OpenLegislation

Division 4.3.1.1 Performance criteriaF1

United Kingdom

Original text. Later amendments are not shown.

It is recommended that fully validated confirmatory methods (i.e. methods validated by collaborative trials for relevant matrices) are used where appropriate and available. Other suitable validated confirmatory methods (e.g. methods validated in-house on relevant matrices belonging to the commodity group of interest) may also be used provided they fulfil the performance criteria set out in the following tables.

Where possible, the validation of in-house validated methods shall include a certified reference material.

  1. (a)

    Performance criteria for aflatoxins

    Note:
    • Values to apply to both B 1 and sum of B 1 + B 2 + G 1 + G 2

    • If sum of individual aflatoxins B 1 + B 2 + G 1 + G 2 are to be reported, then response of each to the analytical system must be either known or equivalent.

    X1Criterion Concentration Range Recommended Value Maximum permitted Value
    Blanks All Negligible —
    Recovery — Aflatoxin M 1 0,01-0,05 μg/kg 60 to 120 %
    > 0,05 μg/kg 70 to 110 %
    Recovery — Aflatoxins B 1 , B 2 , G 1 , G 2 < 1,0 μg/kg 50 to 120 %
    1-10 μg/kg 70 to 110 %
    > 10 μg/kg 80 to 110 %
    Reproducibility RSD R All As derived from Horwitz Equation (*)(**) 2 × value derived from Horwitz Equation (*)(**)
    Repeatability RSD r may be calculated as 0,66 times Reproducibility RSD R at the concentration of interest.
  2. (b)

    Performance criteria for ochratoxin A

    Level μg/kg Ochratoxin A
    RSD r % RSD R % Recovery %
    < 1 ≤ 40 ≤ 60 50 to 120
    ≥ 1 ≤ 20 ≤ 30 70 to 110
  3. (c)

    Performance criteria for patulin

    Level μg/kg Patulin
    RSD r % RSD R % Recovery %
    < 20 ≤ 30 ≤ 40 50 to 120
    20-50 ≤ 20 ≤ 30 70 to 105
    > 50 ≤ 15 ≤ 25 75 to 105
  4. (d)

    Performance criteria for deoxynivalenol

    Level μg/kg Deoxynivalenol
    RSD r % RSD R % Recovery %
    > 100-≤ 500 ≤ 20 ≤ 40 60 to 110
    > 500 ≤ 20 ≤ 40 70 to 120
  5. (e)

    Performance criteria for zearalenone

    Level μg/kg Zearalenone
    RSD r % RSD R % Recovery %
    ≤ 50 ≤ 40 ≤ 50 60 to 120
    > 50 ≤ 25 ≤ 40 70 to 120
  6. (f)

    Performance criteria for Fumonisin B 1 and B 2 individually

    Level μg/kg Fumonisin B 1 and B 2 individually
    RSD r % RSD R % Recovery %
    ≤ 500 ≤ 30 ≤ 60 60 to 120
    > 500 ≤ 20 ≤ 30 70 to 110
  7. (g)

    Performance criteria for T-2 and HT-2 toxin individually

    Level μg/kg T-2 and HT-2 toxin individually
    RSD r % RSD R % Recovery %
    15-250 ≤ 30 ≤ 50 60 to 130
    > 250 ≤ 25 ≤ 40 60 to 130
  8. (h)

    Performance criteria for citrinin

    Level μg/kg Citrinin
    RSD r % Recommended RSD R % Maximum allowed RSD R % Recovery %
    All 0,66 × RSD R As derived from Horwitz Equation (*) (**) 2 × value derived from Horwitz Equation (*) (**) 70 to 120
  9. (i)

    Notes to the performance criteria for the mycotoxins:

    • The detection limits of the methods used are not stated as the precision values given at the concentrations of interest.

    • The precision values are calculated from the Horwitz equation, in particular the original Horwitz equation (for concentrations 1,2 × 10 –7 ≤ C ≤ 0,138) (*) and the modified Horwitz equation (for concentrations C < 1,2 × 10 –7 ) (**).

      1. (*)

        Horwitz equation for concentrations 1,2 × 10 –7 ≤ C ≤ 0,138:

        RSD R = 2 (1-0.5logC)

        (ref: W. Horwitz, L.R. Kamps, K.W. Boyer, J.Assoc.Off.Analy.Chem.,1980, 63, 1344)

      2. (**)

        Modified Horwitz equation (*) for concentrations C < 1,2 × 10 –7 :

        RSD R = 22 %

        (ref: M. Thompson, Analyst, 2000, 125, p. 385-386)

        Where:

        • RSD R is the relative standard deviation calculated from results generated under reproducibility conditions [(sR/) × 100]

        • C is the concentration ratio (i.e. 1 = 100g/100g, 0,001 = 1 000 mg/kg)

        This is a generalised precision equation which has been found to be independent of analyte and matrix but solely dependent on concentration for most routine methods of analysis.

Annotations

Textual amendments

F1

Substituted by Commission Regulation (EU) No 519/2014 of 16 May 2014 amending Regulation (EC) No 401/2006 as regards methods of sampling of large lots, spices and food supplements, performance criteria for T-2, HT-2 toxin and citrinin and screening methods of analysis (Text with EEA relevance).

Editorial notes

X1

Substituted by Corrigendum to Commission Regulation (EU) No 519/2014 of 16 May 2014 amending Regulation (EC) No 401/2006 as regards methods of sampling of large lots, spices and food supplements, performance criteria for T-2, HT-2 toxin and citrinin and screening methods of analysis (Official Journal of the European Union L 147 of 17 May 2014).