{
  "url": "https://openlegislation.uk/eu-decision-2018-1841/annex/division-4",
  "json_url": "https://openlegislation.uk/eu-decision-2018-1841/annex/division-4.json",
  "legislation": "eudn/2018/1841",
  "legislation_title": "Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2018/1841 of 16 November 2018 excluding from European Union financing certain expenditure incurred by the Member States under the European Agricultural Guarantee Fund (EAGF) and under the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) (notified under document C(2018) 7424) (Only the Croatian, Czech, Dutch, English, French, German, Greek, Hungarian, Italian, Polish, Portuguese, Romanian, Slovak, Spanish and Swedish texts are authentic)",
  "legislation_url": "https://openlegislation.uk/eu-decision-2018-1841",
  "path": "annex/division/4",
  "kind": "division",
  "number": null,
  "heading": "Budget Item: 6711",
  "text": "Member State\nMeasure\nFY\nReason\nType\nCorrection %\nCurrency\nAmount\nDeductions\nFinancial Impact\nAT\nRural Development EAFRD measures subject to IACS\n2016\nDeficiency regarding active farmer status under Art. 9(2) of R.1307/2013 - EAFRD\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 7 474,3\n0,00\n– 7 474,3\nRural Development EAFRD measures subject to IACS\n2017\nDeficiency regarding active farmer status under Art. 9(2) of R.1307/2013 - EAFRD\nESTIMATED BY PERCENTAGE\n0,47 %\nEUR\n– 201 955,26\n0,00\n– 201 955,26\nTotal AT:\nEUR\n– 209 429,56\n0,00\n– 209 429,56\nMember State\nMeasure\nFY\nReason\nType\nCorrection %\nCurrency\nAmount\nDeductions\nFinancial Impact\nBE\nCertification\n2016\nKnown error EARDF for FY 2016\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 630 956,0\n0,00\n– 630 956,0\nCertification\n2016\nMLE EARDF IACS FOR FY 2016\nESTIMATED BY AMOUNT\nEUR\n– 24 973,87\n0,00\n– 24 973,87\nCertification\n2016\nMLE EARDF NON-IACS FOR FY 2016\nESTIMATED BY AMOUNT\nEUR\n– 430,80\n0,00\n– 430,80\nTotal BE:\nEUR\n– 656 360,67\n0,00\n– 656 360,67\nMember State\nMeasure\nFY\nReason\nType\nCorrection %\nCurrency\nAmount\nDeductions\nFinancial Impact\nDE\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 4 LEADER (2007-2013)\n2013\n1a-Individual error in public procurement (File 2) - Calculated correction (10 %)\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 981,31\n0,00\n– 981,31\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 4 LEADER (2007-2013)\n2014\n1a-Individual error in public procurement (File 2) - Calculated correction (10 %)\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 1 552,36\n0,00\n– 1 552,36\nRural Development EAFRD Leader\n2015\n1b-Individual error in public procurement (File 2) - Calculated correction (10 %)\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 1 672,7\n0,00\n– 1 672,7\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 4 LEADER (2007-2013)\n2010\n2a-Individual error in public procurement (File 7) - Calculated correction (10 %)\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 2 568,8\n0,00\n– 2 568,8\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 4 LEADER (2007-2013)\n2011\n2a-Individual error in public procurement (File 7) - Calculated correction (10 %)\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 2 115,88\n0,00\n– 2 115,88\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 4 LEADER (2007-2013)\n2012\n2a-Individual error in public procurement (File 7) - Calculated correction (10 %)\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 902,46\n0,00\n– 902,46\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 4 LEADER (2007-2013)\n2013\n2a-Individual error in public procurement (File 7) - Calculated correction (10 %)\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 902,46\n0,00\n– 902,46\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 4 LEADER (2007-2013)\n2014\n2a-Individual error in public procurement (File 7) - Calculated correction (10 %)\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 1 216,8\n0,00\n– 1 216,8\nRural Development