{
  "url": "https://openlegislation.uk/eu-decision-2016-1059/annex/division-5",
  "json_url": "https://openlegislation.uk/eu-decision-2016-1059/annex/division-5.json",
  "legislation": "eudn/2016/1059",
  "legislation_title": "Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2016/1059 of 20 June 2016 excluding from European Union financing certain expenditure incurred by the Member States under the European Agricultural Guarantee Fund (EAGF) and under the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) (notified under document C(2016) 3753) (only the Bulgarian, Czech, Danish, Dutch, English, French, German, Italian, Latvian, Lithuanian, Portuguese, Slovenian, Spanish, Swedish texts are authentic)",
  "legislation_url": "https://openlegislation.uk/eu-decision-2016-1059",
  "path": "annex/division/5",
  "kind": "division",
  "number": null,
  "heading": "Budget Item: 6711",
  "text": "Member State\nMeasure\nFY\nReason\nType\nCorrection %\nCurrency\nAmount\nDeductions\nFinancial Impact\nDE\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 1 + 3 — Investment-orientated measures (2007-2013)\n2013\n10 % project costs offered to be paid by the winning bidder — correction of 25 % on the individual projects\nONE-OFF\nEUR\n– 98 865,51\n0,00\n– 98 865,51\nRural Development EAFRD Investment — public beneficiaries\n2014\n10 % project costs offered to be paid by the winning bidder — correction of 25 % on the individual projects\nONE-OFF\nEUR\n– 36 996,07\n0,00\n– 36 996,07\nRural Development EAFRD Investment — public beneficiaries\n2014\n10 % project costs paid by the winning bidder — 100 % correction on the individual projects\nONE-OFF\nEUR\n– 461 580,98\n0,00\n– 461 580,98\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area-related measures)\n2013\nAgri-Environment — Lack of verification of livestock density during the on-the-spot check\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 127 073,79\n0,00\n– 127 073,79\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area-related measures)\n2014\nAgri-Environment — Lack of verification of livestock density during the on-the-spot check\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 126 252,39\n0,00\n– 126 252,39\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area-related measures)\n2015\nAgri-Environment — Lack of verification of livestock density during the on-the-spot check\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 110 666,82\n0,00\n– 110 666,82\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 1 + 3 — investment-orientated measures (2007-2013)\n2012\nWeaknesses in tendering, awarding bids, exceeding thresholds, administrative control and taking over own contribution\nFLAT RATE\n10,00 %\nEUR\n– 375 618,2\n0,00\n– 375 618,2\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 1 + 3 — investment-orientated measures (2007-2013)\n2013\nWeaknesses in tendering, awarding bids, exceeding thresholds, administrative control and taking over own contribution\nFLAT RATE\n10,00 %\nEUR\n– 164 490,5\n0,00\n– 164 490,5\nRural Development EAFRD Investment — public beneficiaries\n2014\nWeaknesses in tendering, most advantageous offer, exceeding thresholds (State aid and national financing), covering of projects costs by the winning bidder, related weaknesses in administrative control\nFLAT RATE\n10,00 %\nEUR\n– 70 931,6\n0,00\n– 70 931,6\nRural Development EAFRD Investment — public beneficiaries\n2015\nWeaknesses in tendering, most advantageous offer, exceeding thresholds (state aid and national financing), covering of projects costs by the winning bidder, related weaknesses in administrative control\nFLAT RATE\n10,00 %\nEUR\n12,49\n0,00\n12,49\nTotal DE:\nEUR\n– 1 572 463,37\n0,00\n– 1 572 463,37\nMember State\nMeasure\nFY\nReason\nType\nCorrection %\nCurrency\nAmount\nDeductions\nFinancial Impact\nDK\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 1 + 3 — investment-orientated measures (2007-2013)\n2008\nWeaknesses in key controls: check of the reasonableness of the costs, scope of the ex post checks\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 19 234,2\n0,00\n– 19 234,2\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 1 + 3 — investment-orientated measures (2007-2013)\n2009\nWeaknesses in key controls: check of the reasonableness of the costs, scope of the ex post checks\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 10 410,87\n0,00\n– 10 410,87\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 1 + 3 — investment-orientated measures (2007-2013)\n2010\nWeaknesses in key controls: check of the reasonableness of the costs, scope of