{
  "url": "https://openlegislation.uk/eu-regulation-2018-1832/annex-II",
  "json_url": "https://openlegislation.uk/eu-regulation-2018-1832/annex-II.json",
  "legislation": "eur/2018/1832",
  "legislation_title": "Commission Regulation (EU) 2018/1832 of 5 November 2018 amending Directive 2007/46/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council, Commission Regulation (EC) No 692/2008 and Commission Regulation (EU) 2017/1151 for the purpose of improving the emission type approval tests and procedures for light passenger and commercial vehicles, including those for in-service conformity and real-driving emissions and introducing devices for monitoring the consumption of fuel and electric energy (Text with EEA relevance)",
  "legislation_url": "https://openlegislation.uk/eu-regulation-2018-1832",
  "path": "annex/II",
  "kind": "annex",
  "number": "II",
  "heading": null,
  "text": "Annex II to Regulation (EU) 2017/1151 is amended as follows:\n(1) The following text is inserted after the title:\n‘PART A’\n(2) Point 1.1. is replaced by the following:\n‘1.1.\nThis Part shall apply to M and N1 class I vehicles based on types approved until 31 December 2018 and registered until 31 August 2019 and to N1 classes II and III and N2 vehicles based on types approved until 31 August 2019 and registered until 31 August 2020’;\n(3) Point 2.10. is replaced with the following:\n‘2.10.\nIn paragraph 3.2.1., paragraph 4.2. and footnotes 1 and 2 of Appendix 4 to UN/ECE Regulation No 83, the reference to the limit values given in Table 1 of paragraph 5.3.1.4. shall be understood as reference to Table 2 of Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 715/2007.’;\n(4) The following is added:\n‘PART B\nNEW IN-SERVICE CONFORMITY METHODOLOGY\n1.\nIntroduction\nThis Part shall apply to M and N1 class I vehicles based on types approved after 1 January 2019 and to all vehicles registered after 1 September 2019 and to N1 classes II and III and N2 vehicles based on types approved after 1 September 2019 and registered after 1 September 2020.\nIt sets out the in-service conformity (ISC) requirements for checking compliance against the emission limits for tailpipe (including low temperature) and evaporative emissions throughout the normal life of the vehicle up to five years or 100 000 km, whichever is sooner.\n2.\nProcess description\nFigure B.1\nIllustration of the in-service conformity process (where GTAA refers to the granting type approval authority and OEM refers to the manufacturer)\n3.\nISC family definition\nAn ISC family shall be composed of the following vehicles:\n(a) For tailpipe emissions (Type 1 and Type 6 tests), the vehicles covered by the PEMS test family, as described in Appendix 7 of Annex IIIA,\n(b) For evaporative emissions (Type 4 test), the vehicles included in the evaporative emission family, as described in Point 5.5 of Annex VI.\n4.\nInformation gathering and initial risk assessment\nThe granting type approval authority shall gather all relevant information on possible emission non-compliances relevant for deciding which ISC families to check in a particular year. The granting type-approval authority shall take into account in particular information indicating vehicle types with high emissions in real driving conditions. That information shall be obtained through the use of appropriate methods, which may include remote sensing, simplified on-board emissions monitoring systems (SEMS) and testing with PEMS. The number and importance of exceedances observed during such testing may be used to prioritise ISC testing.\nAs part of the information provided for the ISC checks, each manufacturer shall report to the granting type approval authority on emission-related warranty claims, and any emission-related warranty repair works performed or recorded during servicing, in accordance with a format agreed between the granting type approval authority and the manufacturer at type approval. The information shall detail the frequency and nature of faults for emissions-related components and systems by ISC family. The reports shall be filed at least once a year for each vehicle ISC family for the duration of the period during which in-service conformity checks are to be performed in accordance with Article 9(3).\nOn the basis of the information referred to in the first and second paragraphs, the granting type approval authority shall make an initial assessment of the risk of an ISC family to not comply with the in-service conformity rules and on that basis shall take a decision on which families to test and which types of tests to perform under the ISC provisions. Additionally, the granting type approval authority may randomly choose ISC families to test.\n5.\nISC testing\nThe manufacturer shall perform ISC testing for tailpipe emissions comprising at least the Type 1 test for all ISC families. The manufacturer may also perform RDE, Type 4 and Type 6 tests for all or part of the ISC families. The manufacturer shall report to the granting type approval authority all results of the ISC testing using the Electronic Platform for in-service conformity described in point 5.9.\nThe granting type approval authority shall check an appropriate number of ISC families each year, as set out in point 5.4. The granting type approval authority shall include all results of the ISC testing in the Electronic Platform for in-service conformity described in point 5.9.\nAccredited laboratories or technical services may perform checks on any number of ISC families each year. The accredited laboratories or technical services shall report to the granting type approval authority all results of the ISC testing using the Electronic Platform for in-service conformity described in point 5.9.\n5.1.\nQuality assurance of testing\nInspection bodies and laboratories performing ISC checks, that are not a designated technical service, shall be accredited according to EN ISO/IEC 17020:2012 for the ISC procedure. Laboratories performing ISC tests and which are not designated technical services within the meaning of Article 41 of Directive 2007/46, may only undertake ISC testing if they are accredited according to EN ISO/IEC 17025:2017.\nThe granting type approval authority shall annually audit the ISC checks performed by the manufacturer. The granting type approval authority may also audit the ISC checks performed by accredited laboratories and technical services. The audit shall be based on the information provided by the manufacturers, accredited laboratory or technical service which shall include at least the detailed ISC report in accordance with Appendix 3. The granting type approval authority may require the manufacturers, accredited laboratories or technical services to provide additional information.\n5.2.\nDisclosure of tests results by accredited laboratories and technical services\nThe granting type approval authority shall communicate the results of the compliance assessment and remedial measures for a particular ISC family to the accredited laboratories or technical services which provided test results for that family as soon as they become available.\nThe results of the tests, including the detailed data for all vehicles tested, may only be disclosed to the public after the publication by the granting type approval authority of the annual report or the results of an individual ISC procedure or after the closure of the statistical procedure (see point 5.10.) without a result. If the results of the ISC tests are published, reference shall be made to the annual report by the granting type approval authority which included them.\n5.3.\nTypes of tests\nISC testing shall only be performed on vehicles selected in accordance with Appendix 1.\nISC testing with the Type 1 test shall be performed in accordance with Annex XXI.