{
  "url": "https://openlegislation.uk/eu-decision-2015-103/annex/division-5",
  "json_url": "https://openlegislation.uk/eu-decision-2015-103/annex/division-5.json",
  "legislation": "eudn/2015/103",
  "legislation_title": "Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2015/103 of 16 January 2015 excluding from European Union financing certain expenditure incurred by the Member States under the European Agricultural Guarantee Fund (EAGF) and under the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) (notified under document C(2015) 53) (Only the Bulgarian, Czech, Dutch, English, Estonian, French, German, Hungarian, Italian, Lithuanian, Romanian and Spanish, texts are authentic)",
  "legislation_url": "https://openlegislation.uk/eu-decision-2015-103",
  "path": "annex/division/5",
  "kind": "division",
  "number": null,
  "heading": "Budget Item: 6711",
  "text": "MS\nMeasure\nFY\nReason\nType\nCorrection %\nCurrency\nAmount\nDeductions\nFinancial Impact\nAT\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area-related measures)\n2011\nLack of verification of all the parcels for Agri Environment measure during the on-the-spot controls\nONE-OFF\n0,00 %\nEUR\n– 172 799,0\n0,00\n– 172 799,0\nTotal AT:\nEUR\n– 172 799,0\n0,00\n– 172 799,0\nMS\nMeasure\nFY\nReason\nType\nCorrection %\nCurrency\nAmount\nDeductions\nFinancial Impact\nBE\nCross Compliance\n2008\nWeaknesses in SMR 7, 11, 16-18, tolerance applied and sampling used for land checks, CY2007\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 132,46\n0,00\n– 132,46\nCross Compliance\n2009\nWeaknesses in SMR 7, 11, 16-18, tolerance applied and sampling used for land checks, CY2007\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 1 653,95\n0,00\n– 1 653,95\nCross Compliance\n2010\nWeaknesses in SMR 7, 11, 16-18, tolerance applied and sampling used for land checks, CY2007\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 1,14\n0,00\n– 1,14\nCross Compliance\n2009\nWeaknesses in SMR 7, 11, 16-18, tolerance applied for SMR4, CY2008\nFLAT RATE\n2,00 %\nEUR\n– 1 295,08\n0,00\n– 1 295,08\nCross Compliance\n2010\nWeaknesses in SMR 7, 11, 16-18, tolerance applied for SMR4, CY2008\nFLAT RATE\n2,00 %\nEUR\n– 113,50\n0,00\n– 113,50\nCross Compliance\n2011\nWeaknesses in SMR 7, 11, 16-18, tolerance applied for SMR4, CY2008\nFLAT RATE\n2,00 %\nEUR\n– 24,08\n0,00\n– 24,08\nCross Compliance\n2010\nWeaknesses in SMR 7, 11, 16-18, tolerance applied for SMR4, CY2009\nFLAT RATE\n2,00 %\nEUR\n– 3 618,32\n0,00\n– 3 618,32\nCross Compliance\n2011\nWeaknesses in SMR 7, 11, 16-18, tolerance applied for SMR4, CY2009\nFLAT RATE\n2,00 %\nEUR\n– 319,78\n0,00\n– 319,78\nCross Compliance\n2011\nWeaknesses in SMR 7, 11, 16-18, tolerance applied for SMR4, CY2010\nFLAT RATE\n2,00 %\nEUR\n– 6 628,4\n0,00\n– 6 628,4\nTotal BE:\nEUR\n– 13 786,71\n0,00\n– 13 786,71\nMS\nMeasure\nFY\nReason\nType\nCorrection %\nCurrency\nAmount\nDeductions\nFinancial Impact\nBG\nRural Development EAFRD Complement to direct payment (2007-2013)\n2010\nWeaknesses in LPIS and administrative cross-checks, CY 2009\nFLAT RATE\n2,00 %\nEUR\n– 578 205,77\n0,00\n– 578 205,77\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area-related measures)\n2010\nWeaknesses in LPIS and administrative cross-checks, CY 2009\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 1 056 462,98\n0,00\n– 1 056 462,98\nRural Development EAFRD Complement to direct payment (2007-2013)\n2011\nWeaknesses in LPIS and administrative cross-checks, CY 2009\nFLAT RATE\n2,00 %\nEUR\n– 2 261,71\n0,00\n– 2 261,71\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area-related measures)\n2011\nWeaknesses in LPIS and administrative cross-checks, CY 2009\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 26 659,78\n0,00\n– 26 659,78\nBG\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area-related measures)\n2011\nWeaknesses in LPIS-GIS, RD area-based measures, CY 2010\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 1 053 616,25\n0,00\n– 1 053 616,25\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area-related measures)\n2012\nWeaknesses in LPIS-GIS, RD area-based measures, CY 2010\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n27 637,25\n0,00\n27 637,25\nBG\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 1 — Measures with flat rate support (2007-2013)\n2009\ndeficiencies in verification