{
  "url": "https://openlegislation.uk/eu-decision-2016-1059/annex/division-4",
  "json_url": "https://openlegislation.uk/eu-decision-2016-1059/annex/division-4.json",
  "legislation": "eudn/2016/1059",
  "legislation_title": "Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2016/1059 of 20 June 2016 excluding from European Union financing certain expenditure incurred by the Member States under the European Agricultural Guarantee Fund (EAGF) and under the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) (notified under document C(2016) 3753) (only the Bulgarian, Czech, Danish, Dutch, English, French, German, Italian, Latvian, Lithuanian, Portuguese, Slovenian, Spanish, Swedish texts are authentic)",
  "legislation_url": "https://openlegislation.uk/eu-decision-2016-1059",
  "path": "annex/division/4",
  "kind": "division",
  "number": null,
  "heading": "Budget Item: 6701",
  "text": "Member State\nMeasure\nFY\nReason\nType\nCorrection %\nCurrency\nAmount\nDeductions\nFinancial Impact\nBG\nDecoupled Direct Aids\n2013\nWeaknesses in the on-the-spot checks and sanctions and payments calculations — CY 2012\nONE-OFF\nEUR\n– 167 489,0\n0,00\n– 167 489,0\nDecoupled Direct Aids\n2014\nWeaknesses in the on-the-spot checks and sanctions and payments calculations — CY 2012\nONE-OFF\nEUR\n– 131,00\n0,00\n– 131,00\nDecoupled Direct Aids\n2014\nWeaknesses in the on-the-spot checks and sanctions and payments calculations — CY 2013\nONE-OFF\nEUR\n– 250 296,0\n0,00\n– 250 296,0\nDecoupled Direct Aids\n2015\nWeaknesses in the on-the-spot checks and sanctions and payments calculations — CY 2014\nONE-OFF\nEUR\n– 263 217,0\n0,00\n– 263 217,0\nTotal BG:\nEUR\n– 681 133,0\n0,00\n– 681 133,0\nMember State\nMeasure\nFY\nReason\nType\nCorrection %\nCurrency\nAmount\nDeductions\nFinancial Impact\nCZ\nDecoupled Direct Aids\n2013\nClaim year 2012: Deficiency in the LPIS update process, Deficiency in the risk analysis, No extension or extrapolation in case of overdeclaration > 3 %\nONE-OFF\nEUR\n– 112 441,28\n0,00\n– 112 441,28\nDecoupled Direct Aids\n2014\nClaim year 2013: Deficiency in the LPIS update process, Deficiency in the risk analysis, No extension or extrapolation in case of overdeclaration > 3 %.\nONE-OFF\nEUR\n– 164 086,21\n0,00\n– 164 086,21\nDecoupled Direct Aids\n2015\nClaim year 2014: Deficiency in the LPIS update process, Deficiency in the risk analysis, No extension or extrapolation in case of overdeclaration > 3 %\nONE-OFF\nEUR\n– 185 990,34\n0,00\n– 185 990,34\nCross Compliance\n2011\nIncorrect control of the identification and registration requirements, farmer with animals, CY 2010\nFLAT RATE\n10,00 %\nEUR\n– 5 297 424,42\n– 41,95\n– 5 297 382,47\nCross Compliance\n2012\nIncorrect control of the identification and registration requirements, farmer with animals, CY 2011\nFLAT RATE\n10,00 %\nEUR\n– 5 947 911,0\n– 0,69\n– 5 947 910,31\nCross Compliance\n2013\nIncorrect control of the identification and registration requirements, farmer with animals, CY 2012\nFLAT RATE\n10,00 %\nEUR\n– 6 473 886,96\n– 1 124,41\n– 6 472 762,55\nCross Compliance\n2014\nIncorrect control of the identification and registration requirements, farmer with animals, CY 2013\nFLAT RATE\n10,00 %\nEUR\n– 6 852 121,42\n– 1 640,86\n– 6 850 480,56\nWine — Investment\n2011\nInsufficient level of on-the-spot checks\nFLAT RATE\n10,00 %\nEUR\n– 124 003,47\n0,00\n– 124 003,47\nWine — Investment\n2012\nInsufficient level of on-the-spot checks\nFLAT RATE\n10,00 %\nEUR\n– 207 479,98\n0,00\n– 207 479,98\nWine — Investment\n2013\nInsufficient level of on-the-spot checks\nFLAT RATE\n10,00 %\nEUR\n– 201 933,62\n0,00\n– 201 