\nISC testing with the RDE tests shall be performed in accordance with Annex IIIA, Type 4 tests shall be performed in accordance with Appendix 2 to this Annex and Type 6 tests shall be performed in accordance with Annex VIII.\n5.4.\nFrequency and scope of ISC testing\nThe time period between commencing two in-service conformity checks by the manufacturer for a given ISC family shall not exceed 24 months.\nThe frequency of ISC testing performed by the granting type approval authority shall be based on a risk assessment methodology consistent with the international standard ISO 31000:2018 — Risk Management — Principles and guidelines which shall include the results of the initial assessment made according to point 4.\nAs of 1 January 2020, granting type approval authorities shall perform the Type 1 and RDE tests on a minimum of 5 % of the ISC families per manufacturer per year or at least two ISC families per manufacturer per year, where available. The requirement for testing a minimum of 5 % or at least two ISC families per manufacturer per year shall not apply to small volume manufacturers. The granting type approval authority shall ensure the widest possible coverage of ISC families and vehicle age in a particular in-service conformity family in order to ensure compliance according to Article 8, paragraph 3. The granting type approval authority shall complete the statistical procedure for each ISC family it has started within 12 months.\nType 4 or Type 6 ISC tests shall have no minimum frequency requirements.\n5.5.\nFunding for ISC testing by the granting type approval authorities\nThe granting type approval authority shall ensure that sufficient resources are available to cover the costs for in-service conformity testing. Without prejudice to national law, those costs shall be recovered by fees that can be levied on the manufacturer by the granting type approval authority. Such fees shall cover ISC testing of up to 5 % of the in-service conformity families per manufacturer per year or at least two ISC families per manufacturer per year.\n5.6.\nTesting plan\nWhen performing RDE testing for ISC, the granting type approval authority shall draft a testing plan. That plan shall include testing to check ISC compliance under a wide range of conditions in accordance with Annex IIIA.\n5.7.\nSelection of vehicles for ISC testing\nThe information gathered shall be sufficiently comprehensive to ensure that in-service performance can be assessed for vehicles that are properly maintained and used. The tables in Appendix 1 shall be used to decide whether the vehicle can be selected for the purposes of ISC testing. During the check against the tables in Appendix 1, some vehicles may be declared as faulty and not tested during ISC, when there is evidence that parts of the emission control system were damaged.\nThe same vehicle may be used to perform and establish reports from more than one type of tests (Type 1, RDE, Type 4, Type 6) but only the first valid test of each type shall be taken into account for the statistical procedure.\n5.7.1.\nGeneral requirements\nThe vehicle shall belong to an ISC family as described in point 3 and shall comply with the checks set out in the table in Appendix 1. It shall be registered in the Union and have been driven in the Union for at least 90 % of its driving time. The emissions testing may be done in a different geographical region from that where the vehicles have been selected.\nThe vehicles selected shall be accompanied by a maintenance record which shows that the vehicle has been properly maintained and has been serviced in accordance with the manufacturer's recommendations with only original parts used for the replacement of emissions related parts.\nVehicles exhibiting indications of abuse, improper use that could affect its emissions performance, tampering or conditions that may lead to unsafe operation shall be excluded from ISC.\nThe vehicles shall not have undergone aerodynamic modifications that cannot be removed prior to testing.\nA vehicle shall be excluded from ISC testing if the information stored in the on-board computer shows that the vehicle was operated after a fault code was displayed and a repair was not carried out in accordance with manufacturer specifications.\nA vehicle shall be excluded from ISC testing if the fuel from the vehicle tank does not meet the applicable standards laid down in Directive 98/70/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council or if there is evidence or record of fuelling with the wrong type of fuel.\n5.7.2.\nVehicle Examination and Maintenance\nDiagnosis of faults and any normal maintenance necessary in accordance with Appendix 1 shall be performed on vehicles accepted for testing, prior to or after proceeding with ISC testing.\nThe following checks shall be carried out: OBD checks (performed before or after the test), visual checks for lit malfunction indicator lamps, checks on air filter, all drive belts, all fluid levels, radiator and fuel filler cap, all vacuum and fuel system hoses and electrical wiring related to the after-treatment system for integrity; checks on ignition, fuel metering and pollution control device components for maladjustments and/or tampering.\nIf the vehicle is within 800 km of a scheduled maintenance service, that service shall be performed.\nThe window washer fluid shall be removed before the Type 4 test and replaced with hot water.\nA fuel sample shall be collected and kept in accordance with the requirements of Annex IIIA for further analysis in case of fail.\nAll faults shall be recorded. When the fault is on the pollution control devices then the vehicle shall be reported as faulty and not be used further for testing, but the fault shall be taken into account for the purposes of the compliance assessment performed in accordance with point 6.1.\n5.8.\nSample size\nWhen manufacturers apply the statistical procedure set out in point 5.10 for the Type 1 test, the number of sample lots shall be set on the basis of the annual sales volume of an in-service family in the Union, as described in the following table:\nTable B.1\nNumber of sample lots for ISC testing with Type 1 tests\nEU Registrations per calendar year of vehicles in the sampling period\nNumber of sample lots(for Type 1 tests)\nup to 100 000\n1\n100 001 to 200 000\n2\nabove 200 000\n3\nEach sample lot shall include enough vehicle types, in order to ensure that at least 20 % of the total family sales are covered. When a family requires more than one sample lot to be tested, the vehicles in the second and third sample lots shall reflect different vehicle use conditions from those selected for the first sample.\n5.9.\nUse of the Electronic Platform for in-service conformity and access to data required for testing\nThe Commission shall set up an electronic platform in order to facilitate the exchange of data between on the one side, the manufacturers, accredited labs or technical services and on the other side the granting type approval authority and the taking of the decision on the sample fail or pass.\nThe manufacturer shall complete the package on Testing Transparency referred to in Article 5 (12) in the format specified in Tables 1 and 2 of Appendix 5 and in the Table in this point and transmit it to the type-approval authority which grants the emission type-approval. Table 2 of Appendix 5 shall be used in order to allow the selection of vehicles from the same family for testing and along with the Table 1 provide sufficient information for vehicles to be tested.\nOnce the electronic platform referred to in the first paragraph becomes available, the type-approval authority which grants the emission type-approval shall upload the information in Tables 1 and 2 of Appendix 5 to this platform within 5 working days of receiving it.