the ex post checks\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 10 520,43\n0,00\n– 10 520,43\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 1 + 3 — investment-orientated measures (2007-2013)\n2011\nWeaknesses in key controls: check of the reasonableness of the costs, scope of the ex post checks\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 21 757,75\n0,00\n– 21 757,75\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 1 + 3 — investment-orientated measures (2007-2013)\n2012\nWeaknesses in key controls: check of the reasonableness of the costs, scope of the ex post checks\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 93 474,3\n0,00\n– 93 474,3\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 1 + 3 — investment-orientated measures (2007-2013)\n2013\nWeaknesses in key controls: check of the reasonableness of the costs, scope of the ex post checks\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 671 102,85\n0,00\n– 671 102,85\nRural Development EAFRD Investment — private beneficiaries\n2014\nWeaknesses in key controls: check of the reasonableness of the cost, scope of the ex post checks\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 1 187 926,23\n0,00\n– 1 187 926,23\nTotal DK:\nEUR\n– 2 014 426,63\n0,00\n– 2 014 426,63\nMember State\nMeasure\nFY\nReason\nType\nCorrection %\nCurrency\nAmount\nDeductions\nFinancial Impact\nES\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 4 Leader (2007-2013)\n2013\nLack of verification of the reasonableness of costs\nONE-OFF\nEUR\n– 40 312,61\n0,00\n– 40 312,61\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 4 Leader (2007-2013)\n2013\nAbsence in an ancillary control — lack of records of serial numbers\nFLAT RATE\n2,00 %\nEUR\n– 238 846,71\n0,00\n– 238 846,71\nCross Compliance\n2011\nInadequate instruction for controls, deficiencies in the scope of the controls, 2009\nFLAT RATE\n10,00 %\nEUR\n– 30 820,17\n– 238,69\n– 30 581,48\nCross Compliance\n2013\nInadequate instruction for controls, deficiencies in the scope of the controls, 2010\nFLAT RATE\n10,00 %\nEUR\n– 29 052,62\n0,00\n– 29 052,62\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, non-area-related measures)\n2012\nLack of audit trail in processing the applications and verification of the eligibility criteria — measures 226 and 227 actions directly implemented by the regions\nFLAT RATE\n2,00 %\nEUR\n– 630 767,9\n0,00\n– 630 767,9\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, non-area-related measures)\n2013\nLack of audit trail in processing the applications and verification of the eligibility criteria — measures 226 and 227 actions directly implemented by the regions\nFLAT RATE\n2,00 %\nEUR\n– 1 092 936,85\n0,00\n– 1 092 936,85\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area-related measures)\n2010\nLack of recovery, RD, CY2009\nONE-OFF\nEUR\n– 106 540,72\n0,00\n– 106 540,72\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area-related measures)\n2011\nLack of recovery, RD, CY2010\nONE-OFF\nEUR\n– 507 976,98\n0,00\n– 507 976,98\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area-related measures)\n2012\nLack of recovery, RD, CY2011\nONE-OFF\nEUR\n– 726 960,97\n0,00\n– 726 960,97\nCertification\n2014\nMLE in EAFRD non-IACS\nONE-OFF\nEUR\n– 76 305,79\n0,00\n– 76 305,79\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, non-area-related measures)\n2012\nNon respect of separation of duties laid down in Article 25(4) of Regulation (EU) No 65/2011 — measures 226 and 227 grants (only some files are concerned)\nFLAT RATE\n2,00 %\nEUR\n– 21 756,65\n0,00\n– 21 756,65\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, non-area-related measures)\n2013\nNon respect of separation of duties laid down in Article 25(4) of Regulation (EU) No 65/2011 — measures 226 and 227 grants (only some files are concerned)\nFLAT RATE\n2,00 %\nEUR\n– 18 956,82\n0,00\n– 18 956,82\nCertification\n2014\nReimbursement to the Fund\nONE-OFF\nEUR\n13 600,0\n0,00\n13 600,0\nTotal ES:\nEUR\n– 3 507 634,79\n– 238,69\n– 3 507 396,1\nMember State\nMeasure\nFY\nReason\nType\nCorrection %\nCurrency\nAmount\nDeductions\nFinancial Impact\nGB\nCross Compliance\n2011\nDeficient control of 3 GAEC and MRFPP, Minimum control rate for SMR8 not achieved, insufficient sample size for SMR7, CY2010\nFLAT RATE\n2,00 %\nEUR\n– 204 524,82\n– 6 200,68\n– 198 324,14\nCross Compliance\n2012\nDeficient control of 3 GAEC and MRFPP, Minimum control rate for SMR8 not achieved, insufficient sample size for SMR7, CY2010\nFLAT RATE\n2,00 %\nEUR\n13 346,23\n– 1 357,03\n14 703,26\nCross Compliance\n2013\nDeficient