EAFRD Leader\n2015\n2a-Individual error in public procurement (File 7) - Calculated correction (10 %)\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 1 401,01\n0,00\n– 1 401,01\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 4 LEADER (2007-2013)\n2014\n3a-Deficiencies in administrative checks on public procurement\nFLAT RATE\n3,00 %\nEUR\n– 69 095,14\n0,00\n– 69 095,14\nRural Development EAFRD Leader\n2015\n3b-Deficiencies in administrative checks on public procurement\nFLAT RATE\n3,00 %\nEUR\n– 559 669,26\n– 1 557,83\n– 558 111,43\nRural Development EAFRD Leader\n2016\n3b-Deficiencies in administrative checks on public procurement\nFLAT RATE\n3,00 %\nEUR\n– 365 056,56\n– 6 266,59\n– 358 789,97\nCertification\n2016\nEAFRD IACS - audit case no 11\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 607,28\n0,00\n– 607,28\nCertification\n2016\nEAFRD IACS - audit case no 129\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 16 831,09\n0,00\n– 16 831,09\nCertification\n2016\nEAFRD IACS - audit case no 6\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 477,71\n0,00\n– 477,71\nCertification\n2016\nEAFRD IACS - audit case no 71\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 119,73\n0,00\n– 119,73\nCertification\n2016\nEAFRD non-IACS - audit case no 2\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 35 831,0\n0,00\n– 35 831,0\nCertification\n2016\nEAFRD non-IACS - audit case no 27\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 4 396,5\n0,00\n– 4 396,5\nCertification\n2016\nEAFRD non-IACS - audit case no 34\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 1 432,51\n0,00\n– 1 432,51\nCertification\n2016\nEAFRD non-IACS - audit case no 43\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 23 887,0\n0,00\n– 23 887,0\nCertification\n2016\nEAFRD non-IACS - audit case no 51\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 848,29\n0,00\n– 848,29\nTotal DE:\nEUR\n– 1 091 565,85\n– 7 824,42\n– 1 083 741,43\nMember State\nMeasure\nFY\nReason\nType\nCorrection %\nCurrency\nAmount\nDeductions\nFinancial Impact\nES\nRural Development EAFRD investment - private beneficiaries\n2016\nDeficiencies in checks of the reasonableness of the costs for M123 (FY2016 transitional)\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 2 229,43\n0,00\n– 2 229,43\nRural Development EAFRD investment - private beneficiaries\n2015\nDeficiencies in the evaluation of the reasonableness of the costs for M123 (FY 2015)\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 126 999,41\n0,00\n– 126 999,41\nRural Development EAFRD investment - private beneficiaries\n2015\nDeficiencies in the evaluation of the reasonableness of the costs for M123 (FY2016)\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 17 905,78\n0,00\n– 17 905,78\nCertification\n2016\nEAFRD known errors\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 46 723,27\n0,00\n– 46 723,27\nRural Development EAFRD investment - private beneficiaries\n2016\nInsufficient quality of expost checks (M121)\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 33 740,92\n0,00\n– 33 740,92\nCertification\n2016\nKnown errors for EAFRD - EUR 56 200,38\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 56 200,38\n0,00\n– 56 200,38\nCertification\n2016\nMLE for EAFRD EUR 17 124,08\nESTIMATED BY AMOUNT\nEUR\n– 17 124,08\n0,00\n– 17 124,08\nCertification\n2016\nrandom errors EAFRD\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 2 390,5\n0,00\n– 2 390,5\nRural Development EAFRD investment - private beneficiaries\n2015\nVerfication of the payment claim\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 91 814,57\n0,00\n– 91 814,57\nTotal ES:\nEUR\n– 395 128,34\n0,00\n– 395 128,34\nMember State\nMeasure\nFY\nReason\nType\nCorrection %\nCurrency\nAmount\nDeductions\nFinancial Impact\nFR\nCertification\n2016\nCEB/2017/046/FR - extrapolated error in EAFRD\nESTIMATED BY AMOUNT\nEUR\n– 1 768,57\n0,00\n– 1 768,57\nCertification\n2016\nCEB/2017/046/FR - known errors in