Division B Depending on the physical characteristics of the surfactant, one of the methods listed below may be used if appropriately justified . It should be noted that the pass criterion of at least 70 % of these methods is to be considered as equivalent to the pass criterion of at least 60 % referred to in methods listed in point A. The adequacy of the choice of the methods listed below shall be decided on a case-by-case confirmation, in accordance with Article 5 of this Regulation.F1
United Kingdom
F4...
Annotations
Textual amendments
- F1
- F2
Words in Annex 3 para. 1 substituted (31.12.2020) by The Detergents (Amendment) (EU Exit) Regulations 2019 (S.I. 2019/672), regs. 1, 25(3)(a); 2020 c. 1, Sch. 5 para. 1(1)
- F3
Words in Annex 3 para. 2 substituted (31.12.2020) by The Detergents (Amendment) (EU Exit) Regulations 2019 (S.I. 2019/672), regs. 1, 25(3)(b); 2020 c. 1, Sch. 5 para. 1(1)
- F4
Words in Annex 3 Pt. B omitted (31.12.2020) by virtue of The Detergents (Amendment) (EU Exit) Regulations 2019 (S.I. 2019/672), regs. 1, 25(3)(c); 2020 c. 1, Sch. 5 para. 1(1)
Footnotes
- f1
-
The DOC methods could give results on the removal and not on the ultimate biodegradation. The manometric respirometry and the MITI and two-phase BOD methods would not be appropriate in some cases because the high initial test concentration could be inhibitory.
Notes on the whole EU Regulation
Textual amendments
- F1
- F2