{
  "url": "https://openlegislation.uk/eu-decision-2015-1119/annex/division-4",
  "json_url": "https://openlegislation.uk/eu-decision-2015-1119/annex/division-4.json",
  "legislation": "eudn/2015/1119",
  "legislation_title": "Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2015/1119 of 22 June 2015 excluding from European Union financing certain expenditure incurred by the Member States under the European Agricultural Guarantee Fund (EAGF) and under the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) (notified under document C(2015) 4076) (only the Bulgarian, Spanish, Danish, German, Estonian, Greek, English, French, Italian, Lithuanian, Hungarian, Dutch, Polish, Portuguese, Romanian, Slovak, Slovenian, Finnish, Swedish texts are authentic)",
  "legislation_url": "https://openlegislation.uk/eu-decision-2015-1119",
  "path": "annex/division/4",
  "kind": "division",
  "number": null,
  "heading": "Budget Item: 6711",
  "text": "Member State\nMeasure\nFY\nReason\nType\nCorrection (%)\nCurrency\nAmount\nDeductions\nFinancial Impact\nBE\nCertification\n2010\ncorrection for the most likely errors\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 849 182,72\n0,00\n– 849 182,72\nCertification\n2011\nmost likely error and administrative errors\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 222 353,9\n0,00\n– 222 353,9\nCertification\n2012\nmost likely error (EARDF non-IACS)\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 268 140,0\n0,00\n– 268 140,0\nTotal BE:\nEUR\n– 1 339 676,62\n0,00\n– 1 339 676,62\nMember State\nMeasure\nFY\nReason\nType\nCorrection (%)\nCurrency\nAmount\nDeductions\nFinancial Impact\nBG\nCross Compliance\n2012\nNo evaluation of non-compliances, weakness in risk analysis CY2011\nFLAT RATE\n2,00\nEUR\n– 69 011,49\n0,00\n– 69 011,49\nCross Compliance\n2009\nWeaknesses in the control of 3 GAEC standards, No evaluation of non-compliances, CY2008\nFLAT RATE\n2,00\nEUR\n– 16 815,22\n– 1 493,59\n– 15 321,63\nCross Compliance\n2010\nWeaknesses in the control of 3 GAEC standards, No evaluation of non-compliances, CY2008\nFLAT RATE\n2,00\nEUR\n2 594,34\n0,00\n2 594,34\nCross Compliance\n2011\nWeaknesses in the control of 3 GAEC standards, No evaluation of non-compliances, CY2008\nFLAT RATE\n2,00\nEUR\n374,06\n0,00\n374,06\nCross Compliance\n2010\nWeaknesses in the control of 3 GAEC standards, No evaluation of non-compliances, CY2009\nFLAT RATE\n2,00\nEUR\n– 42 258,52\n– 2 078,57\n– 40 179,95\nCross Compliance\n2011\nWeaknesses in the control of 3 GAEC standards, No evaluation of non-compliances, CY2009\nFLAT RATE\n2,00\nEUR\n703,39\n0,00\n703,39\nCross Compliance\n2012\nWeaknesses in the control of 3 GAEC standards, No evaluation of non-compliances, CY2009\nFLAT RATE\n2,00\nEUR\n790,42\n0,00\n790,42\nCross Compliance\n2011\nWeaknesses in the control of 3 GAEC standards, No evaluation of non-compliances, CY2010\nFLAT RATE\n2,00\nEUR\n– 42 144,65\n– 28 767,01\n– 13 377,64\nCross Compliance\n2012\nWeaknesses in the control of 3 GAEC standards, No evaluation of non-compliances, CY2010\nFLAT RATE\n2,00\nEUR\n1 105,49\n55,28\n1 050,21\nTotal BG:\nEUR\n– 164 662,18\n– 32 283,89\n– 132 378,29\nMember State\nMeasure\nFY\nReason\nType\nCorrection (%)\nCurrency\nAmount\nDeductions\nFinancial Impact\nDE\nCertification\n2010\nerrors found in the procedure of clearance of accounts for financial year 2010\nONE OFF\n0,00\nEUR\n– 155 205,74\n0,00\n– 155 205,74\nCertification\n2012\nFinancial errors identified by the Certification Body\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 2 168,71\n0,00\n– 2 168,71\nCertification\n2013\nFinancial errors identified by the Certification Body\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 2 552,58\n0,00\n– 2 552,58\nCertification\n2011\nFinancial errors in the EAFRD non-IACS population\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 1 281 363,06\n0,00\n– 1 281 363,06\nCertification\n2012\nFinancial errors in the EAFRD non-IACS population\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 468 402,54\n– 1 572,93\n– 466 829,61\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, non area related measures)\n2011\nWeakness in the on-the-spot