\nAll information in Tables 1 and 2 of Appendix 5 shall be accessible to the public in an electronic form free of charge.\nThe following information shall also be part of the package on Testing Transparency and shall be provided by the manufacturer free-of-charge within 5 working days of the request by an accredited laboratory or technical service.\nID\nInput\nDescription\n1.\nSpecial Procedure for conversion of vehicles (4WD to 2WD) for dyno testing if available\nAs defined in Sub-Annex 6 of Annex XXI; point 2.4.2.4.\n2.\nDyno mode instructions, if available\nHow to enable the dyno mode as done also during TA tests\n3.\nCoastdown mode used during the TA tests\nIf the vehicle has coastdown mode instructions how to enable this mode\n4.\nBattery discharge procedure (OVC-HEV, PEV)\nOEM procedure to deplete battery for preparing OVC-HEV for charge sustaining tests, and PEV to charge the battery\n5.\nProcedure to deactivate all auxiliaries\nIf used during TA\n5.10.\nStatistical Procedure\n5.10.1.\nGeneral\nThe verification of in-service conformity shall rely on a statistical method following the general principles of sequential sampling for inspection by attributes. The minimum sample size for a pass result is three vehicles, and the maximum cumulative sample size is ten vehicles for the Type 1 and RDE tests.\nFor the Type 4 and Type 6 tests a simplified method may be used, where the sample shall consist of three vehicles and shall be considered a fail if all three vehicles fail to pass the test, and a pass if all three vehicles pass the test. In cases where two out of three passed or failed, the type approval authority may decide to conduct further tests or proceed with accessing the compliance in accordance with point 6.1.\nTest results shall not be multiplied by deterioration factors.\nFor vehicles that have a Declared Maximum RDE Values reported in point 48.2 of the Certificate of Conformity, as described in Annex IX of Directive 2007/46/EC which is lower than the emission limits set out in Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 715/2007, the conformity shall be checked both against the Declared Maximum RDE Value increased by the margin set out in point 2.1.1 of Annex IIIA and the not-to-exceed limit set out in in section 2.1. of that Annex. If the sample is found not to conform with the Declared Maximum RDE Values increased by the applicable measurement uncertainty margin, but pass with the not-to-exceed limit, the granting type approval authority shall require the manufacturer to take corrective actions.\nPrior to the performance of the first ISC test, the manufacturer, accredited laboratory or technical service (“party”) shall notify the intent of performing in-service conformity testing of a given vehicle family to the granting type approval authority. Upon this notification, the granting type approval authority shall open a new statistical folder to process the results for each relevant combination of the following parameters for that particular party/or that pool of parties: vehicle family, emissions test type and pollutant. Separate statistical procedures shall be opened for each relevant combination of those parameters.\nThe granting type approval authority shall incorporate in each statistical folder only the results provided by the relevant party. The granting type approval authority shall keep a record of the number of tests performed, the number of failed and passed tests and other necessary data to support the statistical procedure.\nWhereas more than one statistical procedure can be open at the same time for a given combination of test type and vehicle family, a party shall only be allowed to provide test results to one open statistical procedure for a given combination of test type and vehicle family. Each test shall be reported only once and all tests (valid, not valid, fail or pass, etc.) shall be reported.\nEach ISC statistical procedure shall remain open until an outcome is reached when the statistical procedure arrives to a pass or fail decision for the sample in accordance point 5.10.5. However, if an outcome is not reached within 12 months of the opening of a statistical folder, the granting type approval authority shall close the statistical folder unless it decides to complete testing for that statistical folder within the following 6 months.\n5.10.2.\nPooling of ISC results\nTest results from two or more accredited laboratories or technical services may be pooled for the purposes of a common statistical procedure. The pooling of test results shall require the written consent from all the interested parties providing test results to a pool of results, and a notification to the granting type approval authority prior to the start of testing. One of the parties pooling test results shall be designated as leader of the pool and be responsible for data reporting and communication with the granting type approval authority.\n5.10.3.\nPass/Fail/Invalid outcome for a single test\nAn ISC emissions test shall be considered as ‘passed’ for one or more pollutants when the emissions result is equal or below the emission limit set out in Annex I of Regulation (EC) No 715/2007 for that type of test.\nAn emissions test shall be considered as ‘failed’ for one or more pollutants when the emissions result is greater than the corresponding emission limit for that type of test. Each failed test result shall increase the ‘f’ count (see point 5.10.5) by 1 for that statistical instance.\nAn ISC emissions test shall be considered invalid if it does not respect the test requirements referred to in point 5.3. Invalid test results shall be excluded from the statistical procedure.\nThe results of all ISC tests shall be submitted to the granting type approval authority within ten working days from the execution of each test. The test results shall be accompanied by a comprehensive test report at the end of the tests. The results shall be incorporated in the sample in chronological order of execution.\nThe granting type approval authority shall incorporate all valid emission test results to the relevant open statistical procedure until a ‘sample fail’ or a ‘sample pass’ outcome is reached in accordance with point 5.10.5.\n5.10.4.\nTreatment of Outliers\nThe presence of outlying results in the sample statistical procedure may lead to a ‘fail’ outcome in accordance with the procedures described below:\nOutliers shall be categorised as intermediate or extreme.\nAn emissions test result shall be considered as an intermediate outlier if it is equal or greater than 1,3 times the applicable emission limit. The presence of two such outliers in a sample shall lead to a fail of the sample.\nAn emissions result shall be considered as an extreme outlier if it is equal or greater than 2,5 times the applicable emission limit. The presence of one such outlier in a sample shall lead to a fail of the sample. In such case, the plate number of the vehicle shall be communicated to the manufacturer and to the granting type approval authority. This possibility shall be communicated to the vehicle owners before testing.\n5.10.5.\nPass/Fail decision for a sample\nFor the purposes of deciding on a pass/fail result for the sample, ‘p’ is the count of passed results, and ‘f’ is the count of failed results. Each passed test result shall increase the ‘p’ count by 1 and each failed test result shall increase the ‘f’ count by 1 for the relevant open statistical procedure.\nUpon the incorporation of valid emission test results to an open instance of the statistical procedure, the type approval authority shall perform the following actions:\nupdate the cumulative sample size ‘n’ for that instance to reflect the total number of valid emissions tests incorporated to the statistical procedure;\nfollowing an evaluation of the results, update the count of passed results ‘p’ and the count of failed results ‘f’;\ncompute the number of extreme and intermediate outliers in the sample in accordance with point 5.10.4.