{
  "url": "https://openlegislation.uk/eu-decision-2016-2018/annex/division-3",
  "json_url": "https://openlegislation.uk/eu-decision-2016-2018/annex/division-3.json",
  "legislation": "eudn/2016/2018",
  "legislation_title": "Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2016/2018 of 15 November 2016 excluding from European Union financing certain expenditure incurred by the Member States under the European Agricultural Guarantee Fund (EAGF) and under the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) (notified under document C(2016) 7232) (Only the Bulgarian, Danish, Dutch, English, Finnish, French, German, Greek, Hungarian, Italian, Maltese, Latvian, Polish, Portuguese, Romanian, Slovak, Slovenian, Spanish, Swedish texts are authentic)",
  "legislation_url": "https://openlegislation.uk/eu-decision-2016-2018",
  "path": "annex/division/3",
  "kind": "division",
  "number": null,
  "heading": "Budget Item: 6701",
  "text": "Member State\nMeasure\nFY\nReason\nType\nCorrection %\nCurrency\nAmount\nDeductions\nFinancial Impact\nAT\nFruit and Vegetables — Operational Programmes\n2012\nAssets located outside the POs premises or holdings\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 1 909 582,5\n0,00\n– 1 909 582,5\nFruit and Vegetables — Operational Programmes\n2013\nAssets located outside the POs premises or holdings\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 1 864 938,19\n0,00\n– 1 864 938,19\nFruit and Vegetables — Operational Programmes\n2012\nIneligible staff costs\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 39 738,41\n0,00\n– 39 738,41\nFruit and Vegetables — Operational Programmes\n2013\nIneligible staff costs\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 41 174,87\n0,00\n– 41 174,87\nIrregularities\n2012\nNon-accrued/reported interest and delays in the recovery procedure\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 24 231,03\n0,00\n– 24 231,03\nFruit and Vegetables — Operational Programmes\n2012\nUnduly recognised POs\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 498 721,65\n0,00\n– 498 721,65\nFruit and Vegetables — Operational Programmes\n2013\nUnduly recognised POs\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 899 392,44\n0,00\n– 899 392,44\nFruit and Vegetables — Operational programmes incl withdrawals\n2014\nUnduly recognised POs\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 915 136,7\n0,00\n– 915 136,7\nFruit and Vegetables — Operational Programmes\n2012\nWeaknesses in key control FY2012-3\nFLAT RATE\n10,00 %\nEUR\n– 559 871,49\n– 244 804,26\n– 315 067,23\nFruit and Vegetables — Operational Programmes\n2013\nWeaknesses in key control FY2012-3\nFLAT RATE\n10,00 %\nEUR\n– 776 598,77\n– 280 550,55\n– 496 048,22\nFruit and Vegetables — Operational programmes incl withdrawals\n2014\nWeakness in key controls FY 2014 only\nFLAT RATE\n10,00 %\nEUR\n– 882 206,97\n0,00\n– 882 206,97\nTotal AT:\nEUR\n– 8 411 593,02\n– 525 354,81\n– 7 886 238,21\nMember State\nMeasure\nFY\nReason\nType\nCorrection %\nCurrency\nAmount\nDeductions\nFinancial Impact\nBE\nCross Compliance\n2013\nApplication of tolerances and leniency of the sanctioning system — CY 2012\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 43 418,7\n– 86,84\n– 43 331,86\nCross Compliance\n2014\nApplication of tolerances and leniency of the sanctioning system — CY 2013\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 87 826,17\n– 175,65\n– 87 650,52\nCross Compliance\n2015\nApplication of tolerances and leniency of the sanctioning system — CY 2014\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 37 343,34\n– 74,68\n– 37 268,66\nCross Compliance\n2013\nLimited scope of checks of SMRs 1, 2, 4 and 5 — No follow-up of minor non-compliances — Deficient risk analysis for checks by veterinary services — CY 2012\nFLAT RATE\n2,00 %\nEUR\n– 598 444,65\n– 256,81\n– 598 187,84\nCross Compliance\n2014\nLimited scope of checks of SMRs 1, 2, 4 and 5 — No follow-up of minor non-compliances — Deficient risk analysis for checks by veterinary services — CY 2012\nFLAT RATE\n2,00 %\nEUR\n– 193,80\n0,00\n– 193,80\nCross Compliance\n2014\nLimited scope of checks of SMRs 1, 2, 4 and 5 — No follow-up of minor non-compliances — Deficient risk analysis for checks by veterinary services — CY 2013\nFLAT RATE\n2,00 %\nEUR\n– 582 