{
  "url": "https://openlegislation.uk/eu-decision-2018-873/annex/division-2",
  "json_url": "https://openlegislation.uk/eu-decision-2018-873/annex/division-2.json",
  "legislation": "eudn/2018/873",
  "legislation_title": "Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2018/873 of 13 June 2018 excluding from European Union financing certain expenditure incurred by the Member States under the European Agricultural Guarantee Fund (EAGF) and under the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) (notified under document C(2018) 3826) (Only the Bulgarian, Czech, Danish, English, Finnish, French, German, Greek, Hungarian, Italian, Polish, Romanian, Spanish and Swedish texts are authentic)",
  "legislation_url": "https://openlegislation.uk/eu-decision-2018-873",
  "path": "annex/division/2",
  "kind": "division",
  "number": null,
  "heading": "Budget Item: 6711",
  "text": "Member State\nMeasure\nFY\nReason\nType\nCorrection %\nCurrency\nAmount\nDeductions\nFinancial Impact\nBG\nCertification\n2016\nCEB/2017/005/BG - MLE in the EAFRD population\nESTIMATED BY AMOUNT\nEUR\n– 1 834 947,67\n– 160 347,68\n– 1 674 599,99\nRural Development EAFRD (2014-2020) measures subject to IACS\n2016\nIdentification of reference parcels in a computerised LPIS-GIS with at least the requirements in Article 5 of Regulation 640/2014 (measure 12 of RDP 2014-2020).\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 1 837 276,9\n0,00\n– 1 837 276,9\nRural Development EAFRD (2014-2020) measures subject to IACS\n2016\nIdentification of reference parcels in a computerised LPIS-GIS with at least the requirements in Article 5 of Regulation 640/2014 (measure 13 of RDP 2014-2020).\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 210 464,02\n0,00\n– 210 464,02\nRural Development EAFRD (2014-2020) measures subject to IACS\n2017\nVerification of the compliance with the rules of organic farming (measure 11 of RDP 2014-2020).\nEXTRAPOLATED\n3,35 %\nEUR\n– 606 372,8\n0,00\n– 606 372,8\nRural Development EAFRD (2014-2020) measures subject to IACS\n2015\nVerification of the compliance with the rules of organic farming (measure 214 of RDP 2007-2013 and measure 11 of RDP 2014-2020).\nEXTRAPOLATED\n3,35 %\nEUR\n– 292 993,48\n– 5 859,87\n– 287 133,61\nRural Development EAFRD (2014-2020) measures subject to IACS\n2016\nVerification of the compliance with the rules of organic farming (measure 214 of RDP 2007-2013 and measure 11 of RDP 2014-2020).\nEXTRAPOLATED\n3,35 %\nEUR\n– 571 044,47\n0,00\n– 571 044,47\nTotal BG:\nEUR\n– 5 353 099,34\n– 166 207,55\n– 5 186 891,79\nMember State\nMeasure\nFY\nReason\nType\nCorrection %\nCurrency\nAmount\nDeductions\nFinancial Impact\nCZ\nRural Development EAFRD (2014-2020) measures subject to IACS\n2017\nPre-notification of on-the-spot checks for M214, M10, M11 and M13 in relation to claim year 2016 (paid in financial year 2017)\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 144 617,1\n0,00\n– 144 617,1\nRural Development EAFRD (2014-2020) measures subject to IACS\n2018\nPre-notification of on-the-spot checks for M214, M10, M11 and M13 in relation to claim year 2016 (paid in financial year 2018)\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 6 499,55\n0,00\n– 6 499,55\nTotal CZ:\nEUR\n– 151 116,65\n0,00\n– 151 116,65\nMember State\nMeasure\nFY\nReason\nType\nCorrection %\nCurrency\nAmount\nDeductions\nFinancial Impact\nDE\nCertification\n2016\nFinancial errors in the EAGF and EAFRD population\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 56 042,26\n0,00\n– 56 042,26\nCertification\n2015\nKnown errors (EAFRD non-IACS)\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 20 424,82\n0,00\n– 20 424,82\nCertification\n2015\nRandom errors on the expenditures of EAFRD non IACS\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 226 246,59\n0,00\n– 