933,62\nWine — Investment\n2014\nInsufficient level of on-the-spot checks\nFLAT RATE\n10,00 %\nEUR\n– 103 099,13\n0,00\n– 103 099,13\nCross Compliance\n2011\nOne GAEC not defined and limited scope of the control for SMR5, farmer without animals, CY 2010\nFLAT RATE\n2,00 %\nEUR\n– 1 059 484,88\n– 8,39\n– 1 059 476,49\nCross Compliance\n2012\nOne GAEC not defined and limited scope of the control for SMR5, farmer without animals, CY 2011\nFLAT RATE\n2,00 %\nEUR\n– 1 189 582,2\n– 0,14\n– 1 189 582,06\nCross Compliance\n2013\nOne GAEC not defined and limited scope of the control for SMR5, farmer without animals, CY 2012\nFLAT RATE\n2,00 %\nEUR\n– 1 294 777,39\n– 224,88\n– 1 294 552,51\nCross Compliance\n2014\nOne GAEC not defined and limited scope of the control for SMR5, farmer without animals, CY 2013\nFLAT RATE\n2,00 %\nEUR\n– 1 370 424,28\n0,00\n– 1 370 424,28\nTotal CZ:\nEUR\n– 30 584 646,58\n– 3 041,32\n– 30 581 605,26\nMember State\nMeasure\nFY\nReason\nType\nCorrection %\nCurrency\nAmount\nDeductions\nFinancial Impact\nDE\nCertification\n2013\nFinancial correction for not recovered financial errors from previous years\nONE-OFF\nEUR\n– 46 753,71\n0,00\n– 46 753,71\nPromotion Measures\n2010\nnon-compliance with the provision on procurement\nFLAT RATE\n100,00 %\nEUR\n– 140 636,87\n– 632,38\n– 140 004,49\nPromotion Measures\n2011\nnon-compliance with the provision on procurement\nFLAT RATE\n100,00 %\nEUR\n– 331 758,14\n– 168,23\n– 331 589,91\nPromotion Measures\n2012\nnon-compliance with the provision on procurement\nFLAT RATE\n100,00 %\nEUR\n– 346 390,91\n– 382,01\n– 346 008,9\nPromotion Measures\n2013\nnon-compliance with the provision on procurement\nFLAT RATE\n100,00 %\nEUR\n– 67 459,69\n– 33,69\n– 67 426,0\nDecoupled Direct Aids\n2013\nWeaknesses in the effectiveness of the control method and quality of the on-the-spot checks in CY2012\nONE-OFF\nEUR\n– 224 492,66\n0,00\n– 224 492,66\nDecoupled Direct Aids\n2014\nWeaknesses in the effectiveness of the control method and quality of the on-the-spot checks in CY2013\nONE-OFF\nEUR\n– 186 360,48\n0,00\n– 186 360,48\nTotal DE:\nEUR\n– 1 343 852,46\n– 1 216,31\n– 1 342 636,15\nMember State\nMeasure\nFY\nReason\nType\nCorrection %\nCurrency\nAmount\nDeductions\nFinancial Impact\nES\nIrregularities\n2013\nDelays in the starting-up of the recovery procedures and lack of diligence in the follow-up of debts\nONE-OFF\nEUR\n– 364 397,21\n0,00\n– 364 397,21\nCertification\n2011\nEAGF non-IACS and EAFRD non-IACS known errors. Rectification of correction found in ad hoc 48\nONE-OFF\nEUR\n3 523,35\n0,00\n3 523,35\nCertification\n2013\nEAGF non-IACS and EAFRD non-IACS known errors. Rectification of correction found in ad hoc 48\nONE-OFF\nEUR\n19 304,02\n0,00\n19 304,02\nCross Compliance\n2010\nInadequate instruction for controls, deficiencies in the scope of the controls, 2009\nFLAT RATE\n10,00 %\nEUR\n– 115 116,22\n– 3 067,03\n– 112 049,19\nCross Compliance\n2011\nInadequate instruction for controls, deficiencies in the scope of the controls, 2009\nFLAT RATE\n10,00 %\nEUR\n– 10 039,58\n0,00\n– 10 039,58\nCross Compliance\n2012\nInadequate instruction for controls, deficiencies in the scope of the controls, 2009\nFLAT RATE\n10,00 %\nEUR\n– 202,56\n0,00\n– 202,56\nCross Compliance\n2011\nInadequate instruction for controls, deficiencies in the scope of the controls, 2010\nFLAT RATE\n10,00 %\nEUR\n– 1 779 083,63\n– 4 749,0\n– 1 774 334,63\nCross Compliance\n2012\nInadequate instruction for controls, deficiencies in the scope of the controls, 2010\nFLAT RATE\n10,00 %\nEUR\n– 1 466,85\n0,00\n– 1 466,85\nCross Compliance\n2013\nInadequate instruction