{
  "url": "https://openlegislation.uk/eu-decision-2015-2098/annex/division-3",
  "json_url": "https://openlegislation.uk/eu-decision-2015-2098/annex/division-3.json",
  "legislation": "eudn/2015/2098",
  "legislation_title": "Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2015/2098 of 13 November 2015 excluding from European Union financing certain expenditure incurred by the Member States under the European Agricultural Guarantee Fund (EAGF) and under the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) (notified under document C(2015) 7716) (Only the Bulgarian, Czech, Danish, Dutch, English, French, German, Greek, Italian, Latvian, Lithuanian, Portuguese, Romanian, Slovak, Slovenian, Spanish, Swedish texts are authentic)",
  "legislation_url": "https://openlegislation.uk/eu-decision-2015-2098",
  "path": "annex/division/3",
  "kind": "division",
  "number": null,
  "heading": "Budget Item: 6711",
  "text": "Member State\nMeasure\nFY\nReason\nType\nCorrection %\nCurrency\nAmount\nDeductions\nFinancial Impact\nBG\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 1+3 — Investment orientated measures (2007-2013)\n2010\nweakness in cost reasonableness evaluation on part of the expenditure\nFLAT RATE\n10,00 %\nEUR\n– 1 492,07\n0,00\n– 1 492,07\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 1+3 — Investment orientated measures (2007-2013)\n2011\nweakness in cost reasonableness evaluation on part of the expenditure\nFLAT RATE\n10,00 %\nEUR\n– 12 519,61\n0,00\n– 12 519,61\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 1+3 — Investment orientated measures (2007-2013)\n2012\nweakness in cost reasonableness evaluation on part of the expenditure\nFLAT RATE\n10,00 %\nEUR\n– 90 416,27\n0,00\n– 90 416,27\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 1+3 — Investment orientated measures (2007-2013)\n2013\nweakness in cost reasonableness evaluation on part of the expenditure\nFLAT RATE\n10,00 %\nEUR\n– 62 350,34\n0,00\n– 62 350,34\nRural Development EAFRD Investment — private beneficiaries\n2014\nweakness in cost reasonableness evaluation on the part of the expenditure\nFLAT RATE\n10,00 %\nEUR\n– 150 179,56\n0,00\n– 150 179,56\nTotal BG:\nEUR\n– 316 957,85\n0,00\n– 316 957,85\nMember State\nMeasure\nFY\nReason\nType\nCorrection %\nCurrency\nAmount\nDeductions\nFinancial Impact\nCZ\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 1 — Measures with flat rate support (2007-2013)\n2013\nCorrection on the 15.10.2013 - 20.12.2013 period (based on data from Member State). Early retirement: transferees had to be under 40 years at the time of the transfer, vs under 50 years as required in Art 23(3)(b) of Reg. 1698/2005. Not mentioned in RDP.\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 14 647,37\n0,00\n– 14 647,37\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 1 — Measures with flat rate support (2007-2013)\n2011\nEarly retirement: transferees had to be under 40 years at the time of the transfer, vs under 50 years as required in Art 23(3)(b) of Reg. 1698/2005. During the audit no proof was presented that this rule had been approved in the RDP.\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 151 171,36\n0,00\n– 151 171,36\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 1 — Measures with flat rate support (2007-2013)\n2012\nEarly retirement: transferees had to be under 40 years at the time of the transfer, vs under 50 years as required in Art 23(3)(b) of Reg. 1698/2005. During the audit no proof was presented that this rule had been approved in the RDP.\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 212 512,83\n0,00\n– 212 512,83\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 1 — Measures with flat rate support (2007-2013)\n2013\nEarly retirement: transferees had to be under 40 years at the time of the transfer, vs under 50 years as required in Art 23(3)(b) of Reg. 1698/2005. During the audit no proof was presented that this rule had been approved in the RDP.