226 246,59\nTotal DE:\nEUR\n– 302 713,67\n0,00\n– 302 713,67\nMember State\nMeasure\nFY\nReason\nType\nCorrection %\nCurrency\nAmount\nDeductions\nFinancial Impact\nDK\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 4 LEADER (2007-2013)\n2014\n3 Key Controls deficient and 2 Ancillary Controls absent\nFLAT RATE\n10,00 %\nEUR\n– 1 264 137,31\n– 3 916,77\n– 1 260 220,54\nRural Development EAFRD Leader\n2015\n3 Key Controls deficient and 2 Ancillary Controls absent\nFLAT RATE\n10,00 %\nEUR\n– 1 205 474,58\n0,00\n– 1 205 474,58\nRural Development EAFRD Leader\n2016\n3 Key Controls deficient and 2 Ancillary Controls absent\nFLAT RATE\n10,00 %\nEUR\n– 897 168,81\n0,00\n– 897 168,81\nCertification\n2016\nCEB/2017/024/DK - errors in the EAGF and EAFRD populations\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 3 981,96\n0,00\n– 3 981,96\nTotal DK:\nEUR\n– 3 370 762,66\n– 3 916,77\n– 3 366 845,89\nMember State\nMeasure\nFY\nReason\nType\nCorrection %\nCurrency\nAmount\nDeductions\nFinancial Impact\nES\nCertification\n2016\nFINANCIAL ERRORS DETECTED BY THE CB\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 59 731,49\n0,00\n– 59 731,49\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 1 - Measures with flat rate support\n2014\nNon-compliance with the priority status requirements\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 63 257,98\n0,00\n– 63 257,98\nRural Development EAFRD (2014-2020) Measures with flat-rate support\n2015\nNon-compliance with the priority status requirements\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 197 252,51\n0,00\n– 197 252,51\nTotal ES:\nEUR\n– 320 241,98\n0,00\n– 320 241,98\nMember State\nMeasure\nFY\nReason\nType\nCorrection %\nCurrency\nAmount\nDeductions\nFinancial Impact\nFI\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 1+3 - Investment orientated measures (2007-2013)\n2011\nSelection of the beneficiaries process does not prioritise in order to support only those that best fulfil the objectives of the RDP\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 13 572,25\n0,00\n– 13 572,25\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 1+3 - Investment orientated measures (2007-2013)\n2012\nSelection of the beneficiaries process does not prioritise in order to support only those that best fulfil the objectives of the RDP\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 60 774,73\n0,00\n– 60 774,73\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 1+3 - Investment orientated measures (2007-2013)\n2013\nSelection of the beneficiaries process does not prioritise in order to support only those that best fulfil the objectives of the RDP\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 164 041,55\n0,00\n– 164 041,55\nRural Development EAFRD Investment - public beneficiaries\n2014\nSelection of the beneficiaries process does not prioritise in order to support only those that best fulfil the objectives of the RDP\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 395 521,13\n0,00\n– 395 521,13\nRural Development EAFRD (2014-2020) Investment - public beneficiaries\n2015\nSelection of the beneficiaries process does not prioritise in order to support only those that best fulfil the objectives of the RDP\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 526 480,02\n0,00\n– 526 480,02\nRural Development EAFRD (2014-2020) Investment - public beneficiaries\n2016\nSelection of the beneficiaries process does not prioritise in order to support only those that best fulfil the objectives of the RDP\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 34 620,08\n0,00\n– 34 620,08\nTotal FI:\nEUR\n– 1 195 009,76\n0,00\n– 1 195 009,76\nMember State\nMeasure\nFY\nReason\nType\nCorrection %\nCurrency\nAmount\nDeductions\nFinancial Impact\nFR\nCertification\n2014\nEAFRD financial error No 