# The National Crime Agency (Complaints and Misconduct) Regulations 2013, Regulation 64: Power to discontinue an investigation

Extent: E+W

(1) The IOPC DG may by order require the discontinuance of the investigation of a complaint or matter if (whether on the application of the appropriate authority or otherwise) it appears to the IOPC DG that—
(a) the complaint or matter is of a description specified in paragraph (9); and
(b) discontinuance of the investigation is within the IOPC DG’s power.
(2) The appropriate authority that is investigating a complaint or matter may discontinue the investigation if it appears to that authority that—
(a) the complaint or matter is of a description specified in paragraph (9); and
(b) discontinuance of the investigation is not within the IOPC DG’s power.
(3) Before discontinuing an investigation or applying to the IOPC DG for an order requiring the discontinuance of an investigation, an appropriate authority shall—
(a) write to the complainant at his last known address—
(i) inviting the complainant to make representations in relation to the matter; and
(ii) allowing the complainant a period of 28 days, commencing on the day after the date of the letter, to do so; and
(b) have regard to any representations made by the complainant.
(4) Any application by an appropriate authority to the IOPC DG for an order that it discontinue an investigation shall be in writing and shall be accompanied by—
(a) a copy of the complaint; and
(b) a memorandum from the appropriate authority containing a summary of the investigation undertaken so far and explaining the reasons for the application to discontinue the investigation.
(5) The appropriate authority shall—
(a) send the complainant a copy of any such application on the same day as the day on which the application is sent to the IOPC DG; and
(b) supply any further information requested by the IOPC DG for the purpose of considering that application.
(6) The IOPC DG shall not require the discontinuance of an investigation in a case where there has been no application to do so by the appropriate authority unless the IOPC DG has consulted with that authority.
(7) Before requiring the discontinuance of an investigation under paragraph (1) in a case where there has been no application to do so by the appropriate authority, or discontinuing an investigation ... under paragraph (12), the IOPC DG shall—
(a) write to the complainant at the complainant’s last known address—
(i) inviting the complainant to make representations in relation to the matter; and
(ii) allowing the complainant a period of 28 days, commencing on the day after the date of the letter, to do so; and
(b) have regard to any representations made by the complainant.
(8) For the purposes of this paragraph—
(a) discontinuance of the investigation of a complaint is within the IOPC DG’s power if—
(i) the investigation is being undertaken by the appropriate authority on its own behalf and the complaint is one required to be referred to the IOPC DG under regulation 22; or
(ii) the investigation is under the supervision or management of the IOPC DG;
(b) discontinuance of the investigation of a matter other than a complaint is within the IOPC DG’s power if the investigation is under the supervision or management of the IOPC DG.
(9) For the purposes of paragraphs (1) and (2), a specified complaint or matter is one—
(a) in which the complainant refuses to co-operate to the extent that the relevant body considers that it is not reasonably practicable to continue the investigation;
(b) which the appropriate authority has determined is suitable for local resolution;
(c) which the relevant body considers is vexatious, oppressive or otherwise an abuse of the procedures for dealing with complaints, conduct matters or DSI matters;
(d) which is repetitious, as defined in regulation 20(3) or 30; or
(e) which the relevant body otherwise considers is such as to make it not reasonably practicable to proceed with the investigation.
(10) For the purposes of paragraph (9) “relevant body” means—
(a) the IOPC DG, in a case where discontinuance is within the IOPC DG’s power in accordance with paragraph (8); and
(b) the appropriate authority, in any other case.
(11) The IOPC DG shall not discontinue any investigation that is being carried out in accordance with regulation 44 except in any cases where the complaint, conduct matter or DSI matter under investigation falls within paragraph (9).
(12) Where the IOPC DG makes an order under this regulation or discontinues an investigation being carried out in accordance with regulation 44, the IOPC DG shall give notification of the discontinuance—
(a) to the appropriate authority;
(b) to every person entitled to be kept properly informed in relation to the subject matter of the investigation under regulation 14; and