\ncheck whether a decision is reached with the procedure described below.\nThe decision depends on the cumulative sample size ‘n’, the passed and failed result counts ‘p’ and ‘f’, as well as the number of intermediate and/or extreme outliers in the sample. For the decision on a pass/fail of an ISC sample the granting type approval authority shall use the decision chart in Figure B.2 for vehicles based on types approved as of 1 January 2020 and the decision chart in Figure B.2.a for vehicles based on types approved until 31 December 2019. The charts indicate the decision to be taken for a given cumulative sample size ‘n’ and failed count result ‘f’.\nTwo decisions are possible for a statistical procedure for a given combination of vehicle family, emissions test type and pollutant:\n‘Sample pass’ outcome shall be reached when the applicable decision chart from Figure B.2 or Figure B.2.a gives a “PASS” outcome for the current cumulative sample size ‘n’ and the count of failed results ‘f’.\n‘Sample fail’ decision shall be reached when, for a given cumulative sample size ‘n’, when at least one of the following conditions is fulfilled:\nthe applicable decision chart from Figure B.2 or Figure B.2.a gives a “FAIL” decision for the current cumulative sample size ‘n’ and the count of failed results ‘f’.\nthere are two intermediate outliers;\nthere is one extreme outlier.\nIf no decision is reached, the statistical procedure shall remain open and further results shall be incorporated into it until a decision is reached or the procedure is closed in accordance with point 5.10.1.\nFigure B.2\nDecision chart for the statistical procedure for vehicles based on types approved as of 1 January 2020 (where ‘UND’ means undecided)\nFailed result count f\n10\nFAIL\n9\nFAIL\nFAIL\n8\nFAIL\nFAIL\nFAIL\n7\nFAIL\nFAIL\nFAIL\nFAIL\n6\nFAIL\nFAIL\nFAIL\nFAIL\nFAIL\n5\nFAIL\nFAIL\nFAIL\nUND\nUND\nPASS\n4\nFAIL\nFAIL\nUND\nUND\nUND\nUND\nPASS\n3\nFAIL\nFAIL\nUND\nUND\nUND\nUND\nPASS\nPASS\n2\nUND\nUND\nUND\nUND\nPASS\nPASS\nPASS\nPASS\n1\nUND\nPASS\nPASS\nPASS\nPASS\nPASS\nPASS\nPASS\n0\nPASS\nPASS\nPASS\nPASS\nPASS\nPASS\nPASS\nPASS\n3\n4\n5\n6\n7\n8\n9\n10\nCumulative sample size n\nFigure B.2.a\nDecision chart for the statistical procedure for vehicles type approved until 31 December 2019 (where ‘UND’ means undecided)\nFailed result count f\n10\nFAIL\n9\nFAIL\nFAIL\n8\nFAIL\nFAIL\nFAIL\n7\nFAIL\nFAIL\nFAIL\nFAIL\n6\nFAIL\nFAIL\nFAIL\nFAIL\nFAIL\n5\nFAIL\nUND\nUND\nUND\nUND\nPASS\n4\nUND\nUND\nUND\nUND\nUND\nPASS\nPASS\n3\nUND\nUND\nUND\nUND\nUND\nPASS\nPASS\nPASS\n2\nUND\nUND\nUND\nPASS\nPASS\nPASS\nPASS\nPASS\n1\nUND\nPASS\nPASS\nPASS\nPASS\nPASS\nPASS\nPASS\n0\nPASS\nPASS\nPASS\nPASS\nPASS\nPASS\nPASS\nPASS\n3\n4\n5\n6\n7\n8\n9\n10\nCumulative sample size n\n5.10.6.\nISC for completed vehicles and special purpose vehicles\nThe manufacturer of the base vehicle shall determine the allowed values for the parameters listed in Table B.3. The allowed Parameter Values for each family shall be recorded in the information document of the emissions type approval (see Appendix 3 to Annex I) and in the Transparency list 1 of Appendix 5 (rows 45 to 48). The second-stage manufacturer shall only be allowed to use the base vehicle emission values if the completed vehicle remains within the allowed Parameter Values. The parameter values for each completed vehicle shall be recorded in its Certificate of Conformity.\nTable B.3\nAllowed Parameter Values for multistage and special purpose vehicles to use the base vehicle emission type approval\nParameter Values:\nAllowed values from - to:\nFinal Vehicle mass in running order (in kg)\nFrontal area for final vehicle (in cm2)\nRolling resistance (kg/t)\nProjected frontal area of air entrance of the front grille (in cm2)\nIf a completed or special purpose vehicle is tested and the result of the test is below the applicable emission limit, the vehicle shall be considered as a pass for the ISC family for the purposes of point 5.10.3.\nIf the result of the test on a completed or special purpose vehicle exceeds the applicable emission limits but is not higher than 1,3 times the applicable emission limits, the tester shall examine whether that vehicle complies with the values in table B.3. Any non-compliance with these values shall be reported to the granting type approval authority. If the vehicle does not comply with those values, the granting type approval authority shall investigate the reasons for the non-compliance and take the appropriate measures regarding the manufacturer of the completed or special purpose vehicle to restore conformity, including the withdrawal of the type-approval. If the vehicle complies with the values in table B.3, it shall be considered as a flagged vehicle for the in-service conformity family for the purposes of point 6.1.\nIf the result of the test exceeds 1,3 times the applicable emission limits, shall be considered as a fail for the in-service conformity family for the purposes of point 6.1., but not as an outlier for the relevant ISC family. If the completed or special purpose vehicle does not comply with the values in table B.3, this shall be reported to the granting type approval authority, who shall investigate the reasons for the non-compliance and take the appropriate measures regarding the manufacturer of the completed or special purpose vehicle to restore conformity, including the withdrawal of the type-approval.\n6.\nCompliance Assessment\n6.1.\nWithin 10 days of the end of the ISC testing for the sample as referred to in point 5.10.5, the granting type approval authority shall start detailed investigations with the manufacturer in order to decide whether the ISC family (or part of it) complies with the ISC rules and whether it requires remedial measures. For multistage or special purpose vehicles the granting type approval authority shall also perform detailed investigations when there are at least three faulty vehicles with the same fault or five flagged vehicles in the same ISC family, as set out in point 5.10.6.\n6.2.\nThe granting type approval authority shall ensure that sufficient resources are available to cover the costs for compliance assessment. Without prejudice to national law, those costs shall be recovered by fees that can be levied on the manufacturer by the granting type approval authority. Such fees shall cover all testing or auditing needed in order for an assessment on compliance to be reached.\n6.3.\nOn the request of the manufacturer, the granting type approval authority may extend the investigations to vehicles in service of the same manufacturer belonging to other ISC families which are likely to be affected by the same defects.\n6.4.\nThe detailed investigation shall take no more than 60 working days after the start of the investigation by the granting type approval authority. The granting type approval authority may conduct additional ISC tests designed to determine why vehicles have failed during the original ISC tests. The additional tests shall be conducted under similar conditions as the original ISC failed tests.\nUpon the request of the granting type approval authority, the manufacturer shall provide additional information, showing in particular the possible cause of the failures, which parts of the family might be affected, whether other families might be affected, or why the problem which caused the failure at the original ISC tests is not related to in-service conformity, if applicable. The manufacturer shall be given the opportunity to prove that the in-service conformity provisions have been complied with.\n6.5.