{
  "url": "https://openlegislation.uk/eu-decision-2016-2018/annex/division-4",
  "json_url": "https://openlegislation.uk/eu-decision-2016-2018/annex/division-4.json",
  "legislation": "eudn/2016/2018",
  "legislation_title": "Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2016/2018 of 15 November 2016 excluding from European Union financing certain expenditure incurred by the Member States under the European Agricultural Guarantee Fund (EAGF) and under the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) (notified under document C(2016) 7232) (Only the Bulgarian, Danish, Dutch, English, Finnish, French, German, Greek, Hungarian, Italian, Maltese, Latvian, Polish, Portuguese, Romanian, Slovak, Slovenian, Spanish, Swedish texts are authentic)",
  "legislation_url": "https://openlegislation.uk/eu-decision-2016-2018",
  "path": "annex/division/4",
  "kind": "division",
  "number": null,
  "heading": "Budget Item: 6711",
  "text": "Member State\nMeasure\nFY\nReason\nType\nCorrection %\nCurrency\nAmount\nDeductions\nFinancial Impact\nBE\nCertification\n2014\nKnown error for EAFRD IACS population\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 24 230,01\n– 48,86\n– 24 181,15\nCertification\n2014\nMLE for the EAFRD non-IACS population\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 123 429,41\n0,00\n– 123 429,41\nCertification\n2014\nMLE for the EAFRD IACS population\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 110 788,1\n– 223,42\n– 110 564,68\nCross Compliance\n2013\nLimited scope of checks of SMRs 1, 2, 4 and 5 — No follow-up of minor non-compliances — Deficient risk analysis for checks by veterinary services — CY 2012\nFLAT RATE\n2,00 %\nEUR\n– 19 570,41\n0,00\n– 19 570,41\nCross Compliance\n2014\nLimited scope of checks of SMRs 1, 2, 4 and 5 — No follow-up of minor non-compliances — Deficient risk analysis for checks by veterinary services — CY 2012\nFLAT RATE\n2,00 %\nEUR\n280,00\n0,00\n280,00\nCross Compliance\n2013\nLimited scope of checks of SMRs 1, 2, 4 and 5 — No follow-up of minor non-compliances — Deficient risk analysis for checks by veterinary services — CY 2013\nFLAT RATE\n2,00 %\nEUR\n1,07\n0,00\n1,07\nCross Compliance\n2014\nLimited scope of checks of SMRs 1, 2, 4 and 5 — No follow-up of minor non-compliances — Deficient risk analysis for checks by veterinary services — CY 2013\nFLAT RATE\n2,00 %\nEUR\n– 16 006,55\n0,00\n– 16 006,55\nTotal BE:\nEUR\n– 293 743,41\n– 272,28\n– 293 471,13\nMember State\nMeasure\nFY\nReason\nType\nCorrection %\nCurrency\nAmount\nDeductions\nFinancial Impact\nBG\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 1 — Measures with flat rate support\n2015\nLack of checks on requirement for semi-subsistence holdings to market part of their output\nFLAT RATE\n10,00 %\nEUR\n– 187 091,42\n0,00\n– 187 091,42\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 1 — Measures with flat rate support (2007-2013)\n2013\nLack of checks on requirement for semi-subsistence holdings to market part of their output\nFLAT RATE\n10,00 %\nEUR\n– 365 906,63\n0,00\n– 365 906,63\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 1 — Measures with flat rate support\n2014\nLack of checks on requirement for semi-subsistence holdings to market part of their output\nFLAT RATE\n10,00 %\nEUR\n– 812 405,82\n0,00\n– 812 405,82\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 1+3 — Investment orientated measures (2007-2013)\n2011\nPreferential sales price of electricity not included in the check against double financing\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 436 311,22\n0,00\n– 436 311,22\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 1+3 — Investment orientated measures (2007-2013)\n2012\nPreferential sales price of electricity not included in the check against double financing\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 3 218 840,38\n0,00\n– 3 218 840,38\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 1+3 — Investment orientated measures (2007-2013)\n2013\nPreferential sales price of electricity not included in the check against double financing\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 1 121 595,0\n0,00\n– 1 121 595,0\nTotal BG:\nEUR\n– 6 142 150,47\n0,00\n– 6 142 150,47\nMember State\nMeasure\nFY\nReason\nType\nCorrection %\nCurrency\nAmount\nDeductions\nFinancial Impact\nDE\nCertification\n2013\nFinancial errors identified by the Certification Body\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 977,11\n0,00\n– 977,11\nCertification\n2014\nFinancial errors identified by the Certification Body\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 