for controls, deficiencies in the scope of the controls, 2010\nFLAT RATE\n10,00 %\nEUR\n– 408,69\n0,00\n– 408,69\nCross Compliance\n2012\nInadequate instruction for controls, deficiencies in the scope of the controls, 2011\nFLAT RATE\n10,00 %\nEUR\n– 1 796 132,37\n– 8 320,41\n– 1 787 811,96\nCross Compliance\n2013\nInadequate instruction for controls, deficiencies in the scope of the controls, 2011\nFLAT RATE\n10,00 %\nEUR\n– 379,25\n0,00\n– 379,25\nCross Compliance\n2013\nInadequate instruction for controls, deficiencies in the scope of the controls, 2012\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 921 486,77\n0,00\n– 921 486,77\nCertification\n2014\nKnown error calculated based on systemic deficiencies in the substantive testing of the EAGF non-IACS population.\nONE-OFF\nEUR\n– 555 280,17\n0,00\n– 555 280,17\nCertification\n2014\nKnown error identified in the EAFRD non-IACS. Non-application of financial discipline.\nONE-OFF\nEUR\n– 84 578,54\n0,00\n– 84 578,54\nDecoupled Direct Aids\n2010\nLack of recovery, CY2009\nONE-OFF\nEUR\n– 1 797 657,81\n0,00\n– 1 797 657,81\nDecoupled Direct Aids\n2011\nLack of recovery, CY2010\nONE-OFF\nEUR\n– 2 476 822,58\n0,00\n– 2 476 822,58\nDecoupled Direct Aids\n2012\nLack of recovery, CY2011\nONE-OFF\nEUR\n– 2 041 501,02\n0,00\n– 2 041 501,02\nFruit and Vegetables — Operational Programmes\n2010\nRecognition — outsourcing: shortcomings in controls\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 146 583,54\n– 17 707,29\n– 128 876,25\nFruit and Vegetables — Operational Programmes\n2011\nRecognition — outsourcing: shortcomings in controls\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 173 015,89\n– 20 900,32\n– 152 115,57\nDecoupled Direct Aids\n2013\nWeaknesses in the quality of on-the-spot checks and in the calculation of payment and sanctions (claim year 2012)\nONE-OFF\nEUR\n– 237 956,45\n0,00\n– 237 956,45\nDecoupled Direct Aids\n2014\nWeaknesses in the quality of on-the-spot checks and in the calculation of payment and sanctions (claim year 2012)\nONE-OFF\nEUR\n– 35,09\n0,00\n– 35,09\nDecoupled Direct Aids\n2014\nWeaknesses in the quality of on-the-spot checks (claim year 2013)\nONE-OFF\nEUR\n– 5 437,95\n0,00\n– 5 437,95\nDecoupled Direct Aids\n2010\nWeakness in LPIS (permanent pasture) CY 2009\nFLAT RATE\n0,41 %\nEUR\n– 36 254,13\n0,00\n– 36 254,13\nDecoupled Direct Aids\n2010\nWeakness in LPIS (permanent pasture) CY 2009\nFLAT RATE\n1,27 %\nEUR\n– 491 140,74\n0,00\n– 491 140,74\nDecoupled Direct Aids\n2010\nWeakness in LPIS (permanent pasture) CY 2009\nFLAT RATE\n1,87 %\nEUR\n– 5 206 315,05\n0,00\n– 5 206 315,05\nDecoupled Direct Aids\n2010\nWeakness in LPIS (permanent pasture) CY 2009\nFLAT RATE\n2,45 %\nEUR\n– 525 444,92\n0,00\n– 525 444,92\nDecoupled Direct Aids\n2010\nWeakness in LPIS (permanent pasture) CY 2009\nFLAT RATE\n2,71 %\nEUR\n– 193 701,07\n0,00\n– 193 701,07\nDecoupled Direct Aids\n2010\nWeakness in LPIS (permanent pasture) CY 2009\nFLAT RATE\n2,84 %\nEUR\n– 3 385 206,63\n0,00\n– 3 385 206,63\nDecoupled Direct Aids\n2010\nWeakness in LPIS (permanent pasture) CY 2009\nFLAT RATE\n2,97 %\nEUR\n– 274 558,17\n0,00\n– 274 558,17\nDecoupled Direct Aids\n2010\nWeakness in LPIS (permanent pasture) CY 2009\nFLAT RATE\n3,03 %\nEUR\n– 6 425 414,59\n0,00\n– 6 425 414,59\nDecoupled Direct Aids\n2010\nWeakness in LPIS (permanent pasture) CY 2009\nFLAT RATE\n3,32 %\nEUR\n– 264 285,02\n0,00\n– 264 285,02\nDecoupled Direct Aids\n2010\nWeakness in LPIS (permanent pasture) CY 2009\nFLAT RATE\n3,53 %\nEUR\n– 370 297,5\n0,00\n– 370 297,5\nDecoupled Direct Aids\n2010\nWeakness in LPIS (permanent pasture) CY 2009\nFLAT RATE\n4,34 %\nEUR\n– 5 810 700,42\n0,00\n– 5 810 700,42\nDecoupled Direct Aids\n2011\nWeakness in LPIS (permanent pasture) CY 2010\nFLAT RATE\n1,59 %\nEUR\n– 140 897,44\n0,00\n– 140 897,44\nDecoupled Direct Aids\n2011\nWeakness in LPIS (permanent pasture) CY 2010\nFLAT RATE\n3,58 %\nEUR\n– 12 557 181,35\n0,00\n– 12 557 181,35\nDecoupled Direct Aids\n2011\nWeakness in LPIS (permanent pasture) CY 2010\nFLAT RATE\n3,80 %\nEUR\n– 1 604 161,19\n0,00\n– 1 604 161,19\nDecoupled Direct Aids\n2011\nWeakness in LPIS (permanent pasture) CY 2010\nFLAT RATE\n4,46 %\nEUR\n– 7 281 180,73\n0,00\n– 7 281 180,73\nDecoupled Direct Aids\n2011\nWeakness in LPIS (permanent pasture) CY 2010\nFLAT RATE\n4,99 %\nEUR\n– 521 889,14\n0,00\n– 521 889,14\nDecoupled Direct Aids\n2011\nWeakness in LPIS (permanent pasture) CY 2010\nFLAT RATE\n5,86 %\nEUR\n– 14 705 686,08\n0,00\n– 14 705 686,08\nDecoupled Direct Aids\n2011\nWeakness in LPIS (permanent pasture) CY 2010\nFLAT RATE\n6,40 %\nEUR\n– 754 883,66\n0,00\n– 754 883,66\nDecoupled Direct Aids\n2011\nWeakness in LPIS (permanent pasture) CY 2010\nFLAT RATE\n6,52 %\nEUR\n– 1 465 916,24\n0,00\n– 1 465 916,24\nDecoupled Direct Aids\n2011\nWeakness in LPIS (permanent pasture) CY 2010\nFLAT RATE\n7,68 %\nEUR\n– 1 054 399,87\n0,00\n– 1 054 399,87\nDecoupled Direct Aids\n2011\nWeakness in LPIS (permanent pasture) CY 2010\nFLAT RATE\n8,60 %\nEUR\n– 898 074,78\n0,00\n– 898 074,78\nDecoupled Direct Aids\n2011\nWeakness in LPIS (permanent pasture) CY 2010\nFLAT RATE\n10,04 %\nEUR\n– 17 872 503,33\n0,00\n– 17 872 503,33\nDecoupled Direct Aids\n2012\nWeakness in LPIS (permanent pasture) CY2011\nFLAT RATE\n1,53 %\nEUR\n– 129 372,04\n0,00\n– 129 372,04\nDecoupled Direct Aids\n2012\nWeakness in LPIS (permanent pasture) CY2011\nFLAT RATE\n3,52 %\nEUR\n– 1 670 394,11\n0,00\n– 1 670 394,11\nDecoupled Direct Aids\n2012\nWeakness in LPIS (permanent pasture) CY2011\nFLAT RATE\n3,61 %\nEUR\n– 12 569 567,63\n0,00\n– 12 569 567,63\nDecoupled Direct Aids\n2012\nWeakness in LPIS (permanent pasture) CY2011\nFLAT RATE\n4,40 %\nEUR\n– 457 993,13\n0,00\n– 457 993,13\nDecoupled Direct Aids\n2012\nWeakness in LPIS (permanent pasture) CY2011\nFLAT RATE\n4,41 %\nEUR\n– 6 222 534,74\n0,00\n– 6 222 534,74\nDecoupled Direct Aids\n2012\nWeakness in LPIS (permanent pasture) CY2011\nFLAT RATE\n5,47 %\nEUR\n– 14 047 831,11\n0,00\n– 14 047 831,11\nDecoupled Direct Aids\n2012\nWeakness in LPIS (permanent pasture) CY2011\nFLAT RATE\n6,42 %\nEUR\n– 1 460 940,66\n0,00\n– 1 460 940,66\nDecoupled Direct Aids\n2012\nWeakness in LPIS (permanent pasture) CY2011\nFLAT RATE\n7,67 %\nEUR\n– 1 039 427,27\n0,00\n– 1 039 427,27\nDecoupled Direct Aids\n2012\nWeakness in LPIS (permanent pasture) CY2011\nFLAT RATE\n8,71 %\nEUR\n– 896 518,36\n0,00\n– 896 518,36\nDecoupled Direct Aids\n2012\nWeakness in LPIS (permanent pasture) CY2011\nFLAT RATE\n8,84 %\nEUR\n– 1 073 434,31\n0,00\n– 1 073 434,31\nDecoupled Direct Aids\n2012\nWeakness in LPIS (permanent pasture) CY2011\nFLAT RATE\n10,06 %\nEUR\n– 18 587 226,24\n0,00\n– 18 587 226,24\nDecoupled Direct Aids\n2013\nWeakness in LPIS (permanent pasture) CY 2012\nFLAT RATE\n1,52 %\nEUR\n– 282 433,44\n0,00\n– 282 433,44\nDecoupled Direct Aids\n2013\nWeakness in LPIS (permanent pasture) CY 2012\nFLAT RATE\n2,73 %\nEUR\n– 2 189 472,27\n0,00\n– 2 189 472,27\nDecoupled Direct Aids\n2013\nWeakness in LPIS (permanent pasture) CY 2012\nFLAT RATE\n3,47 %\nEUR\n– 436 427,69\n0,00\n– 436 427,69\nDecoupled Direct Aids\n2013\nWeakness in LPIS (permanent pasture) CY 2012\nFLAT RATE\n3,60 %\nEUR\n– 13 607 317,98\n0,00\n– 13 607 317,98\nDecoupled Direct Aids\n2013\nWeakness in LPIS (permanent pasture) CY 