{
  "url": "https://openlegislation.uk/eu-regulation-2018-2032/annex/appendix-B",
  "json_url": "https://openlegislation.uk/eu-regulation-2018-2032/annex/appendix-B.json",
  "legislation": "eur/2018/2032",
  "legislation_title": "Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/2032 of 20 November 2018 amending Commission Regulation (EC) No 416/2007 concerning the technical specifications for Notices to Skippers",
  "legislation_url": "https://openlegislation.uk/eu-regulation-2018-2032",
  "path": "annex/appendix/B",
  "kind": "appendix",
  "number": "B.",
  "heading": "NOTICES TO SKIPPERS ENCODING GUIDE FOR APPLICATION DEVELOPERS",
  "text": "1.\nBackground & Structure\nNotices to Skippers (NtS) were being implemented in various European countries based on Commission Regulation 416/2007/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the technical specifications for Notices to Skippers as referred to in Article 5 of RIS directive 2005/44/EC. The NtS standard is in the continuous process of enhancement, a major step forward was the release of the NtS Web Service facilitating exchange of NtS messages between authorities as well as between authorities and NtS users as well as NtS XSD 4.0 streamlining the encoding of NtS messages.\n1.1.\nPurpose of NtS Encoding Guide\nThe NtS Encoding Guide explains the applicability of the four NtS message types as well as codes to be used in case of certain events. It provides NtS editors with NtS message filling instructions, thus allows nationally and internationally harmonised encoding of NtS messages.\nConsidering increased use of the NtS web service, NtS messages shall be further harmonised to ensure proper display of content on third party systems. Uniform encoding of messages is also a prerequisite for consideration of messages in voyage planning applications. The NtS Encoding Guide version 1.0 applies to NtS XSD 4.0 and the NtS Web Service WSDL 2.0.4.0.\n1.1.1.\nNtS Encoding Guide for editors\nThe NtS Encoding Guide for editors is intended for personnel editing (and publishing) NtS messages including step-by-step creation instructions for the proper message types as well as explanation of codes. The encoding guide for editors also includes relevant information for application developers.\n1.1.2.\nNtS Encoding Guide for application developers (this document)\nThe NtS Encoding Guide for developers includes guidelines for NtS application implementation explaining logic, processes and auto/default values.\n2.\nNtS messages and sections\nAn NtS message consists of the following:\nthe identification section,\nsection defining the applicable object(s) or fairway section(s) the message is related to,\none or more of the following sections according to the message type:\nlimitation(s) for the Fairway and traffic related message,\nmeasurement(s) for the Water level related message,\nice condition(s) for the Ice related message,\nweather report(s) for the Weather related message.\nFigure 2\nVisualisation of the NtS message structure: mandatory element (1), mandatory element that may occur one or two times (1…2), mandatory element that has to occur two times (2), mandatory elements that may occur as often as necessary (1-n), optional element that may occur as often as necessary (0…n)\nThe identification section is mandatory and includes general information about the message originator, sender, date issue, country and original language and is provided together with one of the four different NtS message section types:\nFairway and traffic related section: a ‘Fairway and Traffic related Message’ (FTM) is usually created by NtS editors following the NtS Encoding Guide for editors. It is related to stretches of waterways (defined by its begin and end ISRS Location Codes and/or objects on the waterway defined by their respective ISRS Location Code. [go to chapter 6]\nWater level related section: a ‘Water Related Message’ (WRM) facilitates provision of information on current and predicted water levels as well as other information. Usually WRM are created automatically (and periodically) based on sensor measurements or infrastructure status not requiring NtS editor interaction. The water related message section contains information for an object (e.g. gauge station) or a fairway section (e.g. least sounded depth for a stretch, applicable regime at a waterway section). The object is identified by its ISRS Location Code, the fairway section is defined by its begin- and end-ISRS Location Codes. [go to chapter 3]\nIce related section: an ‘ICE Message’ (ICEM) contains information about the ice conditions for a fairway stretch defined by its begin- and end-ISRS Location Codes. [go to chapter 4]\nWeather related section: a ‘WEather Related Message’ (WERM) enables provision of information on current as well as forecasted weather situations on a waterway stretch defined by its begin- and end-ISRS Location Codes. [go to chapter 5]\nIn addition, the ISRS Location Code (International Ship Reporting Standard) is used to define the applicable object(s) or fairway section(s) the message is related to.\nThe ISRS location code is defined in point 4.3 of the Annex to this Regulation.\n3.\nWRM basic considerations\nWater level information is very important for voyage planning as well as safety. At the moment there is no common standard of referencing water level information. The values of gauges are referring to different sea-levels or to special reference points. To provide a proper reference, the respective ‘reference_code’ shall always be provided together with the value. WRM may be used to provide the following information:\nWater level (including predictions),\nLeast sounded depth (including predictions),\nVertical clearance (including predictions),\nDischarge (including predictions),\nBarrage status,\nRegime.\nClarifications for translations in the spreadsheet ‘reference_code’ are provided in chapter 7.11.\nUsually WRM are created and published automatically based on information received from sensor equipment or information received from infrastructure (e.g. predictions, barrage status). There may be different triggers for WRM publication, e.g. periodically or when certain values are reached.\n3.1.\nFilling of nts_number section in the WRM\nIn NtS XSD 4.0 the NtS number is optional within WRM messages. If it is provided every number has to be unique (Organisation/Year/Number/Serial) per message type and it is up to the organisation providing the WRM to ensure unique numbers (it is not required to have consecutive numbers).\n3.2.\nFilling of WRM including predictions\nThe date_start of validity_period has to be filled with present date (date_issue) and the date_end of validity_period has to be filled with the next day after date_issue.\nTo provide changes in e.g. water level in a user-friendly way the difference to a previous comparative measurement may be provided in the WRM difference section. Besides the change in the value (e.g. - 5 [cm]) also the time difference to the comparative measurement has to be provided.