{
  "url": "https://openlegislation.uk/eu-decision-2015-1119/annex/division-3",
  "json_url": "https://openlegislation.uk/eu-decision-2015-1119/annex/division-3.json",
  "legislation": "eudn/2015/1119",
  "legislation_title": "Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2015/1119 of 22 June 2015 excluding from European Union financing certain expenditure incurred by the Member States under the European Agricultural Guarantee Fund (EAGF) and under the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) (notified under document C(2015) 4076) (only the Bulgarian, Spanish, Danish, German, Estonian, Greek, English, French, Italian, Lithuanian, Hungarian, Dutch, Polish, Portuguese, Romanian, Slovak, Slovenian, Finnish, Swedish texts are authentic)",
  "legislation_url": "https://openlegislation.uk/eu-decision-2015-1119",
  "path": "annex/division/3",
  "kind": "division",
  "number": null,
  "heading": "Budget Item: 6701",
  "text": "Member State\nMeasure\nFY\nReason\nType\nCorrection (%)\nCurrency\nAmount\nDeductions\nFinancial Impact\nAT\nDecoupled Direct Aids\n2013\nParcels of less than 1ha considered eligible, CY 2012\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 162 066,1\n0,00\n– 162 066,1\nDecoupled Direct Aids\n2014\nParcels of less than 1ha considered eligible, CY 2013\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 162 711,68\n0,00\n– 162 711,68\nTotal AT:\nEUR\n– 324 777,78\n0,00\n– 324 777,78\nMember State\nMeasure\nFY\nReason\nType\nCorrection (%)\nCurrency\nAmount\nDeductions\nFinancial Impact\nBE\nCertification\n2010\nMost Likely Error (EAGF non IACS)\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 175 150,72\n– 175 150,72\n0,00\nCertification\n2011\nmost likely error (EAGF)\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 32 450,87\n0,00\n– 32 450,87\nIrregularities\n2011\nirregularity linked to fraud and negligence\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 1 079 342,45\n0,00\n– 1 079 342,45\nCertification\n2012\nknown errors\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 33 204,64\n0,00\n– 33 204,64\nCertification\n2012\nMost Likely Error (EAGF non-IACS)\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 29 338,31\n0,00\n– 29 338,31\nDecoupled Direct Aids\n2012\nWeaknesses in the LPIS, claim year 2011-2012\nONE OFF\n0,00\nEUR\n– 175 411,89\n0,00\n– 175 411,89\nDecoupled Direct Aids\n2013\nWeaknesses in the LPIS, claim year 2011-2012\nONE OFF\n0,00\nEUR\n– 128 392,16\n0,00\n– 128 392,16\nTotal BE:\nEUR\n– 1 653 291,04\n– 175 150,72\n– 1 478 140,32\nMember State\nMeasure\nFY\nReason\nType\nCorrection (%)\nCurrency\nAmount\nDeductions\nFinancial Impact\nBG\nCross Compliance\n2011\nNo evaluation of non-compliances, weakness in risk analysis, CY2011\nFLAT RATE\n2,00\nEUR\n– 9 131,86\n0,00\n– 9 131,86\nCross Compliance\n2012\nNo evaluation of non-compliances, weakness in risk analysis, CY2011\nFLAT RATE\n2,00\nEUR\n– 778 045,93\n– 194,18\n– 777 851,75\nCross Compliance\n2009\nWeaknesses in the control of 3 GAEC standards, No evaluation of non-compliances, CY2008\nFLAT RATE\n2,00\nEUR\n– 252 397,38\n– 25 017,88\n– 227 379,5\nCross Compliance\n2010\nWeaknesses in the control of 3 GAEC standards, No evaluation of non-compliances, CY2008\nFLAT RATE\n2,00\nEUR\n– 191,38\n0,00\n– 191,38\nCross Compliance\n2011\nWeaknesses in the control of 3 GAEC standards, No evaluation of non-compliances, CY2008\nFLAT RATE\n2,00\nEUR\n– 7,01\n0,00\n– 7,01\nCross Compliance\n2009\nWeaknesses in the control of 3 GAEC standards, No evaluation of non-compliances, CY2009\nFLAT RATE\n2,00\nEUR\n– 11 429,91\n0,00\n– 11 429,91\nCross Compliance\n2010\nWeaknesses in the control of 3 GAEC standards, No evaluation of non-compliances, CY2009\nFLAT RATE\n2,00\nEUR\n– 545 748,71\n– 27 230,0\n– 518 518,71\nCross Compliance\n2011\nWeaknesses in the control of 3 GAEC standards, No evaluation of non-compliances, CY2009\nFLAT RATE\n2,00\nEUR\n12 204,8\n0,00\n12 204,8\nCross Compliance\n2012\nWeaknesses in the control of 3 GAEC standards, No evaluation of non-compliances, CY2009\nFLAT RATE\n2,00\nEUR\n– 2 481,32\n0,00\n– 2 481,32\nCross Compliance\n2010\nWeaknesses in the control of 3 GAEC standards, No evaluation of non-compliances, CY2010\nFLAT RATE\n2,00\nEUR\n– 21 226,11\n0,00\n– 21 226,11\nCross Compliance\n2011\nWeaknesses in the control of 3 GAEC standards, No evaluation of non-compliances, CY2010\nFLAT RATE\n2,00\nEUR\n– 609 258,8\n– 31 123,72\n– 578 135,08\nCross Compliance\n2012\nWeaknesses in the control of 3 GAEC standards, No evaluation of non-compliances, CY2010\nFLAT RATE\n2,00\nEUR\n– 601,27\n– 29,09\n– 572,18\nTotal BG:\nEUR\n– 2 218 314,88\n– 83 594,87\n– 2 134 720,01\nMember State\nMeasure\nFY\nReason\nType\nCorrection (%)\nCurrency\nAmount\nDeductions\nFinancial Impact\nDE\nCertification\n2012\nFinancial errors identified by the Certification Body\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 2 704,14\n0,00\n– 2 704,14\nCertification\n2013\nFinancial errors identified by the Certification Body\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 5 009,98\n0,00\n– 5 009,98\nCertification\n2010\nFinancial errors in the EAGF non-IACS population\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 594,81\n0,00\n– 594,81\nCross Compliance\n2010\nWeaknesses in SMR8, CY 2009\nONE OFF\n0,00\nEUR\n– 22 284,5\n0,00\n– 22 284,5\nCross Compliance\n2011\nWeaknesses in SMR8, CY 