1\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 216,18\n0,00\n– 216,18\nCertification\n2014\nEAFRD financial error No 106\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 1 089,43\n0,00\n– 1 089,43\nCertification\n2014\nEAFRD financial error No 131\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 265,77\n– 25,45\n– 240,32\nCertification\n2014\nEAFRD financial error No 138\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 3 239,4\n0,00\n– 3 239,4\nCertification\n2014\nEAFRD financial error No 150\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 5,73\n0,00\n– 5,73\nCertification\n2014\nEAFRD financial error No 41\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 28 132,45\n0,00\n– 28 132,45\nCertification\n2014\nEAFRD financial error No 49\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 11,64\n– 1,12\n– 10,52\nCertification\n2014\nEAFRD financial error No 50\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 2 891,42\n– 276,81\n– 2 614,61\nCertification\n2014\nEAFRD financial error No 51\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 5 600,0\n– 536,11\n– 5 063,89\nCertification\n2014\nEAFRD financial error No 57\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 504,51\n– 48,30\n– 456,21\nCertification\n2014\nEAFRD financial error No 60\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 80 598,0\n0,00\n– 80 598,0\nRural Development EAFRD (2014-2020) measures subject to IACS\n2015\nICHN 2014 - Sufficient quality of on-the-spot controls - appropriate verification of the commitments - assessment of the livestock density during the on-the-spot checks\nESTIMATED BY AMOUNT\nEUR\n– 12 710 673,46\n– 8 651 399,66\n– 4 059 273,8\nCertification\n2014\nLack of diligence in recovery\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 833 708,09\n0,00\n– 833 708,09\nRural Development EAFRD (2014-2020) measures subject to IACS\n2015\nPHAE 2014 - Sufficient quality of on-the-spot controls - appropriate verification of the commitments - assessment of the livestock density during the on-the-spot checks\nESTIMATED BY AMOUNT\nEUR\n– 1 553 534,09\n– 1 553 534,09\n0,00\nTotal FR:\nEUR\n– 15 220 470,17\n– 10 205 821,54\n– 5 014 648,63\nMember State\nMeasure\nFY\nReason\nType\nCorrection %\nCurrency\nAmount\nDeductions\nFinancial Impact\nGB\nRural Development EAFRD Investment - private beneficiaries\n2014\nDeficiencies in verification of Reasonableness of costs (M123, M312) and in in-situ visits (M121, transitional measures)\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 325 626,46\n0,00\n– 325 626,46\nRural Development EAFRD (2014-2020) Investment - private beneficiaries\n2015\nDeficiencies in verification of Reasonableness of costs (M123, M312) and in in-situ visits (M121, transitional measures)\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 248 414,98\n0,00\n– 248 414,98\nRural Development EAFRD (2014-2020) forestry measures\n2016\nDeficiencies in verification of Reasonableness of costs (M123, M312) and in in-situ visits (M121, transitional measures)\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 3 342,25\n0,00\n– 3 342,25\nRural Development EAFRD (2014-2020) Investment - private beneficiaries\n2016\nDeficiencies in verification of Reasonableness of costs (M123, M312) and in in-situ visits (M121, transitional measures)\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 17 320,23\n0,00\n– 17 320,23\nRural Development EAFRD Leader\n2015\nEAFRD non-IACS: sample reviewed in the substantive testing (one-off financial correction)-RD programme 2007-2013\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 63 131,31\n0,00\n– 63 131,31\nTotal GB:\nEUR\n– 657 835,23\n0,00\n– 657 835,23\nMember State\nMeasure\nFY\nReason\nType\nCorrection %\nCurrency\nAmount\nDeductions\nFinancial Impact\nGR\nCertification\n2015\nEAFRD Non IACS - sample reviewed in the substantive testing (one-off financial correction)\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 99 353,26\n– 673,55\n– 98 679,71\nTotal GR:\nEUR\n– 99 353,26\n– 673,55\n– 98 679,71\nMember State\nMeasure\nFY\nReason\nType\nCorrection %\nCurrency\nAmount\nDeductions\nFinancial Impact\nHU\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 1 - Measures with flat rate support (2007-2013)\n2011\nDeficiencies in key control related to management and control of M142 - duration of support.