EAFRD\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 27 977,0\n0,00\n– 27 977,0\nCross-compliance\n2013\nRD (SMR 1, 2, 5 not checked)\nFLAT RATE\n2,00 %\nEUR\n– 532 897,4\n– 489 608,41\n– 43 288,99\nCross-compliance\n2014\nRD (SMR 1, 2, 5 not checked)\nFLAT RATE\n2,00 %\nEUR\n– 668 690,92\n0,00\n– 668 690,92\nTotal FR:\nEUR\n– 1 231 333,89\n– 489 608,41\n– 741 725,48\nMember State\nMeasure\nFY\nReason\nType\nCorrection %\nCurrency\nAmount\nDeductions\nFinancial Impact\nGB\nRural Development EAFRD investment - private beneficiaries\n2015\nLack of audit trail in relation to in-situ visits - FY2015 - Measure 216\nFLAT RATE\n3,00 %\nEUR\n– 10 380,46\n0,00\n– 10 380,46\nRural Development EAFRD forestry measures\n2015\nLack of audit trail in relation to in-situ visits - FY2015 - Measure 221.\nFLAT RATE\n10,00 %\nEUR\n– 13 254,64\n0,00\n– 13 254,64\nRural Development EAFRD forestry measures\n2015\nLack of audit trail in relation to in-situ visits - FY2015 - Measure 227.\nFLAT RATE\n10,00 %\nEUR\n– 148 643,71\n0,00\n– 148 643,71\nRural Development EAFRD investment - private beneficiaries\n2016\nLack of audit trail in relation to in-situ visits - FY2016 - Measure 216 paid under M04 of the new programming period.\nFLAT RATE\n3,00 %\nEUR\n– 7 565,26\n0,00\n– 7 565,26\nRural Development EAFRD investment - private beneficiaries\n2017\nLack of audit trail in relation to in-situ-visits - FY2017 - Measure 216 paid under M04 of the new programming period.\nFLAT RATE\n3,00 %\nEUR\n– 726,75\n0,00\n– 726,75\nRural Development EAFRD measures subject to IACS\n2016\nM10: Lack of systematic cross-checks against animal databases to assess the requirement on livestock density and lack of livestock assessment on the spot - CY2015\nFLAT RATE\n10,00 %\nEUR\n– 476 492,21\n0,00\n– 476 492,21\nRural Development EAFRD measures subject to IACS\n2016\nM14: Lack of systematic cross-checks against animal databases to assess the requirement on livestock density, lack of livestock assessment on the spot and penalty system not compliant - CY2015\nFLAT RATE\n10,00 %\nEUR\n– 20 700,0\n0,00\n– 20 700,0\nRural Development EAFRD forestry measures\n2016\nM221/M08: Lack of administrative check regarding the income-foregone payments - CY2015\nFLAT RATE\n10,00 %\nEUR\n– 23 435,0\n0,00\n– 23 435,0\nRural Development EAFRD forestry measures\n2017\nM221/M08: Lack of administrative check regarding the income-foregone payments CY2016\nFLAT RATE\n10,00 %\nEUR\n– 23 435,0\n0,00\n– 23 435,0\nCross-compliance\n2014\nRD - CY 2014 - Deficient OTSC\nFLAT RATE\n2,00 %\nEUR\n– 501 789,15\n0,00\n– 501 789,15\nCross-compliance\n2015\nRD - CY 2014 - Deficient OTSC\nFLAT RATE\n2,00 %\nEUR\n– 397 720,77\n0,00\n– 397 720,77\nCross-compliance\n2015\nRD - CY 2015 - Deficient OTSC\nFLAT RATE\n2,00 %\nEUR\n– 253 812,96\n– 257,81\n– 253 555,15\nCross-compliance\n2016\nRD - CY 2015 - Deficient OTSC\nFLAT RATE\n2,00 %\nEUR\n– 410 094,33\n0,00\n– 410 094,33\nRural Development EAFRD investment - private beneficiaries\n2015\nSelf-declaration for payments including VAT - FY2015 - Measure 216.\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 88 233,89\n0,00\n– 88 233,89\nTotal GB:\nEUR\n– 2 376 284,13\n– 257,81\n– 2 376 026,32\nMember State\nMeasure\nFY\nReason\nType\nCorrection %\nCurrency\nAmount\nDeductions\nFinancial Impact\nGR\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area related measures)\n2009\nLPIS weakness\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 2 397 552,06\n0,00\n– 2 397 552,06\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area related measures)\n2010\nLPIS weakness\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 805 546,96\n0,00\n– 805 546,96\nTotal GR:\nEUR\n– 3 203 099,02\n0,00\n– 3 203 099,02\nMember State\nMeasure\nFY\nReason\nType\nCorrection %\nCurrency\nAmount\nDeductions\nFinancial Impact\nHR\nRural Development EAFRD measures subject to IACS\n2016\nAppropriate checks to ensure that application fulfil all eligibility criteria as laid down in the EU legislation and in the RDP of the Member