE | 2,00 % | EUR | – 123 269,5 | 0,00 | – 123 269,5 |
| Cross Compliance | 2011 | 1 GAEC not defined, limited control on SMR1 and 5, inadequate control of two SMR4 requirements, CY2009 | FLAT RATE | 2,00 % | EUR | – 1,71 | 0,00 | – 1,71 | |
| Cross Compliance | 2012 | Limited control on SMR1 and 5, inadequate control of one SMR4 requirements, CY2011 | FLAT RATE | 2,00 % | EUR | – 163 434,31 | 0,00 | – 163 434,31 | |
| Cross Compliance | 2011 | Limited control on SMR1 and 5, inadequate control of two SMR4 requirements, no respect of the seven days' deadline for notification, CY2010 | FLAT RATE | 2,00 % | EUR | – 143 245,25 | 0,00 | – 143 245,25 | |
| Cross Compliance | 2012 | Limited control on SMR1 and 5, inadequate control of two SMR4 requirements, no respect of the seven days' deadline for notification, CY2010 | FLAT RATE | 2,00 % | EUR | – 3,33 | 0,00 | – 3,33 | |
| Cross Compliance | 2010 | No control of SMR6, non-application of sanctions for the late notifications and modification of sanctions, CY2009 | ONE-OFF | 0,00 % | EUR | – 22 887,71 | – 45,78 | – 22 841,93 | |
| Total EE: | EUR | – 452 841,81 | – 45,78 | – 452 796,03 | |||||
| MS | Measure | FY | Reason | Type | Correction % | Currency | Amount | Deductions | Financial Impact |
| ES | Decoupled Direct Aids | 2009 | Ineffectiveness of risk analysis | ONE-OFF | 0,00 % | EUR | – 3 586 250,48 | 0,00 | – 3 586 250,48 |
| Decoupled Direct Aids | 2010 | Ineffectiveness of risk analysis | ONE-OFF | 0,00 % | EUR | – 1 866 977,31 | 0,00 | – 1 866 977,31 | |
| ES | Decoupled Direct Aids | 2008 | Non-compliance with the eligibility rules on permanent pasture, CY2007 | FLAT RATE | 2,00 % | EUR | – 389 865,14 | – 1 949,33 | – 387 915,81 |
| Decoupled Direct Aids | 2008 | Non-compliance with the eligibility rules on permanent pasture, CY2007 | FLAT RATE | 10,00 % | EUR | – 201 023,75 | – 1 005,12 | – 200 018,63 | |
| Decoupled Direct Aids | 2008 | Non-compliance with the eligibility rules on permanent pasture, CY2007 | FLAT RATE | 25,00 % | EUR | – 9 290 513,97 | – 46 452,57 | – 9 244 061,4 | |
| Decoupled Direct Aids | 2009 | Non-compliance with the eligibility rules on permanent pasture, CY2008 | FLAT RATE | 2,00 % | EUR | – 445 642,75 | – 2 228,22 | – 443 414,53 | |
| Decoupled Direct Aids | 2009 | Non-compliance with the eligibility rules on permanent pasture, CY2008 | FLAT RATE | 10,00 % | EUR | – 283 917,17 | – 1 419,59 | – 282 497,58 | |
| Decoupled Direct Aids | 2009 | Non-compliance with the eligibility rules on permanent pasture, CY2008 | FLAT RATE | 25,00 % | EUR | – 10 345 263,99 | – 51 726,32 | – 10 293 537,67 | |
| ES | Decoupled Direct Aids | 2007 | Deficiencies in LPIS and permanent pasture, CY 2006 | ONE-OFF | 0,00 % | EUR | – 20 976,39 | 0,00 | – 20 976,39 |
| Decoupled Direct Aids | 2008 | Deficiencies in LPIS and permanent pasture, CY 2007 | ONE-OFF | 0,00 % | EUR | – 1 994,65 | 0,00 | – 1 994,65 | |
| Decoupled Direct Aids | 2009 | Deficiencies in LPIS and permanent pasture, CY 2008 | ONE-OFF | 0,00 % | EUR | – 294 932,52 | 0,00 | – 294 932,52 | |
