{
  "url": "https://openlegislation.uk/eu-decision-2017-1144/annex/division-4",
  "json_url": "https://openlegislation.uk/eu-decision-2017-1144/annex/division-4.json",
  "legislation": "eudn/2017/1144",
  "legislation_title": "Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2017/1144 of 26 June 2017 excluding from European Union financing certain expenditure incurred by the Member States under the European Agricultural Guarantee Fund (EAGF) and under the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) (notified under document C(2017) 4136) (Only the Bulgarian, Danish, Dutch, English, French, German, Greek, Italian, Lithuanian, Maltese, Polish, Portuguese, Romanian, Slovak and Spanish texts are authentic)",
  "legislation_url": "https://openlegislation.uk/eu-decision-2017-1144",
  "path": "annex/division/4",
  "kind": "division",
  "number": null,
  "heading": "Budget Item: 6711",
  "text": "Member State\nMeasure\nFY\nReason\nType\nCorrection %\nCurrency\nAmount\nDeductions\nFinancial Impact\nAT\nRural Development EAFRD (2014-2020) measures subject to IACS\n2015\nmeasure 214: implementation of an appropriate sanction system\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 5 958,97\n0,00\n– 5 958,97\nRural Development EAFRD (2014-2020) measures subject to IACS\n2015\nmeasure 214 ‘Organic Farming’ — Adequate supervision procedure\nEXTRAPOLATED\n0,21 %\nEUR\n– 101 920,89\n0,00\n– 101 920,89\nTotal AT:\nEUR\n– 107 879,86\n0,00\n– 107 879,86\nMember State\nMeasure\nFY\nReason\nType\nCorrection %\nCurrency\nAmount\nDeductions\nFinancial Impact\nBG\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 1+3 — Investment orientated measures (2007-2013)\n2010\n5 % flat rate correction for deficiencies in OTSC, verification of public procurement, the reasonableness of costs and ineligible expenditure\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 2 793 872,47\n– 2 793 872,47\n0,00\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 1+3 — Investment orientated measures (2007-2013)\n2011\n5 % flat rate correction for deficiencies in OTSC, verification of public procurement, the reasonableness of costs and ineligible expenditure\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 1 074 263,6\n– 1 074 263,6\n0,00\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 1+3 — Investment orientated measures (2007-2013)\n2012\n5 % flat rate correction for deficiencies in OTSC, verification of public procurement, the reasonableness of costs and ineligible expenditure\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 780 941,24\n– 780 941,24\n0,00\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 1+3 — Investment orientated measures (2007-2013)\n2013\n5 % flat rate correction for deficiencies in OTSC, verification of public procurement, the reasonableness of costs and ineligible expenditure\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 1 637 751,75\n0,00\n– 1 637 751,75\nRural Development EAFRD Investment — public beneficiaries\n2014\n5 % flat rate correction for deficiencies in OTSC, verification of public procurement, the reasonableness of costs and ineligible expenditure\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 1 690 283,33\n0,00\n– 1 690 283,33\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 1+3 — Investment orientated measures (2007-2013)\n2010\nAdjustment due to national authorities withdrawing previous corrected amounts\nONE OFF\nEUR\n259 643,71\n0,00\n259 643,71\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 1+3 — Investment orientated measures (2007-2013)\n2011\nAdjustment due to national authorities withdrawing previous corrected amounts\nONE OFF\nEUR\n107 839,98\n0,00\n107 839,98\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 1+3 — Investment orientated measures (2007-2013)\n2012\nAdjustment due to national authorities withdrawing previous corrected amounts\nONE OFF\nEUR\n51 063,74\n0,00\n51 063,74\nCross Compliance\n2013\nDeficiencies