of the compliance with the business plan and in detecting the artificial split of a holding; lack of sanctions\nFLAT RATE\n10,00 %\nEUR\n– 1 130 931,01\n0,00\n– 1 130 931,01\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 1 — Measures with flat rate support (2007-2013)\n2010\ndeficiencies in verification of the compliance with the business plan and in detecting the artificial split of a holding; lack of sanctions\nFLAT RATE\n10,00 %\nEUR\n– 2 900 737,58\n0,00\n– 2 900 737,58\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 1 — Measures with flat rate support (2007-2013)\n2011\ndeficiencies in verification of the compliance with the business plan and in detecting the artificial split of a holding; lack of sanctions\nFLAT RATE\n10,00 %\nEUR\n– 39 805,58\n0,00\n– 39 805,58\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 1 — Measures with flat rate support (2007-2013)\n2012\ndeficiencies in verification of the compliance with the business plan and in detecting the artificial split of a holding; lack of sanctions\nFLAT RATE\n10,00 %\nEUR\n– 497 441,06\n0,00\n– 497 441,06\nBG\nRural Development EAGGF (2000-2006) — Technical Assistance\n2011\nnon-compliance related to measure 511\nONE-OFF\n100,00 %\nEUR\n– 151 668,0\n0,00\n– 151 668,0\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 1+3 — Investment orientated measures (2007-2013)\n2010\nSeveral non-compliances related to measures M312 and M322\nFLAT RATE\n10,00 %\nEUR\n– 10 606 528,94\n0,00\n– 10 606 528,94\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 1+3 — Investment orientated measures (2007-2013)\n2011\nSeveral non-compliances related to measures M312 and M322\nFLAT RATE\n10,00 %\nEUR\n– 4 401 144,55\n0,00\n– 4 401 144,55\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 1+3 — Investment orientated measures (2007-2013)\n2012\nSeveral non-compliances related to measures M312 and M322\nFLAT RATE\n10,00 %\nEUR\n– 4 378 829,25\n0,00\n– 4 378 829,25\nBG\nRural Development EAFRD Technical Assistance (2007-2013)\n2011\nDouble charging of meeting costs\nONE-OFF\n0,00 %\nEUR\n– 924,76\n0,00\n– 924,76\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 1 — Measures with flat rate support (2007-2013)\n2010\nNot enough checks on eligibility of the beneficiaries\nFLAT RATE\n10,00 %\nEUR\n– 85 150,3\n0,00\n– 85 150,3\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 1 — Measures with flat rate support (2007-2013)\n2011\nNot enough checks on eligibility of the beneficiaries\nFLAT RATE\n10,00 %\nEUR\n– 284 234,1\n0,00\n– 284 234,1\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 1 — Measures with flat rate support (2007-2013)\n2012\nNot enough checks on eligibility of the beneficiaries\nFLAT RATE\n10,00 %\nEUR\n– 639 466,76\n0,00\n– 639 466,76\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 1 — Measures with flat rate support (2007-2013)\n2013\nNot enough checks on eligibility of the beneficiaries\nFLAT RATE\n10,00 %\nEUR\n– 580 221,14\n0,00\n– 580 221,14\nRural Development EAFRD Technical Assistance (2007-2013)\n2010\nNot sufficient verification of the reasonableness of the costs\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 648,51\n0,00\n– 648,51\nRural Development EAFRD Technical Assistance (2007-2013)\n2011\nNot sufficient verification of the reasonableness of the costs\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 4 495,26\n0,00\n– 4 495,26\nRural Development EAFRD Technical Assistance (2007-2013)\n2012\nNot sufficient verification of the reasonableness of the costs\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 5 406,06\n0,00\n– 5 406,06\nTotal BG:\nEUR\n– 28 397 202,1\n0,00\n– 28 397 202,1\nMS\nMeasure\nFY\nReason\nType\nCorrection %\nCurrency\nAmount\nDeductions\nFinancial Impact\nDE\nCross Compliance\n2009\nWeaknesses in the control of SMR7, CY 2008\nFLAT RATE\n2,00 %\nEUR\n– 330 782,29\n0,00\n– 330 782,29\nCross Compliance\n2010\nWeaknesses in the control of SMR7, CY 2009\nFLAT RATE\n2,00 %\nEUR\n– 322 006,97\n0,00\n– 322 006,97\nCross Compliance\n2011\nWeaknesses in the control of SMR7, CY 2010\nFLAT RATE\n2,00 %\nEUR\n– 351 121,54\n0,00\n– 351 121,54\nTotal DE:\nEUR\n– 1 003 910,8\n0,00\n– 1 003 910,8\nMS\nMeasure\nFY\nReason\nType\nCorrection %\nCurrency\nAmount\nDeductions\nFinancial Impact\nEE\nCross Compliance\n2010\n1 GAEC not defined, limited control on SMR1 and 5, inadequate