| ES | Cross Compliance | 2009 | Leniency of the sanctioning system, CY 2008 | ONE-OFF | 0,00 % | EUR | – 580 604,92 | – 479,70 | – 580 125,22 |
| ES | Clearance of Accounts — Conformity Clearance | 2011 | material error | ONE-OFF | 0,00 % | EUR | – 18 603,55 | 0,00 | – 18 603,55 |
| Total ES: | EUR | – 27 326 566,59 | – 105 260,85 | – 27 221 305,74 | |||||
| MS | Measure | FY | Reason | Type | Correction % | Currency | Amount | Deductions | Financial Impact |
| FR | Sugar — Restructuring Fund | 2009 | Correction due to partial restructuring instead of full restructuring | ONE-OFF | 0,00 % | EUR | – 69 980 526,56 | 0,00 | – 69 980 526,56 |
| Sugar — Restructuring Fund | 2009 | Correction due to quota reduction instead of full restructuring | ONE-OFF | 0,00 % | EUR | – 8 734 375,0 | 0,00 | – 8 734 375,0 | |
| Export refunds — Live animals | 2010 | procedures not compliant with the export refund regulations | FLAT RATE | 15,00 % | EUR | – 94 156,69 | 0,00 | – 94 156,69 | |
| Export refunds — Live animals | 2011 | procedures not compliant with the export refund regulations | FLAT RATE | 15,00 % | EUR | – 120 146,09 | 0,00 | – 120 146,09 | |
| Export refunds —Live animals | 2012 | procedures not compliant with the export refund regulations | FLAT RATE | 15,00 % | EUR | – 33 062,27 | 0,00 | – 33 062,27 | |
| FR | Other Direct Aid — Bovines | 2008 | Late notifications of movement | ONE-OFF | 0,00 % | EUR | – 39 685 694,63 | – 198 428,46 | – 39 487 266,17 |
| Other Direct Aid — Bovines | 2009 | Late notifications of movement | ONE-OFF | 0,00 % | EUR | – 41 704 273,69 | – 208 521,38 | – 41 495 752,31 | |
| Other Direct Aid — Bovines | 2010 | Late notifications of movement | ONE-OFF | 0,00 % | EUR | – 41 590 433,76 | – 83 423,53 | – 41 507 010,23 | |
| Other Direct Aid — Bovines | 2011 | Late notifications of movement | ONE-OFF | 0,00 % | EUR | – 300 981,5 | – 618,22 | – 300 363,28 | |
| Other Direct Aid — Bovines | 2012 | Late notifications of movement | ONE-OFF | 0,00 % | EUR | – 41 102,74 | 0,00 | – 41 102,74 | |
| FR | Decoupled Direct Aids | 2009 | Weaknesses in functioning of GIS, 1st pillar, CY2008 | ONE-OFF | 0,00 % | EUR | – 93 510 754,83 | 0,00 | – 93 510 754,83 |
| Decoupled Direct Aids | 2010 | Weaknesses in functioning of GIS, 1st pillar, CY2009 | ONE-OFF | 0,00 % | EUR | – 100 407 258,08 | 0,00 | – 100 407 258,08 | |
| Decoupled Direct Aids | 2011 | Weaknesses in functioning of GIS, 1st pillar, CY2010 | ONE-OFF | 0,00 % | EUR | – 136 794 783,91 | 0,00 | – 136 794 783,91 | |
| FR | Decoupled Direct Aids | 2012 | Weaknesses in LPIS-GIS, 1st pillar, CY2011 | FLAT RATE | 2,00 % | EUR | – 137 445 484,49 | – 51 680,63 | – 137 393 803,86 |
| Other Direct Aid — Article 68-72 of Reg. 73/2009 | 2012 | Weaknesses in LPIS-GIS, 1st pillar, CY2011 | FLAT RATE | 2,00 % | EUR | – 4 203 961,06 | 0,00 | – 4 203 961,06 | |
| Other Direct Aids | 2012 | Weaknesses in LPIS-GIS, 1st pillar, CY2011 | FLAT RATE | 2,00 % | EUR | – 1 115 587,1 | 0,00 | – 1 115 587,1 | |
| Other Direct Aid — Seeds | 2012 | Weaknesses in LPIS-GIS, 1st pillar, CY2011 | FLAT RATE | 2,00 % | EUR | – 39 946,65 | – 608,31 | – 39 338,34 | |