State or region (M10 - M11 - CY2015 and 2016 - FY2016)\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 101 099,73\n– 45 886,85\n– 55 212,88\nClearance of Accounts - Financial Clearance\n2016\nKnown error detected by CB in the context of financial clearance (EAFRD IACS)\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 53 125,78\n0,00\n– 53 125,78\nTotal HR:\nEUR\n– 154 225,51\n– 45 886,85\n– 108 338,66\nMember State\nMeasure\nFY\nReason\nType\nCorrection %\nCurrency\nAmount\nDeductions\nFinancial Impact\nHU\nCertification\n2016\nEAFRD - Financial error\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 50,02\n0,00\n– 50,02\nCertification\n2016\nEAFRD - Known error\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 419 402,55\n0,00\n– 419 402,55\nRural Development EAFRD investment - private beneficiaries\n2015\nIncompliances with respect to the public procurement rules\nESTIMATED BY PERCENTAGE\n0,10 %\nEUR\n– 2 117,92\n– 2 117,92\n0,00\nRural Development EAFRD investment - public beneficiaries\n2015\nIncompliances with respect to the public procurement rules\nESTIMATED BY PERCENTAGE\n0,10 %\nEUR\n– 15 280,22\n– 15 280,22\n0,00\nRural Development EAFRD Measures with flat-rate support\n2015\nIncompliances with respect to the public procurement rules\nESTIMATED BY PERCENTAGE\n0,10 %\nEUR\n– 12 762,94\n– 12 762,94\n0,00\nRural Development EAFRD investment - private beneficiaries\n2016\nIncompliances with respect to the public procurement rules\nESTIMATED BY PERCENTAGE\n0,10 %\nEUR\n– 846,96\n– 838,29\n– 8,67\nRural Development EAFRD investment - public beneficiaries\n2016\nIncompliances with respect to the public procurement rules\nESTIMATED BY PERCENTAGE\n0,10 %\nEUR\n– 68 740,57\n– 11 603,59\n– 57 136,98\nRural Development EAFRD Measures with flat-rate support\n2016\nIncompliances with respect to the public procurement rules\nESTIMATED BY PERCENTAGE\n0,10 %\nEUR\n– 15 242,66\n– 3 610,66\n– 11 632,0\nRural Development EAFRD investment - private beneficiaries\n2017\nIncompliances with respect to the public procurement rules\nESTIMATED BY PERCENTAGE\n0,10 %\nEUR\n– 179,34\n0,00\n– 179,34\nRural Development EAFRD investment - public beneficiaries\n2017\nIncompliances with respect to the public procurement rules\nESTIMATED BY PERCENTAGE\n0,10 %\nEUR\n– 249,97\n0,00\n– 249,97\nRural Development EAFRD Measures with flat-rate support\n2017\nIncompliances with respect to the public procurement rules\nESTIMATED BY PERCENTAGE\n0,10 %\nEUR\n– 22,75\n0,00\n– 22,75\nTotal HU:\nEUR\n– 534 895,9\n– 46 213,62\n– 488 682,28\nMember State\nMeasure\nFY\nReason\nType\nCorrection %\nCurrency\nAmount\nDeductions\nFinancial Impact\nIE\nCertification\n2016\nFINANCIAL ERRORS DETECTED BY THE CB\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 289 762,08\n0,00\n– 289 762,08\nTotal IE:\nEUR\n– 289 762,08\n0,00\n– 289 762,08\nMember State\nMeasure\nFY\nReason\nType\nCorrection %\nCurrency\nAmount\nDeductions\nFinancial Impact\nIT\nRural Development EAFRD measures subject to IACS\n2016\nAbsence of evidence of the calculation of livestock density during on-the-spot checks - FY2016 - Measure 10 - Operation 10.1.1.\nFLAT RATE\n2,00 %\nEUR\n– 16 181,19\n0,00\n– 16 181,19\nRural Development EAFRD measures subject to IACS\n2017\nAbsence of evidence of the calculation of livestock density during on-the-spot checks - FY2016 - Measure 10 - Operation 10.1.1.\nFLAT RATE\n2,00 %\nEUR\n– 15 722,34\n0,00\n– 15 722,34\nRural Development EAFRD measures subject to IACS\n2016\nAbsence of evidence of the calculation of livestock density during on-the-spot checks - FY2016 - Measure 10 - Operation 10.1.2.\nFLAT RATE\n2,00 %\nEUR\n– 11 965,46\n0,00\n– 11 965,46\nRural Development EAFRD measures subject to IACS\n2017\nAbsence of evidence of the calculation of livestock density during on-the-spot checks - FY2016 - Measure 10 - Operation 10.1.2.\nFLAT RATE\n2,00 %\nEUR\n– 11 626,16\n0,00\n– 11 626,16\nRural Development EAFRD measures subject to IACS\n2016\nAbsence of evidence of the calculation of livestock density during on-the-spot checks - FY2016 - Measure 10 - Operation 10.1.3.