2010\nONE OFF\n0,00\nEUR\n– 22 210,8\n0,00\n– 22 210,8\nCross Compliance\n2012\nWeaknesses in SMR8, CY 2011\nONE OFF\n0,00\nEUR\n– 22 319,63\n0,00\n– 22 319,63\nTotal DE:\nEUR\n– 75 123,86\n0,00\n– 75 123,86\nMember State\nMeasure\nFY\nReason\nType\nCorrection (%)\nCurrency\nAmount\nDeductions\nFinancial Impact\nES\nDecoupled Direct Aids\n2011\nAdministrative controls, obvious error and sanctions, CY 2010\nONE OFF\n0,00\nEUR\n– 50 041,67\n0,00\n– 50 041,67\nDecoupled Direct Aids\n2012\nAdministrative controls, obvious error and sanctions, CY 2011\nONE OFF\n0,00\nEUR\n– 12 515,78\n0,00\n– 12 515,78\nDecoupled Direct Aids\n2012\nWeaknesses in OTSC and Incorrect use of obvious error, CY2011\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 22 206,87\n0,00\n– 22 206,87\nDecoupled Direct Aids\n2013\nWeaknesses in OTSC and incorrect use of obvious error, CY2012\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 40 281,07\n0,00\n– 40 281,07\nDecoupled Direct Aids\n2014\nWeaknesses in OTSC and incorrect use of obvious error, CY2013\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 29 939,13\n0,00\n– 29 939,13\nCertification\n2011\nEAGF non-IACS and EAFRD non-IACS known errors\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 24 113,66\n0,00\n– 24 113,66\nCertification\n2013\nEAGF non-IACS and EAFRD non-IACS known errors\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 19 304,02\n0,00\n– 19 304,02\nCertification\n2010\nEAGF non-IACS, EAFRD IACS and EAFRD non-IACS errors\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 14 177,94\n0,00\n– 14 177,94\nCertification\n2013\nErrors in substantive testing of EAGF non-IACS — Promotion in third countries' markets\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 58 964,77\n0,00\n– 58 964,77\nFruit and Vegetables — Withdrawals\n2007\nExpenditure for withdrawals declared by unduly recognised Producer Organisations\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 22 670,34\n0,00\n– 22 670,34\nFruit and Vegetables — Withdrawals\n2008\nExpenditure for withdrawals declared by unduly recognised Producer Organisations\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 31 384,64\n0,00\n– 31 384,64\nFruit and Vegetables — Operational Programmes\n2009\nFollow-up of irregularities\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 140 280,66\n– 3 283,15\n– 136 997,51\nFruit and Vegetables — Operational Programmes\n2010\nFollow-up of irregularities\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 152 769,22\n– 1 742,46\n– 151 026,76\nOther Direct Aid — POSEI\n2011\nIncomplete and unreliable animal identification register and animal movement register for sheep and goats\nFLAT RATE\n5,00\nEUR\n– 351 444,05\n0,00\n– 351 444,05\nOther Direct Aid — POSEI\n2012\nIncomplete and unreliable animal identification register and animal movement register for sheep and goats\nFLAT RATE\n10,00\nEUR\n– 710 003,66\n0,00\n– 710 003,66\nCertification\n2013\nInterests not declared on annex III amounts regarding EAGF\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 10 603,65\n0,00\n– 10 603,65\nCertification\n2012\nKnown error — fruits at the school\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 368 160,65\n0,00\n– 368 160,65\nCertification\n2011\nKnown error in EAGF IACS, established by the Certification Body\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 15 227,18\n0,00\n– 15 227,18\nClearance of Accounts — Conformity Clearance\n2013\nKnown error in the EAGF non-IACS population\nONE OFF\n0,00\nEUR\n– 332 847,54\n0,00\n– 332 847,54\nScrutiny of transactions\n2007\nLate control\nFLAT RATE\n0,50\nEUR\n– 159 906,98\n0,00\n– 159 906,98\nScrutiny of transactions\n2008\nLate control\nFLAT RATE\n0,50\nEUR\n– 221 243,51\n0,00\n– 221 243,51\nScrutiny of transactions\n2009\nLate control\nFLAT RATE\n0,50\nEUR\n– 430 938,4\n0,00\n– 430 938,4\nScrutiny of transactions\n2010\nLate control\nFLAT RATE\n0,50\nEUR\n– 455 897,33\n0,00\n– 455 897,33\nCross Compliance\n2011\nLate on-the-spot checks, CY 2010\nFLAT RATE\n2,00\nEUR\n– 88 001,88\n0,00\n– 88 001,88\nCross Compliance\n2012\nLate on-the-spot checks, CY2011\nFLAT RATE\n2,00\nEUR\n– 116 408,16\n0,00\n– 116 408,16\nFinancial audit — Late payments and payment deadlines\n2012\nlate payments\nONE OFF\n0,00\nEUR\n– 166 922,55\n0,00\n– 166 922,55\nCross Compliance\n2009\nLeniency of the sanctioning system, CY2008\nONE OFF\n0,00\nEUR\n– 61 969,91\n0,00\n– 61 969,91\nCross Compliance\n2010\nLimited scope of SMR5 checks, CY2009\nFLAT RATE\n2,00\nEUR\n– 524 524,29\n– 765,87\n– 523 758,42\nCross Compliance\n2011\nLimited scope of SMR5 checks, CY2009\nFLAT RATE\n2,00\nEUR\n– 1 103,55\n0,00\n– 1 103,55\nCross Compliance\n2012\nLimited scope of SMR5 checks, CY2009\nFLAT RATE\n2,00\nEUR\n– 137,44\n0,00\n– 137,44\nFruit and Vegetables — Operational Programmes\n2007\nOperational programme expenditure of unduly recognised Producer Organisations\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 39 929,5\n– 956,34\n– 38 973,16\nFruit and Vegetables — Operational Programmes\n2007\nOperational programme expenditure of unduly recognised Producer Organsations; follow-up of irregularities\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 527 067,84\n– 366 237,23\n– 160 830,61\nFruit and Vegetables — Operational Programmes\n2008\nOperational programme expenditure of unduly recognised Producer Organsations; follow– up of