{
  "url": "https://openlegislation.uk/eu-decision-2016-417/annex/division-4",
  "json_url": "https://openlegislation.uk/eu-decision-2016-417/annex/division-4.json",
  "legislation": "eudn/2016/417",
  "legislation_title": "Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2016/417 of 17 March 2016 excluding from European Union financing certain expenditure incurred by the Member States under the European Agricultural Guarantee Fund (EAGF) and under the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) (notified under document C(2016) 1509) (Only the Danish, Dutch, English, Finnish, French, German, Greek, Italian, Lithuanian, Polish, Portuguese, Romanian, Spanish, Swedish texts are authentic)",
  "legislation_url": "https://openlegislation.uk/eu-decision-2016-417",
  "path": "annex/division/4",
  "kind": "division",
  "number": null,
  "heading": "Budget Item: 6711",
  "text": "Member State\nMeasure\nFY\nReason\nType\nCorrection %\nCurrency\nAmount\nDeductions\nFinancial Impact\nAT\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, non area related measures)\n2012\nScope of the on-the-spot checks\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 70 795,87\n0,00\n– 70 795,87\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, non area related measures)\n2013\nScope of the on-the-spot checks\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 142 245,32\n0,00\n– 142 245,32\nTotal AT:\nEUR\n– 213 041,19\n0,00\n– 213 041,19\nMember State\nMeasure\nFY\nReason\nType\nCorrection %\nCurrency\nAmount\nDeductions\nFinancial Impact\nDE\nCertification\n2011\nFinancial errors in the EAFRD non-IACS population\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 232 843,16\n0,00\n– 232 843,16\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 1+3 — Investment orientated measures (2007-2013)\n2013\nKnown error in the management of the measure 323-C\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 24 474,17\n0,00\n– 24 474,17\nCertification\n2013\nKnown errors resulting from the substantive testing of the IACS population\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 19 704,48\n0,00\n– 19 704,48\nCertification\n2013\nMost Likely Error (MLE) resulting from the substantive testing of the IACS population\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 268 082,29\n0,00\n– 268 082,29\nRural Development EAFRD Investment — public beneficiaries\n2013\nNo procurement procedure followed for IT tools purchase\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 2 706 123,93\n0,00\n– 2 706 123,93\nCertification\n2009\nOutstanding financial errors from previous year\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 5 069,4\n0,00\n– 5 069,4\nCertification\n2010\nOutstanding financial errors from previous year\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 4 538,21\n0,00\n– 4 538,21\nCertification\n2011\nOutstanding financial errors from previous year\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 365,82\n0,00\n– 365,82\nCertification\n2012\nOutstanding financial errors from previous year\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 560,65\n0,00\n– 560,65\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 1+3 — Investment orientated measures (2007-2013)\n2012\nPublic Procurement Procedures not properly assessed and checked\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 841 263,73\n0,00\n– 841 263,73\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 1+3 — Investment orientated measures (2007-2013)\n2013\nPublic Procurement Procedures not properly assessed and checked\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 1 543 911,96\n0,00\n– 1 543 911,96\nRural Development EAFRD Investment — public beneficiaries\n2014\nPublic Procurement Procedures not properly assessed and checked\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 1 441 912,56\n0,00\n– 1 441 912,56\nCertification\n2012\nReview of the control statistics\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 69 518,37\n0,00\n– 69 518,37\nTotal DE:\nEUR\n– 7 158 368,73\n0,00\n– 7 158 368,73\nMember State\nMeasure\nFY\nReason\nType\nCorrection %\nCurrency\nAmount\nDeductions\nFinancial Impact\nES\nCertification\n2011\nCorrection for the known error EAFRD IACS\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 