\nESTIMATED BY AMOUNT\nEUR\n– 3 102 022,7\n0,00\n– 3 102 022,7\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 1 - Measures with flat rate support (2007-2013)\n2012\nDeficiencies in key control related to management and control of M142 - duration of support.\nESTIMATED BY AMOUNT\nEUR\n– 10 804 018,11\n0,00\n– 10 804 018,11\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 1 - Measures with flat rate support (2007-2013)\n2013\nDeficiencies in key control related to management and control of M142 - duration of support.\nESTIMATED BY AMOUNT\nEUR\n– 5 087 630,41\n0,00\n– 5 087 630,41\nRural Development EAFRD (2014-2020) Measures with flat-rate support\n2015\nDeficiencies in key control related to management and control of M142 - duration of support.\nESTIMATED BY AMOUNT\nEUR\n– 2 330 804,65\n0,00\n– 2 330 804,65\nRural Development EAFRD (2014-2020) Measures with flat-rate support\n2016\nDeficiencies in key control related to management and control of M142 - duration of support.\nESTIMATED BY AMOUNT\nEUR\n– 841 528,08\n0,00\n– 841 528,08\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 1 - Measures with flat rate support (2007-2013)\n2011\nDeficiencies in key control related to management and control of M142 - eligibility criteria\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 224 850,19\n– 155 101,14\n– 69 749,05\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 1 - Measures with flat rate support (2007-2013)\n2012\nDeficiencies in key control related to management and control of M142 - eligibility criteria\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 695 297,84\n– 540 200,91\n– 155 096,93\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 1 - Measures with flat rate support (2007-2013)\n2013\nDeficiencies in key control related to management and control of M142 - eligibility criteria\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 286 488,68\n– 254 381,52\n– 32 107,16\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 1 - Measures with flat rate support\n2014\nDeficiencies in key controls related to management and control of M142 - eligibility criteria\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 382 937,22\n– 295 655,73\n– 87 281,49\nRural Development EAFRD (2014-2020) Measures with flat-rate support\n2015\nDeficiencies in key controls related to management and control of M142 - eligibility criteria\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 156 267,78\n– 116 540,23\n– 39 727,55\nRural Development EAFRD (2014-2020) Measures with flat-rate support\n2016\nDeficiencies in key controls related to management and control of M142 - eligibility criteria\nFLAT RATE\n5,00 %\nEUR\n– 48 652,3\n– 42 076,4\n– 6 575,9\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 1 - Measures with flat rate support\n2014\ndeficiency in key control - duration of support\nESTIMATED BY AMOUNT\nEUR\n– 5 913 114,58\n0,00\n– 5 913 114,58\nTotal HU:\nEUR\n– 29 873 612,54\n– 1 403 955,93\n– 28 469 656,61\nMember State\nMeasure\nFY\nReason\nType\nCorrection %\nCurrency\nAmount\nDeductions\nFinancial Impact\nIT\nAccreditation Paying Agency\n2014\nAbsence of reperformance controls by Agea on EAFRD IACS\nFLAT RATE\n2,00 %\nEUR\n– 1 359 927,42\n0,00\n– 1 359 927,42\nAccreditation Paying Agency\n2015\nAbsence of reperformance controls by