checks\nFLAT RATE\n5,00\nEUR\n– 139 742,7\n0,00\n– 139 742,7\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, non area related measures)\n2012\nWeakness in the on-the-spot checks\nFLAT RATE\n2,00\nEUR\n– 57 671,91\n0,00\n– 57 671,91\nTotal DE:\nEUR\n– 2 107 107,24\n– 1 572,93\n– 2 105 534,31\nMember State\nMeasure\nFY\nReason\nType\nCorrection (%)\nCurrency\nAmount\nDeductions\nFinancial Impact\nDK\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 1+3 — others (2007-2013)\n2008\naid paid in excess of the 60 % aid intensity rate stipulated in the Rural Development Programme 2007- 2013\nONE OFF\n0,00\nEUR\n– 740 432,69\n0,00\n– 740 432,69\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 1+3 — others (2007-2013)\n2009\naid paid in excess of the 60 % aid intensity rate stipulated in the Rural Development Programme 2007- 2013\nONE OFF\n0,00\nEUR\n– 1 131 207,95\n0,00\n– 1 131 207,95\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 1+3 — others (2007-2013)\n2010\naid paid in excess of the 60 % aid intensity rate stipulated in the Rural Development Programme 2007- 2013\nONE OFF\n0,00\nEUR\n– 159 254,22\n0,00\n– 159 254,22\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 1+3 — others (2007-2013)\n2008\nInsufficient checks under Article 26.2 (d) of Regulation (EC) 1975/2006\nFLAT RATE\n5,00\nEUR\n– 67 021,43\n– 24 903,33\n– 42 118,1\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 1+3 — others (2007-2013)\n2009\nInsufficient checks under Article 26.2 (d) of Regulation (EC) 1975/2006\nFLAT RATE\n5,00\nEUR\n– 178 668,72\n– 56 560,4\n– 122 108,32\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 1+3 — others (2007-2013)\n2010\nInsufficient checks under Article 26.2 (d) of Regulation (EC) 1975/2006\nFLAT RATE\n5,00\nEUR\n– 24 190,83\n– 7 962,71\n– 16 228,12\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 1+3 — Investment orientated measures (2007-2013)\n2009\nnon-eligible expenditure\nONE OFF\n0,00\nEUR\n– 44 363,28\n0,00\n– 44 363,28\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 1+3 — Investment orientated measures (2007-2013)\n2010\nnon-eligible expenditure\nONE OFF\n0,00\nEUR\n– 23 894,92\n0,00\n– 23 894,92\nTotal DK:\nEUR\n– 2 369 034,04\n– 89 426,44\n– 2 279 607,6\nMember State\nMeasure\nFY\nReason\nType\nCorrection (%)\nCurrency\nAmount\nDeductions\nFinancial Impact\nEE\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 4 LEADER (2007-2013)\n2012\nWeakness detected for file no 430010782587 (technical specifications modified vs the 3 offers available in the application)\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 30 677,59\n0,00\n– 30 677,59\nTotal EE:\nEUR\n– 30 677,59\n0,00\n– 30 677,59\nMember State\nMeasure\nFY\nReason\nType\nCorrection (%)\nCurrency\nAmount\nDeductions\nFinancial Impact\nES\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 4 LEADER (2007-2013)\n2011\nCash payments accepted for amounts higher than EUR 3000\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 3 429,35\n0,00\n– 3 429,35\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 1 — Measures with flat rate support (2007-2013)\n2011\nDAS 2012 follow up\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 54 678,48\n0,00\n– 54 678,48\nCertification\n2013\nEAFRD non-IACS error calculated by Most Likely Error\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 13 102,05\n0,00\n– 13 102,05\nCertification\n2013\nEAFRD non-IACS random errors and EAGF control statistics\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 292 416,33\n– 243 453,83\n– 48 962,5\nCertification\n2013\nEAGF and EAFRD errors in annex III, known errors and Most Likely Error\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 22 195,17\n0,00\n– 22 195,17\nCertification\n2013\nEAGF non-IACS and EAFRD non-IACS known errors\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 26 105,45\n0,00\n– 26 105,45\nClearance of accounts — Financial Clearance\n2009\nErrors in the measure 123 (Adding value to agricultural and forestry products)\nONE OFF\n0,00\nEUR\n– 660 118,11\n0,00\n– 660 118,11\nCertification\n2013\nInterests not declared on annex III amounts regarding EAFRD\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 