{
  "url": "https://openlegislation.uk/eu-decision-2015-2098/annex/division-2",
  "json_url": "https://openlegislation.uk/eu-decision-2015-2098/annex/division-2.json",
  "legislation": "eudn/2015/2098",
  "legislation_title": "Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2015/2098 of 13 November 2015 excluding from European Union financing certain expenditure incurred by the Member States under the European Agricultural Guarantee Fund (EAGF) and under the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) (notified under document C(2015) 7716) (Only the Bulgarian, Czech, Danish, Dutch, English, French, German, Greek, Italian, Latvian, Lithuanian, Portuguese, Romanian, Slovak, Slovenian, Spanish, Swedish texts are authentic)",
  "legislation_url": "https://openlegislation.uk/eu-decision-2015-2098",
  "path": "annex/division/2",
  "kind": "division",
  "number": null,
  "heading": "Budget Item: 6701",
  "text": "Member State\nMeasure\nFY\nReason\nType\nCorrection %\nCurrency\nAmount\nDeductions\nFinancial Impact\nDE\nCertification\n2010\nEAGF Non-IACS known error\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 264 813,77\n0,00\n– 264 813,77\nFruit and Vegetables — Exceptional support measures\n2011\nMecklenburg-Vorpommern: withdrawal operations before the entry into force of Regulation (EU) No 585/2011\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 4 917,03\n0,00\n– 4 917,03\nCertification\n2010\nMLE for the EAGF Non-IACS population\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 97 582,36\n0,00\n– 97 582,36\nDecoupled Direct Aids\n2011\nNon-Extrapolation of results on-the-spot checks, claim years 2010-2012\nONE OFF\n0,00 %\nEUR\n– 93 482,99\n0,00\n– 93 482,99\nDecoupled Direct Aids\n2012\nNon-Extrapolation of results on-the-spot checks, claim years 2010-2012\nONE OFF\n0,00 %\nEUR\n– 36 627,26\n0,00\n– 36 627,26\nFruit and Vegetables — Exceptional support measures\n2011\nRheinland-Pfalz: management and control system before the entry into force of Regulation (EU) No 585/2011\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 194 499,62\n0,00\n– 194 499,62\nFruit and Vegetables — Operational Programmes\n2011\nShortcomings in the recognition of PO 139040000019 — Mecklenburg-Vorpommern Region\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 129 432,74\n0,00\n– 129 432,74\nFruit and Vegetables — Operational Programmes\n2012\nShortcomings in the recognition of PO 139040000019 — Mecklenburg-Vorpommern Region\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 147 300,28\n0,00\n– 147 300,28\nFruit and Vegetables — Operational Programmes\n2013\nShortcomings in the recognition of PO 139040000019 — Mecklenburg-Vorpommern Region\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 150 064,03\n0,00\n– 150 064,03\n_Recoveries\n2014\nUnjustified halting of recovery\nONE OFF\n0,00 %\nEUR\n– 2 481 722,5\n0,00\n– 2 481 722,5\nDecoupled Direct Aids\n2010\nWeakness on landscape features, claim years 2009-2011\nONE OFF\n0,00 %\nEUR\n– 370 623,93\n0,00\n– 370 623,93\nDecoupled Direct Aids\n2011\nWeakness on landscape features, claim years 2009-2011\nONE OFF\n0,00 %\nEUR\n– 357 838,28\n0,00\n– 357 838,28\nDecoupled Direct Aids\n2012\nWeakness on landscape features, claim years 2009-2011\nONE OFF\n0,00 %\nEUR\n– 105 163,65\n0,00\n– 105 163,65\nTotal DE:\nEUR\n– 4 434 068,44\n0,00\n– 4 434 068,44\nMember State\nMeasure\nFY\nReason\nType\nCorrection %\nCurrency\nAmount\nDeductions\nFinancial Impact\nES\nCertification\n2011\nknown error\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 3 998,89\n0,00\n– 3 998,89\nOther Direct Aid — Plant Products (POSEI)\n2008\nWeaknesses in SIGPAC impacting area-based complementary aid for bananas\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 135 979,57\n0,00\n– 135 979,57\nOther Direct Aid — Plant Products (POSEI)\n2009\nWeaknesses in SIGPAC impacting area-based complementary