Agea on EAFRD IACS\nFLAT RATE\n2,00 %\nEUR\n– 5 767 406,83\n0,00\n– 5 767 406,83\nAccreditation Paying Agency\n2016\nAbsence of reperformance controls by Agea on EAFRD IACS\nFLAT RATE\n2,00 %\nEUR\n– 3 720 952,06\n0,00\n– 3 720 952,06\nAccreditation Paying Agency\n2007\nDebt Management: paper files prior to FY2010 not recorded in the system for EAFRD\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 218 915,6\n0,00\n– 218 915,6\nAccreditation Paying Agency\n2008\nDebt Management: paper files prior to FY2010 not recorded in the system for EAFRD\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 826 684,32\n0,00\n– 826 684,32\nAccreditation Paying Agency\n2009\nDebt Management: paper files prior to FY2010 not recorded in the system for EAFRD\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 589 631,9\n0,00\n– 589 631,9\nAccreditation Paying Agency\n2010\nDebt Management: paper files prior to FY2010 not recorded in the system for EAFRD\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 971 562,29\n0,00\n– 971 562,29\nRural Development EAFRD (2014-2020) Investment - private beneficiaries\n2015\nIneligible amounts (fraud) paid to beneficiary L.O. and other projects under M121 approved by the same inspector\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 1 071 801,22\n0,00\n– 1 071 801,22\nRural Development EAFRD (2014-2020) Measures with flat-rate support\n2015\nIneligible amounts (fraud) paid to beneficiary L.O. under M112\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 21 000,0\n0,00\n– 21 000,0\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 1+3 - Investment orientated measures (2007-2013)\n2011\nIneligible amounts paid for projects under M121\nFLAT RATE\n2,52 %\nEUR\n– 91 005,25\n– 91 005,25\n0,00\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 1+3 - Investment orientated measures (2007-2013)\n2012\nIneligible amounts paid for projects under M121\nFLAT RATE\n2,52 %\nEUR\n– 30 627,55\n– 30 627,55\n0,00\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 1+3 - Investment orientated measures (2007-2013)\n2013\nIneligible amounts paid for projects under M121\nFLAT RATE\n2,52 %\nEUR\n– 236 521,0\n– 236 521,0\n0,00\nRural Development EAFRD Investment - private beneficiaries\n2014\nIneligible amounts paid for projects under M121\nFLAT RATE\n2,52 %\nEUR\n– 21 659,14\n0,00\n– 21 659,14\nRural Development EAFRD (2014-2020) Investment - private beneficiaries\n2015\nIneligible amounts paid for projects under M121\nFLAT RATE\n2,52 %\nEUR\n– 514 365,17\n0,00\n– 514 365,17\nRural Development EAFRD (2014-2020) Investment - private beneficiaries\n2016\nIneligible amounts paid for projects under M121\nFLAT RATE\n2,52 %\nEUR\n– 514 416,77\n0,00\n– 514 416,77\nRural Development EAFRD (2014-2020) Investment - private beneficiaries\n2016\nIneligible amounts paid for transitional expenditure (follow up: projects under M121)\nFLAT RATE\n2,52 %\nEUR\n– 107 498,3\n0,00\n– 107 498,3\nRural Development EAFRD (2014-2020) Investment - private beneficiaries\n2017\nIneligible amounts paid for transitional expenditure (follow up: projects under M121)\nFLAT RATE\n2,52 %\nEUR\n– 164 372,47\n0,00\n– 164 372,47\nTotal IT:\nEUR\n– 16 228 347,29\n– 358 153,8\n– 15 870 193,49\nMember State\nMeasure\nFY\nReason\nType\nCorrection %\nCurrency\nAmount\nDeductions\nFinancial Impact\nRO\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, non area related measures)\n2014\nIncorrect payment rates - FY2014 - sub-measure 3a\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 818 013,62\n– 15 198,83\n– 802 814,79\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, non area related measures)\n2014\nIncorrect payment rates - FY2014 - sub-measure 3b\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 4 576 407,63\n0,00\n– 4 576 407,63\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, non