3 524,23\n0,00\n– 3 524,23\nCertification\n2010\nKnown error (EAFRD non-IACS)\nONE OFF\n0,00\nEUR\n– 10 900,75\n0,00\n– 10 900,75\nCross Compliance\n2010\nLimited scope of SMR5 checks, CY2009\nFLAT RATE\n2,00\nEUR\n– 21 359,77\n0,00\n– 21 359,77\nCross Compliance\n2011\nLimited scope of SMR5 checks, CY2009\nFLAT RATE\n2,00\nEUR\n– 991,68\n0,00\n– 991,68\nCross Compliance\n2012\nLimited scope of SMR5 checks, CY2009\nFLAT RATE\n2,00\nEUR\n– 17,03\n0,00\n– 17,03\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 4 LEADER (2007-2013)\n2011\nMissing checks on reasonableness of costs\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 200 000,0\n0,00\n– 200 000,0\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 4 LEADER (2007-2013)\n2012\nMissing checks on reasonableness of costs\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 494 665,62\n0,00\n– 494 665,62\nTotal ES:\nEUR\n– 1 803 504,02\n– 243 453,83\n– 1 560 050,19\nMember State\nMeasure\nFY\nReason\nType\nCorrection (%)\nCurrency\nAmount\nDeductions\nFinancial Impact\nFI\nCross Compliance\n2011\nPartial checks for one GAEC and SMR2, 3, 7, 8, 11 and 16-18, CY2010\nFLAT RATE\n2,00\nEUR\n– 117 417,02\n– 1 255,65\n– 116 161,37\nCross Compliance\n2012\nPartial checks for one GAEC and SMR2, 3, 7, 8, 11 and 16-18, CY2010\nFLAT RATE\n2,00\nEUR\n296,44\n0,00\n296,44\nCross Compliance\n2013\nPartial checks for one GAEC and SMR2, 3, 7, 8, 11 and 16-18, CY2010\nFLAT RATE\n2,00\nEUR\n119,20\n0,00\n119,20\nCross Compliance\n2011\nPartial checks for one GAEC and SMR2, 3, 7, 8, 11 and 16-18, CY2011\nFLAT RATE\n2,00\nEUR\n– 322 314,3\n0,00\n– 322 314,3\nCross Compliance\n2012\nPartial checks for one GAEC and SMR2, 3, 7, 8, 11 and 16-18, CY2011\nFLAT RATE\n2,00\nEUR\n– 124 630,16\n– 1 116,39\n– 123 513,77\nCross Compliance\n2013\nPartial checks for one GAEC and SMR2, 3, 7, 8, 11 and 16-18, CY2011\nFLAT RATE\n2,00\nEUR\n237,29\n0,00\n237,29\nCross Compliance\n2012\nPartial checks for one GAEC and SMR2, 3, 7, 8, 11 and 16-18, CY2012\nFLAT RATE\n2,00\nEUR\n– 322 673,61\n0,00\n– 322 673,61\nCross Compliance\n2013\nPartial checks for one GAEC and SMR2, 3, 7, 8, 11 and 16-18, CY2012\nFLAT RATE\n2,00\nEUR\n– 148 165,33\n0,00\n– 148 165,33\nTotal FI:\nEUR\n– 1 034 547,49\n– 2 372,04\n– 1 032 175,45\nMember State\nMeasure\nFY\nReason\nType\nCorrection (%)\nCurrency\nAmount\nDeductions\nFinancial Impact\nFR\nCertification\n2011\ncorrection of error from previous exercise (FY 2008)\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 316,93\n0,00\n– 316,93\nCertification\n2011\ncorrection of Most Likely Error\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 64 506,94\n0,00\n– 64 506,94\nClearance of Accounts — Conformity Clearance\n2011\nKnown error (EAFRD Non- IACS)\nONE OFF\n0,00\nEUR\n– 782 916,85\n0,00\n– 782 916,85\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area related measures)\n2011\nLack of animal-counting and then of assessment of the livestock density during on-the-spot checks\nFLAT RATE\n10,00\nEUR\n– 22 305 396,89\n– 2 656 820,83\n– 19 648 576,06\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area related measures)\n2012\nLack of animal-counting and then of assessment of the livestock density during on-the-spot checks\nFLAT RATE\n10,00\nEUR\n– 46 755 450,92\n– 9 650 360,15\n– 37 105 090,77\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area related measures)\n2013\nLack of animal-counting and then of assessment of the livestock density during on-the-spot checks\nFLAT RATE\n10,00\nEUR\n– 46 471 360,9\n– 4 948 400,38\n– 41 522 960,52\nCertification\n2012\nMost Likely Error correction\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 63 400,43\n0,00\n– 63 400,43\nClearance of Accounts — Conformity Clearance\n2011\nMost likely error (EAFRD IACS)\nONE OFF\n0,00\nEUR\n– 7 657 843,46\n– 7 637 276,78\n– 20 566,68\nClearance of Accounts — Conformity Clearance\n2011\nMost likely error (EAFRD Non- IACS)\nONE OFF\n0,00\nEUR\n– 1 750 641,89\n– 372 722,18\n– 1 377 919,71\nTotal FR:\nEUR\n– 125 851 835,21\n– 25 265 580,32\n– 100 586 254,89\nMember State\nMeasure\nFY\nReason\nType\nCorrection (%)\nCurrency\nAmount\nDeductions\nFinancial