(c) in a case where the investigation that is discontinued is an investigation of a complaint, to the complainant.
(13) Where the appropriate authority discontinues an investigation under paragraph (2), the appropriate authority shall give notification of the discontinuance—
(a) to every person entitled to be kept properly informed in relation to the investigation under regulation 14; and
(b) in a case where the investigation that is discontinued is an investigation of a complaint, to the complainant.
(14) Where an investigation of a complaint, recordable conduct matter or DSI matter is discontinued in accordance with an order under paragraph (1)—
(a) the IOPC DG may give the appropriate authority directions in accordance with paragraph (15);
(b) the IOPC DG may ... take any such steps of a description specified in paragraph (18) (with the exception of the step in paragraph (18)(c)) as the IOPC DG considers appropriate for purposes connected with the discontinuance of the investigation; and
(c) subject to the preceding paragraphs, neither the appropriate authority nor the IOPC DG shall take any further action in accordance with the provisions of these Regulations in relation to that complaint or matter.
(15) A direction given to an appropriate authority by the IOPC DG under paragraph (14)(a) may—
(a) require the appropriate authority to produce an investigation report on the discontinued investigation under regulation 66 and to take any subsequent steps under these Regulations;
(b) where the investigation concerned a complaint, require the appropriate authority to disapply the requirements of these Regulations as respects that complaint;
(c) in a case within paragraph (9)(b), require the appropriate authority to subject the complaint to local resolution;
(d) direct the appropriate authority to handle the matter in whatever manner (if any) that authority thinks fit.
(16) The appropriate authority shall comply with any directions given to it under paragraph (15).
(17) Where an investigation of a complaint, recordable conduct matter or DSI matter is discontinued in accordance with paragraph (2)—
(a) the appropriate authority may take any such steps of a description specified in paragraph (18) it considers appropriate for purposes connected with the discontinuance of the investigation; and
(b) subject to the preceding paragraphs, neither the appropriate authority nor the IOPC DG shall take any further action in accordance with the provisions of these Regulations in relation to that complaint or matter.
(18) For the purposes of paragraphs (14)(b) and (17)(a), the steps are—
(a) to produce an investigation report on the discontinued investigation and take any subsequent steps under these Regulations;
(b) where the investigation concerned a complaint, to disapply the requirements of these Regulations as respects that complaint;
(c) to subject the complaint to local resolution;
(d) to handle the matter in whatever manner the appropriate authority or (as the case may be) the IOPC DG thinks fit.
(19) The complainant shall have a right of appeal to the relevant appeal body against any decision by the appropriate authority under paragraph (2) to discontinue the investigation of the complaint.
(20) On an appeal under this regulation, subject to paragraphs (21) and (22), the relevant appeal body shall—
(a) determine whether any decision taken by the appropriate authority under this regulation should have been taken in the case in question; and
(b) if the relevant appeal body finds in the complainant’s favour, give such directions as the relevant appeal body thinks appropriate to the Permanent Secretary to the Home Office and the Director General as to the action to be taken for investigating the complaint;
and it shall be the duty of the Permanent Secretary to the Home Office and the Director General to comply with any directions given under paragraph (b).
(21) Paragraph (20) does not apply in a case where the Director General is—
(a) the person in respect of whose decision an appeal is made under this regulation, and
(b) the relevant appeal body in relation to the appeal.
(22) In such a case—
(a) the appeal shall determine whether any decision taken by the appropriate authority under this paragraph should have been taken in the case in question; and
(b) if the appeal finds in the complainant’s favour, the Director General must take such action as the Director General thinks appropriate for investigating the complaint.

---
Source: https://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2013/2325/regulation/64 (the official version)
Page: https://openlegislation.uk/national-crime-agency-complaints-and-misconduct-regulations-2013/regulation-64
Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Source: legislation.gov.uk, The National Archives.