area related measures)\n2014\nIncorrect payment rates - FY2014 - sub-measure 4b\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 9 560 314,82\n– 177 632,27\n– 9 382 682,55\nRural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, non area related measures)\n2014\nIncorrect payment rates - FY2014 - sub-measure 5a\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 1 727 302,8\n– 32 093,58\n– 1 695 209,22\nRural Development EAFRD (2014-2020) measures subject to IACS\n2015\nIncorrect payment rates - FY2015 - sub-measure 1a\nESTIMATED BY AMOUNT\nEUR\n– 5 533 253,66\n0,00\n– 5 533 253,66\nRural Development EAFRD (2014-2020) measures subject to IACS\n2015\nIncorrect payment rates - FY2015 - sub-measure 3a\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 1 588 178,57\n0,00\n– 1 588 178,57\nRural Development EAFRD (2014-2020) measures subject to IACS\n2015\nIncorrect payment rates - FY2015 - sub-measure 3b\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 4 489 089,72\n0,00\n– 4 489 089,72\nRural Development EAFRD (2014-2020) measures subject to IACS\n2015\nIncorrect payment rates - FY2015 - sub-measure 4b\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 10 657 012,37\n0,00\n– 10 657 012,37\nRural Development EAFRD (2014-2020) measures subject to IACS\n2015\nIncorrect payment rates - FY2015 - sub-measure 5a\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 2 969 317,38\n0,00\n– 2 969 317,38\nRural Development EAFRD (2014-2020) measures subject to IACS\n2016\nIncorrect payment rates - FY2016 - sub-measure 1a\nESTIMATED BY AMOUNT\nEUR\n– 7 651 592,95\n0,00\n– 7 651 592,95\nRural Development EAFRD (2014-2020) measures subject to IACS\n2016\nIncorrect payment rates - FY2016 - sub-measure 3a\nONE OFF\nEUR\n7 970,4\n0,00\n7 970,4\nRural Development EAFRD (2014-2020) measures subject to IACS\n2016\nIncorrect payment rates - FY2016 - sub-measure 3b\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 1 497,68\n0,00\n– 1 497,68\nRural Development EAFRD (2014-2020) measures subject to IACS\n2016\nIncorrect payment rates - FY2016 - sub-measure 4b\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 8 689 604,28\n0,00\n– 8 689 604,28\nRural Development EAFRD (2014-2020) measures subject to IACS\n2016\nIncorrect payment rates - FY2016 - sub-measure 5a\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 463 232,49\n0,00\n– 463 232,49\nCertification\n2014\nKnown error in EAFRD IACS\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 60 838,46\n– 304,19\n– 60 534,27\nCertification\n2014\nMLE EAFRD NON-IACS\nESTIMATED BY AMOUNT\nEUR\n– 13 424 095,76\n– 722 370,47\n– 12 701 725,29\nCertification\n2014\nMLE EARDF IACS\nESTIMATED BY AMOUNT\nEUR\n– 5 447 940,85\n– 7 258,11\n– 5 440 682,74\nRural Development EAFRD (2014-2020) Measures with flat-rate support\n2015\nweakness in a key control\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 100 833,0\n0,00\n– 100 833,0\nRural Development EAFRD (2014-2020) Measures with flat-rate support\n2016\nweakness in a key control\nONE OFF\nEUR\n– 64 467,0\n0,00\n– 64 467,0\nTotal RO:\nEUR\n– 77 815 022,64\n– 954 857,45\n– 76 860 165,19\nCurrency\nAmount\nDeductions\nFinancial Impact\nEUR\n– 150 587 585,19\n– 13 093 586,59\n– 137 493 998,6",
  "extent": "E+W+S+N.I.",
  "status": null,
  "version": "current",
  "annotations": [],
  "outstanding_effects": [],
  "provenance": {
    "source": "legislation.gov.uk",
    "source_url": "https://www.legislation.gov.uk/eudn/2018/873/annex/division/2",
    "retrieved_at": "2026-11-01T15:13:05.243040+00:00"
  },
  "licence": "Open Government Licence v3.0",
  "licence_url": "https://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/version/3/",
  "attribution": "Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Source: legislation.gov.uk, The National Archives."
}