\nWithin the deadline set out in point 6.3, the granting type approval authority shall take a decision on the compliance and the need to apply remedial measures for the ISC family covered by the detailed investigations and shall notify it to the manufacturer.\n7.\nRemedial Measures\n7.1.\nThe manufacturer shall establish a plan of remedial measures and submit it to the granting type approval authority within 45 working days of the notification referred to in point 6.4. That period may be extended by up to an additional 30 working days where the manufacturer demonstrates to the granting type approval authority that further time is required to investigate the non-compliance.\n7.2.\nThe remedial measures required by the granting type approval authority shall include reasonably designed and necessary tests on components and vehicles in order to demonstrate the effectiveness and durability of the remedial measures.\n7.3.\nThe manufacturer shall assign a unique identifying name or number to the plan of remedial measures. The plan of remedial measures shall include at least the following:\n(a) a description of each vehicle emission type included in the plan of remedial measures;\n(b) a description of the specific modifications, alterations, repairs, corrections, adjustments or other changes to be made to bring the vehicles into conformity including a brief summary of the data and technical studies which support the decision of the manufacturer as to the particular remedial measures to be taken;\n(c) a description of the method by which the manufacturer will inform the vehicle owners of the planned remedial measures;\n(d) a description of the proper maintenance or use, if any, which the manufacturer stipulates as a condition of eligibility for repair under the plan of remedial measures, and an explanation of the need for such condition;\n(e) a description of the procedure to be followed by vehicle owners to obtain correction of the non-conformity; that description shall include a date after which the remedial measures shall be taken, the estimated time for the workshop to perform the repairs and where they can be done;\n(f) an example of the information transmitted to the vehicle owner;\n(g) a brief description of the system which the manufacturer uses to assure an adequate supply of component or systems for fulfilling the remedial action, including information on when an adequate supply of the components, software or systems needed to initiate the application of remedial measures will be available;\n(h) an example of all instructions to be sent to the repair shops which will perform the repair;\n(i) a description of the impact of the proposed remedial measures on the emissions, fuel consumption, driveability, and safety of each vehicle emission type, covered by the plan of remedial measures, including supporting data and technical studies;\n(j) where the plan of remedial measures includes a recall, a description of the method for recording the repair shall be submitted to the granting type approval authority. If a label is used, an example of it shall also be submitted.\nFor the purposes of point (d), the manufacturer may not impose maintenance or use conditions which are not demonstrably related to the non-conformity and the remedial measures.\n7.4.\nThe repair shall be done expediently, within a reasonable time after the vehicle is received by the manufacturer for repair. Within 15 working days of receiving the proposed plan of remedial measures, the granting type approval authority shall approve it or require a new plan in accordance with point 7.5.\n7.5.\nWhen the granting type approval authority does not approve the plan of remedial measures, the manufacturer shall develop a new plan and submit it to the granting type approval authority within 20 working days of notification of the decision of the granting type approval authority.\n7.6.\nIf the granting type approval authority does not approve the second plan submitted by the manufacturer, it shall take all appropriate measures, in accordance with Article 30 of Directive 2007/46/EC, to restore conformity, including withdrawal of type approval where necessary.\n7.7.\nThe granting type approval authority shall notify its decision to all Member States and the Commission within 5 working days.\n7.8.\nThe remedial measures shall apply to all vehicles in the ISC family (or other relevant families identified by the manufacturer in accordance with point 6.2) that are likely to be affected by the same defect. The granting type approval authority shall decide if it is necessary to amend the type approval.\n7.9.\nThe manufacturer is responsible for the execution of the approved plan of remedial measures in all Member States and for keeping a record of every vehicle removed from the market or recalled and repaired and the workshop which performed the repair.\n7.10.\nThe manufacturer shall keep a copy of the communication with the customers of affected vehicles related to the plan of remedial measures. The manufacturer shall also maintain a record of the recall campaign, including the total number of vehicles affected per Member State and the total number of vehicles already recalled per Member State, along with an explanation of any delays in the application of the remedial measures. The manufacturer shall provide that record of the recall campaign to the granting type approval authority, the type approval authorities of each Member State and the Commission every two months.\n7.11.\nMember States shall take measures to ensure that the approved plan of remedial measures is applied within two years to at least 90 % of affected vehicles registered in their territory.\n7.12.\nThe repair and modification or addition of new equipment shall be recorded in a certificate provided to the vehicle owner, which shall include the number of the remedial campaign.\n8.\nAnnual report by the granting type approval authority\nThe granting type approval authority shall make available on a publicly accessible website, free of charge and without the need for the user to reveal their identity or sign up, a report with the results of all the finalised ISC investigations of the previous year, at the latest by the 31 March of each year. In case some ISC investigations of the previous year are still open by that date, they shall be reported as soon as the investigation is finalised. The report shall contain at least the items listed in Appendix 4.\nAppendix 1\nCriteria for vehicle selection and failed vehicles decision\nSelection of Vehicles for In Service Conformity Emissions Testing\nConfidential\nDate:\nx\nName of investigator:\nx\nLocation of test:\nx\nCountry of registration (in EU only):\nx\nx = Exclusion Criteria\nX = Checked and reported\nVehicle Characteristics\nRegistration plate number:\nx\nx\nMileage:\nThe vehicle must have between 15 000 km (or 30 000 km for testing evaporative emissions) and 100 000 km\nx\nDate of first registration:\nThe vehicle must be between 6 months (or 12 months for testing evaporative emissions) and 5 years old\nx\nVIN:\nx\nEmission class and character:\nx\nCountry of registration:\nThe vehicle must be registered in the EU\nx\nx\nModel:\nx\nEngine code:\nx\nEngine volume (l):\nx\nEngine power (kW):\nx\nGearbox type (auto/manual):\nx\nDrive axle (FWD/AWD/RWD):\nx\nTyre size (front and rear if different):\nx\nIs the vehicle involved in a recall or service campaign?\nIf yes: Which one? Has the campaign repairs already been done?\nThe repairs must have been done\nx\nx\nVehicle Owner Interview\n(the owner will only be asked the main questions and shall have no knowledge of the implications of the replies)\nName of the owner (only available to the accredited inspection body or laboratory/technical service)\nx\nContact (address / telephone) (only available to the accredited inspection body or laboratory/technical service)\nx\nHow many owners did the vehicle have?