Division 1 Listing Proposals
United Kingdom
| Whereby transformed wood is defined by HS code 44.09: Wood (including strips, friezes for parquet flooring, not assembled), continuously shaped (tongued, grooved, v‐jointed, beaded or the like) along any edges, ends or faces, whether or not planed, sanded or end-jointed.’ | |||||
| This term, as used in the CITES Appendices refers to product, shipped singly or in bulk, requiring No further processing, packaged, labelled for final use or the retail trade in a state fit for being sold to or used by the general public.’ | |||||
| No | Taxon / Detail | Proposal | Proponent | Comments | Position |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. | Capra falconeri heptneri (Heptner’s markhor) (population of Tajikistan) | I – II Transfer the population of Tajikistan from App. I to App. II | Tajikistan | Population seems to be increasing and hunting management under the CITES provisions for Appendix I species has generated revenues going back into the communities and conservation. However, the proposal does not contain strong evidence to demonstrate that the precautionary measures in Annex 4 of Res. Conf. 9.24 are satisfied. A downlisting would lead to increased volume of trade without guarantees that the revenues would be returned to conservation. IUCN recommended to continue and reinforce the current management. | – |
| 2. | Saiga tatarica (Saiga antelope) | II – I Transfer from App. II to App. I | Mongolia, United States of America | The proposal considers all recent Saiga to be one species, in line with the IUCN Red List. However, the currently valid CITES taxonomic reference separates the Mongolian populations as S. borealis. The Union will support the interpretation of the scope of the listing suggested by the US. If this interpretation is accepted, the CoP will consider listing of the two species S. borealis and S. tatarica. S. borealis meets the Appendix I listing criteria and the Union will support its listing in Appendix I. The Union will support listing in Appendix I of S. tatarica, provided that all principal range States agree with the listing, and only if S. borealis is listed in Appendix I as well. The Union will oppose the listing in Appendix I of S. tatarica if S. borealis is not uplisted as well, to avoid any negative impact on the population of S. borealis. | 0 |
| 3. | Vicugna vicugna (Vicuña) (population of the Province of Salta) | I – II Transfer the population of the Province of Salta (Argentina) from App. I to App. II with annotation 1 | Argentina | Since 2006, the population size is increasing considerably, population monitoring seems to be good and 41 % (14 000 km2) of the habitat is protected. The only form of planned utilisation is shearing of wild specimens. Consider jointly with working document no. 91. | + |
| 4. | Vicugna vicugna (Vicuña) (population of Chile) | Amend the name of the population of Chile from ‘population of the Primera Región’ to ‘populations of the region of Tarapacá and of the region of Arica and Parinacota’ | Chile | Support – the proposal does not contain any substantive change to the listing and only adjusts a geographical name. | + |
| 5. | Giraffa camelopardalis (Giraffe) | 0 – II Include in App. II | Central African Republic, Chad, Kenya, Mali, Niger and Senegal | The current conservation status of the nine subspecies and the presence and severity of main threats show large regional variations. Taking into account overall declines recorded over the last three generations and decreasing trends of the Giraffe population, an Appendix II listing has merits in preventing this species from becoming threatened in the future. Therefore, considering the precautionary approach and acting in the best interest of the conservation of the species, the listing in Appendix II is supported by the Union. | + |
| 6. | Aonyx cinereus (Small-clawed otter) | II – I Transfer from App. II to App. I | India, Nepal and the Philippines | According to IUCN, pet trade on the internet contributes to the recent rapid decline of the species. There are some indications that the level of this trade is growing in recent years. | + |
| 7. | Lutrogale perspicillata (Smooth-coated otter) | II – I Transfer from App. II to App. I | Bangladesh, India and Nepal | There are low levels of recorded legal international trade, but uplisting could help protect the species as the volume of illegal trade is significant. | + |