control of two SMR4 requirements, CY2009\nFLAT RATE\n2,00 %\nEUR\n– 86 527,0\n0,00\n– 86 527,0\nCross Compliance\n2011\n1 GAEC not defined, limited control on SMR1 and 5, inadequate control of two SMR4 requirements, CY2009\nFLAT RATE\n2,00 %\nEUR\n456,86\n0,00\n456,86\nCross Compliance\n2012\n1 GAEC not defined, limited control on SMR1 and 5, inadequate control of two SMR4 requirements, CY2009\nFLAT RATE\n2,00 %\nEUR\n603,29\n0,00\n603,29\nCross Compliance\n2012\nLimited control on SMR1 and 5, inadequate control of one SMR4 requirements, CY2011\nFLAT RATE\n2,00 %\nEUR\n– 90 866,75\n0,00\n– 90 866,75\nCross Compliance\n2011\nLimited control on SMR1 and 5, inadequate control of two SMR4 requirements, no respect of the seven days' deadline for notification, CY2010\nFLAT RATE\n2,00 %\nEUR\n– 89 214,59\n0,00\n– 89 214,59\nCross Compliance\n2012\nLimited control on SMR1 and 5, inadequate control of two SMR4 requirements, no respect of the seven days' deadline for notification, CY2010\nFLAT RATE\n2,00 %\nEUR\n455,76\n0,00\n455,76\nTotal EE:\nEUR\n– 265 092,43\n0,00\n– 265 092,43\nMS\nMeasure\nFY\nReason\nType\nCorrection %\nCurrency\nAmount\nDeductions\nFinancial Impact\nES\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area-related measures)\n2010\nWeaknesses in on-the-spot controls\nFLAT RATE\n2,00 %\nEUR\n– 1 479,9\n0,00\n– 1 479,9\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area-related measures)\n2010\nWeaknesses in on-the-spot controls\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 978 849,95\n0,00\n– 978 849,95\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area-related measures)\n2010\nWeaknesses in on-the-spot controls\nONE-OFF\n100,00 %\nEUR\n– 12 597,37\n0,00\n– 12 597,37\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area-related measures)\n2011\nWeaknesses in on-the-spot controls\nFLAT RATE\n2,00 %\nEUR\n– 1 720,85\n0,00\n– 1 720,85\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area-related measures)\n2011\nWeaknesses in on-the-spot controls\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 1 096 710,18\n0,00\n– 1 096 710,18\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area-related measures)\n2011\nWeaknesses in on-the-spot controls\nONE-OFF\n100,00 %\nEUR\n– 32 261,41\n0,00\n– 32 261,41\nES\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area-related measures)\n2011\nOn-the-spot control weaknesses\nFLAT RATE\n2,00 %\nEUR\n– 22 983,32\n0,00\n– 22 983,32\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area-related measures)\n2011\nOn-the-spot control weaknesses\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 451 758,84\n0,00\n– 451 758,84\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area-related measures)\n2012\nOn-the-spot control weaknesses\nFLAT RATE\n2,00 %\nEUR\n3,22\n0,00\n3,22\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area-related measures)\n2012\nOn-the-spot control weaknesses\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n268,60\n0,00\n268,60\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area-related measures)\n2013\nOn-the-spot control weaknesses\nFLAT RATE\n2,00 %\nEUR\n– 21 372,7\n0,00\n– 21 372,7\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area-related measures)\n2013\nOn-the-spot control weaknesses\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 601 583,12\n0,00\n– 601 583,12\nTotal ES:\nEUR\n– 3 221 045,82\n0,00\n– 3 221 045,82\nMS\nMeasure\nFY\nReason\nType\nCorrection %\nCurrency\nAmount\nDeductions\nFinancial Impact\nFR\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area-related measures)\n2009\nWeaknesses in functioning of GIS, 2nd pillar, CY2008\nONE-OFF\n0,00 %\nEUR\n– 14 456 604,5\n0,00\n– 14 456 604,5\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area-related measures)\n2010\nWeaknesses in functioning of GIS, 2nd pillar, CY2009\nONE-OFF\n0,00 %\nEUR\n– 16 193 248,79\n– 14 486 350,16\n– 1 706 898,63\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area-related measures)\n2011\nWeaknesses in functioning of GIS, 2nd pillar, CY2010\nONE-OFF\n0,00 %\nEUR\n– 19 491 684,44\n0,00\n– 19 491 684,44\nFR\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area-related measures)\n2011\nWeaknesses in LPIS-GIS, 2nd pillar, CY2011\nFLAT RATE\n2,00 %\nEUR\n– 7 299 553,84\n– 6 146 925,42\n– 1 152 628,42\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area-related