| Decoupled Direct Aids | 2012 | Weaknesses in LPIS-GIS, 1st pillar, CY2011 | FLAT RATE | 100,00 % | EUR | – 9 630 390,11 | 0,00 | – 9 630 390,11 | |
| Other Direct Aid — Article 68-72 of Reg. 73/2009 | 2012 | Weaknesses in LPIS-GIS, 1st pillar, CY2011 | FLAT RATE | 100,00 % | EUR | – 1 576 620,23 | 0,00 | – 1 576 620,23 | |
| Other Direct Aids | 2012 | Weaknesses in LPIS-GIS, 1st pillar, CY2011 | FLAT RATE | 100,00 % | EUR | – 968 446,88 | 0,01 | – 968 446,89 | |
| Decoupled Direct Aids | 2013 | Weaknesses in LPIS-GIS, 1st pillar, CY2011 | FLAT RATE | 2,00 % | EUR | – 37 597,17 | 0,00 | – 37 597,17 | |
| Other Direct Aid — Article 68-72 of Reg. 73/2009 | 2013 | Weaknesses in LPIS-GIS, 1st pillar, CY2011 | FLAT RATE | 2,00 % | EUR | – 5 914,26 | 0,00 | – 5 914,26 | |
| Other Direct Aids | 2013 | Weaknesses in LPIS-GIS, 1st pillar, CY2011 | FLAT RATE | 2,00 % | EUR | 321,53 | 0,00 | 321,53 | |
| Other Direct Aid — Seeds | 2013 | Weaknesses in LPIS-GIS, 1st pillar, CY2011 | FLAT RATE | 2,00 % | EUR | – 1 004,56 | 0,00 | – 1 004,56 | |
| Decoupled Direct Aids | 2013 | Weaknesses in LPIS-GIS, 1st pillar, CY2011 | FLAT RATE | 100,00 % | EUR | – 7 377,43 | 0,00 | – 7 377,43 | |
| Other Direct Aid — Article 68-72 of Reg. 73/2009 | 2013 | Weaknesses in LPIS-GIS, 1st pillar, CY2011 | FLAT RATE | 100,00 % | EUR | – 2 858,36 | 0,00 | – 2 858,36 | |
| Other Direct Aids | 2013 | Weaknesses in LPIS-GIS, 1st pillar, CY2011 | FLAT RATE | 100,00 % | EUR | 105,15 | 0,00 | 105,15 | |
| Decoupled Direct Aids | 2013 | Weaknesses in LPIS-GIS, 1st pillar, CY2012 | FLAT RATE | 2,00 % | EUR | – 137 992 099,19 | 0,00 | – 137 992 099,19 | |
| Other Direct Aid — Article 68-72 of Reg. 73/2009 | 2013 | Weaknesses in LPIS-GIS, 1st pillar, CY2012 | FLAT RATE | 2,00 % | EUR | – 4 605 692,86 | 0,00 | – 4 605 692,86 | |
| Other Direct Aids | 2013 | Weaknesses in LPIS-GIS, 1st pillar, CY2012 | FLAT RATE | 2,00 % | EUR | – 581 825,97 | 0,00 | – 581 825,97 | |
| Decoupled Direct Aids | 2013 | Weaknesses in LPIS-GIS, 1st pillar, CY2012 | FLAT RATE | 100,00 % | EUR | – 9 587 507,15 | 0,00 | – 9 587 507,15 | |
| Other Direct Aid — Article 68-72 of Reg.73/2009 | 2013 | Weaknesses in LPIS-GIS, 1st pillar, CY2012 | FLAT RATE | 100,00 % | EUR | – 1 648 707,28 | 0,00 | – 1 648 707,28 | |
| Other Direct Aids | 2013 | Weaknesses in LPIS-GIS, 1st pillar, CY2012 | FLAT RATE | 100,00 % | EUR | – 930 705,93 | 0,00 | – 930 705,93 | |
| FR | Entitlements | 2011 | Exceeding of the ceiling and incorrect application of the linear reduction | ONE-OFF | 0,00 % | EUR | – 51 088 369,44 | 0,00 | – 51 088 369,44 |
| Entitlements | 2012 | Exceeding of the ceiling and incorrect application of the linear reduction | ONE-OFF | 0,00 % | EUR | – 89 806 974,13 | 0,00 | – 89 806 974,13 | |
| Total FR: | EUR | – 984 274 193,32 | – 543 280,52 | – 983 730 912,8 | |||||
| MS | Measure | FY | Reason | Type | Correction % | Currency | Amount | Deductions | Financial Impact |
| HU | Sugar — Restructuring Fund | 2009 | Silos in the premises | ONE-OFF | 0,00 % | EUR | – 11 709 400,0 | 0,00 | – 11 709 400,0 |
