OpenLegislation

Division (34) In their submission dated on 16 May 2018, the Romanian authorities did not deduct the current debt from the proceeds from liquidation in their simulation (in contrast to proceeds from the sale of Oltchim SPV). While this omission by the Romanian authorities seems to be erroneous, in case a MEO had considered that assumption, he would have found that the proceeds for the different pre-insolvency creditors in case of a liquidation would have been even higher than those in the table above, as shown below:

United Kingdom

Original text. Later amendments are not shown.

Liquidation procedure (if no pre-deduction of current debts)
Pessimistic scenarioEx-situ sale(million EUR) Central scenario(million EUR) Optimistic scenarioIn-situ sale(million EUR)
Gross proceeds (total)140216,9293,7

—

from secured assets (A)

108 171,1 234,2

—

from unencumbered assets (B)

32 45,8 59,5
Procedural costs (UNPIR) and security/preservation/asset administration costs(15,9)(18,4)(20,9)

—

on secured assets (C)

(13,2) (15,9) (18,5)

—

on unencumbered assets (D)

(2,7) (2,5) (2,4)
Claims from employees (paid before current debt) (E) from unencumbered assets(2,1)(2,1)(2,1)
Severance payments, start-up costs (F) (24,9) (26,2) (12,1)
Net proceeds:

—

from secured assets (Ω = A – C)

94,8 155,2 215,7

—

from unencumbered assets

(Φ = B – D – E – F)

1,1 13,2 40,6
Payment to creditors (other than employees)
Secured creditors (G), out of which: 94,8155,2195,8

—

AAAS's secured tranche

1 1,7 2,1

—

Electrica's secured tranche

21,4 35,7 44,2

—

Salrom

1,7 2,7 3,47
Budgetary, out of which: 1,113,260,5 (= Ω + Φ – G)

—

AAAS

1,0 12,4 56,6

—

Romanian Water Admin.

0,1 0,9 3,9
Unsecured creditors under Article 96 of the insolvency law, out of which 000
CET Govora 0 0 0
National Water Administration 0 0 0
Other unsecured creditors000
Salrom 0 0 0