| 8. | Ceratotherium simum simum (Southern white rhinoceros) (population of Eswatini) | Remove the existing annotation for the population of Eswatini | Eswatini | Oppose. The population continues to meet App. II listing criteria, but removal of the annotation as proposed would not meet the precautionary safeguards set out in Para A. 2. a) in Annex 4 of Res. Conf. 9.24. Resumption of rhino horn trade would send the wrong signal at this point in time, given the high level of poaching and illegal trade. It would also undermine demand reduction action by many Parties for this species. | – |
| 9. | Ceratotherium simum simum (Southern white rhinoceros) (population of Namibia) | I – II Transfer of the population of Ceratotherium simum simum of Namibia from Appendix I to Appendix II with the following annotation:
| Namibia | The high levels of poaching and trafficking for this species remain of considerable concern for the Union. Successful conservation of the species in Namibia needs to be recognized, however, we should also note that more than a third part of the whole Namibian population was imported and two thirds belong to private owners, and the trade in hunting trophies and live animals for non-commercial purposes, to destinations suitably equipped to house and care for them, is already possible under Annex I. If the proposal is adopted by the CoP, the Union would request that it be accompanied by a set of decisions to monitor and report periodically on the possible impact of this downlisting. | (–) |
| 10. | Loxodonta africana (African elephant) | I – II Transfer the population of Zambia from Appendix I to Appendix II subject to:
| Zambia | The annotation suggested by Zambia would re-open international ivory trade and cannot be supported as it stands. | – |
| 11. | Loxodonta africana (African elephant) (populations of Botswana, Namibia, South Africa and Zimbabwe) Amendment of annotation 2 | Amendment of annotation 2:
| Botswana, Namibia and Zimbabwe | The requested change would result in opening up international ivory trade, and therefore does not meet the precautionary measures in Annex 4 to Res. Conf. 9.24 and is premature. | – |
| 12. | Loxodonta africana (African elephant) (populations of Botswana, Namibia, South Africa and Zimbabwe) | II – I Transfer the populations of Botswana, Namibia, South Africa and Zimbabwe from App. II to App. I | Burkina Faso, Côte d’Ivoire, Gabon, Kenya, Liberia, Niger, Nigeria, Sudan, Syrian Arab Republic and Togo | These four populations do not meet App. I criteria and the range States in question do not agree with the uplisting. | – |
| 13. | Mammuthus primigenius (Woolly mammoth) | 0 – II Include in App. II | Israel | The purpose of CITES is to protect species from overexploitation and extinction. Look-alike issues do not seem to be a sufficient argument for listing mammoth. Evidence for misidentification and laundering on a large scale has not been provided, and elephant and mammoth ivory dentine display unique characteristics which can be readily distinguished by a non-expert. Listing on App. II would not be proportionate with the scale of the risk posed (potentially generating numerous permits with no, or limited, conservation benefit). | – |
| 14. | Leporillus conditor (Greater stick-nest rat) | I – II Transfer from App. I to App. II | Australia | Transfer to Appendix II recommended by the AC. The species does not occur in international trade. | + |
| 15. | Pseudomys fieldi praeconis (Shark Bay mouse) | I – II Transfer from App. I to App. II | Australia | Transfer to Appendix II and a nomenclature change recommended by the AC. The species does not occur in international trade. | + |
| 16. | Xeromys myoides (False swamp rat) | I – II Transfer from App. I to App. II | Australia | Transfer to Appendix II recommended by the AC. The species does not occur in international trade. | + |
| 17. | Zyzomys pedunculatus (Central rock rat) | I – II Transfer from App. I to App. II | Australia | Transfer to Appendix II recommended by the AC. The species does not occur in international trade. | + |
| 18. | Syrmaticus reevesii (Reeves’s pheasant) | 0 – II Include in App. II | CN | Only the population of China meets the listing criteria for inclusion in Appendix II. Open to supporting the inclusion of the species in Appendix II, and will request the proponent to restrict the scope of the listing to the Chinese population only. | (+) |
| 19. | Balearica pavonina (Black crowned-crane) | II – I Transfer from App. II to App. I | Burkina Faso, Côte d’Ivoire and Senegal | As IUCN/TRAFFIC recognises, since the species is affected by international trade and the estimated population decline may be close to and could exceed 50 % over the last 45 years, B. pavonina is likely to meet the criteria for inclusion in Appendix I and the Union will support the proposal. | + |