irregularities\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 661 289,41\n– 657 269,79\n– 4 019,62\nFruit and Vegetables — Citrus Processing\n2008\nUnduly recognised Producer Organsations; follow-up of irregularities; undue retentions from aid\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 722 075,92\n0,00\n– 722 075,92\nFruit and Vegetables — Citrus Processing\n2009\nUnduly recognised Producer Organsations; follow-up of irregularities; undue retentions from aid\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 132 032,9\n0,00\n– 132 032,9\nFruit and Vegetables — Citrus Processing\n2007\nWeaknesses of key controls\nFLAT RATE\n5,00\nEUR\n– 2 805 558,89\n0,00\n– 2 805 558,89\nFruit and Vegetables — Citrus Processing\n2008\nWeaknesses of key controls\nFLAT RATE\n5,00\nEUR\n– 3 167 422,82\n0,00\n– 3 167 422,82\nFruit and Vegetables — Citrus Processing\n2009\nWeaknesses of key controls\nFLAT RATE\n5,00\nEUR\n– 355 748,16\n0,00\n– 355 748,16\nFruit and Vegetables — Citrus Processing\n2010\nWeaknesses of key controls\nFLAT RATE\n5,00\nEUR\n589,09\n0,00\n589,09\nFruit and Vegetables — Citrus Processing\n2011\nWeaknesses of key controls\nFLAT RATE\n5,00\nEUR\n– 6 214,07\n0,00\n– 6 214,07\nFruit and Vegetables — Citrus Processing\n2012\nWeaknesses of key controls\nFLAT RATE\n5,00\nEUR\n– 488,00\n0,00\n– 488,00\nTotal ES:\nEUR\n– 13 051 228,92\n– 1 030 254,84\n– 12 020 974,08\nMember State\nMeasure\nFY\nReason\nType\nCorrection (%)\nCurrency\nAmount\nDeductions\nFinancial Impact\nFI\nCross Compliance\n2011\nPartial checks for one GAEC and SMR2, 3, 7, 8, 11 and 16-18, CY2010\nFLAT RATE\n2,00\nEUR\n– 1 077 273,25\n– 2 097,62\n– 1 075 175,63\nCross Compliance\n2012\nPartial checks for one GAEC and SMR2, 3, 7, 8, 11 and 16-18, CY2010\nFLAT RATE\n2,00\nEUR\n– 119,89\n0,00\n– 119,89\nCross Compliance\n2013\nPartial checks for one GAEC and SMR2, 3, 7, 8, 11 and 16-18, CY2010\nFLAT RATE\n2,00\nEUR\n– 19,01\n0,00\n– 19,01\nCross Compliance\n2012\nPartial checks for one GAEC and SMR2, 3, 7, 8, 11 and 16-18, CY2011\nFLAT RATE\n2,00\nEUR\n– 1 067 409,33\n– 2 917,12\n– 1 064 492,21\nCross Compliance\n2013\nPartial checks for one GAEC and SMR2, 3, 7, 8, 11 and 16-18, CY2011\nFLAT RATE\n2,00\nEUR\n– 29,81\n0,00\n– 29,81\nCross Compliance\n2013\nPartial checks for one GAEC and SMR2, 3, 7, 8, 11 and 16-18, CY2012\nFLAT RATE\n2,00\nEUR\n– 1 062 848,83\n0,00\n– 1 062 848,83\nTotal FI:\nEUR\n– 3 207 700,12\n– 5 014,74\n– 3 202 685,38\nMember State\nMeasure\nFY\nReason\nType\nCorrection (%)\nCurrency\nAmount\nDeductions\nFinancial Impact\nFR\nOther Direct Aid — Article 68-72 of Reg.73/2009\n2011\nDeficiencies at the level of administrative controls and in the identification and registration of animals\nFLAT RATE\n2,00\nEUR\n– 175 820,54\n0,00\n– 175 820,54\nOther Direct Aid — Article 68-72 of Reg.73/2009\n2011\nDeficiencies at the level of administrative controls and in the identification and registration of animals\nFLAT RATE\n5,00\nEUR\n– 5 684 962,0\n0,00\n– 5 684 962,0\nOther Direct Aid — Article 68-72 of Reg.73/2009\n2012\nDeficiencies at the level of administrative controls and in the identification and registration of animals\nFLAT RATE\n2,00\nEUR\n– 179 184,86\n0,00\n– 179 184,86\nOther Direct Aid — Article 68-72 of Reg.73/2009\n2012\nDeficiencies at the level of administrative controls and in the identification and registration of animals\nFLAT RATE\n5,00\nEUR\n– 5 736 924,65\n– 713 321,07\n– 5 023 603,58\nOther Direct Aid — Article 68-72 of Reg.73/2009\n2012\nDeficiencies at the level of administrative controls and in the identification and registration of animals\nONE OFF\n0,00\nEUR\n– 14 266 421,39\n0,00\n– 14 266 421,39\nOther Direct Aid — Article 68-72 of Reg.73/2009\n2013\nDeficiencies at the level of administrative controls and in the identification and registration of animals\nFLAT RATE\n2,00\nEUR\n– 247 189,52\n0,00\n– 247 189,52\nOther Direct Aid — Article 68-72 of Reg.73/2009\n2013\nDeficiencies at the level of administrative controls and in the identification and registration of animals\nFLAT RATE\n5,00\nEUR\n– 5 691 189,65\n– 613 734,8\n– 5 077 454,85\nOther Direct Aid — Article 68-72 of Reg.73/2009\n2013\nDeficiencies at the level of administrative controls and in the identification and registration of animals\nONE OFF\n0,00\nEUR\n– 12 274 696,0\n0,00\n– 12 274 696,0\nOther Direct Aid — Article 68-72 of Reg.73/2009\n2012\nDeficiency in the control system for bovine measures, claim year 2011\nFLAT RATE\n10,00\nEUR\n– 404 475,87\n0,00\n– 404 475,87\nFinancial audit — Overshooting\n2010\nexceeding of the financial ceiling\nONE OFF\n0,00\nEUR\n– 906 989,16\n0,00\n– 906 989,16\nClearance of Accounts — Conformity Clearance\n2011\nFinancial error (EAGF)\nONE OFF\n0,00\nEUR\n– 344 648,54\n0,00\n– 344 648,54\nOther Direct Aid — Article 68-72 of Reg.73/2009\n2011\nGrave deficiency in the control system for bovine measures, claim year 2010\nFLAT RATE\n25,00\nEUR\n– 1 033 771,02\n0,00\n– 1 033 771,02\nIrregularities\n2012\ninterests on debts for measure Pastry Butter\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 17 555,28\n0,00\n– 17 555,28\nIrregularities\n2012\ninterests on debts\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 221 128,43\n0,00\n– 221 128,43\nCertification\n2012\nknown error\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 21 332,97\n0,00\n– 21 332,97\nIrregularities\n2011\nknown error