in the scope, extent and quality of OTSC and reporting for SMR7 and 8, application of tolerances, CY2012\nFLAT RATE\n3,00 %\nEUR\n– 27 147,64\n0,00\n– 27 147,64\nCross Compliance\n2014\nDeficiencies in the scope, extent and quality of OTSC and reporting for SMR7 and 8, application of tolerances, CY2013\nFLAT RATE\n6,00 %\nEUR\n– 105 957,72\n0,00\n– 105 957,72\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 1+3 — Investment orientated measures (2007-2013)\n2010\nExtrapolated 9 % correction-weaknesses concerning the reasonableness of costs and ineligible expenditure\nEXTRAPOLATED\n9,00 %\nEUR\n– 4 183 858,87\n– 418 385,89\n– 3 765 472,98\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 1+3 — Investment orientated measures (2007-2013)\n2011\nExtrapolated 9 % correction-weaknesses concerning the reasonableness of costs and ineligible expenditure\nEXTRAPOLATED\n9,00 %\nEUR\n– 896 213,65\n– 89 621,36\n– 806 592,29\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 1+3 — Investment orientated measures (2007-2013)\n2012\nExtrapolated 9 % correction-weaknesses concerning the reasonableness of costs and ineligible expenditure\nEXTRAPOLATED\n9,00 %\nEUR\n– 556 147,52\n– 55 614,76\n– 500 532,76\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 1+3 — Investment orientated measures (2007-2013)\n2013\nExtrapolated 9 % correction-weaknesses concerning the reasonableness of costs and ineligible expenditure\nEXTRAPOLATED\n9,00 %\nEUR\n– 2 893 246,02\n0,00\n– 2 893 246,02\nCross Compliance\n2015\nFailure to achieve the mandatory control rate for SMR7 and 8, weakness in the increase of the control rate, CY2014\nFLAT RATE\n10,00 %\nEUR\n– 350 314,96\n0,00\n– 350 314,96\nTotal BG:\nEUR\n– 16 571 451,34\n– 5 212 699,32\n– 11 358 752,02\nMember State\nMeasure\nFY\nReason\nType\nCorrection %\nCurrency\nAmount\nDeductions\nFinancial Impact\nDE\nRural Development EAFRD Investment — public beneficiaries\n2014\nFinancial errors in public procurements audited\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 351 787,61\n– 349 181,08\n– 2 606,53\nRural Development EAFRD (2014-2020) Investment — public beneficiaries\n2015\nFinancial errors in public procurements audited\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 159 761,9\n0,00\n– 159 761,9\nCertification\n2015\nFinancial errors in the EAFRD population\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 511 727,53\n0,00\n– 511 727,53\nTotal DE:\nEUR\n– 1 023 277,04\n– 349 181,08\n– 674 095,96\nMember State\nMeasure\nFY\nReason\nType\nCorrection %\nCurrency\nAmount\nDeductions\nFinancial Impact\nES\nCross Compliance\n2013\nDeficiencies in the scope and quality of OTSC — Deficient reporting of OTSC — Late performance of OTSC — Deficient risk analysis — Pillar II — CY 2013\nFLAT RATE\n2,00 %\nEUR\n2,40\n0,00\n2,40\nCross Compliance\n2014\nDeficiencies in the scope and quality of OTSC — Deficient reporting of OTSC — Late performance of OTSC — Deficient risk analysis — Pillar II — CY 2013\nFLAT RATE\n2,00 %\nEUR\n– 2 272,97\n0,00\n– 2 272,97\nCross Compliance\n2014\nDeficiencies in the scope and quality of OTSC — Deficient reporting of OTSC — Late performance of OTSC — Pillar II — CY 2014\nFLAT RATE\n2,00 %\nEUR\n1,06\n0,00\n1,06\nCross Compliance\n2015\nDeficiencies in the scope and quality of OTSC — Deficient reporting of OTSC — Late performance of OTSC — Pillar II — CY 2014\nFLAT RATE\n2,00 %\nEUR\n– 2 493,06\n0,00\n– 2 493,06\nCross Compliance\n2013\nDeficiencies in the scope and quality of OTSC — Late performance of OTSC — Deficient sampling of parcels for OTSC — Deficient risk analysis — Pillar II — CY 2012\nFLAT RATE\n2,00 %\nEUR\n– 180,81\n0,00\n– 180,81\nCertification\n2013\nMaterial error in EAFRD accounts\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 903 456,8\n– 17 985,15\n– 885 471,65\nTotal ES:\nEUR\n– 908 400,18\n– 17 985,15\n– 890 415,03\nMember State\nMeasure\nFY\nReason\nType\nCorrection %\nCurrency\nAmount\nDeductions\nFinancial