aid for bananas\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 308 720,4\n0,00\n– 308 720,4\nOther Direct Aid — POSEI\n2010\nWeaknesses in SIGPAC impacting area-based complementary aid for bananas\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 306 723,0\n0,00\n– 306 723,0\nOther Direct Aid — POSEI\n2011\nWeaknesses in SIGPAC impacting area-based complementary aid for bananas\nFLAT RATE\n2,00 %\nEUR\n– 123 456,0\n0,00\n– 123 456,0\nOther Direct Aid — POSEI\n2012\nWeaknesses in SIGPAC impacting area-based complementary aid for bananas\nFLAT RATE\n2,00 %\nEUR\n– 122 037,12\n0,00\n– 122 037,12\nTotal ES:\nEUR\n– 1 000 914,98\n0,00\n– 1 000 914,98\nMember State\nMeasure\nFY\nReason\nType\nCorrection %\nCurrency\nAmount\nDeductions\nFinancial Impact\nFR\nOther Direct Aid — Article 68-72 of Reg.73/2009\n2013\nDeficiencies in the control of the bovine measures (veals) under Article 68 of Regulation 73/2009\nFLAT RATE\n10,00 %\nEUR\n– 406 858,17\n0,00\n– 406 858,17\nOther Direct Aid — Article 68-72 of Reg.73/2009\n2014\nDeficiencies in the control of the bovine measures (veals) under Article 68 of Regulation 73/2009\nFLAT RATE\n10,00 %\nEUR\n– 442 175,48\n0,00\n– 442 175,48\nWine — Restructuring\n2009\nPayment of aid before completion of restructuring operations\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 606 952,96\n0,00\n– 606 952,96\nWine — Restructuring\n2010\nPayment of aid before completion of restructuring operations\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 4 372 246,97\n0,00\n– 4 372 246,97\nWine — Restructuring\n2011\nPayment of aid before completion of restructuring operations\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 5 707 849,36\n0,00\n– 5 707 849,36\nTotal FR:\nEUR\n– 11 536 082,94\n0,00\n– 11 536 082,94\nMember State\nMeasure\nFY\nReason\nType\nCorrection %\nCurrency\nAmount\nDeductions\nFinancial Impact\nGB\nFruit and Vegetables — Operational Programmes\n2005\nIneligible expenditure\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 1 465 892,11\n– 54 831,07\n– 1 411 061,04\nFruit and Vegetables — Operational Programmes\n2006\nIneligible expenditure\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 242 089,88\n– 46 800,46\n– 195 289,42\nFruit and Vegetables — Operational Programmes\n2007\nIneligible expenditure\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 1 233 634,25\n– 238 484,38\n– 995 149,87\nFruit and Vegetables — Operational Programmes\n2008\nIneligible expenditure (Exclusion)\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 13 400,14\n0,00\n– 13 400,14\nFruit and Vegetables — Operational Programmes\n2009\nIneligible expenditure (Exclusion)\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 59 288,47\n0,00\n– 59 288,47\nFruit and Vegetables — Operational Programmes\n2010\nIneligible expenditure (Exclusion)\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 22 715,72\n0,00\n– 22 715,72\nFruit and Vegetables — Operational Programmes\n2008\nNon-compliance with recognition criteria of producer organisations (100 % exclusion of 16 non-compliant producer organisations)\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 3 656 140,55\n0,00\n– 3 656 140,55\nFruit and Vegetables — Operational Programmes\n2009\nNon-compliance with recognition criteria of producer organisations (100 % exclusion of 16 non-compliant producer organisations)\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 6 184 584,8\n0,00\n– 6 184 584,8\nFruit and Vegetables — Operational Programmes\n2010\nNon-compliance with recognition criteria of producer organisations (100 % exclusion of 16 non-compliant producer organisations)\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 3 480 891,95\n0,00\n– 3 480 891,95\nFruit and Vegetables — Operational Programmes\n2011\nNon-compliance with recognition criteria of producer organisations (100 % exclusion of 16 non-compliant producer