2012\nFLAT RATE\n4,34 %\nEUR\n– 6 859 547,08\n0,00\n– 6 859 547,08\nDecoupled Direct Aids\n2013\nWeakness in LPIS (permanent pasture) CY 2012\nFLAT RATE\n5,23 %\nEUR\n– 14 573 066,77\n0,00\n– 14 573 066,77\nDecoupled Direct Aids\n2013\nWeakness in LPIS (permanent pasture) CY 2012\nFLAT RATE\n5,67 %\nEUR\n– 1 481 797,81\n0,00\n– 1 481 797,81\nDecoupled Direct Aids\n2013\nWeakness in LPIS (permanent pasture) CY 2012\nFLAT RATE\n8,11 %\nEUR\n– 937 029,74\n0,00\n– 937 029,74\nDecoupled Direct Aids\n2013\nWeakness in LPIS (permanent pasture) CY 2012\nFLAT RATE\n8,35 %\nEUR\n– 1 152 945,89\n0,00\n– 1 152 945,89\nDecoupled Direct Aids\n2013\nWeakness in LPIS (permanent pasture) CY 2012\nFLAT RATE\n8,47 %\nEUR\n– 1 067 848,09\n0,00\n– 1 067 848,09\nDecoupled Direct Aids\n2013\nWeakness in LPIS (permanent pasture) CY 2012\nFLAT RATE\n10,09 %\nEUR\n– 18 550 881,56\n0,00\n– 18 550 881,56\nDecoupled Direct Aids\n2014\nWeakness in LPIS (permanent pasture) CY 2013\nFLAT RATE\n1,78 %\nEUR\n– 242 483,04\n0,00\n– 242 483,04\nDecoupled Direct Aids\n2014\nWeakness in LPIS (permanent pasture) CY 2013\nFLAT RATE\n2,43 %\nEUR\n– 1 440 419,43\n0,00\n– 1 440 419,43\nDecoupled Direct Aids\n2014\nWeakness in LPIS (permanent pasture) CY 2013\nFLAT RATE\n3,58 %\nEUR\n– 13 675 357,81\n0,00\n– 13 675 357,81\nDecoupled Direct Aids\n2014\nWeakness in LPIS (permanent pasture) CY 2013\nFLAT RATE\n3,67 %\nEUR\n– 244 557,73\n0,00\n– 244 557,73\nDecoupled Direct Aids\n2014\nWeakness in LPIS (permanent pasture) CY 2013\nFLAT RATE\n5,22 %\nEUR\n– 22 266 789,93\n0,00\n– 22 266 789,93\nDecoupled Direct Aids\n2014\nWeakness in LPIS (permanent pasture) CY 2013\nFLAT RATE\n5,62 %\nEUR\n– 1 460 452,24\n0,00\n– 1 460 452,24\nDecoupled Direct Aids\n2014\nWeakness in LPIS (permanent pasture) CY 2013\nFLAT RATE\n8,21 %\nEUR\n– 1 461 393,24\n0,00\n– 1 461 393,24\nDecoupled Direct Aids\n2014\nWeakness in LPIS (permanent pasture) CY 2013\nFLAT RATE\n8,22 %\nEUR\n– 967 202,28\n0,00\n– 967 202,28\nDecoupled Direct Aids\n2014\nWeakness in LPIS (permanent pasture) CY 2013\nFLAT RATE\n8,53 %\nEUR\n– 1 203 367,96\n0,00\n– 1 203 367,96\nDecoupled Direct Aids\n2014\nWeakness in LPIS (permanent pasture) CY 2013\nFLAT RATE\n10,09 %\nEUR\n– 18 791 305,94\n0,00\n– 18 791 305,94\nFruit and Vegetables — Operational Programmes\n2010\nWeakness in POs Recognition — Control of the marketed production — Full delivery\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 149 704,7\n– 18 084,33\n– 131 620,37\nFruit and Vegetables — Operational Programmes\n2011\nWeakness in POs Recognition — Control of the marketed production — Full delivery\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 3 967,05\n– 479,22\n– 3 487,83\nTotal ES:\nEUR\n– 275 525 856,12\n– 73 307,6\n– 275 452 548,52\nMember State\nMeasure\nFY\nReason\nType\nCorrection %\nCurrency\nAmount\nDeductions\nFinancial Impact\nFR\nEntitlements\n2013\nAllocation for farmers who were not able to sign a private contract clause for objective reasons and allocation for new farmers\nFLAT RATE\n10,00 %\nEUR\n– 822 428,05\n0,00\n– 822 428,05\nEntitlements\n2014\nAllocation for farmers who were not able to sign a private contract clause for objective reasons and allocation for new farmers\nFLAT RATE\n10,00 %\nEUR\n– 1 382 331,15\n0,00\n– 1 382 331,15\nEntitlements\n2013\nAllocation for grubbing up vineyards 2012\nFLAT RATE\n10,00 %\nEUR\n– 16 184,7\n0,00\n– 16 184,7\nEntitlements\n2014\nAllocation for grubbing up vineyards 2012\nFLAT RATE\n10,00 %\nEUR\n– 16 184,7\n0,00\n– 16 184,7\nEntitlements\n2013\nAllocation for meat veals\nONE-OFF\nEUR\n– 1 363 665,37\n– 29 946,09\n– 1 333 