| HU | Fruit and Vegetables — Operational Programmes | 2009 | Deficient checks of eligibility of expenditure declared in aid applications | FLAT RATE | 5,00 % | EUR | – 152 928,36 | 0,00 | – 152 928,36 |
| Fruit and Vegetables — Operational Programmes | 2010 | Deficient checks of eligibility of expenditure declared in aid applications | FLAT RATE | 5,00 % | EUR | – 182 798,14 | 0,00 | – 182 798,14 | |
| Fruit and Vegetables — Operational Programmes | 2011 | Deficient checks of eligibility of expenditure declared in aid applications | FLAT RATE | 5,00 % | EUR | – 121 313,14 | 0,00 | – 121 313,14 | |
| Fruit and Vegetables — Operational Programmes | 2012 | Deficient checks of eligibility of expenditure declared in aid applications | FLAT RATE | 5,00 % | EUR | – 136 159,8 | 0,00 | – 136 159,8 | |
| Fruit and Vegetables — Operational Programmes | 2013 | Deficient checks of eligibility of expenditure declared in aid applications | FLAT RATE | 5,00 % | EUR | – 114 906,7 | 0,00 | – 114 906,7 | |
| Total HU: | EUR | – 12 417 506,14 | 0,00 | – 12 417 506,14 | |||||
| MS | Measure | FY | Reason | Type | Correction % | Currency | Amount | Deductions | Financial Impact |
| IT | Sugar — Restructuring Fund | 2007 | Not correct interpretation of sugar production | ONE-OFF | 0,00 % | EUR | – 68 011 872,95 | 0,00 | – 68 011 872,95 |
| Sugar — Restructuring Fund | 2008 | Not correct interpretation of sugar production | ONE-OFF | 0,00 % | EUR | – 4 083 338,77 | 0,00 | – 4 083 338,77 | |
| Sugar — Restructuring Fund | 2009 | Not correct interpretation of sugar production | ONE-OFF | 0,00 % | EUR | – 18 403 523,44 | 0,00 | – 18 403 523,44 | |
| IT | Fruit and Vegetables — Pre-recognised Producer Groups | 2007 | weaknesses in the control system concerning the citrus processing scheme and preliminary recognition | FLAT RATE | 5,00 % | EUR | – 5 442,56 | 0,00 | – 5 442,56 |
| Fruit and Vegetables — Citrus Processing | 2008 | weaknesses in the control system concerning the citrus processing scheme and preliminary recognition | FLAT RATE | 5,00 % | EUR | – 25 041,16 | 0,00 | – 25 041,16 | |
| Fruit and Vegetables — Citrus Processing | 2008 | weaknesses in the control system concerning the citrus processing scheme and preliminary recognition | FLAT RATE | 10,00 % | EUR | – 1 790 270,5 | 0,00 | – 1 790 270,5 | |
| Fruit and Vegetables — Citrus Processing | 2008 | weaknesses in the control system concerning the citrus processing scheme and preliminary recognition | FLAT RATE | 15,00 % | EUR | – 20 819,74 | 0,00 | – 20 819,74 | |
| Fruit and Vegetables — Citrus Processing | 2009 | weaknesses in the control system concerning the citrus processing scheme and preliminary recognition | FLAT RATE | 5,00 % | EUR | – 13 461,76 | 0,00 | – 13 461,76 | |
| Fruit and Vegetables — Citrus Processing | 2009 | weaknesses in the control system concerning the citrus processing scheme and preliminary recognition | FLAT RATE | 15,00 % | EUR | – 1 177 488,95 | 0,00 | – 1 177 488,95 | |
| Fruit and Vegetables — Pre-recognised Producer Groups | 2010 | weaknesses in the control system concerning the citrus processing scheme and preliminary recognition | FLAT RATE | 5,00 % | EUR | – 9 409,76 | 0,00 | – 9 409,76 | |