\nx\nDid the odometer not work?\nIf yes, the vehicle cannot be selected.\nx\nWas the vehicle used for one of the following?\nAs car used in show-rooms?\nx\nAs a taxi?\nx\nAs delivery vehicle?\nx\nFor racing / motor sports?\nx\nAs a rental car?\nx\nHas the vehicle carried heavy loads over the specifications of the manufacturer?\nIf yes, the vehicle cannot be selected.\nx\nHave there been major engine or vehicle repairs?\nx\nHave there been unauthorised major engine or vehicle repairs?\nIf yes, the vehicle cannot be selected.\nx\nHas there been a power increase/tuning?\nIf yes, the vehicle cannot be selected.\nx\nWas any part of the emissions after-treatment and/or the fuel system replaced? Were original parts used? If original parts were not used, the vehicle cannot be selected.\nx\nx\nWas any part of the emissions after-treatment system permanently removed?\nIf yes, the vehicle cannot be selected\nx\nWere there any unauthorised devices installed (Urea killer, emulator, etc)?\nIf yes, the vehicle cannot be selected\nx\nWas the vehicle involved in a serious accident? Provide a list of damage and repairs done afterwards\nx\nHas the car been used with a wrong fuel type (i.e. gasoline instead of diesel) in the past? Has the car been used with non-commercially available EU-quality fuel (black market, or blended fuel?)\nIf yes, the vehicle cannot be selected.\nx\nDid you use air-fresher, cockpit-spray, brake cleaner or other high hydrocarbon emission source around the vehicle during the last month? If yes, the vehicle cannot be selected for evaporative testing.\nx\nWas there a gasoline spill in the inside or outside of the vehicle during the last 3 months?\nIf yes, the vehicle cannot be selected for evaporative testing.\nx\nDid anyone smoke in the car during the last 12 months?\nIf yes, the vehicle cannot be selected for evaporative testing\nx\nDid you apply corrosion protection, stickers, under seal protection, on any other potential sources of volatile compounds to the car?\nIf yes, the vehicle cannot be selected for evaporative testing\nx\nWas the car repainted?\nIf yes, the vehicle cannot be selected for evaporative testing\nx\nWhere do you use your vehicle more often?\n% motorway\nx\n% rural\nx\n% urban\nx\nDid you drive the vehicle in a non EU Member State for more than 10 % of driving time?\nIf yes, the vehicle cannot be selected\nx\n—\nIn which country was the vehicle refuelled during the last two times?\nIf the vehicle was refuelled the last two times outside a state applying the EU Fuel Standards, the vehicle cannot be selected.\nx\nHas a fuel additive, not approved by the manufacturer been used?\nIf yes then the vehicle cannot be selected.\nx\nHas the vehicle been maintained and used in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions?\nIf not, the vehicle cannot be selected.\nx\nFull service and repair history including any re-works\nIf the full documentation cannot be provided, the vehicle cannot be selected.\nx\nVehicle Examination and Maintenance\nX = Exclusion Criteria/\nF = Faulty Vehicle\nX = checked and reported\n1\nFuel tank level (full / empty)\nIs the fuel reserve light ON? If yes, refuel before test.\nx\n2\nAre there any warning lights on the instrument panel activated indicating a vehicle or exhaust after-treatment system malfunctioning that cannot be resolve by normal maintenance? (Malfunction Indication Light, Engine Service Light, etc?)\nIf yes, the vehicle cannot be selected\nx\n3\nIs the SCR light on after engine-on?\nIf yes, the AdBlue should be filled in, or the repair executed before the vehicle is used for testing.\nx\n4\nVisual inspection exhaust system\nCheck leaks between exhaust manifold and end of tailpipe. Check and document (with photos)\nIf there is damage or leaks, the vehicle is declared faulty .\nF\n5\nExhaust gas relevant components\nCheck and document (with photos) all emissions relevant components for damage.\nIf there is damage, the vehicle is declared faulty .\nF\n6\nEvap system\nPressurize fuel-system (from canister side), testing for leaks in a constant ambient temperature environment, FID sniff test around and in the vehicle. If the FID sniff test is not passed, the vehicle is declared faulty .\nF\n7\nFuel sample\nCollect fuel sample from the fuel tank.\nx\n8\nAir filter and oil filter\nCheck for contamination and damage and change if damaged or heavily contaminated or less than 800 km before the next recommended change.\nx\n9\nWindow washer fluid (only for evaporative testing)\nRemove window washer fluid and fill tank with hot water.\nx\n10\nWheels (front & rear)\nCheck whether the wheels are freely moveable or blocked by the brake.\nIf not, the vehicle cannot be selected.\nx\n11\nTyres (only for evaporative testing)\nRemove spare tyre, change to stabilised tyres if the tyres were changes less than 15 000 km ago. Use summer and all season tyres only.\nx\n12\nDrive belts & cooler cover\nIn case of damage, the vehicle is declared faulty. Document with photos\nF\n13\nCheck fluid levels\nCheck the max. and min. levels (engine oil, cooling liquid) / top up if below minimum\nx\n14\nFiller flap (only for evaporative testing)\nCheck overfill line within filler flap is completely free of residues or flush the hose with hot water.\nx\n15\nVacuum hoses and electrical wiring\nCheck all for integrity. In case of damage, the vehicle is declared faulty. Document with photos\nF\n16\nInjection valves / cabling\nCheck all cables and fuel lines. In case of damage, the vehicle is declared faulty. Document with photos\nF\n17\nIgnition cable (gasoline)\nCheck spark plugs, cables, etc. In case of damage, replace them.\nx\n18\nEGR & Catalyst, Particle Filter\nCheck all cables, wires and sensors.\nIn case of tampering, the vehicle cannot be selected.\nIn case of damage the vehicle is declared Faulty, Document with photos\nx/F\n19\nSafety condition\nCheck tyres, vehicle's body, electrical and braking system status are in safe conditions for the test and respect road traffic rules.\nIf not, the vehicle cannot be selected.\nx\n20\nSemi-trailer\nAre there electric cables for semi-trailer connection, where required?\nx\n21\nAerodynamic modifications\nVerify no aftermarket aerodynamics modification that cannot be removed before testing was made (roof boxes, load racking, spoilers, etc.) and no standard aerodynamics components are missing (front deflectors, diffusers, splitters, etc.).\nIf yes, the vehicle cannot be selected. Document with photos.\nx\n22\nCheck if less than 800 km away from next scheduled service, if yes, then perform the service.\nx\n23\nAll checks requiring OBD connections to be performed before and/or after the end of testing\n24\nPowertrain Control Module calibration part number and checksum\nx\n25\nOBD diagnosis (before or after the emissions test)\nRead Diagnostic Trouble Codes & Print error log\nx\n26\nOBD Service Mode 09 Query (before or after the emissions test)\nRead Service Mode 09. Record the information.\nx\n27\nOBD mode 7 (before or after the emissions test)\nRead Service Mode 07. Record the information\nRemarks for: Repair / replacement of components / part numbers\nAppendix 2\nRules for performing Type 4 tests during in-service conformity\nType 4 tests for in-service conformity shall be performed in accordance with Annex VI (or Annex VI of Regulation (EC) No 692/2008 where applicable), with the following exceptions:\nVehicles tested with the Type 4 test shall be at least 12 months of age.\nThe canister shall be considered aged and therefore the Canister Bench Ageing procedure shall not be followed.