\nIn case of predictions the ‘measure_date’ is the date/time the prediction is valid for.\nWater level predictions always include a factor of uncertainty. Usually models with different parameters (e.g. weather forecast) are calculated leading to different predicted water level values. To enable provision of a minimum and maximum predicted value e.g. visualisation of a water level prediction confidence interval, two additional optional data fields are included in the WRM ‘measure’ section.\nAn illustration of water level prediction confidence interval is given in the following figure:\nFigure 3\nVisualisation of water level prediction confidence interval: most probable value (black), confidence interval upper boarder (violet), confidence interval lower boarder (red), measured water level (blue)\n(The x-axis shows the time; the y-axis shows the water level in cm)\nTwo elements are available in the NtS XSD:\n<value_min> lowest value of confidence interval\n<value_max> highest value of confidence interval\nBesides predicted water levels the confidence interval may also be used to state the uncertainty of published least sounded depth and vertical clearance information.\nThe confidence interval value_min and value_max enable provision of WRM value confidence interval via standardised NtS WRM Message to use it in graphs. The raw data itself shall not be displayed to IWT users (e.g. in code format).\nThe measure_code ‘NOM’ must not be used. In case there is no measurement for a certain type of WRM the value elements have to be omitted if a message should be sent anyhow.\n4.\nICEM processes\nIce Messages depend on local observation and assessment and will usually be generated manually (in case of automatic generation the rules for manual creation have to be followed, see NtS Encoding Guide for editors).\nThe ICEM is published for a certain fairway_section defined by its begin and end ISRS Location Codes and contains the ice_condition at a certain measurement date.\nThe validity of the ICEM starts at the date of publication (automatically set by the NtS application). In order to avoid ICEM being displayed to users that are not valid any more, the validity date_end has to be filled automatically by the NtS application with the day after publication (unless it is ensured by national processes that messages will get a validity date end as soon as the information included in the message is not up-to-date any more).\nIn the NtS Encoding Guide for editors it is described under which circumstances an NtS editor creates a new ICEM or updates an existing ICEM. The following processes apply:\n4.1.\nNew ICEM\n(1) NtS applications may offer NtS editors:\n(a) to use existing notices as draft upon creation of new ICEM (e.g. if ice conditions are similar to the existing notice); and/or\n(b) to use notice templates for certain situations.\n(2) The content (e.g. time of measurement or respective ice conditions) has to be entered by the editor in line with chapter 6 of the NtS Encoding Guide for editors. The date and time of measurement could also be set by the application according to national definitions.\n(3) When an NtS editor/publishers triggers the publish action:\n(a) it is checked if all mandatory content is provided in line with the NtS XSD (if not go back to (2));\n(b) the nts_number is generated by the NtS application:\n(i) the ‘organisation’ is filled with the name or code of the responsible organisation depending on the role of the publishing user;\n(ii) the ‘year’ is filled with the current year;\n(iii) the next available ‘number’ is assigned;\n(iv) the ‘serial number’ 0 is assigned;\n(c) ‘date_issue’ is automatically filled with the actual date/time of publish action;\n(d) ‘validity_period’ — ‘date_start’ is automatically filled with the actual date of publication;\n(e) ‘validity_period’ — ‘date_end’ is automatically filled with the next day after the date of publication (unless it is ensured by national processes that messages will get a validity date end as soon as the information included in the message is not up-to-date any more).\n4.2.\nUpdate of an existing ICEM\n(1) The respective published message has to be selected to be updated in the ICEM editor tool. The original ICEM has to be copied or altered in the DB (depending on national processes). Expired ICEM (which passed the validity_date_end) cannot be updated any more, if this is the case NtS editors have to create a new ICEM.\n(2) The content (e.g. time of measurement or respective ice conditions) has to be altered by the editor in line with chapter 6 of the NtS Encoding Guide for editors. The date and time of measurement could also be altered by the application according to national definitions.\n(3) When an NtS editor/publisher triggers the publish action:\n(a) it is checked if all mandatory content is provided in line with the NtS XSD (if not, go back to (2));\n(b) the nts_number is generated by the NtS application:\n(i) the ‘organisation’ stays unchanged;\n(ii) the ‘year’ stays unchanged;\n(iii) the ‘number’ stays unchanged;\n(iv) the ‘serial number’ is incremented (increased by 1);\n(c) ‘date_issue’ is automatically filled with the actual date/time of publish action;\n(d) ‘validity_period’ — ‘date_start’ is automatically filled with the actual date of publication;\n(e) ‘validity_period’ — ‘date_end’ is automatically filled with the next day after the date of publication (unless it is ensured by national processes that messages will get a validity date end as soon as the information included in the message is not up-to-date any more).\n5.\nWERM basic considerations\nUsually WERM are created and published automatically based on information received from sensor equipment or information received from infrastructure. The date_start of validity_period has to be filled with present date (date_issue) and the date_end of validity_period has to be filled with the next day after date_issue.\nThe fairway section in WERM is indicated as a stretch between two points on the fairway, i.e. area of applicability of the weather station (gauge).\nDate and time of measurement/forecast have to be provided even if it is not mandatory in WERM messages.\nIn case of forecasts the ‘measure date’ is the date/time the forecast is valid for.\n5.1.\nFilling of nts_number section in the WERM\nIn NtS XSD 4.0 the NtS number is optional within WERM messages. If it is provided every number has to be unique (Organisation/Year/Number/Serial) per message type and it is up to the organisation providing the WERM to ensure unique numbers (it is not required to have consecutive numbers).\n5.2.\nFilling of WERM ‘weather_category_code’\nThe wind speed in ‘weather_category_code’ (values 0 to 12) shall be provided in line with the Beaufort scale published by the World Meteorological Organization in its Manual on Marine Meteorological Services ‘WMO-No 558’.\nThe visibility in ‘weather_category_code’ (values 13 to 22) shall be provided as defined in the following table:\nValue, meaning\nVisibility\nAdditional information\n13, thick fog\nbelow 50 metres\n14, dense fog\nbelow 100 metres\n15, moderate fog\nbelow 200 metres\n16, fog\nbelow 1 000 metres\nFog consists of water droplets.