Impact\nGB\nCertification\n2011\nFinancial errors in the EAFRD non-IACS population\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 1 306 993,0\n0,00\n– 1 306 993,0\nCertification\n2012\nFinancial errors in the EAFRD non-IACS population\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 1 596 378,44\n0,00\n– 1 596 378,44\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area related measures)\n2010\nweaknesses in cross-checks and on-the-spot controls\nFLAT RATE\n2,00\nEUR\n– 300 348,62\n– 3 991,44\n– 296 357,18\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area related measures)\n2010\nweaknesses in cross-checks and on-the-spot controls\nFLAT RATE\n5,00\nEUR\n– 1 413 238,27\n0,00\n– 1 413 238,27\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area related measures)\n2011\nweaknesses in cross-checks and on-the-spot controls\nFLAT RATE\n2,00\nEUR\n– 103 768,07\n– 99 876,41\n– 3 891,66\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area related measures)\n2011\nweaknesses in cross-checks and on-the-spot controls\nFLAT RATE\n5,00\nEUR\n– 2 996 703,65\n0,00\n– 2 996 703,65\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area related measures)\n2012\nweaknesses in cross-checks and on-the-spot controls\nFLAT RATE\n2,00\nEUR\n– 1 424,63\n– 1 424,63\n0,00\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area related measures)\n2012\nweaknesses in cross-checks and on-the-spot controls\nFLAT RATE\n5,00\nEUR\n– 564 186,68\n0,00\n– 564 186,68\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area related measures)\n2012\nWeaknesses in the LPIS-GIS and in the on-the-spot checks\nFLAT RATE\n2,00\nEUR\n– 655,53\n0,00\n– 655,53\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area related measures)\n2011\nWeaknesses in the LPIS-GIS and the in on-the-spot checks\nFLAT RATE\n2,00\nEUR\n– 99 876,41\n0,00\n– 99 876,41\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area related measures)\n2012\nWeaknesses in the LPIS-GIS and the in on-the-spot checks\nFLAT RATE\n2,00\nEUR\n– 75 788,97\n0,00\n– 75 788,97\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area related measures)\n2011\nWeaknesses in updating LPIS maximum eligible area, Agri-environment measures, CY 2010\nFLAT RATE\n5,00\nEUR\n– 221 950,51\n0,00\n– 221 950,51\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area related measures)\n2012\nWeaknesses in updating LPIS maximum eligible area, Agri-environment measures, CY 2010\nFLAT RATE\n5,00\nEUR\n– 69 387,51\n0,00\n– 69 387,51\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area related measures)\n2012\nWeaknesses in updating LPIS maximum eligible area, Agri-environment measures, CY 2011\nFLAT RATE\n5,00\nEUR\n– 160 272,96\n0,00\n– 160 272,96\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area related measures)\n2013\nWeaknesses in updating LPIS maximum eligible area, Agri-environment measures, CY 2012\nFLAT RATE\n5,00\nEUR\n– 229 071,45\n0,00\n– 229 071,45\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area related measures)\n2011\nWeaknesses in updating LPIS maximum eligible area, Less-favoured area, CY 2010\nEXTRAPOLATED\n4,93\nEUR\n– 606 376,23\n0,00\n– 606 376,23\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area related measures)\n2012\nWeaknesses in updating LPIS maximum eligible area, Less-favoured area, CY 2010\nEXTRAPOLATED\n4,93\nEUR\n– 799,88\n0,00\n– 799,88\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area related measures)\n2012\nWeaknesses in updating LPIS maximum eligible area, Less-favoured area, CY 2011\nEXTRAPOLATED\n7,23\nEUR\n– 1 313 436,22\n0,00\n– 1 313 436,22\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area related measures)\n2013\nWeaknesses in updating LPIS maximum eligible area, Less-favoured area, CY 2012\nEXTRAPOLATED\n4,93\nEUR\n– 12 197,2\n0,00\n– 12 197,2\nTotal GB:\nEUR\n– 11 072 854,23\n– 105 292,48\n– 10 967 561,75\nMember State\nMeasure\nFY\nReason\nType\nCorrection (%)\nCurrency\nAmount\nDeductions\nFinancial Impact\nGR\nCross Compliance\n2010\nIncomplete check for 3 SMR and 1 GAEC, CY 2009\nFLAT RATE\n2,00\nEUR\n– 153 198,35\n– 5 327,59\n– 147 870,76\nCross Compliance\n2011\nIncomplete check for 3 SMR and 