control of 3 GAEC and MRFPP, Minimum control rate for SMR8 not achieved, insufficient sample size for SMR7, CY2010\nFLAT RATE\n2,00 %\nEUR\n5 741,82\n– 305,80\n6 047,62\nCross Compliance\n2011\nDeficient control of 3 GAEC and MRFPP, Minimum control rate for SMR8 not achieved, insufficient sample size for SMR7, CY2011\nFLAT RATE\n2,00 %\nEUR\n– 350 753,25\n0,00\n– 350 753,25\nCross Compliance\n2012\nDeficient control of 3 GAEC and MRFPP, Minimum control rate for SMR8 not achieved, insufficient sample size for SMR7, CY2011\nFLAT RATE\n2,00 %\nEUR\n– 317 738,94\n0,00\n– 317 738,94\nCross Compliance\n2013\nDeficient control of 3 GAEC and MRFPP, Minimum control rate for SMR8 not achieved, insufficient sample size for SMR7, CY2011\nFLAT RATE\n2,00 %\nEUR\n9 145,37\n– 15,58\n9 160,95\nCross Compliance\n2014\nDeficient control of 3 GAEC and MRFPP, Minimum control rate for SMR8 not achieved, insufficient sample size for SMR7, CY2011\nFLAT RATE\n2,00 %\nEUR\n10 371,16\n– 966,81\n11 337,97\nCross Compliance\n2012\nDeficient control of 3 GAEC and MRFPP, Minimum control rate for SMR8 not achieved, insufficient sample size for SMR7, CY2012\nFLAT RATE\n2,00 %\nEUR\n– 361 073,8\n0,00\n– 361 073,8\nCross Compliance\n2013\nDeficient control of 3 GAEC and MRFPP, Minimum control rate for SMR8 not achieved, insufficient sample size for SMR7, CY2012\nFLAT RATE\n2,00 %\nEUR\n– 371 204,15\n0,00\n– 371 204,15\nCross Compliance\n2014\nDeficient control of 3 GAEC and MRFPP, Minimum control rate for SMR8 not achieved, insufficient sample size for SMR7, CY2012\nFLAT RATE\n2,00 %\nEUR\n1 642,49\n0,00\n1 642,49\nTotal GB:\nEUR\n– 1 565 047,89\n– 8 845,9\n– 1 556 201,99\nMember State\nMeasure\nFY\nReason\nType\nCorrection %\nCurrency\nAmount\nDeductions\nFinancial Impact\nIT\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area-related measures)\n2014\nLack of traceability of administrative checks carried out (in situ visits) for Measure 214 (part genetic resources only).\nFLAT RATE\n2,00 %\nEUR\n– 20 143,37\n0,00\n– 20 143,37\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, non-area-related measures)\n2013\nLack of traceability of administrative checks carried out (in situ visits) for measures 216, 226 and 227.\nFLAT RATE\n2,00 %\nEUR\n– 287 733,55\n0,00\n– 287 733,55\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, non-area-related measures)\n2014\nLack of traceability of administrative checks carried out (in situ visits) for measures 216, 226 and 227.\nFLAT RATE\n2,00 %\nEUR\n– 351 204,5\n0,00\n– 351 204,5\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 1 — Measures with flat rate support (2007-2013)\n2012\nMeasure 112: non-compliance with the 18-month rule (Article 13(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1974/2006)\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 29 568,7\n0,00\n– 29 568,7\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 1 — Measures with flat rate support (2007-2013)\n2013\nMeasure 112: non-compliance with the 18-month rule (Article 13(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1974/2006)\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 473 821,0\n0,00\n– 473 821,0\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 1 — Measures with flat rate support\n2014\nMeasure 112: non-compliance with the 18-month rule (Article 13(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1974/2006)\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 9 059,4\n0,00\n– 9 059,4\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 1 — Measures with flat rate support\n2015\nMeasure 112: non-compliance with the 18-month rule (Article 13(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1974/2006)\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 3 425,5\n0,00\n– 3 425,5\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, non-area-related measures)\n2013\nNon-eligible expenditure detected during the audit\nONE-OFF\nEUR\n– 20 228,0\n0,00\n– 20 228,0\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area-related measures)\n2014\nNon-eligible expenditure detected during the audit\nONE-OFF\nEUR\n– 2 427,98\n0,00\n– 2 427,98\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, non-area-related measures)\n2014\nNon-eligible expenditure detected during the audit\nONE-OFF\nEUR\n– 28 173,3\n0,00\n– 28 173,3\nCross Compliance\n2011\nSeveral SMRs partially checked, leniency of the sanctioning system, farmers with animals, CY2010\nESTIMATED AMOUNT\nEUR\n– 60 953,16\n3,67\n– 60 956,83\nCross Compliance\n2012\nSeveral SMRs partially checked, leniency of the sanctioning system, farmers with animals, CY2011\nESTIMATED