{
  "url": "https://openlegislation.uk/eu-regulation-2020-568/introduction",
  "json_url": "https://openlegislation.uk/eu-regulation-2020-568/introduction.json",
  "legislation": "eur/2020/568",
  "legislation_title": "Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/568 of 23 April 2020 making the exportation of certain products subject to the production of an export authorisation",
  "legislation_url": "https://openlegislation.uk/eu-regulation-2020-568",
  "path": "introduction",
  "kind": "introduction",
  "number": null,
  "heading": "Introductory text",
  "text": "Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/568\nof 23 April 2020\nmaking the exportation of certain products subject to the production of an export authorisation\nTHE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,\nHaving regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,\nHaving regard to Regulation (EU) 2015/479 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 March 2015 on common rules for exports, and in particular Article 6 thereof,\nWhereas:\n(1)\nOn 15 March 2020, the European Commission published Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/402 making the exportation of certain products subject to the production of an export authorisation, pursuant to Article 5 of Regulation (EU) 2015/479. That Regulation was amended by Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/426 of 19 March 2020.\n(2)\nRegulation (EU) 2020/402, and its amendment, apply for a limited period of 6 weeks.\n(3)\nAs the epidemiological crisis caused by the COVID-19 disease continues, the demand within the Union for personal protective equipment (‘PPE’), which consists of protective masks (and surgical masks), gloves, goggles, face-shields, and overalls, remains very high and is even continuously increasing. The demand for certain types of PPE has especially led to shortages on the internal market. Given its nature and the prevailing circumstances, such type of equipment is an essential product since it is necessary to prevent the further spreading of the disease, and safeguard the health of medical staff treating infected patients.\n(4)\nContinuous efforts are being made to help ensuring urgent and adequate provision of protective equipment throughout the EU. The production capacities of personal protective equipment have been ramped-up. The Commission finalised a joint procurement for personal protective equipment, in which 25 Member States took part. These initiatives are proving successful, and equipment is planned to be made available 2 weeks after the Member States sign the contracts with the bidders.\n(5)\nUnder the Union Civil Protection Mechanism (UCPM), the European Commission has decided to create a strategic rescEU stockpile of medical equipment such as ventilators and protective masks to help EU countries in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic. Entirely financed by the Commission via direct grants, this reserve will be hosted in one or several Member States.\n(6)\nThe Commission also set up a Clearing House, including for PPE, with the objective to coordinate efforts to match supply and demand in the EU, and facilitate an adequate functioning of the internal market.\n(7)\nDespite these actions, and given increased needs for PPE in the Union, a gap between demand and supply within the Union still exists, in particular concerning certain types of PPE, which are vital to prevent the spreading of the disease and treat the patients.\n(8)\nIn light of these efforts to overcome the critical situation of shortage of certain types of PPE in the Union, further measures are warranted to contribute to remedying and preventing shortages of PPE.\n(9)\nThese measures, aimed at protecting health and impacting on trade, should be targeted, proportionate, transparent and temporary.\n(10)\nIn a Joint Statement of 26 March the members of the European Council underlined that the adoption of the decision on the authorisation for export of PPE should lead to the full and effective lifting of all forms of internal bans or restrictions.\n(11)\nIt is not the intention of the Union to restrict exports any more than absolutely necessary, and the Union also wishes to uphold the principle of international solidarity in this situation of a global pandemic. Union measures should therefore be proportionate and ensure that exports remain possible, subject to a prior authorisation. To this effect, Member States should grant export authorisations under specific circumstances, where the shipment in question poses no threat to the actual need for PPE within the Union and serves to satisfy a legitimate need for official or professional medical use in a third country. In contrast, Member States should not authorise exports that would create speculative distortion and serve stockpiling and hoarding of essential equipment by those with little or no objective need.\n(12)\nAn export authorisation system should remedy or prevent a situation of a shortage of essential products within the borders of the Union. The main objective of such system would be to protect public health within the Union.\n(13)\nThe administrative modalities for these authorisations should be left to the discretion of the Member States during the time of this temporary system.\n(14)\nBased on the principle of international solidarity, Member States should authorise exports to enable the provisions of emergency supplies in the context of humanitarian aid.\n(15)\nMember States should positively consider granting authorisations when the exports are destined to State bodies, public bodies and other bodies governed by public law and in charge of distributing or making PPE available to the persons affected by or at risk from COVID-19 or involved in combating the COVID-19 outbreak.\n(16)\nAuthorisations should be granted only to the extent that the volume of exports is not such that it poses a threat to the availability of PPE on the market of the Member State in question or elsewhere in the Union for the purpose of meeting the objective of this Regulation. For this purpose, Member States should contact the Clearing House established by the Commission before granting such an authorisation. Member States do however not have to contact the Clearing House in the case of authorisations for emergency supplies in the context of humanitarian aid.\n(17)\nIn deciding whether to grant an export authorisation, the Member States should also take into consideration the fulfilment of a supply obligation under joint procurement or rescEU by the Union and the Member States, the support of the activities of the World Health Organization (WHO), the support of EU-level coordinated responses to crisis situations or the request for assistance by third countries or international organisations.