\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 205 967,69\n0,00\n– 205 967,69\nTotal CZ:\nEUR\n– 584 299,25\n0,00\n– 584 299,25\nMember State\nMeasure\nFY\nReason\nType\nCorrection %\nCurrency\nAmount\nDeductions\nFinancial Impact\nDE\nRural Development EAFRD Investment — private beneficiaries\n2009\nweaknesses in application of selection criteria\nFLAT RATE\n10,00 %\nEUR\n– 290 608,56\n0,00\n– 290 608,56\nRural Development EAFRD Investment — private beneficiaries\n2010\nweaknesses in application of selection criteria\nFLAT RATE\n10,00 %\nEUR\n– 1 092 608,83\n0,00\n– 1 092 608,83\nRural Development EAFRD Investment — private beneficiaries\n2011\nweaknesses in application of selection criteria\nFLAT RATE\n10,00 %\nEUR\n– 1 981 768,94\n0,00\n– 1 981 768,94\nRural Development EAFRD Investment — private beneficiaries\n2012\nweaknesses in application of selection criteria\nFLAT RATE\n10,00 %\nEUR\n– 2 410 717,05\n0,00\n– 2 410 717,05\nRural Development EAFRD Investment — private beneficiaries\n2013\nweaknesses in application of selection criteria\nFLAT RATE\n10,00 %\nEUR\n– 1 947 327,97\n0,00\n– 1 947 327,97\nRural Development EAFRD Investment — public beneficiaries\n2014\nweaknesses in application of selection criteria\nFLAT RATE\n10,00 %\nEUR\n3 111,05\n0,00\n3 111,05\nTotal DE:\nEUR\n– 7 719 920,3\n0,00\n– 7 719 920,3\nMember State\nMeasure\nFY\nReason\nType\nCorrection %\nCurrency\nAmount\nDeductions\nFinancial Impact\nDK\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 4 LEADER (2007-2013)\n2012\nInsufficient administrative checks (Art. 24 of R. 65/2011) on reality of expenditure claimed, reasonableness of costs, public procurement and conflict of interest.\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 324 089,65\n0,00\n– 324 089,65\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 4 LEADER (2007-2013)\n2013\nInsufficient administrative checks (Art. 24 of R. 65/2011) on reality of expenditure claimed, reasonableness of costs, public procurement and conflict of interest.\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 428 721,76\n0,00\n– 428 721,76\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 4 LEADER (2007-2013)\n2014\nInsufficient administrative checks (Art. 24 of R. 65/2011) on reality of expenditure claimed, reasonableness of costs, public procurement and conflict of interest.\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 131 564,91\n0,00\n– 131 564,91\nTotal DK:\nEUR\n– 884 376,32\n0,00\n– 884 376,32\nMember State\nMeasure\nFY\nReason\nType\nCorrection %\nCurrency\nAmount\nDeductions\nFinancial Impact\nES\nCertification\n2011\ncorrection for the MLE — EAFRD IACS\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 55 030,29\n0,00\n– 55 030,29\nTotal ES:\nEUR\n– 55 030,29\n0,00\n– 55 030,29\nMember State\nMeasure\nFY\nReason\nType\nCorrection %\nCurrency\nAmount\nDeductions\nFinancial Impact\nFR\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, non area related measures)\n2012\nin situ visits not carried out systematically (measure 216)\nFLAT RATE\n2,00 %\nEUR\n– 11 434,58\n0,00\n– 11 434,58\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, non area related measures)\n2013\nin situ visits not carried out systematically (measure 216)\nFLAT RATE\n2,00 %\nEUR\n– 33 209,47\n0,00\n– 33 209,47\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, non area related measures)\n2014\nin situ visits not carried out systematically (measure 216)\nFLAT RATE\n2,00 %\nEUR\n– 50 695,41\n0,00\n– 50 695,41\nTotal FR:\nEUR\n– 95 339,46\n0,00\n– 95 339,46\nMember State\nMeasure\nFY\nReason\nType\nCorrection %\nCurrency\nAmount\nDeductions\nFinancial Impact\nGB\nCertification\n2013\nMaterial error in EAFRD Non-IACS\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 540 233,64\n0,00\n– 540 233,64\nCertification\n2013\nMaterial error in EAFRD-Non-IACS\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 25 764,39\n0,00\n– 25 764,39\nCertification\n2013\nMaterial error in EAFRD