708,76\n0,00\n– 708,76\nCertification\n2012\nFinancial errors identified by the CB\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 496,49\n0,00\n– 496,49\nTotal DE:\nEUR\n– 2 182,36\n0,00\n– 2 182,36\nMember State\nMeasure\nFY\nReason\nType\nCorrection %\nCurrency\nAmount\nDeductions\nFinancial Impact\nDK\nCertification\n2012\nEAFRD MLE\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 1 001 809,47\n– 307 761,24\n– 694 048,23\nCertification\n2014\nError detected in the re-performance of OTSC in the EAFRD non-IACS population\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 2,01\n0,00\n– 2,01\nCertification\n2014\nErrors detected in the re-performance of OTSC in the EAFRD IACS population\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 93,35\n0,00\n– 93,35\nCertification\n2013\nFinancial errors identified in the compliance testing for the EAFRD non-IACS population\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 126,37\n– 3,35\n– 123,02\nCertification\n2013\nMLE for the EAFRD non-IACS population\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 837 801,3\n– 15 027,43\n– 822 773,87\nCertification\n2014\nMLE in the EAFRD non-IACS population\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 193 310,8\n– 4 445,75\n– 188 865,05\nCertification\n2012\nNot recovered financial errors from FY2012\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 105,59\n– 0,63\n– 104,96\nTotal DK:\nEUR\n– 2 033 248,89\n– 327 238,4\n– 1 706 010,49\nMember State\nMeasure\nFY\nReason\nType\nCorrection %\nCurrency\nAmount\nDeductions\nFinancial Impact\nES\nCross Compliance\n2012\nDeficiencies in the effectiveness of OTSC, partial coverage of 7 SMRs, incorrect treatment of late notification and of missing ear tags (SMR7 and 8), CY 2011\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 218 631,8\n0,00\n– 218 631,8\nCross Compliance\n2013\nDeficiencies in the effectiveness of OTSC, partial coverage of 7 SMRs, incorrect treatment of late notification and of missing ear tags (SMR7 and 8), CY 2011\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 43 203,42\n0,00\n– 43 203,42\nCross Compliance\n2012\nDeficiencies in the effectiveness of OTSC, partial coverage of 7 SMRs, incorrect treatment of late notification and of missing ear tags (SMR7 and 8), CY 2012\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 5,43\n0,00\n– 5,43\nCross Compliance\n2013\nDeficiencies in the effectiveness of OTSC, partial coverage of 7 SMRs, incorrect treatment of late notification and of missing ear tags (SMR7 and 8), CY 2012\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 171 297,45\n0,00\n– 171 297,45\nCertification\n2013\nEAFRD non-IACS population outstanding corrections from previous years.\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 13 337,67\n– 13 324,84\n– 12,83\nCertification\n2013\nErrors identified in the substantive testing of EAFRD non-IACS population. MLE.\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 110 102,63\n– 4 469,05\n– 105 633,58\nCertification\n2012\nExtrapolated error for EAFRD non-IACS population\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 2 532 066,96\n– 494 665,62\n– 2 037 401,34\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 1+3 — Investment orientated measures (2007-2013)\n2009\nM125: the controls on the eligibility of the projects under M125 not satisfactory\nFLAT RATE\n10,00 %\nEUR\n– 5 995,99\n0,00\n– 5 995,99\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 1+3 — Investment orientated measures (2007-2013)\n2012\nM125: the controls on the eligibility of the projects under M125 not satisfactory\nFLAT RATE\n10,00 %\nEUR\n– 227 944,41\n0,00\n– 227 944,41\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 1+3 — Investment orientated measures (2007-2013)\n2010\nWeaknesses in M 123: selection criteria; costs reasonableness assessment; verification of the SME criteria\nFLAT RATE\n10,00 %\nEUR\n– 2 758,71\n– 1 090,07\n– 1 668,64\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 1+3 — Investment orientated measures (2007-2013)\n2011\nWeaknesses in M 123: selection criteria; costs reasonableness assessment; verification of the SME criteria\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 5 565,88\n0,00\n– 5 565,88\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 1+3 — Investment orientated measures (2007-2013)\n2011\nWeaknesses in M 123: selection criteria; costs reasonableness assessment; verification of the SME criteria\nFLAT RATE\n10,00 %\nEUR\n– 397 882,31\n0,00\n– 397 882,31\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 1+3 — Investment orientated measures (2007-2013)\n2012\nWeaknesses