{
  "url": "https://openlegislation.uk/eu-regulation-2018-1881/annex/division-6",
  "json_url": "https://openlegislation.uk/eu-regulation-2018-1881/annex/division-6.json",
  "legislation": "eur/2018/1881",
  "legislation_title": "Commission Regulation (EU) 2018/1881 of 3 December 2018 amending Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH) as regards Annexes I, III,VI, VII, VIII, IX, X, XI, and XII to address nanoforms of substances (Text with EEA relevance)",
  "legislation_url": "https://openlegislation.uk/eu-regulation-2018-1881",
  "path": "annex/division/6",
  "kind": "division",
  "number": "6",
  "heading": "Annex IX to Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 is amended as follows:",
  "text": "(a) In the introductory text, the following text is added after the second paragraph:\n‘Without prejudice to the information submitted for other forms, any relevant physicochemical, toxicological and ecotoxicological information shall include characterisation of the nanoform tested and test conditions. A justification shall be provided where QSARs are used or evidence is obtained by means other than testing, as well as a description of the range of the characteristics/properties of the nanoforms to which the evidence can be applied.’;\n(b) Point 8.6.2 is replaced by the following:\n‘\n8.6.2.\nSub-chronic toxicity study (90-day), one species, rodent, male and female, most appropriate route of administration, having regard to the likely route of human exposure.\n8.6.2.\nThe sub-chronic toxicity study (90 days) does not need to be conducted if:\na reliable short-term toxicity study (28 days) is available showing severe toxicity effects according to the criteria for classifying the substance as R48, for which the observed NOAEL-28 days, with the application of an appropriate uncertainty factor, allows the extrapolation towards the NOAEL-90 days for the same route of exposure, or\na reliable chronic toxicity study is available, provided that an appropriate species and route of administration were used, or\na substance undergoes immediate disintegration and there are sufficient data on the cleavage products (both for systemic effects and effects at the site of uptake), or\nthe substance is unreactive, insoluble and not inhalable and there is no evidence of absorption and no evidence of toxicity in a 28-day “limit test”, particularly if such a pattern is coupled with limited human exposure.\nThe appropriate route shall be chosen on the following basis:\nTesting by the dermal route is appropriate if:\n(1) skin contact in production and/or use is likely; and\n(2) the physicochemical properties suggest a significant rate of absorption through the skin; and\n(3) one of the following conditions is met:\ntoxicity is observed in the acute dermal toxicity test at lower doses than in the oral toxicity test, or\nsystemic effects or other evidence of absorption is observed in skin and/or eye irritation studies, or\nin vitro tests indicate significant dermal absorption, or\nsignificant dermal toxicity or dermal penetration is recognised for structurally-related substances.\nTesting by the inhalation route is appropriate if:\nexposure of humans via inhalation is likely taking into account the vapour pressure of the substance and/or the possibility of exposure to aerosols, particles or droplets of an inhalable size.\nFor nanoforms toxicokinetics shall be considered including recovery period and, where relevant, lung clearance.\nFurther studies shall be proposed by the registrant or may be required by the Agency in accordance with Articles 40 or 41 in case of:\nfailure to identify a NOAEL in the 90 days study unless the reason for the failure to identify a NOAEL is absence of adverse toxic effects, or\ntoxicity of particular concern (e.g. serious/severe effects), or\nindications of an effect for which the available evidence is inadequate for toxicological and/or risk characterisation. In such cases it may also be more appropriate to perform specific toxicological studies that are designed to investigate these effects (e.g. immunotoxicity, neurotoxicity, and in particular for nanoforms indirect genotoxicity), or\nparticular concern regarding exposure (e.g. use in consumer products leading to exposure levels which are close to the dose levels at which toxicity to humans may be expected).\n’;\n(c) Point 9.2.1.2. is replaced by the following:\n‘\n9.2.1.2.\nSimulation testing on ultimate degradation in surface water\n9.2.1.2.\nThe study need not be conducted if:\nthe substances is highly insoluble in water, or\nthe substance is readily biodegradable.\nFor nanoforms, the study may not be waived on the basis of high insolubility in water alone.\n’;\n(d) Subsection 9.3. is replaced by the following:\n‘\n9.3.\nFate and behaviour in the environment\n9.3.2.\nBioaccumulation in aquatic species, preferably fish\n9.3.2.\nThe study need not be conducted if:\nthe substance has a low potential for bioaccumulation (for instance a log Kow ≤ 3) and/or a low potential to cross biological membranes, or\ndirect and indirect exposure of the aquatic compartment is unlikely.\nFor nanoforms, use of any physicochemical property (e.g. octanol water partition coefficient, dissolution rate, dispersion stability) as a reason for waiving the study shall include adequate justification of its relevance to low potential for bioaccumulation or unlikely direct and indirect exposure of the aquatic compartment.\n9.3.3.\nFurther information on adsorption/desorption depending on the results of the study required in Annex VIII\n9.3.3.\nThe study need not be conducted if:\nbased on the physicochemical properties, the substance can be expected to have a low potential for adsorption (e.g. the substance has a low octanol water partition coefficient), or\nthe substance and its degradation products decompose rapidly.\nFor nanoforms, use of any physicochemical property (e.g. octanol water partition coefficient, dissolution rate, dispersion stability) as a reason for waiving the study shall include adequate justification of its relevance to low potential for adsorption.\n’;\n(e) Subsection 9.4 is replaced by the following:\n‘\n9.4.\nEffects on terrestrial organisms\n9.4.\nThese studies do not need to be conducted if direct and indirect exposure of the soil compartment is unlikely.\nIn the absence of toxicity data for soil organisms, the equilibrium partitioning method may be applied to assess the hazard to soil organisms. Where the equilibrium partitioning method is applied to nanoforms, this shall be scientifically justified.\nThe choice of the appropriate tests depends on the outcome of the chemical safety assessment.\nIn particular for substances that have a high potential to adsorb to soil or that are very persistent, the registrant shall consider long-term toxicity testing instead of short-term.\n’;",
  "extent": "E+W+S+N.I.",
  "status": null,
  "version": "current",
  "annotations": [],
  "outstanding_effects": [],
  "provenance": {
    "source": "legislation.gov.uk",
    "source_url": "https://www.legislation.gov.uk/eur/2018/1881/annex/division/6",
    "retrieved_at": "2026-11-01T14:43:45.560696+00:00"
  },
  "licence": "Open Government Licence v3.0",
  "licence_url": "https://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/version/3/",
  "attribution": "Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Source: legislation.gov.uk, The National Archives."
}