concerning non-application of interests on debts for measure Pastry Butter\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 88 238,74\n0,00\n– 88 238,74\nOther Direct Aid — Bovines\n2012\nLate notifications for suckler cow premium\nONE OFF\n0,00\nEUR\n– 1 040 875,6\n0,00\n– 1 040 875,6\nOther Direct Aid — Bovines\n2013\nLate notifications for suckler cow premium\nONE OFF\n0,00\nEUR\n– 800,31\n0,00\n– 800,31\nFinancial audit — Late payments and payment deadlines\n2010\nlate payment and ineligible expenditure\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 6 922 613,78\n– 6 922 613,78\n0,00\nCertification\n2011\nlate payments under the measure for refund of milk products\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 99 193,65\n0,00\n– 99 193,65\nIrregularities\n2011\nlump-sum correction for advance payments and guarantees\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 38 880,0\n0,00\n– 38 880,0\nIrregularities\n2011\nnon-timely issue of a recovery related to late submission of report\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 8 960,73\n0,00\n– 8 960,73\nMilk — Schoolmilk\n2009\nRegulatory reductions not imposed for late lodging of aid applications\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 99 865,21\n0,00\n– 99 865,21\nMilk — Schoolmilk\n2010\nRegulatory reductions not imposed for late lodging of aid applications\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 243 317,07\n0,00\n– 243 317,07\nMilk — Schoolmilk\n2011\nRegulatory reductions not imposed for late lodging of aid applications\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 227 242,67\n0,00\n– 227 242,67\nMilk — Schoolmilk\n2012\nRegulatory reductions not imposed for late lodging of aid applications\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 237 633,7\n0,00\n– 237 633,7\nMilk — Schoolmilk\n2013\nRegulatory reductions not imposed for late lodging of aid applications\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 213 989,71\n0,00\n– 213 989,71\nMilk — Schoolmilk\n2014\nRegulatory reductions not imposed for late lodging of aid applications\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 156 968,13\n0,00\n– 156 968,13\nCertification\n2012\nrestructuring of vineyards\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 16 575,06\n0,00\n– 16 575,06\nMilk — Schoolmilk\n2009\nSettlement of a previous correction concerning reduction for late lodging of aid applications for excluding double financial correction\nONE OFF\nEUR\n10 634,37\n0,00\n10 634,37\nMilk — Schoolmilk\n2010\nSettlement of a previous correction concerning reduction for late lodging of aid applications for excluding double financial correction\nONE OFF\nEUR\n13 312,71\n0,00\n13 312,71\nMilk — Schoolmilk\n2011\nSettlement of a previous correction concerning reduction for late lodging of aid applications for excluding double financial correction\nONE OFF\nEUR\n61,08\n0,00\n61,08\nMilk — Schoolmilk\n2012\nSettlement of a previous correction concerning reduction for late lodging of aid applications for excluding double financial correction\nONE OFF\nEUR\n17,99\n0,00\n17,99\nIrregularities\n2012\nunrecoverable debts from previous periods\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 232 549,69\n0,00\n– 232 549,69\nMilk — Schoolmilk\n2010\nweaknesses in administrative controls\nFLAT RATE\n5,00\nEUR\n– 326 272,47\n0,00\n– 326 272,47\nMilk — Schoolmilk\n2011\nweaknesses in administrative controls\nFLAT RATE\n5,00\nEUR\n– 625 154,44\n0,00\n– 625 154,44\nMilk — Schoolmilk\n2012\nweaknesses in administrative controls\nFLAT RATE\n5,00\nEUR\n– 654 928,98\n0,00\n– 654 928,98\nMilk — Schoolmilk\n2013\nweaknesses in administrative controls\nFLAT RATE\n5,00\nEUR\n– 341 329,21\n0,00\n– 341 329,21\nMilk — Schoolmilk\n2014\nweaknesses in administrative controls\nFLAT RATE\n5,00\nEUR\n– 2 121,16\n0,00\n– 2 121,16\nTotal FR:\nEUR\n– 58 759 774,04\n– 8 249 669,65\n– 50 510 104,39\nMember State\nMeasure\nFY\nReason\nType\nCorrection (%)\nCurrency\nAmount\nDeductions\nFinancial Impact\nGB\nDecoupled Direct Aids\n2011\nWeaknesses in the LPIS-GIS and in the on-the-spot checks\nFLAT RATE\n2,00\nEUR\n– 41 149 491,32\n0,00\n– 41 149 491,32\nOther Direct Aids\n2011\nWeaknesses in the LPIS-GIS and in the on-the-spot checks\nFLAT RATE\n2,00\nEUR\n– 152 102,7\n0,00\n– 152 102,7\nDecoupled Direct Aids\n2012\nWeaknesses in the LPIS-GIS and in the on-the-spot checks\nFLAT RATE\n2,00\nEUR\n– 41 173 119,81\n0,00\n– 41 173 119,81\nOther Direct Aids\n2012\nWeaknesses in the LPIS-GIS and in the on-the-spot checks\nFLAT RATE\n2,00\nEUR\n– 125 611,33\n0,00\n– 125 611,33\nDecoupled Direct Aids\n2011\nWeaknesses in updating LPIS maximum eligible area, CY 2010\nEXTRAPOLATED\n1,44\nEUR\n– 4 508 766,82\n– 4 508 766,82\n0,00\nDecoupled Direct Aids\n2012\nWeaknesses in updating LPIS maximum eligible area, CY 2010\nEXTRAPOLATED\n1,44\nEUR\n– 14 637,02\n– 14 637,02\n0,00\nDecoupled Direct Aids\n2013\nWeaknesses in updating LPIS maximum eligible area, CY 2010\nEXTRAPOLATED\n1,44\nEUR\n– 6 296,05\n– 6 296,05\n0,00\nDecoupled Direct Aids\n2012\nWeaknesses in updating LPIS maximum eligible area, CY 2011\nEXTRAPOLATED\n1,35\nEUR\n– 4 145 094,84\n– 4 145 094,84\n0,00\nDecoupled Direct Aids\n2013\nWeaknesses in updating LPIS maximum eligible area, CY 2011\nEXTRAPOLATED\n1,35\nEUR\n– 11 461,82\n– 11 461,82\n0,00\nDecoupled Direct Aids\n2013\nWeaknesses in updating LPIS