\nThe canister shall be loaded outside the vehicle, following the procedure described for this purpose in Annex VI and shall be removed and mounted to the vehicle following the repair instructions of the manufacturer. An FID sniff test (with results less than 100 ppm at 20 °C) shall be made as close as possible to the canister before and after the loading to confirm that the canister is mounted properly.\nThe tank shall be considered aged and therefore no Permeability Factor shall be added in the calculation of the result of the Type 4 test.\nAppendix 3\nDetailed ISC report\nThe following information shall be included in the detailed ISC report:\n1.. the name and address of the manufacturer;\n2.. the name, address, telephone and fax numbers and e-mail address of the responsible testing laboratory;\n3.. the model name(s) of the vehicles included in the test plan;\n4.. where appropriate, the list of vehicle types covered within the manufacturer's information, i.e. for tailpipe emissions, the in-service family group;\n5.. the numbers of the type approvals applicable to these vehicle types within the family, including, where applicable, the numbers of all extensions and field fixes/recalls (re-works);\n6.. details of extensions, field fixes/recalls to those type approvals for the vehicles covered within the manufacturer's information (if requested by the approval authority);\n7.. the period of time over which the information was collected;\n8.. the vehicle build period covered (e.g. vehicles manufactured during the 2017 calendar year);\n9.. the ISC checking procedure, including:\n(i) vehicle sourcing method;\n(ii) vehicle selection and rejection criteria (including the answers to the table in Appendix 1, including photos);\n(iii) test types and procedures used for the programme;\n(iv) the acceptance/rejection criteria for the family group;\n(v) geographical area(s) within which the manufacturer has collected information;\n(vi) sample size and sampling plan used;\n10.. the results of the ISC procedure, including:\n(i) identification of the vehicles included in the programme (whether tested or not). The identification shall include the Table in Appendix 1.\n(ii) test data for tailpipe emissions:\ntest fuel specifications (e.g. test reference fuel or market fuel),\ntest conditions (temperature, humidity, dynamometer inertia weight),\ndynamometer settings (e.g. road load, power setting),\ntest results and calculation of pass/fail;\n(iii) test data for evaporative emissions:\ntest fuel specifications (e.g. test reference fuel or market fuel),\ntest conditions (temperature, humidity, dynamometer inertia weight),\ndynamometer settings (e.g. road load, power setting),\ntest results and calculation of pass/fail.\nAppendix 4\nFormat of the annual ISC Report by the granting type approval authority\nTITLE\nA.. Quick overview and main conclusions\nB.. ISC activities performed by the manufacturer in the previous year:\n(1) Information gathering by manufacturer\n(2) ISC testing (including planning and selection of families tested, and final results of tests)\nC.. ISC activities performed by accredited laboratories or technical services in the previous year:\n(3) Information gathering and risk assessment\n(4) ISC testing (including planning and selection of families tested, and final results of tests)\nD.. ISC activities performed by the granting type approval authority in the previous year:\n(5) Information gathering and risk assessment\n(6) ISC testing (including planning and selection of families tested, and final results of tests)\n(7) Detailed investigations\n(8) Remedial measures\nE.. Assessment of the yearly expected emissions decrease due to any ISC remedial measures\nF.. Lessons Learned (including for performance of instruments used)\nG.. Report of other invalid tests\nAppendix 5\nTransparency\nTable 1\nTransparency list 1\nID\nInput\nType of data\nUnit\nDescription\n1\n2017/1151 TA Number\nText\n—\nAs defined in Annex I/Appendix 4\n2\nInterpolation Family ID\nText\n—\nAs defined in Annex XXI, paragraph 5.6. in general req.\n3\nPEMS Family ID\nText\n—\nAs defined in Annex IIIa, App.7, paragraph 5.2.\n4\nKi family ID\nText\n—\nAs defined in Annex XXI, paragraph 5.9.\n5\nATCT family ID\nText\n—\nAs defined in Sub-Annex 6a of Annex XXI\n6\nEvap family ID\nText\n—\nAs defined in Annex VI\n7\nRL family ID of vehicle H\nText\n—\nAs defined in Annex XXI, paragraph 5.7.\n7a\nRL family ID of vehicle L (if relevant)\nText\n—\nAs defined in Annex XXI, paragraph5.7.\n8\nTest Mass of vehicle H\nNumber\nkg\nWLTP Test Mass as defined in 3.2.25. definitions in Annex XXI\n8a\nTest Mass of vehicle L (if relevant)\nNumber\nkg\nWLTP Test Mass as defined in 3.2.25. definitions in Annex XXI\n9\nF0 of vehicle H\nNumber\nN\nRoad load coefficient as defined in Sub-Annex 4 of Annex XXI\n9a\nF0 of vehicle L (if relevant)\nNumber\nN\nRoad load coefficient as defined in Sub-Annex 4 of Annex XXI\n10\nF1 of vehicle H\nNumber\nN/km/h\nRoad load coefficient as defined in Sub-Annex 4 of Annex XXI\n10a\nF1 of vehicle L (if relevant)\nNumber\nN/km/h\nRoad load coefficient as defined in Sub-Annex 4 of Annex XXI\n11\nF2 of vehicle H\nNumber\nN/(km/h)^2\nRoad load coefficient as defined in Sub-Annex 4 of Annex XXI\n11a\nF2 of vehicle L (if relevant)\nNumber\nN/(km/h)^2\nRoad load coefficient as defined in Sub-Annex 4 of Annex XXI\n12a\nCO2 mass emissions for ICE and NOVC vehicles of vehicle H\nNumbers\ng/km\nWLTP CO2 emissions (Low, Medium, High, Extra-High, Combined) as calculated from:\nStep 9, table A7/1 of Sub-Annex 7, Annex XXI for ICE vehicles, or\nStep 8 from table A8/5 of Sub-Annex 8, Annex XXI for NOVC vehicles\n12aa\nCO2 mass emissions for ICE and NOVC vehicles of vehicle L (if relevant)\nNumbers\ng/km\nWLTP CO2 emissions (Low, Medium, High, Extra-High, Combined) as calculated from:\nStep 9, table A7/1 of Sub-Annex 7, Annex XXI for ICE vehicles, or\nStep 8 from table A8/5 of Sub-Annex 8, Annex XXI for NOVC vehicles\n12b\nCO2 mass emissions for OVC vehicles of vehicle H\nNumbers\ng/km\nWLTP CS CO2 emissions (Low, Medium, High, Extra-High, Combined) as calculated from Step 8 from table A8/5 of Sub-Annex 8, Annex XXI,\nWLTP CD CO2 emissions (combined) and WLTP CO2 emissions (weighted, combined) as calculated from Step 10 from table A8/8 of Sub-Annex 8, Annex XXI.\n12ba\nCO2 mass emissions for OVC vehicles of vehicle L (if relevant)\nNumbers\ng/km\nWLTP CS CO2 emissions (Low, Medium, High, Extra-High, Combined) as calculated from Step 8 from table A8/5 of Sub-Annex 8, Annex XXI,\nWLTP CD CO2 emissions (combined) and WLTP CO2 emissions (weighted, combined) as calculated from Step 10 from table A8/8 of Sub-Annex 8, Annex XXI.\n13\nDrive wheels of vehicle in family\nText\nfront, rear, 4x4\nAnnex I, Appendix 4 addendum 1.7\n14\nChassis Dyno configuration during TA test\nText\nsingle or dual-axle\nAs defined in Annex XXI, Sub-Annex 6; 2.4.2.4. and 2.4.2.5.\n15\nDeclared Vmax of vehicle H\nNumber\nkm/h\nMaximum vehicle speed as defined in 3.7.2. definitions in Annex XXI\n15a\nDeclared Vmax of vehicle L (if relevant)\nNumber\nkm/h\nMaximum vehicle speed as defined in 3.7.2. definitions in Annex XXI\n16\nMaximum net power at engine speed\nNumber\n... kW/... min\nAs defined in Sub-Annex 2 of Annex XXI\n17\nMass in Running order of vehicle H\nNumber\nkg\nMRO as defined in 3.2.5. definitions in Annex XXI\n17a\nMass in Running order of vehicle L (if relevant)\nNumber\nkg\nMRO as defined in 3.2.5. definitions in Annex XXI\n18\nDriver selectable mode(s) used during the TA tests (pure ICE) or for charge sustaining test (,NOVC-HEV, OVC-HEV, NOVC-FCHV)\nDifferent formats possible (text, pictures, etc)\n—\nIn case there are non predominant driver selectable modes the text shall describe all the modes used during the tests\n19\nDriver selectable mode(s) used during the TA tests for charge depleting test (OVC-HEV)\nDifferent formats possible (text, pictures, etc)\n—\nIn case there are non predominant driver selectable modes the text shall describe all the modes used during the tests\n20\nIdling engine speed\nNumber\nrpm\nAs defined in Sub-Annex 2 of Annex XXI\n21\nn. of gears\nNumber\n—\nAs defined in Sub-Annex 2 of Annex XXI\n22\nGear ratios\nTable values\n—\nInternal gearbox ratios; final drive ratio(s); total gear ratios\n23\nTyre dimensions of the test vehicle front/rear\nLetters/Number\n—\nUsed in TA\n24\nFull load power curve for ICEVs\nTable values\nrpm vs. kW\nThe full load power curve over the engine speed range from nidle to nrated or nmax, or ndv(ngvmax) × vmax, whichever is higher\n25\nAdditional safety margin\nVector\n%\nAs defined in Sub-Annex 2 of Annex XXI\n26\nSpecific n_min_drive\nNumber\nTable (from standstill to 1, from 2 to 3, …)\nrpm\nAs defined in Sub-Annex 2 of Annex XXI\n27\nCycle check-sum of vehicle L and H\nNumber\n—\nDifferent for vehicle L and H. To verify the correctness of the cycle used. To be introduced only in case of cycle different from 3b\n28\nGear Shift average Gear of vehicle H\nNumber\n—\nTo validate different GS calculations.