1 GAEC, CY 2009\nFLAT RATE\n2,00\nEUR\n– 187 418,78\n0,00\n– 187 418,78\nCross Compliance\n2012\nIncomplete check for 3 SMR and 1 GAEC, CY 2009\nFLAT RATE\n2,00\nEUR\n– 2 231,63\n0,00\n– 2 231,63\nCross Compliance\n2010\nIncomplete check for 3 SMR and 1 GAEC, CY 2010\nFLAT RATE\n2,00\nEUR\n– 35 104,46\n0,00\n– 35 104,46\nCross Compliance\n2011\nIncomplete check for 3 SMR and 1 GAEC, CY 2010\nFLAT RATE\n2,00\nEUR\n– 204 353,87\n0,00\n– 204 353,87\nCross Compliance\n2012\nIncomplete check for 3 SMR and 1 GAEC, CY 2010\nFLAT RATE\n2,00\nEUR\n– 36 611,23\n0,00\n– 36 611,23\nCross Compliance\n2013\nIncomplete check for 3 SMR and 1 GAEC, CY 2010\nFLAT RATE\n2,00\nEUR\n– 4 633,82\n0,00\n– 4 633,82\nCross Compliance\n2011\nIncomplete check for 3 SMR and 1 GAEC, CY 2011\nFLAT RATE\n2,00\nEUR\n– 61 471,51\n0,00\n– 61 471,51\nCross Compliance\n2012\nIncomplete check for 3 SMR and 1 GAEC, CY 2011\nFLAT RATE\n2,00\nEUR\n– 324 047,75\n0,00\n– 324 047,75\nCross Compliance\n2013\nIncomplete check for 3 SMR and 1 GAEC, CY 2011\nFLAT RATE\n2,00\nEUR\n– 24 741,4\n0,00\n– 24 741,4\nTotal GR:\nEUR\n– 1 033 812,8\n– 5 327,59\n– 1 028 485,21\nMember State\nMeasure\nFY\nReason\nType\nCorrection (%)\nCurrency\nAmount\nDeductions\nFinancial Impact\nHU\nCross Compliance\n2011\nIneffective or partial checks for 4 SMRs, CY2010\nFLAT RATE\n2,00\nEUR\n– 312 467,18\n– 0,47\n– 312 466,71\nCross Compliance\n2012\nIneffective or partial checks for 4 SMRs, CY2011\nFLAT RATE\n2,00\nEUR\n– 298 558,71\n0,00\n– 298 558,71\nCross Compliance\n2009\nNo definition of a GAEC standard, CY2008\nFLAT RATE\n2,00\nEUR\n– 42 691,18\n– 1 096,09\n– 41 595,09\nCross Compliance\n2010\nNo definition of a GAEC standard, Ineffective or partial checks for 4 SMRs, CY2009\nFLAT RATE\n2,00\nEUR\n– 277 887,36\n– 390,56\n– 277 496,8\nTotal HU:\nEUR\n– 931 604,43\n– 1 487,12\n– 930 117,31\nMember State\nMeasure\nFY\nReason\nType\nCorrection (%)\nCurrency\nAmount\nDeductions\nFinancial Impact\nIT\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 1 — Measures with flat rate support (2007-2013)\n2011\nNon-respect of 18 months deadline — Art. 13(4) of Reg.1974/2006\nFLAT RATE\n5,00\nEUR\n– 38 931,65\n0,00\n– 38 931,65\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 1 — Measures with flat rate support (2007-2013)\n2012\nNon-respect of 18 months deadline — Art. 13(4) of Reg.1974/2006\nFLAT RATE\n5,00\nEUR\n– 220 159,01\n0,00\n– 220 159,01\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 1 — Measures with flat rate support (2007-2013)\n2013\nNon-respect of 18 months deadline — Art. 13(4) of Reg.1974/2006\nFLAT RATE\n5,00\nEUR\n– 222 762,74\n– 1 364 263,7\n1 141 500,96\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area related measures)\n2011\nWeaknesses on the on-the-spot controls\nFLAT RATE\n2,00\nEUR\n– 89 263,4\n0,00\n– 89 263,4\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area related measures)\n2011\nWeaknesses on the on-the-spot controls\nFLAT RATE\n5,00\nEUR\n– 561 912,24\n0,00\n– 561 912,24\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area related measures)\n2012\nWeaknesses on the on-the-spot controls\nFLAT RATE\n2,00\nEUR\n– 88 547,61\n0,00\n– 88 547,61\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area related measures)\n2012\nWeaknesses on the on-the-spot controls\nFLAT RATE\n5,00\nEUR\n– 770 037,0\n0,00\n– 770 037,0\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area related measures)\n2011\nWeakness in the on the spot checks\nFLAT RATE\n2,00\nEUR\n– 6 013,85\n0,00\n– 6 013,85\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area related measures)\n2011\nWeakness in the on the spot checks\nFLAT RATE\n5,00\nEUR\n– 475 521,25\n0,00\n– 475 521,25\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area related measures)\n2012\nWeakness in the on the spot checks\nFLAT RATE\n2,00\nEUR\n– 9 979,46\n0,00\n– 9 979,46\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area related measures)\n2012\nWeakness in the on the spot checks\nFLAT RATE\n5,00\nEUR\n– 180 719,23\n0,00\n– 180 719,23\nTotal IT:\nEUR\n– 2 663 847,44\n– 1 364 263,7\n– 1 299 583,74\nMember State\nMeasure\nFY\nReason\nType\nCorrection (%)\nCurrency\nAmount\nDeductions\nFinancial