\n17, mist\nfrom 1 km to 4 km\nMist consists of water droplets. Mist is used in case of ‘dry fog’, this phenomenon usually takes place before sunrise.\n18, haze\nfrom 1 km to 4 km\nHaze consists of dry particles.\n19, light haze\nfrom 4 km to 10 km\n20, clear\nfrom 10 km to 20 km\n21, very clear\nno limitation of visibility\n22, no fog\n‘no fog’ is used to state that there is no fog depending on national/local requirements.\n6.\nFTM processes\nIn the NtS Encoding Guide for editors it is described under which circumstances an NtS editor creates a new FTM or updates an existing FTM. The following processes apply:\n6.1.\nNew FTM\n(1) NtS applications may offer NtS editors to:\n(a) use existing notices as draft upon creation of new FTM; and/or\n(b) use notice templates for certain situations.\n(2) The content (e.g. time of validity, limitations) has to be entered by the editor in line with chapters 3 and 4 of the NtS Encoding Guide for editors.\n(3) When an NtS editor/publisher triggers the publish action:\n(a) it is checked if all mandatory content is provided in line with the NtS XSD (if not go back to (2));\n(b) the nts_number is generated by the NtS application:\n(i) the ‘organisation’ is filled with the name or code of the responsible organisation depending on the role of the publishing user:\n(ii) the ‘year’ is filled with the current year;\n(iii) the next available ‘number’ is assigned, in case a dedicated number was entered by the NtS editor or an application process in step 2 it is taken over (given that (Organisation/Year/Number/Serial) is unique as explained in chapter 15.1;\n(iv) the ‘serial number’ 0 is assigned;\n(c) ‘date _issue’ is automatically filled with the actual date/time of publish action\n6.2.\nUpdate/withdrawal of an existing FTM\n(1) The respective published message has to be selected to be updated in the FTM editor tool, the original FTM has to be copied or altered in the DB (depending on national processes).\n(a) Expired FTM (which passed the validity_date_end) cannot be updated any more, if this is the case NtS editor has to create a new FTM.\n(b) The subject code ‘Notice withdrawn’ is only used if:\n(i) present date is before the validity_date_start. In case only the content of the field ‘additional information in national language’ may be altered, the coded content of the message (step 2) has to stay unchanged;\n(ii) the validity period already started and the new end date for all limitations is in the past. The end date of the limitation has to be set to the correct time.\n(c) If a notice is withdrawn the validity period date end always has to be set to date of withdrawal.\n(2) The content (e.g. time of validity, limitations) has to be altered by the editor in line with chapters 3 and 4 of the NtS Encoding Guide for editors.\n(3) When an NtS editor/publisher triggers the publish action:\n(a) it is checked if all mandatory content is provided in line with the NtS XSD (if not go back to (2));\n(b) the nts_number is generated by the NtS application:\n(i) the ‘organisation’ stays unchanged;\n(ii) the ‘year’ stays unchanged;\n(iii) the ‘number’ stays unchanged;\n(iv) the ‘serial number’ is incremented (increased by 1);\n(c) ‘date_issue’ is automatically filled with the actual date/time of publish action\n(d) FTM with subject code ‘Notice withdrawn’ shall not be considered for voyage planning (any more).\n6.3.\nWaterway and/or object related FTM\nA waterway related FTM contains information about one or several stretches of waterway. A waterway stretch is defined in the ‘fairway_section’ part by its begin and end ISRS Location Codes.\nAn object related FTM contains information about one or several specific objects on the waterway. An object is defined in the ‘object’ part by its ISRS Location Code.\nOne FTM has to refer\nto one or several fairway sections, or\nto one or several objects on one or several fairway sections.\n6.4.\nAutomatic ordering of limitation codes\nDifferent limitations have different impact on navigation. In order to allow display of the most severe limitation e.g. in an FTM list overview, the following order shall be considered starting with the most severe limitation having Rank 1:\nRank\nValue\nMeaning (EN)\n1\nOBSTRU\nblockage\n2\nPAROBS\npartial obstruction\n3\nNOSERV\nno service\n4\nSERVIC\nchanged service\n5\nVESDRA\nvessel draught\n6\nVESBRE\nvessel breadth\n7\nCONBRE\nconvoy breadth\n8\nVESLEN\nvessel length\n9\nCONLEN\nconvoy length\n10\nCLEHEI\nclearance height\n11\nVESHEI\nvessel air draught\n12\nAVALEN\navailable length\n13\nCLEWID\nclearance width\n14\nAVADEP\navailable depth\n15\nLEADEP\nleast depth sounded\n16\nDELAY\ndelay\n17\nALTER\nalternate traffic direction\n18\nTURNIN\nno turning\n19\nPASSIN\nno passing\n20\nOVRTAK\nno overtaking\n21\nNOBERT\nno berthing\n22\nNOMOOR\nno mooring\n23\nANCHOR\nno anchoring\n24\nSPEED\nspeed limit\n25\nWAVWAS\nno wash of waves\n26\nNOSHORE\nnot allowed to go ashore\n27\nMINPWR\nminimum power\n28\nCAUTIO\nspecial caution\n29\nNOLIM\nno limitation\n6.5.\nHandling of limitation period\nLimitations with the same limitation periods should be grouped/listed together/combined for display to keep it reader-friendly.\nNtS editor tools should provide a function for editors to avoid re-typing of limitation periods.\nAll limitations have to include a limitation period with an interval code in order to allow proper calculations within voyage planning applications. To ease the work of NtS editors the following functions may be implemented:\nThe NtS editor tool may provide a function to copy already entered limitations to avoid re-typing of the limitation period by the NtS editor.\nThe NtS editor tools may provide a function to select more than one limitation code for a specific limitation period and automatically create the required limitation sections based on the information entered by the NtS editor.\n‘Monday to Friday except public holidays’: The value ‘holidays’ is very difficult for voyage planning applications. A list of holidays for each country is needed for proper calculation. If no such list is available the respective limitations will be assigned to the public holidays nevertheless.\n‘with the exception of’: must not be used; Interrupted intervals have to be given as separate limitation periods within the same limitation, therefore this code shall not be displayed/available to notice editors.\nLogic and display of information applicable in case of interval code ‘continuous’:\n<date_start>2015-04-01+01</date_start>\n<date_end>2015-06-30+02</date_end>\n<time_start>06:00:00</time_start>\n<time_end>10:00:00</time_end>\n<interval_code>CON</interval_code>\nIf the interval_code is continuous the start_time belongs to the start_date and the end_time belongs to the end_date e.g. from 1 April 06:00 to 30 June 10:00\nLogic and display of information applicable in case of any other interval code than ‘continuous’:\n<date_start>2015-04-01+01</date_start>\n<date_end>2015-06-30+02</date_end>\n<time_start>06:00:00</time_start>\n<time_end>10:00:00</time_end>\n<interval_code>WRK</interval_code>\nIf the interval_code has another value the start_time and end_time belongs to this interval_code e.g. from 1 April to 30 June Monday to Friday from 06:00 to 10:00\nThe limitation time end always has to be filled in the last version of a message.