\nFLAT RATE\n2,00 %\nEUR\n– 2 414,45\n0,00\n– 2 414,45\nRural Development EAFRD measures subject to IACS\n2017\nAbsence of evidence of the calculation of livestock density during on-the-spot checks - FY2016 - Measure 10 - Operation 10.1.3.\nFLAT RATE\n2,00 %\nEUR\n– 2 345,98\n0,00\n– 2 345,98\nRural Development EAFRD measures subject to IACS\n2016\nAbsence of evidence of the calculation of livestock density during on-the-spot checks - FY2016 - Measure 11 - Operation 11.1.1.\nFLAT RATE\n2,00 %\nEUR\n0,00\n0,00\n0,00\nRural Development EAFRD measures subject to IACS\n2017\nAbsence of evidence of the calculation of livestock density during on-the-spot checks - FY2016 - Measure 11 - Operation 11.1.1.\nFLAT RATE\n2,00 %\nEUR\n– 806,75\n0,00\n– 806,75\nRural Development EAFRD measures subject to IACS\n2016\nAbsence of evidence of the calculation of livestock density during on-the-spot checks - FY2016 - Measure 11 - Operation 11.2.1.\nFLAT RATE\n2,00 %\nEUR\n0,00\n0,00\n0,00\nRural Development EAFRD measures subject to IACS\n2017\nAbsence of evidence of the calculation of livestock density during on-the-spot checks - FY2016 - Measure 11 - Operation 11.2.1.\nFLAT RATE\n2,00 %\nEUR\n– 1 666,15\n0,00\n– 1 666,15\nRural Development EAFRD measures subject to IACS\n2016\nAbsence of evidence of the calculation of livestock density during on-the-spot checks - FY2016 - Measure 13 - Operation 13.1.1.\nFLAT RATE\n2,00 %\nEUR\n– 56 267,29\n0,00\n– 56 267,29\nRural Development EAFRD measures subject to IACS\n2017\nAbsence of evidence of the calculation of livestock density during on-the-spot checks - FY2016 - Measure 13 - Operation 13.1.1.\nFLAT RATE\n2,00 %\nEUR\n– 26 678,19\n0,00\n– 26 678,19\nTotal IT:\nEUR\n– 145 673,96\n0,00\n– 145 673,96\nMember State\nMeasure\nFY\nReason\nType\nCorrection %\nCurrency\nAmount\nDeductions\nFinancial Impact\nPL\nCertification\n2015\nFinancial errors in the EAFRD non-IACS population\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 10 244,55\n0,00\n– 10 244,55\nTotal PL:\nEUR\n– 10 244,55\n0,00\n– 10 244,55\nMember State\nMeasure\nFY\nReason\nType\nCorrection %\nCurrency\nAmount\nDeductions\nFinancial Impact\nPT\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 4 LEADER (2007-2013)\n2014\n1-Measure 413 (sub-measures 311, 312, 313): ineligible costs for jobs to be created/maintained\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 467 842,77\n0,00\n– 467 842,77\nRural Development EAFRD Leader\n2015\n1-Measure 413 (sub-measures 311, 312, 313): ineligible costs for jobs to be created/maintained\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 1 212 190,33\n0,00\n– 1 212 190,33\nRural Development EAFRD Leader\n2016\n1-Measure 413 (sub-measures 311, 312, 313): ineligible costs for jobs to be created/maintained\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 94 360,25\n0,00\n– 94 360,25\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 4 LEADER (2007-2013)\n2014\n2-Measure 413 (sub-measures 311, 312, 313, 323): deficiencies in checks on the reasonableness of costs\nFLAT RATE\n100,00 %\nEUR\n– 301 512,95\n0,00\n– 301 512,95\nRural Development EAFRD Leader\n2015\n2-Measure 413 (sub-measures 311, 312, 313, 323): deficiencies in checks on the reasonableness of costs\nFLAT RATE\n100,00 %\nEUR\n– 248 459,07\n0,00\n– 248 459,07\nRural Development EAFRD Leader\n2016\n2-Measure 413 (sub-measures 311, 312, 313, 323): deficiencies in checks on the reasonableness of costs\nFLAT RATE\n100,00 %\nEUR\n– 57 404,7\n0,00\n– 57 404,7\nCertification\n2015\nClearance of accounts decision for financial year 2015 and Clearance of EAFRD accounts decision related to the last execution year (16.10.2014-31.12.2015) in respect of the 2007-2013 programming period.