measures)\n2012\nWeaknesses in LPIS-GIS, 2nd pillar, CY2011\nFLAT RATE\n2,00 %\nEUR\n– 6 946 695,98\n– 62 851,32\n– 6 883 844,66\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area-related measures)\n2013\nWeaknesses in LPIS-GIS, 2nd pillar, CY2011\nFLAT RATE\n2,00 %\nEUR\n– 20 046,89\n0,00\n– 20 046,89\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area-related measures)\n2012\nWeaknesses in LPIS-GIS, 2nd pillar, CY2012\nFLAT RATE\n2,00 %\nEUR\n– 4 455 428,1\n– 11 315,1\n– 4 444 113,0\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area-related measures)\n2013\nWeaknesses in LPIS-GIS, 2nd pillar, CY2012\nFLAT RATE\n2,00 %\nEUR\n– 6 185 646,07\n0,00\n– 6 185 646,07\nFR\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 1+3 — Investment orientated measures (2007-2013)\n2012\nChecks on subsidised loans not efficient enough (destroyed files)\nEXTRAPOLATED\n2,50 %\nEUR\n– 450 688,26\n0,00\n– 450 688,26\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 1+3 — Investment orientated measures (2007-2013)\n2013\nChecks on subsidised loans not efficient enough (destroyed files)\nEXTRAPOLATED\n2,50 %\nEUR\n– 450 688,26\n0,00\n– 450 688,26\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 1+3 — Investment orientated measures (2007-2013)\n2010\nChecks on subsidised loans not efficient enough (too late audits at banks)\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 200 489,14\n0,00\n– 200 489,14\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 1+3 — Investment orientated measures (2007-2013)\n2011\nChecks on subsidised loans not efficient enough (too late audits at banks)\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 67 364,26\n0,00\n– 67 364,26\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 1+3 — Investment orientated measures (2007-2013)\n2012\nChecks on subsidised loans not efficient enough (too late audits at banks)\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 283 029,2\n0,00\n– 283 029,2\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 1+3 — Investment orientated measures (2007-2013)\n2013\nChecks on subsidised loans not efficient enough (too late audits at banks)\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 97 146,22\n0,00\n– 97 146,22\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 1+3 — Investment orientated measures (2007-2013)\n2010\nChecks on subsidised loans not efficient enough (incorrect database)\nEXTRAPOLATED\n3,50 %\nEUR\n– 941 086,34\n0,00\n– 941 086,34\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 1+3 — Investment orientated measures (2007-2013)\n2011\nChecks on subsidised loans not efficient enough (incorrect database)\nEXTRAPOLATED\n3,50 %\nEUR\n– 496 893,06\n0,00\n– 496 893,06\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 1+3 — Investment orientated measures (2007-2013)\n2012\nChecks on subsidised loans not efficient enough (incorrect database)\nEXTRAPOLATED\n3,50 %\nEUR\n– 463 037,93\n0,00\n– 463 037,93\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 1+3 — Investment orientated measures (2007-2013)\n2013\nChecks on subsidised loans not efficient enough (incorrect database)\nEXTRAPOLATED\n3,50 %\nEUR\n– 711 789,53\n0,00\n– 711 789,53\nFR\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area-related measures)\n2010\nlack of procedure to increase on-the-spot checks in case of significant irregularities\nFLAT RATE\n2,00 %\nEUR\n– 1 593 202,58\n– 338,82\n– 1 592 863,76\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area-related measures)\n2010\nlack of procedure to increase on-the-spot checks in case of significant irregularities\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 22 599 169,32\n– 14 045,11\n– 22 585 124,21\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area-related measures)\n2011\nlack of procedure to increase on-the-spot checks in case of significant irregularities\nFLAT RATE\n2,00 %\nEUR\n– 2 086 278,69\n– 66,59\n– 2 086 212,1\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area-related measures)\n2011\nlack of procedure to increase on-the-spot checks in case of significant irregularities\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 8 979 022,05\n– 3,78\n– 8 979 018,27\nFR\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area-related measures)\n2010\nlack of verification of the livestock density calculation during the on-the-spot