| Fruit and Vegetables — Citrus Processing | 2010 | weaknesses in the control system concerning the citrus processing scheme and preliminary recognition | FLAT RATE | 15,00 % | EUR | 12 880,77 | 0,00 | 12 880,77 | |
| Fruit and Vegetables — Pre-recognised Producer Groups | 2011 | weaknesses in the control system concerning the citrus processing scheme and preliminary recognition | FLAT RATE | 5,00 % | EUR | – 3 366,26 | 0,00 | – 3 366,26 | |
| Fruit and Vegetables — Citrus Processing | 2012 | weaknesses in the control system concerning the citrus processing scheme and preliminary recognition | FLAT RATE | 5,00 % | EUR | – 1 261,24 | 0,00 | – 1 261,24 | |
| Fruit and Vegetables — Citrus Processing | 2012 | weaknesses in the control system concerning the citrus processing scheme and preliminary recognition | FLAT RATE | 15,00 % | EUR | 427,98 | 0,00 | 427,98 | |
| IT | Fruit and Vegetables — Citrus Processing | 2008 | Weaknesses in key controls and failure to apply sanctions | FLAT RATE | 10,00 % | EUR | – 1 767 966,48 | 0,00 | – 1 767 966,48 |
| Fruit and Vegetables — Citrus Processing | 2008 | Weaknesses in key controls and failure to apply sanctions | FLAT RATE | 15,00 % | EUR | – 7 653,03 | 0,00 | – 7 653,03 | |
| Fruit and Vegetables — Citrus Processing | 2009 | Weaknesses in key controls and failure to apply sanctions | FLAT RATE | 15,00 % | EUR | – 275 541,07 | 0,00 | – 275 541,07 | |
| Fruit and Vegetables — Citrus Processing | 2010 | Weaknesses in key controls and failure to apply sanctions | FLAT RATE | 15,00 % | EUR | 3 549,05 | 0,00 | 3 549,05 | |
| Fruit and Vegetables — Citrus Processing | 2011 | Weaknesses in key controls and failure to apply sanctions | FLAT RATE | 15,00 % | EUR | 2 290,13 | 0,00 | 2 290,13 | |
| IT | Promotional Measures | 2009 | Lack of control | FLAT RATE | 10,00 % | EUR | – 173 822,13 | 0,00 | – 173 822,13 |
| Promotional Measures | 2009 | Late payments | ONE-OFF | 0,00 % | EUR | – 701 700,28 | 0,00 | – 701 700,28 | |
| Promotional Measures | 2010 | Late payments | ONE-OFF | 0,00 % | EUR | – 497 130,75 | 0,00 | – 497 130,75 | |
| Promotional Measures | 2008 | unauthorised extension of the programme concerning the promotion of dairy products in schools | ONE-OFF | 0,00 % | EUR | – 103 274,84 | – 16 388,37 | – 86 886,47 | |
| Promotional Measures | 2009 | unauthorised extension of the programme concerning the promotion of dairy products in schools | ONE-OFF | 0,00 % | EUR | – 258 332,75 | 0,00 | – 258 332,75 | |
| IT | Financial audit — Overshooting | 2010 | exceeding of ceilings | ONE-OFF | 0,00 % | EUR | – 9 590,84 | – 9 590,84 | 0,00 |
| Financial audit — Late payments and payment deadlines | 2010 | late payments | ONE-OFF | 0,00 % | EUR | – 4 006 192,72 | – 4 006 192,72 | 0,00 | |
| Sugar — Assigned Revenue | 2010 | sugar temporary restructuring — marketing year 08/09 | ONE-OFF | 0,00 % | EUR | – 3 821 654,32 | – 3 821 654,32 | 0,00 | |
| Milk — Quota | 2010 | milk levies | ONE-OFF | 0,00 % | EUR | 193 832,77 | 193 832,77 | 0,00 | |