Impact\nFR\nRural Development EAFRD Investment — private beneficiaries\n2014\nDeficiencies in the verification of the reasonableness of the costs and of the payment claims Measures 121 and 123\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 4 980 641,31\n– 41 685,4\n– 4 938 955,91\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 1+3 — Investment orientated measures (2007-2013)\n2013\nDeficiencies in the verification of the reasonableness of the costs and of the payment claims Measures 121 and 123\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 396 917,7\n0,00\n– 396 917,7\nRural Development EAFRD (2014-2020) Investment — private beneficiaries\n2015\nDeficiencies in the verification of the reasonableness of the costs and of the payment claims of Measures 121 and 123\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 4 482 936,52\n0,00\n– 4 482 936,52\nRural Development EAFRD (2014-2020) Investment — private beneficiaries\n2016\nDeficiencies in the verification of the reasonableness of the costs and of the payment claims of Measures 121 and 123\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 1 595 408,44\n0,00\n– 1 595 408,44\nRural Development EAFRD (2014-2020) Investment — private beneficiaries\n2015\nDeficiency in the verification of reasonableness of the costs: correction with recurrence for Measures 121C4 and 123A\nFLAT RATE\n10,00 %\nEUR\n– 3 184 129,2\n– 1 592 064,61\n– 1 592 064,59\nRural Development EAFRD (2014-2020) Investment — private beneficiaries\n2016\nDeficiency in the verification of reasonableness of the costs: correction with recurrence for Measures 121C4 and 123A\nFLAT RATE\n10,00 %\nEUR\n– 1 279 291,51\n– 639 645,75\n– 639 645,76\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 1+3 — Investment orientated measures (2007-2013)\n2013\nDeficiency in the verification of reasonableness of the costs: correction with recurrence for Measures 121C4 and 123A\nFLAT RATE\n10,00 %\nEUR\n– 344 907,12\n– 171 577,47\n– 173 329,65\nRural Development EAFRD Investment — private beneficiaries\n2014\nDeficiency in the verification of reasonableness of the costs: correction with recurrence for Measures 121C4 and 123A\nFLAT RATE\n10,00 %\nEUR\n– 2 802 935,54\n– 1 404 390,37\n– 1 398 545,17\nRural Development EAFRD Investment — public beneficiaries\n2014\nExclusion of ineligible expenditure M321\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 68 062,01\n0,00\n– 68 062,01\nCertification\n2012\nmanagement weaknesses\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 16 845 764,04\n0,00\n– 16 845 764,04\nCertification\n2013\nmanagement weaknesses in the FY2013\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 10 359 335,4\n0,00\n– 10 359 335,4\nTotal FR:\nEUR\n– 46 340 328,79\n– 3 849 363,6\n– 42 490 965,19\nMember State\nMeasure\nFY\nReason\nType\nCorrection %\nCurrency\nAmount\nDeductions\nFinancial Impact\nGB\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area related measures)\n2014\nmeasure 214 — FY2014: weaknesses in the control system for livestock density (both administrative and on the spot)\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 538 979,08\n0,00\n– 538 979,08\nRural Development EAFRD (2014-2020) measures subject to IACS\n2015\nmeasure 214 — FY2015: weaknesses in the control system for livestock density (both administrative and on the spot)\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 543 702,51\n0,00\n– 543 702,51\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area related measures)\n2014\nmeasure 221 — FY2014: weaknesses in the check of eligibility criteria\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 12 204,0\n0,00\n– 12 204,0\nRural Development EAFRD (2014-2020) forestry measures\n2015\nmeasure 221 — FY2015: weaknesses in the check of eligibility criteria\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 12 204,0\n0,00\n– 12 204,0\nRural Development EAFRD LEADER\n2014\nOne deficient key control