\n29\nATCT FCF (family correction factor)\nNumber\n—\nAs defined in Sub-Annex 6a, section 3.8.1. of Annex XXI. One value per each fuel in case of multiple fuel vehicles.\n30a\nAdditive Ki factor(s)\nTable values\n—\nTable defining per each pollutant and for CO2 the value (g/km, mg/km, …). Empty if multiplicative Ki factors are provided.\n30b\nMultiplicative Ki factors(s)\nTable values\n—\nTable defining per each pollutant and for CO2 the value. Empty if additive Ki factors are provided\n31a\nAdditive Deterioration Factors (DF)\nTable values\n—\nTable defining per each pollutant and the value (g/km, mg/km, …). Empty if multiplicative DF factors are provided\n31b\nMultiplicative Deterioration Factors (DF)\nTable values\n—\nTable defining per each pollutant the value. Empty if additive DF factors are provided\n32\nBattery voltage for all REESS\nNumbers\nV\nAs defined in Sub-Annex 6 Appendix 2 of Annex XXI for RCB correction in case of ICE, and in Sub-Annex 8 Appendix 2 of Annex XXI for HEVs, PEVs, and FCHVs (DIN EN 60050-482)\n33\nK correction coefficient\nNumber\n(g/km)/(Wh/km)\nFor NOVC and OVC-HEVs correction of CS CO2 emissions as defined in Sub-Annex 8 of Annex XXI; phase-specific or combined\n34a\nElectric energy consumption of vehicle H\nNumber\nWh/km\nFor OVC-HEVs this is ECAC,weighted (combined) and for PEVs Electric Consumption (combined) as defined in Sub-Annex 8 of Annex XXI\n34b\nElectric energy consumption of vehicle L (if relevant)\nNumber\nWh/km\nFor OVC-HEVs this is ECAC,weighted, (combined) and for PEVs Electric Consumption (combined) as defined in Sub-Annex 8 of Annex XXI\n35a\nElectric range of vehicle H\nNumber\nkm\nFor OVC-HEVs this is EAER (combined) and for PEVs Pure Electric Range (Combined) as defined in Sub-Annex 8 of Annex XXI\n35b\nElectric range of vehicle L (if relevant)\nNumber\nkm\nFor OVC-HEVs this is EAER (combined) and for PEVs Pure Electric Range (Combined) as defined in Sub-Annex 8 of Annex XXI\n36a\nElectric range city of vehicle H\nNumber\nkm\nFor OVC-HEVs this is EAERcity and for PEVs Pure Electric Range (City) as defined in Sub-Annex 8 of Annex XXI\n36b\nElectric range city of vehicle L (if relevant)\nNumber\nkm\nFor OVC-HEVs this is EAERcity and for PEVs Pure Electric Range (City) as defined in Sub-Annex 8 of Annex XXI\n37a\nDriving cycle class of vehicle H\nText\n—\nTo know which cycle (class 1/2/3a/3b) has been used to calculate cycle energy demand for individual vehicle\n37b\nDriving cycle class of vehicle L (if relevant)\nText\n—\nTo know which cycle (class 1/2/3a/3b) has been used to calculate cycle energy demand for individual vehicle\n38a\nDownscaling f_dsc of vehicle H\nNumber\n—\nTo know if downscaling is needed and has been used to calculate cycle energy demand for individual vehicle\n38b\nDownscaling f_dsc of vehicle L if relevant\nNumber\n—\nTo know if downscaling is needed and has been used to calculate cycle energy demand for individual vehicle\n39a\nCapped speed of vehicle H\nyes/no\nkm/h\nTo know if capped speed procedure is needed and has to be used to calculate cycle energy demand for individual vehicle\n39b\nCapped speed of vehicle L (if relevant)\nyes/no\nkm/h\nTo know if capped speed procedure is needed and has to be used to calculate cycle energy demand for individual vehicle\n40a\nTechnically permissible maximum laden mass of vehicle H\nNumber\nkg\n40b\nTechnically permissible maximum laden mass of vehicle L (if relevant)\nNumber\nkg\n41\nDirect injection\nyes/no\n—\n42\nRegeneration recognition\nText\n—\nDescription by vehicle manufacturer on how to recognize that a regeneration occurred during a test\n43\nRegeneration completion\nText\n—\nDescription of the procedure to complete the regeneration\n44\nWeight distribution\nVector\n—\nPercentage of vehicle weight applied to each axle\nFor multistage or special purpose vehicles\n45\nAllowed final Vehicle mass in running order\nkg\nFrom-to\n46\nAllowed frontal area for final vehicle\ncm2\nFrom-to\n47\nAllowed Rolling resistance\nkg/t\nFrom-to\n48\nAllowed projected frontal area of air entrance of the front grille\ncm2\nFrom-to\nTable 2\nTransparency list 2\nThe Transparency list 2 is composed of two datasets characterized by the fields reported in Table 3 and Table 4.\nTable 3\nDataset 1 of the Transparency list 2\nField\nType of data\nDescription\nID1\nNumber\nUnique row identifier of the Dataset 1 in the Transparency list 2\nTVV\nText\nUnique identifier of the Type, Variant, Version of the vehicle (key field in the Dataset 1)\nIF ID\nText\nIdentifier of the Interpolation family\nRL ID\nText\nIdentifier of the Road Load Family\nMake\nText\nTrade name of manufacturer\nCommercial name\nText\nCommercial name of the TVV\nCategory\nText\nCategory of vehicle\nBodywork\nText\nType of bodywork\nTable 4\nDataset 2 of the Transparency List 2\nField\nType of data\nDescription\nID2\nNumber\nUnique row identifier of the Dataset 2 in the Transparency list 2\nIF ID\nText\nUnique identifier of the Interpolation family (key field in the Dataset 2)\nWVTA Number\nText\nIdentifier of the Whole Vehicle Type-Approval\nEmissions TA Number\nText\nIdentifier of the Emissions Type-Approval\nPEMS ID\nText\nIdentifier of the PEMS family\nEF ID\nText\nIdentifier of the Evap Family\nATCT ID\nText\nIdentifier of the ATCT Family\nKi ID\nText\nIdentifier of the Ki family\nDurability ID\nText\nIdentifier of the Durability Family\nFuel\nText\nVehicle Fuel Type\nDual Fuel\nYes/No\nIf the vehicle can use more than one fuel\nEngine Capacity\nNumber\nEngine capacity in cm3\nRated Engine Power\nNumber\nRated power of the engine (kW at min– 1)\nTransmission type\nText\nType of vehicle transmission\nPowered axles\nText\nNumber and position of the powered axles\nElectric machine\nText\nNumber and type of electric machine(s)\nMaximum net power\nNumber\nMaximum net power of the electric machine\nHEV Category\nText\nCategory of the hybrid electric vehicle\n’",
  "extent": "E+W+S+N.I.",
  "status": null,
  "version": "current",
  "annotations": [
    {
      "type": "footnote",
      "label": "f1",
      "text": "Directive 98/70/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 October 1998 relating to the quality of petrol and diesel fuels and amending Council Directive 93/12/EEC (OJ L 350, p. 58)."
    }
  ],
  "outstanding_effects": [],
  "provenance": {
    "source": "legislation.gov.uk",
    "source_url": "https://www.legislation.gov.uk/eur/2018/1832/annex/II",
    "retrieved_at": "2026-11-01T14:43:48.540927+00:00"
  },
  "licence": "Open Government Licence v3.0",
  "licence_url": "https://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/version/3/",
  "attribution": "Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Source: legislation.gov.uk, The National Archives."
}