\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 15 000,61\n0,00\n– 15 000,61\nCross-compliance\n2014\ncorrection RD CY 2013\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n10 380,28\n0,00\n10 380,28\nCross-compliance\n2014\ncorrection RD CY 2014\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n22 589,96\n0,00\n22 589,96\nCross-compliance\n2015\ncorrection RD CY 2014\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n98 204,04\n0,00\n98 204,04\nCross-compliance\n2015\ncorrection RD CY 2015\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n33 486,89\n0,00\n33 486,89\nCross-compliance\n2016\ncorrection RD CY 2015\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n90 178,07\n0,00\n90 178,07\nCertification\n2016\nEAFRD - Clearance of accounts decision related to the last execution year (Q5 - 16.10.2014-31.12.2015) in respect of the 2007-2013 programming period.\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 3 041 420,01\n– 9 024,71\n– 3 032 395,3\nCertification\n2015\nExpenditure declared in the last execution year for Rural Development measure 511 which was not declared in the financial year when the actual payment was made\nESTIMATED BY AMOUNT\nEUR\n– 939 516,0\n0,00\n– 939 516,0\nCertification\n2016\nExtrapolated error for the 5th quarter (Q5 - 16.10.2015-31.12.2015) of the last execution year for the EAFRD non-IACS population (EUR 63 248,59)\nESTIMATED BY AMOUNT\nEUR\n– 63 248,59\n– 21 747,68\n– 41 500,91\nCross-compliance\n2014\nRD - CY 2013 - Deficient checks of SMRs 2, 7, 8, 9, 11, 12, 16-18 - Missing GAEC ‘Crop rotation’ - Tolerances and leniency of the sanctioning system\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 129 966,15\n0,00\n– 129 966,15\nCross-compliance\n2014\nRD - CY 2014 - Deficient checks of SMRs 2, 9, 11, 12, 16-18 - Missing GAEC ‘Crop rotation’ - Tolerances and leniency of the sanctioning system\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 204 951,05\n0,00\n– 204 951,05\nCross-compliance\n2015\nRD - CY 2014 - Deficient checks of SMRs 2, 9, 11, 12, 16-18 - Missing GAEC ‘Crop rotation’ - Tolerances and leniency of the sanctioning system\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 220 275,94\n– 881,07\n– 219 394,87\nCross-compliance\n2015\nRD - CY 2015 - Deficient checks of SMRs 2, 9, 11, 12, 16-18 - Tolerances and leniency of the sanctioning system\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 24 809,88\n– 164,16\n– 24 645,72\nCross-compliance\n2016\nRD - CY 2015 - Deficient checks of SMRs 2, 9, 11, 12, 16-18 - Tolerances and leniency of the sanctioning system\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 1 626 056,75\n0,00\n– 1 626 056,75\nCertification\n2015\nThe MLE for Q1-Q4 EAFRD population\nESTIMATED BY AMOUNT\nEUR\n– 2 849 591,0\n– 257 376,75\n– 2 592 214,25\nTotal PT:\nEUR\n– 11 241 766,81\n– 289 194,37\n– 10 952 572,44\nMember State\nMeasure\nFY\nReason\nType\nCorrection %\nCurrency\nAmount\nDeductions\nFinancial Impact\nRO\nRural Development EAFRD Investment - public beneficiaries\n2014\nSeveral non-compliances with the legal framework on Public Procurement\nESTIMATED BY PERCENTAGE\n2,44 %\nEUR\n– 3 923 959,54\n0,00\n– 3 923 959,54\nRural Development EAFRD investment - private beneficiaries\n2015\nSeveral non-compliances with the legal framework on Public Procurement\nESTIMATED BY PERCENTAGE\n2,44 %\nEUR\n– 3 280 175,58\n0,00\n– 3 280 175,58\nRural Development EAFRD investment - public beneficiaries\n2015\nSeveral non-compliances with the legal framework on Public Procurement\nESTIMATED BY PERCENTAGE\n2,44 %\nEUR\n– 2 755 091,05\n0,00\n– 2 755 091,05\nRural Development EAFRD Measures with flat-rate support\n2015\nSeveral non-compliances with the legal framework on Public Procurement\nESTIMATED BY PERCENTAGE\n2,44 %\nEUR\n– 260 292,18\n0,00\n– 260 292,18\nRural Development EAFRD investment - private beneficiaries\n2016\nSeveral non-compliances with the legal framework on Public Procurement\nESTIMATED BY PERCENTAGE\n2,44 %\nEUR\n– 683 995,9\n0,00\n– 683 995,9\nRural Development EAFRD investment - public beneficiaries\n2016\nSeveral non-compliances with the legal framework on Public Procurement\nESTIMATED BY PERCENTAGE\n2,44 %\nEUR\n– 452 