\n7.\nGeneral implementation rules\nThe following is to be considered:\nThe table ‘GUI_labels’ provided in the NtS Reference Tables shall be considered when building NtS applications (search masks, e-mail subscription form, display of messages).\nThe date_end cannot be before date_start.\nCodes that have been disabled (are not to be used any more) via NtS change requests (see comments in the NtS XSD) shall not be displayed to NtS editors upon creation of new messages. The codes are still included in the NtS XSD enumerations for backwards compatibility.\n7.1.\nFilling of the ‘number_section’\nEvery number (Organisation/Year/Number/Serial) has to be unique per message type. That means that messages of different types can have the same NtS Number.\nFor users the message numbers are only relevant for FTM and ICEM, for all other message types display of the message number can be skipped depending on national requirements.\nTo users the message number shall be displayed in the following format ‘Message Type/Country/Organisation/Year/Number/Serial’ (it can be shortened depending on applied filters if no information gets lost).\n7.2.\nFilling of elements ‘from’, ‘originator’, ‘organisation’ and ‘source’\nThe element ‘from’ in the identification section is filled with the name of the national system that provides the message (e.g. ELWIS, DoRIS, SLOVRIS, FLARIS).\nThe element ‘originator’ is the organisation which enters the messages into the national systems.\nThe element ‘source’ is the authority for which the FTM are published.\nThe element ‘organisation’ within the nts_number section is the name of the organisation assigning the nts_number (NtS Provider).\n7.3.\nOmission of elements\nElements that would contain only standard or default values shall be omitted if they are conditional, they lead to message overhead with no added value.\nFollowing elements are concerned:\nTarget Group: target_group_code ALL with direction_code ALL (if there are no other specific target groups within the message),\nposition_code: AL,\nreason_code: OTHER.\n7.4.\nAutomatic filling of date_issue\nFTM and ICEM\nFor FTM and ICEM the value of date_issue element is the actual date and time of publishing. In case of updated messages date_issue is the date and time when the update was published.\nWRM and WERM\nFor WRM and WERM the value of date_issue element is the date and time of the processing request, because there can be several measurements with different issuing time stamps within one W(E)RM message.\n7.5.\nHandling of time zone information in NtS messages\nDate and time shall always be provided in local time including time zone information within the NtS XML messages.\nThe only exceptions from this provision are the ‘time_start’ and the ‘time_end’ within the ‘limitation_period’ section. This is because in the limitation section an interval can be applied. If date start and date end have different time regimes (e.g. CEST and CET) this would result in a change of the time zone information within this interval. This change cannot be expressed via a single limitation period. Instead of creating different limitation periods for each time change only a single limitation period without time zone information is used to reduce overhead in message processing and transmission.\n7.6.\nHandling of Seconds in NtS messages\nAs a general rule seconds have to be provided in (date)/time fields but shall not be displayed to NtS users. Minutes are sufficient for NtS granularity.\n7.7.\nFormat of decimals in NtS messages\nDecimals in numeric fields are indicated with a . (period). No thousand separators are used.\nThe number of decimals used for values shall be limited to a feasible amount to ensure user-friendly display.\n7.8.\nUnits to be used in NtS messages\nOnly cm, m3/s, h, km/h and kW, m/s (wind), mm/h (rain) and degree Celsius are allowed to be used as units within NtS messages, applications may convert the units for user friendliness.\nIn case the input units differ from the standardised units the entered values have to be converted by the application accordingly.\n7.9.\nRules for the elements ‘name’, ‘position_code’ and ‘type_code’\nThe element ‘name’ shall be prefilled automatically from the RIS Index reference data ‘national object name’ (NtS editors might amend the prefilled name if this is a national requirement). Naming conventions for object names are included in the RIS Index Encoding Guide version 2.0 or higher. Examples for proper object names are also given in the NtS Encoding Guide for editors.\nThe type code is added to the object by the NtS application in front of the object name.\nThe position of objects is encoded via position code and added to the object by the NtS application out of the RIS Index. Editors may change prefilled type and position codes. An object position code shall not be provided for geo_objects in the fairway_section.\nA full object name is composed of its position code, type code and name.\nTo ease the work of NtS editors the following mapping may be implemented in NtS editor tools supporting editors in finding / selecting the proper objects based on the RIS Index function_code or the NtS type_code:\nTable 1\nMatching ‘RIS Index function_code’ — ‘NtS type_code’\nFunction Code\nFunction Code Meaning\nType Code\nType Code Meaning\n—\n—\nBUAARE\nE.1.1\nBuilt-Up Areas\nto be selected by editor\nBUISGL\nE.1.2\nBuilding of Navigational Significance\nto be selected by editor\nbrgare\nG.1.1 - G.1.6\nBridge Area [C_AGGR()]\nBRI\nbridge\nbridge_5\nG.1.1\nBascule Bridge\nBRO\nbridge opening\nbridge_1\nG.1.2\nBridges with Bridge Arches\nBRO\nbridge opening\nbridge_1\nG.1.3\nFixed Bridge\nBRO\nbridge opening\nbridge_4\nG.1.4\nLift Bridge\nBRO\nbridge opening\nbridge_12\nG.1.5\nSuspension Bridge\nBRO\nbridge opening\nbridge_3\nG.1.6\nSwing Bridge\nBRO\nbridge opening\ncblohd\nG.1.8\nOverhead Cable\nCAB\ncable overhead\npipohd\nG.1.9\nOverhead Pipe\nPPO\npipeline overhead\nbridge_7\nG.1.12\nDrawbridge\nBRO\nbridge opening\nbunsta\nG.3.2\nBunker / Fuelling Station\nBUS\nBunker / Fuelling Station\ncranes\nG.3.4\nCrane\nto be selected by editor\nhrbare\nG.3.9\nHarbour Area\nHAR\nharbour\nhrbbsn\nG.3.10\nHarbour Basin\nHAR\nharbour\nponton\nG.3.11\nLanding Stage, Pontoon\nto be selected by editor\nmorfac\nG.3.12\nMooring Facility\nMOO\nmooring facility\nhulkes\nG.3.14\nPermanently Moored Vessel or Facility\nto be selected by editor\nprtare\nG.3.15\nPort Area\nHAR\nharbour\nrefdmp\nG.3.17\nRefuse Dump\nREF\nrefuse dump\ntermnl\nG.3.19\nTerminal\nTER\nterminal\ntrm01\nG.3.19\nRORO-terminal\nTER\nterminal\ntrm03\nG.3.19\nFerry-terminal\nTER\nterminal\ntrm07\nG.3.19\nTanker-Terminal\nTER\nterminal\ntrm08\nG.3.19\nPassenger Terminal\nTER\nterminal\ntrm10\nG.3.19\nContainer Terminal\nTER\nterminal\ntrm11\nG.3.19\nBulk Terminal\nTER\nterminal\nvehtrf\nG.3.20\nVehicle Transfer Location\nBER\nberth\nlokbsn\nG.4.3\nLock Basin\nLKB\nlock basin\nlkbspt\nG.4.4\nLock Basin Part\nLKB\nlock basin\nlokare\nG.4.3 / G.4.4\nLock Area [C_AGGR()]\nLCK\nlock\nexcnst\nG.4.8\nExceptional Navigational Structure\nSLI\nship lift\nTUN\ntunnel\nCBR\ncanal bridge\ngatcon\nG.4.9\nOpening Barrage\nBAR\nweir\nFLO\nflood gate\nwtwgag\nI.3.4\nWaterway Gauge\nGAU\ntide gauge\nFERYRT_2\nL.2.1\nCable Ferry\nFER\nferry\nFERYRT_1\nL.2.2.