| Total IT: | EUR | – 104 955 175,6 | – 7 659 993,48 | – 97 295 182,12 | |||||
| MS | Measure | FY | Reason | Type | Correction % | Currency | Amount | Deductions | Financial Impact |
| LT | Decoupled Direct Aids | 2008 | shortcomings in LPIS-GIS, CY2007 | FLAT RATE | 3,00 % | EUR | – 4 381 809,55 | – 16 050,66 | – 4 365 758,89 |
| Decoupled Direct Aids | 2009 | shortcomings in LPIS-GIS, CY2007 | FLAT RATE | 3,00 % | EUR | – 2 406,42 | – 4,81 | – 2 401,61 | |
| Decoupled Direct Aids | 2010 | shortcomings in LPIS-GIS, CY2007 | FLAT RATE | 3,00 % | EUR | – 336,27 | – 0,67 | – 335,60 | |
| Decoupled Direct Aids | 2009 | shortcomings in LPIS-GIS, CY2008 | FLAT RATE | 3,00 % | EUR | – 5 503 048,25 | – 19 432,96 | – 5 483 615,29 | |
| Decoupled Direct Aids | 2010 | shortcomings in LPIS-GIS, CY2008 | FLAT RATE | 3,00 % | EUR | – 2 777,28 | – 5,55 | – 2 771,73 | |
| Decoupled Direct Aids | 2011 | shortcomings in LPIS-GIS, CY2008 | FLAT RATE | 3,00 % | EUR | – 84,89 | 0,00 | – 84,89 | |
| Total LT: | EUR | – 9 890 462,66 | – 35 494,65 | – 9 854 968,01 | |||||
| MS | Measure | FY | Reason | Type | Correction % | Currency | Amount | Deductions | Financial Impact |
| RO | Decoupled Direct Aids | 2010 | Weaknesses in the administrative cross-checks and on-the-spot checks | FLAT RATE | 10,00 % | EUR | – 60 723 392,19 | – 2 629 950,76 | – 58 093 441,43 |
| Other Direct Aid — Energy Crops | 2010 | Weaknesses in the administrative cross-checks and on-the-spot checks | FLAT RATE | 10,00 % | EUR | – 185 062,92 | – 370,13 | – 184 692,79 | |
| Other Direct Aids | 2010 | Weaknesses in the administrative cross-checks and on-the-spot checks | FLAT RATE | 10,00 % | EUR | – 83 561,22 | – 7 140,83 | – 76 420,39 | |
| Decoupled Direct Aids | 2011 | Weaknesses in the administrative cross-checks and on-the-spot checks | FLAT RATE | 5,00 % | EUR | – 34 885 948,11 | – 765 982,0 | – 34 119 966,11 | |
| Other Direct Aids | 2011 | Weaknesses in the administrative cross-checks and on-the-spot checks | FLAT RATE | 5,00 % | EUR | – 40 279,67 | 0,00 | – 40 279,67 | |
| Decoupled Direct Aids | 2011 | Weaknesses in the administrative cross-checks and on-the-spot checks | FLAT RATE | 10,00 % | EUR | – 14 498,34 | – 29,00 | – 14 469,34 | |
| Other Direct Aid — Energy Crops | 2011 | Weaknesses in the administrative cross-checks and on-the-spot checks | FLAT RATE | 10,00 % | EUR | – 23,62 | – 0,05 | – 23,57 | |
| Other Direct Aids | 2011 | Weaknesses in the administrative cross-checks and on-the-spot checks | FLAT RATE | 10,00 % | EUR | 6,62 | 0,01 | 6,61 | |
| Decoupled Direct Aids | 2012 | Weaknesses in the administrative cross-checks and on-the-spot checks | FLAT RATE | 5,00 % | EUR | – 40 874,57 | 0,00 | – 40 874,57 | |
| Decoupled Direct Aids | 2012 | Weaknesses in the administrative cross-checks and on-the-spot checks | FLAT RATE | 10,00 % | EUR | 98 628,64 | 0,00 | 98 628,64 | |
| Other Direct Aid — Energy Crops | 2012 | Weaknesses in the administrative cross-checks and on-the-spot checks | FLAT RATE | 10,00 % | EUR | 6,51 | 0,00 | 6,51 | |
| Total RO: | EUR | – 95 874 998,87 | – 3 403 472,76 | – 92 471 526,11 |