487,99\n0,00\n– 582 487,99\nCross Compliance\n2015\nLimited scope of checks of SMRs 1, 2, 4 and 5 — No follow-up of minor non-compliances — Deficient risk analysis for checks by veterinary services — CY 2014\nFLAT RATE\n10,00 %\nEUR\n– 569 653,02\n0,00\n– 569 653,02\nTotal BE:\nEUR\n– 1 919 367,67\n– 593,98\n– 1 918 773,69\nMember State\nMeasure\nFY\nReason\nType\nCorrection %\nCurrency\nAmount\nDeductions\nFinancial Impact\nDE\nCertification\n2014\nFinancial errors identified by the Certification Body\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 6 121,69\n0,00\n– 6 121,69\nCertification\n2014\nFinancial errors identified by the Certification Body\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 2 397,36\n0,00\n– 2 397,36\nDecoupled Direct Aids\n2015\nWeakness in the LPIS-GIS — Performance of crosschecks to establish eligibility of the parcel declared (key control)\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 65 880,0\n0,00\n– 65 880,0\nDecoupled Direct Aids\n2016\nWeakness in the LPIS-GIS — Performance of crosschecks to establish eligibility of the parcel declared (key control)\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 72 630,0\n0,00\n– 72 630,0\nTotal DE:\nEUR\n– 147 029,05\n0,00\n– 147 029,05\nMember State\nMeasure\nFY\nReason\nType\nCorrection %\nCurrency\nAmount\nDeductions\nFinancial Impact\nDK\nCertification\n2015\nErrors detected in the re-performance of OTSC in the EAGF IACS population\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 3 163,98\n0,00\n– 3 163,98\nCertification\n2012\nLack of appropriate reaction by DAFA in relation to the company evading the controls\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 182 151,6\n0,00\n– 182 151,6\nTotal DK:\nEUR\n– 185 315,58\n0,00\n– 185 315,58\nMember State\nMeasure\nFY\nReason\nType\nCorrection %\nCurrency\nAmount\nDeductions\nFinancial Impact\nES\nRecoveries\n2008\nAmounts not traced back in the authorities' declaration of payments\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 57 499,79\n0,00\n– 57 499,79\nRecoveries\n2009\nAmounts not traced back in the authorities' declaration of payments\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 57 499,79\n0,00\n– 57 499,79\nRecoveries\n2010\nAmounts not traced back in the authorities' declaration of payments\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 452 132,84\n0,00\n– 452 132,84\nRecoveries\n2011\nAmounts not traced back in the authorities' declaration of payments\nONE OFF\nEUR\n8 118,38\n0,00\n8 118,38\nRecoveries\n2012\nAmounts not traced back in the authorities' declaration of payments\nONE OFF\nEUR\n0,01\n0,00\n0,01\nCross Compliance\n2012\nDeficiencies in the effectiveness of OTSC, partial coverage of 7 SMRs, incorrect treatment of late notification and of missing ear tags (SMR7 and 8), CY 2011\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 4 552 942,45\n– 821,75\n– 4 552 120,7\nCross Compliance\n2013\nDeficiencies in the effectiveness of OTSC, partial coverage of 7 SMRs, incorrect treatment of late notification and of missing ear tags (SMR7 and 8), CY 2011\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 1 537,3\n0,00\n– 1 537,3\nCross Compliance\n2011\nDeficiencies in the effectiveness of OTSC, partial coverage of 7 SMRs, incorrect treatment of late notification and of missing ear tags (SMR7 and 8), CY 2012\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 3 172,88\n– 0,06\n– 3 172,82\nCross Compliance\n2013\nDeficiencies in the effectiveness of OTSC, partial coverage of 7 SMRs, incorrect treatment of late notification and of missing ear tags (SMR7 and 8), CY 2012\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 4 507 539,72\n– 84 158,35\n– 4 423 381,37\nFruit and Vegetables — Operational Programmes\n2008\nEnvironmental Management of Packaging (EMP)\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 10 582,61\n– 10 396,61\n– 186,00\nFruit and Vegetables — Operational Programmes\n2009\nEnvironmental Management of Packaging (EMP)\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 850 590,17\n– 813 343,56\n– 37 246,61\nFruit and Vegetables — Operational Programmes\n2010\nEnvironmental Management of Packaging (EMP)\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 9 872,42\n– 8 618,07\n– 1 254,35\nFruit and Vegetables — Operational Programmes\n2011\nEnvironmental