and one absent ancillary control\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 602 585,37\n0,00\n– 602 585,37\nRural Development EAFRD LEADER\n2015\nOne deficient key control and one absent ancillary control\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n4 026,71\n0,00\n4 026,71\nRural Development EAFRD LEADER\n2016\nOne deficient key control and one absent ancillary control\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n368,09\n0,00\n368,09\nTotal GB:\nEUR\n– 1 705 280,16\n0,00\n– 1 705 280,16\nMember State\nMeasure\nFY\nReason\nType\nCorrection %\nCurrency\nAmount\nDeductions\nFinancial Impact\nGR\nCross Compliance\n2013\nWeakness in risk analysis, MRFPP and SMR1, CY2012\nFLAT RATE\n2,00 %\nEUR\n– 229 711,85\n0,00\n– 229 711,85\nCross Compliance\n2014\nWeakness in risk analysis, MRFPP and SMR1, CY2012\nFLAT RATE\n2,00 %\nEUR\n– 57 428,76\n0,00\n– 57 428,76\nTotal GR:\nEUR\n– 287 140,61\n0,00\n– 287 140,61\nMember State\nMeasure\nFY\nReason\nType\nCorrection %\nCurrency\nAmount\nDeductions\nFinancial Impact\nIT\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 1+3 — Investment orientated measures (2007-2013)\n2013\nDeficiencies in key control: ‘Appropriate evaluation of the reasonableness of costs using a suitable evaluation system’related to the General costs\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 26 409,49\n0,00\n– 26 409,49\nRural Development EAFRD Investment — private beneficiaries\n2014\nDeficiencies in key control: ‘Appropriate evaluation of the reasonableness of costs using a suitable evaluation system’related to the General costs\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 45 475,98\n0,00\n– 45 475,98\nRural Development EAFRD (2014-2020) Risk management\n2015\nDeficiencies in key control: ‘Appropriate evaluation of the reasonableness of costs using a suitable evaluation system’related to the General costs\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 133 118,88\n0,00\n– 133 118,88\nCross Compliance\n2013\nLeniency of the sanctioning system in animal area, CY2012\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 7 112,87\n0,00\n– 7 112,87\nCross Compliance\n2015\nLimited access to veterinarian control reports, CY2014\nFLAT RATE\n2,00 %\nEUR\n– 175 426,91\n0,00\n– 175 426,91\nCross Compliance\n2014\nNo check for one GAEC and partial check of two SMRs, Farmer without animals, CY2013\nFLAT RATE\n2,00 %\nEUR\n– 39 153,87\n0,00\n– 39 153,87\nCross Compliance\n2014\nPartial control of two requirements, use of sectoral check without require assurance, farmers with animals, CY2013\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 61 526,63\n0,00\n– 61 526,63\nCross Compliance\n2015\nPartial control of two requirements, use of sectoral check without require assurance, farmers with animals, CY2014\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 78 725,47\n0,00\n– 78 725,47\nCross Compliance\n2013\nSMR1 and 5 not controlled outside Natura2000 area, weakness in checks for SMR7 and SMR16, limited access to veterinarian control reports, CY2012\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 280 745,26\n– 41,98\n– 280 703,28\nCross Compliance\n2014\nSMR1 and 5 not controlled outside Natura2000 area, weakness in checks for SMR7 and SMR16, limited access to veterinarian control reports, CY2012\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 97 287,65\n0,00\n– 97 287,65\nCross Compliance\n2015\nSMR1 and 5 not controlled outside Natura2000 area, weakness in checks for SMR7 and SMR16, limited access to veterinarian control reports, CY2012\nFLAT RATE\n2,00 %\nEUR\n– 13 600,21\n0,00\n– 13 600,21\nCross Compliance\n2014\nSMR1 and 5 not controlled outside Natura2000 area, weakness in checks for SMR7 and SMR16, limited access to veterinarian control reports, CY2013\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 203 367,8\n0,00\n– 203 367,8\nCross Compliance\n2015\nSMR1 and 5 not controlled outside Natura2000 area, weakness in checks for SMR7 and SMR16, limited access to veterinarian control reports, CY2013\nFLAT RATE\n2,00 %\nEUR\n– 27 839,23\n0,00\n– 27 839,23\nRural Development EAFRD (2014-2020) measures subject to IACS\n2015\nTwo agri-environmental sub-measures(214):\nInappropriate follow-up of the results of cross-checks in all appropriate cases with data from the IACS.