in M 123: selection criteria; costs reasonableness assessment; verification of the SME criteria\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 11 170,64\n0,00\n– 11 170,64\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 1+3 — Investment orientated measures (2007-2013)\n2012\nWeaknesses in M 123: selection criteria; costs reasonableness assessment; verification of the SME criteria\nFLAT RATE\n10,00 %\nEUR\n– 1 528 198,12\n0,00\n– 1 528 198,12\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 1+3 — Investment orientated measures (2007-2013)\n2013\nWeaknesses in M 123: selection criteria; costs reasonableness assessment; verification of the SME criteria\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 91 853,9\n0,00\n– 91 853,9\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 1+3 — Investment orientated measures (2007-2013)\n2013\nWeaknesses in M 123: selection criteria; costs reasonableness assessment; verification of the SME criteria\nFLAT RATE\n10,00 %\nEUR\n– 1 574 201,32\n0,00\n– 1 574 201,32\nRural Development EAFRD Investment — private beneficiaries\n2014\nWeaknesses in M 123: selection criteria; costs reasonableness assessment; verification of the SME criteria\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 51 302,36\n0,00\n– 51 302,36\nRural Development EAFRD Investment — private beneficiaries\n2014\nWeaknesses in M 123: selection criteria; costs reasonableness assessment; verification of the SME criteria\nFLAT RATE\n10,00 %\nEUR\n– 1 022 883,1\n0,00\n– 1 022 883,1\nTotal ES:\nEUR\n– 8 008 402,1\n– 513 549,58\n– 7 494 852,52\nMember State\nMeasure\nFY\nReason\nType\nCorrection %\nCurrency\nAmount\nDeductions\nFinancial Impact\nFI\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 4 LEADER (2007-2013)\n2012\nWeakness in verification of the reasonableness of costs in Measure 413\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 166 858,19\n0,00\n– 166 858,19\nTotal FI:\nEUR\n– 166 858,19\n0,00\n– 166 858,19\nMember State\nMeasure\nFY\nReason\nType\nCorrection %\nCurrency\nAmount\nDeductions\nFinancial Impact\nGB\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 4 LEADER (2007-2013)\n2013\nLack of appropriate checks on double financing (key control)\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 3 008,34\n0,00\n– 3 008,34\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 4 LEADER (2007-2013)\n2013\nLack of appropriate checks on the eligibility of the costs of the operation (key control)\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 204 505,57\n0,00\n– 204 505,57\nTotal GB:\nEUR\n– 207 513,91\n0,00\n– 207 513,91\nMember State\nMeasure\nFY\nReason\nType\nCorrection %\nCurrency\nAmount\nDeductions\nFinancial Impact\nIE\nCertification\n2014\nKnown errors identified in the EAFRD IACS population\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 4 006,11\n0,00\n– 4 006,11\nCertification\n2014\nKnown errors identified in the EAFRD Non IACS population\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 7 553,44\n– 62,31\n– 7 491,13\nTotal IE:\nEUR\n– 11 559,55\n– 62,31\n– 11 497,24\nMember State\nMeasure\nFY\nReason\nType\nCorrection %\nCurrency\nAmount\nDeductions\nFinancial Impact\nIT\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 1+3 — Investment orientated measures (2007-2013)\n2011\nNumber of errors in the files resulting from a weak control system.\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 322 955,33\n– 119 880,04\n– 203 075,29\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 1+3 — others (2007-2013)\n2012\nNumber of errors in the files resulting from a weak control system.\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 17 259,86\n0,00\n– 17 259,86\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 1+3 — Investment orientated measures (2007-2013)\n2012\nNumber of errors in the files resulting from a weak control system.\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 1 048 678,11\n– 105 713,76\n– 942 964,35\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 1+3 — Investment orientated measures (2007-2013)\n2013\nNumber of errors in the files resulting from a weak control system.