Management of Packaging (EMP)\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 2 382,39\n– 2 266,08\n– 116,31\nFruit and Vegetables — Operational Programmes\n2012\nEnvironmental Management of Packaging (EMP)\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 343,30\n0,00\n– 343,30\nCertification\n2014\nExtrapolated error for EAGF non-IACS population\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 830,81\n0,00\n– 830,81\nCross Compliance\n2014\nIncorrect treatment of late notification and of missing ear tags (SMR7 and 8), CY 2013\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 688 407,59\n– 30 146,05\n– 658 261,54\nCertification\n2014\nKnown error identified in the EAGF IACS population. SPS\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 353 214,35\n– 1 807,35\n– 351 407,0\nCertification\n2012\nNon-eligible sugar restructuring aid\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 1 361 413,12\n– 5 268,22\n– 1 356 144,9\nFruit and Vegetables — Operational programmes incl withdrawals\n2009\nUndue aid payments for leasing arrangements\nONE OFF\n0,00 %\nEUR\n– 13 336,0\n– 3 289,74\n– 10 046,26\nFruit and Vegetables — Operational Programmes\n2009\nWeaknesses in eligibility of expenditure\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 29 641,68\n– 1 870,43\n– 27 771,25\nFruit and Vegetables — Operational Programmes\n2011\nWeaknesses in eligibility of expenditure\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 92 471,27\n– 558,53\n– 91 912,74\n_Recoveries\n2008\nWeaknesses in managing irregularities\nONE OFF\n0,00 %\nEUR\n– 90 579,48\n0,00\n– 90 579,48\n_Recoveries\n2009\nWeaknesses in managing irregularities\nONE OFF\n0,00 %\nEUR\n– 91 063,44\n0,00\n– 91 063,44\n_Recoveries\n2010\nWeaknesses in managing irregularities\nONE OFF\n0,00 %\nEUR\n– 412 867,62\n0,00\n– 412 867,62\n_Recoveries\n2011\nWeaknesses in managing irregularities\nONE OFF\n0,00 %\nEUR\n– 59 631,0\n0,00\n– 59 631,0\n_Recoveries\n2012\nWeaknesses in managing irregularities\nONE OFF\n0,00 %\nEUR\n– 16 835,39\n0,00\n– 16 835,39\nFruit and Vegetables — Operational programmes incl withdrawals\n2009\nWeaknesses in the control system for the recognition of producer organisations\nONE OFF\n0,00 %\nEUR\n– 280 031,76\n– 1 691,39\n– 278 340,37\nFruit and Vegetables — Operational programmes incl withdrawals\n2009\nWeaknesses in programme approval/authorisation of expenditure and Weaknesses in establishing standard flat rates for environmental actions. OP 2008 & 2009\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 57 063,2\n– 29 708,57\n– 27 354,63\nFruit and Vegetables — Operational programmes incl withdrawals\n2010\nWeaknesses in programme approval/authorisation of expenditure and Weaknesses in establishing standard flat rates for environmental actions. OP 2008 & 2009\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 300 020,04\n– 273 601,71\n– 26 418,33\nFruit and Vegetables — Operational Programmes\n2011\nWeaknesses in programme approval/authorisation of expenditure and Weaknesses in establishing standard flat rates for environmental actions. OP 2010, 2011 & 2012\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 205 226,38\n– 205 226,38\n0,00\nFruit and Vegetables — Operational Programmes\n2012\nWeaknesses in programme approval/authorisation of expenditure and Weaknesses in establishing standard flat rates for environmental actions. OP 2010, 2011 & 2012\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 193 521,83\n0,00\n– 193 521,83\nFruit and Vegetables — Operational Programmes\n2013\nWeaknesses in programme approval/authorisation of expenditure and Weaknesses in establishing standard flat rates for environmental actions. OP 2010, 2011 & 2012\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 245 200,53\n0,00\n– 245 200,53\nFruit and Vegetables — Operational programmes incl withdrawals\n2014\nWeaknesses in programme approval/authorisation of expenditure and Weaknesses in establishing standard flat rates for environmental actions. OP 2013\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 323 602,75\n0,00\n– 323 602,75\nFruit and Vegetables — Operational programmes incl withdrawals\n2009\nWeaknesses in programme approval/authorisation of expenditure and weaknesses in establishing standard flat rates for environmental