| 20. | Dasyornis broadbenti litoralis (Lesser rufous bristlebird) | Transfer from App. I to App. II | Australia | The proposal results from the CITES Periodic Review and concerns a species that is not in trade (considered as extinct, last observation in 1906). | + |
| 21. | Dasyornis longirostris (Long-billed bristlebird) | I – II Transfer from App. I to App. II | Australia | The proposal results from the CITES Periodic Review and concerns a species that is not in trade. | + |
| 22. | Crocodylus acutus (American crocodile) (population of Mexico) | I – II Transfer the population of Mexico from App. I to App. II | Mexico | Support transfer from App. I to App. II if Mexico sets a 0 quota for specimens from the wild (source code W). | (+) |
| 23. | Calotes nigrilabris and Calotes pethiyagodai (Garden lizards) | 0 – I Include in App. I | Sri Lanka | Biological criteria for listing in CITES Appendices appear to be met but insufficient evidence to demonstrate that current or anticipated levels of trade are detrimental to its survival in the wild. The Union will encourage the proponent to list the two species in Appendix III, but oppose Appendix I listing. The Union is open to consider further information on listing in Appendix II if presented by the proponent. | (–) |
| 24. | Ceratophora spp. (Horned lizards) | 0 – I Include in App. I | Sri Lanka | Oppose the genus listing in Appendix I, but agree to include C. erdeleni, C. karu, and C. tennenti in Appendix I and C. stoddartii and C. aspera in Appendix II. Biological criteria for Appendix I are met for the three species (out of five species in the genus): C. karu, C. erdeleni and C. tennentii. Appendix II seems more warranted for C. aspera and C. stoddartii. The Union will consider on the spot any further information on the proposed listing if presented by the proponent. | (+) |
| 25. | Cophotis ceylanica and Cophotis dumbara (Pygmy lizards) | 0 – I Include in App. I | Sri Lanka | The proposal appears to meet biological criteria; offtakes of even small numbers may have a significant impact on remaining populations. These are the only two species in this genus, and both are endemic to Sri Lanka and listed as highly threatened on Sri Lanka’s National Red List (2012). | + |
| 26. | Lyriocephalus scutatus (Hump-nosed lizard) | 0 – I Include in App. I | Sri Lanka | Support an Appendix II listing, since Appendix I listing criteria are not met but App. II criteria are. | (–) |
| 27. | Goniurosaurus spp. (Leopard geckos) (populations of China and Vietnam) | 0 – II Include species of China and Vietnam in App. II | China, European Union, Vietnam | Co-proposed by the Union. | + |
| 28. | Gekko gecko (Tokay gecko) | 0 – II Include in App. II | European Union, India, Philippines, United States of America | Co-proposed by the Union. | + |
| 29. | Gonatodes daudini (Grenadines clawed gecko) | 0 – I Include in App. I | Saint Vincent and the Grenadines | The species meets the biological criteria for listing in Appendix I. International trade reported shortly after discovery of the species and still ongoing, even though collecting in the natural habitat is not allowed. | + |
| 30. | Paroedura androyensis (Grandidier’s Madagascar ground gecko) | 0 – II Include in App. II | European Union, Madagascar | Co-proposed by the Union. | + |
| 31. | Ctenosaura spp. (Spiny-tailed iguanas) | 0 – II Include in App. II | El Salvador and Mexico | The proposal meets the listing criteria; several species of the genus could become eligible for inclusion in Appendix I in the future if trade is not regulated as they have small populations, restricted areas of distribution or have experienced population declines, or a combination of these three criteria, and are highly vulnerable to either intrinsic or extrinsic factors. | + |
| 32. | Pseudocerastes urarachnoides (Spider-tailed horned viper) | 0 – II Include in App. II | Iran | More information needed to demonstrate that the trade criterion is met. There is limited information available in the proposal on the extent of collection from the wild and international trade of the species (with evidence of only a small handful of individuals appearing in trade outside of its range State), and although the species is classed as ‘nationally endangered’, there is a lack of data to indicate population size, distribution, or whether the species is in decline. | 0 |
| 33. | Cuora bourreti (Bourret’s box turtle) | II – I Transfer from App. II to App. I | Vietnam | Support transfer to App. I; a ‘critically endangered’ species that meets at least criterion C. i) in Annex 1 of Res. Conf. 9.24 and is heavily traded. | + |