2 916,99\n0,00\n– 2 916,99\nCertification\n2011\nCorrection for the known error EAFRD non IACS\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 5 013,25\n0,00\n– 5 013,25\nCertification\n2011\nCorrection for the MLE EAFRD IACS\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 20 953,46\n0,00\n– 20 953,46\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area related measures)\n2014\nPayments for the sub-measure of AE — 'Organic farming'\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 9 130,61\n0,00\n– 9 130,61\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area related measures)\n2014\nPayments to the beneficiaries before the finalisation of the OTSC (AEM)\nFLAT RATE\n2,00 %\nEUR\n– 106 066,65\n0,00\n– 106 066,65\nTotal ES:\nEUR\n– 144 080,96\n0,00\n– 144 080,96\nMember State\nMeasure\nFY\nReason\nType\nCorrection %\nCurrency\nAmount\nDeductions\nFinancial Impact\nFI\nCertification\n2011\nCorrection for failure to start recovery procedures\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 28 672,16\n– 108,34\n– 28 563,82\nTotal FI:\nEUR\n– 28 672,16\n– 108,34\n– 28 563,82\nMember State\nMeasure\nFY\nReason\nType\nCorrection %\nCurrency\nAmount\nDeductions\nFinancial Impact\nFR\nCertification\n2010\n6 yearly grass premium paid instead of 5\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 12 978,78\n0,00\n– 12 978,78\nCertification\n2010\nCorrection for the MLE on the EAFRD-non IACS population\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 1 270 251,62\n0,00\n– 1 270 251,62\nRural Development EAFRD Investment — private beneficiaries\n2010\nEligibility criteria not verified\nFLAT RATE\n2,00 %\nEUR\n– 143 933,09\n– 143 933,09\n0,00\nRural Development EAFRD Investment — private beneficiaries\n2010\nEligibility criteria not verified\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 359 832,71\n0,00\n– 359 832,71\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 1+3 — Investment orientated measures (2007-2013)\n2010\nEligibility criteria not verified\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 20 653,38\n0,00\n– 20 653,38\nRural Development EAFRD Investment — private beneficiaries\n2011\nEligibility criteria not verified\nFLAT RATE\n2,00 %\nEUR\n– 653 002,96\n– 653 002,96\n0,00\nRural Development EAFRD Investment — private beneficiaries\n2011\nEligibility criteria not verified\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 1 632 507,39\n– 9 777,9\n– 1 622 729,49\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 1+3 — Investment orientated measures (2007-2013)\n2011\nEligibility criteria not verified\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 131 070,04\n0,00\n– 131 070,04\nRural Development EAFRD Investment — private beneficiaries\n2012\nEligibility criteria not verified\nFLAT RATE\n2,00 %\nEUR\n– 714 128,24\n– 714 128,24\n0,00\nRural Development EAFRD Investment — private beneficiaries\n2012\nEligibility criteria not verified\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 1 785 320,6\n0,00\n– 1 785 320,6\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 1+3 — Investment orientated measures (2007-2013)\n2012\nEligibility criteria not verified\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 149 439,53\n0,00\n– 149 439,53\nRural Development EAFRD Investment — private beneficiaries\n2013\nEligibility criteria not verified\nFLAT RATE\n2,00 %\nEUR\n– 179 735,46\n– 179 735,46\n0,00\nRural Development EAFRD Investment — private beneficiaries\n2013\nEligibility criteria not verified\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 449 338,69\n0,00\n– 449 338,69\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 1+3 — Investment orientated measures (2007-2013)\n2013\nEligibility criteria not verified\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 44 643,36\n0,00\n– 44 643,36\nCertification\n2010\nKnown error on the EAFRD Non IACS population: VAT co-financed by the EU funds for public entities\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 813 607,17\n0,00\n– 813 607,17\nCross Compliance\n2010\nNon-definition of GAEC, inappropriate on the spot checks for SMR1 and 2 and 5, CY 2010\nFLAT RATE\n2,00 %\nEUR\n– 728 973,79\n– 87 084,56\n– 641 889,23\nCross Compliance\n2011\nNon-definition of GAEC, inappropriate