719,28\nEntitlements\n2014\nAllocation for meat veals\nONE-OFF\nEUR\n– 1 363 665,37\n0,00\n– 1 363 665,37\nEntitlements\n2013\nIncorrect calculation of the linear reduction\nONE-OFF\nEUR\n– 89 489 899,24\n– 1 965 198,18\n– 87 524 701,06\nEntitlements\n2014\nIncorrect calculation of the linear reduction\nONE-OFF\nEUR\n– 98 131 085,38\n0,00\n– 98 131 085,38\nTotal FR:\nEUR\n– 192 585 443,96\n– 1 995 144,27\n– 190 590 299,69\nMember State\nMeasure\nFY\nReason\nType\nCorrection %\nCurrency\nAmount\nDeductions\nFinancial Impact\nGB\nCross Compliance\n2013\nApplication of tolerances for SMR7 and SMR8, CY 2012\nONE-OFF\nEUR\n– 216 342,93\n0,00\n– 216 342,93\nCross Compliance\n2014\nApplication of tolerances for SMR7 and SMR8, CY 2013\nONE-OFF\nEUR\n– 133 445,51\n0,00\n– 133 445,51\nCross Compliance\n2015\nApplication of tolerances for SMR7 and SMR8, CY 2014\nONE-OFF\nEUR\n– 125 894,15\n0,00\n– 125 894,15\nCertification\n2010\nClaw-back and completeness of Annex III\nONE-OFF\nEUR\n– 373 689,17\n0,00\n– 373 689,17\nCertification\n2011\nClaw-back and completeness of Annex III\nONE-OFF\nEUR\n– 388,00\n0,00\n– 388,00\nCertification\n2012\nClaw-back and completeness of Annex III\nONE-OFF\nEUR\n– 3 394,82\n0,00\n– 3 394,82\nCross Compliance\n2011\nDeficient control of 3 GAEC and MRFPP, Minimum control rate for SMR8 not achieved, insufficient sample size for SMR7, CY2010\nFLAT RATE\n2,00 %\nEUR\n– 1 456 734,56\n– 16 924,48\n– 1 439 810,08\nCross Compliance\n2012\nDeficient control of 3 GAEC and MRFPP, Minimum control rate for SMR8 not achieved, insufficient sample size for SMR7, CY2010\nFLAT RATE\n2,00 %\nEUR\n– 9 246,99\n8,89\n– 9 255,88\nCross Compliance\n2013\nDeficient control of 3 GAEC and MRFPP, Minimum control rate for SMR8 not achieved, insufficient sample size for SMR7, CY2010\nFLAT RATE\n2,00 %\nEUR\n– 6 356,12\n0,00\n– 6 356,12\nCross Compliance\n2012\nDeficient control of 3 GAEC and MRFPP, Minimum control rate for SMR8 not achieved, insufficient sample size for SMR7, CY2011\nFLAT RATE\n2,00 %\nEUR\n– 4 128 736,01\n– 82 450,81\n– 4 046 285,2\nCross Compliance\n2013\nDeficient control of 3 GAEC and MRFPP, Minimum control rate for SMR8 not achieved, insufficient sample size for SMR7, CY2011\nFLAT RATE\n2,00 %\nEUR\n– 6 293,36\n0,00\n– 6 293,36\nCross Compliance\n2014\nDeficient control of 3 GAEC and MRFPP, Minimum control rate for SMR8 not achieved, insufficient sample size for SMR7, CY2011\nFLAT RATE\n2,00 %\nEUR\n– 1 188,27\n0,00\n– 1 188,27\nCross Compliance\n2013\nDeficient control of 3 GAEC and MRFPP, Minimum control rate for SMR8 not achieved, insufficient sample size for SMR7, CY2012\nFLAT RATE\n2,00 %\nEUR\n– 4 133 131,91\n– 82 712,75\n– 4 050 419,16\nCross Compliance\n2014\nDeficient control of 3 GAEC and MRFPP, Minimum control rate for SMR8 not achieved, insufficient sample size for SMR7, CY2012\nFLAT RATE\n2,00 %\nEUR\n– 3 715,44\n– 75,10\n– 3 640,34\nCross Compliance\n2011\nTolerance applied for identification for SMR7 and SMR8, CY2010\nONE-OFF\nEUR\n– 358 022,71\n– 7 160,45\n– 350 862,26\nCross Compliance\n2012\nTolerance applied for identification for SMR7 and SMR8, CY2011\nONE-OFF\nEUR\n– 570 898,01\n– 12 536,93\n– 558 361,08\nCross Compliance\n2013\nTolerance applied for identification for SMR7 and SMR8, CY2012\nONE-OFF\nEUR\n– 306 764,01\n– 613,53\n– 306 150,48\nTotal GB:\nEUR\n– 11 834 241,97\n– 202 465,16\n– 11 631 776,81\nMember State\nMeasure\nFY\nReason\nType\nCorrection %\nCurrency\nAmount\nDeductions\nFinancial Impact\nIT\nCross Compliance\n2011\nSeveral SMRs partially checked, leniency of the sanctioning system, farmers with animals, CY2010\nESTIMATED AMOUNT\nEUR\n– 1 541 