actions\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 652 299,2\n– 180 687,65\n– 471 611,55\nFruit and Vegetables — Operational programmes incl withdrawals\n2010\nWeaknesses in programme approval/authorisation of expenditure and weaknesses in establishing standard flat rates for environmental actions\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 718 821,45\n– 88 990,15\n– 629 831,3\nFruit and Vegetables — Operational programmes incl withdrawals\n2011\nWeaknesses in programme approval/authorisation of expenditure and weaknesses in establishing standard flat rates for environmental actions\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 771 482,9\n– 93 881,68\n– 677 601,22\nFruit and Vegetables — Operational programmes incl withdrawals\n2012\nWeaknesses in programme approval/authorisation of expenditure and weaknesses in establishing standard flat rates for environmental actions\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 14 516,85\n0,00\n– 14 516,85\nFruit and Vegetables — Operational programmes incl withdrawals\n2008\nWeaknesses in the management of the risk of double funding\nFLAT RATE\n2,00 %\nEUR\n– 668 667,53\n– 588 156,44\n– 80 511,09\nFruit and Vegetables — Operational programmes incl withdrawals\n2009\nWeaknesses in the management of the risk of double funding\nFLAT RATE\n2,00 %\nEUR\n– 680 158,12\n– 237 238,19\n– 442 919,93\nFruit and Vegetables — Operational programmes incl withdrawals\n2010\nWeaknesses in the management of the risk of double funding\nFLAT RATE\n2,00 %\nEUR\n– 736 610,85\n– 91 366,47\n– 645 244,38\nFruit and Vegetables — Operational programmes incl withdrawals\n2011\nWeaknesses in the management of the risk of double funding\nFLAT RATE\n2,00 %\nEUR\n– 718 697,92\n– 127 039,32\n– 591 658,6\nFruit and Vegetables — Operational programmes incl withdrawals\n2012\nWeaknesses in the management of the risk of double funding\nFLAT RATE\n2,00 %\nEUR\n– 706 338,24\n– 26 251,74\n– 680 086,5\nFruit and Vegetables — Operational programmes incl withdrawals\n2013\nWeaknesses in the management of the risk of double funding\nFLAT RATE\n2,00 %\nEUR\n– 599 782,11\n– 23 254,76\n– 576 527,35\nTotal ES:\nEUR\n– 21 580 310,68\n– 2 929 639,25\n– 18 650 671,43\nMember State\nMeasure\nFY\nReason\nType\nCorrection %\nCurrency\nAmount\nDeductions\nFinancial Impact\nFR\nIrregularities\n2010\nCase n°DAJ2/DPO8492\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 26 750 942,0\n0,00\n– 26 750 942,0\nIrregularities\n2010\nCase n°GXHP200700062\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 2 920,03\n0,00\n– 2 920,03\nIrregularities\n2010\nCase n° LAIT 02836/TR410759\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 144 027,14\n0,00\n– 144 027,14\nIrregularities\n2010\nCase n°OINP201180010\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 38 302,46\n0,00\n– 38 302,46\nIrregularities\n2010\nCase n°TR2001008\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 50 253,13\n0,00\n– 50 253,13\nIrregularities\n2010\nCase n°TR451024\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 2 960 918,36\n0,00\n– 2 960 918,36\nIrregularities\n2010\nCases escaping the application of the 50/50 rule due to their late evaluation\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 9 569,59\n0,00\n– 9 569,59\nIrregularities\n2010\nCases not reported in the Annex III table or reported with an improper PACA escaping the application of the 50/50 rule\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 7 884,99\n0,00\n– 7 884,99\nIrregularities\n2010\ninterests not reported in the Annex III table, escaping the application of the 50/50 rule\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 4 171 977,5\n0,00\n– 4 171 977,5\nIrregularities\n2015\nNon respect of diligence pursuing to article 32(5) R. 1290/2005\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 1 402 884,37\n0,00\n– 1 402 884,37\nIrregularities\n2010\npre-debts not converted into debts within 1 year after the PACA\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 10 853 421,42\n0,00\n– 10 853 421,42\nIrregularities\n2010\nUnvalued debts, escaping the application of the 50/50 rule\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 6 653,47\n0,00\n– 6 653,47\nPromotion Measures\n2010\nweakness in the control of the selection of the implementing body (competitive procedure not adequate)\nFLAT