Impact\nLT\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 1 — Measures with flat rate support\n2011\ndeficiencies in the Early Retirement scheme\nFLAT RATE\n5,00\nEUR\n– 723 284,18\n0,00\n– 723 284,18\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 1 — Measures with flat rate support\n2012\ndeficiencies in the Early Retirement scheme\nFLAT RATE\n5,00\nEUR\n– 637 047,08\n0,00\n– 637 047,08\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 1 — Measures with flat rate support\n2013\ndeficiencies in the Early Retirement scheme\nFLAT RATE\n5,00\nEUR\n– 577 968,82\n0,00\n– 577 968,82\nTotal LT:\nEUR\n– 1 938 300,08\n0,00\n– 1 938 300,08\nMember State\nMeasure\nFY\nReason\nType\nCorrection (%)\nCurrency\nAmount\nDeductions\nFinancial Impact\nLU\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area related measures)\n2012\nControl weaknesses\nFLAT RATE\n2,00\nEUR\n– 9 535,97\n0,00\n– 9 535,97\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area related measures)\n2013\nControl weaknesses\nFLAT RATE\n2,00\nEUR\n– 10 852,37\n0,00\n– 10 852,37\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area related measures)\n2007\nRecovery of expenses and payments in installments\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 1 698,74\n0,00\n– 1 698,74\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area related measures)\n2009\nRecovery of expenses and payments in installments\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 81 935,9\n0,00\n– 81 935,9\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area related measures)\n2010\nRecovery of expenses and payments in installments\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 15 911,78\n0,00\n– 15 911,78\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area related measures)\n2011\nRecovery of expenses and payments in installments\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 143 677,09\n– 1 058,16\n– 142 618,93\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area related measures)\n2012\nRecovery of expenses and payments in installments\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 85 606,5\n0,00\n– 85 606,5\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area related measures)\n2013\nRecovery of expenses and payments in installments\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 3 346,1\n0,00\n– 3 346,1\nCross Compliance\n2010\nWeaknesses in controls and sanctions for many SMR, CY2009\nFLAT RATE\n5,00\nEUR\n– 33 426,58\n– 756,39\n– 32 670,19\nCross Compliance\n2011\nWeaknesses in controls and sanctions for many SMR, CY2009\nFLAT RATE\n5,00\nEUR\n– 267,21\n0,00\n– 267,21\nCross Compliance\n2012\nWeaknesses in controls and sanctions for many SMR, CY2009\nFLAT RATE\n5,00\nEUR\n– 73,03\n0,00\n– 73,03\nCross Compliance\n2010\nWeaknesses in controls and sanctions for many SMR, CY2010\nFLAT RATE\n5,00\nEUR\n4,54\n0,00\n4,54\nCross Compliance\n2011\nWeaknesses in controls and sanctions for many SMR, CY2010\nFLAT RATE\n5,00\nEUR\n– 37 044,42\n– 724,56\n– 36 319,86\nCross Compliance\n2012\nWeaknesses in controls and sanctions for many SMR, CY2010\nFLAT RATE\n5,00\nEUR\n– 795,19\n0,00\n– 795,19\nCross Compliance\n2013\nWeaknesses in controls and sanctions for many SMR, CY2010\nFLAT RATE\n5,00\nEUR\n– 17,23\n0,00\n– 17,23\nCross Compliance\n2011\nWeaknesses in controls for some SMR, CY2011\nFLAT RATE\n2,00\nEUR\n– 1 127,36\n0,00\n– 1 127,36\nCross Compliance\n2012\nWeaknesses in controls for some SMR, CY2011\nFLAT RATE\n2,00\nEUR\n– 14 826,04\n– 190,28\n– 14 635,76\nCross Compliance\n2013\nWeaknesses in controls for some SMR, CY2011\nFLAT RATE\n2,00\nEUR\n– 43,48\n0,00\n– 43,48\nCross Compliance\n2012\nWeaknesses in controls for some SMR, CY2012\nFLAT RATE\n2,00\nEUR\n– 16,59\n0,00\n– 16,59\nCross Compliance\n2013\nWeaknesses in controls for some SMR, CY2012\nFLAT RATE\n2,00\nEUR\n– 14 920,14\n– 70,99\n– 14 849,15\nTotal LU:\nEUR\n– 455 117,18\n– 2 800,38\n– 452 316,8\nMember State\nMeasure\nFY\nReason\nType\nCorrection (%)\nCurrency\nAmount\nDeductions\nFinancial Impact\nNL\nCertification\n2013\nMost likely error\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 42 793,0\n0,00\n– 42 