\nFree Moving Ferry\nFER\nferry\nferyrt_4\nL.2.3.\nSwinging Wire Ferry\nFER\nferry\ndismar\nL.3.2\nDistance Mark along Waterway Axis\nRIV\nriver\nachare\nM.1.1\nAnchorage Area\nANC\nanchoring area\nachbrt\nM.1.2\nAnchorage Berth\nBER\nberth\nberths_3\nM.1.3\nBerth / Fleeting Areas\nBER\nberth\nberths_1\nM.1.4\nTranshipment Berth\nBER\nberth\ntrnbsn\nM.4.5\nTurning Basin\nTUR\nturning basin\nCAN\ncanal\nFWY\nfairway\nrdocal\nQ.2.1\nRadio Calling-In Point (notification point)\nREP\nreporting point\nchkpnt\nR.1.1\nCheck Point\nBCO\nborder control\nsistat_8\nR.2.1\nTraffic Sistat — Bridge Passage\nSIG\nsignal station\nsistat_6\nR.2.2\nTraffic Sistat — Lock\nSIG\nsignal station\nsistat_10\nR.2.3\nTraffic Sistat — Oncoming Traffic Indicator\nSIG\nsignal station\nsistat_2\nR.2.4\nTraffic Sitat — Port Entry and Departure\nSIG\nsignal station\npas\nPassage Points\nto be selected by editor\nriscen\nRIS centre\nVTC\nvessel traffic centre\nspecon\nSpecial Construction\nto be selected by editor\ntrafp\nTraffic Points (first reporting points)\nREP\nreporting point\njunction\nWaterway node / end of waterway / Junction\nto be selected by editor\nwaypt\nWaypoint\nto be selected by editor\nLegend:\ngreen\nDirect match (1:1 relation)\nyellow\nmatching example, other TypeCodes possible (1:n relation)\nblue\nno direct match / to be selected by editor\n7.10.\nRules for the element ‘fairway_name’\nTo avoid application logic / necessity of proper reference data at the receiving system (software displaying the notice to the user) the optional element ‘fairway_name’ shall always be included in the ‘geo_object’ and automatically filled by the NtS application with the ‘Waterway name’ from the RIS Index. NtS editors shall not alter the content of the element fairway_name.\n7.11.\nClarifications for translations in the spreadsheet ‘reference_code’\nThe following definition shall be used for reference_code values provided in the NtS Reference Tables:\nNAP: In the Netherlands the abbreviation NAP is used and understood, NAP is not translated\nKP: ‘channel level’ shall be translated thus provided in national language\nFZP: only the abbreviation ‘FZP’ shall be used (nowadays hardly used anymore)\nADR: ‘Adriatic Sea’ shall be translated thus provided in national language\nTAW/DNG: ‘Tweede algemene waterpassing’ (Dutch) — ‘Deuzième Nivellement Général’ (French) is the reference height used in Belgium to express height measurements. 0 is the average sea water level at low water in Oostende\nDutch: TAW\nFrench: DNG\nAll other Languages: TAW/DNG\nLDC: ‘low navigable water level Danube Commission’ shall be translated thus provided in national language\nHDC: ‘high navigable water level Danube Commission’ shall be translated thus provided in national language\nETRS: ‘European Terrestrial Reference System 1989’ the abbreviation ‘ETRS89’ is used in all languages.\n7.12.\nRecommendation for the element ‘coordinate’\nAlthough the element coordinate within the geo object section is conditional, the geo coordinates shall be given in WGS84 in format [d]d mm.mmm[m] N (latitude) and [d][d]d mm.mmm[m] E (longitude). This is to refer the NtS messages geographically.\n7.13.\nHandling of target groups\nThe target group section consists of target group code and direction code. If both have the value ALL the whole section shall be omitted if there are no other specific target groups within the message. If just one of these two is given the other must be filled with the default value ALL because both elements are mandatory.\nFurther information concerning target groups can be found in the NtS Encoding Guide for editors.\n7.14.\nDisplay of valid messages at a given time\nThe validity_period shall be used by applications to select the messages, which are to be displayed to users for a requested time.\nIf subject_code is INFSER (Info service) the validity period is used to specify the time the Info service Message is displayed to the users, not for the period of validity of the provided information (e.g. 1 month).\n7.15.\nOptional functions to increase user friendliness of NtS editor tools\nThe following functions may be offered to NtS editors depending on national requirements:\nNtS applications may offer NtS editors to save draft NtS messages (not all mandatory content has to be provided in order to save draft messages)\nDifferent user roles may apply to different editors (e.g. editors that are allowed to enter/alter notices, publishers that are allowed to publish notices (in addition to editing)\n8.\nNtS XML Message Structure\nThe NtS XML Message Structure and the content and purpose of data elements are defined and further explained in Appendix C: NtS XML Schema Definition (XSD).\n9.\nNtS Web Service\n9.1.\nObjective\nThe NtS Expert Group identified the web service technology as an appropriate means to provide the Notices to Skippers.\nThis chapter constitutes the specification of the web service for the provision of the Notices to Skippers, short NtS Web Service. Particular emphasis was placed on the use of well-established international standards.\nOne goal of the conceptual design was to ensure a good balance between flexibility and robustness of the resulting web service. The filter parameters provided in the requests are essentially the criteria specified in the NtS standard (waterway section with optional river km, time of validity, date of publication of the notice). This seems sufficiently expressive considering the use cases of the web service and at the same time limits the complexity of the implementation.\nThe core result is a contract for the web service, in which the requests and responses are specified. The consumers of the web service can rely on this contract and the providers have to comply with it. This contract is specified using the international standard WSDL.\nEvery participating Member State shall implement one or more web services for the different message types of the NtS (FTM, WRM, ICEM, WERM) and provide them via the internet (‘NtS Message Service’),\nThe technical details of the implementation of the NtS WS, e.g. choice of appropriate data pools, applications and platforms, are not in the scope of this specification and are in the responsibility of each individual participating Member State.