\nFLAT RATE\n3,00 %\nEUR\n– 148 200,0\n0,00\n– 148 200,0\nTotal IT:\nEUR\n– 1 337 990,25\n– 41,98\n– 1 337 948,27\nMember State\nMeasure\nFY\nReason\nType\nCorrection %\nCurrency\nAmount\nDeductions\nFinancial Impact\nLT\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 4 LEADER (2007-2013)\n2013\nDeficiencies in key controls: 1) Quality of on-the-spot checks; 2) Evaluation of reasonableness of costs at application stage; 3) Eligibility of costs of the operation (in-kind contributions)\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 1 288 795,9\n0,00\n– 1 288 795,9\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 4 LEADER (2007-2013)\n2014\nDeficiencies in key controls: 1) Quality of on-the-spot checks; 2) Evaluation of reasonableness of costs at application stage; 3) Eligibility of costs of the operation (in-kind contributions)\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 1 530 512,9\n0,00\n– 1 530 512,9\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 4 LEADER (2007-2013)\n2015\nDeficiencies in key controls: 1) Quality of on-the-spot checks; 2) Evaluation of reasonableness of costs at application stage; 3) Eligibility of costs of the operation (in-kind contributions)\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 926 149,21\n0,00\n– 926 149,21\nRural Development EAFRD LEADER\n2016\nDeficiencies in key controls: 1) Quality of on-the-spot checks 2) Evaluation of reasonableness of costs at application stage 3) Eligibility of costs of the operation (in-kind contributions). Correction period: 16.10.2015-31.12.2015.\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 462 436,92\n0,00\n– 462 436,92\nTotal LT:\nEUR\n– 4 207 894,93\n0,00\n– 4 207 894,93\nMember State\nMeasure\nFY\nReason\nType\nCorrection %\nCurrency\nAmount\nDeductions\nFinancial Impact\nLU\nClearance of accounts — Conformity Clearance\n2010\nNon respect of the eligibility criteria\nONE OFF\n0,00 %\nEUR\n– 1 469 939,0\n0,00\n– 1 469 939,0\nTotal LU:\nEUR\n– 1 469 939,0\n0,00\n– 1 469 939,0\nMember State\nMeasure\nFY\nReason\nType\nCorrection %\nCurrency\nAmount\nDeductions\nFinancial Impact\nMT\nCertification\n2015\nClearance of accounts FY2015\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 131 903,31\n0,00\n– 131 903,31\nTotal MT:\nEUR\n– 131 903,31\n0,00\n– 131 903,31\nMember State\nMeasure\nFY\nReason\nType\nCorrection %\nCurrency\nAmount\nDeductions\nFinancial Impact\nNL\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 4 LEADER (2007-2013)\n2014\ndeficiencies in key and ancillary controls\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 217 083,5\n0,00\n– 217 083,5\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 4 LEADER (2007-2013)\n2014\ndeficiencies in key and ancillary controls\nFLAT RATE\n7,00 %\nEUR\n– 89 804,68\n0,00\n– 89 804,68\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 4 LEADER (2007-2013)\n2015\ndeficiencies in key and ancillary controls\nFLAT RATE\n7,00 %\nEUR\n– 314 873,64\n0,00\n– 314 873,64\nRural Development EAFRD LEADER\n2016\ndeficiencies in key and ancillary controls\nFLAT RATE\n7,00 %\nEUR\n– 216 895,65\n0,00\n– 216 895,65\nTotal NL:\nEUR\n– 838 657,47\n0,00\n– 838 657,47\nMember State\nMeasure\nFY\nReason\nType\nCorrection %\nCurrency\nAmount\nDeductions\nFinancial Impact\nRO\nRural Development EAFRD Investment — private beneficiaries\n2015\nControls on artificial conditions\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 949 386,13\n0,00\n– 949 386,13\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 1+3 — Investment orientated measures (2007-2013)\n2013\nEligibility of the beneficiary — skills verification and Controls on artificial conditions\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 2 661 268,1\n0,00\n– 2 661 268,1\nRural Development EAFRD Investment — private beneficiaries\n2014\nEligibility of the beneficiary — skills verification and Controls on artificial conditions\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 648 249,31\n0,00\n– 648 249,31\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 1+3 — Investment orientated measures (2007-2013)\n2012\nEligibility of the costs — respect of ceilings/aid intensity\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 1 478 707,1\n– 73 935,36\n– 1 404 771,74\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 1+3 — Investment orientated measures (2007-2013)\n2013\nEligibility of the costs — respect of ceilings/aid intensity\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 1 335 193,08\n0,00\n– 1 335 193,08\nRural Development EAFRD Investment — private beneficiaries\n2014\nEligibility of the costs — respect of ceilings/aid intensity\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 1 041 006,91\n0,00\n– 1 041 006,91\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area related measures)\n2010\nExecution of overlapping amount\nONE OFF\nEUR\n0,00\n5 907,74\n– 5 907,74\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area related measures)\n2011\nExecution of overlapping amount\nFLAT RATE\n2,00 %\nEUR\n0,00\n2 731 143,6\n– 2 731 143,6\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area related measures)\n2011\nExecution of overlapping amount\nONE OFF\nEUR\n0,00\n53 937,77\n– 53 937,77\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area related measures)\n2012\nExecution of overlapping amount\nONE OFF\nEUR\n0,00\n15 400,0\n– 15 400,0\nCertification\n2012\nMLE for the EAFRD IACS population\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 4 212 281,45\n– 83 053,09\n– 4 129 228,36\nCertification\n2012\nMLE for the EAFRD Non IACS population\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 8 565 856,43\n– 852 487,19\n– 7 713 369,24\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 1+3 — Investment orientated measures (2007-2013)\n2013\nProcurement- reasonableness of the costs check weaknesses\nFLAT RATE\n2,00 %\nEUR\n– 508 630,52\n0,00\n– 508 630,52\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 1+3 — Investment orientated measures (2007-2013)\n2013\nProcurement- reasonableness of the costs check weaknesses\nFLAT RATE\n10,00 %\nEUR\n– 1 533 681,75\n0,00\n– 1 533 681,75\nRural Development EAFRD Investment — private beneficiaries\n2014\nProcurement- reasonableness of the costs check weaknesses\nFLAT RATE\n2,00 %\nEUR\n– 220 258,09\n0,00\n– 220 258,09\nRural Development EAFRD Investment — private beneficiaries\n2014\nProcurement- reasonableness of the costs check weaknesses\nFLAT RATE\n10,00 %\nEUR\n– 511 227,25\n0,00\n– 511 227,25\nTotal RO:\nEUR\n– 23 665 746,12\n1 796 913,47\n– 25 462 659,59\nMember State\nMeasure\nFY\nReason\nType\nCorrection %\nCurrency\nAmount\nDeductions\nFinancial Impact\nSK\nCertification\n2015\nKnown error in the EAFRD Non-IACS population\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 204 053,34\n0,00\n– 204 053,34\nTotal SK:\nEUR\n– 204 053,34\n0,00\n– 204 053,34\nCurrency\nAmount\nDeductions\nFinancial Impact\nEUR\n– 98 799 942,4\n– 7 632 357,66\n– 91 167 584,74",
  "extent": "E+W+S+N.I.",
  "status": null,
  "version": "current",
  "annotations": [],
  "outstanding_effects": [],
  "provenance": {
    "source": "legislation.gov.uk",
    "source_url": "https://www.legislation.gov.uk/eudn/2017/1144/annex/division/4",
    "retrieved_at": "2026-11-01T15:13:27.059736+00:00"
  },
  "licence": "Open Government Licence v3.0",
  "licence_url": "https://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/version/3/",
  "attribution": "Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Source: legislation.gov.uk, The National Archives."
}