organisations)\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 427 546,59\n0,00\n– 427 546,59\nFruit and Vegetables — Operational Programmes\n2012\nNon-compliance with recognition criteria of producer organisations (100 % exclusion of 16 non-compliant producer organisations)\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 2 147,73\n0,00\n– 2 147,73\nFruit and Vegetables — Operational Programmes\n2008\nNon-compliance with recognition criteria of producer organisations (Extrapolation)\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 3 667 910,51\n0,00\n– 3 667 910,51\nFruit and Vegetables — Operational Programmes\n2009\nNon-compliance with recognition criteria of producer organisations (Extrapolation)\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 7 235 505,78\n0,00\n– 7 235 505,78\nFruit and Vegetables — Operational Programmes\n2010\nNon-compliance with recognition criteria of producer organisations (Extrapolation)\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 4 245 105,28\n0,00\n– 4 245 105,28\nFruit and Vegetables — Operational Programmes\n2011\nNon-compliance with recognition criteria of producer organisations (Extrapolation)\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 543 884,27\n0,00\n– 543 884,27\nFruit and Vegetables — Operational Programmes\n2012\nNon-compliance with recognition criteria of producer organisations (Extrapolation)\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 26 234,21\n0,00\n– 26 234,21\nFruit and Vegetables — Operational Programmes\n2008\nWeaknesses in key controls in operational programmes of producer organisations\nFLAT RATE\n10,00 %\nEUR\n– 1 116 828,27\n– 733 745,12\n– 383 083,15\nFruit and Vegetables — Operational Programmes\n2009\nWeaknesses in key controls in operational programmes of producer organisations\nFLAT RATE\n10,00 %\nEUR\n– 2 321 311,07\n– 1 347 937,91\n– 973 373,16\nFruit and Vegetables — Operational Programmes\n2010\nWeaknesses in key controls in operational programmes of producer organisations\nFLAT RATE\n10,00 %\nEUR\n– 1 230 356,65\n– 774 871,3\n– 455 485,35\nFruit and Vegetables — Operational Programmes\n2011\nWeaknesses in key controls in operational programmes of producer organisations\nFLAT RATE\n10,00 %\nEUR\n– 132 682,06\n– 97 143,08\n– 35 538,98\nFruit and Vegetables — Operational Programmes\n2012\nWeaknesses in key controls in operational programmes of producer organisations\nFLAT RATE\n10,00 %\nEUR\n– 4 552,41\n– 2 838,19\n– 1 714,22\nTotal GB:\nEUR\n– 37 312 702,7\n– 3 296 651,51\n– 34 016 051,19\nMember State\nMeasure\nFY\nReason\nType\nCorrection %\nCurrency\nAmount\nDeductions\nFinancial Impact\nGR\nOther Direct Aid — Article 68-72 of Reg.73/2009\n2014\nChanges introduced in declarations after the deadline\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 106 702,0\n0,00\n– 106 702,0\nOther Direct Aid — Article 68-72 of Reg.73/2009\n2012\nChanges introduced in declarations after the deadline\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 98 796,62\n0,00\n– 98 796,62\nOther Direct Aid — Article 68-72 of Reg.73/2009\n2013\nChanges introduced in declarations after the deadline\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 17 215,35\n0,00\n– 17 215,35\nOther Direct Aid — Article 68-72 of Reg.73/2009\n2012\nControl rate for ewes and she-goats scheme\nFLAT RATE\n2,00 %\nEUR\n– 485 838,55\n0,00\n– 485 838,55\nEntitlements\n2012\nConversions of special entitlements\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 10 821,89\n0,00\n– 10 821,89\nEntitlements\n2013\nConversions of special entitlements\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 55 395,36\n0,00\n– 55 395,36\nEntitlements\n2011\nConversions of special entitlements\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 5 204,47\n0,00\n– 5 204,47\nIrregularities\n2012\nDelays in the recovery procedure (case 154141)\nONE OFF\n0,00 %\nEUR\n– 