controls\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 208 364,56\n0,00\n– 208 364,56\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area-related measures)\n2011\nlack of verification of the livestock density calculation during the on-the-spot controls\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 140 966,63\n0,00\n– 140 966,63\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area-related measures)\n2012\nlack of verification of the livestock density calculation during the on-the-spot controls\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 395 152,92\n0,00\n– 395 152,92\nTotal FR:\nEUR\n– 115 213 277,56\n– 20 721 896,3\n– 94 491 381,26\nMS\nMeasure\nFY\nReason\nType\nCorrection %\nCurrency\nAmount\nDeductions\nFinancial Impact\nLT\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area-related measures)\n2008\nshortcomings in LPIS-GIS, CY2007\nFLAT RATE\n3,00 %\nEUR\n– 1 478 818,01\n– 200 608,66\n– 1 278 209,35\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area-related measures)\n2009\nshortcomings in LPIS-GIS, CY2007\nFLAT RATE\n3,00 %\nEUR\n– 347,40\n0,00\n– 347,40\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area-related measures)\n2010\nshortcomings in LPIS-GIS, CY2007\nFLAT RATE\n3,00 %\nEUR\n4 533,21\n0,00\n4 533,21\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area-related measures)\n2009\nshortcomings in LPIS-GIS, CY2008\nFLAT RATE\n3,00 %\nEUR\n– 2 290 292,11\n– 1 030 733,22\n– 1 259 558,89\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area-related measures)\n2010\nshortcomings in LPIS-GIS, CY2008\nFLAT RATE\n3,00 %\nEUR\n– 1 145 968,82\n– 1 143 299,68\n– 2 669,14\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area-related measures)\n2011\nshortcomings in LPIS-GIS, CY2008\nFLAT RATE\n3,00 %\nEUR\n1 519,76\n0,00\n1 519,76\nTotal LT:\nEUR\n– 4 909 373,37\n– 2 374 641,56\n– 2 534 731,81\nMS\nMeasure\nFY\nReason\nType\nCorrection %\nCurrency\nAmount\nDeductions\nFinancial Impact\nRO\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area-related measures)\n2010\nWeaknesses in the administrative cross-checks and on-the-spot checks\nFLAT RATE\n10,00 %\nEUR\n– 22 850 154,78\n– 6 418 693,16\n– 16 431 461,62\nRural Development EAFRD Complement to direct payment (2007-2013)\n2010\nWeaknesses in the administrative cross-checks and on-the-spot checks\nFLAT RATE\n10,00 %\nEUR\n– 8 507 107,3\n– 1 459 929,21\n– 7 047 178,09\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area-related measures)\n2011\nWeaknesses in the administrative cross-checks and on-the-spot checks\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 13 471 514,97\n– 2 311 644,65\n– 11 159 870,32\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area-related measures)\n2011\nWeaknesses in the administrative cross-checks and on-the-spot checks\nFLAT RATE\n10,00 %\nEUR\n– 129 773,68\n481,74\n– 130 255,42\nRural Development EAFRD Complement to direct payment (2007-2013)\n2011\nWeaknesses in the administrative cross-checks and on-the-spot checks\nFLAT RATE\n10,00 %\nEUR\n10 435,76\n0,00\n10 435,76\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area-related measures)\n2012\nWeaknesses in the administrative cross-checks and on-the-spot checks\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 1 924 121,26\n– 330 203,99\n– 1 593 917,27\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area-related measures)\n2012\nWeaknesses in the administrative cross-checks and on-the-spot checks\nFLAT RATE\n10,00 %\nEUR\n394 552,63\n0,00\n394 552,63\nRural Development EAFRD Complement to direct payment (2007-2013)\n2012\nWeaknesses in the administrative cross-checks and on-the-spot checks\nFLAT RATE\n10,00 %\nEUR\n60 445,3\n0,00\n60 445,3\nTotal RO:\nEUR\n– 46 417 238,3\n– 10 519 989,27\n– 35 897 249,03",
  "extent": "E+W+S+N.I.",
  "status": null,
  "version": "current",
  "annotations": [],
  "outstanding_effects": [],
  "provenance": {
    "source": "legislation.gov.uk",
    "source_url": "https://www.legislation.gov.uk/eudn/2015/103/annex/division/5",
    "retrieved_at": "2026-11-01T15:14:29.945644+00:00"
  },
  "licence": "Open Government Licence v3.0",
  "licence_url": "https://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/version/3/",
  "attribution": "Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Source: legislation.gov.uk, The National Archives."
}