793,0\nCross Compliance\n2011\nPartial control of four SMRs, CY 2010\nFLAT RATE\n2,00\nEUR\n– 43 836,31\n0,00\n– 43 836,31\nCross Compliance\n2012\nPartial control of four SMRs, CY 2011\nFLAT RATE\n2,00\nEUR\n– 73 073,89\n0,00\n– 73 073,89\nCross Compliance\n2010\nTwo GAEC missing, partial control of three SMRs, CY 2009\nFLAT RATE\n2,00\nEUR\n– 34 616,83\n0,00\n– 34 616,83\nTotal NL:\nEUR\n– 194 320,03\n0,00\n– 194 320,03\nMember State\nMeasure\nFY\nReason\nType\nCorrection (%)\nCurrency\nAmount\nDeductions\nFinancial Impact\nPL\nCross Compliance\n2010\n1 GAEC not adequately defined and not controlled, CY 2009\nFLAT RATE\n2,00\nEUR\n– 920 956,49\n– 2 599,64\n– 918 356,85\nCross Compliance\n2011\n1 GAEC not adequately defined and not controlled, CY 2009\nFLAT RATE\n2,00\nEUR\n– 1 637,99\n0,00\n– 1 637,99\nCross Compliance\n2012\n1 GAEC not adequately defined and not controlled, CY 2009\nFLAT RATE\n2,00\nEUR\n829,37\n0,00\n829,37\nCross Compliance\n2009\n3 GAEC not defined or controlled, incorrect application of repetition, CY 2008\nFLAT RATE\n2,00\nEUR\n– 859 668,25\n– 17 327,49\n– 842 340,76\nCross Compliance\n2010\n3 GAEC not defined or controlled, incorrect application of repetition, CY 2008\nFLAT RATE\n2,00\nEUR\n– 671,06\n0,00\n– 671,06\nCross Compliance\n2011\n3 GAEC not defined or controlled, incorrect application of repetition, CY 2008\nFLAT RATE\n2,00\nEUR\n1 493,39\n0,00\n1 493,39\nTotal PL:\nEUR\n– 1 780 611,03\n– 19 927,13\n– 1 760 683,9\nMember State\nMeasure\nFY\nReason\nType\nCorrection (%)\nCurrency\nAmount\nDeductions\nFinancial Impact\nPT\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area related measures)\n2009\nWeaknesses in LPIS, RD, CY2009\nFLAT RATE\n5,00\nEUR\n– 4 465 827,52\n– 816 938,24\n– 3 648 889,28\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area related measures)\n2010\nWeaknesses in LPIS, RD, CY2009\nFLAT RATE\n5,00\nEUR\n– 2 780 072,82\n– 449 485,15\n– 2 330 587,67\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area related measures)\n2011\nWeaknesses in LPIS, RD, CY2009\nFLAT RATE\n5,00\nEUR\n– 82 221,34\n0,00\n– 82 221,34\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area related measures)\n2012\nWeaknesses in LPIS, RD, CY2009\nFLAT RATE\n5,00\nEUR\n– 14 201,2\n0,00\n– 14 201,2\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area related measures)\n2010\nWeaknesses in LPIS, RD, CY2010\nFLAT RATE\n5,00\nEUR\n– 3 749 104,01\n0,00\n– 3 749 104,01\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area related measures)\n2011\nWeaknesses in LPIS, RD, CY2010\nFLAT RATE\n5,00\nEUR\n– 4 067 474,49\n0,00\n– 4 067 474,49\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area related measures)\n2012\nWeaknesses in LPIS, RD, CY2010\nFLAT RATE\n5,00\nEUR\n– 229 875,48\n0,00\n– 229 875,48\nTotal PT:\nEUR\n– 15 388 776,86\n– 1 266 423,39\n– 14 122 353,47\nMember State\nMeasure\nFY\nReason\nType\nCorrection (%)\nCurrency\nAmount\nDeductions\nFinancial Impact\nRO\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 1+3 — Investment orientated measures (2007-2013)\n2011\nVerification of the eligibility criteria for SME\nFLAT RATE\n5,00\nEUR\n– 3 355 151,85\n0,00\n– 3 355 151,85\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 1+3 — Investment orientated measures (2007-2013)\n2012\nVerification of the eligibility criteria for SME\nFLAT RATE\n5,00\nEUR\n– 287 527,73\n0,00\n– 287 527,73\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area related measures)\n2011\nLack of traceability of checks carried out on the spot\nFLAT RATE\n2,00\nEUR\n– 2 731 178,66\n– 2 731 178,66\n0,00\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 1+3 — Investment orientated measures (2007-2013)\n2009\nnon-efficient eligibility check and non-efficient cost reasonableness verification\nFLAT RATE\n10,00\nEUR\n– 1 133 070,66\n0,00\n– 1 133 070,66\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 1+3 — Investment orientated measures (2007-2013)\n2010\nnon-efficient eligibility check and non-efficient cost reasonableness verification\nFLAT RATE\n10,00\nEUR\n– 5 770 820,63\n0,00\n– 5 770 820,63\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 1+3 — Investment orientated