\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 1 610 347,46\n– 8 580,0\n– 1 601 767,46\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 1 (2007-2013)\n2007\nOn-the-spot checks risk analysis not properly updated\nFLAT RATE\n2,00 %\nEUR\n– 9 065,98\n– 1 091,16\n– 7 974,82\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 1+3 — Investment orientated measures (2007-2013)\n2008\nOn-the-spot checks risk analysis not properly updated\nFLAT RATE\n2,00 %\nEUR\n– 407,39\n0,00\n– 407,39\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 1+3 — Investment orientated measures (2007-2013)\n2009\nOn-the-spot checks risk analysis not properly updated\nFLAT RATE\n2,00 %\nEUR\n– 4 029,2\n– 588,01\n– 3 441,19\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 1+3 — Investment orientated measures (2007-2013)\n2010\nOn-the-spot checks risk analysis not properly updated\nFLAT RATE\n2,00 %\nEUR\n– 45 823,63\n– 2 648,46\n– 43 175,17\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 1+3 — Investment orientated measures (2007-2013)\n2011\nOn-the-spot checks risk analysis not properly updated\nFLAT RATE\n2,00 %\nEUR\n– 93 330,46\n– 3 893,24\n– 89 437,22\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 1+3 — Investment orientated measures (2007-2013)\n2012\nOn-the-spot checks risk analysis not properly updated\nFLAT RATE\n2,00 %\nEUR\n– 320 482,97\n– 25 971,96\n– 294 511,01\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 1+3 — Investment orientated measures (2007-2013)\n2013\nOn-the-spot checks risk analysis not properly updated\nFLAT RATE\n2,00 %\nEUR\n– 424 992,5\n– 47 702,52\n– 377 289,98\nRural Development EAFRD Investment — private beneficiaries\n2014\nOn-the-spot checks risk analysis not properly updated\nFLAT RATE\n2,00 %\nEUR\n– 178 543,97\n– 21 276,84\n– 157 267,13\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 1 (2007-2013)\n2007\nReasonableness of the costs not properly assessed\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 2 727,89\n0,00\n– 2 727,89\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 1+3 — Investment orientated measures (2007-2013)\n2009\nReasonableness of the costs not properly assessed\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 1 470,04\n0,00\n– 1 470,04\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 1+3 — Investment orientated measures (2007-2013)\n2010\nReasonableness of the costs not properly assessed\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 6 621,14\n0,00\n– 6 621,14\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 1+3 — Investment orientated measures (2007-2013)\n2011\nReasonableness of the costs not properly assessed\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 9 733,1\n0,00\n– 9 733,1\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 1+3 — Investment orientated measures (2007-2013)\n2012\nReasonableness of the costs not properly assessed\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 64 929,91\n0,00\n– 64 929,91\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 1+3 — Investment orientated measures (2007-2013)\n2013\nReasonableness of the costs not properly assessed\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 119 256,29\n0,00\n– 119 256,29\nRural Development EAFRD Investment — private beneficiaries\n2014\nReasonableness of the costs not properly assessed\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 53 192,08\n0,00\n– 53 192,08\nTotal IT:\nEUR\n– 4 333 847,31\n– 337 345,99\n– 3 996 501,32\nMember State\nMeasure\nFY\nReason\nType\nCorrection %\nCurrency\nAmount\nDeductions\nFinancial Impact\nMT\nCertification\n2014\nFinancial errors detected in the' compliance testing of the EAFRD Non-IACS population and known errors in the Advances & Securities of the EAFRD expenditure.\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 73 406,0\n0,00\n– 73 406,0\nTotal MT:\nEUR\n– 73 406,0\n0,00\n– 73 406,0\nMember State\nMeasure\nFY\nReason\nType\nCorrection %\nCurrency\nAmount\nDeductions\nFinancial Impact\nNL\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 1+3 — Investment orientated measures (2007-2013)\n2013\nExclude expenditure due to lack of procurement procedure\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 85 000,0\n0,00\n– 85 000,0\nRural Development EAFRD Investment — public beneficiaries\n2014\nWeaknesses in the checks of the procurement correction based on the recalculation of the error rate\nEXTRAPOLATED\n0,81 %\nEUR\n– 105 036,34\n0,00\n– 105 036,34\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 1+3 — Investment orientated measures (2007-2013)\n2013\nWeaknesses in the checks of the public procurement, based on the recalculation of the error rate\nEXTRAPOLATED\n0,81 %\nEUR\n– 116 704,26\n– 328,69\n– 116 375,57\nRural Development EAFRD Investment — public beneficiaries\n2014\nWeaknesses in the checks of the reasonableness of the cost correction applied on 52,26 % of the expenditure\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 709 760,04\n0,00\n– 709 760,04\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 1+3 — Investment orientated measures (2007-2013)\n2013\nWeaknesses in the checks of the reasonableness of the costs, correction applied on 52,26 % of the expenditure\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 788 603,51\n– 2 221,05\n– 786 382,46\nTotal NL:\nEUR\n– 1 805 104,15\n– 2 549,74\n– 1 802 554,41\nMember State\nMeasure\nFY\nReason\nType\nCorrection %\nCurrency\nAmount\nDeductions\nFinancial Impact\nPT\nRural Development EAFRD Investment — private beneficiaries\n2010\nInsufficient assessment of the reasonableness of the investment costs\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 278 756,48\n0,00\n– 278 756,48\nRural Development EAFRD Investment — private beneficiaries\n2011\nInsufficient assessment of the reasonableness of the investment costs\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 757 851,45\n– 271 077,6\n– 486 773,85\nRural Development EAFRD Investment — private beneficiaries\n2012\nInsufficient assessment of the reasonableness of the investment costs\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 419 869,93\n– 55 060,96\n– 364 808,97\nRural Development EAFRD Investment — private beneficiaries\n2013\nInsufficient assessment of the reasonableness of the investment costs\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 324 408,44\n0,00\n– 324 408,44\nRural Development EAFRD Investment — private beneficiaries\n2014\nInsufficient assessment of the reasonableness of the investment costs\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 209 924,0\n0,00\n– 209 924,0\nTotal PT:\nEUR\n– 1 990 810,3\n– 326 138,56\n– 1 664 671,74\nMember State\nMeasure\nFY\nReason\nType\nCorrection %\nCurrency\nAmount\nDeductions\nFinancial Impact\nRO\nCross Compliance\n2013\nAbsence of risk analysis for animal identification SMRs, SMR1 and 5 not checked for all farmers, no specific criteria for the selection of the parcel during OTSC, CY2012\nFLAT RATE\n2,00 %\nEUR\n– 97 630,09\n0,00\n– 97 630,09\nCertification\n2010\nMLE EAFRD Non-IACS population FY2010\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 4 653 241,82\n– 275 778,82\n– 4 377 463,0\nCertification\n2011\nMLE EAFRD Non-IACS population FY2011\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 3 210 679,11\n– 267 668,25\n– 2 943 010,86\nCross Compliance\n2012\nNo control of the minimum requirement for the use of plant protection products and inefficient control of the minimum requirement for the use of fertilisers, CY2011\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 887 541,5\n0,00\n– 887 541,5\nCross Compliance\n2013\nNo control of the minimum requirement for the use of plant protection products and inefficient control of the minimum requirement for the use of fertilisers, CY2011\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 24 239,06\n0,00\n– 24 239,06\nCross Compliance\n2013\nNo control of the minimum requirement for the use of plant protection products and inefficient control of the minimum requirement for the use of fertilisers, CY2012\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 950 060,57\n0,00\n– 950 060,57\nCross Compliance\n2014\nNo control of the minimum requirement for the use of plant protection products and inefficient control of the minimum requirement for the use of fertilisers, CY2013\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 390 637,48\n0,00\n– 390 637,48\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area related measures)\n2010\nNon respect of 5 year commitment for AEM\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 975 531,89\n– 33 285,0\n– 942 246,89\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area related measures)\n2011\nNon respect of 5 year commitment for AEM\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 1 798 686,77\n– 89 934,34\n– 1 708 752,43\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area related measures)\n2012\nNon respect of 5 year commitment for AEM\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 2 866 913,52\n– 15 400,0\n– 2 851 513,52\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 1+3 — others (2007-2013)\n2012\nWeaknesses in: artificial conditions\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 148 810,96\n0,00\n– 148 810,96\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 1+3 — Investment orientated measures (2007-2013)\n2009\nWeaknesses in: artificial conditions and reasonableness of costs verification and selection criteria\nFLAT RATE\n25,00 %\nEUR\n– 11 702,85\n0,00\n– 11 702,85\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 1+3 — Investment orientated measures (2007-2013)\n2010\nWeaknesses in: artificial conditions and reasonableness of