941 437,4\n0,00\n– 941 437,4\nIrregularities\n2012\nDelays in the recovery procedure (case 162561)\nONE OFF\n0,00 %\nEUR\n– 842 096,15\n0,00\n– 842 096,15\nIrregularities\n2012\nDelays in the recovery procedure (case 162861)\nONE OFF\n0,00 %\nEUR\n– 552 487,95\n0,00\n– 552 487,95\nIrregularities\n2012\nDelays in the recovery procedure (case 163981)\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 279 013,86\n0,00\n– 279 013,86\nIrregularities\n2012\nDelays in the recovery procedure (case 164801)\nONE OFF\n0,00 %\nEUR\n– 27 440,99\n0,00\n– 27 440,99\nIrregularities\n2012\nDelays in the recovery procedure (case 47761)\nONE OFF\n0,00 %\nEUR\n– 452 069,58\n0,00\n– 452 069,58\nIrregularities\n2012\nDelays in the recovery procedure (case 47781)\nONE OFF\n0,00 %\nEUR\n– 1 080 514,89\n0,00\n– 1 080 514,89\nEntitlements\n2011\nNational reserve allocation in 2010 — Short term lease contract\nFLAT RATE\n10,00 %\nEUR\n– 95 815,5\n– 95 815,5\n0,00\nEntitlements\n2012\nNational reserve allocation in 2010 — Short term lease contract\nFLAT RATE\n10,00 %\nEUR\n– 83 079,9\n– 83 079,9\n0,00\nEntitlements\n2013\nNational reserve allocation in 2010 — Short term lease contract\nFLAT RATE\n10,00 %\nEUR\n– 89 037,3\n0,00\n– 89 037,3\nIrregularities\n2012\nNon reporting in Annex III (Cases EL/1995/002)\nONE OFF\n0,00 %\nEUR\n– 666 519,52\n0,00\n– 666 519,52\nIrregularities\n2012\nNon reporting in Annex III (Cases EL/1997/078/J)\nONE OFF\n0,00 %\nEUR\n– 700 033,3\n0,00\n– 700 033,3\nPromotional Measures\n2008\nnot implementing art 25 of Reg. (EC) 501/2008\nFLAT RATE\n10,00 %\nEUR\n– 18 671,28\n0,00\n– 18 671,28\nPromotional Measures\n2009\nnot implementing art 25 of Reg. (EC) 501/2008\nFLAT RATE\n10,00 %\nEUR\n– 129 920,48\n0,00\n– 129 920,48\nPromotional Measures\n2010\nnot implementing art 25 of Reg. (EC) 501/2008\nFLAT RATE\n10,00 %\nEUR\n– 200 612,64\n0,00\n– 200 612,64\nPromotional Measures\n2011\nnot implementing art 25 of Reg. (EC) 501/2008\nFLAT RATE\n10,00 %\nEUR\n– 228 647,15\n0,00\n– 228 647,15\nPromotional Measures\n2012\nnot implementing art 25 of Reg. (EC) 501/2008\nFLAT RATE\n10,00 %\nEUR\n– 83 658,55\n0,00\n– 83 658,55\nIrregularities\n2012\nWeaknesses in the debt management procedures\nFLAT RATE\n10,00 %\nEUR\n– 5 993 214,33\n– 417 506,08\n– 5 575 708,25\nTotal GR:\nEUR\n– 13 244 245,01\n– 596 401,48\n– 12 647 843,53\nMember State\nMeasure\nFY\nReason\nType\nCorrection %\nCurrency\nAmount\nDeductions\nFinancial Impact\nIE\nOther Direct Aid — Energy Crops\n2009\nCY 2008, LPIS & OTSC Weaknesses — Aid Energy Crops\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 31,05\n0,00\n– 31,05\nOther Direct Aids\n2009\nCY 2008, LPIS & OTSC Weaknesses — Other Direct Aids (Protein Crops)\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 6,11\n0,00\n– 6,11\nDecoupled Direct Aids\n2009\nCY 2008, LPIS & OTSC Weaknesses — SPS\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 13 797 397,95\n– 236 510,85\n– 13 560 887,1\nOther Direct Aids\n2010\nCY 2009, LPIS & OTSC Weaknesses — Other Direct Aids (Protein Crops)\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 34,45\n0,00\n– 34,45\nDecoupled Direct Aids\n2010\nCY 2009, LPIS & OTSC Weaknesses — SPS\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 12 885 281,59\n– 220 875,62\n– 12 664 405,97\nOther Direct Aid — Article 68-72 of Reg.73/2009\n2011\nCY 2010, LPIS & OTSC Weaknesses — ODA Art. 68 (Grassland Sheep Scheme)\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 38 235,25\n0,00\n– 38 235,25\nOther Direct Aids\n2011\nCY 2010, LPIS & OTSC Weaknesses — Other Direct Aids (Protein Crops)\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 11,11\n0,00\n– 11,11\nDecoupled Direct Aids\n2011\nCY 2010, LPIS & OTSC Weaknesses — SPS\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 10 322 794,07\n– 176 950,23\n– 10 145 843,84\nOther Direct Aid — Article 68-72 of Reg.73/2009\n2012\nCY 