\nIn order to define a secure communication one has to consider various security aspects and protection objectives. Depending on the circumstances not all of these aspects have to be considered. The priority of the various security aspects and the degree of their fulfilment can vary. Also the feasibility of a certain measure can be limited by the capabilities of the technical implementation. In the context of NtS all information are public. So there is no need to secure the NtS data themselves in terms of data protection. Therefore every provider has to decide on its own in how far this aspect will be implemented in its service.\n9.2.\nBasic Principles and constraints\n9.2.1.\nWeb standards\nThe NtS Web Service has to comply with the WS-I Basic Profile 1.1. This profile ‘provides interoperability guidance for a core set of non-proprietary web services specifications, such as SOAP, WSDL and UDDI’. The most relevant standards herein are\nXML Schema Definition (XSD),\nSimple Object Access Protocol (SOAP),\nWeb Services Description Language (WSDL), and\nUniversal Description, Discovery and Integration (UDDI).\nThe response message of the NtS WS is an NtS message which is defined in XML Schema Definition (XSD) in Appendix C of this Commission Regulation.\nSOAP is an application protocol for data transmission among IT-Systems and is standardised by the World Wide Web Consortiums (W3C).\nThe specific elements for the NtS Web Service are defined inline in the corresponding WSDL specifications in Appendix D of this Commission Regulation. The schema of the NtS standard (XSD) is included with an import statement.\nUDDI (Universal Description, Discovery and Integration) is noted here as a central, possibly international registry for web services, where the NtS Web Service could be registered. In this registry potential consumers of the web service could search and find the service. But since the potential providers of the NtS Web Service are limited by the participating Member States and the WSDL specification is an integral part of the standard, the need for an independent registration of the NtS Web Service is not apparent.\n9.2.2.\nInteraction model and encoding method for NtS WS\nThe encoding method Document-literal wrapped is used for the NtS Web Service, because it allows for validation against an XML schema and the operation names defined in the WSDL specification are used directly as XML tag names in the SOAP messages.\n9.3.\nGeneral specifications and recommendations\n9.3.1.\nSpecification: Version information\nThe version information of the NtS Web Service consists of two sections:\nversion of the web service itself,\nversion of the NtS schema used by the web service.\nThe section of the web service itself consists of two parts:\nmajor version of the web service,\nminor version of the web service.\nThe major version is given as a positive integer denoting the major version of the web service.\nThe minor version is given as a non-negative integer denoting the minor version of the web service within the major version.\nThe section of the NtS schema contains the version of the NtS schema as defined by the NtS Expert Group.\nHence, the version of the NtS Web Service specified here is 2.0.4.0, where 2.0 is the version of the web service itself and 4.0 is the version of the NtS schema used.\nExplicit version information is not necessary in the requests or responses of the NtS Web Service. There are only a few versions of the services expected to be online at the same time. Different versions shall be provided with different URLs. Hence, each instance of an NtS Web Service implementation shall support one specific version of the NtS Web Service.\n9.3.2.\nSpecification: Structure of namespaces\nThe namespaces in the NtS Web Service are based on the web domain of the RIS Expert Groups, http://www.ris.eu/\nThe namespaces contain a particle indicating the corresponding service and version information. Hence, the service specified here uses the following namespace:\nNtS Message Service: http://www.ris.eu/nts.ms/2.0.4.0\n9.3.3.\nRecommendation: Use of namespaces\nFor higher transparency of XML documents it is recommended to define namespaces in the outmost suitable element in the schemas as well as the instance documents and not to use local namespace definitions in nested elements.\n9.3.4.\nRecommendation: Use of namespace prefixes\nRequests and responses in the NtS Web Service shall use XML elements in qualified form, i.e. with an explicit namespace prefix, and XML attributes in unqualified form, i.e. without a namespace prefix.\nIt is recommended to use intuitive namespace prefixes like ‘nts’ for better human readability.\n9.3.5.\nSpecification: Use of ISRS Location Codes\nThe ISRS Location Code is explained in chapter 2 of the NtS Encoding Guide for application developers as well as the RIS Index Encoding Guide.\nQuerying an NtS Web Service, the client can reference various objects, e.g. fairway sections, gauges or locks. If the corresponding parameters, the id elements, are used, they must contain ISRS Location Codes. These parameters are typically given in id elements, each containing one or two ids.\nWhen using these parameters, the following general conventions have to be observed:\nISRS Location Codes have to be submitted as full-length 20-character codes, i.e. without truncating trailing zeros,\nIf two ids are used within an id element, both ISRS Location Codes have to refer to the same waterway. This means, that the codes include some identical digits located in the fairway_section part of the ISRS Location Code. The fairway section code together with the fairway hectometre defines a waterway stretch provided as pair of id elements.\nFor the provision of waterway stretches (id element pairs within the fairway_section geo_object) in NtS messages, the following has to be considered with respect to the ISRS Location Codes:\ndigits 1 to 2 (Country code):\nhave to be identical within the id pair, but\ndifferent country codes may be defined within one id pair in case neighbouring countries are using the same fairway section code for a specific waterway and the same system for defining the hectometres,\ndigits 3 to 5 (UN Location code):\nare not relevant, may contain different content within the id pair,\ndigits 6 to 10 (Fairway section code):\nhave to be identical within the id pair, but\n[exception]: in case of using the Belgian ISRS codes within NtS WS, one should use only digits 6 to 8 to identify the fairway section, because NtS messages will be published across different sections within one fairway,\ndigits 11 to 15 (Object Reference Code).\nare not relevant, may contain different content within the id pair,\ndigits 16 to 20 (Fairway Hectometre):\nconsist of five numerical digits defining the hectometre thus will usually contain different content within the id pair. Example: ‘00235’ for fairway km 23,5; ‘00001’ for fairway km 0,1,\n[exception]: in case of the Netherlands there is not always a direct connection between the Fairway hectometre and the physical kilometre of the fairway due to the definition of the start of the fairway stretch in the network model and in the real world, in such cases the Object Reference Code for objects of the type ‘dismar’ starts with Kxxxx (xxxx includes the physical kilometre, e.g. NLSVG00130K000300191 (km 3)). But for other types of objects there is no direct relation to the physical fairway km in the ISRS codes, e.g. the bridge of Sas van Gent on the same fairway at km 2,5 has the ISRS code NLSVG001300521600186. For the Kanaal Gent-Terneuzen the physical km 0,0 starts at the border of Belgium and the Netherlands and the Fairway Hectometre 0,0 starts at the beginning of the canal in Gent.