maximum eligible area, CY 2012\nEXTRAPOLATED\n1,02\nEUR\n– 3 118 298,35\n– 3 118 298,35\n0,00\nTotal GB:\nEUR\n– 94 404 880,06\n– 11 804 554,9\n– 82 600 325,16\nMember State\nMeasure\nFY\nReason\nType\nCorrection (%)\nCurrency\nAmount\nDeductions\nFinancial Impact\nGR\nCertification\n2009\nAdministrative error\nONE OFF\n0,00\nEUR\n– 3 725 956,14\n0,00\n– 3 725 956,14\nDecoupled Direct Aids\n2010\nCY 2009, Weakness in administrative checks\nFLAT RATE\n5,00\nEUR\n– 1 258 341,84\n0,00\n– 1 258 341,84\nDecoupled Direct Aids\n2010\nCY 2009, Weakness in calculation of aids\nONE OFF\n0,00\nEUR\n– 834 150,17\n0,00\n– 834 150,17\nDecoupled Direct Aids\n2010\nCY 2009, Weakness in definition of permanent pastures\nFLAT RATE\n5,00\nEUR\n– 85 534 291,54\n– 10 905 970,63\n– 74 628 320,91\nDecoupled Direct Aids\n2011\nCY 2010, Risk analysis not effective\nONE OFF\n0,00\nEUR\n– 31 425 312,22\n0,00\n– 31 425 312,22\nDecoupled Direct Aids\n2011\nCY 2010, Weakness in calculation of aids\nONE OFF\n0,00\nEUR\n– 231 205,28\n0,00\n– 231 205,28\nDecoupled Direct Aids\n2011\nCY 2010, Weakness in definition of permanent pastures\nFLAT RATE\n25,00\nEUR\n– 96 766 888,08\n0,00\n– 96 766 888,08\nDecoupled Direct Aids\n2012\nCY 2011, Weakness in calculation of aids\nONE OFF\n0,00\nEUR\n– 210 599,35\n0,00\n– 210 599,35\nDecoupled Direct Aids\n2012\nCY 2011, Weakness in definition of permanent pastures\nFLAT RATE\n25,00\nEUR\n– 97 222 743,23\n0,00\n– 97 222 743,23\nCross Compliance\n2010\nIncomplete check for 3 SMR and 1 GAEC, CY 2009\nFLAT RATE\n2,00\nEUR\n– 4 885 840,27\n– 217 489,28\n– 4 668 350,99\nCross Compliance\n2011\nIncomplete check for 3 SMR and 1 GAEC, CY 2009\nFLAT RATE\n2,00\nEUR\n– 14 623,47\n4,01\n– 14 627,48\nCross Compliance\n2012\nIncomplete check for 3 SMR and 1 GAEC, CY 2009\nFLAT RATE\n2,00\nEUR\n2 123,88\n– 90,25\n2 214,13\nCross Compliance\n2009\nIncomplete check for 3 SMR and 1 GAEC, CY 2010\nFLAT RATE\n2,00\nEUR\n– 36 565,3\n0,00\n– 36 565,3\nCross Compliance\n2010\nIncomplete check for 3 SMR and 1 GAEC, CY 2010\nFLAT RATE\n2,00\nEUR\n– 767,75\n0,00\n– 767,75\nCross Compliance\n2011\nIncomplete check for 3 SMR and 1 GAEC, CY 2010\nFLAT RATE\n2,00\nEUR\n– 4 668 387,23\n– 256 891,02\n– 4 411 496,21\nCross Compliance\n2012\nIncomplete check for 3 SMR and 1 GAEC, CY 2010\nFLAT RATE\n2,00\nEUR\n– 1 762,62\n– 358,82\n– 1 403,8\nCross Compliance\n2013\nIncomplete check for 3 SMR and 1 GAEC, CY 2010\nFLAT RATE\n2,00\nEUR\n1 134,34\n0,00\n1 134,34\nCross Compliance\n2010\nIncomplete check for 3 SMR and 1 GAEC, CY 2011\nFLAT RATE\n2,00\nEUR\n– 8 798,19\n0,00\n– 8 798,19\nCross Compliance\n2011\nIncomplete check for 3 SMR and 1 GAEC, CY 2011\nFLAT RATE\n2,00\nEUR\n– 730,69\n0,00\n– 730,69\nCross Compliance\n2012\nIncomplete check for 3 SMR and 1 GAEC, CY 2011\nFLAT RATE\n2,00\nEUR\n– 4 628 045,9\n– 194 866,68\n– 4 433 179,22\nCross Compliance\n2013\nIncomplete check for 3 SMR and 1 GAEC, CY 2011\nFLAT RATE\n2,00\nEUR\n6 396,69\n0,00\n6 396,69\nCertification\n2010\nKnown error in EAGF IACS — counterfeited invoice — premium for special durum wheat\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 3 460,25\n0,00\n– 3 460,25\nFinancial audit — Late payments and payment deadlines\n2012\nLate payments\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 242 883,87\n– 242 883,87\n0,00\nFinancial audit — Late payments and payment deadlines\n2012\nLate payments\nONE OFF\nEUR\n0,00\n– 18 212,08\n18 212,08\nCross Compliance\n2010\nLeniency of the sanctioning system, 2009\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 314 226,9\n– 628,45\n– 313 598,45\nCross Compliance\n2011\nLeniency of the sanctioning system, 2010\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 311 191,72\n– 622,39\n– 310 569,33\nCross Compliance\n2012\nLeniency of the sanctioning system, 2011\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 165 476,02\n– 330,95\n– 165 145,07\nCertification\n2012\nMost Likely Error correction\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 474 888,32\n0,00\n– 474 888,32\nEntitlements\n2007\nReimbursement following the judgement of the European Court of Justice in case T-632/11\nFLAT RATE\n10,00\nEUR\n7 055 951,79\n7 055 951,79\n0,00\nTotal GR:\nEUR\n– 325 901 529,65\n– 4 782 388,62\n– 321 119 141,03\nMember State\nMeasure\nFY\nReason\nType\nCorrection (%)\nCurrency\nAmount\nDeductions\nFinancial Impact\nHU\nCross Compliance\n2011\nIneffective or partial checks for 4 SMRs, CY2010\nFLAT RATE\n2,00\nEUR\n– 1 615 567,11\n– 712,70\n– 1 614 854,41\nCross Compliance\n2012\nIneffective or partial checks for 4 SMRs, CY2011\nFLAT RATE\n2,00\nEUR\n– 1 600 343,9\n– 173,63\n– 1 600 170,27\nCross Compliance\n2010\nMinor non-compliances treated as tolerances, CY2009\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 266 654,0\n– 533,31\n– 266 120,69\nCross Compliance\n2011\nMinor non-compliances treated as tolerances, CY2010\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 287 746,0\n– 575,49\n– 287 170,51\nCross Compliance\n2012\nMinor non-compliances treated as tolerances, CY2011\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 14 540,0\n– 29,08\n– 14 510,92\nCross Compliance\n2009\nNo definition of a GAEC standard, CY2008\nFLAT RATE\n2,00\nEUR\n– 196 594,99\n– 4 936,38\n– 191 658,61\nCross Compliance\n2010\nNo definition of a GAEC standard, Ineffective or partial checks for 4 SMRs, CY2009\nFLAT RATE\n2,00\nEUR\n– 