on the spot checks for SMR1 and 2 and 5, CY 2010\nFLAT RATE\n2,00 %\nEUR\n– 276 681,27\n– 98 285,34\n– 178 395,93\nCross Compliance\n2012\nNon-definition of GAEC, inappropriate on the spot checks for SMR1 and 2 and 5, CY 2010\nFLAT RATE\n2,00 %\nEUR\n– 20 437,53\n0,00\n– 20 437,53\nCross Compliance\n2013\nNon-definition of GAEC, inappropriate on the spot checks for SMR1 and 2 and 5, CY 2010\nFLAT RATE\n2,00 %\nEUR\n– 667,67\n0,00\n– 667,67\nCross Compliance\n2011\nNon-definition of GAEC, inappropriate on the spot checks for SMR1 and 2 and 5, CY 2011\nFLAT RATE\n2,00 %\nEUR\n– 729 955,39\n0,00\n– 729 955,39\nCross Compliance\n2012\nNon-definition of GAEC, inappropriate on the spot checks for SMR1 and 2 and 5, CY 2011\nFLAT RATE\n2,00 %\nEUR\n– 694 669,61\n– 128 311,12\n– 566 358,49\nCross Compliance\n2013\nNon-definition of GAEC, inappropriate on the spot checks for SMR1 and 2 and 5, CY 2011\nFLAT RATE\n2,00 %\nEUR\n– 2 004,69\n0,00\n– 2 004,69\nCross Compliance\n2012\nNon-definition of GAEC, inappropriate on the spot checks for SMR1 and 2 and 5, CY 2012\nFLAT RATE\n2,00 %\nEUR\n– 445 542,8\n0,00\n– 445 542,8\nCross Compliance\n2013\nNon-definition of GAEC, inappropriate on the spot checks for SMR1 and 2 and 5, CY 2012\nFLAT RATE\n2,00 %\nEUR\n– 618 564,62\n– 95 434,72\n– 523 129,9\nRural Development EAFRD Investment — private beneficiaries\n2010\nReasonableness of costs not checked\nFLAT RATE\n2,00 %\nEUR\n– 466 051,99\n– 466 051,99\n0,00\nRural Development EAFRD Investment — private beneficiaries\n2010\nReasonableness of costs not checked\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 1 165 129,98\n– 200 489,14\n– 964 640,84\nRural Development EAFRD Investment — private beneficiaries\n2011\nReasonableness of costs not checked\nFLAT RATE\n2,00 %\nEUR\n– 1 318 962,23\n– 1 318 962,23\n0,00\nRural Development EAFRD Investment — private beneficiaries\n2011\nReasonableness of costs not checked\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 3 297 405,58\n– 67 253,62\n– 3 230 151,96\nRural Development EAFRD Investment — private beneficiaries\n2012\nReasonableness of costs not checked\nFLAT RATE\n2,00 %\nEUR\n– 1 646 751,71\n– 1 646 751,71\n0,00\nRural Development EAFRD Investment — private beneficiaries\n2012\nReasonableness of costs not checked\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 4 116 879,28\n– 62 387,68\n– 4 054 491,6\nRural Development EAFRD Investment — private beneficiaries\n2013\nReasonableness of costs not checked\nFLAT RATE\n2,00 %\nEUR\n– 346 040,61\n– 346 040,61\n0,00\nRural Development EAFRD Investment — private beneficiaries\n2013\nReasonableness of costs not checked\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 865 101,55\n– 58 386,1\n– 806 715,45\nTotal FR:\nEUR\n– 25 100 263,32\n– 6 276 016,47\n– 18 824 246,85\nMember State\nMeasure\nFY\nReason\nType\nCorrection %\nCurrency\nAmount\nDeductions\nFinancial Impact\nGB\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 4 LEADER (2007-2013)\n2012\nMeasure 413: one-off correction due to the lack of checks on the reasonableness of costs and on the availability of 3 quotations in one project\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 9 791,59\n0,00\n– 9 791,59\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 4 LEADER (2007-2013)\n2012\nMeasure 411/413: weaknesses identified in several key controls (project selection, checks on the reliability of the applicant and on double financing, OTSC)\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 116 143,13\n– 489,58\n– 115 653,55\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 4 LEADER (2007-2013)\n2013\nMeasure 411/413: weaknesses identified in several key controls (project selection, checks on the reliability of the applicant and on double financing, OTSC)\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 1 731 861,46\n0,00\n– 1 731 861,46\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 4 LEADER (2007-2013)\n2014\nMeasure 411/413: weaknesses identified in several key controls (project selection, checks on the reliability of the applicant and on double financing, OTSC)\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 748 948,33\n0,00\n– 748 948,33\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area related measures)\n2012\nMeasure 