2011, LPIS & OTSC Weaknesses — ODA Art. 68 (Grassland Sheep Scheme)\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 38 060,15\n0,00\n– 38 060,15\nOther Direct Aids\n2012\nCY 2011, LPIS & OTSC Weaknesses — Other Direct Aids (Protein Crops)\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 7,78\n0,00\n– 7,78\nDecoupled Direct Aids\n2012\nCY 2011, LPIS & OTSC Weaknesses — SPS\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 9 441 799,89\n– 161 848,49\n– 9 279 951,4\nOther Direct Aid — Article 68-72 of Reg.73/2009\n2013\nCY 2012, LPIS & OTSC Weaknesses — ODA Art. 68 (Grassland Sheep Scheme)\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 38 125,91\n0,00\n– 38 125,91\nDecoupled Direct Aids\n2013\nCY 2012, LPIS & OTSC Weaknesses — SPS\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 9 180 051,51\n– 157 361,68\n– 9 022 689,83\nDecoupled Direct Aids\n2014\nPayments made before finalisation of the cross-checks\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 52 583,0\n0,00\n– 52 583,0\nDecoupled Direct Aids\n2014\nWeaknesses in the LPIS — CY 2013 — low eligibility coefficient\nESTIMATED PERCENTAGE\n0,15 %\nEUR\n– 1 794 724,38\n0,00\n– 1 794 724,38\nDecoupled Direct Aids\n2015\nWeaknesses in the LPIS — CY 2014 — low eligibility coefficient\nFLAT RATE\n0,15 %\nEUR\n– 1 751 128,17\n0,00\n– 1 751 128,17\nTotal IE:\nEUR\n– 59 340 272,37\n– 953 546,87\n– 58 386 725,5\nMember State\nMeasure\nFY\nReason\nType\nCorrection %\nCurrency\nAmount\nDeductions\nFinancial Impact\nIT\nCertification\n2009\nbad application of regulations\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 10 762 502,0\n0,00\n– 10 762 502,0\nFruit and Vegetables — Exceptional support measures\n2011\nDeduction of production already harvested. The guidance provided by the Italian authorities in June 2011 was not appropriate to allow the performance of the controls in compliance with the Article 4 (2) of Regulation (EU) No 585/2011\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 405 166,99\n– 1 143,95\n– 404 023,04\nEntitlements\n2010\nInadequate determination area of citrus fruit sector (decoupling)\nFLAT RATE\n10,00 %\nEUR\n– 2 452 251,96\n– 237,00\n– 2 452 014,96\nOther Direct Aid — Article 69 of Reg.1782/2003 — only Ovine and Bovines\n2010\nIncorrect calculation of reductions & exclusions — Risk sampling weaknesses (Art69 bovine sector)\nFLAT RATE\n2,00 %\nEUR\n– 465 893,6\n0,00\n– 465 893,6\nOther Direct Aid — Article 69 of Reg.1782/2003 — only Ovines and Bovines\n2011\nIncorrect calculation of reductions & exclusions — Risk sampling weaknesses (Art69 bovine sector)\nFLAT RATE\n2,00 %\nEUR\n– 15 678,19\n0,00\n– 15 678,19\nOther Direct Aid — Article 69 of Reg.1782/2003 — only Ovines and Bovines\n2012\nIncorrect calculation of reductions & exclusions — Risk sampling weaknesses (Art69 bovine sector)\nFLAT RATE\n2,00 %\nEUR\n– 4 528,2\n0,00\n– 4 528,2\nOther Direct Aid — Article 69 of Reg.1782/2003 — only Ovines and Bovines\n2013\nIncorrect calculation of reductions & exclusions — Risk sampling weaknesses (Art69 bovine sector)\nFLAT RATE\n2,00 %\nEUR\n45,16\n0,00\n45,16\nFruit and Vegetables — Exceptional support measures\n2011\nOn-the-spot controls performed by the Italian inspectors were not systematically taken into consideration when calculating the payable aid.\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 22 879,01\n0,00\n– 22 879,01\nOther Direct Aid — Article 69 of Reg.1782/2003 — only Ovines and Bovines\n2010\nOTSC minimum rate not achieved — Risk sampling weaknesses (Art69 sheep/goats CY2009)\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 28 020,72\n0,00\n– 28 020,72\nOther Direct Aid — Article 69 of Reg.1782/2003 — only Ovines and Bovines\n2011\nOTSC minimum rate not achieved — Risk sampling weaknesses (Art69 sheep/goats CY2009)\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 144,92\n0,00\n– 144,92\nOther Direct Aid — Article 69 of Reg.1782/2003 — only Ovines and Bovines\n2012\nOTSC minimum rate not achieved — Risk sampling weaknesses (Art69 sheep/goats CY2009)\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 34,58\n0,00\n– 34,58\nOther Direct Aid — Article 68-72 of Reg.73/2009\n2011\nOTSC: minimum rate not achieved & timing not respecting regulatory provisions (Art.68 sheep/goats)\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 162 507,94\n0,00\n– 162 507,94\nOther Direct Aid — Article 68-72 of Reg.73/2009\n2012\nOTSC: minimum rate not achieved & timing not respecting regulatory provisions (Art.68 sheep/goats)\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 13 957,29\n0,00\n– 13 957,29\nOther Direct Aid — Article 68-72 of Reg.73/2009\n2011\nOTSC timing not respecting regulatory provisions — incorrect calculation of reductions & exclusions (Art68 bovine sector) — Risk sampling weaknesses\nFLAT RATE\n2,00 %\nEUR\n– 688 755,5\n0,00\n– 688 755,5\nOther Direct Aid — Article 68-72 of Reg.73/2009\n2012\nOTSC timing not respecting regulatory provisions — incorrect calculation of reductions & exclusions (Art68 bovine sector) — Risk sampling weaknesses\nFLAT RATE\n2,00 %\nEUR\n– 28 700,82\n0,00\n– 28 700,82\nCross Compliance\n2010\nPartial coverage of SMR1 and SMR5, CY 2009\nFLAT RATE\n2,00 %\nEUR\n– 382 708,89\n0,00\n– 382 708,89\nCross Compliance\n2011\nPartial coverage of SMR1 and SMR5, CY 2010\nFLAT RATE\n2,00 %\nEUR\n– 420 298,75\n0,00\n– 420 298,75\nCross Compliance\n2012\nPartial coverage of SMR1 and SMR5, CY 2011\nFLAT RATE\n2,00 %\nEUR\n– 376 732,38\n0,00\n– 376 732,38\nOther Direct Aid — Article 69 of Reg.1782/2003 — only Ovines and Bovines\n2010\nRisk sampling weaknesses (Art69 sheep/goats CY2009)\nFLAT RATE\n2,00 %\nEUR\n– 10 716,99\n0,00\n– 10 716,99\nOther Direct Aid — Article 69 of Reg.1782/2003 — only Ovines and Bovines\n2011\nRisk sampling weaknesses (Art69 sheep/goats CY2009)\nFLAT RATE\n2,00 %\nEUR\n– 15,45\n0,00\n– 15,45\nOther Direct Aid — Article 69 of Reg.1782/2003 — only Ovines and Bovines\n2013\nRisk sampling weaknesses (Art69 sheep/goats CY2009)\nFLAT RATE\n2,00 %\nEUR\n– 66,66\n0,00\n– 66,66\nCross Compliance\n2009\nSerious deficiencies in the cross-compliance controls carry-out by the veterinary services, farmers with animals, CY 2008\nFLAT RATE\n10,00 %\nEUR\n– 6 698 435,55\n– 212 378,16\n– 6 486 057,39\nCross Compliance\n2010\nSerious deficiencies in the cross-compliance controls carry-out by the veterinary services, farmers with animals, CY 2009\nFLAT RATE\n10,00 %\nEUR\n– 6 193 786,19\n– 124 718,0\n– 6 069 068,19\nCross Compliance\n2011\nSerious deficiencies in the cross-compliance controls carry-out by the veterinary services, farmers with animals, CY 2010\nFLAT RATE\n10,00 %\nEUR\n– 6 803 948,36\n– 24 060,82\n– 6 779 887,54\nCross Compliance\n2010\nWeaknesses in control and sanctions of animal related SMRs, CY 2009\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 880 348,63\n– 1 453,94\n– 878 894,69\nCross Compliance\n2011\nWeaknesses in control and sanctions of animal related SMRs, CY 2010\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 946 039,32\n– 1 115,13\n– 944 924,19\nCross Compliance\n2012\nWeaknesses in control and sanctions of animal related SMRs, CY 2011\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 891 273,37\n– 3 350,4\n– 887 922,97\nCross Compliance\n2009\nWeaknesses in controls of SMR1 and 5, in cross-reporting from eligibility checks, farmers without animals, CY 2008\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 2 735 874,46\n0,00\n– 2 735 874,46\nCross Compliance\n2010\nWeaknesses in controls of SMR1 and 5, in cross-reporting from eligibility checks, farmers without animals, CY 2009\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 2 688 492,98\n0,00\n– 2 688 492,98\nCross Compliance\n2011\nWeaknesses in controls of SMR1 and 5, in cross-reporting from