1 419 746,61\n0,00\n– 1 419 746,61\nOther Direct Aid — Article 68-72 of Reg.73/2009\n2011\nNon application of reductions and retroactive recoveries\nONE OFF\n0,00\nEUR\n– 192 496,94\n0,00\n– 192 496,94\nOther Direct Aid — Article 68-72 of Reg.73/2009\n2012\nNon application of reductions and retroactive recoveries\nONE OFF\n0,00\nEUR\n– 86 816,93\n0,00\n– 86 816,93\nOther Direct Aid — Article 68-72 of Reg.73/2009\n2013\nNon application of reductions and retroactive recoveries\nONE OFF\n0,00\nEUR\n– 167 077,38\n0,00\n– 167 077,38\nExport refunds- Live animals\n2011\nweakness on a key control concerning travel time related to transport of live animals\nFLAT RATE\n5,00\nEUR\n– 25 771,41\n0,00\n– 25 771,41\nExport refunds- Live animals\n2012\nweakness on a key control concerning travel time related to transport of live animals\nFLAT RATE\n5,00\nEUR\n– 7 923,51\n0,00\n– 7 923,51\nExport refunds- Live animals\n2013\nweakness on a key control concerning travel time related to transport of live animals\nFLAT RATE\n5,00\nEUR\n– 2 068,64\n0,00\n– 2 068,64\nExport refunds- Live animals\n2014\nweakness on a key control concerning travel time related to transport of live animals\nFLAT RATE\n5,00\nEUR\n– 940,87\n0,00\n– 940,87\nTotal HU:\nEUR\n– 5 884 288,29\n– 6 960,59\n– 5 877 327,7\nMember State\nMeasure\nFY\nReason\nType\nCorrection (%)\nCurrency\nAmount\nDeductions\nFinancial Impact\nIE\nIrregularities\n2012\ninterest following late notifications to debtors\nONE OFF\n0,00\nEUR\n– 24 310,0\n0,00\n– 24 310,0\nTotal IE:\nEUR\n– 24 310,0\n0,00\n– 24 310,0\nMember State\nMeasure\nFY\nReason\nType\nCorrection (%)\nCurrency\nAmount\nDeductions\nFinancial Impact\nIT\nDecoupled Direct Aids\n2009\nEligibility of permanent pasture\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 3 291 735,88\n0,00\n– 3 291 735,88\nDecoupled Direct Aids\n2010\nEligibility of permanent pasture\nFLAT RATE\n5,00\nEUR\n– 3 244 105,28\n0,00\n– 3 244 105,28\nDecoupled Direct Aids\n2011\nEligibility of permanent pasture\nFLAT RATE\n5,00\nEUR\n– 2 708 898,96\n0,00\n– 2 708 898,96\nDecoupled Direct Aids\n2009\nIncorrect application of 0,1Ha tolerance\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 104 511,69\n0,00\n– 104 511,69\nDecoupled Direct Aids\n2010\nIncorrect application of 0,1Ha tolerance\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 35 336,77\n0,00\n– 35 336,77\nDecoupled Direct Aids\n2010\nLack of procedure for intentional non-compliance\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 51 346,95\n0,00\n– 51 346,95\nTotal IT:\nEUR\n– 9 435 935,53\n0,00\n– 9 435 935,53\nMember State\nMeasure\nFY\nReason\nType\nCorrection (%)\nCurrency\nAmount\nDeductions\nFinancial Impact\nLU\nCross Compliance\n2010\nWeaknesses in controls and sanctions for many SMR, CY2009\nFLAT RATE\n5,00\nEUR\n– 172 829,19\n0,00\n– 172 829,19\nCross Compliance\n2011\nWeaknesses in controls and sanctions for many SMR, CY2009\nFLAT RATE\n5,00\nEUR\n– 119,86\n0,00\n– 119,86\nCross Compliance\n2012\nWeaknesses in controls and sanctions for many SMR, CY2009\nFLAT RATE\n5,00\nEUR\n– 139,73\n0,00\n– 139,73\nCross Compliance\n2009\nWeaknesses in controls and sanctions for many SMR, CY2010\nFLAT RATE\n5,00\nEUR\n– 525,20\n0,00\n– 525,20\nCross Compliance\n2010\nWeaknesses in controls and sanctions for many SMR, CY2010\nFLAT RATE\n5,00\nEUR\n– 9,14\n– 9,14\n0,00\nCross Compliance\n2011\nWeaknesses in controls and sanctions for many SMR, CY2010\nFLAT RATE\n5,00\nEUR\n– 170 803,1\n0,00\n– 170 803,1\nCross Compliance\n2012\nWeaknesses in controls and sanctions for many SMR, CY2010\nFLAT RATE\n5,00\nEUR\n– 559,72\n0,00\n– 559,72\nCross Compliance\n2013\nWeaknesses in controls and sanctions for many SMR, CY2010\nFLAT RATE\n5,00\nEUR\n– 9,94\n0,00\n– 9,94\nCross Compliance\n2010\nWeaknesses in controls for some SMR, CY2011\nFLAT RATE\n2,00\nEUR\n– 11,08\n0,00\n– 11,08\nCross Compliance\n2012\nWeaknesses in controls for some SMR, CY2011\nFLAT RATE\n2,00\nEUR\n– 68 099,37\n0,00\n– 68 099,37\nCross Compliance\n2013\nWeaknesses in controls for some SMR, CY2011\nFLAT RATE\n2,00\nEUR\n– 22,97\n0,00\n– 22,97\nCross Compliance\n2011\nWeaknesses in controls for some SMR, CY2012\nFLAT RATE\n2,00\nEUR\n– 4,41\n0,00\n– 4,41\nCross Compliance\n2013\nWeaknesses in controls for some SMR, CY2012\nFLAT RATE\n2,00\nEUR\n– 67 282,23\n0,00\n– 67 282,23\nTotal LU:\nEUR\n– 480 415,94\n– 9,14\n– 480 406,8\nMember State\nMeasure\nFY\nReason\nType\nCorrection (%)\nCurrency\nAmount\nDeductions\nFinancial Impact\nNL\nCross Compliance\n2010\nLeniency of the sanctioning system, CY 2009\nONE OFF\n0,00\nEUR\n– 336 738,0\n– 673,47\n– 336 064,53\nCross Compliance\n2011\nLeniency of the sanctioning system, CY 2010\nONE OFF\n0,00\nEUR\n– 404 673,0\n– 809,34\n– 403 863,66\nCross Compliance\n2012\nLeniency of the sanctioning system, CY 2011\nONE OFF\n0,00\nEUR\n– 231 249,0\n– 462,51\n– 230 786,49\nCross Compliance\n2011\nPartial control of four SMRs, CY 2010\nFLAT RATE\n2,00\nEUR\n– 1 632 040,68\n– 1 500,0\n– 1 630 540,68\nCross Compliance\n2012\nPartial control of four SMRs, CY 2010\nFLAT RATE\n2,00\nEUR\n– 6 702,82\n– 182,32\n– 6 520,5\nCross Compliance\n2012\nPartial control of four SMRs, CY 2011\nFLAT RATE\n2,00\nEUR\n– 1 631 326,51\n0,00\n– 1 631 326,51\nCross Compliance\n2010\nTwo GAEC missing, partial control of three SMRs, CY 2009\nFLAT RATE\n2,00\nEUR\n– 1 607 697,98\n– 10 515,98\n– 1 597 