Annex III Evaluation criteria concerning studies, experiments
United Kingdom
The following seven criteria listed in the table below shall be applied by the Commission for the purpose of evaluating proposals for studies, experiments and demonstration projects and testing on the basis of a pilot phase included in the national programmes.
The range of points available for each question specifying the seven criteria and the elimination scores fore each questions are provided by the table below. If a proposal does not reach the minimum score for a question it shall be eliminated from the process.
| Criteria | Assessment range | Eliminatory score | Assessment points |
|---|---|---|---|
| Award CRITERIA | |||
| 1. Coherence of the project | 0 to 20 | Less than 9 | |
| Are the project objectives fully explained? Does the purpose of the project correspond with the monitoring issues addressed by Regulation (EC) No 2152/2003? Are the expected results explained? Is a clear and fully detailed explanation given of the action required? | |||
| 2. Planning | 0 to 10 | Less than 4 | |
| Is the planning realistic? | |||
| 3. Financial feasibility | 0 to 10 | Less than 4 | |
| Is the budgetary estimate realistic? | |||
| 4. Durability | 0 to 20 | Less than 15 | |
| May the action taken and the results have a lasting impact after the project is completed? | |||
| 5. General quality of presentation | 0 to 10 | / | |
| Is the project presented in a logical and well-argued manner? Is the proposal document well structured, clear and complete? | |||
| 6. Quality of the proposal | 0 to 20 | Less than 9 | |
| Evaluation of methodology and project set-up | |||
| 7. Community interest | 0-20 | / | |
| Does this project provide directly or indirectly provided added value at Community level? |