214: weakness in the administrative cross-check on livestock density\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 3 121 252,71\n0,00\n– 3 121 252,71\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area related measures)\n2013\nMeasure 214: weakness in the administrative cross-check on livestock density\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 3 258 827,27\n0,00\n– 3 258 827,27\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area related measures)\n2014\nMeasure 214: weakness in the administrative cross-check on livestock density\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 1 291 507,12\n0,00\n– 1 291 507,12\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, non area related measures)\n2012\nMeasure 216: weakness in check on double financing, on VAT registration, on in-situ visits, on cost reasonableness, delivery of the investment and on the scope of the on-the-spot checks\nFLAT RATE\n2,00 %\nEUR\n– 70 521,65\n0,00\n– 70 521,65\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, non area related measures)\n2013\nMeasure 216: weakness in check on double financing, on VAT registration, on in-situ visits, on cost reasonableness, delivery of the investment and on the scope of the on-the-spot checks\nFLAT RATE\n2,00 %\nEUR\n– 761 093,1\n0,00\n– 761 093,1\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, non area related measures)\n2014\nMeasure 216: weakness in check on double financing, on VAT registration, on in-situ visits, on cost reasonableness, delivery of the investment and on the scope of the on-the-spot checks\nFLAT RATE\n2,00 %\nEUR\n– 733 293,71\n0,00\n– 733 293,71\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, non area related measures)\n2012\nMeasure 227: weakness in checks on reliability of the applicant, on in-situ visits, on verification of the delivery of the investment and in the scope of the on-the-spot checks\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 42 403,2\n0,00\n– 42 403,2\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, non area related measures)\n2013\nMeasure 227: weakness in checks on reliability of the applicant, on in-situ visits, on verification of the delivery of the investment and in the scope of the on-the-spot checks\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 364 039,25\n0,00\n– 364 039,25\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, non area related measures)\n2014\nMeasure 227: weakness in checks on reliability of the applicant, on in-situ visits, on verification of the delivery of the investment and in the scope of the on-the-spot checks\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 366 157,36\n0,00\n– 366 157,36\nTotal GB:\nEUR\n– 12 615 839,88\n– 489,58\n– 12 615 350,3\nMember State\nMeasure\nFY\nReason\nType\nCorrection %\nCurrency\nAmount\nDeductions\nFinancial Impact\nGR\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 1+3 — Investment orientated measures (2007-2013)\n2010\nInappropriate application of selection criteria\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 506 480,19\n0,00\n– 506 480,19\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 1+3 — Investment orientated measures (2007-2013)\n2011\nInappropriate application of selection criteria\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 699 174,68\n0,00\n– 699 174,68\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 1+3 — Investment orientated measures (2007-2013)\n2012\nInappropriate application of selection criteria\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 1 002 840,61\n0,00\n– 1 002 840,61\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 1+3 — Investment orientated measures (2007-2013)\n2013\nInappropriate application of selection criteria\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 899 008,7\n0,00\n– 899 008,7\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 1+3 — Investment orientated measures (2007-2013)\n2011\nSanction policy is not effective, proportionate and dissuasive\nONE OFF\n0,00 %\nEUR\n– 536 620,15\n0,00\n– 536 620,15\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 1+3 — Investment orientated measures (2007-2013)\n2012\nSanction policy is not effective, proportionate and dissuasive\nONE OFF\n0,00 %\nEUR\n– 100 072,61\n0,00\n– 100 