827,98\n0,00\n– 452 827,98\nRural Development EAFRD Measures with flat-rate support\n2016\nSeveral non-compliances with the legal framework on Public Procurement\nESTIMATED BY PERCENTAGE\n2,44 %\nEUR\n– 115 226,97\n0,00\n– 115 226,97\nTotal RO:\nEUR\n– 11 471 569,2\n0,00\n– 11 471 569,2\nMember State\nMeasure\nFY\nReason\nType\nCorrection %\nCurrency\nAmount\nDeductions\nFinancial Impact\nSE\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 1+3 - Investment orientated measures (2007-2013)\n2012\nabsence of double financing verifications\nFLAT RATE\n10,00 %\nEUR\n– 65 461,21\n– 21 733,12\n– 43 728,09\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 1+3 - Investment orientated measures (2007-2013)\n2013\nabsence of double financing verifications\nFLAT RATE\n10,00 %\nEUR\n– 620 898,88\n– 15 648,02\n– 605 250,86\nRural Development EAFRD Investment - public beneficiaries\n2014\nabsence of double financing verifications\nFLAT RATE\n10,00 %\nEUR\n– 291 505,9\n– 86 612,45\n– 204 893,45\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 1+3 - Investment orientated measures (2007-2013)\n2013\nabsence of verification of the costs claims\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 6 970,99\n0,00\n– 6 970,99\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 1+3 - Investment orientated measures (2007-2013)\n2012\nabsence of verification of the SME criteria and deficiencies in the application of selection criteria and in the assessment of costs reasonableness\nFLAT RATE\n10,00 %\nEUR\n– 55 086,77\n– 18 288,81\n– 36 797,96\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 1+3 - Investment orientated measures (2007-2013)\n2013\nabsence of verification of the SME criteria and deficiencies in the application of selection criteria and in the assessment of costs reasonableness\nFLAT RATE\n10,00 %\nEUR\n– 363 222,29\n0,00\n– 363 222,29\nRural Development EAFRD Investment - private beneficiaries\n2014\nabsence of verification of the SME criteria and deficiencies in the application of selection criteria and in the assessment of costs reasonableness\nFLAT RATE\n10,00 %\nEUR\n– 245 246,39\n– 72 867,78\n– 172 378,61\nRural Development EAFRD investment - private beneficiaries\n2015\nabsence of verification of the SME criteria and deficiencies in the application of selection criteria and in the assessment of costs reasonableness\nFLAT RATE\n10,00 %\nEUR\n– 64 295,86\n0,00\n– 64 295,86\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 1+3 - Investment orientated measures (2007-2013)\n2008\nabsence of verification of the SME criteria and of risk of double financing and deficiencies in the application of selection criteria and in the assessment of costs reasonableness\nFLAT RATE\n10,00 %\nEUR\n– 751,03\n0,00\n– 751,03\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 1+3 - Investment orientated measures (2007-2013)\n2009\nabsence of verification of the SME criteria and of risk of double financing and deficiencies in the application of selection criteria and in the assessment of costs reasonableness\nFLAT RATE\n10,00 %\nEUR\n– 320,70\n0,00\n– 320,70\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 1+3 - Investment orientated measures (2007-2013)\n2011\nabsence of verification of the SME criteria and of risk of double financing and deficiencies in the application of selection criteria and in the assessment of costs reasonableness\nFLAT RATE\n10,00 %\nEUR\n– 2 236,29\n– 67,59\n– 2 168,7\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 1+3 - Investment orientated measures (2007-2013)\n2012\nabsence of verification of the SME criteria and of risk of double financing and deficiencies in the application of selection criteria and in the assessment of costs reasonableness\nFLAT RATE\n10,00 %\nEUR\n– 113 768,81\n– 37 771,25\n– 75 997,56\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 1+3 - Investment orientated measures (2007-2013)\n2013\nabsence of verification of the SME criteria and of risk of double financing and deficiencies in the application