\nIn case a message touches more than one waterway or fairway sections all fairway sections have to be defined by their begin- and end-point in separate ‘fairway_section’ XML elements.\nFor some countries/regions it is required to build filter functionality. For example if ISRS Location Code (1-2) is BE use ISRS Location Code (6-8) as the ID for linear referencing with the fairway hectometre (ISRS Location Code 16-20). Examples for fairway stretches (valid id element pairs within the fairway_section) that include above defined exceptions:\nThe two NL ISRS Location Codes are a valid definition of a waterway stretch (showing NL exception with respect to the kilometre of the fairway): NLSVG00130K000300191 (km 3,0 at Sas van Gent on the Kanaal Gent-Terneuzen) — NLWDP00130K000400200 (km 4,0 at Westdorpe on the Kanaal Gent-Terneuzen),\nThe two BE ISRS Location Codes are a valid definition of a waterway stretch (showing BE exception with respect to the fairway section code (‘020’ Albertkanaal)): BEGNK02016L010100414 (lock of Genk located at km 41,4 on the Albert Canal) — BEOSH02033L010500772 (lock of Ham located at km 77,2 on the Albert Canal).\nThe following figure shows counter-examples of ISRS Location Code usage for each of the general conventions (no exceptions to the general conventions apply to SK waterway stretches):\nInvalid ISRS Location Code queries\nGeneral remark: A service to query valid ISRS Location Codes is not supported by the NtS Web Service. The ISRS Location Codes are provided within the European Reference Data Management System (ERDMS).\nThe correct usage of ISRS Location Codes in queries and their interpretation is given in the following five cases.\nCase 1: No ids element in request\nThe ids element is an optional part of the request, i.e. a query without any ids elements is allowed:\nValid query without ids parameter\nIf no ids element is given, all messages shall be returned (depending, of course, on other filter criteria like validity_period or dates_issue).\nCase 2: One id element in request\nEach ids element can contain one or two id elements. The case of one id element is shown in the following figure:\nValid query with one id parameter\nIf such a query is received, the server shall return all matching messages with a start hectometre ≤ the given value (240,7 in the example) and an end hectometre ≥ this value. The figure below depicts this selection of messages: The position queried lies between the start and end hectometre values of messages 1, 3 and 4, which would be returned. Messages 2, 5 and 6 do not overlap with the query position, so they would not be returned.\nIf the given ISRS Location Code denotes a singular object, e.g. a gauge or a lock, the web service should return the messages involving this object.\nMatching and not matching messages for one id parameter\nCase 3: Two id elements in request\nEach ids element can contain one or two id elements. The case of two id elements is shown in the following figure:\nValid query with two id parameters\nAll hectometre values queried shall be treated as valid, even if the corresponding fairway section has different start or end points. For instance, if the fairway section starts at hectometre 100,0 and ends at hectometre 300,0, a request querying hectometres 20,0 up to 400,0 would be valid. Internally, of course, only the ‘real’ extent of the fairway section is searched.\nDoing so also enables the search for all messages on a fairway without knowing its exact hectometre range (one would send its ISRS Location Code with hectometres set to ‘00000’ or ‘99999’ respectively).\nAll matching messages intersecting the given hectometre interval shall be returned. The following diagram illustrates this situation:\nMatching and not matching messages for two id parameters\nThe figure above shows, how ‘intersecting’ is defined. While the extents of the messages 1 to 4 overlap with the extent of the queried hectometre range (partially or completely), the extents of messages 5 and 6 do not, therefore messages 1 to 4 will be returned, 5 and 6 will not be returned.\nThe technical condition for a message to intersect with an interval [A, B] is: The start hectometre of the message is ≤ B and its end hectometre is ≥ A.\nCombination: Multiple ids elements in request\nValid query with multiple ids elements\nThe combination of several ids elements in the request leads to a union of the corresponding messages. All the ids elements are treated individually and a message will be returned, if it matches at least one of them. Therefore, the following messages would be returned for the given example:\nAll messages for the object with the ISRS Location Code SKXXX0000010000***** with start hectometre =0 and end hectometre ≥ 0 (see Case 2)\nAll messages for the object with the ISRS Location Code SKXXX0000500000***** which intersect the hectometre interval [11,0, 15,0] (see Case 3)\nAll messages for the object with the ISRS Location Code SKXXX0000200000***** with start hectometre ≤ 110,5 and end hectometre ≥ 110,5 (see Case 2)\nAll messages for the object with the ISRS Location Code SKXXX0000500000***** which intersect the hectometre interval [220,0, 300,0] (see Case 3)\n9.4.\nNtS Message Service (implementation specification)\nIn this chapter the implementation specification of the NtS message service is given, deduced from the considerations and choices in the preceding chapters.\nThe NtS message service provides the four types of messages in the NtS:\n1.. NtS FTM (fairway and traffic related message)\n2.. NtS WRM (water related message)\n3.. NtS ICEM (ice message)\n4.. NtS WERM (weather related message)\nAn implementation of the NtS message service can support all message types or just a selection. It is allowed that a participating Member State provides more than one service for a specific message type, that complement each other.\n9.4.1.\nRequest\nIn order to achieve a maximum robustness of the service while keeping the complexity on a low level no additional query language is used for the NtS Web Service. Instead the constructs provided by WSDL itself are applied. The specific operations together with their parameters are specified entirely within the WSDL specification. In the case of the NtS Message Service a single operation is defined.\nThe subject-specific filter criteria are taken from the NtS standard, but extended concerning multiplicity of the parameters:\ntype of message (compulsory; one of ‘FTM’, ‘WRM’, ‘ICEM’, ‘WERM’),\nspecific waterway sections or parts thereof, or specific objects (optional; described by single ISRS Location Codes and/or pairs of ISRS Location Codes),\ntime of validity (optional; start date and end date),\ndate of publication of the notice (optional; single dates and/or intervals of dates).