072,61\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 1+3 — Investment orientated measures (2007-2013)\n2013\nSanction policy is not effective, proportionate and dissuasive\nONE OFF\n0,00 %\nEUR\n– 136 263,56\n0,00\n– 136 263,56\nTotal GR:\nEUR\n– 3 880 460,5\n0,00\n– 3 880 460,5\nMember State\nMeasure\nFY\nReason\nType\nCorrection %\nCurrency\nAmount\nDeductions\nFinancial Impact\nIT\nCross Compliance\n2010\nApplication of a tolerance, farmers with animals, CY2009\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 78 405,91\n0,00\n– 78 405,91\nCross Compliance\n2011\nApplication of a tolerance, farmers with animals, CY2010\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 38 637,69\n0,00\n– 38 637,69\nCross Compliance\n2009\nApplication of a tolerance, weaknesses in report of eligibility checks and veterinarian checks, farmers with animals, CY2008\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 143 572,52\n0,00\n– 143 572,52\nCross Compliance\n2010\nApplication of a tolerance, weaknesses in report of eligibility checks and veterinarian checks, farmers with animals, CY2009\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 100 094,63\n0,00\n– 100 094,63\nCross Compliance\n2011\nApplication of a tolerance, weaknesses in report of eligibility checks and veterinarian checks, farmers with animals, CY2010\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 134 296,47\n– 3 255,87\n– 131 040,6\nCross Compliance\n2010\nApplication of a tolerance, weaknesses in report of eligibility checks, farmers with animals, CY2009\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 42 005,1\n0,00\n– 42 005,1\nCross Compliance\n2011\nApplication of a tolerance, weaknesses in report of eligibility checks, farmers with animals, CY2010\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 43 429,85\n0,00\n– 43 429,85\nCross Compliance\n2009\nPrevious corrections CY2008\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n0,00\n– 13 570,69\n13 570,69\nCross Compliance\n2010\nPrevious corrections CY2009\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n0,00\n– 12 124,12\n12 124,12\nCross Compliance\n2009\nWeaknesses in report of eligibility checks and veterinarian checks, farmers with animals, CY2008\nFLAT RATE\n2,00 %\nEUR\n– 19 365,24\n0,00\n– 19 365,24\nCross Compliance\n2010\nWeaknesses in report of eligibility checks and veterinarian checks, farmers with animals, CY2009\nFLAT RATE\n2,00 %\nEUR\n– 23 218,8\n0,00\n– 23 218,8\nCross Compliance\n2009\nWeaknesses in report of eligibility checks, farmers without animals, CY2008\nFLAT RATE\n2,00 %\nEUR\n– 90 181,34\n0,00\n– 90 181,34\nCross Compliance\n2010\nWeaknesses in report of eligibility checks, farmers without animals, CY2009\nFLAT RATE\n2,00 %\nEUR\n– 96 173,02\n0,00\n– 96 173,02\nCross Compliance\n2011\nWeaknesses in report of eligibility checks, farmers without animals, CY2010\nFLAT RATE\n2,00 %\nEUR\n– 104 882,23\n0,00\n– 104 882,23\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area related measures)\n2011\nWeaknesses on the on-the-spot controls — Measure 211\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n540,56\n0,00\n540,56\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area related measures)\n2012\nWeaknesses on the on-the-spot controls — Measure 211\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 248 449,43\n0,00\n– 248 449,43\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area related measures)\n2013\nWeaknesses on the on-the-spot controls — Measure 211\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 215 733,48\n0,00\n– 215 733,48\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area related measures)\n2014\nWeaknesses on the on-the-spot controls — Measure 211\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 175 805,33\n0,00\n– 175 805,33\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area related measures)\n2011\nWeaknesses on the on-the-spot controls — Measure 214\nFLAT RATE\n2,00 %\nEUR\n193,13\n0,00\n193,13\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area related measures)\n2012\nWeaknesses on the on-the-spot controls — Measure 214\nFLAT RATE\n2,00 %\nEUR\n– 341 406,39\n0,00\n– 341 406,39\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area related measures)\n2013\nWeaknesses on