264,44\n– 451,39\n– 1 540 813,05\nCross Compliance\n2012\nSeveral SMRs partially checked, leniency of the sanctioning system, farmers with animals, CY2011\nESTIMATED AMOUNT\nEUR\n– 1 509 688,44\n0,00\n– 1 509 688,44\nCross Compliance\n2013\nSeveral SMRs partially checked, leniency of the sanctioning system, farmers with animals, CY2012\nESTIMATED AMOUNT\nEUR\n– 1 482 417,28\n0,00\n– 1 482 417,28\nCross Compliance\n2011\nTwo SMRs partially checked, farmers without animals, CY2010\nESTIMATED AMOUNT\nEUR\n– 450 758,57\n0,00\n– 450 758,57\nCross Compliance\n2012\nTwo SMRs partially checked, farmers without animals, CY2011\nESTIMATED AMOUNT\nEUR\n– 473 989,06\n0,00\n– 473 989,06\nCross Compliance\n2013\nTwo SMRs partially checked, farmers without animals, CY2012\nESTIMATED AMOUNT\nEUR\n– 497 207,98\n0,00\n– 497 207,98\nTotal IT:\nEUR\n– 5 955 325,77\n– 451,39\n– 5 954 874,38\nMember State\nMeasure\nFY\nReason\nType\nCorrection %\nCurrency\nAmount\nDeductions\nFinancial Impact\nLU\nDecoupled Direct Aids\n2013\nClaim year 2012: weaknesses in effectiveness of risk analysis.\nONE-OFF\nEUR\n– 77 965,03\n– 155,93\n– 77 809,1\nDecoupled Direct Aids\n2014\nClaim year 2013: weaknesses in effectiveness of risk analysis.\nONE-OFF\nEUR\n– 19 066,61\n0,00\n– 19 066,61\nDecoupled Direct Aids\n2015\nClaim year 2014: weaknesses in effectiveness of risk analysis.\nONE-OFF\nEUR\n– 10 880,09\n0,00\n– 10 880,09\nDecoupled Direct Aids\n2014\nClaim years from 2012 to 2013: non-retroactivity of reductions and sanctions as per Art. 57 and 80 of Regulation (EC) No 1122/2009.\nONE-OFF\nEUR\n– 28 439,04\n0,00\n– 28 439,04\nDecoupled Direct Aids\n2014\nClaim years from 2012 to 2014: eligibility of linear landscape elements as per Art. 26 of Regulation (EC) No 1122/2009\nONE-OFF\nEUR\n– 7 926,48\n– 6,00\n– 7 920,48\nTotal LU:\nEUR\n– 144 277,25\n– 161,93\n– 144 115,32\nMember State\nMeasure\nFY\nReason\nType\nCorrection %\nCurrency\nAmount\nDeductions\nFinancial Impact\nLV\nFood Aid within the Community\n2013\nAdvance payment to operator exceeds regulatory maximum\nONE-OFF\nEUR\n– 44 082,5\n0,00\n– 44 082,5\nOther Direct Aid — Article 68-72 of Reg.73/2009\n2013\nIncorrect calculation of aid payments\nONE-OFF\nEUR\n– 34 355,75\n0,00\n– 34 355,75\nOther Direct Aid — Article 68-72 of Reg.73/2009\n2014\nIncorrect calculation of aid payments\nONE-OFF\nEUR\n– 33 114,31\n0,00\n– 33 114,31\nOther Direct Aid — Article 68-72 of Reg.73/2009\n2013\nNo mention of the measure in the control report — insufficient awareness of inspectors about specific risks\nONE-OFF\nEUR\n– 2 356,35\n0,00\n– 2 356,35\nOther Direct Aid — Article 68-72 of Reg.73/2009\n2014\nNo mention of the measure in the control report — insufficient awareness of inspectors about specific risks\nONE-OFF\nEUR\n– 2 271,21\n0,00\n– 2 271,21\nFood Aid within the Community\n2013\nNon-compliance with applicable time limits for public procurement\nFLAT RATE\n2,00 %\nEUR\n– 98 781,18\n– 881,65\n– 97 899,53\nTotal LV:\nEUR\n– 214 961,3\n– 881,65\n– 214 079,65\nMember State\nMeasure\nFY\nReason\nType\nCorrection %\nCurrency\nAmount\nDeductions\nFinancial Impact\nNL\nCross Compliance\n2015\nWeaknesses in on-the-spot check for SMR12, CY2014\nONE-OFF\nEUR\n– 17 819,22\n0,00\n– 17 819,22\nCross Compliance\n2013\nWeaknesses in on-the-spot checks for SMR8 and SMR12, CY2012\nONE-OFF\nEUR\n– 37 075,36\n0,00\n– 37 075,36\nCross Compliance\n2014\nWeaknesses in on-the-spot checks for SMR8 and SMR12, CY2013\nONE-OFF\nEUR\n– 5 779,47\n0,00\n– 5 779,47\nTotal NL:\nEUR\n– 60 674,05\n0,00\n– 60 674,05\nMember State\nMeasure\nFY\nReason\nType\nCorrection %\nCurrency\nAmount\nDeductions\nFinancial