\nOnly the messages matching the given criteria are returned by the service.\nPaging mechanism\nIn order to control the amount of data a paging mechanism is supported. The paging parameter is defined with a complex type containing the following elements:\noffset: serial number of the first returned message (integer ≥ 0),\nlimit: max. number of messages (integer ≥ 0),\ntotal count: flag, if total number of messages shall be returned (Boolean value).\nThe complex paging parameter is optional, but if it is present, all elements within have to be given. Then, the paging mechanism works in the following way:\nThe total number of messages will not exceed the value of the parameter limit, with the exception that a value of 0 means ‘no limit’. The response skips as many messages as defined in the parameter offset. In order to provide this mechanism, the service has to observe a temporarily stable (but otherwise arbitrary) sequence of the messages, e.g. between two updates of message data on the underlying data set of the web service. This means that two consecutive identical calls must return the same messages in the same order. The parameter total count determines whether the response shall provide the total number of messages matching the subject-specific criteria. Usually it should be sufficient to request this information with the first response, but omit it in all consecutive responses. This should result in a better performance of the web service.\nThe paging mechanism provides a means to request the messages iteratively in ‘pages’. In order for the paging mechanism to work properly, the same subject-specific parameters have to be provided in each call.\n9.4.2.\nResponse\nIn case of a successful request the NtS Web Service response contains the NtS messages that match the request parameters. The NtS messages have to comply with the NtS schema and can be validated against that schema. Since the message type is a compulsory request parameter, each response can contain only NtS messages of the same message type, FTM, WRM, ICEM or WERM respectively.\nIf the service detects errors while processing the request it can return an arbitrary number of error messages, using the error codes listed in the following subchapter.\nOne response of an NtS Web Service can contain NtS messages and error messages at the same time.\nOptional paging information is returned if the request contained paging parameters. In this case the offset and number of contained messages are mandatory, the total count needs only be present if it has been requested.\nPlease note: It is assumed that the communication between the web service and the user is technically established, i.e. the service receives the request and the user receives the corresponding response. Technical errors, e.g. breakdown of the internet connection or inaccessibility of the web service due to maintenance or crash, are not considered here. Only error situations that happen ‘behind’ the web service layer from the users point of view are considered here.\nError messages\nThe error codes for the expected error situations are given below, together with an explanation. Only the error code is contained in the response, which is the usual procedure in the XML schema of the NtS.\nError codes for the NtS message service\nCode\nDescription\nExplanation\ne010\nmessage type not supported\nweb service does not support the requested message type\ne030\npaging parameters inconsistent with messages\nparameters for paging mechanism do not fit the available messages, e.g. Offset >= Total Count\ne100\nsyntax error in request\nrequest violates the schema for requests; can be specified in more detail by further e1xx-Codes\ne110\nincorrect message type\ngiven message type is not known\ne120\nincorrect type-specific parameters\ntype-specific parameters are erroneous\ne130\nincorrect paging parameters\ngiven parameters for the paging mechanism are erroneous\ne200\noperation not known\nthe requested operation is unknown\ne300\ndata source unavailable\ndata source of the web service for the NtS data is temporarily unavailable (technical problem)\ne310\ntoo many results for request,\nserver is unable to handle number of results\n9.5.\nGeneration of services and clients\nIf the contract-first approach is consequently observed, i.e. one or more contracts with complete descriptions of the interfaces are given in the form of WSDL documents, an implementation of the service(s) as well as an implementation of a corresponding client can be automatically generated using appropriate software tools. In an ideal situation no manual changes have to be made in the generated source code.\nHowever, in most cases several iterations are necessary until the WSDL specification meets the precise requirements of such a tool. Typically the tool makes individual demands on the use of the WSDL standard in order to work smoothly. As a consequence changes to the WSDL specification may be necessary, although the WSDL specification was a valid specification according to the WSDL standard in the first place. If the WSDL specification of the web service is changed after the service or the client have been generated, a new generation process may be necessary, depending on the changes made.\nGlossary\nTerm\nExplanation\nID\nIdentification\nISRS Location Code\n‘International Ship Reporting Standard’ Location Code\nNtS\nNotices to Skippers\nRIS\nRiver Information Services\nSOAP\nSimple Object Access Protocol; network protocol typically used for web services\nUDDI\nUniversal Description, Discovery and Integration; Standard for registry services in the context of web services\nUN\nUnited Nations\nURL\nUniform Resource Locator; location of a network resource typically used for internet addresses\nWGS 84\nWorld Geodetic System 1984\nWS\nWeb Service; service that provides its interfaces in the internet and is used by internet communication\nWSDL\nWeb Services Description Language; standard for the specification of web services\nWS-I\nWeb Services Interoperability Organisation; industry consortium with the objective to support interoperability of web services\nXML\nExtensible Markup Language; meta language for the structured and platform independent representation of data\nXSD\nXML Schema Definition; standard to specify the structure of XML documents",
  "extent": "E+W+S+N.I.",
  "status": null,
  "version": "current",
  "annotations": [
    {
      "type": "footnote",
      "label": "f1",
      "text": "Description cited from the WS-I Website: http://www.ws-i.org"
    }
  ],
  "outstanding_effects": [],
  "provenance": {
    "source": "legislation.gov.uk",
    "source_url": "https://www.legislation.gov.uk/eur/2018/2032/annex/appendix/B",
    "retrieved_at": "2026-11-01T14:43:42.938213+00:00"
  },
  "licence": "Open Government Licence v3.0",
  "licence_url": "https://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/version/3/",
  "attribution": "Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Source: legislation.gov.uk, The National Archives."
}