RATE\n25,00 %\nEUR\n– 205 820,79\n0,00\n– 205 820,79\nPromotion Measures\n2011\nweakness in the control of the selection of the implementing body (competitive procedure not adequate)\nFLAT RATE\n25,00 %\nEUR\n– 239 784,46\n0,00\n– 239 784,46\nPromotion Measures\n2012\nweakness in the control of the selection of the implementing body (competitive procedure not adequate)\nFLAT RATE\n25,00 %\nEUR\n– 219 122,42\n0,00\n– 219 122,42\nPromotion Measures\n2013\nweakness in the control of the selection of the implementing body (competitive procedure not adequate)\nFLAT RATE\n25,00 %\nEUR\n– 40 407,41\n0,00\n– 40 407,41\nTotal FR:\nEUR\n– 47 104 889,54\n0,00\n– 47 104 889,54\nMember State\nMeasure\nFY\nReason\nType\nCorrection %\nCurrency\nAmount\nDeductions\nFinancial Impact\nGB\nCertification\n2012\nAdjustments regarding the reimbursements to the Paying Agency\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 10 766,0\n– 236,42\n– 10 529,58\nDecoupled Direct Aids\n2014\nLack of retroactive recoveries claim years 2013 and 2014, Art.80 of R.1122/2009\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 819 832,0\n0,00\n– 819 832,0\nTotal GB:\nEUR\n– 830 598,0\n– 236,42\n– 830 361,58\nMember State\nMeasure\nFY\nReason\nType\nCorrection %\nCurrency\nAmount\nDeductions\nFinancial Impact\nHU\nCross Compliance\n2013\nApplication of tolerance for animal identification, no evaluation of minor non-compliances, leniency in the sanctioning system, grace period for replacing ear tags, CY2012\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 345 104,16\n0,00\n– 345 104,16\nWine — Investment\n2013\nDeficiency of control on the eligibility criteria of the investment\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 141 511,53\n0,00\n– 141 511,53\nWine — Investment\n2014\nDeficiency of control on the eligibility criteria of the investment\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 132 732,62\n0,00\n– 132 732,62\nWine — Investment\n2015\nDeficiency of control on the eligibility criteria of the investment\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 65 771,82\n0,00\n– 65 771,82\nDecoupled Direct Aids\n2012\nlack of retroactive procedure 2008 — 2013\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 27 454 967,41\n0,00\n– 27 454 967,41\nDecoupled Direct Aids\n2013\nlack of retroactive procedure 2008 — 2013\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 1 205 419,21\n0,00\n– 1 205 419,21\nCross Compliance\n2014\nNo evaluation of minor non-compliances, leniency in the sanctioning system, grace period for replacing ear tags, CY2013\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 85 272,17\n0,00\n– 85 272,17\nCross Compliance\n2015\nNo evaluation of minor non-compliances, leniency in the sanctioning system, grace period for replacing ear tags, CY2014\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 47 840,41\n0,00\n– 47 840,41\nDecoupled Direct Aids\n2012\nParcel identification for claim years 2011 and 2012\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 7 473,33\n0,00\n– 7 473,33\nDecoupled Direct Aids\n2013\nParcel identification for claim years 2011 and 2012\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 7 473,32\n0,00\n– 7 473,32\nDecoupled Direct Aids\n2012\nDeficiencies in risk analysis, claim years 2011, 2012 and 2013\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 7 038 944,95\n0,00\n– 7 038 944,95\nDecoupled Direct Aids\n2013\nDeficiencies in risk analysis, claim years 2011, 2012 and 2013\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 3 371 318,84\n0,00\n– 3 371 318,84\nDecoupled Direct Aids\n2014\nDeficiencies in risk analysis, claim years 2011, 2012 and 2013\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 1 348 980,52\n0,00\n– 1 348 980,52\nDecoupled Direct Aids\n2013\nDeficiencies in risk analysis, claim years 2012 and 2013\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 7 038 944,95\n0,00\n– 7 038 944,95\nDecoupled Direct Aids\n2014\nDeficiencies in risk analysis, claim years 2012 and 2013\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 10 410 263,79\n0,00\n– 10 410 263,79\nTotal HU:\nEUR\n– 58 702 019,03\n0,00\n– 58 702 019,03\nMember State\nMeasure\nFY\nReason\nType\nCorrection %\nCurrency\nAmount\nDeductions\nFinancial Impact\nIT\nCertification\n2013\n20 % recovery costs