Non-IACS\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 25 390,97\n0,00\n– 25 390,97\nTotal GB:\nEUR\n– 591 389,0\n0,00\n– 591 389,0\nMember State\nMeasure\nFY\nReason\nType\nCorrection %\nCurrency\nAmount\nDeductions\nFinancial Impact\nIE\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 4 LEADER (2007-2013)\n2012\nBusiness creation and development measure (Art. 54 of Reg. 1698/2005) — insufficient checks of micro-enterprise status\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 200 155,65\n0,00\n– 200 155,65\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 4 LEADER (2007-2013)\n2013\nBusiness creation and development measure (Art. 54 of Reg. 1698/2005) — insufficient checks of micro-enterprise status\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 478 780,92\n0,00\n– 478 780,92\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 4 LEADER (2007-2013)\n2014\nBusiness creation and development measure (Art. 54 of Reg. 1698/2005) — insufficient checks of micro-enterprise status\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 549 115,18\n0,00\n– 549 115,18\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 4 LEADER (2007-2013)\n2011\nWeaknesses in the application of procurement rules — contract awarding based on unclear criteria in one individual file\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 4 852,32\n0,00\n– 4 852,32\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area related measures)\n2009\nCY 2008, LPIS Weaknesses — RDA (LFA)\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 1 714 399,67\n0,00\n– 1 714 399,67\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area related measures)\n2009\nCY 2008, LPIS Weaknesses — RDA (REPS & AEOS)\nFLAT RATE\n2,00 %\nEUR\n– 66 865,56\n0,00\n– 66 865,56\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area related measures)\n2009\nCY 2009, LPIS Weaknesses — RDA (LFA)\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 1 520 656,39\n0,00\n– 1 520 656,39\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area related measures)\n2009\nCY 2009, LPIS Weaknesses — RDA (REPS & AEOS)\nFLAT RATE\n2,00 %\nEUR\n– 179 980,41\n0,00\n– 179 980,41\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area related measures)\n2010\nCY 2010, LPIS Weaknesses — RDA (LFA)\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 1 364 366,71\n0,00\n– 1 364 366,71\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area related measures)\n2010\nCY 2010, LPIS Weaknesses — RDA (REPS & AEOS)\nFLAT RATE\n2,00 %\nEUR\n– 236 073,74\n0,00\n– 236 073,74\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area related measures)\n2011\nCY 2011, LPIS Weaknesses — RDA (LFA)\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 1 333 446,32\n0,00\n– 1 333 446,32\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area related measures)\n2011\nCY 2011, LPIS Weaknesses — RDA (REPS & AEOS)\nFLAT RATE\n2,00 %\nEUR\n– 287 555,15\n0,00\n– 287 555,15\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area related measures)\n2012\nCY 2012, LPIS Weaknesses — RDA (LFA)\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 1 340 180,07\n0,00\n– 1 340 180,07\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area related measures)\n2012\nCY 2012, LPIS Weaknesses — RDA (REPS & AEOS)\nFLAT RATE\n2,00 %\nEUR\n– 328 219,99\n0,00\n– 328 219,99\nCertification\n2013\nEAFRD IACS known error\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 1 211,83\n0,00\n– 1 211,83\nTotal IE:\nEUR\n– 9 605 859,91\n0,00\n– 9 605 859,91\nMember State\nMeasure\nFY\nReason\nType\nCorrection %\nCurrency\nAmount\nDeductions\nFinancial Impact\nIT\nCertification\n2009\nbad application of regulations\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 125 974,5\n0,00\n– 125 974,5\nCross Compliance\n2010\nPartial coverage of SMR1 and SMR5, CY 2009\nFLAT RATE\n2,00 %\nEUR\n– 7 347,29\n0,00\n– 7 347,29\nCross Compliance\n2011\nPartial coverage of SMR1 and SMR5, CY 2010\nFLAT RATE\n2,00 %\nEUR\n– 20 685,88\n0,00\n– 20 