OpenLegislation

Schedule 7 HOUSING BENEFIT AND COUNCIL TAX BENEFIT INDICATORS

Changes not yet applied. Later legislation changes this provision in ways not yet written into the text below:

Indicator NumberDescription of indicatorDetails of indicator
1Security: whether the authority has a written and pro-active strategy for combating fraud and error which embraces specified initiatives including those sponsored by the Department of Social Security, which is communicated regularly to all staff.

This indicator is to be determined by reference to a written security strategy prepared by the authority before 31st March of 2001, which commits it, as a minimum, to undertaking two of the following sets of activities, and the initiatives specified therein are observably in use:

  1. (1)

    operating a system of guidance entitled the “Verification Framework”f1 which is made available to local authorities by the Department of Social Security to improve accuracy and to prevent fraud and error from entering the benefit system;

  2. (2)

    operating a policy for prosecution which details the circumstances in which cases would be considered for prosecution or for the application of other sanctions, and which is observably complied with;

  3. (3)

    operating at least three of the following initiatives which are observably in use:

    1. (a)

      the Post Office is, on the application of the local authority, preventing social security post sent by or on behalf of the authority from being redirected in accordance with the provisions of Section 182A of the Social Security Administration Act 1992f2;

    2. (b)

      the local authority is periodically providing Housing Benefit and Council Tax Benefit claims data to the Department of Social Security for the purpose of electronic data-matching with Departmental benefit claims records (this service, which is made available by the Department, is known as the Housing Benefit Matching Service);

    3. (c)

      the local authority is a signatory to a current agreement with each local office of the Benefits Agency with which it liaises on matters concerning Housing Benefit and Council Tax Benefit which sets out the expectations and obligations of both sides for a minimum level of efficient liaison, and that agreement is based on the model national service level agreement drawn up by the Department of Social Security and representatives of the Local Authority Associations;

    4. (d)

      the local authority is a signatory to a current agreement with each local office of the Benefits Agency with which it liaises on matters concerning Housing Benefit and Council Tax Benefit which sets out the expectations and obligations of both sides for a minimum level of efficient counter-fraud activity, and that agreement is based on the model fraud service level agreement drawn up by the Department of Social Security and representatives of the Local Authority Associations.

2The average cost of handling a Housing Benefit or Council Tax Benefit claim, taking into account differences in the types of claim received.

This indicator is based on the costs which local authorities report they incur to administer Housing Benefit and Council Tax Benefit. The information used is that contained in the financial return made to the Secretary of State under section 168(1) of the Local Government Act 1972 on the “General Fund Services Revenue Account Return form”f3.

Definition of terms and guidance on measuring performance against this indicator are set out in Circular S1/2000 on Housing Benefit and Council Tax Benefitf4.

3

Speed of processing:

  1. (a)

    Average time for processing new claims.

This indicator measures the average processing time taken in respect of all new claims for which the date of determination is within the period being reported on. The time for each claim is measured from the date of receipt of the claim to the date of full determination.

Definitions of terms and guidance on measuring performance against this indicator are set out in The Housing Benefit and Council Tax Benefit Management Information System Guide for 2000–2001 produced by the Department of Social Security (the “2000–2001 Guide”)f5.

4

Speed of processing:

  1. (b)

    Average time for processing notifications of changes of circumstances.

This indicator measures the average processing time taken in respect of all written notifications of changes which require a re-determination for which the date of re-determination is within the period being reported on. The meaning of re-determination is limited to those cases where notifications affect the person’s right to benefit; or the amount of their benefit entitlement; or their right to receive payment of benefit.

Definitions of terms and guidance on measuring performance against this indicator are set out in the 2000–2001 Guide.

5

Speed of processing:

  1. (c)

    Percentage of renewal claims processed on time.

This indicator measures the number of renewal claims determined before the end of the existing benefit period as a percentage in respect of all renewal claims for which the date of determination is within the period being reported on.

Definitions of terms and guidance on measuring performance against this indicator are set out in the 2000–2001 Guide.

6

Accuracy of processing:

  1. (a)

    Percentage of cases for which the calculation of the amount of benefit due was correct on the basis of the information available for the determination for a sample of cases checked post-determination.

This indicator measures the percentage of cases within a random sample for which the calculation of benefit is found to be correct.

Definitions of terms and guidance on measuring performance against this indicator are set out in the 2000–2001 Guide and Circular S1/2000 on Housing Benefit and Council Tax Benefit.

7

Accuracy of processing:

  1. (b)

    The percentage of recoverable overpayments (excluding Council Tax Benefit) that were recovered in the year.

This indicator measures the value of cash recovered during the period being reported on as a percentage of the value of recoverable overpayments identified by the authority on or after 1st April 2000.

Definitions of terms and guidance on measuring performance against this indicator are set out in the 2000–2001 Guide.

8User satisfaction survey covering issues of accessibility, staffing issues such as helpfulness and communications and information including issues such as clarity or adequacy and timeliness of the information.The information used is that contained in the survey requirements specified for the Best Value Performance Indicator Number 80 (BVPI80) in Chapter 14 of Volume One of the DETR’s document entitled “Best Value and Audit Commission Performance Indicators for 2000/2001”f6.

Annotations

Footnotes

f1

The Verification Framework guidance is set out in nine circulars on Housing Benefit and Council Tax Benefit issued by the Department of Social Security to local authorities. These are Circular F6/98 (issued in March 1998), Circular F15/98 (issued in November 1998); Circular F20/98 (issued in December 1998); Circular A24/99 (issued in July 1999); Circular F17/99 (issued in August 1999); Circular A34/99 (issued in September 1999); Circular A36/99 (issued in September 1999); Circular A37/99 (issued in September 1999); and Circular A48/99 (issued in October 1999).

f2

1992 c. 5.

f3

1972 c. 70.

f4

Issued to local authorities, free of charge, by the Department of Social Security in March 2000.

f5

Issued to local authorities, free of charge, by the Department of Social Security in December 1999.

f6

Best Value and Audit Commission Performance Indicators for 2000/2001. Volume One: The Performance Indicators including the Audit Commission’s Publication of Information Direction (England). Published by the DETR, free of charge, in December 1999.