discounted too late\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 65 518,44\n0,00\n– 65 518,44\nSchool Fruit Scheme\n2012\nAbsence of checks in communication costs\nFLAT RATE\n10,00 %\nEUR\n– 54 596,43\n0,00\n– 54 596,43\nSchool Fruit Scheme\n2013\nAbsence of checks in communication costs\nFLAT RATE\n10,00 %\nEUR\n– 43 039,98\n0,00\n– 43 039,98\nSchool Fruit Scheme\n2014\nAbsence of checks in communication costs\nFLAT RATE\n10,00 %\nEUR\n– 56 718,12\n0,00\n– 56 718,12\nWine — Restructuring\n2012\nFailure to apply properly the control established by Article 79 of Regulation (EC) No 555/2008\nFLAT RATE\n2,00 %\nEUR\n– 851,44\n0,00\n– 851,44\nWine — Restructuring\n2013\nFailure to apply properly the control established by Article 79 of Regulation (EC) No 555/2008\nFLAT RATE\n2,00 %\nEUR\n– 354 700,47\n0,00\n– 354 700,47\nWine — Restructuring\n2014\nFailure to apply properly the control established by Article 79 of Regulation (EC) No 555/2008\nFLAT RATE\n2,00 %\nEUR\n– 360 360,05\n0,00\n– 360 360,05\nOther Direct Aid — Article 68-72 of Reg.73/2009\n2012\nIncorrect application of reductions\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 6 558,38\n0,00\n– 6 558,38\nOther Direct Aid — Article 68-72 of Reg.73/2009\n2013\nIncorrect calculation of reductions\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 334,77\n0,00\n– 334,77\nSchool Fruit Scheme\n2012\nNon compliance with public procurement provisions\nFLAT RATE\n25,00 %\nEUR\n– 4 170 834,38\n0,00\n– 4 170 834,38\nSchool Fruit Scheme\n2013\nNon compliance with public procurement provisions\nFLAT RATE\n25,00 %\nEUR\n– 4 779 213,02\n0,00\n– 4 779 213,02\nOther Direct Aid — Article 68-72 of Reg.73/2009\n2012\nPayment of ineligible animals\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 935,59\n0,00\n– 935,59\nOther Direct Aid — Article 68-72 of Reg.73/2009\n2013\nPayment of ineligible animals\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 1 139,51\n0,00\n– 1 139,51\nCertification\n2013\nproblem to respect aids payment within five working days\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 37 986,2\n0,00\n– 37 986,2\nOther Direct Aid — Article 68-72 of Reg.73/2009\n2012\nRate of on-the-spot checks and size of the sample for on-the-spot checks not respected\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 2 035 878,67\n– 6 474,85\n– 2 029 403,82\nOther Direct Aid — Article 68-72 of Reg.73/2009\n2013\nRate of on-the-spot checks and size of the sample for on-the-spot checks not respected\nFLAT RATE\n2,00 %\nEUR\n– 366 823,4\n– 29,48\n– 366 793,92\nOther Direct Aid — Article 68-72 of Reg.73/2009\n2014\nRate of on-the-spot checks and size of the sample for on-the-spot checks not respected\nFLAT RATE\n2,00 %\nEUR\n– 360 765,32\n0,00\n– 360 765,32\nTotal IT:\nEUR\n– 12 696 254,17\n– 6 504,33\n– 12 689 749,84\nMember State\nMeasure\nFY\nReason\nType\nCorrection %\nCurrency\nAmount\nDeductions\nFinancial Impact\nNL\nIrregularities\n2010\nNo recovery action taken by Dutch authorities as regarding irregularity detected in an OLAF investigation in 2000.\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 424 837,9\n0,00\n– 424 837,9\nTotal NL:\nEUR\n– 424 837,9\n0,00\n– 424 837,9\nMember State\nMeasure\nFY\nReason\nType\nCorrection %\nCurrency\nAmount\nDeductions\nFinancial Impact\nPL\nCertification\n2013\nCases for which the PA decided not to pursue a recovery\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 11 155,11\n0,00\n– 11 155,11\nFruit and Vegetables — Pre-recognised Producer Groups\n2012\nWeaknesses in key controls, especially as regards checks on recognition plans and on recognition criteria\nFLAT RATE\n25,00 %\nEUR\n– 64 974 750,82\n– 25 989 900,32\n– 38 984 850,5\nFruit and Vegetables — Pre-recognised Producer Groups\n2013\nWeaknesses in key controls, especially as regards checks on recognition plans and on recognition criteria\nFLAT RATE\n25,00 %\nEUR\n– 76 816 098,12\n0,00\n– 76 816 098,12\nTotal PL:\nEUR\n– 141 802 004,05\n– 25 989 900,32\n– 115 812 103,73\nMember State\nMeasure\nFY\nReason\nType\nCorrection %\nCurrency\nAmount\nDeductions\nFinancial Impact\nPT\nOther Direct Aid — POSEI\n2012\nNormal inspection activity was funded from the technical assistance heading of the POSEI sub-programme for the Azores\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 460 