685,88\nCross Compliance\n2012\nPartial coverage of SMR1 and SMR5, CY 2011\nFLAT RATE\n2,00 %\nEUR\n– 32 511,67\n0,00\n– 32 511,67\nCross Compliance\n2009\nSerious deficiencies in the cross-compliance controls carry-out by the veterinary services, farmers with animals, CY 2008\nFLAT RATE\n10,00 %\nEUR\n– 573 661,08\n– 892,12\n– 572 768,96\nCross Compliance\n2010\nSerious deficiencies in the cross-compliance controls carry-out by the veterinary services, farmers with animals, CY 2009\nFLAT RATE\n10,00 %\nEUR\n– 800 975,78\n0,00\n– 800 975,78\nCross Compliance\n2011\nSerious deficiencies in the cross-compliance controls carry-out by the veterinary services, farmers with animals, CY 2010\nFLAT RATE\n10,00 %\nEUR\n– 762 639,35\n0,00\n– 762 639,35\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area related measures)\n2013\nWeaknesses in administrative and on-the-spot checks of livestock density. Late on-the-spot checks. Weaknesses in supervision of delegated bodies.\nFLAT RATE\n2,00 %\nEUR\n– 111 793,76\n0,00\n– 111 793,76\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area related measures)\n2014\nWeaknesses in administrative and on-the-spot checks of livestock density. Late on-the-spot checks. Weaknesses in supervision of delegated bodies.\nFLAT RATE\n2,00 %\nEUR\n– 61 496,87\n0,00\n– 61 496,87\nCross Compliance\n2011\nWeaknesses in control and sanctions of animal related SMRs, CY 2010\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 46 561,33\n– 1 119,09\n– 45 442,24\nCross Compliance\n2012\nWeaknesses in control and sanctions of animal related SMRs, CY 2011\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 76 916,15\n– 953,50\n– 75 962,65\nCross Compliance\n2009\nWeaknesses in controls of SMR1 and 5, in cross-reporting from eligibility checks, farmers without animals, CY 2008\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 234 303,18\n0,00\n– 234 303,18\nCross Compliance\n2010\nWeaknesses in controls of SMR1 and 5, in cross-reporting from eligibility checks, farmers without animals, CY 2009\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 347 673,88\n0,00\n– 347 673,88\nCross Compliance\n2011\nWeaknesses in controls of SMR1 and 5, in cross-reporting from eligibility checks, farmers without animals, CY 2010\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 352 136,53\n0,00\n– 352 136,53\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area related measures)\n2012\nWeakness in the verification of livestock density during the on-the-spot checks\nFLAT RATE\n2,00 %\nEUR\n– 4,65\n0,00\n– 4,65\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area related measures)\n2013\nWeakness in the verification of livestock density during the on-the-spot checks\nFLAT RATE\n2,00 %\nEUR\n– 313 048,72\n0,00\n– 313 048,72\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area related measures)\n2014\nWeakness in the verification of livestock density during the on-the-spot checks\nFLAT RATE\n2,00 %\nEUR\n– 352 773,96\n0,00\n– 352 773,96\nTotal IT:\nEUR\n– 4 220 504,58\n– 2 964,71\n– 4 217 539,87\nMember State\nMeasure\nFY\nReason\nType\nCorrection %\nCurrency\nAmount\nDeductions\nFinancial Impact\nLT\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area related measures)\n2010\nWeakness in quality of LPIS and cross-checks, 2009\nESTIMATED AMOUNT\nEUR\n– 1 145 990,95\n– 51 831,0\n– 1 094 159,95\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area related measures)\n2011\nWeakness in quality of LPIS and cross-checks, 2010\nESTIMATED AMOUNT\nEUR\n– 412 802,18\n– 79 666,44\n– 333 135,74\nTotal LT:\nEUR\n– 1 558 793,13\n– 131 497,44\n– 1 427 295,69\nMember State\nMeasure\nFY\nReason\nType\nCorrection %\nCurrency\nAmount\nDeductions\nFinancial Impact\nLV\nRural Development EAFRD Technical Assistance (2007-2013)\n2013\nIncorrect application of a public procurement procedure: 25 % correction for project ‘Maintenance and development of the IT system LAD IS’ (see also DAS case — PF-5632/13 from