eligibility checks, farmers without animals, CY 2010\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 3 141 614,53\n0,00\n– 3 141 614,53\nTotal IT:\nEUR\n– 47 221 329,07\n– 368 457,4\n– 46 852 871,67\nMember State\nMeasure\nFY\nReason\nType\nCorrection %\nCurrency\nAmount\nDeductions\nFinancial Impact\nLT\nOther Direct Aid — Article 68-72 of Reg.73/2009\n2012\nRecoveries for ineligible animals\nONE OFF\n0,00 %\nEUR\n– 23 166,73\n0,00\n– 23 166,73\nOther Direct Aid — Article 68-72 of Reg.73/2009\n2012\nTiming and performance of OTSC\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 458 039,67\n– 1 158,34\n– 456 881,33\nOther Direct Aid — Article 68-72 of Reg.73/2009\n2013\nTiming and performance of OTSC\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 656 708,32\n0,00\n– 656 708,32\nDecoupled Direct Aids\n2012\nWeakness in quality of LPIS, 2011\nESTIMATED AMOUNT\n0,00 %\nEUR\n– 305 140,28\n– 47 262,68\n– 257 877,6\nDecoupled Direct Aids\n2010\nWeakness in quality of LPIS and cross-checks, 2009\nESTIMATED AMOUNT\nEUR\n– 3 281 119,25\n– 201 760,71\n– 3 079 358,54\nOther Direct Aid — Energy Crops\n2010\nWeakness in quality of LPIS and cross-checks, 2009\nESTIMATED AMOUNT\nEUR\n– 26 419,79\n– 1 258,91\n– 25 160,88\nDecoupled Direct Aids\n2011\nWeakness in quality of LPIS and cross-checks, 2010\nESTIMATED AMOUNT\nEUR\n– 1 411 640,83\n– 239 125,42\n– 1 172 515,41\nTotal LT:\nEUR\n– 6 162 234,87\n– 490 566,06\n– 5 671 668,81\nMember State\nMeasure\nFY\nReason\nType\nCorrection %\nCurrency\nAmount\nDeductions\nFinancial Impact\nNL\nCertification\n2011\nNon-application of regulatory sanctions in the Area aids\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 266 945,16\n– 533,89\n– 266 411,27\nFruit and Vegetables — Operational Programmes\n2008\nUnduly recognised and therefore ineligible producer organisations (beneficiaries)\nFLAT RATE\n10,00 %\nEUR\n– 3 634 876,03\n0,00\n– 3 634 876,03\nFruit and Vegetables — Operational Programmes\n2009\nUnduly recognised and therefore ineligible producer organisations (beneficiaries)\nFLAT RATE\n10,00 %\nEUR\n– 9 676 043,02\n0,00\n– 9 676 043,02\nFruit and Vegetables — Operational Programmes\n2009\nUnduly recognised and therefore ineligible producer organisations (beneficiaries)\nONE OFF\n0,00 %\nEUR\n– 22 444 064,75\n0,00\n– 22 444 064,75\nFruit and Vegetables — Operational Programmes\n2010\nUnduly recognised and therefore ineligible producer organisations (beneficiaries)\nFLAT RATE\n10,00 %\nEUR\n– 5 091 421,28\n– 1 060 066,47\n– 4 031 354,81\nFruit and Vegetables — Operational Programmes\n2010\nUnduly recognised and therefore ineligible producer organisations (beneficiaries)\nONE OFF\n0,00 %\nEUR\n– 10 185 726,0\n0,00\n– 10 185 726,0\nFruit and Vegetables — Operational Programmes\n2011\nUnduly recognised and therefore ineligible producer organisations (beneficiaries)\nFLAT RATE\n10,00 %\nEUR\n– 138 726,75\n– 79 662,72\n– 59 064,03\nFruit and Vegetables — Operational Programmes\n2011\nUnduly recognised and therefore ineligible producer organisations (beneficiaries)\nONE OFF\n0,00 %\nEUR\n– 796 627,19\n0,00\n– 796 627,19\nCertification\n2011\nUnrecorded interest\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 36 000,0\n0,00\n– 36 000,0\nTotal NL:\nEUR\n– 52 270 430,18\n– 1 140 263,08\n– 51 130 167,1\nMember State\nMeasure\nFY\nReason\nType\nCorrection %\nCurrency\nAmount\nDeductions\nFinancial Impact\nRO\nOther Direct Aid — Article 68-72 of Reg.73/2009\n2011\nFailure to apply sanctions when irregularities concern no more than three animals\nONE OFF\n0,00 %\nEUR\n– 1 304 365,59\n0,00\n– 1 304 365,59\nOther Direct Aid — Article 68-72 of Reg.73/2009\n2011\nNon-compliance in schedule and quality of on-the-spot checks\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 1 121 615,69\n– 107 659,09\n– 1 013 956,6\nOther Direct Aid — Article 68-72 of Reg.73/2009\n2012\nNon-compliance in