OpenLegislation

Division (Qualified opinion)X1

United Kingdom

Original text. Later amendments are not shown.

Based on the examination referred to above, it is my opinion that, for the abovementioned period, the management and control systems established for the programme … (name of operational programme, CCI code number, period) complied with the applicable requirements of Articles 58 to 62 of Council Regulation (EC) No 1083/2006 and Section 3 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1828/2006 and functioned effectively so as to provide reasonable assurance that statements of expenditure presented to the Commission are correct and, as a consequence, reasonable assurance that the underlying transactions are legal and regular, except in the following respects: … f1 .

My reasons for considering that this (these) aspect(s) of the systems did not comply with the requirements and/or did not operate in such a way as to give a reasonable assurance on the correctness of the statements of expenditure presented to the Commission are as follows … f2 .

I estimate the impact of the qualification(s) to be … of the total expenditure declared. The Community contribution affected is thus … .

Annotations

Editorial notes

X1

Substituted by Corrigendum to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1828/2006 of 8 December 2006 setting out rules for the implementation of Council Regulation (EC) No 1083/2006 laying down general provisions on the European Regional Development Fund, the European Social Fund and the Cohesion Fund and of Regulation (EC) No 1080/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the European Regional Development Fund (Official Journal of the European Union L 371 of 27 December 2006).

Footnotes

f1

Indicate the body or bodies and the aspect(s) of their systems that did not comply with requirements and/or did not operate effectively.

f2

Indicate for each body and each aspect of the system the reasons for the qualification.