the on-the-spot controls — Measure 214\nFLAT RATE\n2,00 %\nEUR\n– 416 214,54\n0,00\n– 416 214,54\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area related measures)\n2014\nWeaknesses on the on-the-spot controls — Measure 214\nFLAT RATE\n2,00 %\nEUR\n– 454 241,45\n0,00\n– 454 241,45\nTotal IT:\nEUR\n– 2 765 379,73\n– 28 950,68\n– 2 736 429,05\nMember State\nMeasure\nFY\nReason\nType\nCorrection %\nCurrency\nAmount\nDeductions\nFinancial Impact\nLT\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area related measures)\n2009\nWeaknesses in the on-the-spot controls — Measure 214\nFLAT RATE\n2,00 %\nEUR\n– 84 153,64\n0,00\n– 84 153,64\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area related measures)\n2010\nWeaknesses in the on-the-spot controls — Measure 214\nFLAT RATE\n2,00 %\nEUR\n– 144 593,73\n0,00\n– 144 593,73\nTotal LT:\nEUR\n– 228 747,37\n0,00\n– 228 747,37\nMember State\nMeasure\nFY\nReason\nType\nCorrection %\nCurrency\nAmount\nDeductions\nFinancial Impact\nPL\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 1 — Measures with flat rate support\n2010\nWeaknesses in early retirement scheme payments\nFLAT RATE\n2,00 %\nEUR\n– 234 331,35\n0,00\n– 234 331,35\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 1 — Measures with flat rate support\n2010\nWeaknesses in early retirement scheme payments\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 3 515 081,52\n0,00\n– 3 515 081,52\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 1 — Measures with flat rate support\n2011\nWeaknesses in early retirement scheme payments\nFLAT RATE\n2,00 %\nEUR\n– 675 353,06\n0,00\n– 675 353,06\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 1 — Measures with flat rate support\n2011\nWeaknesses in early retirement scheme payments\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 10 229 852,44\n0,00\n– 10 229 852,44\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 1 — Measures with flat rate support\n2012\nWeaknesses in early retirement scheme payments\nFLAT RATE\n2,00 %\nEUR\n– 717 693,11\n0,00\n– 717 693,11\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 1 — Measures with flat rate support\n2012\nWeaknesses in early retirement scheme payments\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 10 110 275,83\n0,00\n– 10 110 275,83\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 1 — Measures with flat rate support\n2013\nWeaknesses in early retirement scheme payments\nFLAT RATE\n2,00 %\nEUR\n– 758 347,29\n0,00\n– 758 347,29\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 1 — Measures with flat rate support\n2013\nWeaknesses in early retirement scheme payments\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 11 230 876,11\n0,00\n– 11 230 876,11\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 1 — Measures with flat rate support\n2011\nWeaknesses in the semi-subsistence farming scheme\nFLAT RATE\n10,00 %\nEUR\n– 3 614 511,65\n0,00\n– 3 614 511,65\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 1 — Measures with flat rate support\n2011\nWeaknesses in the semi-subsistence farming scheme\nONE OFF\n11,00 %\nEUR\n– 4 467 373,95\n0,00\n– 4 467 373,95\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 1 — Measures with flat rate support\n2012\nWeaknesses in the semi-subsistence farming scheme\nFLAT RATE\n10,00 %\nEUR\n– 619,90\n0,00\n– 619,90\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 1 — Measures with flat rate support\n2012\nWeaknesses in the semi-subsistence farming scheme\nONE OFF\n11,00 %\nEUR\n– 766,17\n0,00\n– 766,17\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 1 — Measures with flat rate support\n2013\nWeaknesses in the semi-subsistence farming scheme\nFLAT RATE\n10,00 %\nEUR\n7 909,14\n0,00\n7 909,14\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 1 — Measures with flat rate support\n2013\nWeaknesses in the semi-subsistence farming scheme\nONE OFF\n11,00 %\nEUR\n9 775,34\n0,00\n9 775,34\nRural Development EAFRD Investment — private beneficiaries\n2011\nWeaknesses in verification of cost reasonableness; SME criterion verification and scope of on the spot checks\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 2 046 731,11\n0,00\n– 2 046 731,11\nRural Development EAFRD Investment — private beneficiaries\n2012\nWeaknesses