ECA)\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 498 505,85\n0,00\n– 498 505,85\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area related measures)\n2011\nLack of verification of livestock densities during on the spot checks\nEXTRAPOLATED\n100,00 %\nEUR\n– 29 310,56\n0,00\n– 29 310,56\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area related measures)\n2012\nLack of verification of livestock densities during on the spot checks\nEXTRAPOLATED\n100,00 %\nEUR\n– 65 278,19\n0,00\n– 65 278,19\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area related measures)\n2013\nLack of verification of livestock densities during on the spot checks\nEXTRAPOLATED\n100,00 %\nEUR\n– 45 310,95\n0,00\n– 45 310,95\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area related measures)\n2014\nLack of verification of livestock densities during on the spot checks\nEXTRAPOLATED\n100,00 %\nEUR\n– 30 357,83\n0,00\n– 30 357,83\nTotal LV:\nEUR\n– 668 763,38\n0,00\n– 668 763,38\nMember State\nMeasure\nFY\nReason\nType\nCorrection %\nCurrency\nAmount\nDeductions\nFinancial Impact\nNL\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area related measures)\n2010\nWeakness in the on the spot checks\nFLAT RATE\n2,00 %\nEUR\n– 86,40\n0,00\n– 86,40\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area related measures)\n2011\nWeakness in the on the spot checks\nFLAT RATE\n2,00 %\nEUR\n– 330 117,34\n– 8 059,23\n– 322 058,11\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area related measures)\n2012\nWeakness in the on the spot checks\nFLAT RATE\n2,00 %\nEUR\n– 571 007,66\n– 9 020,17\n– 561 987,49\nTotal NL:\nEUR\n– 901 211,4\n– 17 079,4\n– 884 132,0\nMember State\nMeasure\nFY\nReason\nType\nCorrection %\nCurrency\nAmount\nDeductions\nFinancial Impact\nPT\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 1+3 — Investment orientated measures (2007-2013)\n2012\nDeficiency in public procurement procedures\nONE OFF\n0,00 %\nEUR\n– 755 474,0\n0,00\n– 755 474,0\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 1 — Measures with flat rate support (2007-2013)\n2011\nNo proper risk analysis\nFLAT RATE\n2,00 %\nEUR\n– 591 526,25\n0,00\n– 591 526,25\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 1 — Measures with flat rate support (2007-2013)\n2012\nNo proper risk analysis\nFLAT RATE\n2,00 %\nEUR\n– 222 147,37\n0,00\n– 222 147,37\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 4 LEADER (2007-2013)\n2011\nProject not implemented.\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 2 836,62\n0,00\n– 2 836,62\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 4 LEADER (2007-2013)\n2011\nProject not properly implemented.\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 48 188,16\n0,00\n– 48 188,16\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 1+3 — Investment orientated measures (2007-2013)\n2011\nSampling of on-the-spot checks — inadequate population\nFLAT RATE\n2,00 %\nEUR\n– 600 000,0\n– 600 000,0\n0,00\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 1+3 — Investment orientated measures (2007-2013)\n2012\nSampling of on-the-spot checks — inadequate population\nFLAT RATE\n2,00 %\nEUR\n– 399 652,45\n– 399 652,45\n0,00\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 1+3 — Investment orientated measures (2007-2013)\n2011\nSampling of the on-the-spot checks — Inadequate population\nFLAT RATE\n2,00 %\nEUR\n– 1 339 403,96\n0,00\n– 1 339 403,96\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 1+3 — Investment orientated measures (2007-2013)\n2012\nSampling of the on-the-spot checks — Inadequate population\nFLAT RATE\n2,00 %\nEUR\n– 700 538,13\n0,00\n– 700 538,13\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 1+3 — Investment orientated measures (2007-2013)\n2010\nSME criteria not verified\nFLAT RATE\n2,00 %\nEUR\n– 300 370,16\n0,00\n– 300 370,16\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 1+3 — Investment orientated measures (2007-2013)\n2011\nSME criteria not verified\nFLAT RATE\n2,00 %\nEUR\n– 916 906,93\n0,00\n– 916 906,93\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 1+3 — Investment orientated measures (2007-2013)\n2012\nSME criteria not verified\nFLAT RATE\n2,00 %\nEUR\n– 914 418,58\n0,00\n– 914 418,58\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 1+3 — Investment orientated measures (2007-2013)\n2013\nSME criteria not verified\nFLAT RATE\n2,00 %\nEUR\n– 1 014 498,08\n0,00\n– 1 014 498,08\nRural Development EAFRD Investment — private beneficiaries\n2014\nSME criteria not verified\nFLAT RATE\n2,00 %\nEUR\n– 286 087,86\n0,00\n– 286 087,86\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area related measures)\n2010\nWeakness in LPIS, RD CY 2009\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n72 795,61\n0,00\n72 795,61\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area related measures)\n2010\nWeakness in LPIS, RD CY 2010\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n166 439,32\n0,00\n166 439,32\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area related measures)\n2011\nWeakness in LPIS, RD CY 2010\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n72 077,07\n0,00\n72 077,07\nTotal PT:\nEUR\n– 7 780 736,55\n– 999 652,45\n– 6 781 084,1\nMember State\nMeasure\nFY\nReason\nType\nCorrection %\nCurrency\nAmount\nDeductions\nFinancial Impact\nSE\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area related measures)\n2010\nfailure to check compliance with manure limitations (Natural handicap scheme)\nFLAT RATE\n2,00 %\nEUR\n– 354 006,62\n0,00\n– 354 006,62\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area related measures)\n2011\nfailure to check compliance with manure limitations (Natural handicap scheme)\nFLAT RATE\n2,00 %\nEUR\n– 827 791,97\n0,00\n– 827 791,97\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area related measures)\n2012\nfailure to check compliance with manure limitations (Natural handicap scheme)\nFLAT RATE\n2,00 %\nEUR\n– 721 063,75\n0,00\n– 721 063,75\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area related measures)\n2013\nfailure to check compliance with manure limitations (Natural handicap scheme)\nFLAT RATE\n2,00 %\nEUR\n– 209 252,91\n0,00\n– 209 252,91\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area related measures)\n2010\non-the-spot checks failed to count bovines under the natural handicap scheme and two agri-environmental sub-measures\nFLAT RATE\n2,00 %\nEUR\n– 238 730,6\n– 85 805,23\n– 152 925,37\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area related measures)\n2011\non-the-spot checks failed to count bovines under the natural handicap scheme and two agri-environmental sub-measures\nFLAT RATE\n2,00 %\nEUR\n– 594 957,98\n– 66 052,41\n– 528 905,57\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area related measures)\n2012\non-the-spot checks failed to count bovines under the natural handicap scheme and two agri-environmental sub-measures\nFLAT RATE\n2,00 %\nEUR\n– 559 641,69\n– 93 237,95\n– 466 403,74\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area related measures)\n2013\non-the-spot checks failed to count bovines under the natural handicap scheme and two agri-environmental sub-measures\nFLAT RATE\n2,00 %\nEUR\n– 189 317,63\n– 9,76\n– 189 307,87\nTotal SE:\nEUR\n– 3 694 763,15\n– 245 105,35\n– 3 449 657,8\nCurrency\nAmount\nDeductions\nFinancial Impact\nEUR\n– 38 677 944,57\n– 1 396 299,35\n– 37 281 645,22",
  "extent": "E+W+S+N.I.",
  "status": null,
  "version": "current",
  "annotations": [],
  "outstanding_effects": [],
  "provenance": {
    "source": "legislation.gov.uk",
    "source_url": "https://www.legislation.gov.uk/eudn/2015/2098/annex/division/3",
    "retrieved_at": "2026-11-01T15:14:09.591364+00:00"
  },
  "licence": "Open Government Licence v3.0",
  "licence_url": "https://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/version/3/",
  "attribution": "Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Source: legislation.gov.uk, The National Archives."
}