Division (b) Award criteria
United Kingdom
Other projects will be awarded to the legal entity/ies which submit/s a proposal which surpasses the pass score and which reach(es) the highest score(s) regarding the following criteria:
| A project proposal has to reach at least the minimum pass score for each award criterion and also the sum of scores for criteria for which a minimum score has been fixed has to be equivalent to 55 points or more. | ||
| Criteria | Minimum pass scoref1 | Maximum score |
|---|---|---|
| Technical coherence and quality of the proposal in relation to the specific need addressed | 30 | 50 |
| Financial coherence and quality (including value for money) | 20 | 30 |
| Comprehensiveness of the approach in relation to the specific need addressed | — | 10 |
| Synergies (see traditional projects) | — | 10 |
| Overall (pass) scores | 55 | 100 |
Annotations
Footnotes
- f1
-
A project proposal has to reach at least the minimum pass score for each award criterion and also the sum of scores for criteria for which a minimum score has been fixed has to be equivalent to 55 points or more.
Notes on Division 5
Footnotes
- f1
-
The meaning of the term ‘selection’ in Article 24(2)(d) of the LIFE Regulation includes the meaning of the term ‘eligibility’ in Article 19 LIFE Regulation and Article 131 of the Financial Regulation.
Notes on Division 5.1
Footnotes
Notes on Division 5.1.6
Footnotes
- f1
-
Studies show that investment capital would be readily available from different sources for ‘green investment’, but that there are not enough well prepared (‘bankable’) proposals. It is intended to fill this gap through a specific call that addresses developers of (potentially) economically viable projects which have the potential to create a significant environment or climate action impact necessary to achieve the general objectives set out in Article 3 of the LIFE Regulation.