Division (b) Award criteria
United Kingdom
The following award criteria will only be applied to the full proposal. All proposals that meet the eligibility (and selection) criteria are admitted to an in-depth evaluation of their quality in the award phase. A proposal admitted to this phase will be given scores on the basis of the following award criteria:
| A project proposal has to reach at least the minimum pass score for each award criterion and also the sum of scores for criteria for which a minimum score has been fixed has to be equivalent to 50* points or more. | ||
| Award criteria | Minimum pass scoref1 | Maximum score |
|---|---|---|
| 1. Technical coherence and quality | 10 | 20 |
| 2. Financial coherence and quality (including value for money) | 10 | 20 |
| EU added value | ||
| Pass/fail criteria | ||
| 3. Extent and quality of the contribution to the objectives | 10 | 20 |
| 4. Sustainability (continuation, replication and/or transfer) | 8 | 15 |
| Bonus: | ||
| 5. Extent and quality of mobilisation of other funds, in particular Union funds | — | 10 |
| 6. Synergies (including multipurpose and integration/complementarity (max. 8 points), Green Public Procurement (max. 1 point), Ecolabel (max. 1 point), and uptake EU-research results (max. 1 point)) — Transnational (max. 4 points) | — | 15 |
| Overall (pass) scores | 50 | 100 |
The following award criteria are specific or contain elements that are specific to integrated projects:
Annotations
Footnotes
- f1
-
A project proposal has to reach at least the minimum pass score for each award criterion and also the sum of scores for criteria for which a minimum score has been fixed has to be equivalent to 50* points or more.
Notes on Division 5
Footnotes
- f1
-
The meaning of the term ‘selection’ in Article 24(2)(d) of the LIFE Regulation includes the meaning of the term ‘eligibility’ in Article 19 LIFE Regulation and Article 131 of the Financial Regulation.