182,0\nCross Compliance\n2011\nTwo GAEC missing, partial control of three SMRs, CY 2009\nFLAT RATE\n2,00\nEUR\n– 15,53\n0,00\n– 15,53\nCross Compliance\n2012\nTwo GAEC missing, partial control of three SMRs, CY 2009\nFLAT RATE\n2,00\nEUR\n– 358,24\n0,00\n– 358,24\nTotal NL:\nEUR\n– 5 850 801,76\n– 14 143,62\n– 5 836 658,14\nMember State\nMeasure\nFY\nReason\nType\nCorrection (%)\nCurrency\nAmount\nDeductions\nFinancial Impact\nPL\nFruit and Vegetables — Operational Programmes\n2009\nOn-the-spot control weakness — insufficient or inadequate quality of control\nFLAT RATE\n10,00\nEUR\n– 31 264,18\n0,00\n– 31 264,18\nFruit and Vegetables — Operational Programmes\n2010\nOn-the-spot control weakness — insufficient or inadequate quality of control\nFLAT RATE\n10,00\nEUR\n– 29 697,91\n0,00\n– 29 697,91\nFruit and Vegetables — Operational Programmes\n2011\nOn-the-spot control weakness — insufficient or inadequate quality of control\nFLAT RATE\n10,00\nEUR\n– 18 292,77\n0,00\n– 18 292,77\nFruit and Vegetables — Operational Programmes\n2012\nOn-the-spot control weakness — insufficient or inadequate quality of control\nFLAT RATE\n10,00\nEUR\n– 63 191,19\n0,00\n– 63 191,19\nFruit and Vegetables — Pre-recognised Producer Groups\n2009\nOn-the-spot control weakness — insufficient or inadequate quality of control\nFLAT RATE\n10,00\nEUR\n– 2 931 872,36\n0,00\n– 2 931 872,36\nFruit and Vegetables — Pre-recognised Producer Groups\n2010\nOn-the-spot control weakness — insufficient or inadequate quality of control\nFLAT RATE\n10,00\nEUR\n– 9 080 094,98\n0,00\n– 9 080 094,98\nFruit and Vegetables — Pre-recognised Producer Groups\n2011\nOn-the-spot control weakness — insufficient or inadequate quality of control\nFLAT RATE\n10,00\nEUR\n– 17 373 186,08\n0,00\n– 17 373 186,08\nFruit and Vegetables — Pre-recognised Producer Groups\n2012\nOn-the-spot control weakness — insufficient or inadequate quality of control\nFLAT RATE\n10,00\nEUR\n– 25 989 900,32\n0,00\n– 25 989 900,32\nCross Compliance\n2010\n1 GAEC not adequately defined and not controlled, CY 2009\nFLAT RATE\n2,00\nEUR\n– 3 689 271,34\n– 79,06\n– 3 689 192,28\nCross Compliance\n2011\n1 GAEC not adequately defined and not controlled, CY 2009\nFLAT RATE\n2,00\nEUR\n– 3 213,44\n0,00\n– 3 213,44\nCross Compliance\n2012\n1 GAEC not adequately defined and not controlled, CY 2009\nFLAT RATE\n2,00\nEUR\n164,81\n0,00\n164,81\nCross Compliance\n2009\n3 GAEC not defined or controlled, incorrect application of repetition, CY 2008\nFLAT RATE\n2,00\nEUR\n– 3 120 835,31\n– 29 229,92\n– 3 091 605,39\nCross Compliance\n2010\n3 GAEC not defined or controlled, incorrect application of repetition, CY 2008\nFLAT RATE\n2,00\nEUR\n– 2 453,25\n0,00\n– 2 453,25\nCross Compliance\n2011\n3 GAEC not defined or controlled, incorrect application of repetition, CY 2008\nFLAT RATE\n2,00\nEUR\n– 330,26\n0,00\n– 330,26\nCertification\n2012\nNon-respect of payment deadlines\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 8 334,38\n– 8 334,38\n0,00\nTotal PL:\nEUR\n– 62 341 772,96\n– 37 643,36\n– 62 304 129,6\nMember State\nMeasure\nFY\nReason\nType\nCorrection (%)\nCurrency\nAmount\nDeductions\nFinancial Impact\nPL\nCross Compliance\n2010\n1 GAEC not adequately defined and not controlled, CY 2009\nFLAT RATE\n2,00\nPLN\n0,00\n– 180,84\n180,84\nCross Compliance\n2010\n3 GAEC not defined or controlled, incorrect application of repetition, CY 2008\nFLAT RATE\n2,00\nPLN\n0,00\n– 0,12\n0,12\nTotal PL:\nPLN\n0,00\n– 180,96\n180,96\nMember State\nMeasure\nFY\nReason\nType\nCorrection (%)\nCurrency\nAmount\nDeductions\nFinancial Impact\nPT\nFlax and Hemp\n2001\nGravely deficient control system\nFLAT RATE\n25,00\nEUR\n– 501 445,57\n0,00\n– 501 445,57\nIrregularities\n2007\nincorrect amount of interest in Annex III for all those cases cleared under the 50/50-rule for FY2006\nONE OFF\n0,00\nEUR\n– 159 635,31\n0,00\n– 159 635,31\nIrregularities\n2010\nincorrect amount of interest in Annex III for all those cases cleared under the 50/50-rule for FY2007\nONE OFF\n0,00\nEUR\n– 9 699,57\n0,00\n– 9 699,57\nIrregularities\n2010\nincorrect amount of interest in Annex III for all those cases cleared under the 50/50-rule for FY2008\nONE OFF\n0,00\nEUR\n– 9 579,02\n0,00\n– 9 579,02\nIrregularities\n2007\nincorrect year of PACA for cases which were cleared under 50/50 rule, or declared as irrecoverable within 4/8 years for FY2006\nONE OFF\n0,00\nEUR\n– 15 985,64\n0,00\n– 15 985,64\nIrregularities\n2010\nincorrect year of PACA for cases which were cleared under 50/50 rule, or declared as irrecoverable within 4/8 years for FY2008\nONE OFF\n0,00\nEUR\n– 7 183,06\n0,00\n– 7 183,06\nIrregularities\n2010\nincorrect year of PACA for cases which were cleared under 50/50 rule, or declared as irrecoverable within 4/8 years for FY2009\nONE OFF\n0,00\nEUR\n– 106 753,07\n0,00\n– 106 753,07\nOther Direct Aid — Bovines\n2011\nIrregularities concerning the eligibility of unidentified animals and concerning control of potentially eligible animals for slaughter premium\nONE OFF\n0,00\nEUR\n– 286 265,67\n0,00\n– 286 265,67\nOther Direct Aid — Bovines\n2012\nIrregularities concerning the eligibility of unidentified animals and concerning control of potentially eligible animals for slaughter premium\nONE OFF\n0,00\nEUR\n– 2 112,59\n0,00\n– 2 112,59\nOther Direct Aid — Ewe and Goats\n2010\nNoncompliance with the regular requirements (electronic ID) and late