\n(18)\nThe degree of market integration for the products concerned between parts of the customs territory of the Union and other countries or territories, whether achieved under an arrangement establishing a free-trade area or for other reasons such as geographic proximity or historic ties, should also be considered. Likewise, it would be counterproductive to disrupt closely integrated value chains and distribution networks established on the basis of those arrangements or otherwise, in particular in the case of neighbouring countries and economies.\n(19)\nThis Regulation should apply to certain types of PPE. In order to ensure coherence, the description of the types of PPE subject to this authorisation system laid down by this Regulation should be aligned with the corresponding specifications of the equipment subject to the Joint Procurement, which has identified the specific needs in the Union. The CN codes should be given for information only.\n(20)\nThe objective of the Clearing House is to ensure adequacy of the supply to meet the demand for all types of PPE on the Union market. On that basis, a need may arise to review the scope of Annex I and products covered by this Regulation. A review of the scope should be based on a continuous assessment of needs of critical equipment related to the fight against COVID-19 and their potential shortages. Special attention should be given to the products covered by the Joint Procurement as well as requested under the Union Civil Protection Mechanism such as other types of PPE, ventilators and laboratory products (test kits).\n(21)\nThe single market for medical and personal protective equipment is closely integrated beyond the boundaries of the Union, and so are its production value chains and distribution networks. This is particularly the case of the member States of the European Free Trade Association, and the Western Balkans which are engaged in a process of deep integration with the Union. Subjecting exports of certain personal protection equipment to these countries to an export authorisation requirement would be counterproductive, given the close integration of the production value chains and distribution networks, when such equipment is an essential product necessary to prevent the further spreading of the disease and safeguard the health of medical staff treating infected patients. It is therefore appropriate to exclude such countries from the scope of application of this Regulation.\n(22)\nIt is likewise appropriate to exclude from the export authorisation requirement the overseas countries and territories listed in Annex II to the Treaty, as well as the Faeroe Islands, Andorra, San Marino, the Vatican City and Gibraltar, since they have a particular dependency on the metropolitan supply chains of the Member States to which they are attached or on the supply chains of neighbouring Member States, respectively.\n(23)\nThis Regulation should apply to exports of Union goods from the customs territory of the Union. Therefore countries that form part of that customs territory need not be exempted in order to receive unrestricted shipments from within the Union. This is the case notably for the Principality of Monaco. Conversely, territories of Member States specifically excluded from the customs territory of the Union should not fall under the requirement of export authorisation and should therefore be exempted as well. This concerns the territories of Büsingen, Heligoland, Livigno, Ceuta and Melilla. Likewise, exports to the continental shelf of a Member State or the exclusive economic zone declared by a Member State pursuant to UNCLOS should be exempted from the application of this regulation.\n(24)\nThe measures provided for in this Regulation should not apply to trade between the EU Member States. Pursuant to Article 127(3) of the Withdrawal Agreement, during the transition period, the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland is to be considered as a Member State, and not as a third country.\n(25)\nSome of the above-mentioned countries at present maintain export restrictions on personal protection equipment.\n(26)\nThe authorities of the countries and territories excluded from the export authorisation system should offer adequate guarantees that they will control their own exports of the products concerned, in order to avoid undermining the objective pursued by Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/402. The Commission should closely monitor this.\n(27)\nTo avoid undermining the objective pursued by this Regulation, the authorities of the excluded countries and territories should make such exports to the Union available.\n(28)\nTo assess the situation on a regular basis, and in order to ensure transparency and consistency Member States should report their decisions to grant or reject requests for export authorisations to the Commission. The Commission should make such information publicly available on a regular basis, due account being taken of their confidential nature.\n(29)\nPrior authorisation requirements are of an exceptional nature, should be targeted and of a limited duration. In order to ensure that the measures do not remain in place longer than is necessary, they should apply for a period of 30 days. Based on the development both in terms of the spreading of the COVID-19 disease and the adequacy between supply and demand, the Commission should review the situation on a regular basis and consider the need to shorten or extend the duration of the measures as needed.\n(30)\nThe measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Committee established by Article 3(1) of Regulation (EU) 2015/479,\nHAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:",
  "extent": "E+W+S+N.I.",
  "status": null,
  "version": "current",
  "annotations": [
    {
      "type": "footnote",
      "label": "f1",
      "text": "OJ L 83, 27.3.2015, p. 34."
    },
    {
      "type": "footnote",
      "label": "f2",
      "text": "Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/402 of 14 March 2020 making the exportation of certain products subject to the production of an export authorisation (OJ L 77 I, 15.3.2020, p. 1)."
    },
    {
      "type": "footnote",
      "label": "f3",
      "text": "Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/426 of 19 March 2020 amending Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/402 making the exportation of certain products subject to the production of an export authorisation (OJ L 84 I, 20.3.2020, p. 1)."
    },
    {
      "type": "footnote",
      "label": "f4",
      "text": "See Article 4(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 952/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 9 October 2013 laying down the Union Customs Code (OJ L 269, 10.10.2013, p. 1)."
    }
  ],
  "outstanding_effects": [],
  "provenance": {
    "source": "legislation.gov.uk",
    "source_url": "https://www.legislation.gov.uk/eur/2020/568/introduction",
    "retrieved_at": "2026-11-01T14:42:42.657888+00:00"
  },
  "licence": "Open Government Licence v3.0",
  "licence_url": "https://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/version/3/",
  "attribution": "Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Source: legislation.gov.uk, The National Archives."
}