202,73\n0,00\n– 460 202,73\nOther Direct Aid — POSEI\n2013\nNormal inspection activity was funded from the technical assistance heading of the POSEI sub-programme for the Azores\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 200 000,0\n0,00\n– 200 000,0\nFood Aid within the Community\n2010\nweakness of a key control for ‘follow up of controls’ (stock accounting) from 1.9.2010 to the end of ‘most deprived’ programme 2010\nFLAT RATE\n2,00 %\nEUR\n– 390 318,22\n0,00\n– 390 318,22\nFood Aid within the Community\n2011\nweakness of a key control for ‘follow up of controls’ (stock accounting) from 1.9.2010 to the end of ‘most deprived’ programme 2010\nFLAT RATE\n2,00 %\nEUR\n– 374 320,14\n0,00\n– 374 320,14\nFood Aid within the Community\n2012\nweakness of a key control for ‘follow up of controls’ (stock accounting) from 1.9.2010 to the end of ‘most deprived’ programme 2010\nFLAT RATE\n2,00 %\nEUR\n– 381 406,97\n0,00\n– 381 406,97\nTotal PT:\nEUR\n– 1 806 248,06\n0,00\n– 1 806 248,06\nMember State\nMeasure\nFY\nReason\nType\nCorrection %\nCurrency\nAmount\nDeductions\nFinancial Impact\nRO\nCross Compliance\n2011\nAbsence of risk analysis for animal identification SMRs, SMR1 and 5 not checked for all farmers, no specific criteria for the selection of the parcel during OTSC, CY2012\nFLAT RATE\n2,00 %\nEUR\n– 21 404,36\n– 25,22\n– 21 379,14\nCross Compliance\n2012\nAbsence of risk analysis for animal identification SMRs, SMR1 and 5 not checked for all farmers, no specific criteria for the selection of the parcel during OTSC, CY2012\nFLAT RATE\n2,00 %\nEUR\n– 14 469,3\n– 19,41\n– 14 449,89\nCross Compliance\n2013\nAbsence of risk analysis for animal identification SMRs, SMR1 and 5 not checked for all farmers, no specific criteria for the selection of the parcel during OTSC, CY2012\nFLAT RATE\n2,00 %\nEUR\n– 651 591,27\n– 874,73\n– 650 716,54\nOther Direct Aid — Article 68-72 of Reg.73/2009\n2013\nAnimals not in the herd register\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 1 121,04\n0,00\n– 1 121,04\nOther Direct Aid — Article 68-72 of Reg.73/2009\n2014\nAnimals not in the herd register\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 285,82\n0,00\n– 285,82\nOther Direct Aid — Article 68-72 of Reg.73/2009\n2013\nDeficient on-the-spot checks\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 43 624,29\n0,00\n– 43 624,29\nOther Direct Aid — Article 68-72 of Reg.73/2009\n2014\nDeficient on-the-spot checks\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 135 630,95\n0,00\n– 135 630,95\nOther Direct Aid — Article 68-72 of Reg.73/2009\n2015\nDeficient on-the-spot checks\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 237 720,0\n0,00\n– 237 720,0\nCertification\n2010\nerror in the debt management system FY2010 EAGF\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 2 776,25\n0,00\n– 2 776,25\nCertification\n2011\nerror in the debt management system FY2011 EAGF\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 1 261,1\n0,00\n– 1 261,1\nScrutiny of transactions\n2010\nWeaknesses in administrative framework and insufficient quality of scrutiny FY 2010\nFLAT RATE\n0,50 %\nEUR\n– 49 843,71\n0,00\n– 49 843,71\nScrutiny of transactions\n2011\nWeaknesses in administrative framework and insufficient quality of scrutiny FY 2011\nFLAT RATE\n0,50 %\nEUR\n– 239 834,11\n0,00\n– 239 834,11\nScrutiny of transactions\n2012\nWeaknesses in administrative framework and insufficient quality of scrutiny FY 2012\nFLAT RATE\n0,50 %\nEUR\n– 55 896,1\n0,00\n– 55 896,1\nTotal RO:\nEUR\n– 1 455 458,3\n– 919,36\n– 1 454 538,94\nMember State\nMeasure\nFY\nReason\nType\nCorrection %\nCurrency\nAmount\nDeductions\nFinancial Impact\nSE\nFruit and Vegetables — Operational Programmes\n2010\nunduly recognition\nONE OFF\n0,00 %\nEUR\n– 451 853,95\n0,00\n– 451 853,95\nFruit and Vegetables — Operational Programmes\n2011\nunduly recognition\nONE OFF\n0,00 %\nEUR\n– 349 305,95\n0,00\n– 349 305,95\nFruit and Vegetables — Operational Programmes\n2010\nweaknesses in key controls\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 27 794,7\n– 7 638,1\n– 20 156,6\nFruit and Vegetables — Operational Programmes\n2010\nweaknesses in key controls\nFLAT RATE\n10,00 %\nEUR\n– 383 072,07\n– 29 585,26\n– 353 486,81\nFruit and Vegetables — Operational Programmes\n2011\nweaknesses in key