of selection criteria and in the assessment of costs reasonableness\nFLAT RATE\n10,00 %\nEUR\n– 472 874,38\n0,00\n– 472 874,38\nRural Development EAFRD Investment - private beneficiaries\n2014\nabsence of verification of the SME criteria and of risk of double financing and deficiencies in the application of selection criteria and in the assessment of costs reasonableness\nFLAT RATE\n10,00 %\nEUR\n– 347 992,77\n– 103 395,86\n– 244 596,91\nRural Development EAFRD Measures with flat-rate support\n2015\nabsence of verification of the SME criteria and of risk of double financing and deficiencies in the application of selection criteria and in the assessment of costs reasonableness\nFLAT RATE\n10,00 %\nEUR\n– 283 956,93\n0,00\n– 283 956,93\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 1 (2007-2013)\n2007\ndeficiencies in the application of selection criteria and concerning the assessment of costs reasonableness\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 2 143,59\n0,00\n– 2 143,59\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 1+3 - Investment orientated measures (2007-2013)\n2012\ndeficiencies in the application of selection criteria and concerning the assessment of costs reasonableness\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 131 152,67\n– 87 085,37\n– 44 067,3\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 1+3 - Investment orientated measures (2007-2013)\n2013\ndeficiencies in the application of selection criteria and concerning the assessment of costs reasonableness\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 1 241 577,53\n– 2 978,52\n– 1 238 599,01\nRural Development EAFRD Investment - private beneficiaries\n2014\ndeficiencies in the application of selection criteria and concerning the assessment of costs reasonableness\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 750 589,53\n– 442 938,45\n– 307 651,08\nRural Development EAFRD Investment - public beneficiaries\n2014\ndeficiencies in the application of selection criteria and concerning the assessment of costs reasonableness\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 845 717,03\n– 499 075,16\n– 346 641,87\nRural Development EAFRD investment - private beneficiaries\n2015\ndeficiencies in the application of selection criteria and concerning the assessment of costs reasonableness\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 264 235,27\n0,00\n– 264 235,27\nRural Development EAFRD investment - public beneficiaries\n2015\ndeficiencies in the application of selection criteria and concerning the assessment of costs reasonableness\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 1 632 649,18\n28 498,3\n– 1 661 147,48\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 1+3 - Investment orientated measures (2007-2013)\n2008\ndeficiencies in the application of selection criteria and concerning the assessment of costs reasonableness\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 681,88\n0,00\n– 681,88\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 1+3 - Investment orientated measures (2007-2013)\n2010\ndeficiencies in the application of selection criteria and concerning the assessment of costs reasonableness\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 490,86\n0,00\n– 490,86\nTotal SE:\nEUR\n– 7 803 826,74\n– 1 359 964,08\n– 6 443 862,66\nCurrency\nAmount\nDeductions\nFinancial Impact\nEUR\n– 40 815 166,21\n– 2 238 949,56\n– 38 576 216,65",
  "extent": "E+W+S+N.I.",
  "status": null,
  "version": "current",
  "annotations": [],
  "outstanding_effects": [],
  "provenance": {
    "source": "legislation.gov.uk",
    "source_url": "https://www.legislation.gov.uk/eudn/2018/1841/annex/division/4",
    "retrieved_at": "2026-11-01T15:12:56.396100+00:00"
  },
  "licence": "Open Government Licence v3.0",
  "licence_url": "https://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/version/3/",
  "attribution": "Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Source: legislation.gov.uk, The National Archives."
}