Impact\nPT\nCross Compliance\n2013\nOne GAEC inadequately defined, one GAEC not controlled, partial deficiencies in 4 SMRS, leniency in the sanctioning system, CY2012\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 3 233 085,77\n– 108 110,02\n– 3 124 975,75\nCross Compliance\n2011\nOne GAEC inadequately defined, partial deficiencies in 4 SMRS, leniency in the sanctioning system, CY2010\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 899 122,29\n– 208 499,79\n– 690 622,5\nCross Compliance\n2012\nOne GAEC inadequately defined, partial deficiencies in 4 SMRS, leniency in the sanctioning system, CY2010\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 7 817,09\n– 842,64\n– 6 974,45\nCross Compliance\n2013\nOne GAEC inadequately defined, partial deficiencies in 4 SMRS, leniency in the sanctioning system, CY2010\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n180,91\n0,00\n180,91\nCross Compliance\n2012\nOne GAEC inadequately defined, partial deficiencies in 4 SMRS, leniency in the sanctioning system, CY2011\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 3 217 040,09\n– 245 336,98\n– 2 971 703,11\nCross Compliance\n2013\nOne GAEC inadequately defined, partial deficiencies in 4 SMRS, leniency in the sanctioning system, CY2011\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 2 037,25\n0,00\n– 2 037,25\nCross Compliance\n2011\nOne GAEC inadequately defined, partial deficiencies in 4 SMRS, leniency in the sanctioning system, CY2012\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 166 454,16\n0,00\n– 166 454,16\nCross Compliance\n2012\nOne GAEC inadequately defined, partial deficiencies in 4 SMRS, leniency in the sanctioning system, CY2012\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 46 559,18\n0,00\n– 46 559,18\nDecoupled Direct Aids\n2013\nWeakness in consolidation, CY2012\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 21 462 543,9\n0,00\n– 21 462 543,9\nDecoupled Direct Aids\n2014\nWeakness in consolidation, CY2013\nFLAT RATE\n2,00 %\nEUR\n– 8 494 795,8\n0,00\n– 8 494 795,8\nTotal PT:\nEUR\n– 37 529 274,62\n– 562 789,43\n– 36 966 485,19\nMember State\nMeasure\nFY\nReason\nType\nCorrection %\nCurrency\nAmount\nDeductions\nFinancial Impact\nSE\nMilk — School milk\n2010\nIncomplete administrative checking of aid applications\nESTIMATED AMOUNT\nEUR\n– 78 643,3\n0,00\n– 78 643,3\nMilk — School milk\n2011\nIncomplete administrative checking of aid applications\nESTIMATED AMOUNT\nEUR\n– 84 843,0\n0,00\n– 84 843,0\nMilk — School milk\n2012\nIncomplete administrative checking of aid applications\nESTIMATED AMOUNT\nEUR\n– 90 599,19\n0,00\n– 90 599,19\nMilk — School milk\n2013\nIncomplete administrative checking of aid applications\nESTIMATED AMOUNT\nEUR\n– 71 717,3\n0,00\n– 71 717,3\nMilk — School milk\n2014\nIncomplete administrative checking of aid applications\nESTIMATED AMOUNT\nEUR\n– 53 174,59\n0,00\n– 53 174,59\nTotal SE:\nEUR\n– 378 977,38\n0,00\n– 378 977,38\nCurrency\nAmount\nDeductions\nFinancial Impact\nEUR\n– 556 838 664,46\n– 2 839 459,06\n– 553 999 205,4",
  "extent": "E+W+S+N.I.",
  "status": null,
  "version": "current",
  "annotations": [],
  "outstanding_effects": [],
  "provenance": {
    "source": "legislation.gov.uk",
    "source_url": "https://www.legislation.gov.uk/eudn/2016/1059/annex/division/4",
    "retrieved_at": "2026-11-01T15:13:55.644562+00:00"
  },
  "licence": "Open Government Licence v3.0",
  "licence_url": "https://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/version/3/",
  "attribution": "Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Source: legislation.gov.uk, The National Archives."
}