schedule and quality of on-the-spot checks\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n141,59\n0,00\n141,59\nOther Direct Aid — Article 68-72 of Reg.73/2009\n2013\nNon-compliance in schedule and quality of on-the-spot checks\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 364,79\n0,00\n– 364,79\nOther Direct Aid — Article 68-72 of Reg.73/2009\n2011\nPayment for non-identified animals\nONE OFF\n0,00 %\nEUR\n– 57 984,66\n0,00\n– 57 984,66\nOther Direct Aid — Article 68-72 of Reg.73/2009\n2011\nProblems concerning the accuracy of the information contained in the database\nONE OFF\n0,00 %\nEUR\n– 411 471,9\n0,00\n– 411 471,9\nOther Direct Aid — Article 68-72 of Reg.73/2009\n2011\nVerification of retention period\nONE OFF\n0,00 %\nEUR\n– 379 359,7\n0,00\n– 379 359,7\nDecoupled Direct Aids\n2012\nWeaknesses in the on-the-spot checks — remote sensing\nFLAT RATE\n2,00 %\nEUR\n– 7 858 523,78\n0,00\n– 7 858 523,78\nTotal RO:\nEUR\n– 11 133 544,52\n– 107 659,09\n– 11 025 885,43\nMember State\nMeasure\nFY\nReason\nType\nCorrection %\nCurrency\nAmount\nDeductions\nFinancial Impact\nSI\nDecoupled Direct Aids\n2013\nCY 2012 — Lack of control procedure\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 42 615,9\n0,00\n– 42 615,9\nDecoupled Direct Aids\n2013\nCY 2012 — Weaknesses in administrative checks\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 45 828,58\n0,00\n– 45 828,58\nDecoupled Direct Aids\n2014\nCY 2013 — Lack of control procedure\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 45 519,08\n0,00\n– 45 519,08\nDecoupled Direct Aids\n2014\nCY 2013 — Weaknesses in administrative checks\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 63 146,69\n0,00\n– 63 146,69\nDecoupled Direct Aids\n2015\nCY 2014 — Lack of control procedure\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 34 211,94\n0,00\n– 34 211,94\nTotal SI:\nEUR\n– 231 322,19\n0,00\n– 231 322,19\nMember State\nMeasure\nFY\nReason\nType\nCorrection %\nCurrency\nAmount\nDeductions\nFinancial Impact\nSK\nDecoupled Direct Aids\n2011\nCY 2010, Unpaved access roads\nESTIMATED PERCENTAGE\n0,53 %\nEUR\n– 1 401 828,52\n0,00\n– 1 401 828,52\nDecoupled Direct Aids\n2012\nCY 2010, Unpaved access roads\nESTIMATED PERCENTAGE\n0,53 %\nEUR\n– 2 086,31\n0,00\n– 2 086,31\nDecoupled Direct Aids\n2013\nCY 2010, Unpaved access roads\nESTIMATED PERCENTAGE\n0,53 %\nEUR\n– 667,32\n0,00\n– 667,32\nDecoupled Direct Aids\n2012\nCY 2011, Unpaved access roads\nESTIMATED PERCENTAGE\n0,53 %\nEUR\n– 1 526 916,92\n0,00\n– 1 526 916,92\nDecoupled Direct Aids\n2013\nCY 2011, Unpaved access roads\nESTIMATED PERCENTAGE\n0,53 %\nEUR\n– 2 259,74\n0,00\n– 2 259,74\nPromotional Measures\n2009\nnon-respect of public procurement rules\nFLAT RATE\n25,00 %\nEUR\n– 126 925,93\n0,00\n– 126 925,93\nPromotional Measures\n2010\nnon-respect of public procurement rules\nFLAT RATE\n25,00 %\nEUR\n– 159 294,03\n0,00\n– 159 294,03\nPromotional Measures\n2011\nnon-respect of public procurement rules\nFLAT RATE\n25,00 %\nEUR\n– 159 932,04\n0,00\n– 159 932,04\nPromotional Measures\n2012\nnon-respect of public procurement rules\nFLAT RATE\n25,00 %\nEUR\n– 13 699,2\n0,00\n– 13 699,2\nTotal SK:\nEUR\n– 3 393 610,01\n0,00\n– 3 393 610,01\nCurrency\nAmount\nDeductions\nFinancial Impact\nEUR\n– 247 280 757,28\n– 6 953 545,49\n– 240 327 211,79",
  "extent": "E+W+S+N.I.",
  "status": null,
  "version": "current",
  "annotations": [],
  "outstanding_effects": [],
  "provenance": {
    "source": "legislation.gov.uk",
    "source_url": "https://www.legislation.gov.uk/eudn/2015/2098/annex/division/2",
    "retrieved_at": "2026-11-01T15:14:09.591364+00:00"
  },
  "licence": "Open Government Licence v3.0",
  "licence_url": "https://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/version/3/",
  "attribution": "Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Source: legislation.gov.uk, The National Archives."
}