in verification of cost reasonableness; SME criterion verification and scope of on the spot checks\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 5 369 057,29\n0,00\n– 5 369 057,29\nRural Development EAFRD Investment — private beneficiaries\n2013\nWeaknesses in verification of cost reasonableness; SME criterion verification and scope of on the spot checks\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 3 857 372,46\n0,00\n– 3 857 372,46\nRural Development EAFRD Investment — private beneficiaries\n2014\nWeaknesses in verification of cost reasonableness; SME criterion verification and scope of on the spot checks\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 437 316,75\n0,00\n– 437 316,75\nTotal PL:\nEUR\n– 57 247 875,51\n0,00\n– 57 247 875,51\nMember State\nMeasure\nFY\nReason\nType\nCorrection %\nCurrency\nAmount\nDeductions\nFinancial Impact\nPT\nCertification\n2009\nknown error EAFRD IACS population\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 74 565,74\n– 5 457,44\n– 69 108,3\nCertification\n2009\nknown error EAFRD non-IACS population\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 487,20\n– 11,93\n– 475,27\nTotal PT:\nEUR\n– 75 052,94\n– 5 469,37\n– 69 583,57\nMember State\nMeasure\nFY\nReason\nType\nCorrection %\nCurrency\nAmount\nDeductions\nFinancial Impact\nRO\nRural Development EAFRD Investment — public beneficiaries\n2010\nInsufficient checks on the public procurement procedure\nFLAT RATE\n10,00 %\nEUR\n– 3 837 667,96\n0,00\n– 3 837 667,96\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 1+3 — Investment orientated measures (2007-2013)\n2011\nInsufficient checks on the public procurement procedure\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 362 166,32\n0,00\n– 362 166,32\nRural Development EAFRD Investment — public beneficiaries\n2011\nInsufficient checks on the public procurement procedure\nFLAT RATE\n10,00 %\nEUR\n– 30 088 395,7\n0,00\n– 30 088 395,7\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 1+3 — Investment orientated measures (2007-2013)\n2012\nInsufficient checks on the public procurement procedure\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 4 835 357,49\n0,00\n– 4 835 357,49\nRural Development EAFRD Investment — public beneficiaries\n2012\nInsufficient checks on the public procurement procedure\nFLAT RATE\n10,00 %\nEUR\n– 26 711 026,12\n0,00\n– 26 711 026,12\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 1+3 — Investment orientated measures (2007-2013)\n2013\nInsufficient checks on the public procurement procedure\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 15 638 250,66\n0,00\n– 15 638 250,66\nRural Development EAFRD Investment — public beneficiaries\n2010\nNo penalties applied when end-of-works dates are exceeded\nEXTRAPOLATED\n2,44 %\nEUR\n– 959 810,35\n0,00\n– 959 810,35\nRural Development EAFRD Investment — public beneficiaries\n2011\nNo penalties applied when end-of-works dates are exceeded\nEXTRAPOLATED\n2,44 %\nEUR\n– 7 525 183,01\n0,00\n– 7 525 183,01\nRural Development EAFRD Investment — public beneficiaries\n2012\nNo penalties applied when end-of-works dates are exceeded\nEXTRAPOLATED\n2,44 %\nEUR\n– 8 104 689,34\n0,00\n– 8 104 689,34\nRural Development EAFRD Investment — public beneficiaries\n2013\nNo penalties applied when end-of-works dates are exceeded\nEXTRAPOLATED\n2,44 %\nEUR\n– 5 405 977,31\n0,00\n– 5 405 977,31\nCertification\n2011\nLate initiation of recovery procedures under EAFRD\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 7 084,36\n0,00\n– 7 084,36\nTotal RO:\nEUR\n– 103 475 608,62\n0,00\n– 103 475 608,62\nCurrency\nAmount\nDeductions\nFinancial Impact\nEUR\n– 212 933 390,91\n– 6 311 034,44\n– 206 622 356,47",
  "extent": "E+W+S+N.I.",
  "status": null,
  "version": "current",
  "annotations": [],
  "outstanding_effects": [],
  "provenance": {
    "source": "legislation.gov.uk",
    "source_url": "https://www.legislation.gov.uk/eudn/2016/417/annex/division/4",
    "retrieved_at": "2026-11-01T15:14:01.521464+00:00"
  },
  "licence": "Open Government Licence v3.0",
  "licence_url": "https://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/version/3/",
  "attribution": "Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Source: legislation.gov.uk, The National Archives."
}