| 34. | Cuora picturata (Vietnamese box turtle) | II – I Transfer from App. II to App. I | Vietnam | Support transfer to App.I; a ‘Critically Endangered’ species that meets all biological criteria of Res. Conf. 9.24 for Appendix I listing and is heavily traded. The proposal is arising from a Periodic Review recommendation. | + |
| 35. | Mauremys annamensis (Annam leaf turtle) | II – I Transfer from App. II to App. I | Vietnam | Support transfer to App. I; a ‘Critically Endangered’ species that it meets at least criterion C. i) in Annex 1 of Res. Conf. 9.24 and is heavily traded. The proposal is arising from a Periodic Review recommendation. | + |
| 36. | Geochelone elegans (Star tortoise) | II – I Transfer from App. II to App. I | Bangladesh, India, Senegal and Sri Lanka | The listing is proposed jointly by the majority of range States. The illegal trade is of great concern, although harvest and trade in wild specimens is already prohibited in the range States. The concerns around mis-use of source code C and potential laundering of wild specimens through captive breeding operations is already being addressed by CITES under Resolution Conf. 17.7. | + |
| 37. | Malacochersus tornieri (Pancake tortoise) | II – I Transfer from App. II to App. I | Kenya, United States of America | Support to the proposal. Most recent Red List Assessment (2018) has assessed the species as ‘Critically Endangered’. Proposal seems to be proportionate to the anticipated risks to the species, which is in considerable demand from the trade sector and affected by illegal trade. Overexploitation is reported as a main factor currently affecting populations of the species. The species seems to meet the Appendix I listing criteria. | + |
| 38. | Hyalinobatrachium spp., Centrolene spp., Cochranella spp., and Sachatamia spp. (Glass frogs) | 0 – II Include in App. II | Costa Rica, El Salvador | The Union could support a narrower proposal if the proponents decide to limit it to those species for which it can be demonstrated that they meet the listing criteria. However, due to lack of population data, and as reported trade occurs mostly in species of ‘Least Concern’, the inclusion in App. II of all 104 species belonging to four genera does not seem proportionate. Further information is needed on those species for which trade is most prevalent. | (–) |
| 39. | Echinotriton chinhaiensis and Echinotriton maxiquadratus (Spiny newts) | 0 – II Include in App. II | China | The species meet the biological criteria for listing in Appendix I. Their conservation would benefit from international protection. Even though international trade levels appear to be low, any trade in wild specimens could be detrimental to the survival of populations, as populations are extremely small and decreasing. Echinotriton has been split from Tylototriton (listing proposal No 41) only in 1982. Therefore, listing both genera is also appropriate on the basis of the look-alike criterion. | + |
| 40. | Paramesotriton spp. (Asian warty newts) | 0 – II Include in App. II | China, European Union | Co-proposed by the Union. | + |
| 41. | Tylototriton spp. (Crocodile newts) | 0 – II Include in App. II | China, European Union | Co-proposed by the Union. | + |
| 42. | Isurus oxyrinchus and Isurus paucus (Mako sharks) | 0 – II Include in App. II | Bangladesh, Benin, Bhutan, Brazil, Burkina Faso, Cabo Verde, Chad, Côte d’Ivoire, Dominican Republic, Egypt, European Union, Gabon, Gambia, Jordan, Lebanon, Liberia, Maldives, Mali, Mexico, Nepal, Niger, Nigeria, Palau, Samoa, Senegal, Sri Lanka, Sudan, Togo | Co-proposed by the Union. | + |
| 43. | Glaucostegus spp. (Guitarfishes) | 0 – II Include in App. II | Bangladesh, Benin, Bhutan, Brazil, Burkina Faso, Cabo Verde, Chad, Côte d’Ivoire, Egypt, European Union, Gabon, Gambia, Maldives, Mali, Mauritania, Monaco, Nepal, Niger, Nigeria, Palau, Senegal, Sierra Leone, Sri Lanka, Syrian Arab Republic, Togo, Ukraine | Co-proposed by the Union. | + |
| 44. | Rhinidae spp. (Wedgefishes) | 0 – II Include in App. II | Bangladesh, Benin, Bhutan, Brazil, Burkina Faso, Cabo Verde, Chad, Côte d’Ivoire, Egypt, Ethiopia, European Union, Fiji, Gabon, Gambia, India, Jordan, Kenya, Lebanon, Maldives, Mali, Mexico, Monaco, Nepal, Niger, Nigeria, Palau, Philippines, Saudi Arabia, Senegal, Seychelles, Sri Lanka, Sudan, Syrian Arab Republic, Togo and Ukraine | Co-proposed by the Union. | + |
| 45. | Holothuria (Microthele) fuscogilva, Holothuria (Microthele) nobilis, Holothuria (Microthele) whitmaei (Sea cucumbers) | 0 – II Include in App. II | European Union, Kenya, Senegal, Seychelles, United States of America | Co-proposed by the Union. | + |