AMOUNT\nEUR\n– 82 528,15\n– 2 949,3\n– 79 578,85\nCross Compliance\n2013\nSeveral SMRs partially checked, leniency of the sanctioning system, farmers with animals, CY2012\nESTIMATED AMOUNT\nEUR\n– 89 122,06\n– 2 306,35\n– 86 815,71\nCross Compliance\n2011\nTwo SMRs partially checked, farmers without animals, CY2010\nESTIMATED AMOUNT\nEUR\n– 17 826,41\n0,00\n– 17 826,41\nCross Compliance\n2012\nTwo SMRs partially checked, farmers without animals, CY2011\nESTIMATED AMOUNT\nEUR\n– 25 910,93\n0,00\n– 25 910,93\nCross Compliance\n2013\nTwo SMRs partially checked, farmers without animals, CY2012\nESTIMATED AMOUNT\nEUR\n– 29 891,85\n0,00\n– 29 891,85\nTotal IT:\nEUR\n– 1 532 017,86\n– 5 251,98\n– 1 526 765,88\nMember State\nMeasure\nFY\nReason\nType\nCorrection %\nCurrency\nAmount\nDeductions\nFinancial Impact\nLT\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area-related measures)\n2012\nControl of the eligibility criteria for NH (follow-up of Enquiry RD2/2009/010)\nFLAT RATE\n2,00 %\nEUR\n– 233 271,48\n0,00\n– 233 271,48\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area-related measures)\n2013\nControl of the eligibility criteria for NH (follow-up of Enquiry RD2/2009/010)\nFLAT RATE\n2,00 %\nEUR\n– 198 148,95\n0,00\n– 198 148,95\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area-related measures)\n2014\nControl of the eligibility criteria for NH (follow-up of Enquiry RD2/2009/010)\nFLAT RATE\n2,00 %\nEUR\n– 304 459,02\n0,00\n– 304 459,02\nTotal LT:\nEUR\n– 735 879,45\n0,00\n– 735 879,45\nMember State\nMeasure\nFY\nReason\nType\nCorrection %\nCurrency\nAmount\nDeductions\nFinancial Impact\nPT\nCross Compliance\n2011\nOne GAEC inadequately defined, partial deficiencies in 4 SMRS, leniency in the sanctioning system, CY2010\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 231 656,69\n– 87,24\n– 231 569,45\nCross Compliance\n2012\nOne GAEC inadequately defined, partial deficiencies in 4 SMRS, leniency in the sanctioning system, CY2010\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 10 909,92\n0,00\n– 10 909,92\nCross Compliance\n2013\nOne GAEC inadequately defined, partial deficiencies in 4 SMRS, leniency in the sanctioning system, CY2010\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 1 883,9\n0,00\n– 1 883,9\nCross Compliance\n2011\nOne GAEC inadequately defined, partial deficiencies in 4 SMRS, leniency in the sanctioning system, CY2011\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 382 418,8\n– 19 445,93\n– 362 972,87\nCross Compliance\n2012\nOne GAEC inadequately defined, partial deficiencies in 4 SMRS, leniency in the sanctioning system, CY2011\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 449 842,53\n– 616,54\n– 449 225,99\nCross Compliance\n2013\nOne GAEC inadequately defined, partial deficiencies in 4 SMRS, leniency in the sanctioning system, CY2011\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 17 947,73\n0,00\n– 17 947,73\nCross Compliance\n2012\nOne GAEC inadequately defined, partial deficiencies in 4 SMRS, leniency in the sanctioning system, CY2012\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 581 182,86\n0,00\n– 581 182,86\nCross Compliance\n2013\nOne GAEC inadequately defined, partial deficiencies in 4 SMRS, leniency in the sanctioning system, CY2012\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 320 053,39\n0,00\n– 320 053,39\nTotal PT:\nEUR\n– 1 995 895,82\n– 20 149,71\n– 1 975 746,11\nMember State\nMeasure\nFY\nReason\nType\nCorrection %\nCurrency\nAmount\nDeductions\nFinancial Impact\nSE\nCertification\n2013\nError detected in the EAFRD non-IACS population\nONE-OFF\nEUR\n– 58 780,85\n0,00\n– 58 780,85\nCertification\n2014\nError detected in the EAFRD non-IACS population\nONE-OFF\nEUR\n– 29 887,03\n0,00\n– 29 887,03\nCertification\n2014\nErrors detected in the EAFRD non-IACS population\nONE-OFF\nEUR\n– 474 359,5\n0,00\n– 474 359,5\nTotal SE:\nEUR\n– 563 027,38\n0,00\n– 563 027,38\nCurrency\nAmount\nDeductions\nFinancial Impact\nEUR\n– 13 486 393,19\n– 34 486,28\n– 13 451 906,91",
  "extent": "E+W+S+N.I.",
  "status": null,
  "version": "current",
  "annotations": [],
  "outstanding_effects": [],
  "provenance": {
    "source": "legislation.gov.uk",
    "source_url": "https://www.legislation.gov.uk/eudn/2016/1059/annex/division/5",
    "retrieved_at": "2026-11-01T15:13:55.644562+00:00"
  },
  "licence": "Open Government Licence v3.0",
  "licence_url": "https://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/version/3/",
  "attribution": "Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Source: legislation.gov.uk, The National Archives."
}