{
  "url": "https://openlegislation.uk/eu-directive-2012-27/annex-VIII/part-III/division-8",
  "json_url": "https://openlegislation.uk/eu-directive-2012-27/annex-VIII/part-III/division-8.json",
  "legislation": "eudr/2012/27",
  "legislation_title": "Directive 2012/27/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 October 2012 on energy efficiency, amending Directives 2009/125/EC and 2010/30/EU and repealing Directives 2004/8/EC and 2006/32/EC (Text with EEA relevance)",
  "legislation_url": "https://openlegislation.uk/eu-directive-2012-27",
  "path": "annex/VIII/part/III/division/8",
  "kind": "division",
  "number": "8",
  "heading": null,
  "text": "this analysis of economic potential shall include the following steps and considerations:\n(a) Considerations:\n(i) the cost-benefit analysis for the purposes of Article 14(3) shall include an economic analysis that takes into consideration socioeconomic and environmental factors , and a financial analysis performed to assess projects from the investors' point of view. Both economic and financial analyses shall use the net present value as criterion for the assessment;\n(ii) the baseline scenario should serve as a reference point and take into account existing policies at the time of compiling this comprehensive assessment , and be linked to data collected under Part I and point 6 of Part II of this Annex;\n(iii) alternative scenarios to the baseline shall take into account energy efficiency and renewable energy objectives of Regulation (EU) 2018/1999. Each scenario shall present the following elements compared to the baseline scenario:\neconomic potential of technologies examined using the net present value as criterion;\ngreenhouse gas emission reductions;\nprimary energy savings in GWh per year;\nimpact on the share of renewables in the national energy mix.\nScenarios that are not feasible due to technical reasons, financial reasons or national regulation may be excluded at an early stage of the cost-benefit analysis, if justified based on careful, explicit and well-documented considerations.\nThe assessment and decision-making should take into account costs and energy savings from the increased flexibility in energy supply and from a more optimal operation of the electricity networks, including avoided costs and savings from reduced infrastructure investment, in the analysed scenarios.\n(b) Costs and benefits\nThe costs and benefits referred to under point 8(a) shall include at least the following benefits and costs:\n(i) Benefits:\nvalue of output to the consumer (heating, cooling and electricity);\nexternal benefits such as environmental, greenhouse gas emissions and health and safety benefits, to the extent possible;\nlabour market effects, energy security and competitiveness, to the extent possible.\n(ii) Costs:\ncapital costs of plants and equipment;\ncapital costs of the associated energy networks;\nvariable and fixed operating costs;\nenergy costs;\nenvironmental, health and safety costs, to the extent possible;\nlabour market costs, energy security and competitiveness, to the extent possible.\n(c) Relevant scenarios to the baseline:\nAll relevant scenarios to the baseline shall be considered, including the role of efficient individual heating and cooling.\n(i) the cost-benefit analysis may either cover a project assessment or a group of projects for a broader local, regional or national assessment in order to establish the most cost-effective and beneficial heating or cooling solution against a baseline for a given geographical area for the purpose of planning;\n(ii) Member States shall designate the competent authorities responsible for carrying out the cost-benefit analyses pursuant to Article 14. They shall provide the detailed methodologies and assumptions in accordance with this Annex and establish and make public the procedures for the economic analysis.\n(d) Boundaries and integrated approach:\n(i) the geographical boundary shall cover a suitable well-defined geographical area;\n(ii) the cost-benefit analyses shall take into account all relevant centralised or decentralised supply resources available within the system and geographical boundary, including technologies considered under point 7 of Part III of this Annex, and heating and cooling demand trends and characteristics.\n(e) Assumptions:\n(i) Member States shall provide assumptions, for the purpose of the cost-benefit analyses, on the prices of major input and output factors and the discount rate;\n(ii) the discount rate used in the economic analysis to calculate net present value shall be chosen according to European or national guidelines;\n(iii) Member States shall use national, European or international energy price development forecasts if appropriate in their national and/or regional/local context;\n(iv) the prices used in the economic analysis shall reflect socio economic costs and benefits. External costs, such as environmental and health effects, should be included to the extent possible, i.e. when a market price exists or when it is already included in European or national regulation.\n(f) Sensitivity analysis:\n(i) a sensitivity analysis shall be included to assess the costs and benefits of a project or group of projects and be based on variable factors having a significant impact on the outcome of the calculations, such as different energy prices, levels of demand, discount rates and other.",
  "extent": "E+W+S+N.I.",
  "status": null,
  "version": "current",
  "annotations": [
    {
      "type": "F",
      "label": "F1",
      "text": "Substituted by Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2019/826 of 4 March 2019 amending Annexes VIII and IX to Directive 2012/27/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council on the contents of comprehensive assessments of the potential for efficient heating and cooling."
    },
    {
      "type": "footnote",
      "label": "f1",
      "text": "Including the assessment referred to in Article 15, paragraph 7 of Directive (EU) 2018/2001."
    },
    {
      "type": "footnote",
      "label": "f2",
      "text": "The cut-off date for taking into account policies for the baseline scenario is the end of the year preceding to the year by the end of which the comprehensive assessment is due. That is to say, policies enacted within a year prior to the deadline for submission of the comprehensive assessment do not need to be taken into account."
    }
  ],
  "outstanding_effects": [],
  "provenance": {
    "source": "legislation.gov.uk",
    "source_url": "https://www.legislation.gov.uk/eudr/2012/27/annex/VIII/part/III/division/8",
    "retrieved_at": "2026-11-01T15:21:56.755310+00:00"
  },
  "licence": "Open Government Licence v3.0",
  "licence_url": "https://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/version/3/",
  "attribution": "Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Source: legislation.gov.uk, The National Archives."
}