| 46. | Poecilotheria spp. (Ornamental spiders) | 0 – II Include in App. II | Sri Lanka, United States of America | As there is insufficient evidence that international trade contributes significantly to the decline of the species, the Union will encourage the range State to list the species in Appendix III, but would not oppose the listing in Appendix II, if agreed by the CoP by consensus. The Union will consider any further information provided by the proponents on the spot. There could be difficulties in implementation with regard to identification of captive-bred specimens. | 0 |
| 47. | Achillides chikae hermeli (Mindoro peacock swallowtail) | 0 – I | European Union, Philippines | Co-proposed by the Union. | + |
| 48. | Parides burchellanus (Riverside swallowtail) | 0 – I Include in App. I | Brazil | Support the proposal. This species meets Appendix I listing criteria. The species occurs in trade numbers and, due to the small population size, any trade could be detrimental. | + |
| 49. | Handroanthus spp., Tabebuia spp. and Roseodendron spp. (Trumpet trees) | 0 – II Include in App. II with annotation #6 | Brazil | Proposal withdrawn. | n/a |
| 50. | Widdringtonia whytei (Mulanje Cedar) | 0 – II Include in App. II | Malawi | Oppose unless Malawi presents evidence of international trade detrimental to the conservation of the species. The species may benefit from an Appendix III listing instead. The EU would nonetheless not oppose the listing in Appendix II in case of consensus at the CoP 18. | (–) |
| 51. | Dalbergia sissoo (North Indian rosewood) | II – 0 Delete from App. II | Bangladesh, Bhutan, India and Nepal | The species is common and does not meet the biological criteria for App. II, but most likely still meets the look‐alike criterion of Res 9.24 (criterion A of Annex 2b). This proposal should also be seen in conjunction with proposed amendments to annotation #15. | – |
| 52. | Dalbergia spp., Guibourtia demeusei, Guibourtia pellegriniana, Guibourtia tessmannii (Rosewoods, Palisanders and Bubingas) Amendment of Annotation #15 | II – II Amend annotation #15 as follows:
| Canada, European Union | Co-proposed by the Union. | + |
| 53. | Pericopsis elata (African rosewood) Amendment of Annotation #5 | Expand the scope of the annotation for Pericopsis elata (currently #5) to include plywood and transformed wood as follows:
| Côte d’Ivoire, European Union | Co-proposed by the Union. | + |
| 54. | Pterocarpus tinctorius (African padauk) | 0 – II Include in App. II | Malawi | Support preferably with an annotation (potentially the new annotation as proposed for Pericopsis elata in Prop. 53). The species meets the biological criteria for listing in Appendix II as well as the trade criterion (exploitation is a significant threat to the conservation of the species, with illegal logging having boomed over recent years to meet the Asian demand). Inclusion in Appendix II would provide leverage to combat illegal trade. | (+) |
| 55. | Aloe ferox (Bitter aloe) Amendment of Annotation #4 | II – II
| South Africa | Support but propose draft decision(s) tasking the PC to monitor the impact of the proposed amendment and implementation of management measures. The criteria of Resolution 11.21 are met. | + |
| 56. | Adansonia grandidieri (Grandidier’s baobab) Amendment of Annotation #16 | II – II ‘Seeds, fruits, oils and living plants’ to the listing of Adansonia grandidieri in Appendix II by deleting reference to live plants, so as to read: ‘#16 Seeds, fruits and oils’ | Switzerland | Support. The criteria of Resolution 11.21 are met. | + |
| 57. | Cedrela spp. (Cedars) | 0 – II Include in App. II | Ecuador | Support only if an annotation is included in the proposal with a view to restricting CITES controls to those commodities that first appear in international trade as exports from range States (to be assessed and discussed with proponents whether e.g. the new annotation as proposed for Pericopsis elata in Prop. 53 would be appropriate). Invite Ecuador to consider restricting the scope of the proposal to the populations of the Neotropics. The taxon meets the biological as well as the trade criteria for listing in Appendix II. The Union is a minor importer worldwide. | (+) |
Annotations
Footnotes
- f1
-
Whereby transformed wood is defined by HS code 44.09: Wood (including strips, friezes for parquet flooring, not assembled), continuously shaped (tongued, grooved, v‐jointed, beaded or the like) along any edges, ends or faces, whether or not planed, sanded or end-jointed.’
- f2
-
This term, as used in the CITES Appendices refers to product, shipped singly or in bulk, requiring No further processing, packaged, labelled for final use or the retail trade in a state fit for being sold to or used by the general public.’