on-the-spot checks\nFLAT RATE\n5,00\nEUR\n– 1 364 355,53\n0,00\n– 1 364 355,53\nOther Direct Aid — Ewe and Goats\n2011\nNoncompliance with the regular requirements (electronic ID) and late on-the-spot checks\nFLAT RATE\n5,00\nEUR\n– 12 406,16\n0,00\n– 12 406,16\nOther Direct Aid — Ewe and Goats\n2012\nNoncompliance with the regular requirements (electronic ID) and late on-the-spot checks\nFLAT RATE\n5,00\nEUR\n– 875,95\n0,00\n– 875,95\nOther Direct Aid — Ewe and Goats\n2012\nNoncompliance with the regular requirements (electronic ID) and late on-the-spot checks\nFLAT RATE\n25,00\nEUR\n– 6 882 369,01\n0,00\n– 6 882 369,01\nOther Direct Aids\n2010\nWeaknesses in LPIS, Coupled Aids CY 2009\nFLAT RATE\n10,00\nEUR\n– 3 104 351,6\n– 7 964,71\n– 3 096 386,89\nOther Direct Aids\n2011\nWeaknesses in LPIS, Coupled Aids, CY 2009\nFLAT RATE\n10,00\nEUR\n– 22 262,51\n0,00\n– 22 262,51\nOther Direct Aids\n2012\nWeaknesses in LPIS, Coupled Aids, CY 2009\nFLAT RATE\n10,00\nEUR\n– 397,61\n0,00\n– 397,61\nOther Direct Aids\n2011\nWeaknesses in LPIS, Coupled Aids, CY 2010\nFLAT RATE\n10,00\nEUR\n– 3 075 736,7\n0,00\n– 3 075 736,7\nOther Direct Aids\n2012\nWeaknesses in LPIS, Coupled Aids, CY 2010\nFLAT RATE\n10,00\nEUR\n– 5 970,81\n0,00\n– 5 970,81\nOther Direct Aids\n2012\nWeaknesses in LPIS, Coupled Aids, CY 2011\nFLAT RATE\n10,00\nEUR\n– 3 021 960,91\n0,00\n– 3 021 960,91\nDecoupled Direct Aids\n2010\nWeaknesses in LPIS, CY 2009\nFLAT RATE\n10,00\nEUR\n– 38 487 387,22\n0,00\n– 38 487 387,22\nDecoupled Direct Aids\n2011\nWeaknesses in LPIS, CY 2009\nFLAT RATE\n10,00\nEUR\n– 76 959,21\n0,00\n– 76 959,21\nDecoupled Direct Aids\n2012\nWeaknesses in LPIS, CY 2009\nFLAT RATE\n10,00\nEUR\n– 21 658,3\n0,00\n– 21 658,3\nOther Direct Aid — Article 68-72 of Reg.73/2009\n2011\nWeaknesses in LPIS, CY 2010\nFLAT RATE\n5,00\nEUR\n– 596 448,77\n0,00\n– 596 448,77\nDecoupled Direct Aids\n2011\nWeaknesses in LPIS, CY 2010\nFLAT RATE\n10,00\nEUR\n– 39 743 230,07\n0,00\n– 39 743 230,07\nOther Direct Aid — Article 68-72 of Reg.73/2009\n2012\nWeaknesses in LPIS, CY 2010\nFLAT RATE\n5,00\nEUR\n– 14 755,3\n0,00\n– 14 755,3\nDecoupled Direct Aids\n2012\nWeaknesses in LPIS, CY 2010\nFLAT RATE\n10,00\nEUR\n– 79 741,0\n0,00\n– 79 741,0\nOther Direct Aid — Article 68-72 of Reg.73/2009\n2012\nWeaknesses in LPIS, CY 2011\nFLAT RATE\n5,00\nEUR\n– 506 205,32\n0,00\n– 506 205,32\nDecoupled Direct Aids\n2012\nWeaknesses in LPIS, CY 2011\nFLAT RATE\n10,00\nEUR\n– 39 273 425,47\n0,00\n– 39 273 425,47\nTotal PT:\nEUR\n– 137 389 156,95\n– 7 964,71\n– 137 381 192,24\nMember State\nMeasure\nFY\nReason\nType\nCorrection (%)\nCurrency\nAmount\nDeductions\nFinancial Impact\nSE\nCertification\n2011\nAccounting correction\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 162 010,82\n0,00\n– 162 010,82\nCross Compliance\n2010\nReduce scope of control for SMR2, CY 2009\nFLAT RATE\n2,00\nEUR\n– 935 582,59\n– 923,22\n– 934 659,37\nCross Compliance\n2011\nReduce scope of control for SMR2, CY 2010\nFLAT RATE\n2,00\nEUR\n– 937 501,48\n0,00\n– 937 501,48\nCross Compliance\n2012\nReduce scope of control for SMR2, CY 2011\nFLAT RATE\n2,00\nEUR\n– 922 366,51\n0,00\n– 922 366,51\nTotal SE:\nEUR\n– 2 957 461,4\n– 923,22\n– 2 956 538,18\nMember State\nMeasure\nFY\nReason\nType\nCorrection (%)\nCurrency\nAmount\nDeductions\nFinancial Impact\nSI\nCertification\n2013\nEAGF IACS known errors\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 285,33\n0,00\n– 285,33\nTotal SI:\nEUR\n– 285,33\n0,00\n– 285,33\nMember State\nMeasure\nFY\nReason\nType\nCorrection (%)\nCurrency\nAmount\nDeductions\nFinancial Impact\nSK\nCertification\n2012\nExtrapolated error in the EAGF non-IACS population\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 195 952,67\n0,00\n– 195 952,67\nCertification\n2006\nKnown error in the EAGF non-IACS\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 96 733,42\n0,00\n– 96 733,42\nDecoupled Direct Aids\n2009\nNon increase of the sample and absence of retroactive recoveries — claim year 2008\nONE OFF\n0,00\nEUR\n– 183 679,07\n0,00\n– 183 679,07\nDecoupled Direct Aids\n2010\nNon increase of the sample and absence of retroactive recoveries — claim year 2009\nONE OFF\n0,00\nEUR\n– 652 124,2\n0,00\n– 652 124,2\nOther Direct Aid — Article 68-72 of Reg.73/2009\n2011\nOn-the-spot check weaknesses\nFLAT RATE\n2,00\nEUR\n– 160 973,2\n0,00\n– 160 973,2\nOther Direct Aid — Article 68-72 of Reg.73/2009\n2012\nOn-the-spot check weaknesses\nFLAT RATE\n2,00\nEUR\n– 212 310,92\n0,00\n– 212 310,92\nOther Direct Aid — Article 68-72 of Reg.73/2009\n2013\nOn-the-spot check weaknesses\nFLAT RATE\n2,00\nEUR\n– 133,03\n0,00\n– 133,03\nTotal SK:\nEUR\n– 1 501 906,51\n0,00\n– 1 501 906,51\nCurrency\nAmount\nDeductions\nFinancial Impact\nEUR\n– 725 462 955,02\n– 26 198 272,98\n– 699 264 682,04\nPLN\n0,00\n– 180,96\n180,96",
  "extent": "E+W+S+N.I.",
  "status": null,
  "version": "current",
  "annotations": [],
  "outstanding_effects": [],
  "provenance": {
    "source": "legislation.gov.uk",
    "source_url": "https://www.legislation.gov.uk/eudn/2015/1119/annex/division/3",
    "retrieved_at": "2026-11-01T15:14:18.333981+00:00"
  },
  "licence": "Open Government Licence v3.0",
  "licence_url": "https://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/version/3/",
  "attribution": "Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Source: legislation.gov.uk, The National Archives."
}