controls\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 117 435,73\n– 17 465,3\n– 99 970,43\nTotal SE:\nEUR\n– 1 329 462,4\n– 54 688,66\n– 1 274 773,74\nMember State\nMeasure\nFY\nReason\nType\nCorrection %\nCurrency\nAmount\nDeductions\nFinancial Impact\nSI\nCross Compliance\n2013\nWeaknesses in the OTSC's of SMR 1, SMR 16, SMR 17, SMR 18 and the evaluation grid. CY 2012\nFLAT RATE\n2,00 %\nEUR\n– 1 590,84\n0,00\n– 1 590,84\nCross Compliance\n2014\nWeaknesses in the OTSC's of SMR 1, SMR 16, SMR 17, SMR 18 and the evaluation grid. CY 2012\nFLAT RATE\n2,00 %\nEUR\n– 19,96\n0,00\n– 19,96\nCross Compliance\n2014\nWeaknesses in the OTSC's of SMR 1, SMR 16, SMR 17, SMR 18 and the evaluation grid. CY 2013\nFLAT RATE\n2,00 %\nEUR\n– 280 043,67\n0,00\n– 280 043,67\nCross Compliance\n2013\nWeaknesses in the OTSC's of SMR 1, SMR 16, SMR 17, SMR 18 and the evaluation grid. CY 2014\nFLAT RATE\n2,00 %\nEUR\n– 8 439,51\n0,00\n– 8 439,51\nCross Compliance\n2015\nWeaknesses in the OTSC's of SMR 1, SMR 16, SMR 17, SMR 18 and the evaluation grid. CY 2014\nFLAT RATE\n2,00 %\nEUR\n– 271 939,48\n– 68,42\n– 271 871,06\nTotal SI:\nEUR\n– 562 033,46\n– 68,42\n– 561 965,04\nMember State\nMeasure\nFY\nReason\nType\nCorrection %\nCurrency\nAmount\nDeductions\nFinancial Impact\nSK\nCross Compliance\n2012\nOne GAEC not defined, inadequate control of several SMRs, leniency of the sanctioning system for animal identification, CY2011\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 1 591 159,4\n– 8 695,79\n– 1 582 463,61\nCross Compliance\n2013\nOne GAEC not defined, inadequate control of several SMRs, leniency of the sanctioning system for animal identification, CY2011\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 2 181,65\n– 11,91\n– 2 169,74\nCross Compliance\n2014\nOne GAEC not defined, inadequate control of several SMRs, leniency of the sanctioning system for animal identification, CY2011\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 734,05\n0,00\n– 734,05\nCross Compliance\n2011\nOne GAEC not defined, inadequate control of several SMRs, leniency of the sanctioning system for animal identification, CY2012\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 2 995,21\n0,00\n– 2 995,21\nCross Compliance\n2012\nOne GAEC not defined, inadequate control of several SMRs, leniency of the sanctioning system for animal identification, CY2012\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 534,75\n0,00\n– 534,75\nCross Compliance\n2013\nOne GAEC not defined, inadequate control of several SMRs, leniency of the sanctioning system for animal identification, CY2012\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 1 764 473,62\n0,00\n– 1 764 473,62\nCross Compliance\n2014\nOne GAEC not defined, inadequate control of several SMRs, leniency of the sanctioning system for animal identification, CY2012\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 798,08\n0,00\n– 798,08\nCross Compliance\n2012\nOne GAEC not defined, inadequate control of several SMRs, leniency of the sanctioning system for animal identification, CY2013\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 965,25\n0,00\n– 965,25\nCross Compliance\n2013\nOne GAEC not defined, inadequate control of several SMRs, leniency of the sanctioning system for animal identification, CY2013\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 985,39\n0,00\n– 985,39\nCross Compliance\n2014\nOne GAEC not defined, inadequate control of several SMRs, leniency of the sanctioning system for animal identification, CY2013\nFLAT RATE\n2,00 %\nEUR\n– 740 795,43\n0,00\n– 740 795,43\nTotal SK:\nEUR\n– 4 105 622,83\n– 8 707,7\n– 4 096 915,13\nCurrency\nAmount\nDeductions\nFinancial Impact\nEUR\n– 303 063 043,74\n– 29 516 613,25\n– 273 546 430,49",
  "extent": "E+W+S+N.I.",
  "status": null,
  "version": "current",
  "annotations": [],
  "outstanding_effects": [],
  "provenance": {
    "source": "legislation.gov.uk",
    "source_url": "https://www.legislation.gov.uk/eudn/2016/2018/annex/division/3",
    "retrieved_at": "2026-11-01T15:13:46.649263+00:00"
  },
  "licence": "Open Government Licence v3.0",
  "licence_url": "https://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/version/3/",
  "attribution": "Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Source: legislation.gov.uk, The National Archives."
}