measures (2007-2013)\n2011\nnon-efficient eligibility check and non-efficient cost reasonableness verification\nFLAT RATE\n10,00\nEUR\n– 950 205,57\n0,00\n– 950 205,57\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 1+3 — Investment orientated measures (2007-2013)\n2012\nnon-efficient eligibility check and non-efficient cost reasonableness verification\nFLAT RATE\n10,00\nEUR\n– 7 608 827,95\n0,00\n– 7 608 827,95\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 1+3 — Investment orientated measures (2007-2013)\n2009\nNot enough control on the reasonableness of the costs (purchases of goods)\nFLAT RATE\n5,00\nEUR\n– 2 620 758,9\n– 2 620 758,9\n0,00\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 1+3 — Investment orientated measures (2007-2013)\n2010\nNot enough control on the reasonableness of the costs (purchases of goods)\nFLAT RATE\n5,00\nEUR\n– 4 160 449,26\n– 4 160 449,26\n0,00\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 1+3 — Investment orientated measures (2007-2013)\n2011\nNot enough control on the reasonableness of the costs (purchases of goods)\nFLAT RATE\n5,00\nEUR\n– 3 638 274,92\n0,00\n– 3 638 274,92\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 1+3 — Investment orientated measures (2007-2013)\n2012\nNot enough control on the reasonableness of the costs (purchases of goods)\nFLAT RATE\n5,00\nEUR\n– 3 118 370,51\n0,00\n– 3 118 370,51\nTotal RO:\nEUR\n– 35 374 636,64\n– 9 512 386,82\n– 25 862 249,82\nMember State\nMeasure\nFY\nReason\nType\nCorrection (%)\nCurrency\nAmount\nDeductions\nFinancial Impact\nSE\nClearance of Accounts — Conformity Clearance\n2013\nKnown Error (EAFRD-IACS population)\nONE OFF\n0,00\nEUR\n– 488,09\n0,00\n– 488,09\nCertification\n2011\nMost Likely Error (EAFRD non-IACS)\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 1 649 879,53\n0,00\n– 1 649 879,53\nClearance of Accounts — Conformity Clearance\n2013\nMost Likely Error (EAFRD non-IACS population)\nONE OFF\n0,00\nEUR\n– 730 668,81\n0,00\n– 730 668,81\nCross Compliance\n2010\nReduce scope of control for SMR2, RD, CY 2009\nFLAT RATE\n2,00\nEUR\n– 138 868,55\n0,00\n– 138 868,55\nCross Compliance\n2011\nReduce scope of control for SMR2, RD, CY 2010\nFLAT RATE\n2,00\nEUR\n– 189 154,34\n0,00\n– 189 154,34\nCross Compliance\n2012\nReduce scope of control for SMR2, RD, CY 2011\nFLAT RATE\n2,00\nEUR\n– 196 441,61\n0,00\n– 196 441,61\nTotal SE:\nEUR\n– 2 905 500,93\n0,00\n– 2 905 500,93\nMember State\nMeasure\nFY\nReason\nType\nCorrection (%)\nCurrency\nAmount\nDeductions\nFinancial Impact\nSI\nCertification\n2013\nEAFRD debts prematurely declared irrecoverable\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 1 214,1\n0,00\n– 1 214,1\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area related measures)\n2011\nLack of administrative checks — crop rotation\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 136 630,13\n0,00\n– 136 630,13\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area related measures)\n2011\nLack of administrative checks related to specific commitments under certain agro-environement measures (214)\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 9 476,1\n0,00\n– 9 476,1\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area related measures)\n2012\nLack of administrative checks related to specific commitments under certain agro-environement measures (214)\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 9 463,42\n0,00\n– 9 463,42\nTotal SI:\nEUR\n– 156 783,75\n0,00\n– 156 783,75\nCurrency\nAmount\nDeductions\nFinancial Impact\nEUR\n– 208 597 209,79\n– 37 912 598,06\n– 170 684 611,73",
  "extent": "E+W+S+N.I.",
  "status": null,
  "version": "current",
  "annotations": [],
  "outstanding_effects": [],
  "provenance": {
    "source": "legislation.gov.uk",
    "source_url": "https://www.legislation.gov.uk/eudn/2015/1119/annex/division/4",
    "retrieved_at": "2026-11-01T15:14:18.333981+00:00"
  },
  "licence": "Open Government Licence v3.0",
  "licence_url": "https://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/version/3/",
  "attribution": "Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Source: legislation.gov.uk, The National Archives."
}