costs verification and selection criteria\nFLAT RATE\n25,00 %\nEUR\n– 321 762,57\n0,00\n– 321 762,57\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 1+3 — Investment orientated measures (2007-2013)\n2011\nWeaknesses in: artificial conditions and reasonableness of costs verification and selection criteria\nFLAT RATE\n25,00 %\nEUR\n– 14 714 299,52\n0,00\n– 14 714 299,52\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 1+3 — Investment orientated measures (2007-2013)\n2012\nWeaknesses in: artificial conditions and reasonableness of costs verification and selection criteria\nFLAT RATE\n25,00 %\nEUR\n– 7 046 834,54\n0,00\n– 7 046 834,54\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 1+3 — Investment orientated measures (2007-2013)\n2013\nWeaknesses in: artificial conditions and reasonableness of costs verification and selection criteria\nFLAT RATE\n25,00 %\nEUR\n– 5 791 393,96\n0,00\n– 5 791 393,96\nTotal RO:\nEUR\n– 43 889 966,21\n– 682 066,41\n– 43 207 899,8\nMember State\nMeasure\nFY\nReason\nType\nCorrection %\nCurrency\nAmount\nDeductions\nFinancial Impact\nSI\nCross Compliance\n2013\nWeaknesses in the OTSC's of SMR 1, SMR 16, SMR 17, SMR 18 and the evaluation grid. CY 2012\nFLAT RATE\n2,00 %\nEUR\n– 63 628,41\n0,00\n– 63 628,41\nCross Compliance\n2014\nWeaknesses in the OTSC's of SMR 1, SMR 16, SMR 17, SMR 18 and the evaluation grid. CY 2012\nFLAT RATE\n2,00 %\nEUR\n151,64\n0,00\n151,64\nCross Compliance\n2014\nWeaknesses in the OTSC's of SMR 1, SMR 16, SMR 17, SMR 18 and the evaluation grid. CY 2013\nFLAT RATE\n2,00 %\nEUR\n– 135 503,29\n0,00\n– 135 503,29\nCross Compliance\n2015\nWeaknesses in the OTSC's of SMR 1, SMR 16, SMR 17, SMR 18 and the evaluation grid. CY 2014\nFLAT RATE\n2,00 %\nEUR\n– 72 243,26\n0,00\n– 72 243,26\nTotal SI:\nEUR\n– 271 223,32\n0,00\n– 271 223,32\nMember State\nMeasure\nFY\nReason\nType\nCorrection %\nCurrency\nAmount\nDeductions\nFinancial Impact\nSK\nCertification\n2014\nFinancial clearance, EAFRD Non-IACS population Most Likely Error\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 697 749,56\n0,00\n– 697 749,56\nCross Compliance\n2012\nOne GAEC not defined, inadequate control of several SMRs, leniency of the sanctioning system for animal identification, CY2011\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 540 903,88\n0,00\n– 540 903,88\nCross Compliance\n2013\nOne GAEC not defined, inadequate control of several SMRs, leniency of the sanctioning system for animal identification, CY2011\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 4 718,01\n0,00\n– 4 718,01\nCross Compliance\n2014\nOne GAEC not defined, inadequate control of several SMRs, leniency of the sanctioning system for animal identification, CY2011\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n41,95\n0,00\n41,95\nCross Compliance\n2012\nOne GAEC not defined, inadequate control of several SMRs, leniency of the sanctioning system for animal identification, CY2012\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 24,22\n0,00\n– 24,22\nCross Compliance\n2013\nOne GAEC not defined, inadequate control of several SMRs, leniency of the sanctioning system for animal identification, CY2012\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 538 813,81\n0,00\n– 538 813,81\nCross Compliance\n2014\nOne GAEC not defined, inadequate control of several SMRs, leniency of the sanctioning system for animal identification, CY2012\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 1 195,01\n0,00\n– 1 195,01\nCross Compliance\n2013\nOne GAEC not defined, inadequate control of several SMRs, leniency of the sanctioning system for animal identification, CY2013\nFLAT RATE\n2,00 %\nEUR\n– 17,66\n0,00\n– 17,66\nCross Compliance\n2014\nOne GAEC not defined, inadequate control of several SMRs, leniency of the sanctioning system for animal identification, CY2013\nFLAT RATE\n2,00 %\nEUR\n– 179 779,34\n0,00\n– 179 779,34\nTotal SK:\nEUR\n– 1 963 159,54\n0,00\n– 1 963 159,54\nCurrency\nAmount\nDeductions\nFinancial Impact\nEUR\n– 71 193 175,71\n– 2 189 223,27\n– 69 003 952,44",
  "extent": "E+W+S+N.I.",
  "status": null,
  "version": "current",
  "annotations": [],
  "outstanding_effects": [],
  "provenance": {
    "source": "legislation.gov.uk",
    "source_url": "https://www.legislation.gov.uk/eudn/2016/2018/annex/division/4",
    "retrieved_at": "2026-11-01T15:13:46.649263+00:00"
  },
  "licence": "Open Government Licence v3.0",
  "licence_url": "https://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/version/3/",
  "attribution": "Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Source: legislation.gov.uk, The National Archives."
}